0:03 The South African media simply can't
0:06 stop lying to you. And this time it's
0:09 about the Middle East crisis. Let's get
0:16 So the South African media really seems
0:18 to have it out for the population,
0:22 refusing to show them the truth as is
0:25 and consistently distorting facts to fit
0:27 their agenda, or rather should I say the
0:31 ANC's agenda. And now they seem to be
0:32 doing it not only when it comes to local
0:35 South African issues but also global as
0:37 well particularly when it comes to
0:40 Israel and Hamas. Now recently there was
0:43 a video released whereby Israeli
0:45 soldiers operating in Janin which is
0:46 actually in the West Bank otherwise
0:49 known as Judea and Samaria had
0:52 neutralized two Palestinian men. But unfortunately,
0:54 unfortunately,
0:56 the South African media and specifically
0:59 the state-owned SABC
1:01 has not been willing to share the full
1:03 facts with the public. And we're going
1:06 to be debunking their lies right here.
1:08 But before I get into it, could I please
1:10 remind you to subscribe to the channel.
1:12 It's completely free and all you have to
1:14 do is click on that subscribe button in
1:16 the bottom left corner of this video.
1:18 Now, let's get into it. So, I'll start
1:21 with the SABC's article right here
1:25 titled UN says Israeli forces killing
1:27 two West Bank Palestinians looks like
1:30 summary execution. So, of course, the
1:33 SABC is taking the opinion of the UN.
1:36 So, the UN said on Friday that the
1:38 killing of two Palestinian men in the
1:40 occupied West Bank by Israeli security
1:42 forces the previous day appeared to be a
1:45 summary execution in footage captured by
1:48 Palestine TV. very creative name.
1:51 Israeli security forces opened fired at
1:53 two men in the northern West Bank city
1:55 of Janin after they appeared to have surrendered.
1:57 surrendered.
1:59 They were the men were seen leaving the
2:00 building and lifting their shirts before
2:02 lying on the ground in apparent
2:04 surrender. Now this part is important
2:07 which I'm highlighting right here. The
2:09 forces then appeared to direct them back
2:12 into the building before shooting them.
2:16 This line is absolute hogwash
2:19 nonsense. But who could expect anything
2:23 better from the ANC bought and paid for SABC?
2:25 SABC?
2:28 Anyway, I continue. We're appalled by
2:30 the brazing killing of Israeli borders
2:33 police yesterday of two Palestinian men
2:35 in Janin in the occupied West Bank in
2:38 yet another apparent summary execution.
2:40 UN Human Rights Office spokesperson
2:45 Jeremy Lawrence told press in Geneva.
2:46 Now, what's really important to note
2:49 here is that if we look at other media
2:52 sources, we see how the story seems to
2:54 have been distorted in different ways.
2:56 I'll give you another example. So, here
2:58 we have a report from the Times of
3:00 Israel, which of course is going to be
3:02 on the opposite end. They're going to be
3:05 favoring Israel, where the reporting is
3:07 a little bit different. So here it
3:09 explains that the Palestinian Authority
3:11 accuses Israeli forces of deliberately
3:14 committing a war crime following what it
3:15 called the brutal summary executions of
3:18 two men in Janin in the West Bank on
3:21 Thursday. So, if we go down to the
3:22 description of the event, the IDF and
3:24 police are investigating an incident
3:27 today in which border police officers
3:29 shot two Palestinians who are wanted on
3:30 suspicion of involvement in bombing and
3:33 shooting attacks against troops after
3:35 the suspects had earlier surrendered
3:37 themselves. And this is very important
3:40 to note because in the SABC's report,
3:41 which is freely available on the
3:43 internet for anyone to read, they made
3:46 no mention of these links. rather they
3:48 just made it sound as if these were just
3:50 two ordinary men going about their day.
3:54 And so you already see the difference in
3:56 reporting here.
4:00 So the officers involved in the incident
4:01 have reportedly said that the suspects
4:04 exited a building surrendering but then
4:06 tried to go back into the building
4:09 violating the troops instructions and
4:11 that only then they were shot. And so
4:13 what we see here is two completely
4:15 contradictory reports. The SABC claims
4:17 that the troops directed them to reenter
4:19 the building, which honestly makes no
4:21 sense. And I'll explain why. Whereas
4:24 here we see a report saying that they
4:25 attempted to go back into the building,
4:28 meaning the two Palestinians, against
4:31 troops orders, and then they were shot.
4:32 But what we're going to do now is we're
4:35 going to watch the event, the actual
4:38 video in real time to decide which side
4:40 seems to be more accurate. Now, before
4:43 we do, just a quick warning to sensitive
4:46 viewers that while this does of course
4:48 depict the moment when all of this
4:51 happened, you don't have to worry. The
4:54 actual incident itself is blurred out.
4:57 And so, any of you who are sensitive can
4:59 rest assured that you're not going to
5:03 see anything graphic or gory due to the
5:05 blurring out. So, feel comfortable to
5:30 all right. So, they seem to be compliant except
5:31 except
5:35 look over here. See how this man on the
5:37 left who's on the floor is all of a
5:40 sudden reaching over with his hand to
5:41 the other side of his body which is
5:44 hidden from the IDF. Now this is already
5:46 a warning sign for the military because
5:48 what people with military background
5:50 will know is to look out for things like
5:52 this. He could be carrying a concealed
5:55 weapon. It's very difficult to know. And
5:56 let's also not forget that the soldiers
5:58 are on high alert. They are not like the
6:01 rest of us who are just sitting back in
6:04 our chairs at our desks or on the couch
6:06 watching this event being replayed. They
6:08 are in the firing [clears throat] line.
6:10 Their lives are at risk as they are
6:12 taking on people who are believed to be
6:14 associated with terror groups. And so
6:16 you need to understand that they are
6:19 going to be on high alert. They do not
6:21 want to succumb to any injury or
6:24 possibly something worse if they do slip
6:27 up. And so, of course, this is a massive
6:29 warning sign to them. But let's continue.
6:38 All right. So, as we see here, these men
6:40 have now returned to where they were.
6:42 But what's really important to note here
6:45 is I do not see from the officer's body
6:49 language at all any signs that they are
6:52 directing the men to return to where
6:55 they were within that garage. There's
6:58 absolutely no indication and anybody
7:00 that says otherwise is lying because
7:01 here you are watching this video with
7:04 me. There's absolutely no indication and
7:06 of course there's no audio to suggest
7:09 what the people are saying. So where the
7:13 UN or the SIBC gets evidence of this,
7:15 God only knows because it certainly
7:23 All right. So here we see it's blurred
7:26 out. The shots have been fired. But I'd
7:28 like to also focus on something else
7:30 that's really important to note over
7:35 here. So the men try to go back inside.
7:38 But if we watch specifically this man
7:40 who's standing upright now, he's going
7:43 to produce a movement that's also quite
7:45 alarming to soldiers. [music]
7:47 [music]
7:50 Okay, watch him there. Do you see how he
7:53 just quickly races back down into the
7:55 wherever it is that he came out of? He
7:57 seemed to be moving very slowly and then
7:59 all of a sudden he just dots back into
8:02 the darkness. I'll let you watch it
8:03 again so that you can see what I'm
8:06 talking about. So keep focusing on him.
8:10 There we go. Now,
8:12 so there you have it. That's the second
8:14 warning sign. Now, what we need to
8:16 understand here is that the soldiers had
8:19 apprehended these men. They told them to
8:22 show that they were unarmed. The men did
8:23 so. They lifted their shirts. But then
8:25 all of a sudden, you have the first man
8:28 on the floor who's reaching over to his
8:30 other side, which is hidden from the
8:32 soldiers, suggesting he could have a
8:34 concealed weapon. and he's crawling back
8:36 to the dark area he came from. And then
8:39 of course the man who was standing hit
8:41 the ground and all of a sudden made a
8:44 very fast movement to dart back inside.
8:46 And now any trained soldier is going to
8:48 know that that is a suspicious movement.
8:51 Why is he darting back inside when the
8:53 soldiers have ordered him to be still
8:55 and have ordered him to be there so that
8:58 they can arrest him and obviously detain
9:01 him? Why is he doing that? Firstly, he's
9:03 disobeying their orders, and that of
9:05 course is problematic. But then
9:10 secondly, they cannot know what sort of
9:14 booby traps he has plotted inside or
9:16 perhaps if there's maybe more militants
9:18 on the inside. And then the minute that
9:21 the IDF soldiers decide to follow this
9:24 man inside, they get ambushed by whoever
9:26 else he's working with. And the reason
9:28 why I'm actually bringing this up is
9:31 because it's a very real problem in Gaza
9:34 and the West Bank. And Kamas is also
9:35 active in the West Bank. Please
9:38 remember. And I'm going to show you
9:41 evidence of exactly what Kamas does in
9:44 the following report. So here on the
9:47 IDF's official website, we have an
9:49 official report from the Israeli
9:52 military. And this report speaks about
9:55 how the IDF has captured intel which
9:59 reveals Kamas's explosive plans. So as
10:02 they write, "Our soldiers found a Kamas
10:05 training manual in Gaza, the contents,
10:07 instructions on how to make bombs at
10:10 home." So, anybody who's been following
10:12 the current warfare and those who maybe
10:14 have listened to military experts such
10:17 as John Spencer or Andrew Fox will know
10:21 that Kamas is very fond of creating
10:24 IEDs, which are improvised explosive
10:26 devices made of all different sorts of
10:29 materials. Some of which are military
10:30 grade and others which can even be made
10:34 from household products partially. And
10:36 so, as we can see in this report over here,
10:37 here,
10:39 our soldiers on the ground in Gaza
10:41 recently captured a training manual that
10:43 gives them step-by-step instructions on
10:46 how to make homemade bombs. The manual
10:48 amounts to a terrorism 101 handbook on
10:50 concealing and detonating all kinds of
10:52 explosives. And as you can see from
10:55 this, those kinds of IEDs could be
10:57 hidden in the area where the two men in
10:59 Janine were hiding before being
11:02 apprehended. And just to provide further
11:04 context, we see that this um specific
11:08 article was dated back in 2014. And so
11:09 it's been a very very long time that
11:12 Kamas has been honing this craft. They
11:15 are certainly not new at it.
11:17 Anyway, as we continue, we see here that
11:19 the training manual contains
11:21 instructions for handling and detonating
11:23 different types of explosives. Page 14
11:26 explains how to fill a television-shaped
11:28 bomb with shrapnel.
11:31 So here we see Kamas has experimented
11:33 with many kinds of explosives during the
11:36 course of its existence in the 1990s and
11:38 into the second inifard. Kamas suicide
11:40 bombers blew themselves up in cafes,
11:43 restaurants, hotels, shopping malls, and
11:46 buses. Kamas continues to use suicide
11:49 belts. a day. IDF soldiers operating on
11:51 the ground in Gaza continue to come
11:53 across civilian homes rigged by
11:54 terrorists with explosives. All kinds of
11:57 mines, remotely determinated bombs and
11:59 other IED have been found throughout
12:01 Gaza. And we know that these kinds of
12:03 devices and traps that have been set up
12:06 by Kamas continue to kill IDF soldiers
12:08 all the way up until the current year
12:10 before the current ceasefire went into
12:12 effect. Now, I'm not going to continue
12:14 with the entire article. For those of
12:16 you who do want to review it, I'll
12:17 include a link in the description box
12:21 below. But what this shows us is two
12:23 things primarily. First of all, the SABC
12:26 is refusing to acknowledge any potential
12:29 terror ties that these men may have as
12:31 well as any potential danger that they
12:33 may have posed to the soldiers.
12:34 Secondly, they completely
12:37 mischaracterized the soldiers behaviors.
12:40 As we saw in the video, they refused to
12:42 acknowledge the suspicious way that the
12:44 two Palestinian men were behaving in
12:49 that same video as we saw. And probably
12:51 the most ridiculous thing is that
12:54 they've completely ignored the fact that
12:57 these men could have ties to Kamas. They
13:00 didn't obey the soldiers orders as we
13:01 see from the body language of the
13:05 soldiers. And there is this IED problem
13:08 in Gaza and the West Bank. And it's
13:11 nothing new. As we see, this report is
13:14 over 10 years old. And so ultimately,
13:16 the SABC is just doing exactly what it
13:19 always does, filling that same ANC
13:22 agenda, refusing to tell the plain
13:25 truth, and instead continues to distort
13:28 the situation in order to please whoever
13:30 its masters may be. And so my message to
13:33 you is to just remain informed, check
13:37 out as many potential um news outlets as
13:39 you can and actually just do your own
13:41 research in order to gain as much
13:44 knowledge on any situation as possible.
13:46 Thank you very much for tuning into this
13:48 video. If you found it informative,
13:50 please remember to subscribe to the
13:52 channel for more content. Until next
13:56 time, I'm Matthew Cohen and this is the
