0:02 Liquidity forms in many areas in the
0:04 market and has a big bearing on whether
0:06 you're going to win or lose. One of the
0:09 areas liquidity forms is around supply
0:11 and demand zones. So, in this class, I'm
0:13 going to teach you an advanced liquidity
0:15 trading strategy to help you avoid
0:18 losses, improve your accuracy, get
0:20 higher win rates, and ultimately become
0:21 a better trader. If you're new to
0:23 liquidity, I'm going to explain it to
0:25 you now. If you're not new to liquidity,
0:27 use the chapters to skip ahead to the
0:29 start of the next chapter and we'll
0:31 start on the more advanced technique.
0:34 So, liquidity in a market refers to
0:36 orders. Orders generally in the form of
0:39 stop- losses and buy stops and sell
0:41 stops. There are two very common forms
0:43 of liquidity and two that we'll be using
0:45 in the more advanced method. These are
0:47 equal high, which is this one here, and
0:50 equal low liquidity, which simply refers
0:52 to support and resistance levels. and
0:54 then ascending and descending trend
0:57 lines. General retail education suggests
0:59 when you see a resistance level in a
1:02 market, you should look to sell that
1:05 resistance. Okay? So after the second
1:06 tap forms, anywhere from there on
1:09 becomes a good selling level. Now the
1:12 general idea there then is when you sell
1:14 your stop loss will go above the
1:16 resistance because the idea is the
1:18 market is likely to react from this
1:21 resistance level and trade down without
1:24 breaking above. So we know from this
1:26 there is going to be a lot of traders
1:28 with stop-loss orders above the equal
1:31 highs. So here we have stop- losses.
1:33 Now, as well as this, we have breakout
1:35 traders who will be looking for the
1:37 market to push up and break above a
1:39 resistance level and then use it on the
1:42 retest as a support to buy from. So, as
1:44 well as stop-loss orders being above the
1:46 high, we're going to have buy stop
1:50 orders, which are automatic buy orders.
1:52 Essentially, this creates more liquidity
1:54 and more orders above that level. Now,
1:56 if we think about what a stop-loss is in
1:59 the case of a sell trade, it is an order
2:02 to automatically buy back contracts for
2:04 more than you sold them for. Because a
2:06 short selling order, i.e. selling at
2:08 these levels, is simply where you sell
2:10 with an obligation to buy back later,
2:12 regardless of whether it's a higher or
2:14 lower price. So, stop losses in this
2:17 instance are actually buy orders. We
2:19 have a large amount of buy orders above
2:21 this level. Now in two formats in stop-
2:24 losses and in buy stops. Now if we have
2:27 a massive amount of buy orders above
2:29 this level. So that creates a lot of
2:32 buyside liquidity. What do we have as a
2:35 potential opportunity here? Well, let's
2:37 say you are an institutional trader, a
2:39 bank, a firm, or simply a large player
2:41 with massive amounts of money,
2:42 multi-million dollars, and you want to
2:44 place large orders. Now, if you think
2:46 about where we are in this point
2:48 underneath this resistance, if you want
2:50 to sell millions of dollars worth of a
2:52 contract, you will be left with a pretty
2:54 bad price. What will actually happen is
2:56 you'll sell some and your movement could
2:58 drive the market down because the amount
3:00 of money you're working with is so
3:03 large. So then your second execution may
3:05 be here, you may get a third execution
3:06 here, and so on. you're going to have a
3:08 bad average price because the selling
3:10 you're doing is actually driving the
3:12 market down, meaning you'll never be
3:14 able to get your full order on at this
3:16 good level. So, if you're expecting the
3:17 market to move lower and you want to
3:20 sell into that, what you can actually do
3:23 is wait for this liquidity to be hit and
3:25 this is going to open up lots of buy
3:27 orders. So, if there's not enough
3:28 selling pressure here, there may be
3:30 buying pressure enough to push us over
3:33 the high into this area where lots of
3:34 buying orders are going to be triggered.
3:36 When all of these buying orders in the
3:39 form of buy stops and selling stop
3:41 losses are triggered in this region,
3:43 there's going to be a massive influx all
3:46 at the same time of buying taking place.
3:48 And if you are a massive seller, you
3:51 have now a lot of liquidity to take on
3:53 the other side of the trade. If there
3:55 are now thousands of buy orders being
3:57 executed at the same time, you can
3:59 execute a massive amount of monies worth
4:02 of sell orders. And that leaves us with
4:04 this format which is what we call a
4:07 liquidity sweep or a false breakout. The
4:10 market pushes above and stops out anyone
4:12 who sold the resistance and it also
4:15 triggers in anyone who wanted to buy the
4:18 break retest and then the large player
4:20 can take the sell on the other side of
4:22 all of these buys which will drive the
4:24 market down. So it creates a scenario
4:26 where you end up losing before the
4:29 market moves in your favor. Now equal
4:31 lows work in exactly the same way. We
4:35 have buying taking place upon a support
4:38 floor. We have lots of stop losses
4:40 underneath. These stop- losses are
4:44 automatic sell orders. Basically, if
4:45 you've bought contracts on that
4:47 resistance, so basically, if you've
4:49 bought contracts on the support floor
4:52 around here, your stop loss will be set
4:54 to automatically sell those contracts
4:56 back for a loss if the market gets down
4:58 here so that you don't take a massive
5:02 loss. So, that creates lots of sell
5:05 liquidity. Okay. Now, we also have sell
5:08 stop orders, automatic orders that will
5:10 trigger sellers into trades if the
5:12 support breaks because they will
5:14 anticipate further downside movement.
5:16 So, we now have lots of sell liquidity.
5:18 If you are a massive institutional
5:20 buyer, the market getting into this
5:23 region will trigger loads of liquidity
5:25 for you to take the other side of. So,
5:27 then your large buys can be executed
5:29 easier from down there and the market
5:31 will make its run to the upside. So, as
5:34 you can see, buying from support and
5:36 selling from resistance, what should be
5:39 a good way to trade actually has a large
5:41 flaw, and that's the fact that
5:43 institutional participants who actually
5:45 have the power to drive markets are not
5:47 executing at these levels and are more
5:50 likely to be executing above and below.
5:52 So, selling from equal highs and buying
5:55 from equal lows is generally never going
5:57 to be a good idea. Now, let's talk about
6:00 trend lines. These work in very much the
6:03 same way. The idea with trend lines is
6:05 after the first two taps of a trend line
6:07 have been created, any further taps from
6:10 there should be good for buying. So we
6:12 will have traders who are looking to buy
6:15 another retest of the trend line. Now
6:17 what do we have here? Well, again we get
6:19 this liquidity problem with lots of
6:21 buying taking place here. We have lots
6:24 of stop- losses underneath that area. We
6:26 also have traders who are looking for
6:28 break retest trades. So they will be
6:30 looking more so for the trend line to
6:33 break, pull back, retest and then sell
6:35 lower. So as well as having lots of
6:38 stop- losses here from the buyers, we
6:40 also have lots of sell stops here for
6:42 the breakout traders which creates a
6:46 large pool of liquidity again. So what
6:47 we'll generally see happening in the
6:51 market is instead of a clean test or
6:54 instead of a clean break retest, we will
6:56 often times come through the trend line,
6:58 sweep all of this liquidity and then
7:01 move higher, which ends up stopping out
7:03 the traders on the buy side and stopping
7:05 out the traders on the sell side. And
7:07 again, it happens because of all the
7:09 liquidity that larger players can take
7:12 the other side of. In a descending trend
7:14 line, it's the same. Any sellers looking
7:16 to sell a retest of a trend line here or
7:19 any breakout traders looking to buy upon
7:23 the break will have considerable number
7:26 of orders and liquidity in this area. So
7:28 if the market is able to get into this
7:30 area, we then often times see the market
7:33 just come back down like this creating a
7:35 false break and again stopping out the
7:37 buyers and the sellers. So that is the
7:39 basic liquidity that you need to
7:41 understand. Now we're going to move on
7:42 to the more advanced approach of these
7:44 inducements and the liquidity around
7:46 supply and demand. So while the concepts
7:48 of liquidity structure, supply and
7:51 demand imbalances all go together in the
7:53 form of price action or what some people
7:56 call smart money trading, we still need
7:59 to be aware of liquidity around areas of
8:01 supply and demand. So in this instance,
8:03 we're going to be looking at a supply
8:05 zone, which is a zone that we would look
8:07 to sell from once the market returns to
8:10 that level. Now, in this hypothetical
8:12 example, what we want to make sure we
8:14 are doing is considering factors of
8:17 liquidity like equal highs, equal lows,
8:19 and trend liquidity when we're looking
8:22 at our supply zones. So, if we were to
8:24 come into a supply zone and formulate
8:26 this kind of price action where we
8:30 create this equal high area, this double
8:33 top area, we realistically would not
8:36 want to sell from here. And the reason
8:38 is because although we are reacting from
8:40 the supply zone, we still have this
8:42 factor of liquidity and we still may be
8:43 looking at what we can call an
8:46 inducement where we could be drawn into
8:48 the market or lured into a sell before
8:50 the market takes out those highs. So
8:53 let's say we sold here and the market so
8:55 let's say we sold here and we were
8:56 expecting the market to continue running
8:59 down. The risk that we run here is that
9:02 we actually get a push up to take out
9:04 the equal highs that have been formed.
9:06 And the thing is this is quite a common
9:09 thing to occur. So when we create equal
9:11 highs like this or what we could see as
9:13 a double top or resistance inside of a
9:15 supply zone, it doesn't mean that we're
9:17 going to get that immediate drive away.
9:19 And what will commonly happen is we'll
9:21 actually drive up and take those highs
9:25 out before making the sell move. Which
9:26 means if you were selling beneath with a
9:28 stop above those highs, you would be
9:31 stopped out. Whereas realistically it
9:33 could be a movement like this that takes
9:34 place. Now, there's another way that
9:36 things can go slightly wrong here, and
9:38 that is if we have a couple of different
9:40 zones to work with, which will happen
9:42 quite often when you're looking at
9:44 supply and demand. So, we see above
9:46 here, there is an imbalance into a
9:49 supply zone. Now, if we go ahead and
9:51 trust this double top or resistance
9:54 that's formed here, even if, for
9:56 example, we reacted from it another time
9:58 and we started to see some serious
10:01 weakness kicking in, we still have the
10:03 liquidity problem. We still have this
10:05 area above which has a high likelihood
10:08 of being taken out. And as we've said,
10:10 sometimes it's going to come up and do
10:13 this. But what can also happen when we
10:15 create liquidity like this is the market
10:18 may extend through into the higher
10:21 supply. So, not only do we have to worry
10:23 about what's going on inside of the
10:25 existing supply, we also need to make
10:28 sure that we understand the larger
10:30 context and if there's any other areas
10:32 the market may reach to in order to
10:34 create the large meaningful move. So,
10:36 how exactly do we combat this then? How
10:37 do we make sure we're not getting
10:40 liquidated first of all inside of the
10:42 supply we're looking at and second of
10:44 all inside of even the larger context
10:46 where there could be other zones that
10:47 the market will be drawn to. Well,
10:49 there's an entry model that we can use
10:51 to get around this problem. I call it
10:54 standard confirmation. It's nothing new.
10:57 It's just a structural shift that we can
11:00 identify inside of this area or inside
11:02 of this area to validate our trades
11:04 better and have a higher probability of
11:06 winning. So, the standard confirmation
11:08 is a market that is going from higher
11:12 highs and higher lows such as this
11:15 movement up here, i.e. an uptrend very
11:16 much in the way that we're creating
11:19 higher highs and higher lows here and
11:21 then shifts down into a lower low where
11:23 we then look to sell from the lower
11:26 high. So our selling idea would kick in
11:29 here. Now what a standard confirmation
11:31 shows us is a clear change in control
11:34 from buying into selling in a market.
11:37 And it's this point here, this break
11:39 into a lower low which validates a
11:42 change in the trend. Then when we pull
11:44 back, we can quite safely sell on any
11:47 retracement to bring the market lower.
11:48 Now, if we take a look at what we've
11:51 seen in this example with the equal
11:54 highs, we actually don't have that here
11:56 because we haven't had a clear shift
11:58 from buying into selling. All we've done
12:00 is come up and create a level of
12:02 liquidity and then we've started some
12:05 movements down inside of the range, but
12:07 we don't have the clear change in
12:09 control ahead of us. We don't see that,
12:12 right? which means which means it's
12:15 likely before the execution is made that
12:18 we will see a push up and then we'll see
12:20 that change in control where the market
12:23 shifts into the lows like so. Now if the
12:25 market had come into this zone and
12:27 instead of creating equal highs had done
12:29 this well then this would have swept
12:31 liquidity over the swing high and showed
12:34 a meaningful change in the trend here
12:35 that we could have used to get into a
12:38 trade upon the pullback around here. So
12:41 our trade could look like this and it
12:42 would be very high probability because
12:44 what we've actually done is align the
12:47 smaller trend here. So this reversal
12:49 that's taking place inside of this area
12:52 with the larger trend which as we can
12:55 see is of course bearish. So we've
12:56 pretty much used the larger bearish
12:59 picture and then we've gone into the low
13:00 time frame structure and found a small
13:03 bearish picture here to execute into.
13:05 Right? So, at this point, we have high
13:07 and low time frame validation and
13:09 agreement, which allows us to take a
13:11 high probability trade. But when we're
13:14 looking at a market with equal highs,
13:15 we're not seeing that. We're actually
13:18 seeing a magnet price area that the
13:20 market is likely to be drawn towards.
13:21 And we're not seeing the clear control
13:24 shift yet. So, a movement like this
13:26 would be more ideal to then provide us
13:28 with the pullback sell opportunity
13:30 because that would validate a clear
13:32 change in trend and it would also mean
13:34 the liquidity is taken out. So if we
13:36 look at this with the other example of
13:38 where we may have multiple supply zones,
13:40 the reason this becomes so useful is
13:43 because if we created this equal high
13:45 liquidity here, rather than just having
13:47 to guess into a cell when we get up
13:49 here, we can actually wait for the
13:51 market to make its movement and confirm
13:53 that change in the trend. Now, often
13:55 times you're going to see something like
13:58 this taking place where this initially
14:00 looked like a really good place to sell
14:02 and it did create some form of small
14:04 downward move. But now, because of your
14:06 understanding of liquidity, you would
14:08 have avoided selling because you know
14:09 that we're under a high probability
14:11 point of liquidity that the market is
14:14 likely to be drawn into. Now, if instead
14:16 of then just selling once liquidity has
14:18 been taken, you wait for the standard
14:20 confirmation that we've just discussed,
14:22 you may see sometimes the market
14:24 completely fails to react from the
14:26 existing supply and instead moves on
14:29 towards another supply like this one
14:33 here. At that point, you can employ the
14:35 standard confirmation. And when you see
14:37 that change in the trend, that's going
14:39 to be your validating factor that allows
14:42 you to sell. in which case you would be
14:44 able to get a trade like this. Now,
14:46 because you've also waited for
14:48 confirmation of this reversal, it will
14:51 help you to avoid taking a loss here or
14:54 taking a loss here by just by just
14:56 blindly selling either beneath or even
14:59 above the equal highs. So this
15:01 confirmation pattern here, which is what
15:03 we use here to execute a trade like
15:05 this, is going to save you from a lot of
15:07 losses, and it's also going to help you
15:09 to validate the perfect zone to buy or
15:12 sell from and also lock in entries from
15:14 the highest probability points. So let's
15:16 go take a look at this in a real market.
15:18 Okay, so we're looking at Euro Swiss
15:20 Frank. We're on the 5minut time frame.
15:21 This concept works across all time
15:23 frames because it's supply and demand.
15:25 What we've got here is a market that has
15:27 just started moving to the upside. We've
15:29 seen a retest of this demand zone and
15:31 the market's now pushed up into this new
15:33 high. Now, we can begin explaining this
15:36 concept by simply looking at what's
15:39 already occurred. We had this drive to
15:41 the upside. If we wanted to continue
15:43 buying, there's actually already been
15:45 multiple areas of demand that we could
15:47 have potentially looked at for our
15:49 buying opportunities. There are really
15:51 three demand zones inside of this range.
15:53 There's this one here, this one here,
15:56 and then this low at the extreme. This
15:57 has an efficient range previous to it,
15:59 meaning there's no more imbalance. So,
16:01 this would be the final zone. Now, if we
16:03 think about what we've said, we are
16:05 basically looking to choose the right
16:07 demand zone and avoid getting
16:10 liquidated. So, what we would do here is
16:13 not buy the first zone. We didn't get
16:14 any confirmation from this point and
16:16 there is still imbalance beneath. As you
16:18 can see, the market then went on to
16:20 liquidate that low.
16:22 We would also not have bought the second
16:24 zone because as we see when the market
16:25 came into this level there was no
16:27 confirmation provided and there is still
16:29 again imbalance below meaning there is
16:31 possibility for the market to come into
16:34 this zone. Now you can see after hitting
16:36 this zone we've actually seen that shift
16:38 in the trend. So if we mark up the trend
16:41 we have the high the low lower high
16:44 lower low high lower low. That is our
16:47 trending move so far. Which means this
16:49 high just here where I have the BOS
16:51 marked is where the structure would need
16:53 to break in order to validate a change
16:56 in the trend. Now we see after creating
16:59 this price action, we've had our
17:01 confirmation. We've had our break into a
17:03 new high, which means we can now start
17:05 looking for buying opportunities by
17:07 simply using demand to then place our
17:11 buy limit. Now, that is of course entry
17:13 number one. That is the bigger setup and
17:15 we'd expect the market to pull back
17:18 before leading off into new highs. Okay.
17:19 But what we're going to do now is look
17:22 at a kind of opportunity inside of an
17:23 opportunity. We're going to isolate the
17:26 price action to this existing move here.
17:28 If we break this down to a lower time
17:29 frame, we're seeing pretty much the same
17:31 thing again. We've seen a bearish market
17:34 shifting into new highs, which creates a
17:36 bullish market. And now we have to work
17:39 out where to buy from. So we have in
17:42 this range a demand zone just here
17:44 indecision before a large push away. And
17:46 we have this demand zone down here which
17:48 is again indecision before a large push
17:50 away. Okay. So I'm going to clear these
17:52 ones off for now just to keep things
17:54 simple and focused on the existing price
17:58 action. To note we have a imbalance into
18:00 this area of demand and we also have
18:03 imbalance into the area of demand above
18:06 as well. So how would we pick which of
18:07 these zones to buy from? Well, due to
18:09 that inducement theory we just
18:12 discussed, we would number one want to
18:14 see if we get confirmation inside of
18:16 these areas. If we get a confirmation in
18:18 here, then we may potentially be able to
18:21 lead through into new buys. However, we
18:24 still have got liquidity imbalance
18:26 beneath which would lead us into the
18:28 lower zone. So, by looking at this
18:30 immediately, we would consider the most
18:32 probable outcome is going to be that the
18:34 market sweeps this level. The reason
18:35 this is important is because if you
18:37 start placing buy limits here with your
18:39 stop loss underneath the zone, you're
18:41 opening your yourself up to the
18:43 inducement theory and you're opening
18:44 yourself up to being stopped out on a
18:46 trade that is in theory correct. You've
18:49 got the market direction right. You know
18:51 buying is the right move, but you're
18:53 buying in a place where you can easily
18:54 lose before the market follows through
18:57 with its opportunity. So what we would
19:00 want to see would be confirmations
19:02 inside of one of these zones with a
19:04 clear focus as our primary zone on this
19:07 lower area which is going to be the kind
19:10 of zone beneath inducement. Okay. So
19:12 scaling the market forward we see we get
19:15 a push down into the first zone. What we
19:16 would realistically want to see from
19:18 here then would have been a break above
19:20 this high. So if we'd come into there
19:22 and we'd started to push higher we could
19:24 potentially trust that zone. we'd say,
19:25 okay, maybe it's not inducement because
19:27 we are pushing back at the highs and
19:29 creating a bullish shift in this smaller
19:30 trend. And the smaller trend for
19:33 reference here is going to be this is
19:36 our high. This is our low. This is our
19:38 lower high. This is our lower low. So,
19:40 if the market had broken up, that would
19:42 have created what we need to see for a
19:44 buying opportunity. However, as you can
19:46 see, the market didn't do that. It did
19:48 what it usually does, and it pushed
19:50 through to fill the imbalance and trade
19:52 towards this lower zone. Now, if we want
19:54 to be safe that this market isn't just
19:56 going to sink all the way down lower, we
19:58 can use the entry model that we just
20:00 previously discussed to make sure we are
20:03 taking a confirmed trade. So, if we
20:05 allow this market to scale forward a
20:08 little bit more, you can see what we've
20:11 actually done here up to this point is
20:13 now start to make some changes in the
20:16 trend. We had this high. We came down.
20:18 We created new lows. We've hit this
20:20 demand. And then inside of some of the
20:22 refined price action, so 5m minute price
20:24 action, we've broke a structure point
20:26 just here. The market's pulled back and
20:28 pushed higher once again. Now this has
20:30 pushed us into what we call an efficient
20:32 range. There is no imbalance around
20:34 here. So we can happily look to buy this
20:36 market given that we've seen a break of
20:38 structure there on the lower time frames
20:40 and we've also seen the market take out
20:42 these highs. Now, ideally, we would want
20:44 to see a closure above this level for
20:46 the most high confidence trade, but in
20:47 this instance, we have everything we
20:49 really need to see. We've seen a demand
20:51 zone retest, break of the internal
20:53 structure, and we've also seen the
20:54 market show willingness to go higher
20:57 here with no supply zone to cap price.
20:59 So if there was a clear imbalance supply
21:01 here and we'd wicked into it, we could
21:03 say, okay, that is probably not going to
21:04 be the trade we want to take simply
21:06 because there's possibility for this to
21:09 then reverse on us because maybe supply
21:10 is going to maintain strength and push
21:13 us lower. But because we don't have that
21:14 and we've pushed into what we call an
21:16 efficient range, which is basically an
21:18 area where there is no imbalance
21:21 anywhere at all in this range now, we've
21:23 essentially opened doors to moving
21:24 higher because there's no point of
21:27 resistance that should cap price. So, we
21:29 can look at the next obvious demand. I
21:31 mean, this one here, we do have this
21:33 little wick that pushes out of it. But
21:34 what do we still have? This is very
21:36 important to me. We still have a clear
21:38 imbalance. Okay? And an imbalance like
21:41 this is very likely to be filled before
21:43 we start moving into new highs. So, with
21:46 this demand zone still having imbalance,
21:47 I'd be happy to use this for my buying
21:50 opportunity. And we look beneath. There
21:52 is no imbalance down here. There is no
21:54 area of demand down here. This again is
21:58 an efficient range. So this here is the
22:00 last inefficiency or the last imbalance
22:02 left inside of this price move. So our
22:05 trade could go here with a buy limit.
22:07 Stop could go under the zone and then
22:10 our target could go up towards
22:12 the new highs that we want to target for
22:14 this trade. Let's just push it towards
22:17 this supply zone here. We can of course
22:19 extend this out into larger swing
22:20 trades. So we'll actually leave it like
22:24 that. Yeah. Right. So let's break this
22:26 down real quick then. Number one, the
22:28 first thing we did was on these higher
22:30 time frame perspective, we identified
22:33 demand zone here. We didn't buy that
22:35 because there was no confirmation. We
22:38 identified a demand zone here. We also
22:39 didn't buy this one again because there
22:41 was no confirmation given. And then the
22:43 extreme demand, which is basically the
22:44 last demand zone that exists. As you can
22:46 see, there's no more demand zones before
22:48 this down to around this level. I've
22:50 actually accounted for just the smaller
22:52 candle above as well, but we didn't have
22:53 to do that. That's just because I like
22:55 to make sure I've got the full range
22:57 covered. We see that this was retested
23:00 and then following the retest, this push
23:01 up here created a breaking structure
23:04 which validates buys are likely to come
23:06 into the market. Then we went down and
23:08 took an isolated look at some lower time
23:10 frame price action. We can do this
23:12 completely separately. This could be two
23:14 trades because realistically with the
23:16 retest we've just had here, we could
23:17 have just placed a buy limit, right? But
23:19 I'm trying to show you this across kind
23:21 of multiple uh time frames or bigger
23:24 picture and smaller picture view. So
23:26 again, we had the same push. We had a
23:28 push which broke us into new highs. That
23:30 creates a bullish leg of movement here.
23:31 We want to buy from this range. We have
23:34 one two demand zones to choose from. We
23:36 do not get confirmation from the first
23:38 one and we're understanding there is
23:40 imbalance still left which could lead
23:42 the market into the next one. And then
23:43 when the market had reached into the
23:45 next one, we looked at the break of
23:46 structure, the push into an efficient
23:48 range again. And now we can confidently
23:50 choose this demand zone as the one to
23:52 buy from. And we've avoided a loss by
23:55 not buying here. We've played it safe by
23:57 waiting for the confirmation. And now
24:00 we're getting into basically the safest
24:02 possible trade. Okay, now we get a pullback,
24:04 pullback,
24:06 fill the demand zone, and then we get a
24:10 drive to the upside. And this market is
24:12 taking its time, but we've now pretty
24:14 much created a new bullish trend, right?
24:15 We saw a drive up. We've pulled back
24:18 down. We found footing around here. Had
24:19 we taken the profits at that supply
24:23 zone, we'd be out already for around a
24:24 three-hour trade. But given it the time
24:26 it needed, it's actually taken a bit
24:28 longer, but still follows through with
24:30 that movement of taking us into new
24:33 highs and providing an opportunity there
24:36 for a good trade. So that is the concept
24:39 of using that entry model to avoid the
24:40 inducement theory and make sure you
24:42 don't get stopped out of trades that can
24:45 be easily won. These are the results I
24:46 got from trading these concepts last
24:48 year and here are some wins from the
24:50 past week from my students so you know
24:53 to listen to me. This is a free course.
24:54 There's a link in the description to
24:56 this. It's going to show you how to
24:58 build systems, simplify trading, improve
24:59 your trades, and ultimately find
25:01 success. So, if you want to do that,
25:03 100% free. I think you'll enjoy it and
25:04 you know that I can provide you some
25:06 value because it's working for myself
25:08 and many other people as well. If you
25:09 don't want to do that, watch this video
25:11 next. Thank you for watching and I'll
