0:03 The so-called law of gravity is a
0:06 monumental hoax and constitutes one of
0:09 the biggest scops in all of history.
0:11 Assuming we actually live on the
0:14 spinning globe earth promoted by modern
0:16 freemasonic science, consider the
0:17 following calculations and contradictions.
0:19 contradictions.
0:22 The supposed law of gravity claims its
0:25 mysterious action at a distance force
0:30 can be measured as g * m1 * m2 / r 2
0:35 with g being equivalent to 6.674
0:38 * 10 ^ of -1.
0:41 Now consider the one world trade center
0:43 in New York which has a mass of
0:47 approximately 1 trill50 million kg. This
0:50 means that if you are an 80 kg man
0:53 standing 10 m away from the one world
0:55 trade center then there should be an
1:00 expected horizontal gravity of 0.05606
1:04 m/s squared. Considering the standard
1:08 rate of vertical gravity is 9.81 m/s
1:10 squared. This means the expected
1:12 horizontal gravity from the one world
1:16 trade center should be pulling at about
1:20 174th that of standard vertical gravity.
1:22 This may not sound significant but it
1:24 must be measurable and this point
1:27 becomes extremely interesting when the
1:30 same 80 kg man stands just 1 meter from
1:33 the one world trade center. In this
1:35 instance, the questionable law of
1:37 gravity calculates that the horizontal
1:41 gravity increases 100fold to a whopping
1:45 5.606 m/s squared, which is more than
1:49 half of standard vertical gravity. This
1:52 would absolutely be both measurable and
1:54 noticeable. The gravitational attraction
1:58 between an 80 kg man standing 1 meter
2:00 from the World Trade Center should be
2:02 easily felt and should require
2:04 significant effort to resist being
2:06 pulled into the wall like a magnet.
2:09 Finally, if the same man were to be so
2:11 unfortunate as to touch the trade
2:14 center, the bogus law of gravity says
2:16 that you will need to call the fire
2:18 brigade to come and detach the man
2:20 because he will no longer be able to
2:22 break free by his own strength.
2:26 Consider the same 80 kg man now on a
2:28 vacation to Switzerland where he goes to
2:30 rock climb the famous north face of the
2:34 Iger mountain. Here the mystical law of
2:36 gravity predicts that even if he loses
2:38 his grip while climbing, there is no
2:41 need to fear because it's impossible for
2:43 him to fall from the 10 billion ton
2:46 mountain. Since the distance between
2:48 himself and the mountain is almost zero,
2:51 making r squared in the equation nearly
2:54 negligible, the amount of horizontal
2:56 gravity pulling at him should cause him
2:58 to cling to the rock face like a magnet
3:02 sticking to a refrigerator door. Thus,
3:04 according to the magical law of gravity,
3:06 we are assured that rock climbing
3:09 massive mountains like these is actually
3:11 among the safest of pursuits imaginable
3:14 because falling is deemed physically
3:17 impossible. Again, it cannot be
3:19 overstated. The formula for gravity
3:22 implicitly implies that as any two
3:24 objects approach each other, the closer
3:27 the R value drops to zero, the stronger
3:29 the pulling force that exists between
3:32 them. When two objects physically touch
3:34 each other, the gravitational force
3:36 between them increases to a very large
3:39 number, implying that they should become
3:41 difficult to separate. In reality,
3:44 however, only magnets behave this way,
3:47 and no other objects show this supposed
3:49 increased attraction proportional to
3:53 distance as predicted by gravity.
3:55 Freemasonic science apologists
3:57 attempting to refute the necessity of
3:59 non-vertical gravity will often assert
4:02 the Star Trek argument of gravity only
4:04 comes from the center of the Earth,
4:07 Captain. But this is a nonsensical
4:10 double standard because the same broken
4:13 law of gravity claims this calculable
4:15 mutual attraction exists between all
4:18 objects, even between two particles, and
4:21 not solely from the center.
4:23 Google AI clarifies
4:26 gravitational attraction emanates from
4:28 the entire mass of an object, not just
4:31 from its center of mass. When dealing
4:33 with objects far apart or those with
4:36 spherical symmetry, assuming all mass
4:38 concentrates at a single point is done
4:42 to simplify calculations. Gravity acts
4:44 on all parts. While the center of mass
4:47 is helpful for simplified calculations,
4:50 every part of an object contributes to
4:52 its gravitational field. And this
4:54 distributed attraction has significant
4:57 consequences in various situations.
5:00 In other words, the pull of gravity
5:02 comes from the entire mass of objects,
5:04 not just from their center. So the
5:06 excuse of claiming gravity only comes
5:09 from the center of the Earth globe is an
5:11 unevidenced backpedaling double
5:14 standard. Another one of gravity's
5:17 nonsensical double standards is that
5:19 this same force is attributed to two
5:22 very different effects. Gravity is said
5:25 to cause all objects, people, buildings,
5:28 oceans, and the entire atmosphere to
5:30 stay clinging stuck to the spinning
5:33 globe Earth. Meanwhile, gravity is also
5:35 said to cause the moon to orbit around
5:38 the earth, the earth and other planets
5:40 to orbit around the sun, and the solar
5:43 system to orbit around the galaxy. This
5:45 means that sometimes gravity causes
5:48 objects to stick to one another, and
5:50 other times gravity causes objects to
5:53 orbit around one another. How can these
5:56 two very different effects be attributed
5:59 to the same force? Freemasonic science
6:01 claims that if the initial speed and
6:03 trajectory of the two objects is just
6:05 right, then instead of crashing
6:08 together, they can somehow perpetually
6:10 orbit each other due to the force of
6:12 gravity being perfectly balanced out by
6:15 the object's inertia, causing a
6:17 continuous curve around the central
6:20 object. If this is true, why is there
6:23 not a single experiment or demonstration
6:25 in history that shows two objects
6:27 meeting with such perfect inertia and
6:30 trajectory as to lock themselves in
6:33 perpetual orbit with one another? Why is
6:35 this special effect of gravity
6:38 conveniently limited only to objects so
6:41 large we cannot experiment on them? Yet
6:43 another contradiction and double
6:45 standard from the illogical law of
6:48 gravity is the behavior of helium
6:50 balloons. The formula for calculating
6:53 the force of gravity depends solely on
6:55 the masses of the two objects and the
6:58 distance between them. This means any
7:01 objects of nonzero mass will be subject
7:03 to the pull of gravity proportional to
7:06 their distance from one another. Why
7:09 then do helium balloons defy this fickle
7:12 law of gravity by first rising and then
7:13 clinging to your ceiling for several
7:16 days before slowly starting to hover
7:19 lower and then after many more hours or
7:22 days eventually settle to the ground.
7:24 Releasing the helium balloon from 10 m
7:28 off the ground or 1 cm off the ground
7:30 makes absolutely no difference to the
7:33 balloon's immediate defiance of gravity.
7:36 The same applies for a basketball thrown
7:39 into a lake. The broken law of gravity
7:42 calculates that the basketball must sink
7:44 and remain stuck at the bottom of the
7:46 lake because the force of gravity
7:48 depends solely on the masses of the two
7:51 objects and the distance between them.
7:54 But the basketball defies law by
7:56 immediately rising to the surface right
7:58 after it's thrown in.
8:00 How is it that helium balloons and
8:02 basketballs can become veritable
8:05 anti-gravity devices?
8:07 It's because the effects of so-called
8:10 gravity were actually well understood
8:12 and adequately explained by Archimedes
8:16 over 2,000 years ago. The Archimedes
8:18 principle buoyant force and relative
8:21 density already explained the effects of
8:24 fake gravity better and long before
8:27 Freemason and Jesuit Isaac Newton came
8:29 along with his inferior and redundant
8:33 theory. Under the valid laws of density
8:35 and buoyancy, everything seeks its
8:37 relative density with the medium
8:39 surrounding and rises or falls
8:42 accordingly. The true constant is
8:44 density, not gravity.
8:46 Basketballs fall down because they are
8:49 denser than air. And helium balloons
8:51 rise up because they are lighter than
8:54 air. A basketball held underwater and
8:57 released quickly rises to the surface
8:59 because the air inside the basketball
9:01 causes it to have a density less than
9:04 water. Then if a hole is poked in the
9:07 basketball and all the air squeezed out,
9:09 it will once again sink to the bottom of
9:11 the lake because its relative density
9:14 has increased to being more than water.
9:17 Newton's redundant theory of gravity has
9:19 nothing to do with this and simply
9:22 piggybacks off Archimedes principle and
9:24 the natural physics of density and buoyancy.
9:25 buoyancy.
9:28 If Newton's apple had landed in a puddle
9:30 instead of on his head, he would have
9:32 seen the apple only fell through the air
9:34 because it was denser than the air, but
9:37 then floated on top of the water because
9:40 it was less dense than water. These
9:42 so-called effects of gravity have
9:44 everything to do with relative density
9:47 and buoyant force and nothing to do with
9:50 Newton's extraneous theory of magical
9:53 action at a distance. In reality, this
9:55 pulling force called gravity has never
9:58 been proven to exist. And the only
10:01 reason it is referred to as law is
10:03 because the majority of Freemasonic
10:06 science depends upon it. Without this
10:08 myth of gravity, a whole host of other
10:11 lies and misconceptions are exposed as
10:14 nothing but untenable theories,
10:17 including the supposed spinning globe
