Our intuitive understanding of time as a flowing river is a biological illusion; in reality, time is a flexible dimension interwoven with space, measured by change, and its passage is relative and dependent on motion and entropy.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
You are completely wrong about time. You
probably think you know what it is
because you look at a watch or you feel
yourself getting older. But that isn't
time. That's just a sensation, a
biological trick. Most people walk
around with this poetic idea in their
heads that time is a river. You imagine
it flows, sweeping you along from the
past through the present and into the
future. You think it moved. But here is
the problem with that beautiful image.
If time is a river, how fast does the
river flow? 1 second per second. That is
meaningless. That's like saying a table
is one table long. It tells you
absolutely nothing about the nature of
reality. The truth is much stranger,
much more mechanical and honestly a lot
less romantic than a flowing stream.
Time doesn't flow. Time doesn't push you
anywhere. And if you think you have a
good grip on how time works just because
you can count seconds in your head, you
are in for a very rude awakening. Let's
start with what goes on inside your
brain because that is where the
confusion begins. You think your
internal clock is a reliable instrument.
It isn't. It is a chaotic mess of
translation scheme. Consider a simple
experiment. Try to count to 60 seconds
in your head. Just sit there and count.
1 2 3. You think you are tracking time,
but what you are really doing is running
a very specific, very personal program.
Some of you, when you count, you hear a
voice in your head. You are literally
speaking to yourself, subvocalizing 1 2
3. If someone interrupts you and asks
you to speak, you lose your count. The
machine jams. But others, and this is
where it gets interesting, don't hear a
voice at all. They see images. They
might see a tape measure with numbers on
it clicking past like a ticker tape.
Clink, clink, clink. If you use that
visual tape measure system, you can
actually read a newspaper or check a
laundry list while you count time. You
can sort your socks, look at patterns in
the weaving, and still keep that mental
tape measure clicking perfectly. But the
person who counts with a voice, they
can't read a word without losing track
of the time. This tells us something
fundamental. What you experience as the
passage of time is just a mental
construct, a pattern matching game your
brain plays. It varies wildly from
person to person. It is not a universal
constant. It is a biological
hallucination. So when we talk about
physics, when we talk about the
universe, we have to throw your brain
out the window. We have to stop talking
about how it feels and start talking
about what it actually is. In
[clears throat] physics, we have to be
operational. That means we don't ask
what is the essence of time because that
is a question for philosophers who enjoy
arguing over coffee. We ask how do we
measure it and the answer is almost
disappointingly simple. Time is just a
way of ordering events. That's it. It is
a labeling system. Imagine you have a
deck of cards. You lay them out in a
row. You can say the jack is before the
queen and the king is after the queen.
The cards aren't moving. The table isn't
flowing. The order is just a structural
property of how the cards are arranged.
Time is the table. Events are the cards.
When we say time passes, we are just
reading the cards from left to right.
This brings us to the biggest mistake
everyone makes. You think time is a
container. You imagine the universe is a
big empty box and time is a clock on the
wall of that box ticking away even if
the box is empty. You think that if we
removed all the stars, all the planets,
all the atoms, and all the light, time
would keep ticking. Tick, tick, tick.
Wrong. This is the Newtonian view, and
it is dead. Time is not a background
stage. Time is a measure of change. If
absolutely nothing in the universe
changes, no atoms vibrate, no light
moves, no energy shifts, then time
stops. It ceases to have meaning. You
cannot define a second without a
physical process to mark it. A swinging
pendulum, a vibrating quartz crystal, a
seesium atom oscillating. Time is not
separate from the stuff in the universe.
Time is a property of the stuff. This is
where your intuition fights back. You
say, "Okay, but surely time acts on
things. Time makes me get older. Time
causes the milk to spoil." No, it
doesn't. This is a linguistic trap. Time
is not an agent. Time doesn't have
hands. It doesn't reach into the fridge
and sour your milk. Bacteria do that.
Chemical reactions do that. Entropy does
that. Time is just the bookkeeping
system we use to track the rate at which
those reactions happen. Saying time did
it is like saying inches built the
house. Inches didn't build anything.
Carpenters inches just tell you where
the walls are. Time is the ruler, not
the worker. Let's push this ruler
analogy further because this is where
things get really weird. If time is just
a ruler we use to measure the distance
between events, what happens if the
ruler itself is flexible? This isn't
science fiction. This is measurable
fact. We used to think that a second was
a second anywhere in the universe. If
you had a clock on Earth and a clock on
Mars, they would tick tock in perfect
unison. It feels obvious. It feels right
and it is completely false. The rate at
which clocks tick depends on where they
are and how fast they are moving. This
is not a mechanical failure of the
clock. It is a fundamental feature of
reality. Imagine you are driving a car
across a giant flat sheet of paper. You
can drive north or you can drive east.
If you drive purely north, you are
making maximum progress in the northward
direction. But if you turn the steering
wheel and start driving northeast, you
are sharing your speed. You are moving a
bit north and a bit east. You aren't
going north as fast as you were before
because you diverted some of that motion
to the east. Now replace north with time
and east with space. This is the essence
of relativity. You are always moving
through the universe at a constant
speed. But that motion is shared between
space and time. If you sit perfectly
still in your chair, you are dedicating
all your motion to moving through time.
You are traveling into the future at
maximum speed, 1 second per second. But
the moment you stand up and walk or get
in a rocket and fly, you are diverting
some of that motion into space. You are
moving through space, which means you
must mathematically must move slower
through time. Your clock slows down.
Your aging slows down. You aren't
breaking the machine. You are just
changing direction on the map. If you
could move at the speed of light, which
is the maximum speed limit of the
universe, you would be using 100% of
your motion for space. You would have
zero motion left for time. For a photon
of light, time does not pass. It is born
and absorbed in the same instant of its
own perspective. The universe is frozen.
Now, you might be thinking, "Well, I
don't feel my watch slowing down when I
run for the bus." Of course not. You are
too slow. You are a biological snail.
The effects are tiny at human speeds,
but they are real. We have to program
satellites with this math. Lightites are
moving fast. So, their time is different
from your time. We literally have to
adjust their clock motion. There is
another aspect of time that tricks us.
And it comes back to that counting socks
problem. The idea of pattern
recognition. We perceive time as having
a direction, an arrow. Past is fixed,
future is open. You can remember
breakfast, but you can't remember
dinner. Why? If physics equations work
forwards and backwards, and most of them
do, why can't we remember the future? If
you film a planet orbiting a star and
play it backward, it looks perfectly
fine. It obeys all the laws of gravity.
But if you film an egg falling on the
floor and breaking and then play it
backward, everyone knows it's fake. The
yellow yolk doesn't leap off the floor,
assemble itself into a ball, and seal
itself inside a shell. Here's the
secret. This isn't about time itself.
It's about probability. It's about
disorder. It is much, much easier to
break an egg than to build one. There
are a billion ways for an egg to be
broken. Scattered here, splattered
there, shell in three pieces, shell in a
thousand pieces. But there is only one
specific arrangement where the egg is
whole. So as things move and interact,
they naturally stumble from the
organized state, few options, to the
disorganized state, many options. We
call this entropy. And this is the only
reason you feel an arrow of time. You
are watching the universe shuffle the
deck of cards. You started with a
perfectly ordered deck and every second
that ticks by is just the universe
shuffling it a bit more. You can't
unshuffle the deck just by hoping. This
means that your sensation of time
flowing is actually just your brain
registering the increase of messiness in
the universe. You are a disorder
detector. When you distinguish the past
from the future, you are really just
distinguishing less messy from more
messy. If the universe were in a state
of maximum mess, maximum entropy, where
everything was evenly spread out and
nothing interesting was happening, your
brain wouldn't be able to tell the past
from the future. There would be no egg
to break. There would be no memory to
form. In a thermal equilibrium universe,
the arrow of time vanishes. So, let's go
back to those people counting in their
heads. The ones seeing the tape measure
versus the ones hearing the voice. They
are both struggling to impose a rigid
linear structure on a universe that is
actually much more flexible. We build
these mental models, these counting
machines because we need to survive. We
need to know when the tiger is coming or
when the harvest is ready. We evolved to
track duration, but we did not evolve to
understand the dimension of time. Our
brains are efficient, not accurate. We
focus on the now because that is where
we live. But in physics, now is a very
slippery concept. If you and I are
standing next to each other, our now is
effectively the same. But if you are on
a planet a million light years away and
you start walking away from me, your
definition of now slices through the
universe at a different angle than mine.
What you consider to be happening right
now might be in my future. What I
consider right now might be in your
past. There is no universal now that
covers the whole universe like a
blanket. The universe is a block of
events, a four-dimensional loaf of
bread. And how you slice that loaf
depends on how fast you are moving. This
is hard to grasp. It feels wrong. It
feels like I'm telling you that up is
down. But that is because you are trying
to translate the high-level language of
the universe into the low-level language
of your biology. You are trying to count
socks when you should be measuring light
beam. When you try to force the universe
to fit your intuition, you get
confusion. You get paradoxes. But when
you let go of what you think time is,
when you stop trying to count it like a
pile of laundry and start measuring it
like a dimension of space, suddenly the
equations work. Suddenly the universe
makes sense. We are not done because
even if we accept that time is a
dimension and that it stretches and
squashes with speed, there is a much
deeper question lurking at the bottom of
the well. We talked about measuring time
and we talked about the arrow of
disorder, but we haven't talked about
the beginning. If time is a measure of
change, what happens when you run the
movie backward all the way to the first
frame? If the universe is expanding and
we wind it back, it gets smaller and
smaller, hotter and hotter. Eventually,
you hit a point where the laws of
physics themselves start to melt. You
see, all our clocks, our atoms, our
planets, our light beams, they exist
inside the universe. But if the universe
itself was born in a moment we call the
big bang, does it make sense to ask what
happened before that? This is the
ultimate test of your new definition of
time. If time is just a way of ordering
events inside the universe, then asking
what happened before the universe might
be as nonsensical as asking what is
north of the North Pole. It sounds like
a valid question grammatically, but
geometrically it is gibberish. There is
no north of the North Pole. There may be
no time before time began. And yet we
still have that nagging feeling, that
internal counter, that voice counting 1
2 3. We desperately want the universe to
have a backstory. We want a timeline
that stretches back forever. It is hard
to accept that the tape measure might
just start, that the counting machine
had an on switch. This creates a
friction between our psychology and our
cosmology. We are finite beings trying
to comprehend the infinite using tools
made of meat and electricity. It is a
wonder we understand anything at all.
Consider the patterns again. The person
who sees the tape measure in their head
can count while reading because they are
using different circuits. Visual versus
verbal. Physics is the same. Classical
mechanics was the verbal counting. It
worked for day-to-day stuff. Relativity
is the visual tape measure. It allows us
to process complex patterns that the old
way couldn't handle. We are constantly
upgrading our mental software to match
the hardware of reality. And the upgrade
process is painful. It requires
discarding ideas we love like the river
of time. But here is the beautiful part.
Even though your intuition is wrong,
even though your internal clock is a
biological hack, and even though time is
a flexible, relative, bendy dimension
rather than a strict metronome, it still
works for you. You can still boil an egg
usually. You can still meet a friend for
coffee at 2 p.m. The weirdness of
relativity is hidden under the hood. You
don't need to understand the combustion
engine to drive the car, and you don't
need to understand space-time metrics to
live your life. But isn't it better to
know? Isn't it better to know that the
engine is there? This brings us back to
that strange experiment with the
counting. Remember the difference
between the person who hears numbers and
the person who sees them? This is not
just a party trick. It reveals a
terrifying gap in how we understand the
universe. When two people talk to each
other about something complex like time
or relativity or love, they think they
are speaking the same language. They
nod. They agree. They say, "I
understand." But what is really
happening? You are running a massive
invisible translation scheme. You take
the words I say and convert them into
your private internal imagery, which
might be completely different from mine.
I say 1 minute and I see a clock face.
You hear a voice saying 60 seconds. We
arrive at the same answer, so we think
we agree, but the machinery inside is
totally alien. This matters for physics
because it exposes the fragility of
common sense. Common sense is just the
collection of prejudices you acquired by
age 18. It is built on your specific
internal imagery. If your mental image
of time is a tape with numbers on it,
you will struggle to understand how time
can bend. If your mental image is a
voice counting, you will struggle to
understand how time can be spatial. When
we try to teach you about the quantum
vacuum or the curvature of spacetime, we
aren't just giving you new facts. We are
asking you to delete your operating
system. We are asking you to throw away
the tape measure and silence the voice.
And that is why it feels so hard. That
is why your brain rejects it. You aren't
just learning. You are translating
against the grain of your own biology.
So let's try to break that biology one
more time. We talked about how time
slows down when you move. But there is a
consequence of that which is even more
disturbing. It destroys the concept of
simultaneity. Imagine you have two very
long poles miles apart. You decide to
flash a light on top of both poles at
the exact same instant. Now you see them
flash together. Simple. But now imagine
a spaceship flying past you at half the
speed of light. To the person in the
spaceship, those flashes do not happen
at the same time. They will measure
absolutely correctly using perfect
instruments that one pole flashed before
the other. Who is right? You or the
spaceship? You are both right. This is
the part that breaks the human brain. We
are obsessed with the idea of a
universal now. We think that right now
something is happening on Mars. But
right now is not a physical reality. It
is a coordinate choice. If you change
your speed, you slice the loaf of
spaceime at a different angle. You
literally change what events are
considered simultaneous. This means
there is no universal master clock
ticking in the background of the cosmo.
There is no God's eyee view where
everything happens in a neat sequence.
The order of events can actually flip
depending on how you move. Cause and
effect usually stay safe, but the timing
the timing is up for grabs. If now is
relative and time is just a dimension
like space, this leads to a conclusion
that makes the river of time look like a
nursery rhyme, we call it the block. If
time is a dimension, then the past, the
present, and the future all exist
simultaneously. Think of a movie reel.
You watch the movie frame by frame, so
it feels like a story unfolding. But if
you hold the reel in your hand, the end
of the movie exists at the same time as
the beginning. The frames are all there,
frozen and plastic. The only thing
moving is the light of the projector. In
this analogy, your consciousness is the
light. The events of your life, your
birth, your breakfast this morning, your
death, they are all just frames on the
real. They already exist. They always
have. This is why physicists sometimes
say the flow of time is an illusion. We
don't mean it's fake. We mean it's a
perspective trick. The dinosaur that
died 66 million years ago is not gone in
the sense of being erased from reality.
It is just at a different coordinate
down the road in the time dimension.
Just because New York is far away from
you doesn't mean New York ceases to
exist. It's just elsewhere. The past is
just elsewhere in time. The future is
elsewhere in the other direction. The
structure is static. The experience is
dynamic. Now you might ask, if the
future already exists, do I have free
will? That is the wrong question. That
is a philosopher's question. The
physicist's question is, does the system
allow for predictability? And the answer
is messy. Remember the egg breaking?
That's entropy. The future is the
direction of more mess. Even if the
block is static, the patterns inside the
block follow rules. You can't just jump
to the end of the movie because the
frames between here and there are the
necessary steps to build that future.
You are the process. You are not a
passenger riding through time. You are
the chemical reaction that is time. You
are the shuffling of the deck. Let's go
back to the counting experiment one last
time because there is a hidden lesson
there about capability. The person who
could visualize the tape measure could
do something the voice counter couldn't.
He could read and count at the same
time. He had a parallel processing power
because his internal imagery was
different. Physics gives you that power.
When you stop translating the universe
into rivers and flows and start seeing
it as geometry, as math, as structure,
you gain a superpower. You can see how
black holes stop time. You can see how
gravity is just the bending of the map.
You stop being a victim of the illusion
and start becoming a reader of the map.
And yet, we must be humble. We talked
about how we store information. Vessel
functions, exponentials, electric
fields. We learn these fancy terms. We
write down these symbols and we think we
have captured reality. But remember, the
guy next to you might be storing that
same vessel function using a completely
different mental image. He might see a
vibrating drum head while you see a
squiggly line. We are all just blind
people touching an elephant, describing
it to each other in languages we barely
understand. The math work that is always
always a translation. We found that
simple counting to a minute is
susceptible to all kinds of external
factors and internal methods. If our
sense of a mere 60 seconds is that
unstable, imagine how unstable our sense
of eternity or beginning. We ask how did
the universe begin? And we expect a
story like once upon a time. But the
universe doesn't work in story. It works
in states. It works in field. It works
in ways that might not even have a
before. We are trying to count the socks
of the universe. But the universe isn't
wearing socks. It's weaving the fabric
itself. So what is time? Time is the
thing that stops everything from
happening at once. Time is the heat
death of the universe waiting to happen.
Time is the curvature of space caused by
matter. But most importantly, time is
the mirror. It reflects the limitations
of your own brain. When you look at a
clock, you aren't seeing time. You are
seeing a machine designed to comfort
you. You are seeing a regulator for your
society. Real time, physical time, is a
wild untamed beast that moves at
different speeds, stops near black
holes, and might not even flow at all.
If this makes your head hurt, good. That
means the translation scheme is breaking
down. That means you are starting to see
the cracks in the wall of common sense.
Don't be afraid of the confusion. In
science, confusion is not a dead end. It
is the starting line. It means you are
about to discard a comfortable lie for a
difficult truth. Time is not what you
think it is. It is so much more. And the
fact that we little biological machines
made of stardust and anxiety can figure
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
