0:00 our country is going to go broke faster
0:03 because of AI and Robotics that is
0:06 likely to happen there's going to be
0:08 great disruption I can vibrantly feel
0:11 the energy in the biotech world in the
0:14 AI World technology and AI is going to
0:17 be a force and it's a Tailwind the
0:21 question is is the Tailwind greater than
0:23 the head wind listen I'm the guy who not
0:25 the Glass isn't half full the glass is
0:27 overflowing I'm Mr optimism abundance
0:30 but reading your book it's got me
0:33 thinking a lot as we take 1 2 3 4 5
0:37 years do you think you're not going to
0:39 have an economic downturn do you think
0:41 you're not going to have a bare Market
0:43 really how do you think about China we
0:45 are at war with China and you cannot
0:48 lose the
0:51 war everybody Welcome to moonshots today
0:54 my guest is none other than Ray doio the
0:57 founder of Bridgewater the world's
0:59 largest hedge fund with $130 billion
1:02 under management I asked Ry about why he
1:05 holds gold over Bitcoin the impact of AI
1:08 and Robotics on the global economy and
1:11 on the US economy his advice for
1:13 entrepreneurs building tech companies
1:16 over the next one to two years we'll
1:18 talk about China and we'll talk about
1:20 the world ahead uh it's a fascinating
1:23 conversation with one of the smartest
1:24 thinkers ever particular on his new book
1:28 how countries go broke and being in the
1:30 United States I want to know what's the
1:32 impact on me and you as an entrepreneur
1:35 right let's dive in Ray good evening uh
1:38 you're on the other side of the planet
1:40 I'm in Santa Monica you're in Abu Dhabi
1:42 right now is that correct yeah well
1:45 welcome to moonshots my friend uh it's a
1:47 pleasure to see you I I I normally run
1:49 into you in in Riad or in in the
1:52 Emirates sometimes in New York and I
1:55 have to say I've been so looking forward
1:57 to this conversation uh I think the work
2:00 that you have been doing recently uh and
2:04 and writing about you know how countries
2:06 go broke will dive into that really on
2:09 the back of the uh the changing World
2:11 Order uh as individuals as entrepreneurs
2:15 who are really focusing on AI and
2:17 Robotics and Longevity or think about of
2:19 course the future uh a lot of us really
2:23 want to have a stable World in which to
2:26 build our
2:27 dreams uh and
2:30 I think it's important for folks to
2:32 understand the cycles that
2:34 humanity and countries go through to
2:38 help them get a sense of where things
2:41 are
2:42 going uh so no one better than
2:47 you well I don't know about that but
2:49 I'll do my best all right well let let's
2:52 jump in I and in particular I you've
2:56 charted what you what you describe as
2:59 sort of the five major forces that are
3:01 driving uh the health and wealth of
3:05 Nations uh could you give us an overview
3:08 of those um yeah and I will also uh just
3:13 touch on how I came by them please um
3:16 I'm a global macro investor and I've
3:18 been for over 50 years a global macro
3:21 investor and that's taken me to all
3:22 different countries and seeing how the
3:25 systems work and I'm also very much a
3:28 systems mechanic person cause effect how
3:31 does the machine work kind of person and
3:34 what I learned through my experiences is
3:37 that um sometimes when I was really
3:40 surprised I was surprised because the
3:42 things that happened to me didn't happen
3:45 in my lifetime but they happened in
3:47 history MH so there were three things
3:52 about five or six years ago that didn't
3:55 happen in our lifetimes and um
4:00 let me go back and find the cycles of
4:05 Rises and declines of Reserve currencies
4:07 and countries and
4:09 Empires and uh the first three and then
4:12 I discovered really the other two or
4:13 realized the other two the first was um
4:16 of course I I knew about the debt
4:19 money um economy market cycle right and
4:24 we we know that there's a short-term
4:26 cycle uh we know what that's like you
4:28 have a recession inflation is down they
4:31 put Credit in credit is buying power
4:34 they buy uh things go up financial
4:37 markets go up everything goes up um you
4:39 get to uh limited capacity inflation
4:42 Rises they raise interest rates but then
4:44 okay we've been through 13 of the we're
4:47 in the 13th of those Cycles but there's
4:50 also a a big long-term debt cycle that
4:55 takes place
4:56 over 80 years give or take about 30 debt
5:00 Rises relative to incomes and then
5:03 there's a limitation to that so we're
5:05 going to get into that in a minute the
5:07 second cycle it very much goes with that
5:11 is the political or also the internal
5:15 order disorder cycle so when you go
5:18 through that cycle there are larger
5:20 wealth and values gaps that um
5:24 increasingly create greater and greater
5:28 conflicts the left and the right
5:30 populism of the left populism of the
5:32 right and
5:34 a um a a fight between the two and is
5:38 that is that typically also an 80-year
5:41 like
5:42 cycle um
5:44 it's um they coincide they don't
5:47 necessarily have to be but they are
5:49 usually together so for example uh this
5:53 cycle the last cycle began they they
5:55 have wars and that's what uh ends the
5:58 cycle and so World War II was also
6:02 accompanied by
6:04 many breakdowns of domestic orders and
6:07 new Waters new systems that came into
6:11 Power um sometimes they were just total
6:14 revolutions sometimes they did not break
6:16 in in the case of the United States and
6:19 the UK we didn't have a new order new
6:23 domestic order but there was a lot of
6:25 internal fighting and you came out but
6:27 in most other country's cases they
6:30 happened at the same time there was a
6:32 total breakdown of the order and new
6:33 orders came
6:35 about I'm G to at some at some point
6:37 later I want to get into the
6:38 conversation how tied is this to human
6:40 life lifespan
6:43 um there's
6:45 um there is um an um I I believe an
6:50 important element that's tied to the
6:52 human lifespan because these things only
6:55 happen once in a lifetime typically so
6:59 we don't learn the lessons about war and
7:02 those things you know it's something
7:04 like also you know the idea of three
7:06 generations to rag Leafs the rag Leaf
7:08 kind of thing um but um it is definitely
7:12 the case by all measures that we say why
7:16 don't we learn well because we never
7:19 experienced it before and so I remember
7:22 my my parents used to you know they were
7:24 born during the
7:26 Depression effectively or the tail end
7:29 and it changed the way they're W they
7:31 were wired that's right yeah my dad my
7:34 my dad um and almost everybody at the
7:38 depression came out of that wanting to
7:41 save turn the lights off son eat that
7:44 food right because the power of saving
7:47 and the security and he never could buy
7:51 stocks and uh and so and if you looked
7:55 at the yield it was very
7:57 interesting the yield on stocks the
8:01 dividend and earnings yields um were
8:05 were both um about twice the yield on
8:08 bonds so from a investment point of view
8:11 they had to go down in order to provide
8:14 the same Total return made no sense but
8:17 that was their mindset was a
8:19 reflection of the I don't want to own
8:22 those risky things I want to save work
8:26 hard and so on and that's part of the
8:28 cycle
8:30 so so the third so that's the second
8:34 this internal order disorder which as
8:37 you point out is they're all all these
8:40 parts of the cycle are related so that M
8:44 mentality affected the how we saved and
8:46 spend and and so on so forth the third
8:49 part of the cycle uh what I call the big
8:52 cycle is um the international World
8:56 Order who is the dominant power so in
9:00 other words you have a
9:02 war and then you come out of the war and
9:05 you say who sets the rules well the
9:07 winner sets the rules and that is the
9:10 New World Order and so the United States
9:14 set the rules that's why the dollar is
9:16 the reserve currency that's why the
9:18 World Bank the IMF uh the uh United
9:23 Nations yeah United Nations they're all
9:25 in the United States right because that
9:28 was the New World Order and we created a
9:31 a an order is a type of system okay in
9:34 which there's collaboration the idea was
9:37 anyway that was that order when then
9:39 when you have a rising power challenging
9:42 an existing power uh uh you know there's
9:45 no world court that you plead your case
9:47 to and then they say okay you win and
9:50 we're going to go by your rules or
9:51 something there's no International
9:53 Constitution or something might is right
9:57 and so then you have who has the might
10:00 and you have the war so that's the third
10:02 Major Force tending to follow that same
10:06 Arc the the fourth which isn't the same
10:10 doesn't have the same 80-year kind of
10:13 cycle to it big cycle to it but it but
10:15 it's a big force and it's a bigger
10:18 Force um than the first three because
10:20 it's killed more people and it's toppled
10:23 more world and domestic orders and that
10:26 is climate and and acts of nature
10:29 acts of nature droughts floods and
10:32 pandemics have killed more people and
10:35 Chang toppled more World orders okay and
10:38 certainly it's a big deal now you know
10:41 when you when you speak about climate
10:42 most people go to you know the current
10:45 climate crisis but you're really talking
10:47 about the long cycles of climate causing
10:50 drought causing starvation basically
10:52 just ending ending Nations yes
10:57 yeah and then
10:59 um and then there's number
11:02 five um which I which is um is man's
11:09 inventiveness in all of its various ways
11:12 particularly technology but that
11:15 inventiveness and so it looks something
11:18 like this right which I mean what I mean
11:23 is
11:24 technology inventiveness you don't lose
11:27 it you you rise
11:30 build on itself upward force and it's a
11:33 great upward Force now and then there
11:36 are these Cycles like the business cycle
11:39 and the political cycle left right left
11:41 you know we um we had the left and now
11:44 we have the right now we have the left
11:46 and so on and these economic Cycles are
11:49 those and then there's the big cycle
11:52 which is like that to GDP and that those
11:54 kinds of things so that's visually how
11:57 it looks to me and everything that we
12:00 talk
12:01 about um although there is one other
12:04 Force but almost everything that we talk
12:07 about uh is one of those five and that
12:11 you drop down so whenever you're asking
12:13 me anybody we will go into one of those
12:16 five and you could almost see where you
12:18 are in the cycle and they all relate to
12:21 each other right so tariffs relates to
12:24 economics relates to you know
12:26 geopolitics oh the six Force which I
12:29 didn't mention but it's also very very
12:32 destined is demographics of course yeah
12:36 we have a silver tsunami we have an
12:37 aging populace uh and we have uh growing
12:42 I mean it's interesting right because
12:43 these are uh the the age
12:47 demographics uh are I think I'm thinking
12:50 they play a much bigger role today than
12:52 they ever have and will and will yeah
12:56 everybody Peter here if you're enjoying
12:58 this episode please help me get the
13:01 message of abundance out to the world
13:03 we're truly living during the most
13:04 extraordinary time ever in human history
13:07 and I want to get this mindset out to
13:09 everyone please subscribe and follow
13:12 wherever you get your podcasts and turn
13:14 on notifications so we can let you know
13:16 when the next episode is being dropped
13:18 all right back to our episode I want to
13:21 get into something and then get into the
13:23 uh the five um uh the five stages of the
13:28 of the big dead cycle you write about
13:30 and I want to dive into something
13:31 instantly here which has been bothering
13:34 me I I did not get a good night's sleep
13:36 thinking about this last night uh as we
13:39 get ready which is our country is going
13:41 to go broke faster because of AI and
13:44 Robotics so if I understand this
13:46 correctly right the federal reserve's
13:49 mandate is basically to juggle jobs and
13:53 inflation right uh provide maximum jobs
13:56 maximum employment stable prices
13:59 moderate long-term interest rates and
14:02 and traditionally you lower interest
14:04 rates that boosts employment because
14:08 companies can borrow cheaply that expand
14:10 operation that hire more work more
14:13 workers and that's been the game up
14:16 until recently now you've got uh Optimus
14:21 humanoid robot and figure you know the
14:24 prediction right now is we'll have
14:27 billions of them by the mid 2030s you
14:30 know elon's prediction when I
14:32 interviewed him at uh uh at fi in Riad
14:37 it was you know 10 billion by 2040 you
14:40 had Sam wman tweet out yesterday that
14:43 their 03 Mini model um and their deep
14:46 research Tech will start displacing
14:49 singled digigit uh employee you know
14:52 white collar workers right away I
14:55 interviewed uh mark benof on this
14:57 podcast I don't know two weeks ago he
14:59 said listen with uh with salesforce's
15:02 new agent technology we're 30% more
15:06 productive and are hiring no new
15:08 engineers and so the question becomes
15:11 you know as we're marching forward here
15:15 if a company has access to lower
15:16 interest rates wouldn't they just buy
15:19 more robots and hire more AI agents and
15:22 thereby you know reduce labor and sort
15:26 of create this massive decoupling
15:29 compared to what had been the the
15:30 process yeah uh um it is I think
15:35 virtually certain but that's even that's
15:37 debatable but it is virtually certain
15:41 that it will replace a lot of people and
15:46 that uh what we've been seeing in the
15:50 form of a wealth impact of
15:53 technology in which there's um small
15:56 population that has unicorns and it's
15:58 the most most wonderful world that we
16:00 can possibly imagine to be in um also we
16:04 have a population in the United States
16:06 where 60% of the population has below a
16:10 sixth grade reading level and and is
16:14 pretty broke and
16:16 so that is likely to uh happen there's
16:20 going to be great disruption and then
16:23 the question and the question for all of
16:26 these things is how are we going to deal
16:29 with each other I mean the number one
16:31 question on all five of these and
16:35 demographics is how do you and I and we
16:39 deal with each other so that um we're
16:44 not just dealing with in a greedy way of
16:47 our of our own self because you can have
16:51 a
16:51 great civil war or a conflict due to not
16:56 managing such social issues and those
16:59 social
17:00 issues um are difficult to manage
17:05 because everybody has a polarity
17:07 regarding those social issues I I'm
17:10 going to go a step deeper here because
17:13 traditionally you would hire workers
17:16 that would get money in their pockets
17:19 they would start consuming that would
17:22 fuel demand they would pay down
17:24 corporate and government debts and the
17:27 challenge again is again in coming from
17:32 your recent work uh you how governments
17:35 go broke um if workers aren't seeing
17:40 wage growth and aren't getting jobs then
17:43 who's driving
17:45 consumption and
17:47 then how does that drive uh our economy
17:51 I guess the question is well is it going
17:54 to accelerate uh your predictions on the
17:58 challenges well the techn the
18:01 technology advances are a two-edged
18:04 sword the way I think it is it's going
18:06 to raise productivity it's going to
18:07 raise output for manh hour sure okay um
18:12 and that's a good thing and that power
18:15 of that good thing you know means you
18:18 have you don't have to work as much or
18:20 you anyway or you get more out of that
18:24 uh result and um then it becomes
18:29 what do you do with the
18:31 distribution of that right yeah
18:36 so um so it becomes a how are
18:41 you like with each other to deal with
18:46 these incredible disruption effects I
18:49 would say I just also I want to say uh
18:52 something I um I think that we all think
18:58 we're
18:59 optimizing for the things that those
19:02 Technologies get
19:04 us in other words wouldn't it is it'll
19:07 be wonderful our life expectancy
19:10 Rises um we become smarter all of these
19:14 wonderful things who could argue about
19:16 their life expectancy rising and so on
19:19 and sometimes we lose
19:22 sight that that may not even be the most
19:26 important things in a world
19:29 that's in
19:31 Conflict um and so on so if you look I
19:34 did a I did a study of the well-being of
19:37 24 top countries using a lot of
19:40 Statistics it's by the way it's online
19:42 anybody could see it it's a great Powers
19:45 measures and it's very interesting that
19:48 um I measure different measures of
19:51 power income military power education
19:55 power different types of power um and
19:58 then I measure happiness MH and I
20:01 measure
20:03 health and past a certain basic level
20:07 there is no
20:09 correlation
20:11 between um per income and happiness and
20:15 health yeah I I remember that that
20:17 number was around
20:19 $70,000 or thereabouts for H for
20:23 happiness um it's it actually is
20:26 considerably less than that number I
20:28 don't know what it is but I know like
20:30 for example
20:32 Indonesia I was thinking for the United
20:34 States yeah yeah has a much happier uh
20:37 population and in terms of per capita
20:40 income and in terms of health it's much
20:42 lower but they have a much happier
20:46 population um I I I don't I I I would
20:49 have to go back and check sort of how
20:51 but it's more mostly above um that which
20:55 is needed to have to be out of pain you
20:59 know
21:00 to right and the United States in terms
21:04 of
21:05 health has a fiveyear lesser life
21:09 expectancy than Canada and comparable
21:11 income countries you know in other words
21:14 the developed countries yeah so and and
21:16 if we think back in time were your
21:20 parents that we knew my parents MH were
21:24 they less happy or well off and then
21:27 think about what the hell of wars and
21:29 things are so there it's it's not just
21:33 optimized by
21:35 technology and okay I get more life we
21:38 have to pay attention to these other
21:40 things too so so part of the question
21:42 becomes is there is there going to be a
21:45 new type of social contract that's going
21:47 to have to be created I mean I do
21:49 believe and and I write about this and I
21:51 think about this a lot that technology
21:54 is a force that turns whatever was
21:55 scarce into abundance right we've
21:57 created massive energy abundance and
22:00 food abundance to the point where where
22:02 o obesity is thing you issue abundance
22:05 of information abundance of all the
22:07 entertainment you could possibly want
22:09 abundance of almost every there's very
22:12 little that if you pushed me I couldn't
22:15 paint a picture of increasing abundance
22:17 even life uh the amount of things you
22:20 can do per unit time um per second dur
22:24 today so the efficiency of the of how we
22:27 spend our time
22:30 uh but even with that increasing
22:34 abundance uh if people are unhappy and
22:37 it turns us towards civil Strife then
22:40 we've got real issues yeah I think um I
22:45 think that we can agree um on the fact
22:50 that the technology and AI is going to
22:53 be a force and it's a
22:56 tailwind and then we also have to
22:59 realize that the other four or five
23:02 forces are big
23:04 headwinds and the question is is the
23:07 Tailwind greater than the headwind in
23:10 the appropriate time and oh so so when I
23:13 think about that um we'll we'll get into
23:16 the debt problem okay we're going to
23:17 have an an
23:19 immediate we're going to come into
23:21 budget
23:22 season um and we will over the next
23:25 several months and if they don't do
23:27 something we're going to have a major
23:29 debt problem and we'll talk about that
23:31 in a minute but it's a headwind yeah the
23:34 internal conflict is a headwind the
23:37 external geopolitical conflict is a
23:39 headwind the climate thing is a headwind
23:43 the demographic thing is a headwind so
23:46 now when I think of the Miracles that
23:48 I've experienced when I'm when I let's
23:50 say um and you've
23:53 experienced I remember when I used to do
23:57 charts
23:59 that I would literally do charts with a
24:01 ruler and colored
24:03 pencils and graph paper sure and I
24:06 remember when the calculator came along
24:10 and I remember when spreadsheets came
24:14 along and I remember the computer really
24:18 that came along and so when we think of
24:22 digitalization and devices and so on
24:26 they were pretty amazing
24:29 let's say over a really let's say a 35e
24:32 period and so on so when we think about
24:36 I mean they were revolutionary right and
24:39 connectivity instantaneously wow and
24:42 then we live our lives we're born we get
24:44 older we die we live right yes okay um
24:48 and so then I think okay what force will
24:53 this be this AI Revolution t as a
24:58 multiple of the force that we
25:01 experienced
25:03 from uh rulers and colored pencils and
25:06 and going to spreadsheets and being able
25:08 to do models what what factor will that
25:11 force that that was one hell of a force
25:15 and when I look at the Industrial
25:16 Revolution and I look at these things
25:18 now I think it's going to be a bigger
25:20 Revolution yeah but when we actually say
25:23 okay what is its magnitude I'm sort of
25:26 like I don't know if it's 1.2 25 or or
25:30 1.5 what the other one was cuz man it it
25:33 when you look back on it it may not look
25:35 big when you're in it and you imagine
25:38 the future like this is and then we have
25:40 the headwinds and we have a timing issue
25:43 okay because that baby better come on
25:46 and we better get there in time so I
25:49 think about what the 20s were like the
25:52 20s was the most patents the most
25:54 Innovation and then we came to 29 in the
25:57 Great Depression I think of the bubbles
26:00 that have been in quite often they were
26:02 matched also with the greatest
26:04 Innovations so we cannot just simply say
26:08 that these Innovations will necessarily
26:10 quickly and in time create such a
26:13 productivity miracle that the others
26:16 don't matter demographics and you know
26:18 okay there's going to a lot of be a lot
26:20 of people who go from working to needing
26:23 you know and and and so on who ain't
26:26 going to be productive and and are going
26:27 to be needing
26:28 so I don't know how that works exactly I
26:31 am impressed with it but I don't know
26:34 exactly yeah I I had this conversation
26:36 with Neil degrass Tyson who was saying
26:38 we're having the conversation exactly
26:39 that every generation feels like they're
26:42 at the most extraordinary period of
26:44 technological and societal growth ever
26:47 right it it it feel it feels it feels
26:50 that way I mean the the stuff that is
26:53 coming Ray that is I think I have to
26:57 believe it's transformational and the
26:59 question is is it unlike what it was in
27:02 the past in terms of the level degree of
27:05 transformation right I um okay let me
27:08 give you what it was for
27:10 me I computerized all my decision making
27:13 I have artificial intelligence decision
27:17 making data comes in um criteria are
27:20 specified orders get placed analysis is
27:24 done uh my decision making is um all
27:30 programmed um in ter literally in terms
27:32 of markets data comes in act things get
27:36 no people it's like one of those uh
27:38 factories that has just a few people
27:41 looking after it and everything happens
27:43 okay that came to me from the old world
27:47 way of thinking which I think most
27:49 people are still in which is I'm a smart
27:53 guy and I will make my
27:55 decisions okay we are still
27:59 a a long way from you turning it over to
28:03 the
28:04 AI
28:05 okay that decision there there is there
28:08 is debate there is debate but the
28:10 question what is what is a long way is
28:12 it is a long way three years five
28:15 years
28:17 years I find I find it so interesting
28:21 that so many people are users of
28:26 AI but they do
28:30 not follow
28:33 AI okay and if you ask it like if I ask
28:37 it um okay should I buy the um okay
28:42 tariffs came in and should I do this
28:44 this and this I get
28:47 okay I okay what would you do
28:51 okay I get bullsh because it still comes
28:54 back to understanding cause effect
28:56 relationships
28:58 you still have to it better understand
29:00 it and the question Human Relationships
29:03 Human Relationships sorry this this is
29:06 human emotional relationships well but
29:08 even even the relationship between do
29:11 you understand the mechanics of how the
29:15 tariffs affects this this this and the
29:17 other thing explain it to me and make
29:19 your would you how you run your company
29:22 or whatever you're a long way from
29:23 actually that decision making okay of
29:26 having the criteria and the cause effect
29:29 and that's even more so in the markets
29:31 because the markets are are are zero sum
29:35 game so in other words I have to be
29:37 better than the consensus to beat the
29:40 markets and so I'll get the consensus or
29:43 whatever it is I'll get that knowledge
29:44 but how do I get better anyway all I'm
29:47 saying is when we say we're going to
29:49 turn you know I'm going to turn it over
29:52 to there I I do believe that the idea of
29:56 it's an a partner
29:58 and a an associate and so on and it boy
30:02 it could teach you and it could do
30:04 wonderful things but as it but you need
30:07 this as a partner so I um and then we we
30:11 see where we go exactly but there's um
30:15 we we'll see I don't know anyway but
30:18 that's AI we agree a super plus for
30:21 productivity we agree a s super uh
30:25 probably divider in who benefits and who
30:28 doesn't and that it becomes a social
30:31 question as to how we deal with that not
30:34 just don't also assume that it is in an
30:38 environment of
30:40 law because laws are local laws are
30:44 within countries laws do not exist
30:48 between countries and so there are
30:51 competitions between countries to win at
30:54 all cost so I don't think it's going to
30:56 be regul ated or controlled and we also
31:00 have to look as it as a weapon because
31:03 it it can be a very important weapon too
31:06 and we'll get to that conversation about
31:08 us and China which I think is the
31:10 dominant conversation in that realm
31:13 right now before we get there um I want
31:16 to talk about this concept of abundance
31:17 I wrote a book 12 for let see 13 years
31:21 ago now called abundance the future is
31:23 better than you think um and the
31:26 argument for increasing I know the book
31:28 it's a good book thank you uh the
31:31 followon age of abundance is going to
31:33 come out in 26 but the the detail
31:37 looking at access to Food Water Energy
31:40 Health Care education almost every
31:42 particular factor and the demonetization
31:45 and democratization has been just off
31:48 the charts and
31:50 accelerating um you know we're on the
31:53 verge of fusion potentially you know the
31:56 the Chinese just had uh
31:58 held a fusion reaction for 18 minutes um
32:02 you know you've got helon and many
32:04 others looking at Fusion by turn of the
32:07 the decade here um solar exploding onto
32:10 the scene um and energy of course drives
32:15 everything else um so I guess the
32:18 question is when you think about
32:21 abundance as a concept for America and
32:24 Americans and for the world
32:28 um how do you how do you I'd like to
32:30 know how you think about that is it a
32:32 world of increasing abundance are there
32:34 factors that are going to basically shut
32:36 that down
32:39 um the factors that could shut it down
32:42 are the factors that shut it down
32:45 before um and they are in the um
32:48 conflict I mean if you look at how it
32:52 was shut down before the Industrial
32:54 Revolution or the great revolution of
32:57 the 19 20s when there were more patents
32:59 than any time and all of those times it
33:02 was a combination of an economic and um
33:07 and a war and and conflict but you
33:10 showed that you showed the technology is
33:11 a continuous Force that's right building
33:14 on itself despite the up and down Cycles
33:17 yes but the chart that you we
33:20 see looks
33:22 like looks like that and that and that
33:25 life that life expectance if you look at
33:28 life expectancy it looks like that if
33:30 you look at per GDP it looks like that
33:34 okay what
33:36 we upward
33:38 arcing that that upward arcing what you
33:41 don't see ironically when you look at
33:43 all of these things and you see The
33:46 Wiggles okay that's World War II and so
33:51 you hardly pay any attention to it but
33:54 it mattered okay you know it these wars
33:57 last maybe three years typically they
34:00 have and and so on and so you don't stop
34:05 that unless you destroy
34:07 mankind yes but you and you won't stop
34:11 that so when I say stop it I'm assuming
34:14 like what happened in the
34:17 30s slow down yeah yeah so you have yeah
34:21 you because you don't forget you still
34:24 have it you don't go
34:26 backwards um and then you build on that
34:29 but that upward movement um is slow like
34:34 if you had a bust now MH okay you could
34:39 imagine how that would change
34:40 allocations of money how that would
34:42 change Innovations and so on uh to some
34:45 extent I mean I think that uh we're in a
34:48 position that might be somewhat
34:50 analogous to 1998 or
34:54 1999 where um um
34:58 you know I'm digressing but um just to
35:01 complete bu right well yeah what happens
35:04 is assets become more and more
35:09 expensive and then there's a universal
35:13 view that that is a great miraculous
35:15 company and that's a great miraculous
35:18 thing and they're right it's great
35:21 miraculous company and a great
35:22 miraculous thing but um the question is
35:26 how much do it cost
35:28 and is it expensive and so what happens
35:31 is actually if as an
35:34 investor um you'd be much better off to
35:38 buy bad companies at good prices than
35:42 good companies at bad prices yeah when
35:44 when my mom starts telling me should I
35:46 buy this stock or my Uber driver starts
35:48 telling me about that you know you're in
35:50 trouble and and so if you look at
35:53 pricing and who is the owners and so on
35:57 I'm not saying we're there it looks more
35:59 like maybe
36:00 98 but you also have a situation if you
36:03 have that together with if you have an
36:07 interest rate change and we'll get into
36:09 the interest rate discussion in a minute
36:11 I suppose um you then have expensive and
36:15 you have interest rates and then you can
36:18 have what we had in 2000 you know and
36:22 pets.com and there's a sword all you
36:25 know and and things change and also so
36:27 we we get so um used
36:30 to that the
36:33 disruptors don't get
36:36 disrupted like that's funny isn't it I
36:40 mean like everybody they all get
36:42 disrupted of course it was interesting
36:44 when Jeff Bezos at one of his earnings
36:46 call said yeah Amazon might not exist in
36:49 30 years uh I mean it it shocked people
36:53 for him to say that and but that's I
36:55 mean like how wake up up like the Dow 30
36:59 you know go back 30 years go that back
37:02 20 years you know they didn't exist they
37:05 they don't exist any longer and the ones
37:07 that are on top do exist and that's the
37:09 nature of this evolutionary process the
37:13 structure am I'm still impressed that
37:15 Microsoft is is doing as well as it's
37:17 done for the last 50 years crazy or 40
37:22 years yeah U let's let's get into the
37:26 big dead cycle and the five stages you
37:29 break it down into and
37:31 again the the lens I'm coming at this
37:34 from is we have a lot of entrepreneurs
37:37 who are building companies and um and
37:41 when time is good you know we just
37:43 entered a new Administration where we've
37:46 got a pro technology Pro
37:49 m& uh you know mindset minimized
37:54 regulation and I'm just I vibrantly feel
37:59 the energy in the biotech world in the
38:02 AI world people are building building
38:04 building capitals beginning to flow
38:07 again um and and people are not looking
38:11 at what's likely to be coming in the
38:14 next two to five years they're just like
38:18 the time is good now borrow build go go
38:22 go um so H what's your advice to
38:26 entrepreneurs
38:28 right now and and let's do that in the
38:30 context of your of the five stages we're
38:33 in and I'd like to understand where you
38:34 think we are in the United States what's
38:36 the impact of that elon's having and
38:39 Doge you know can we can we hold off uh
38:45 these dead Cycles is there any chance
38:47 for that or is it just too far gone it's
38:50 a lot of questions but let's take it no
38:52 no um and I'll and I'll um uh I'll I'll
38:56 give you my thoughts on them I want to
38:58 emphasize before I do that that
39:02 study th this is the draft of my book
39:05 and it's free online so that people can
39:10 read about the cause effect
39:14 relationships
39:16 because the re I'm 75 years old I'm in a
39:19 stage of my life that I want to pass
39:20 along things that are valuable I'm not
39:23 earning money and that's not my goal
39:25 anymore uh any of that and um I want to
39:29 uh everything is cause effect
39:31 relationships there's mechanics to it
39:33 and if I give you less than I'm able I'm
39:37 not in this conversation going to be
39:39 giving you enough and so uh it's free
39:42 online go get it and and you'll see I
39:45 know it's on LinkedIn is it is it just
39:47 Google uh yeah you can go um Google how
39:51 countries go broke the principles NAA
39:55 get to you yeah yeah yeah
39:59 um what is so amazing to me because I've
40:02 experienced it throughout my life is
40:07 everyone pays attention to how they feel
40:11 at the
40:14 moment and how they feel at the moment
40:19 and they don't see the changes and the
40:23 the changes the cycles and everything
40:26 are so important and and there are
40:28 certain classic things of
40:31 euphoria um and and yet so there two
40:36 classic things of
40:38 euphoria first where we are in the
40:40 economic cycle right there's an economic
40:43 cycle there's always been an economic
40:45 cycle and there always will be an
40:47 economic cycle so to so we are
40:53 about 65 70% through the the E economic
40:58 cycle that we're in judging by measures
41:02 I won't digress into all of them though
41:03 though I can if you want but in other
41:05 words there
41:07 are it will the the cycle will go
41:10 on and in the political
41:13 cycle we are in the classic first hund
41:17 day honeymoon of the new Administration
41:21 which is a time of euphoria and is a
41:25 time that the new beginning
41:27 begins okay so we so we're at a
41:33 unusually good moment that if you see it
41:36 in the psycle the in a cyclical sense
41:40 and you say what is likely okay our
41:44 aspirations are high because we have um
41:50 capitalism business free markets
41:53 combined with technology to produce that
41:56 and the United States is on top of the
42:00 world and we should be very optimistic
42:04 and so on okay but first of all you're
42:07 not looking at the pricing okay so if
42:11 you look at the pricing of Assets in the
42:13 United States relative to other
42:16 countries right now it's expected that
42:19 that will improve relative to the United
42:21 States so there's a hurdle rate you
42:24 always have to keep in mind like it's a
42:25 horse race you have to bet on that you
42:27 have to keep in mind the handicap so and
42:29 and then if you take the
42:32 cycle I I I bet you um that as we take
42:38 one two three four five
42:40 years do you think you're not going to
42:43 have an economic
42:44 downturn do you think you're not going
42:47 to have a bare
42:48 Market do you think that everybody's
42:51 going to be as enthusiastic about how
42:54 things are going with how the government
42:57 is handling it do you think you're not
42:59 going to have any of those other
43:01 problems
43:03 really and it's the I mean the challenge
43:05 of an entrepreneur is you've got to be
43:07 especially a moonshot entrepreneur
43:09 you've got to be super optimistic even
43:12 to get into the
43:13 game uh and but people are not don't see
43:17 the long-term writing on the wall so how
43:19 do you properly capitalize yourself how
43:21 do you protect against the downside how
43:23 do you not over um burden yourself with
43:25 with debt or to Rapid growth um I mean
43:30 this is what I I this is the message I
43:32 want folks to be listening to I'm listen
43:34 I'm the guy who not the Glass isn't half
43:36 full the glass is overflowing I'm Mr
43:38 optimism Mr abundance but uh I as I said
43:43 reading your book it's got me thinking a
43:46 lot so I want to pass on I want to pass
43:48 this well I I I I think
43:52 um I think first of all one of the great
43:54 things about the United States
43:57 and our system is that you can fail and
44:00 you could start again yes it
44:03 differentiates us from most of the world
44:05 that's
44:06 right it's a
44:09 so okay then you think okay whose money
44:12 is it failing and how does that work and
44:14 am I straight and upright and honorable
44:17 with people but you know okay in this
44:19 world of you you know you got to go for
44:21 it you want to go for it and then you'll
44:24 be straight upright and and and and and
44:27 and you and and and and you go for it um
44:30 and you could fail um just don't get
44:35 permanently knocked out of the
44:37 game you you know um there's a there's a
44:41 great there's a there's a great uh talk
44:44 that bill gross not the economic Bill
44:46 gross Bill gross my day lab gives about
44:48 what's the single most important aspect
44:50 for a successful company and it's timing
44:53 it's living long enough to live forever
44:56 if you can
44:57 if you can live through the downturn and
45:00 be there at the upturn um
45:04 then in my case I never raised a dollar
45:08 of debt or a dollar of equity I built
45:12 the largest hedge fund in the world and
45:14 if end did very well but I never and now
45:17 I'm not saying that's the right thing
45:19 but the don't die uh Mantra was my
45:24 Mantra and I always and I did certain
45:27 things like I would always say is my
45:30 profitability X relative to that how
45:32 much do I have in this way and so on so
45:35 I I I I constructed the finances in
45:38 which it couldn't die yeah it could
45:42 contract but it couldn't
45:44 die um so now I'm not sure that that's
45:48 even the smartest way I'm saying that's
45:50 how I did it but I'm not saying it's the
45:52 smartest because it's also sometimes
45:54 it's okay if you die and people will
45:57 understand it and that because of what
45:59 you're like so invest in your character
46:02 okay your
46:04 reputation you can damage you can kill
46:08 your
46:09 reputation but you're you know U if you
46:12 if the company dies and you do it the
46:14 right way that's and your op right that
46:16 that's that's almost allowed in our
46:18 system but be what you know be of like
46:23 be of good character and be of good
46:25 capability it was about 13 years ago I
46:28 had my two kids my two boys and I
46:31 remember at that moment in time I made a
46:33 decision to double down on my health uh
46:36 without question I wanted to see their
46:39 kids their grandkids and really you know
46:41 during this extraordinary time where the
46:44 space Frontier and Ai and crypto is all
46:46 exploding it was like the most exciting
46:48 time ever to be alive and I made a
46:51 decision to double down on my health and
46:54 I've done that in three key areas the
46:57 first is going every year for a fountain
47:00 upload you know Fountain is one of the
47:02 most advanced Diagnostics and
47:03 Therapeutics companies I go there upload
47:06 myself digitize myself about 200 gigabyt
47:09 of data that the AI system is able to
47:12 look at to catch disease at Inception
47:15 you know look for any cardiovascular any
47:17 cancer any neurod degenerative disease
47:19 any metabolic disease these things are
47:22 all going on all the time and you can
47:24 prevent them if you can find them
47:27 Inception so super important so Fountain
47:29 is one of my keys I make that available
47:31 to the CEOs of all my companies my
47:33 family members because you know health
47:35 is in you wealth uh but beyond that uh
47:39 we are a collection of 40 trillion human
47:41 cells and about another 100 trillion
47:44 bacterial cells fungi VAR and we you
47:48 know don't understand how that impacts
47:50 us and so I use a company and a product
47:53 called viome and viome uh has has a
47:57 technology called metatranscriptomic it
47:59 was actually developed uh in New Mexico
48:03 at the same place with the nuclear bomb
48:05 was developed as a biod defense weapon
48:07 and their technology is able to help you
48:11 understand what's going on in your body
48:14 to understand which bacteria are
48:15 producing which proteins and as a
48:17 consequence of that what foods are your
48:20 superfoods that are best for you to eat
48:23 or what food should you avoid right
48:25 what's going on in your oral microbiome
48:28 so I use their testing to understand my
48:32 Foods understand my medicines understand
48:34 my supplements and viome really helps me
48:37 understand from a biological and data
48:40 standpoint what's best for me and then
48:43 finally you know feeling good being
48:45 intelligent moving well is critical but
48:47 looking good when you look yourself in
48:48 the mirror saying you know I feel great
48:51 about life is so important right and so
48:54 a product I use every day twice a day is
48:58 called one skin developed by four
49:00 incredible PhD women that found this 10
49:03 amino acid peptide it's able to zap
49:06 scile cells in your skin and really help
49:09 you stay youthful in your look and
49:12 appearance so for me these are three
49:15 Technologies I love and I use all the
49:17 time uh I'll have my team link to those
49:21 in the show notes down below please
49:22 check them out anyway I hope you enjoyed
49:25 that now back to the episode
49:27 let's get into the into the big dead
49:29 cycle and the five stages and give us
49:33 understanding of where we are in that
49:35 process if you
49:37 would um okay so there are these cycles
49:42 that are you know
49:44 the short-term debt cycle or the
49:46 business cycle that um years we know
49:50 what those look like and then they rise
49:54 debt keeps Rising relative to
49:58 income
50:00 okay um and the income is needed to
50:03 service the
50:06 Deb okay so the way I the way I view it
50:09 is um after the war debts are basically
50:14 written off you've got you know that you
50:17 you start with my parents didn't have
50:20 yeah they didn't have any debt they
50:22 didn't have any much um and and and then
50:25 they begin the and it's almost what we
50:28 talked about earlier they don't want to
50:30 spend money you know they don't want to
50:32 get and and in the early stage of the
50:34 mar the cycle it's the sound money stage
50:38 and the sound money stage can be um
50:41 measured
50:43 by
50:44 um
50:46 first does the debt create more
50:50 income then it's needed to pay it
50:53 back I mean that's that's basic it's
50:56 it's a good use of capital right it
51:00 makes everybody happy yes I got I lent
51:03 you the money I got pidb with my
51:05 interest rates I'm happy you got
51:07 borrowed the money you Ed the money in a
51:09 way that allowed you to move forward you
51:12 came up with the good ideas and so on
51:14 productivity increases and debt is not
51:17 Rising fast relative to income
51:20 confidence is high Financial systems are
51:22 stable yep the confidence being high
51:25 starts to be a red flag
51:27 ah okay you see so what happens is um
51:32 you're at that stage and by the way the
51:35 monetary systems at that stage are hard
51:39 in other words at the world at when we
51:40 came out of World War II this is the
51:43 beginning of the new debt cycle the new
51:45 cycle um gold was there you couldn't
51:49 lend more than gold because they had it
51:52 back and and so on so you had sound
51:55 money and sound
51:59 finances okay and then time goes
52:03 on and by the way I want to speak about
52:07 Bitcoin at some point as a as an
52:10 alternative to Gold but not right now
52:13 great um and
52:17 um and confidence
52:21 builds and everybody those who are doing
52:25 it are make making
52:27 money the prices go from cheap to
52:31 expensive like I told you
52:33 the uh earnings yield on stocks were
52:37 twice the bond yield I mean like wow you
52:41 could just take the dividends you know
52:43 but everybody was worried about going
52:45 down and then it changes the prices go
52:48 up the
52:50 optimism and you know they say uh Peter
52:53 what you're not in the market I mean
52:55 come on what's wrong with you man you
52:57 start your house and put it in the
52:59 marketplace yeah yeah okay and and you
53:02 go in there and then you come um really
53:06 to um getting invested asset prices uh
53:11 become expensive you borrow money to do
53:14 it and so you have um a debt
53:19 bubble in other words you get to the
53:23 point where the income produced doesn't
53:27 service the debt and then you begin a
53:30 dynamic of very simple uh is that where
53:33 we are
53:34 today um we're as I say it looks to me
53:38 like we're in
53:39 1998 you know these all become how
53:44 extreme okay and so I have measures I
53:46 have indicators like that give it and it
53:49 looks like
53:50 98 okay which means we still have a year
53:53 and a half of Good Times ahead I don't
53:55 it's not so
53:57 prise it's a thing that goes like this
53:59 and you know I know that we're over here
54:02 and then what happens
54:05 is that goes on and you see
54:09 unsustainable uh debt growth now the
54:11 unsustainable debt growth that we're
54:12 seeing right now is particularly the
54:15 government the government is going to be
54:18 in financial trouble and I'll get into
54:21 that in a minute yeah um but um what
54:24 happens is you see that debt growth and
54:28 then you see a rise in interest rates is
54:32 the
54:33 classic and a tightening of monetary
54:36 policy be put some breaks on and that
54:40 pops the
54:44 bubble and then you go through the um
54:48 debt liquidation
54:51 phase and Ray can I just ask a question
54:54 here which is these Cycles have been
54:56 over and over and over again there are
54:59 there are historians and printed books
55:01 and so forth is is it the
55:04 politicians are just
55:06 unable to
55:09 um uh to make hard decisions in order to
55:14 keep in political power is this just
55:15 yeah FAL in human nature that we can't
55:19 both both of both of those things you're
55:22 asking why in these Cycles
55:27 um you you
55:30 know if you look at let's say debt to
55:35 income it goes like this and why we keep
55:39 going wh why does this thing
55:42 exist um and and why don't we sort of
55:46 keep it a debt income more the same and
55:51 um and there were um the reasons uh
55:55 politics and human nature you you
55:57 touched on um that that uh first of all
56:03 um
56:06 credit
56:07 creates buying and
56:11 stimulation and everybody everybody
56:14 wants up but but that's that's
56:18 historically because the credit employed
56:21 people that then consume when you
56:24 spend if you I mean the Govern govern
56:26 when they say I'm now going to give you
56:28 money they're going to give you money
56:30 and credit it's mostly credit and they
56:33 make credit available and then you you
56:36 you go take credit that's how when they
56:38 lower interest rates and they make
56:40 credit more available um you go that's
56:43 you get your car you get your house on
56:47 credit yeah okay but credit creates debt
56:52 yeah and debt yeah okay so what happens
56:58 is every time you get one of
57:03 these then a local D they want to give
57:06 you credit but it's like giving an uh
57:09 you know an alcoholic a shot or to get
57:11 him out of the you know or or an addict
57:15 okay you give them a
57:17 dose um and okay and you and you get
57:21 that and politicians like credit because
57:26 what credit comes before debt
57:29 payments so I give you credit we get in
57:33 debt you love
57:37 me you know that's why they want the
57:39 Federal Reserve and the central
57:41 government to be separate you know to
57:43 try to do that but still what happens is
57:46 and that human nature wants the credit
57:50 you know so it
57:53 so so that's why debt to incomes go like
57:58 that you know and
58:01 so you
58:03 know show you in this in this this
58:15 book you know this is the government and
58:19 this is the the cycle and that and then
58:22 this is The Debt Service payments that
58:24 we're going to have going forward
58:29 so yeah human nature we all want up
58:33 we're all betting on up okay all the
58:36 time
58:38 up betting on up
58:41 unless to buy things that'll go up
58:46 yes um
58:49 so the the party ends the bubble
58:54 pops yeah uh that's right
58:58 um You have the debt problem and then
59:01 what historically what they would do is
59:04 then they would give more credit so uh
59:07 um except when you hit it zero interest
59:10 rate you had a
59:11 problem and I mean I found that
59:14 incredible to get into negative interest
59:16 rates even right why do I think that's
59:19 incredible no I said right right yeah
59:22 okay yeah um seems I was with
59:26 Central Bankers you know
59:29 I'm I'm in that group sort of and uh
59:33 when they had uh zero interest rate
59:35 negative interest rates and they were
59:39 calculating uh they said how negative
59:42 can we make interest
59:43 rates and they
59:47 calculated um they estimated for a very
59:50 short period of time uh it could be up
59:52 to 400 basis points and the way that
59:54 they calculated that
59:56 is by how much paper money that you
59:58 could store in storage because your
60:02 Arbitrage if you had the paper money you
60:05 wouldn't have to have a negative rate
60:08 you know
60:09 that why not hold the paper rather than
60:12 to hold something that has negative rate
60:15 and so how much negative rate could you
60:19 have and that what and that was the
60:22 essentially the Arbitrage well anyway
60:24 when that happen and it happened in
60:27 history by the way it happened 1933 same
60:29 thing wow and what they do is then what
60:34 they do is they print money and they buy
60:37 the
60:38 bonds so like in in 2008 uh excuse me uh
60:43 they did that in two th starting in 2008
60:46 and then 2020 when there was
60:49 covid they had to send out
60:53 checks so the government had to send out
60:55 checks
60:56 checks the government doesn't get to
60:58 print money where do they get the money
61:01 to send out the checks they borrowed so
61:03 they send out the checks and the Central
61:06 Bank lends them the money and prints the
61:09 money and lends them the money so
61:11 everybody gets all this
61:13 money and there's like a surprise that
61:16 there's
61:18 inflation everybody gets all these
61:19 checks and all this money and there's a
61:22 surprise that there's inflation I mean
61:25 there were other things going going on
61:26 too but disruption and supplies and
61:29 things like that but mostly it was the
61:31 amount of money going in so there are
61:33 two things that happen at that
61:35 deleveraging
61:40 point those so I I want to make that
61:44 clear that here are the here are the
61:46 things that cause the
61:49 deleveraging
61:50 [Music]
61:54 um Supply demand
61:56 and and Debt
61:59 Service okay so let's take the
62:02 government Supply
62:04 demand the government is going to have
62:07 to sell a lot of
62:09 bonds to owners because there's so much
62:13 debt around one man's debt and another
62:15 man's
62:16 assets so because they are all the world
62:19 is holding all these debt assets that
62:22 actually for various reasons they don't
62:24 want to add to it a big way because it's
62:27 already such a high percentage of their
62:28 portfolio and there are geopolitical
62:31 issues going on okay um that the am the
62:35 huge amount that will be
62:37 sold will likely
62:40 over be substantially greater than the
62:43 demand for it and so people start
62:45 selling their debt and when they start
62:48 seeing that it's going to be bad because
62:50 they know it could be one of two things
62:51 either you have a problem paying and
62:53 interest rates go up and and you have
62:56 that dynamic or the Central Bank comes
62:59 in and buys the debt which prints the
63:03 money and devalues the value of money
63:07 okay either way when there's too much
63:10 debt and a supply and demand imbalance
63:12 you don't want to own debt which is
63:15 where I think we are unless there is a
63:19 change it's what I call my 3% solution
63:22 but we won't get into that now I assume
63:25 uh um but you know there is a path here
63:28 to deal with this uh but um if they
63:31 don't deal with it you're going to have
63:33 a supply demand problem I believe and
63:35 then in addition to that what happens in
63:38 debt service when Debt Service
63:41 fill uh the way I think about it is um
63:45 the credit system is like the
63:47 circulatory system in our body and the
63:51 blood uh which is the credit brings
63:53 nutrients all through the system
63:56 but what happens is that when it
63:59 accumulates debt it's like accumulating
64:02 plaque in the system because you have
64:04 more and more Debt
64:07 Service that
64:10 constricts um the um that amount that
64:15 can pass through the system like the
64:17 government Debt Service payments are
64:20 grow and then you hit a part of it which
64:25 in in
64:26 markets uh is called and this this is
64:30 usually for uh private creditors is
64:33 called it a death spiral a debt death
64:35 spiral and the debt death spiral what
64:39 happens is as Debt Service payments
64:42 rise so that you have to borrow money to
64:46 pay the debt and then the Creditor sees
64:51 that so they pull back and the credit
64:54 spread Rises and as the credit spread
64:57 Rises you have to borrow more money that
65:00 is the death spiral and that's when you
65:05 see that
65:07 Dynamic um
65:09 that's and that's close to where we are
65:12 in the government debt but for a company
65:15 that will drive a bankruptcy in the
65:16 United States that drives what it D it
65:20 it it it drives the um Central Bank
65:26 to come in and buy the
65:29 debt and depreciate the value of money
65:34 that's what a monetary inflation is yeah
65:37 you know a a lot of
65:40 people think I when I started I think
65:43 why do you have an inflationary
65:47 depression in other words how can you
65:49 have when demand is depressed how do you
65:52 do it you have uh money money production
65:55 and then I say well why don't they just
65:57 stop producing the money well because if
66:00 they stop producing the money the debt
66:02 they'll have a deflationary debt problem
66:05 that's the dynamic that's the mechanic
66:08 and I want that's why I want to explain
66:10 these mechanics in this book yeah you
66:12 know so people could see it because I
66:14 show it in the book and everybody thinks
66:17 uh you know I'm a genius my house prices
66:19 are going value of my house is going up
66:21 the value of my stock portfolio is going
66:23 up but it's all in massively inflated
66:26 dollars I I I know like it's so
66:29 funny because people think they get
66:33 richer if the price of their houses and
66:36 the price of things that they're owning
66:39 in a sense go up but it's a same
66:42 house it's the same stuff right it when
66:47 when it goes up in price because of
66:49 inflation I mean buying power is what
66:52 matters not price a dollar what can a
66:55 dollar value today um which is why I
66:58 still like the meme you know one Bitcoin
66:59 equal one Bitcoin uh unfortunately one1
67:02 does not equal $1 uh any yeah uh so
67:08 we're in this this these five stages uh
67:12 of the Dead cycle and just to to wrap
67:15 this up we're in the deleveraging
67:18 stage and well the government you mean
67:21 now well no no I'm saying in in your
67:23 five in your five stages in your and
67:25 then that the leveraging stage uh
67:28 typically if the debt is denominated in
67:31 the currency that the central bank can
67:34 print you always get the printing yes
67:38 and you always get the devaluation of
67:40 money and then what happens is then the
67:43 debt becomes so
67:46 cheap that it's easy to pay it off so if
67:50 you're watching like like Japan is a
67:52 good example if you owned a Japanese
67:54 Bond you would have lost about 80% of
67:57 your money relative to something stable
68:00 like let's say gold and you would have
68:02 lost about 60% of your money relative to
68:05 a US Bond because you got 3% less
68:08 interest rates and the currency
68:10 depreciated by almost 4% a year and that
68:13 7% a year is what you would lose and
68:16 then what happens is if you're in
68:18 Argentina take it to the extreme you
68:21 take that debt and you pay it
68:23 off because it's worthless with
68:26 barrels of pesos or whatever it might be
68:30 yeah where where are we in term I mean
68:33 let me ask the question I started with
68:35 which is uh we're in this Administration
68:39 Elon jumps in the department of
68:41 government efficiency is created the
68:43 goal is cut back uh government waste uh
68:47 try and get us more towards a a uh a
68:51 balanced budget I mean clearly had we
68:56 uh not done anything there is no hope
68:58 we're we're heading towards disaster is
69:01 there any do you think that Doge can
69:03 make an impact on this um I honestly um
69:10 I honestly don't know the consequences
69:14 the
69:16 realities of of
69:19 that I I I I'm I'm I I can't answer your
69:24 question it's it's too complicated for
69:27 me I'm not at the nitty-gritty of being
69:30 able to say if you shut this thing off
69:34 what are the
69:36 repercussions of that and how that works
69:40 I would need to have a much more I need
69:44 to have not only a much more
69:47 detailed um but I would also need to be
69:50 able to
69:51 anticipate um you know there's an action
69:54 or reaction and what the reaction is um
69:58 it's something like the tariffs you know
70:02 um if it's very difficult for me to
70:05 answer your question okay I appreciate
70:07 that but you are clear if we're doing
70:09 nothing um there's a there's a
70:13 definitive wall we're racing towards yes
70:15 I'm this goes back to my 3% solution
70:18 okay let covered it's covered in
70:23 there under the
70:26 existing
70:27 budget if there's not a rolling forward
70:31 of if there is a rolling forward of the
70:33 Trump tax cuts from
70:35 before the size of the uh deficit will
70:40 be about 7 and a half% of
70:43 GDP you're going to
70:45 need about 3% of
70:49 GDP to stabilize
70:52 it
70:53 um uh so I call this my
70:57 3% three-part solution okay so first get
71:01 3% in your
71:03 mind okay can we get the deficit down to
71:07 3% of
71:09 GDP and there are three
71:12 things that can do that we we know the
71:15 first two uh is spending
71:19 taxes and by the way when I mean taxes I
71:22 mean tax revenue which isn't the same as
71:24 tax rates
71:26 mhm uh spending taxes and interest
71:31 rates because the interest rate on the
71:36 debt is such a big
71:39 factor now I've gone through the
71:42 calculations and have and have studied
71:44 this and and in that study you can you
71:48 can read it and you and whatever
71:52 if um if one way or another I don't care
71:55 how how you do it that the the how you
71:57 do it is almost an ideological question
72:01 the fact that you need to do it is
72:03 important so it's like you know the
72:06 patient that has too much plaque and
72:09 they're eating and they're not
72:10 exercising I don't care whether you eat
72:13 greens or you exercise or I don't know
72:16 but you got to get that plaque you've
72:19 got to get that um going the other way
72:22 and um and so that's the 3%
72:25 and you could do it from some mix now in
72:28 my studying
72:30 these um if you do it with the Right Mix
72:33 so that it's not too much of
72:36 anything it's not
72:40 traumatic um and if you do that you will
72:44 get a fall in race
72:46 naturally okay because the market will
72:51 be better off less
72:53 risk and um if there was any weakness
72:56 due to the fiscal stimulate uh fiscal
72:59 restraint the central bank will Le's
73:01 monetary policy and that's always been
73:03 the case I show I don't know how many
73:05 cases like 20 cases there of around the
73:08 world this happened in from 1991 to 1998
73:13 in the United States so there's a way
73:18 the real issue like I don't really care
73:21 they I think all the policy makers
73:23 should make this 3%
73:25 ledge because you're going to whoever it
73:27 is I they're going to argue over the way
73:31 yeah and they won't do it that's my
73:34 worry
73:37 okay um there's a there's a few
73:43 uh uh highflying Solutions out there and
73:46 I want to throw one towards you uh Rey
73:48 you know my passion about longevity and
73:51 extended Health span uh uh Dario who's
73:56 the CEO of anthropic I don't know if you
73:58 know Dario um no was at Davos and saying
74:04 something that's been discussed and
74:06 asserted by a number of other
74:08 individuals that in the next 5 to 10
74:11 years we will see fundamental
74:13 breakthroughs in human health span and
74:17 Longevity uh that we may see his words
74:20 not mine a doubling of the human
74:23 lifespan uh you know we have
74:25 $101 million Health span X prize going
74:29 on right now to add 20 healthy years and
74:33 so one of the factors I find fascinating
74:36 is the notion of if people are vibrant
74:40 have uh the cognition and the uh the
74:44 fortitude the Vitality to keep
74:46 functioning so that at you know 80 or 90
74:51 you've got the wherewithal you had in
74:53 your 50s or 60s
74:56 uh I have to imagine that would have a
74:59 fundamental uh impact on the economics
75:02 here
75:03 um I'm not
75:06 uh here's my confusion I'm not I don't
75:09 have the answer um a number of those uh
75:14 studies I've seen studies that said that
75:18 extending life span is going to raise
75:20 the
75:22 cost um the cost of heal
75:27 Health huh okay you would know this
75:30 better than I so I'm not um um but um
75:35 and and then there becomes the
75:37 retirement age question which is very
75:40 much a political question so the
75:43 question is are you productive or are
75:47 you an a consumer of productivity yeah
75:52 okay I would say that if you're watching
75:55 around the world extending working
76:00 years
76:02 you um you don't see it I mean you see
76:06 um the fight against it almost political
76:09 it's a
76:10 political
76:12 nonstarter s of fight so you have to ask
76:15 yourself does the um working years get
76:19 extended let's say and then
76:22 um ma ma the the what I had read was you
76:28 have more years that you have to take
76:30 care of that person and so on so it's
76:34 not like you go to become young again
76:38 well now I I'm not arguing that that's
76:40 the case yeah I'm saying I don't know
76:43 the answer today in the US the life
76:46 average lifespan is around 79 the
76:48 average Health span is around
76:50 63 meaning you're you're spending the
76:53 last you know 16 17 years of your life
76:55 in some level of of pain and decrepitude
77:00 and I think the goal is can we actually
77:02 change that so that you're healthy uh
77:05 initially and then extend the two two
77:08 you've got it engineered
77:12 beautifully but I suspect you know
77:18 longevity because you were just talking
77:20 about longevity not Health in those
77:24 years you know
77:25 I mean like the one thing we got this
77:27 baby boom and and these people these old
77:30 people of my generation and um and you
77:33 got a lot of them living and then when
77:37 they die they're not a
77:41 burden okay so dying from Actuarial
77:45 tables or financial tables can be good
77:49 remember Logan's Run the movie oh yeah
77:51 yeah you were you were supposed to be
77:53 you know knock yourself off at age 35
77:55 and turn yourself into a food supply
77:58 anyway that's a different story um all
78:00 right let's I I believe that if a person
78:05 uh is got the energy and uh the drive
78:10 and is not in pain uh and is not
78:13 restricted by regulation that at the
78:15 peak of your capability you're going to
78:18 want to keep in the game and that's the
78:20 hope that's at least the work well I I
78:23 would say um if you actually look at
78:26 what happens in
78:27 countries your hope is not consistent
78:30 with the reties in other words when
78:33 people come to their working their
78:35 retirement age they will fight and and
78:38 for that retirement
78:42 age we're going to find out soon enough
78:44 what I keep on telling people is you
78:46 know we're alive during the 99th level
78:48 of gameplay and a lot of these questions
78:50 are I want to be alive I'm with you keep
78:52 me alive keep me alive
78:55 favor I you know even if I get to
78:58 decrepit in my years that I wouldn't
79:00 have been in live yeah Tony Tony Robbins
79:03 who's a mutual dear friend and I both
79:05 invite you to come and and join us at
79:07 Fountain life and uh let us well you
79:09 know I will thank you I appreciate that
79:11 let's talk to bitcoin let's talk about
79:13 Bitcoin a second um I know you're a
79:15 Bitcoin holder but you're still more
79:18 excited about gold uh if I remember
79:21 correctly how do you think about Bitcoin
79:24 uh you know Mike sailor uh was my
79:27 roommate fraternity brother at MIT um
79:30 and he's probably one of the most
79:32 outspoken individuals if if you I'm sure
79:35 you've heard Michael speak about Bitcoin
79:37 are you sold by his his vision let me
79:40 tell you
79:42 um what I think about it
79:45 um because I could I'll speak for myself
79:48 and um I think these things are
79:51 accurate um first thing is
79:54 [Music]
79:57 we agree on
79:58 anti-money we agree on anti-
80:02 debt okay that's
80:04 important when you say anti-money Define
80:07 anti-money
80:10 please that there are two purp purposes
80:13 of
80:14 money um and that is as a storeold of
80:18 wealth and a medium of exchange medium
80:21 of exchange it'll exist store holder
80:23 wealth you store it in a
80:26 bond okay you're yeah money and debt are
80:30 the same thing because when you're
80:33 holding money you're holding it in a
80:35 debt
80:39 instrument you anything you're going to
80:42 put your money your dollars you're going
80:44 to be in debt instrument otherwise you
80:46 know you lose 5% a year or something
80:49 that you know um and so money and and
80:52 debt are the same because debt is a a
80:54 promise to get the money so they're the
80:57 same we have a supply demand problem
80:59 with this money in debt okay so I don't
81:03 want to own money and debt and so we're
81:08 aligned anybody who's going to want to
81:10 say it as a stor hold of wealth is
81:14 because the quantity of it cannot be
81:17 increased other than through the mining
81:19 activity BL you know but with that
81:22 restrictions okay and that's that that
81:24 so the first thing I want to emphasize
81:26 is are you there is that part of you or
81:29 there and then how much should be in
81:31 your portfolio of that thing or those
81:35 things so I'm a kind of those things guy
81:39 that prefers gold for the reasons I'm
81:42 going to explain okay but I but I have
81:44 some Bitcoin but I've got uh much more
81:47 gold and um and uh and the amount that I
81:52 uh I I think is a prudent amount
81:55 if you look at correlations and the
81:57 systems and all sorts of things the the
82:01 least risk amount to have in terms of
82:03 maintaining your buying power is
82:05 somewhere between 10 and 15% of a
82:08 portfolio so I think they should be%
82:10 should be Bitcoin or
82:13 gold anti-money anti-money and you're
82:16 putting the two together in that bucket
82:18 okay yeah yeah now on the Bitcoin versus
82:23 gold um here's the thing
82:26 um
82:28 Bitcoin is not a private asset any uh
82:31 the government's watch it they know what
82:33 you're going to have they know where you
82:36 are they can tax it they can take money
82:39 away from it it exists uh uh at their
82:43 pleasure and they can do anything they
82:46 want with you their comfort of you being
82:48 in Bitcoin is better than their comfort
82:51 of you being in Gold let's say uh well I
82:54 I agree the fact that it's that it can
82:56 be monitored the movement of it can be
82:58 monitored uh as but it doesn't exist at
83:02 their pleasure uh are you saying that
83:05 the government could shut they could if
83:07 they wanted to uh under regulation and
83:09 so on tax you yes as a matter of fact
83:12 like I was saying I was with the central
83:14 Bankers who said um the the reason that
83:17 we um when negative interest rates how
83:20 much could it if they had a digital
83:23 currency
83:25 there was no floor on the negative
83:27 interest rates because they could tax
83:29 you okay so okay they you don't have the
83:35 Privacy you can get taxed and and so on
83:38 um um whereas the saying of gold is you
83:42 know it's it it's the only asset that
83:44 you can have that's not somebody else's
83:46 liability meaning you have it in your
83:49 possession and um and that's that's
83:52 somewhat different the second thing is
83:55 um central banks holding it as reserves
83:58 I'm watch watching the
84:01 um periods of conflict and so on
84:06 um they go to Gold even in terms of
84:10 their enemies because like um what
84:14 governments do in periods of conflict or
84:16 whatever is they print money they make
84:19 bonds and that's not good and they don't
84:22 want to hold each other's bonds nobody
84:23 wants to hold the bond
84:25 and um and that's why they hold gold
84:29 they don't trust each other and um um
84:33 that wouldn't work that way for Bitcoin
84:36 because governments
84:38 can uh control it we we do we do inflate
84:43 gold every year what percentage is mind
84:45 every every year
84:49 infant a pittance okay um I don't know
84:52 like 1% or so of the stock of gold yes
84:58 [Music]
84:59 um uh and consumption for jewelry and
85:03 that's um anyway the
85:06 um
85:07 and it has been for thousands of years
85:11 in all different
85:14 places
85:16 so and another thing
85:19 is I can understand price changes in
85:23 Gold mhm
85:26 in other words if prices change I can if
85:29 this changes and that changes I can make
85:31 sense why the gold price change that way
85:33 I have a problem doing that with
85:36 Bitcoin it it it still very much moves
85:40 in a way that it wouldn't be necessary
85:42 it's a supply demand speculative Market
85:45 that's tougher for me to nail down yeah
85:47 I I I am curious um by the way I just
85:50 asked uh anthropic here and it's uh we
85:53 inflate gold about 1 .5 to 2% per year
85:56 um yeah that makes sense the uh uh you
86:00 know I am still i' I would expect uh
86:04 Bitcoin to go up when there is uh
86:07 International Strife or instability or
86:10 uh you know difficulty predicting what's
86:13 coming next but uh we're seeing swings
86:16 that are not related to anything that's
86:19 really explainable today that's that's
86:22 right so when I go down that list of
86:25 things I
86:27 say I favor gold for that reason those
86:30 reasons could you imagine changing your
86:33 mind if some sure if some thing came
86:37 along that tell me
86:39 why I I also um some people have said
86:43 and I'm not sure if this is right it's
86:46 been quite amazing but that with Quantum
86:49 Computing and so on there's a good
86:51 chance that you can break it
86:54 yeah I don't know if that's true I'm not
86:57 an expert I'm I'm just throwing another
86:59 thing in there where I'll give you
87:01 another answer to that R just so you
87:03 have it in your uh in your quiver if if
87:06 quantum Computing were to allow us to uh
87:10 to break encryption on bitcoin we have a
87:13 lot bigger problems that same uh that
87:16 same Quantum decryption would give us
87:18 the nuclear codes would allow anybody to
87:20 enter your bank accounts allow us to
87:25 we we you know we need to go to the some
87:29 Island Paradise you know
87:33 like it was so funny I uh I was in um I
87:40 was in Bali in this paradise and um um
87:45 then I fly up to
87:47 China and um you know um in in val there
87:52 was uh
87:54 this spot Off the Grid you know find and
87:58 they have this food plot I'm like I
88:01 didn't even know how much land produces
88:04 how much
88:06 food and I didn't realize that you can
88:09 have a plot of of land that's not very
88:12 big and you could live you know
88:14 wonderfully and everybody's in peace and
88:16 they're going to their meditation and
88:18 they're doing this and they'll enjoying
88:19 life and I get up and I go fly to
88:23 Beijing and I go and um with leaders in
88:26 Beijing and then I go to U there and
88:29 they're fighting for control of the
88:33 world you know
88:36 and you know you're on the
88:39 first okay yeah the grd and they're
88:42 going to get me and I you know they'll
88:45 get they'll take my phone and they'll
88:48 do you know I'm almost you know I mean
88:52 we do have to you know reflect on some
88:54 of these things let Let's uh two final
88:57 subjects uh if you've got the uh I know
89:00 it's getting late there but I want to
89:01 talk about China and I want to talk
89:02 about what your 2025 predictions might
89:05 look like so uh there's a lot of
89:08 conversation right now about China
89:11 versus us we've got a new Administration
89:13 coming in um you
89:16 know I'm my concern of course is we've
89:20 seen recently with deep seek we've seen
89:22 with nuclear fusion you know while while
89:25 the US is vibrant in terms of an
89:27 entrepreneurial and Technology ecosystem
89:30 and engine um China should never be
89:34 misjudged as someone who is uh is
89:37 pushing across the
89:38 board uh how do you think about China
89:42 how should we how should an entrepreneur
89:43 think about China we are at war with
89:45 China and it is a um it it hasn't turned
89:51 to a military war but it's actually
89:55 turned to very much a subversive war in
89:59 which each with you know with overthrow
90:03 the government and do all sorts of stuff
90:07 um and it's not going to go back it's
90:11 going to be that way the two countries
90:14 fight Wars
90:16 differently
90:17 um a leader in in China one of the top
90:21 leaders in China was describing
90:24 um the Chinese way of fighting War and
90:27 the Western Way which he calls the
90:29 Mediterranean way of fighting War um the
90:33 Mediterranean way is that you go in and
90:37 you fight and you fight to win and you
90:39 kill each other and you do that um the
90:42 Chinese way of fighting is so that your
90:45 opponent doesn't even know you're
90:47 they're fighting you wi if you're not
90:48 smart enough to win the war without
90:51 actually fighting you not stop be very
90:54 smart so it's a war of deception it's a
90:58 war of um anyway so there are these
91:02 different um Wars going on the different
91:06 mentalities um and um and and so that's
91:10 where we are I think um and then there's
91:14 this uh desire to have these separate
91:17 parallel universes in technology I don't
91:20 believe that you're um you're going to
91:23 be able to Main maintain control of
91:25 intellectual property that is something
91:28 that is publicly used I mean maybe if
91:31 you go inside your your spot and you
91:35 have sandboxing and whatever it is and
91:38 and you never bring it out and you never
91:40 look at it then maybe you can
91:43 intellectually protect it and that's
91:46 sort of how the atomic bomb was built
91:48 you know and maybe you can do some of
91:50 that um and by the way both countries
91:53 are trying to secretively build the
91:55 weapon that the other one can't um fight
91:59 against because if they show the the way
92:02 you really win is you build the weapon
92:05 that the other one can't fight against
92:07 secretively you show it to them they
92:09 find out that they can't win and then
92:11 you win without uh
92:13 fighting um that's the that's the best
92:16 way and um so but um we um we've changed
92:22 the world order
92:25 um and it's been very clear by uh Donald
92:28 Trump um that we have gone from a
92:33 multinational
92:35 multilateral environment to a um
92:41 unilateral each country for for their
92:45 own uh might is right kind of
92:48 environment and so we are in that
92:50 unilateral might is right if if I can
92:54 exert pressure on you to get what I want
92:56 to you know that's that's the way it is
92:59 which is historically what most of
93:00 History's been like and so um and we
93:04 have actually done that because we've
93:06 had a few
93:07 Wars we had
93:10 um the
93:13 um the Ukraine Russia War which I
93:18 think will come to some kind of a
93:21 ceasefire which will be temporary
93:24 probably you've had um the
93:30 Israeli um Iran and proxies Iran's
93:36 proxies war that uh Israel
93:40 won okay and you've had a conflict
93:45 between the United States and
93:47 China that um the United States did much
93:52 better and did much worse than they
93:57 would have
93:59 expected um that and particularly let's
94:02 say the Chinese and the Chinese have
94:05 domestic issues we have domestic issues
94:08 we will have our domestic issues but
94:10 they have domestic issues and I think
94:12 it's like you've you know you've got you
94:15 you've banged things around and you're
94:17 sort of surprised that the Chinese
94:20 probably are a bit and nobody wants to
94:22 go to worse War
94:25 so I think that probably over the near
94:28 term you're going to have this behind
94:32 the scenes
94:33 subversive kind of War you're going to
94:37 but in terms of economics and
94:39 Technologies look the winner of the
94:41 techn you cannot lose the war yeah in
94:44 the in the technology war and and by the
94:48 way that's also something that's
94:50 economically like I I think in terms of
94:53 let's say the super
94:55 scalers and you must win the techn not
94:57 only countries must win the technology
94:59 War those companies must win the and
95:02 profit may not be the number one thing
95:05 and you I think the opportunities are in
95:08 the
95:09 applications and the usage of it by the
95:12 way and China is doing a lot better than
95:14 that in terms of actual applications
95:18 we're we're doing we're we're Advanced
95:20 on the
95:21 chips and you know by how much but in
95:24 terms of actual usage of it and and
95:27 betting a Chinese so we have this
95:30 Dynamic going on and and China has its
95:33 own set of issues so I think that
95:37 probably over the near
95:39 term um you'll have a lot of pushing the
95:44 pushing the edge and that kind of stuff
95:48 but probably not going over the
95:51 edge um and so but that's not a
95:54 permanent set of circumstances but that
95:57 would be my take yeah you said a few
96:00 things I think are are really important
96:02 to hit on here uh number one um you know
96:06 any kind of restrictions we put on China
96:08 for AI like chips from Nvidia and so
96:11 forth all that does is force them to
96:15 basically uh start building capabilities
96:18 internally um and you know with huawe
96:20 chips right now the second thing and
96:22 forces them do is to become a lot more
96:26 efficient so deep seek was an example of
96:30 okay we don't have the the chip
96:32 resources so how do we change the
96:34 algorithms and just do it a lot more
96:35 efficiently so intell you know bringing
96:38 a new you you sort of darwinian
96:41 evolution have a constraint Evolution
96:44 will find a way find a way around it so
96:47 I think we've been seeing we see that um
96:50 also I'm a bit concerned I'm curious
96:53 what your thought are you know you
96:54 mentioned that 60% of the US doesn't
96:56 read above the sixth grade level uh
97:00 which is kind of shocking um we do have
97:03 a leveling of the education playing
97:05 field happening very soon when this
97:08 device becomes a polymath in your pocket
97:12 right where in a conversation with your
97:16 with your AI agent
97:18 you're able to deduce or learn or create
97:22 or serve anything that you need both in
97:25 China and the US I mean so we've got an
97:28 augmented
97:31 population you don't think
97:33 so well I I just go back to my
97:35 experience I I happen to have a son um
97:40 whose passion is edtech okay and he's
97:45 gone into the third world and gone to
97:47 the poorest areas um to make this
97:50 connected to make it like computers
97:53 and all of that and the the the original
97:57 theory was and the expectation was why
98:00 shouldn't they not only get educated by
98:03 this um and he can he founded he made a
98:06 device so that it's it connects to TVs
98:08 and makes computers and all of that and
98:11 why shouldn't they do that and then if
98:13 they do not only do you educate those um
98:17 but you have them have different kinds
98:19 of jobs that they can do remote remotely
98:23 and so on and so when I look at the
98:27 wealth gaps or the M these gaps and so
98:30 on um I was surprised that that didn't
98:36 happen so I'm hesitant to LEAP to the
98:41 notion you know a lot has to do with
98:44 parenting a lot has to do with you know
98:48 who who's giving the guidance you know
98:51 what is it like you know uh um so and
98:55 and we have an issue of parenting even
98:58 we have an issue uh you know okay why
99:01 does the 60% of the population have less
99:03 than a sixth grade education that
99:06 they're there's almost a leap that those
99:09 people are going to take this and
99:11 they're going to be productive and so on
99:13 so forth well I was surprised that it
99:16 didn't happen and I can kind of see
99:17 maybe why it might not happen is at
99:20 least my I'm I'm not assuming it
99:22 necessarily will
99:24 fair
99:25 enough um 2025 year ahead what are you
99:30 what are you seeing what are your
99:31 predictions for the what's the best
99:33 we're going to see in this year right um
99:36 obviously 2025 is a year of
99:40 great great great uncertainty I I think
99:43 that uh I I I think honestly the first
99:46 big issue that we're going to deal with
99:49 is the budget issue right now it's not
99:51 the issue and everybody thinks of it not
99:54 as the issue um in the first half of the
99:57 year um it's going to be the issue and
100:00 how they deal with that is very
100:01 important to me um in terms of the
100:04 supply demand because let's remember
100:08 that the treasury market is the basis of
100:12 all markets okay it's the foundation of
100:15 all markets and if
100:18 you create a reverberation for Supply
100:22 demand then it changes all that Capital
100:25 raising and that's funding this thing or
100:27 that I mean the world gets disrupted
100:31 okay so it's very important so um that's
100:34 the first thing that I'm sort of then
100:37 we're going to actually
100:39 see um um I the first 100 days of a new
100:45 Administration is a time of great
100:47 optimism and also is a time when you
100:49 have what priorities have got to be
100:53 it's got a you know it's real world time
100:56 now okay it's game time so the theories
101:00 are going to be put to the test and the
101:03 consequences you know
101:05 does you know does the cost cutting
101:08 happen does the is that realistic you
101:11 know how many numbers can you do that um
101:15 and not only because of you know its
101:18 secondary
101:19 consequences um but and then there has
101:22 to be prior PR ization I think the
101:25 prioritization is also going to be um
101:29 smartly on energy for data
101:33 centers um and the building of AI and so
101:37 on to win because the techn whoever wins
101:41 the tech war is going to win the
101:42 military war you know with with China
101:45 and so on and so but how that game goes
101:49 it's going to be a tough
101:51 game um so when I look at that I think
101:56 um we're not going to be as happy a year
102:00 from now as we think we're going to
102:03 be and and because also there's that
102:06 cycle things are pretty expensive if you
102:10 have interest rates Rising you know
102:12 there are these issues we can't get
102:16 so ignoring those that we um be in the
102:20 face of the AI thing um
102:24 and then you have to do it within two
102:26 years and it's got to stick because
102:30 midterm elections will swing um are
102:33 going to be harder for the Republicans
102:35 because they have more seats up so uh so
102:43 um so it's going to be
102:46 interesting um you're an entrepreneur or
102:49 I'm an entrepreneur
102:52 you're your
102:54 advice looking
102:56 forward thinking about you know planning
103:00 your business for the next year or two
103:03 years uh what's your wisdom you're at a
103:07 you're at a time of
103:09 relatively
103:12 um good Capital
103:14 markets credit spreads are narrow
103:17 there's a lot of
103:19 money
103:21 um um
103:25 plan
103:28 on Surviving droughts as well
103:33 as um the difficult time you know the
103:37 good times fill your Equity
103:39 cers
103:42 yeah don't take on too don't take on too
103:45 much
103:46 debt plan for realistic
103:50 growth and and um
103:55 make great
103:57 partners with the investors that are in
104:00 it um ultimately it's going to
104:05 be and not only your numbers but it's
104:07 going to be your character and
104:11 um you know don't be overly greedy
104:14 but um so have the relationships as well
104:19 as the
104:20 money that is your foundation
104:23 yeah I think that's beautiful wisdom Ray
104:27 uh grateful for you thank you for making
104:30 uh your research available and and
104:32 writing these books and I I I sure wish
104:36 uh we humans uh were a bit more
104:40 intelligent or a bit more uh uh had
104:43 longer memories um you know I I do
104:47 wonder sometimes whether AI can help us
104:49 get out of these repeated cycles and
104:53 support us in uh in in more uh logical
104:57 planning and growth um I guess we're
105:00 going to find out maybe if we ask it the
105:02 qu right
105:05 questions H oh good to see you my friend
105:08 thank you again for your time grateful
105:10 for you it's always a pleasure thank you
105:12 Peter thank you buddy
105:22 [Music]