Hang tight while we fetch the video data and transcripts. This only takes a moment.
Connecting to YouTube player…
Fetching transcript data…
We’ll display the transcript, summary, and all view options as soon as everything loads.
Next steps
Loading transcript tools…
Francis Lucille: A Masterclass In Non-Duality | Essentia Foundation | YouTubeToText
YouTube Transcript: Francis Lucille: A Masterclass In Non-Duality
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Video Summary
Summary
Core Theme
The core theme is the exploration of non-duality and the nature of consciousness, positing that reality is a single, unified consciousness, and our individual selves are expressions or viewpoints within this larger reality.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
Consciousness
through creating the universe, it sort
of learns about itself. What does this
mean? Because people often ask this
question [music] already. This question implicitly
implicitly
assumes duality.
What adva means? It means not two. No,
it means there is only one reality. It
means there is no there's no two or more
realities. There is only one reality.
Don't I have a self then?
>> Yes, you have a self just as you have a car.
car.
You drive your car through the world. In
the same way [music] you drive this body
mind through the world, but ultimately
you are the reality of both this body
mind and the [music] world.
It's not like Shiva being conscious,
[music] pure conscious and shaki being
the world, the energy. It's not like
they exist separately from each other.
In the act of creation, of perception,
the world takes birth at every [music]
moment. Natalia, the bad news
is that
you don't have free will. The good news
is that the one who doesn't have free
Hello Francis, it's a pleasure to
welcome you to our channel. You're
spiritual leader in the tradition or
spiritual teacher rather in the
tradition of advant correct.
>> People think I am a teacher.
>> And who do you consider yourself to be? >> Nobody.
>> Nobody.
[laughter] Everybody.
>> Okay. What is it that you are doing? [laughter]
>> The the teacher appears when there is a
question. You know, in other words,
everybody is a teacher. When we are
asked a question and we answer the
question to the best of our ability, to
the best of our knowledge with
authenticity and
the the the human
human
body mind is in fact an instrument. And
it's a channel just as these earphones
or this TV set, this computer, this
camera, they are they are part parts of
>> Interesting. I have some questions
there. But first I wanted to ask you
because I was uh looking at your life
path preparing for this interview and I
thought what an amazing transformation
you you went through because you started
as an atheist a materialist with a
background in mathematics and physics.
You worked in the defense industry and
how and why did you become well let's
call it spiritual teacher for the sake
of the argument? Uh well I I first
became interested in uh
philosophy in consciousness in reality
these kind of fundamental questions
and uh
that happens to me. Uh
I had problems with my life because I
had achieved everything that [snorts]
my parents were consider considered to
be the recipes for happiness and in fact
I was miserable. You know a good job,
good education,
uh two cars in the driveway, a house
etc. And but I was miserable. I got
divorced, was sick. Uh I was bored with
my job and um
and so uh I was seeking a solution to this
this
problem. I was seeking happiness and in
a bookstore in Paris in the Latin Quarter.
Quarter. I
I
I was attracted by a book by Krishna
Merti and I went to a nearby bistro.
It was in the spring and
and
three hours later I I had read all the
books and I came back to the bookstore.
I bought all the books by this author.
So that triggered a very intense
[snorts] surge. Then I went become
interested in Zen in
India, Hindu philosophy, talism,
uh early Christianity etc. All the all
the religions basically and all the philosophies
philosophies
that's how it started.
>> Why did you sort of stick with advite?
Was it more appealing than than Buddhism
or Christianity or any other tradition?
>> No. All these all these traditions uh
you know if there is one truth one
reality it is the same for all. So
ultimately different expression. If they
are authentic, if they come from this
authentic experience are simply
different ways of expressing the same experience
experience
and these ways change
depending on the local culture in which
are expressed. So they change
uh over space and over time.
And uh
for me spirituality is not different
from philosophy. Right? Philosophy is
ethmologically means the love for
wisdom. And my teacher defined wisdom as
the science of happiness
or I would say the art of live of living
a fulfilling life. So that would be my
definition of wisdom. In other sense,
uh philosophy is not about more
acquiring more knowledge. It is very
different in that sense from physics or
math or where
science works through extension
expansion and it's a kind of
[clears throat] infinite
expansion knowledge.
Uh whereas um true philosophy is not about
about
knowing more.
It's about living, finding happiness,
finding peace, inner peace. Uh I often quote
quote
a definition of philosophy by French
almost 20th century philosophers.
I think it's Jack Maritan who said
uh the goal of philosophy
is to um
liberate oneself from fear [snorts]
You see, so I I go a little further than
that. So all these tradition, all these
boil down to the same essence if you
will. And uh in my case
after I became interested in this at
some point I wanted to meet someone
who would uh
be an example who could show me okay
what does that mean to live in inner
peace you see so I was seeking for a
teacher and I met a gentleman
in the south of France
>> Jean Klene
>> Jean Klein and
he had met his teacher in India and
[clears throat] so that was the
tradition of advita vidanta
but both John Clan and I we
we were not fundamentalists in the sense
of quite the opposite. He would
recognize the the truth in many
different traditions and also the
absence thereof in many traditions
So for you then philosophy and because
advita vidanta is also a philosophy of
course it's a spiritual tradition but
it's also considered philosophical
tradition because what you're saying is
that you are employing um introspection.
So for you spirituality and philosophy
if not the same at least they are very
much intertwined. Is that correct?
Well, true philosophy or
perennial philosophy
and uh spirituality
are the same and that's very different
from religion. uh it becomes religion
the moment there is addition to a belief
but what I mean addition I mean
additioning with exclusion [clears throat]
[clears throat]
addition and exclus add addition to to a
practice to a right type of behavior and
that doesn't recognize other possibilities
possibilities
you see so it is this at that moment but
the most important definition for me for
for that that establishes a distinction is
is
the moment there is an element of belief
that comes into play
as long as it be as it remains purely
experimental it's philosophy
or spirituality
>> I understand and I guess religions are
also most of them have institutions
which I think advice evidant that
doesn't have a
>> I don't know
>> a centralized church and and a pope and
all that stuff.
>> You [laughter] see
what advita means? It means not two. No,
it means there is only one reality. It
means there is no there's no two or more
realities. There is only one reality.
Okay. So I was looking one day there is
at the Stanford University there is on
they have a website and there is
something about a part of it which is
about philosophy
and I looked into it about monism which
is in fact the Latin equivalent Greek
monos only one only one reality monis
means advita means nonuality but when I
look into the website I could see that
there were distinctions between six or
seven I don't remember kinds of monism
how is that possible
if there is only one reality that's it
everything is this single reality right
you cannot make a distinction between
because if this monism is different from
that monism
it means that at least one of these
denies that there is only one reality
that's The point that I was making by
saying no exclusion in this sense you
know no addition to
it all flows in the moment
>> when you say it's nondual tradition
could you maybe say a few words what
does this mean because people often ask
this question
>> yeah well there are two kinds of
traditions there is I would say
tradition with a small T and tradition
there are many of those I learned math
and physics in the sense that's a
tradition we have a tradition of math it
was given to me by my teacher in the
books I read right I learn so there are
many tradition tradition means that
which gets transmitted right and
the so you can transmit a prayer you can
transmit a mantra you can transmit a way
of behavior you can transmit all these
things, dos and don'ts, you know, the
the the the ten commandments, you can
transmit belief system, Jesus was born
out of a virgin. You can transmit many
things, but all of these traditions with
a small of what they have in common is
that they transmit
forms. >> [snorts]
>> [snorts]
>> They transmit
What I'm talking about here, the
tradition with a capital T is a
transmission of the experience of consciousness.
consciousness.
The transmission of the experience of
our true nature as human being as consciousness.
consciousness.
And that is the same for all when it
when we get it.
You see, so that's why there is only
real tradition and that that's really
the only one that counts and in a sense
I now know that that was the reason I
was seeking
uh to meet my teacher.
>> If you had to describe a couple of
points, what are the key premises of
your teachings?
Well, if I if I say that
uh and I will say it, but that's only a pointer
pointer and
and
the pointer is very simple. There is
only one reality.
If you ask me
what does reality means, I mean that
which exists in itself for itself by itself.
itself.
And u
if you ask me then what the only
uh a
nonduality is if you will is there is
only one reality.
are defined. And then if you ask me,
can you experientially
point at this reality?
I would say whatever it is which is
really hearing my words right now
is this reality.
You see, because there is there is only
one reality.
And whatever it is [snorts] that is
hearing them
>> And you call that reality consciousness.
>> Oh, you can call it whatever you want.
You know, [clears throat] usually we
call it consciousness. Whatever it is,
we just hearing these words, we call it
consciousness usually. But you can call
it whatever you want because we can call
it I because we say I am hearing the
words. It's not somebody else.
It's me. So uh [clears throat] we can
call it I or self or my true nature. My
true identity. Your true nature. Your
true identity.
>> Yeah. [snorts] The words are tricky
because that's where we all get confused
because we all mean something else. You
know consciousness for me is one thing
for you it's something else and then we
try to have a conversation
>> or what is it for you?
>> I actually agree with your definition
but I think under analytic idealism the
terminology is more like mind or mind at
large which is part of the universal
consciousness. I think that's that's how
analytic idealism sort of panned it. But
ultimately, yes, it's it's
consciousness, fundamental, irreducible.
>> It doesn't matter whether we call it
mind. For instance, in the Zen
tradition, they tend to call it mind.
Uh and what they call consciousness,
most people what they call consciousness
is the content of consciousness.
And uh but I think the the the the
big the big obstacle to this liberating
experience I talk about and the
traditions talk about
is the belief that there is
that there is an absolute or universal
And at the same time that there are
many consciousnesses,
individual consciousnesses
or that there are many uh
many perceivers
and that's the fundamental thing. So if
we talk about idealism for instance,
if you look at Bishop Barklay for
instance, his form of idealism if is
like the the latter was he believes that
there are many consciousnesses. After
all, he is a bishop, you know, he does
it cannot go against the teaching of the
church, right? He believed that there is
many there are many consciousness and
that therefore we are separate individual
individual
and that independently from those there
is God's consciousness shining or the
universal consciousness shining out
there. The problem with this is that God
remains or universal consciousness
remains at the infinite distance from our
our
own consciousness.
This conscious of of us [clears throat]
of ours poor mortals.
And the big
the big step
is the realization that there is no such
a limited consciousness.
That actually in this moment
whatever is hearing my words
is precisely this universal consciousness.
consciousness.
>> Okay Francis, but what do I do with
this? I have a birth date. I have a
name. I woke up this morning. I had
coffee and
for breakfast. Sorry, I couldn't
[laughter] resist my French. [gasps]
And it's, you know, I have plans for
tomorrow. I have memories. I have
parents. I have friends. So, what am I
then? Who am I? Don't Don't I have a
self? Then
>> you live your life just as Yes, you have
a self just as you have a car.
You drive your car through the city and
through the world. In the same way, you
drive this body mind through the world.
But ultimately, you are the reality of
both this body mind and the world.
>> Isn't that duality?
>> No, that's the opposite. You are the
reality of both the body, mind, and [clears throat]
[clears throat]
the world.
the the the apparent diversity between
the body mind and the world arose only
because you asked the question and for
me to answer your question I have to
answer your question at your level I
have to answer the question in the world
in which there are quason and some are
good some quasants are not that good so [laughter]
>> okay appreciate
Um, but how do I know it's true? Because
all I know is this my experiences, you
know, touch, smell, sight, uh, you know,
emotions, thoughts. What kind of, you
know, universal whatever big
consciousness are you talking about?
>> Okay. Okay. The question is how do I
know that this consciousness which is
hearing my words right now
is not limited. Correct?
That it is eternal. That it is the
reality of all things.
>> Yeah. How do I know?
>> How do I know? Okay. First answer. How
do I know that it isn't? What's your evidence?
evidence? [snorts]
[snorts]
>> My sensory [clears throat] p perceptions
and and and um the thinking and all the
you know biological processes which are
at least a correlates of those at least
>> correlates of of what
>> of my thoughts, my emotions, my memories.
memories.
There is no problem
>> brain activity.
>> That's a good question. I should ask you that.
that.
>> All of that. All of that appears in your
Right.
>> In terms of being my awareness. That's
what you're in this.
>> Well, all of that appears in you.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I can register most of it.
it.
>> Yeah. Most of it I can register. There
are some subconscious processes which I
don't register right in body.
>> Well, that's that's a different story
because if you don't perceive them,
>> they are not experienced. >> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> They are concepts
but they are not facts.
>> Well, they are measured by by by by
science. Science tells me that my brain
my brain decides uh uh to lower the
temperature or to you know to increase
the temperature or how it keeps the the
blood uh uh acidity on a certain level
in certain organs. I don't control that.
That's that's subconsciously done.
Science tells me
>> the fact I'm not denying that
there are facts that
that
I'm not denying that. And [clears throat]
[clears throat]
I'm not dying
that because if I ask you what were you
thinking this morning while having your
crossome you don't remember all of your
thoughts it doesn't mean you didn't have
thoughts at that time right so I'm not
denying anything but what I am talking
about is this any evidence we may have
that consciousness is limited what I
call consciousness
whatever it that whatever is hearing my
words right now
whatever you call it what do you what
are you calling it
>> I don't know awareness I'm aware of I'm
hearing your your thoughts I'm aware of
of them I think about them I analyze them
them >> okay
>> okay
whatever evidence you have that this
awareness which is hearing my words
right now is limited in any fashion or
form. What whatever evidence you have is
appearing in this awareness. Right. >> Correct.
>> Correct.
>> And that's the only way you have access
to this evidence only way. Right.
Right.
>> Yep. Yep. Now,
how could possibly
something that appears in your awareness
give you some information
It's like it's like you have an astronomer,
astronomer, right?
right?
Looking at galaxies, stars,
how could possibly whatever is seen by
the astronomer
give us any information
on the astronomer? whether it's a man, a
woman, the age, the color of the eyes,
the color of the of the of the skin, the
whatever is. So if you if you if you
take this analogy,
it will lead to a deep understanding
that whatever you perceive in awareness
cannot tell you any experiential
information about the awareness that
perceives it.
And from understanding what I have just
mentioned, if you go deeply into it,
that whatever is perceived in awareness
[snorts] cannot deliver any information
on the awareness that perceives it. It
follows that in particular as a
corollary in particular
whatever is perceived in awareness
by us by others
cannot tell us cannot answer questions
such as is awareness limited
in space in time does it have a beginning
beginning
in time does it have an end if you look
at your awareness Yes. Do you remember
when it began? Can you assign a beginning?
beginning?
>> No. First memories from my early
childhood. I think that's the earliest I could.
could.
>> Yeah. But that that that's about
something that appears in awareness, but
not about the awareness, right?
>> Yeah, that's correct. Yes. Yes.
>> So, and if you cannot answer this
question, do you think that I can answer
this question better or that the pope
can answer better? No. No. The question
is I don't have an answer to this
question. I don't have an answer. Okay,
that's very important [snorts] and
that's very important because believe
many people believe awareness begins
awareness ends.
That's a religion. We were talking about
religion. That's precisely a religion.
What a religion is is a is a belief
without any experiential foundation.
It's a religion. It's useless.
It's detrimental to our happiness to
believe that we begin and that we end
because once and then I'm trying to go
move towards [snorts]
your your objection. Now that we have established
established
I hope for good forever that we have no
evidence whatsoever that awareness is
limited in any fashion or form.
>> We can't exclude it. No. From my
experience, my localized experience, I
cannot exclude that. Yes.
>> Okay. Let's move one step further. If
you're a scientist, right, and
and
let's say you are going to measure the
spin of an electron around a certain
axis and it can have two value either
plus one/2 or negative one/2, right?
right?
And if you have no knowledge whatsoever
about this electron, you have never met
this electron before.
And if you are asked what is the
rational way to assign the probabilities
between the two possible outcome, what
>> Probability 50/50. I don't know
>> exactly. No, no, it's not that you don't know.
know.
>> I don't have prior experience or prior
measurements which give me something
else. I I would say 50/50. [laughter]
>> Exactly. If if I have no clue whether
whether I would meet this person
tomorrow or not, you know, no clue
whatsoever. You see, or whatever. I I I
toss a coin. have no clue whether it's
going to be uh heads or tails, you know,
the logical way to behave is 50/50. [laughter]
[laughter]
Some people when you tell them what I've
just told you, they forget it. They say,
"Okay, yeah, that's interesting. It's
odd. It makes sense what Francis says,
but I'm not going to investigate that
further. I'm not really interested
because I'm more interested in my quasa
in my whatever in my science whatever.
But some people they say wow
that makes sense.
Let's investigate this evidence I have [snorts]
[snorts]
or I believe to have in science, in neurology,
neurology,
psychology, whatever, physics,
chemistry, biology,
whatever evidence I have that
consciousness is separate
and or not. [snorts]
But the problem is that when we do the
when we conduct this investigation,
we discover yes, Francis is absolutely
right. I have no
solid evidence whatsoever.
I have no solid evidence whatsoever. And
then that's when we reach the true 5050
allocation of probabilities if you will.
You see
now how to go further?
How to go further? And
And
there are two paths [snorts]
to go further.
I call them the path of the
mathematician and the path of the physicist.
physicist.
>> They're different.
>> Of course.
>> Okay. Science. Science to me. Okay.
Please, please go ahead. I'm really
curious now.
>> Well, mathematics is about mathematical
ideas. [snorts]
Physics is about the world. Mathematics
has nothing to do with the world.
Physics has everything to do with the world.
world.
Mathematics is a language which is used
to do physics. And
And
it is strangely efficient.
There are the path of the
mathematicians, the path of the phys.
But this this is a metaphor. It's an
analogy. It's not really that we are
going to use mathematics or physics.
what I call the the path of the
physicist is an experiential path to
to
what we do in physics you know let's say
we don't do we don't know what the spin
of this electron is well we we send it
to a stern and gala uh device and if it
turns left it's plus if it turns right
it's minus and that's it you know So in
other words, by conducting the
experiment, we ask nature a question.
By looking at the outcome, we get the
answer. Right? So here is the
the
description
of the past of the physicist. In this regard,
regard, we
we
in our life
we come at
forks on the road so to speak
in which for instance the decision we make
make
would be different
depending on whether
present in a relation with a person
whether your consciousness And my
consciousness is the same. Not a similar
one, but exactly the same. In other
words, whether you are me and I am you,
whether I am universal or whether we are
separate consciousnesses.
You see,
you could envision situation in which
the decision will be different.
It happens often in life, right? When
egoism comes comes in in a decision we
make for instance [snorts] or when
stupidity comes in and then we we
conduct experiment because we have the
choice we have the freedom either to go
the multiple consciousnesses path or the
the only one consciousness path or the
only one awareness path
and then we look at the outcome.
there's going to be an outcome and we we
look at the outcome in two ways. What
happens in the world as a result
and what happens within us also
and my contention is this [snorts]
is that in both
in both sides on both sides [snorts]
if we take what I call the impersonal
decision in other words the one which is predicated
predicated >> [snorts]
>> [snorts]
>> Upon the assumption that consciousness
is universal that in your terms that's
awareness is universal
the outcome will be an increase in
harmony happiness peace both externally
and internally
I'm not I don't mean that the world is
going to to change immediately you know
but what I'm going what but What I'm
saying is the world is is going to be a
better place and that we are to going to
be in a better place to express myself
in lay using lay language right. So as
we multiply these experiments,
you see, we tend to accumulate a body of
evidence [snorts] that points towards
that changes the allocation of
probabilities [snorts] from 50/50 to a different
different distribution.
distribution.
Right? So that that's the uh experiential
the
the path of the mathematician
It has to do with the experience of pure
are not aware of the possibility of the
exist of the experience of pure
consciousness meaning consciousness
They believe that awareness is always
exist always with a perception, with a
and the the experience with perception I
call it phenomenal experience.
The experience of pure awareness I call
it numinal experience in contra
distinction with the other. So the
phenomenal experience
has two features, two qualities
that are not present in the experience
of pure consciousness.
The first
feature of phenomenal experience is that
it's time. It elapses in time. There is duration.
The second feature
is that it can never be 100% certain.
That's interesting
for the following reason.
Remember that when you dream, when we dream,
dream,
we believe that the content of the dream
is real.
Right? If a tiger
is assaulting us, we are afraid, right?
Meaning we believe it's a real tiger, right?
right?
>> In the dream. Of course.
>> In the dream. Yes. Exactly. In the
dream. So since
whatever is phenomenally perceived in
uh
cannot tell us that we are dreaming. Right?
Right?
How can be sure that now the phenomenal
is telling us that we are not dreaming?
In other words, we cannot be sure
that the phenomenal content of our
experience is real.
We cannot be sure that this
vase or this object in front of me
exists independently from my mind. I
cannot be sure. Right?
Okay. going back to because we are
trying I was trying to make the
distinction between phenomenal and
numinal or nonfenomomenal experience
it's different
regarding the experience of consciousness
consciousness
if I ask you are you conscious
what say you
>> I would say yes very likely that I
because I I have feelings I have a a
feeling of a body. I am hearing what
you're saying. I'm analyzing it. So, I
have thoughts and I have questions. So,
it gives me a feeling that I am >> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> conscious. I'm aware.
>> So, uh and you you know that you are
conscious from direct experience, right?
In other words, not from hearsay, not
because your dad has told you you know
you are at some point you are, you know,
you're conscious. Oh, wow. I wasn't
conscious before. No. No. Right. You you
know it from direct experience.
>> in instant? Yeah.
>> Instantness, you know. So in other
words, we derive this certainty of
consciousness from from an experience
which seems not to have duration in time
but which comes with absolute certainty
unlike the phenomenal experience of of
whatever we see around us. You see two
very distinctive features.
And the reason why this experience of
pure consciousness through which we know
that we are conscious
the reason why it seems to be instantaneous
instantaneous
is because there are no perception
there. You see, in order to have a time,
the sense that time elapses,
we need to have perceptions.
Like the the hand of the clock moves
from here to here, you see. And uh
without perception,
it's instantaneous
already. When you when we don't memorize,
memorize,
it seems that time has not elapsed.
after Anastasia for instance we have
been out for two hours and it seems that
right so
>> but my mind puts it in a timeline so I
have a registration right so we started
the conversation I ask so many questions
and so the moments the instances the
moment continue but then my mind puts it
in a specific timeline am I correct yeah okay
okay
>> yes you go back to the dream if you will
and in the dream
You have the timeline just as in your
dream you have a dream. You have the
dream that
in the past you got married and then you
had this child and then your husband
passed away and the child passed away.
Right? You wake up where was this
marriage? Where was this time? Where was
his first child? This where
it was in the moment of the dream. There
was no past. But by going back, if you
could go back to the dream, then of course.
course.
Yes. So all it boils down to is this
distinction between first person
experience and third person experience.
You see, we conduct science from a third
person experience vantage point. And
it has its usefulness
because in a sense
we have to move in a world where
third person experience works
that this dream. But in terms of
happiness, of love, of beauty, of peace,
of understanding, of harmony, there is a
different dimension
other than that which is to which
practical life
uh uh applies and
in which we do physics.
Uh there is a different world,
a different place. I wouldn't say a
world no different place just as there
is a different place in which we do math
which is not the world we don't do math
in the world
you know what got me um is actually
um out of body experiences during
near-death experiences when people were
brought into operating theater in coma
and left in coma and the brain was in a
state of clinical death so the apparatus
was not working and yet the person comes
back and perfectly describes not just
some beautiful colors, lights and
everything, some random stuff. No, no,
no. The person describes what was in in
operating theater, recognizes the nurses
saying, "Please bring my dentals back.
You took them out because you wanted to
intubate me." So, so incredibly specific
stuff that you can't even call it
hallucination. So that that really got
me because [laughter]
there must be something to it because if
the body is not functioning at all and
our doctors are saying thinking dreaming
even hallucinations are not possible
because there is no brain activity
whatsoever [laughter and gasps] and then
person comes back with the story I don't
know how to explain it
>> yeah and and that's and that's the
reason why it becomes obvious that
first person experience and third person
experience don't coincide they are Not
the same experience obviously. So for
instance when we say someone is conscious
conscious
from a medical vantage point you know
the doctor declared in this in the case
of this patient
he is unconscious or even his brain dead
brain dead right but the first based on
experience which is a real consciousness
is different. So we should have two def
two different word. One which is being
conscious as a first person consciousness
consciousness
and the second one will be to be
declared conscious as a third person
definition of consciousness and they
don't coincide experientially. We know
that they don't coincide. So what I'm
when so that's very important because
when I talk about consciousness I'm
talking always about first person consciousness
consciousness
because it is the only consciousness
which is experienced.
The other consciousness is not experienced.
experienced.
We experience feature of a body or the
absence of electrical signals in the
brain but we don't experience the
consciousness of the other person. You see,
see,
so the only consciousness with the or
awareness which is truly experienced is
the first person one. The other one is a fake
fake
consciousness. It has its value. Of course,
course,
I want to be resuscitated, right? I
[snorts] don't care what they call me,
but the one I'm talking about is the one
we actually experience. It's our true
experience of consciousness. And uh this
one we have to be open to the possibility
possibility that
that
it is not limited
by anything that it is not dependent
upon the body and that it is not
localized in space or time because we
have no evidence, [snorts]
zero evidence
that it is the case. And as a result,
we are allowed to be open to the
possibility to the other possibility
that it is universal and that in fact
it is the reality of everything or that
the reality of everything
>> I have an example from our YouTube
channel audience. Uh it's a metaphor so
bear with me has some description and
would be helpful to get your thoughts on
that. So here it goes. Um, if
consciousness is all there is and we are
just its viewpoints,
it must be like a single actor in a
theater playing multiple characters at
the same time and each of them with
amnesia so that they don't know they are
one and the same actor.
Of course, the theater, the material
universe exists only because this actor
exists. And the irony is that the
characters feel that there is more to
life than just their roles. They have
this inner striving to seek the truth
built in them. So and some discover
there this one actor but they have to
keep on playing their roles in the play.
So what's the point of this game and why
has it started as if it if it has
started in the first place? And I have
uh some some speculations that we can
offer you Francis. You don't have to
take them. Um so one is is the actor
trying to deal with extreme loneliness.
So it's hard even to imagine oneself
alone with nothing and nobody. You
probably would trade any experience in
this world for for being completely
alone and completely. The second option
um is love.
Why don't you why don't you take them
one by one?
>> Okay, let's take them one by one. Good
good point. So, what do you think? Start
with is is the metaphor correct more or
less in terms of describing the nature
of reality?
>> The metaphor is correct. It's it's nice
and but like any analogy it has its limitation
limitation >> simplifications
>> simplifications
>> and it reaches its limitation
with this first explanation
the loneliness. [snorts]
So because the assumption is that
consciousness when it is alone in other
words without objects is miserable is
lonely and that's quite the opposite.
But consciousness in this aloneeness
is pure happiness pure joy pure eternity.
eternity.
And out of this eternity there is a kind
of desire to to enjoy the fullest of its
creative powers. And then it creates
that it creates all this mess. Right? So [snorts]
[snorts]
[laughter] this first explanation comes
definitely from ignorance comes from an
absence of experience of pure consciousness.
consciousness. >> [snorts]
>> [snorts]
>> So I think you are closer to the second
speculation we have which is is love the
inherent nature of this actor and so it
is compelled to create someone else to
love and that's a postulate from cabal
as well
specific
Love is the experience
by two beings of their oneness,
right? By two being. But that's not what
love is, right?
right? Uh
Uh
when two apparent apparently separate
beings experience love,
they discover that they are the
universal being which is very different.
They become the all the whole. Right?
That's a true experience of love. And
this experience of love then of course
is not limited to
relationships for instance or to
you can have the same feeling with the
creation with nature. You know, you you
drive down from your hill and you see
the you see the beautiful city and the
distant mountain and the sky and and and
you think, "Oh, God,
your creation is so beautiful, you know,
and and it's love. It's not just love
for a person, you know, but the smile
you exchange with a stranger in the bus,
you know, that's also a moment of where
we lose our distance, right? we lose our
distance. We we won't see this person we
won't see this person again in our life.
Right? It it's it's this this
recognition of our oneness. Uh [clears throat]
[clears throat]
so so the experience of love is not like
two hands [laughter]
that come together and becomes one hand
which is still limited.
is two hands that come in this coming
together dissolve
And the last speculation if is it true
or not
or is it dreaming the reality into
existence its inherent nature not love
or not just love and then the whole
universe this theater with all the
characters is its ultimate dream as some
spiritual traditions uh [clears throat]
postulate that it is
>> yeah but but but it's a dream out of
love because it is love that dreams a
dream it is Vishnu that dreams
the the world but Vishnu is love itself.
So he cannot be present at that separate
reality alternatives. Uh yes in a sense
it is a dream. It is a dream in
reference to its absolute reality.
Right? In other words the world is a
dream. Yes, the world is a dream only to
the extent that it is seen as different
When the world is seen as consciousness itself,
itself,
it's no longer a doing. It's reality.
You see that's that's that's very important.
important.
uh in [clears throat] in the Indian
tradition they say uh it's not like
Shiva being conscious pure conscious and
shaki being the world the energy it's
not like they exist
separately from each other no it's just
that Shiva
becomes Shaki and Shaki becomes Shiva in
the act of creation of perception uh the World
World
takes birth at every moment and the
birth the world gets anhilated at every
moment. You know it's a we think that
things are material you know even even
from the vantage point of science of
physics you know we think of that's this
table here it's solid in fact if I go down
down
to the atomic level and to the subatomic level
level
it's only space
it's only space it's just because there
are electromagnetic forces that create
this seeming
uh solidity but in fact it's only space
and in this space
we think that we have a little pieces of granite
granite
called particles. No, even that is not
true. You know what we have is fields
and exitation of these fields and
interaction between these fields and
it's all a continuous movement like like
the ocean you see. So
our view our I I I I could the caveman
or woman view of the world you know is
very simplistic
and it doesn't jive with a more profound
view that we acquire through scientific knowledge
knowledge
and this more profound view of we
removes
the matter light quality of the world
like matter like like being made of
little pieces of metal or little pieces
of stone. Right? This matter like
remains in our common psyche, right? But
it it gets removed. It it becomes more
like emptiness. [snorts] The the vacuum
actually we have this thing we have we
have the the vacuum state in in in in
quantum physics the the vacuum state and
and excitements.
So exitations.
So it becomes something more intangible,
more transparent, more awareness like.
And so
that opens then the possibility for the
ultimate reality of the world once it
has lost through this scientific
investigation, right? lost its matter
like quality, its solidity, it becomes
something very different. And once
consciousness, awareness
through our investigation
has been differentiated from the objects
of consciousness, the thoughts, the
perceptions. So that consciousness is
not seen as a thought
not as as the content of consciousness
but as this invisible presence.
So then that makes possible for the two
to be the same. You see for the the
fundamental equation you know of
But what is the point of this game?
What's the purpose of it all? Did has it
have beginning? Will it have an end? >> What
>> What
>> human mind wants to know? We want to know.
know.
Do you have an idea or speculation, hypothesis?
hypothesis?
>> Because it's enjoyable. Because the game
the game is really about consciousness. [snorts] It has it has been about
[snorts] It has it has been about consciousness
consciousness all along. All along that was we were
all along. All along that was we were seeking. It's it's a kind of a game of
seeking. It's it's a kind of a game of hide and seek with ourselves. We have
hide and seek with ourselves. We have lost
lost and it's like the boy scouts, you know,
and it's like the boy scouts, you know, we we have this treasure hunt type of
we we have this treasure hunt type of game, right? in Boy Scouts and uh and
game, right? in Boy Scouts and uh and there are signs and we first see the
there are signs and we first see the first signs and our interest gets
first signs and our interest gets high stronger stronger strong right and
high stronger stronger strong right and we we move to the treasure but then life
we we move to the treasure but then life is about celebration and whatever that
is about celebration and whatever that which is visible
which is visible celebrates the invisible
celebrates the invisible everything then there is no preference
everything then there is no preference our relationships
our relationships are a celebr celebration or our
are a celebr celebration or our encounters, our uh being in nature, the
encounters, our uh being in nature, the the the quasa in the morning.
the the quasa in the morning. All of that, the tea, you know, the the
All of that, the tea, you know, the the perfume of of vanilla when I I I I make
perfume of of vanilla when I I I I make my waffles in the morning. Look, all of
my waffles in the morning. Look, all of that is part of the celebration. But
that is part of the celebration. But what it is that we like the most, and
what it is that we like the most, and that's something
that's something that which we love really is
that which we love really is consciousness.
consciousness. We love consciousness in all beings.
We love consciousness in all beings. That's love. What we understand as love
That's love. What we understand as love usually. But consciousness is the unique
usually. But consciousness is the unique object of our love. And
object of our love. And but it is so
but it is so present
present that
that we take it for granted.
It's like someone who all of a sudden gets COVID, cannot
who all of a sudden gets COVID, cannot breathe any longer, gets intubated, you
breathe any longer, gets intubated, you know. And he says, "Oh, if only I could
know. And he says, "Oh, if only I could breathe again. I don't care about money.
breathe again. I don't care about money. I don't care about fame. I If I only
I don't care about fame. I If I only could breathe the way I used to." You
could breathe the way I used to." You see? But as long as he was breathing, he
see? But as long as he was breathing, he was taking it for granted, right? And
was taking it for granted, right? And now it has become become its most
now it has become become its most precious
precious good.
good. But think about consciousness. It's even
But think about consciousness. It's even more precious to us [snorts] than the
more precious to us [snorts] than the breath.
breath. And that's and that's what that's the
And that's and that's what that's the experiential
experiential reason
reason for me to say that that which love the
for me to say that that which love the most is consciousness. We just forget
most is consciousness. We just forget it.
it. What do you think about this? Another
What do you think about this? Another hypothesis or another explanation I've
hypothesis or another explanation I've heard which sort of makes sense to me
heard which sort of makes sense to me but I'm I'm wondering about your
but I'm I'm wondering about your thoughts that consciousness through
thoughts that consciousness through creating the universe through
creating the universe through experiencing
experiencing itself. It sort of learns about itself.
itself. It sort of learns about itself. It's like a night cannot see itself. So
It's like a night cannot see itself. So it has to create something which would
it has to create something which would reflect back in order. But so as it as
reflect back in order. But so as it as it's doing something through us and
it's doing something through us and through everything which exists, it sort
through everything which exists, it sort of learns about what it is.
of learns about what it is. >> Yes. But you see the question you ask
>> Yes. But you see the question you ask uh the question you ask is
on on all all these three possibilities that we envision, right? It's
that we envision, right? It's what's the goal? What's the purpose?
what's the goal? What's the purpose? Right? And already this question
Right? And already this question implicitly
implicitly assumes duality
assumes duality right because a goal is to move from
right because a goal is to move from here to there.
here to there. It takes duality for granted. Whereas
It takes duality for granted. Whereas advant say no no no I'm sorry you are
advant say no no no I'm sorry you are making when you ask this question you
making when you ask this question you are already cooked because you are
are already cooked because you are already buying into evolution from here
already buying into evolution from here to there you see as being important.
to there you see as being important. No [clears throat]
No [clears throat] uh this reality is perfectly happy
uh this reality is perfectly happy within itself and of itself and besides
within itself and of itself and besides there is nothing outside of it. You see
there is nothing outside of it. You see uh it's like a and when I say this
uh it's like a and when I say this reality moves it's important to
reality moves it's important to understand because
understand because when we talk about motion
when we talk about motion there are two possibility let's say I
there are two possibility let's say I say everything we see is like the waves
say everything we see is like the waves in the in the ocean right it's it's it's
in the in the ocean right it's it's it's like everything we see is a movement of
like everything we see is a movement of consciousness
but then there is another way to understand the
there is another way to understand the movement of consciousness. It's like
movement of consciousness. It's like taking the Atlantic Ocean and
taking the Atlantic Ocean and transporting it [snorts] where the
transporting it [snorts] where the Pacific Ocean is. You see, in other
Pacific Ocean is. You see, in other words, it's no longer a movement of the
words, it's no longer a movement of the ocean within itself.
ocean within itself. It's a movement of the ocean itself.
It's a movement of the ocean itself. So consciousness,
So consciousness, when I say conscious, there is a
when I say conscious, there is a consciousness moves, it moves within
consciousness moves, it moves within itself.
itself. But not out of itself to a different
But not out of itself to a different place because there is no other place
place because there is no other place for reality to go. Right.
for reality to go. Right. >> Yeah. It's like there is only Pacific
>> Yeah. It's like there is only Pacific Ocean. Nothing else [laughter] exists.
Ocean. Nothing else [laughter] exists. Right.
Right. Taking your example to an extreme.
Taking your example to an extreme. [laughter]
Have you had a direct experience of this actor, this pure consciousness? What
actor, this pure consciousness? What it's like?
Uh many people have that. It's just they
many people have that. It's just they don't recognize it. Uh some people
don't recognize it. Uh some people have
have a very decisive experience
a very decisive experience and uh
and uh with great great clarity
with great great clarity that lives uh
that lives uh in the mind the body mind
in the mind the body mind an unreason unerasable
imprint >> [snorts]
>> [snorts] >> Other people
>> Other people have this experience
have this experience and then the mind apparently has not
and then the mind apparently has not been transformed.
been transformed. But eventually
But eventually this experience comes back back back and
this experience comes back back back and glimpse after glimpses.
glimpse after glimpses. uh that which matters in a sense, but
uh that which matters in a sense, but ultimately nothing matters. But um
ultimately nothing matters. But um because even those who had this
because even those who had this life
life changing experience
changing experience uh
uh they can come back to life as usual and
they can come back to life as usual and to misery
to misery for a while.
for a while. they need to get some process whereby
they need to get some process whereby they get kind stable in this inner
they get kind stable in this inner peace.
peace. Uh and the ones who had a seemingly
Uh and the ones who had a seemingly fleeting glimpse can also glimpse after
fleeting glimpse can also glimpse after glimpse ultimately reach the same
glimpse ultimately reach the same ordinary apparently ordinary uh wisdom.
ordinary apparently ordinary uh wisdom. You know, ordinary
You know, ordinary being without
being without uh without fear, without being
uh without fear, without being optimistic,
optimistic, be being um happy with their with their
be being um happy with their with their life. No, no regrets.
life. No, no regrets. Uh
Uh happy with happy campers, you see. And
happy with happy campers, you see. And uh
so >> but what it's like if you if you had to
>> but what it's like if you if you had to describe sort of the best experience
describe sort of the best experience that people could have a view
that people could have a view how does it feel? Does it feel good?
how does it feel? Does it feel good? Does it feel bad? Does it feel strange?
Does it feel bad? Does it feel strange? You you disappear as a person. How does
You you disappear as a person. How does what is like
what is like it's
it's >> it's it's very hard to describe. Okay.
>> it's it's very hard to describe. Okay. Let's for me it was the [snorts]
Let's for me it was the [snorts] experience of absolute happiness,
experience of absolute happiness, love, splendor,
love, splendor, immortality
uh and before that you see for instance
and before that you see for instance when I was thinking of happiness
when I was thinking of happiness I was thinking always in terms of you
I was thinking always in terms of you know like when when you asked what's
know like when when you asked what's your level of pain from one to from zero
your level of pain from one to from zero to 10. Right? So I was
to 10. Right? So I was when I was thinking of happiness, I was
when I was thinking of happiness, I was thinking, okay, this one is a six, this
thinking, okay, this one is a six, this one is a three, this one is a -4,
one is a three, this one is a -4, right?
right? But the maximum was 10,
But the maximum was 10, right? In other words, 10. The maximum
right? In other words, 10. The maximum happiness was in reference to nine. It
happiness was in reference to nine. It was one notch above nine, right? And two
was one notch above nine, right? And two notch above above eight.
But when I with this experience, it was different. It was infinite. And that's
different. It was infinite. And that's that was a big surprise. It was that was
that was a big surprise. It was that was I call I call it absolute.
I call I call it absolute. >> No conditions. There is nothing above.
>> No conditions. There is nothing above. That's the point. I mean there is
That's the point. I mean there is nothing that could ever be above that. I
nothing that could ever be above that. I mean you can have some drugs and have an
mean you can have some drugs and have an experience an apparent happiness out of
experience an apparent happiness out of the ordinary, right? But
the ordinary, right? But you can always be open that a different
you can always be open that a different drug or something else will create
drug or something else will create something above that. But then the s the
something above that. But then the s the surprising thing for me was there's
surprising thing for me was there's nothing above that one. the absolute
nothing above that one. the absolute quality of love, of happiness, of
quality of love, of happiness, of beauty, of
beauty, of >> Yeah. some people describe it that um
>> Yeah. some people describe it that um it's feels like your your heart has been
it's feels like your your heart has been ripped open and there is just so much
ripped open and there is just so much love, so much emotion that you can't
love, so much emotion that you can't bear it. It's just they start crying
bear it. It's just they start crying because you know the body you know
because you know the body you know reacts to it this this way. So these are
reacts to it this this way. So these are some accounts I heard but I was
some accounts I heard but I was wondering yours seem to be more more you
wondering yours seem to be more more you know intellectual maybe maybe I'm wrong
[laughter] no also feeling you say it was a feeling
no also feeling you say it was a feeling sort of that took over right everything
sort of that took over right everything absolute feeling absolute happiness
absolute feeling absolute happiness fascinating
fascinating >> it was by the way no it was not
>> it was by the way no it was not intellectual at all
intellectual at all >> no
>> no >> no no in this case because what we mean
>> no no in this case because what we mean intellectual in Fact what we mean is
the path that leads to this experience. It likes
that leads to this experience. It likes how do you go to the party? You can take
how do you go to the party? You can take a cap. You take you can take the bus,
a cap. You take you can take the bus, [snorts]
[snorts] you can take a bicycle, right?
you can take a bicycle, right? And
And in this case you can go through
in this case you can go through feelings, you can go through the
feelings, you can go through the external senses through beauty, through
external senses through beauty, through love, through beauty and you can go
love, through beauty and you can go through also through intelligence.
through also through intelligence. This path are open. And [clears throat]
This path are open. And [clears throat] in the case of this experience, it was
it was feelings and and and beauty and perceptions. But then
beauty and perceptions. But then there is the intelligence because this
there is the intelligence because this place is a place of absolute
place is a place of absolute intelligence.
intelligence. It's not separate.
So it's like you become that basically you're taking over it. You're you're
you're taking over it. You're you're becoming that love or whatever that is
becoming that love or whatever that is intelligence.
intelligence. >> What you are not disappears.
>> What you are not disappears. What you are remains.
>> How did you get to that? Through meditation or it came upon you out of
meditation or it came upon you out of the blue?
the blue? >> It come through the desire. Why we
>> It come through the desire. Why we desire that is a mystery. Why we enter
desire that is a mystery. Why we enter the path
the path is a mystery. It's grace in religious
is a mystery. It's grace in religious terms or it's a philosophical
terms or it's a philosophical overwhelming interest.
overwhelming interest. Uh
Uh once we are we have begun there is there
once we are we have begun there is there is no no going back.
is no no going back. Was it difficult for you to come back to
Was it difficult for you to come back to play your character in the play after
play your character in the play after you realize that you are the actor?
you realize that you are the actor? >> Have you not lost the lust for life? You
>> Have you not lost the lust for life? You know, the curiosity for life. Okay, I
know, the curiosity for life. Okay, I understand it. I've seen it all. So, but
understand it. I've seen it all. So, but I have to go back, wake up every
I have to go back, wake up every morning, get the kids to school,
morning, get the kids to school, whatever we're doing.
whatever we're doing. >> Oh, no, no, no. The
>> Oh, no, no, no. The there are things that you used to do,
there are things that you used to do, they don't they don't attract you any
they don't they don't attract you any longer.
Like uh spending time in noisy nightclub,
spending time in noisy nightclub, nightclubs,
you know that that doesn't attract you. There are things in my case that I used
There are things in my case that I used to do to enjoy that I stopped doing
to do to enjoy that I stopped doing because I was following closely my
because I was following closely my teacher and I was for I was skiing
teacher and I was for I was skiing playing tennis doing things like that. I
playing tennis doing things like that. I stopped for a while
stopped for a while but later on I started I restarted that
but later on I started I restarted that you know. So there are things you for a
you know. So there are things you for a while because you need to
while because you need to to devote more time and attention to
to devote more time and attention to this investigation then you you have
this investigation then you you have less time available but at the end it's
less time available but at the end it's your entire life. So you you don't uh
your entire life. So you you don't uh you don't read books. I don't read books
you don't read books. I don't read books about spirituality.
about spirituality. I haven't read that for
I haven't read that for [clears throat] forever. you know, you
[clears throat] forever. you know, you don't do there are things you don't do
don't do there are things you don't do any longer. There are things you you do
any longer. There are things you you do like cooking and running errands, you
like cooking and running errands, you know, and and travelings. So,
or gardening. >> Well, it's good news, which means that
>> Well, it's good news, which means that if we all become enlightened, then we
if we all become enlightened, then we still can enjoy our lives and just
still can enjoy our lives and just things drop out which do not serve us
things drop out which do not serve us for whatever reason anymore. Don't don't
for whatever reason anymore. Don't don't ask yourself whether you are enlightened
ask yourself whether you are enlightened or not because
or not because there is only light and we all are the
there is only light and we all are the same light. There is nobody who gets
same light. There is nobody who gets enlightened. Nobody nobody gets
enlightened. Nobody nobody gets enlightened
enlightened and nothing happens by chance. We had
and nothing happens by chance. We had this conversation.
this conversation. We we life is strange. Nothing happens
We we life is strange. Nothing happens by chance in life. And uh the path of
by chance in life. And uh the path of the big
the big big and satur as they say in Japan
big and satur as they say in Japan is one way it manifests. It's not for
is one way it manifests. It's not for everybody. For most people I would say
everybody. For most people I would say it's more
it's more glimpse after glimpse after glimpse. And
it doesn't m I don't know which which path is the fastest. For instance,
path is the fastest. For instance, everybody has his own path. You have
everybody has his own path. You have yours, I have mine.
yours, I have mine. But there is nobody having a path. These
But there is nobody having a path. These are ways we as this universal
are ways we as this universal consciousness
consciousness uh [clears throat]
uh [clears throat] plays a game of infinity.
plays a game of infinity. We as characters in the play, do we have
We as characters in the play, do we have free will or it's all free will of one
free will or it's all free will of one actor?
actor? >> We have zero freedom.
>> We have zero freedom. >> Zero. Mhm.
>> Zero. Mhm. >> So So we are not really
>> So So we are not really uh as as John Doe the actor as John Doe
uh as as John Doe the actor as John Doe the actor playing King Le
the actor playing King Le then we have the freedom. John Doe can
then we have the freedom. John Doe can change a little bit the way he plays
change a little bit the way he plays etc. John John Do the actor is free but
etc. John John Do the actor is free but King Lear never existed. So King Leer
King Lear never existed. So King Leer has no freedom. Right.
has no freedom. Right. >> I thought I had free will. [laughter]
>> I thought I had free will. [laughter] I'll take Croissol in the morning or
I'll take Croissol in the morning or scrambled eggs.
scrambled eggs. >> Look Natalia the bad news is that
>> Look Natalia the bad news is that you don't have free will.
you don't have free will. The good news is that the one who
The good news is that the one who doesn't have free free will is not you
as a as a separate as a separate uh uh
as a separate uh uh body mind entity.
body mind entity. We have no free will. Everything we do
We have no free will. Everything we do from moment to moment is conditioned by
from moment to moment is conditioned by the past
the past or if you will by the current state of
or if you will by the current state of the universe. They say we are we are
the universe. They say we are we are like a
a whirlpool in the river. We don't have a an
in the river. We don't have a an individual separate existence. Our
individual separate existence. Our individual separate existence and as a
individual separate existence and as a result our freedom is an illusion.
result our freedom is an illusion. It is the way the river move but and
It is the way the river move but and that's where the the metaphor
that's where the the metaphor comes to an end.
comes to an end. We are the river but this river is the
We are the river but this river is the river of freedom. The name of this river
river of freedom. The name of this river is the freedom river. So this river is
is the freedom river. So this river is free. This river is not
free. This river is not a constraint between two banks. No, this
a constraint between two banks. No, this river is freedom itself. So bad news
river is freedom itself. So bad news as a separate and as a separate body
as a separate and as a separate body mind we believe to be we are conditioned
mind we believe to be we are conditioned we have no freedom. Good news we are not
we have no freedom. Good news we are not this body mind. It appears in us and we
this body mind. It appears in us and we are already
are already this universal consciousness which is
this universal consciousness which is hearing my words right now
hearing my words right now >> and which is inherently free [laughter]
>> and which is inherently free [laughter] as free as it can be.
as free as it can be. >> Inherently free. There is no it has
>> Inherently free. There is no it has always been free. It is not affected. It
always been free. It is not affected. It is free in two ways. [snorts] It is free
is free in two ways. [snorts] It is free from because whatever it perceives
from because whatever it perceives doesn't affect it. You see just as the
doesn't affect it. You see just as the the images reflected in the mirror
the images reflected in the mirror doesn't stain or damage the mirror. So
doesn't stain or damage the mirror. So consciousness is free from all the
consciousness is free from all the perceptions but [snorts] in addition it
perceptions but [snorts] in addition it is free to create everything that we
is free to create everything that we perceive is our own creation as
perceive is our own creation as consciousness. Once we are open to this
consciousness. Once we are open to this possibility
possibility and [clears throat]
and [clears throat] we check it out it becomes a reality of
we check it out it becomes a reality of our experience. But it it requires the
our experience. But it it requires the courage
courage to check it out.
to check it out. >> Is God for you the same as this
>> Is God for you the same as this universal consciousness or is it
universal consciousness or is it something else?
something else? >> Yes. Yes. Yes.
>> Yes. Yes. Yes. >> The same.
>> The same. >> God God for me has
>> God God for me has nothing personal. See uh it's not a
nothing personal. See uh it's not a human person.
human person. The what we in fact [clears throat] what
The what we in fact [clears throat] what we define in a human human being as as
we define in a human human being as as its human quality a lot of compassion,
its human quality a lot of compassion, love, intelligence, you know, the
love, intelligence, you know, the intelligence of the heart, all of that
intelligence of the heart, all of that sense of beauty, sensitivity.
sense of beauty, sensitivity. In fact,
In fact, these qualities are divine qualities in
these qualities are divine qualities in us. You know, they don't belong to the
us. You know, they don't belong to the human body. We attribute them to the
human body. We attribute them to the body. But no, they transcend the body.
body. But no, they transcend the body. They belong to consciousness.
They belong to consciousness. They are if you will uh lumininal
They are if you will uh lumininal qualities.
qualities. Phenomenal qualities are like weight,
Phenomenal qualities are like weight, extension in time, and space, color,
extension in time, and space, color, vibration, you know, everything that can
vibration, you know, everything that can that is really phenomenal.
that is really phenomenal. But law of sensitivity, aesthetic sense,
But law of sensitivity, aesthetic sense, uh compassion,
uh compassion, the ability to understand
the ability to understand how another person feels. For instance,
how another person feels. For instance, that that comes from a different place.
that that comes from a different place. You know it's because if you think when
You know it's because if you think when we interact as human being
we interact as human being [clears throat]
[clears throat] our words
our words our words trans transfer information
our words trans transfer information right
right but the words are different from the
but the words are different from the meaning
meaning you see as I speak you understand the
you see as I speak you understand the meaning of my words [snorts]
meaning of my words [snorts] it's is something different the place of
it's is something different the place of meaning is the place of consciousness.
meaning is the place of consciousness. The your ears, your brain processes the
The your ears, your brain processes the data, you know, isolates the words, puts
data, you know, isolates the words, puts them together, correlates with your
them together, correlates with your memories, etc. does like a computer data
memories, etc. does like a computer data processing. But at the end of the at the
processing. But at the end of the at the end of the line, the meaning, the
end of the line, the meaning, the understanding, that's a place of
understanding, that's a place of consciousness. And that's what we we
consciousness. And that's what we we enjoy communicating, you know, among
enjoy communicating, you know, among human beings because it takes us back to
human beings because it takes us back to this place. It's mysterious. The fact
this place. It's mysterious. The fact the the the physicist
the the the physicist shinger shinger one of his books
shinger shinger one of his books he has a question
he has a question how is it possible that we communicate
how is it possible that we communicate at all? He means communicate meaning
at all? He means communicate meaning because it's not obvious because
because it's not obvious because [clears throat] through physics [snorts]
[clears throat] through physics [snorts] we have a very good model how we
we have a very good model how we communicate information
communicate information right we have what is called unitary
right we have what is called unitary processes in physics the unitarity the
processes in physics the unitarity the kind of conservation of information
but information is very different from
information is very different from meaning. Meaning is not about phys.
meaning. Meaning is not about phys. Physics cannot account for meaning. Only
Physics cannot account for meaning. Only consciousness can.
I always wanted to ask this question. Do you think mathematics and music exist
Do you think mathematics and music exist independently and objectively from us or
independently and objectively from us or they exist because we exist?
they exist because we exist? Or I
Or I you see everything exists independently
you see everything exists independently from us as human beings. Let's put it
from us as human beings. Let's put it this way.
this way. Nothing
Nothing exists independently from us as
exists independently from us as consciousness. Now if you ask me
consciousness. Now if you ask me specifically of mathematics and it's a
specifically of mathematics and it's a conversation
conversation I I had some time to a friend of mine
I I had some time to a friend of mine who is a mathematician Edward Frankle
and there is this thing that
there is this thing that young Carl Young called the the the
young Carl Young called the the the world of archetypes you know the
world of archetypes you know the unconscious
unconscious >> [clears throat]
>> And there are archetypes like that that are common to the human psyche,
that are common to the human psyche, right? [clears throat]
right? [clears throat] They are kind of mysterious.
They are kind of mysterious. I had this lady, a friend of mine,
I had this lady, a friend of mine, she had a heart attack. She went to the
she had a heart attack. She went to the hospital and they gave her a lot of
hospital and they gave her a lot of morphine and she was very concerned. She
morphine and she was very concerned. She was in pain
was in pain and she told me that she was interested
and she told me that she was interested in spiritual matters
in spiritual matters that in this half dream half awakened
that in this half dream half awakened state she was in
state she was in at some point she had the image
at some point she had the image of a serpent of a snake biting its own
of a serpent of a snake biting its own tail.
tail. And then all became clear and that her
And then all became clear and that her fear and her concern vanished as seeing
fear and her concern vanished as seeing this and this uh
this symbolic circle right but with a snake eating is is you find that in many
snake eating is is you find that in many in different tradition it's part of the
in different tradition it's part of the of the unconscious. So yes, there are
of the unconscious. So yes, there are realms
realms where there are forms such as the form
where there are forms such as the form of the serpent, you know, uh which are
of the serpent, you know, uh which are independent from any specific human
independent from any specific human being. We we have not been taught about
being. We we have not been taught about it, you know, it's it's there. we we
it, you know, it's it's there. we we kind of
kind of and but what is interesting and that's
and but what is interesting and that's what
what we talk often with Edward uh
we talk often with Edward uh as mathematicians we we know we we we
as mathematicians we we know we we we have this deep intuition that when we
have this deep intuition that when we discover something
discover something it was already there
it was already there it's not something that we just create
it's not something that we just create that which gets created creat created is
that which gets created creat created is the proof but we
the proof but we through our creativity we didn't know
through our creativity we didn't know how to prove this okay now now I I prove
how to prove this okay now now I I prove it but that which we have proven this
it but that which we have proven this mathematical reality that we prove
mathematical reality that we prove existed independently from us you know
existed independently from us you know if we discover a new property of the
if we discover a new property of the prime numbers
prime numbers uh if we dis it existed before we
uh if we dis it existed before we discovered it
discovered it so and and and and so and and so but
so and and and and so and and so but what is beautiful about mathematics is
what is beautiful about mathematics is that
that there are lots of mathematical ideas
there are lots of mathematical ideas and they are all belong to this to this
and they are all belong to this to this realm and what is interesting about this
realm and what is interesting about this realm of mathematical ideas is that
realm of mathematical ideas is that there is no time elapsing there.
there is no time elapsing there. You see the number pi uh sorry the
You see the number pi uh sorry the number pi or the number e
number pi or the number e they don't evolve in time.
they don't evolve in time. pi is not a function of t and e is not a
pi is not a function of t and e is not a function of e. The number pi is always
function of e. The number pi is always three.14.
Yeah. And it doesn't evolve. You see? And
And what is a
what is a what is a tensor? What is
an open set? What is a a continuous function? What is an integral? All of
function? What is an integral? All of that partial derivative. All of that
that partial derivative. All of that is out there. Or prime number or the
is out there. Or prime number or the or the remain conjecture. All of that is
or the remain conjecture. All of that is already there.
already there. Even if it has not been proven yet per
Even if it has not been proven yet per it will be proven at some point
it will be proven at some point hopefully.
hopefully. >> So we discover math at least the
>> So we discover math at least the >> a new territory just as discovering
>> a new territory just as discovering Mars. So
Mars. So >> and must be objective existence then
>> and must be objective existence then that's the only conclusion I get.
that's the only conclusion I get. >> Yeah. And also because there is this uh
>> Yeah. And also because there is this uh uncanny connection also between math and
uncanny connection also between math and the world.
We start from the world. We see a we see a circle, right? But the circle we see
a circle, right? But the circle we see in the world is never perfect, right?
in the world is never perfect, right? It's always limited.
It's always limited. But then from there
But then from there we move to the notion of
we move to the notion of a plane,
a plane, a point which is the center, a set of
a point which is the center, a set of point and the set of point which has on
point and the set of point which has on the plane at the same distance of
the plane at the same distance of another point called center that is the
another point called center that is the perfect circle. Right? Then we we
perfect circle. Right? Then we we measure the
measure the we find a way to me measure the
we find a way to me measure the circumference
circumference from the diameter
from the diameter using the number pi. So the number pi
using the number pi. So the number pi gets defined right now. But then in a
gets defined right now. But then in a totally different branch of mathematics,
totally different branch of mathematics, we take one series like the sum of 1 + 1
we take one series like the sum of 1 + 1 / 2² + 1 / 3 squared etc etc.
/ 2² + 1 / 3 squared etc etc. If you add that up to infinity
If you add that up to infinity we find something which relates to pi.
we find something which relates to pi. So we find pi there from a totally uh
So we find pi there from a totally uh different direction. If we if we
different direction. If we if we calculate the integral from infinity to
calculate the integral from infinity to plus infinity of exponential minus x²
plus infinity of exponential minus x² also we find something that relates to
also we find something that relates to pi. I don't remember what it was. It's
pi. I don't remember what it was. It's like
like but I know there is pi or pi square in
but I know there is pi or pi square in it. So, so different approach and then
it. So, so different approach and then we are in a realm which is purely
we are in a realm which is purely conceptual, purely conceptual.
conceptual, purely conceptual. But then we go back to physics [snorts]
But then we go back to physics [snorts] and or then we go there and we
we go to the complex numbers. We move from the real
complex numbers. We move from the real numbers
numbers and we use this number square root of
and we use this number square root of minus1
minus1 I and the and and the complex number and
I and the and and the complex number and then also pi
then also pi mysteriously appears there also the same
mysteriously appears there also the same number pi and we have the exponential of
number pi and we have the exponential of i pi equals minus1 right this famous
i pi equals minus1 right this famous beautiful formula but then we move to
beautiful formula but then we move to physics modern physics quantum physics
physics modern physics quantum physics physics and these complex numbers and
physics and these complex numbers and the pi appears everywhere in all all the
the pi appears everywhere in all all the formulas you know it's it's everywhere
formulas you know it's it's everywhere and
this some mathemat mathematical theory like hilbert spaces and
like hilbert spaces and uh her mission operators unitary
uh her mission operators unitary operators they they come and they they
operators they they come and they they are used as tools to describe to
are used as tools to describe to describe reality. And with a highly with
describe reality. And with a highly with a great predictive power, we can
a great predictive power, we can we can
we can predict the value of some
predict the value of some some constants
some constants with I don't know how many decimals I
with I don't know how many decimals I forgot but nine decimals.
forgot but nine decimals. Uh
Uh so it's it's really [snorts]
so it's it's really [snorts] extraordinary and what that tells me is
extraordinary and what that tells me is this connection between the matter
this connection between the matter reality which is measured by physics and
reality which is measured by physics and the other aspect the mind aspect which
the other aspect the mind aspect which is more connected to consciousness right
is more connected to consciousness right the physics is connected to reality and
the physics is connected to reality and the math is connected to consciousness
the math is connected to consciousness [snorts]
[snorts] but how to [clears throat] explain that
but how to [clears throat] explain that the math is connected to reality to to
the math is connected to reality to to to physics.
to physics. It's because reality at its highest
It's because reality at its highest level is connected to consciousness and
level is connected to consciousness and they are one. So that's for me what I
they are one. So that's for me what I take from this u uncanny
take from this u uncanny efficiency of mathematics
efficiency of mathematics uh in physics.
uh in physics. It's it's remarkable. So you have a a
It's it's remarkable. So you have a a very good example is Dra Dra's equation
very good example is Dra Dra's equation uh uh Dak's equation is the equation
uh uh Dak's equation is the equation that in the
that in the modern physics uh describes
modern physics uh describes uh electrons
uh electrons and particles with spin 1/2 fmians
and particles with spin 1/2 fmians and the way he went about it. He he had
and the way he went about it. He he had this he started from another equation
this he started from another equation called Klein Gordon equation that was a
called Klein Gordon equation that was a quadratic equation
quadratic equation and he says well uh it would be nice to
and he says well uh it would be nice to have a linear equation so I could factor
have a linear equation so I could factor this quadratic equation in two fact if I
this quadratic equation in two fact if I could do this but
could do this but he had a
he had a moment of genius by he couldn't do this
moment of genius by he couldn't do this in a
in a with a scalar field. He needed a vector
with a scalar field. He needed a vector field to to do it and
field to to do it and he needed a vector field with four
he needed a vector field with four components at the time. So he realized
components at the time. So he realized it that was purely a mathematical
it that was purely a mathematical genius. He puts matrices, we call them
genius. He puts matrices, we call them direct matrices in the equation, factors
direct matrices in the equation, factors this and comes up with an equation.
this and comes up with an equation. This equation does two things. Number
This equation does two things. Number one, it describes the spin which is an
one, it describes the spin which is an intrinsic property of the electron.
intrinsic property of the electron. It describes a spin. That's the first
It describes a spin. That's the first thing. But it does something more.
thing. But it does something more. There are solutions with positive energy
There are solutions with positive energy and there are solutions with negative
and there are solutions with negative energy and the negative energy solution
energy and the negative energy solution correspond to antimatter correspond to
correspond to antimatter correspond to the positron
the positron and a few years after the after direct
and a few years after the after direct uh creating the posit
uh creating the posit [clears throat]
direct formulating the hypothesis of a particle that would have the same mass
particle that would have the same mass spin. in as the electron but a negative
spin. in as the electron but a negative charge, a positive charge instead of the
charge, a positive charge instead of the electron.
electron. Two or three years after the posetron
Two or three years after the posetron was actually discovered
was actually discovered in the world, right? Antimatter that was
in the world, right? Antimatter that was the the beginning. But all of that from
the the beginning. But all of that from the beauty of the mathematics
the beauty of the mathematics and an elegant solution an elegant and
and an elegant solution an elegant and very creative very intelligent
very creative very intelligent discovery.
discovery. So this connection between consciousness
So this connection between consciousness and reality of the world between
and reality of the world between consciousness and the world
consciousness and the world between math and [snorts] physics.
between math and [snorts] physics. >> Interesting.
>> Interesting. You could be teaching mathematics and
You could be teaching mathematics and physics next to adant.
physics next to adant. >> I've done I've done that at some point
>> I've done I've done that at some point in my
in my >> All right. I could tell [laughter] you
>> All right. I could tell [laughter] you explain very well because math is not my
explain very well because math is not my strong point. I mean music is but math
strong point. I mean music is but math to be honest. I
to be honest. I >> the same with music. Music is also music
>> the same with music. Music is also music is it's a different story but the music
is it's a different story but the music is Jean Klein used to say the music is
is Jean Klein used to say the music is at the end of the piece.
at the end of the piece. What does he mean by that?
What does he mean by that? >> When everything comes together,
>> When everything comes together, the music keeps us waiting for the
the music keeps us waiting for the resolution, right? We we are we have
resolution, right? We we are we have this thing up. We have a dissonance and
this thing up. We have a dissonance and then we wait, you know, we have the
then we wait, you know, we have the >> Yeah, I know what you mean. G come
>> Yeah, I know what you mean. G come resolution most of the times unless
resolution most of the times unless you're playing [laughter]
you're playing [laughter] >> Yeah. Yeah. But but on the on the other
>> Yeah. Yeah. But but on the on the other hand, if you if you if you always had
hand, if you if you if you always had perfect perfect chords, it's boring. So
perfect perfect chords, it's boring. So you need a little excitement, right? You
you need a little excitement, right? You need a little dissonance and then we
need a little dissonance and then we save it, right? And and and so there are
save it, right? And and and so there are these little cadences in the in the
these little cadences in the in the piece constantly and then there are more
piece constantly and then there are more overarching
overarching stories in which we reach a resolution.
stories in which we reach a resolution. We have the first scene for instance in
We have the first scene for instance in a sonata form type of piece. We have the
a sonata form type of piece. We have the first scene, then we have a bridge, then
first scene, then we have a bridge, then we have the second scene that I expose,
we have the second scene that I expose, then we have the development, then they
then we have the development, then they play together, right? And then we have a
play together, right? And then we have a conclusion, right? And and but all of
conclusion, right? And and but all of that there is a beginning and end, a
that there is a beginning and end, a beginning and end. There is a tension
beginning and end. There is a tension and a resolution. A tension and the
and a resolution. A tension and the resolution. The great conductor, I don't
resolution. The great conductor, I don't know whether you like him. I love him.
and and and he was giving a master class and he he
he was giving a master class and he he he said what in music really
he said what in music really there are no dynamics for piano and
there are no dynamics for piano and forte forget about it there is tension
forte forget about it there is tension and release tension and release that's
and release tension and release that's what music is and because
what music is and because going to the point as we release we
going to the point as we release we [snorts] go back to our true nature you
[snorts] go back to our true nature you see
see the release of the tension. It's like
the release of the tension. It's like the release of a desire. At the end of
the release of a desire. At the end of the desire, the desire is satisfied.
the desire, the desire is satisfied. We go to our we go to this place of of
We go to our we go to this place of of and and so the music it's some kind of
and and so the music it's some kind of you are addicted, you know, to to this
you are addicted, you know, to to this tension and releasing, you know, you
tension and releasing, you know, you play this game and and you you enjoy it.
play this game and and you you enjoy it. It's a it's a celebration.
It's a it's a celebration. >> I repeat myself. Unless you play Sati,
>> I repeat myself. Unless you play Sati, Eric, Sati [laughter]
And then it's beginning at the end it's all tension. [laughter]
all tension. [laughter] >> He's not too bad. So you you play the
>> He's not too bad. So you you play the piano.
piano. >> Yeah, I play piano.
>> Yeah, I play piano. >> Yes. So So yeah, but but look, you know,
>> Yes. So So yeah, but but look, you know, I like simple piece on the piano. I like
I like simple piece on the piano. I like I like the Schubert. I like all of all
I like the Schubert. I like all of all of Shopan, you know. I like Mozart
of Shopan, you know. I like Mozart conertos, of course. I like Beethoven
conertos, of course. I like Beethoven sonatas and
sonatas and >> plain I love Bach. I mean although my my
>> plain I love Bach. I mean although my my my latest is just the the whole the
my latest is just the the whole the whole polyhony it just does something to
whole polyhony it just does something to my [laughter] brain you know I just
my [laughter] brain you know I just >> I don't know what it is but you come so
>> I don't know what it is but you come so filled with something after that because
filled with something after that because so rich it is although recently I'm
so rich it is although recently I'm playing
playing now
now >> bar is god is always present in bar it's
>> bar is god is always present in bar it's it's always
it's always kind of the perfection in the in the
kind of the perfection in the in the prelude it's like
prelude it's like >> tative
>> tative trying to find the key note, right? And
trying to find the key note, right? And then you have the keynote and boom, the
then you have the keynote and boom, the fuel.
fuel. >> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yes.
>> Yes. >> It's fabulous. Fabulous. I have
>> It's fabulous. Fabulous. I have important questions to ask you before
important questions to ask you before otherwise I'll keep you too long and I
otherwise I'll keep you too long and I promise not to. Um, [snorts]
people are always interested how can we explain the anomalous phenomena such as
explain the anomalous phenomena such as precognition, out of body experiences,
precognition, out of body experiences, premonitions, apparitions like ghosts
premonitions, apparitions like ghosts and UFOs, mediumship, interactions with
and UFOs, mediumship, interactions with diseased relatives and friends, you name
diseased relatives and friends, you name it, there's a whole list. Is there a way
it, there's a whole list. Is there a way that advanc
that advanc can explain or does it offer an
can explain or does it offer an explanation? When they happen they are
explanation? When they happen they are kind of confirmation for me of the
kind of confirmation for me of the oneness
oneness of the of the of of nonduality that
of the of the of of nonduality that there is only one reality and that
there is only one reality and that consciousness is this reality that there
consciousness is this reality that there are confirmation of that and there in if
are confirmation of that and there in if I take that in a religious term there
I take that in a religious term there are smiles there are gods smiling at us
are smiles there are gods smiling at us [snorts] there are smiles of God but I'm
[snorts] there are smiles of God but I'm not interest in this sense that I'm not
not interest in this sense that I'm not going to seek to own them. I'm not going
going to seek to own them. I'm not going to move the little finger to to try to
to move the little finger to to try to acquire any of these
acquire any of these features. And so they don't
features. And so they don't they don't excite me in this sense of
they don't excite me in this sense of doing research in them, but but they
doing research in them, but but they truly exist. I myself I have I've I've
truly exist. I myself I have I've I've experienced that and in no uncertain
experienced that and in no uncertain terms,
terms, you see. Uh for instance, I had this
you see. Uh for instance, I had this friend in France.
friend in France. Uh we used to he was in Tusen and he
Uh we used to he was in Tusen and he used to come to my place in the evening.
used to come to my place in the evening. He was a very nice
He was a very nice man. So we would talk about the truth,
man. So we would talk about the truth, meditate, etc. Okay. Several years
meditate, etc. Okay. Several years later, I moved to America.
later, I moved to America. He lived in Bordeaux, France. And uh I
He lived in Bordeaux, France. And uh I was in America. I was in France for a
was in America. I was in France for a few days and I happened to be in
few days and I happened to be in Bordeaux. I called him. His wife tell,
Bordeaux. I called him. His wife tell, "Oh, Francis, he would be very happy to
"Oh, Francis, he would be very happy to see you." Unfortunately,
see you." Unfortunately, he is on a trip. He went took a vacation
he is on a trip. He went took a vacation in the Alps to go fishing. So, the Alps
in the Alps to go fishing. So, the Alps is the other way of France. I say,
is the other way of France. I say, "Okay, uh, sorry, I'm here only for one
"Okay, uh, sorry, I'm here only for one day or two." So I gave up seeing him and
day or two." So I gave up seeing him and then I moved to the to my hometown with
then I moved to the to my hometown with my parents and two days later I'm there
my parents and two days later I'm there and I'm with another person and I I am
and I'm with another person and I I am in the city. I decide to show this
in the city. I decide to show this person the cathedral. So we go to the
person the cathedral. So we go to the cathedral. We enter the cathedral which
cathedral. We enter the cathedral which is old historic building and we move on
is old historic building and we move on the central a and when we reach the
the central a and when we reach the center of the of the cross you know the
center of the of the cross you know the cathedral the lateral door opens
cathedral the lateral door opens [snorts] and in the twilight a person
[snorts] and in the twilight a person enters
enters and starts moving and as it comes close
and starts moving and as it comes close it looks familiar to me. So I start
it looks familiar to me. So I start moving to this period to was this person
moving to this period to was this person and as comes close we recognize each
and as comes close we recognize each other and we are completely
other and we are completely stupified because it was not his his
stupified because it was not his his place. I thought he was in the ark. So
place. I thought he was in the ark. So the story from his side was he was
the story from his side was he was g get driving back home by train. His
g get driving back home by train. His train had some mechanical failure and he
train had some mechanical failure and he found himself stranded in the station of
found himself stranded in the station of my hometown. So for six hours. So he's
my hometown. So for six hours. So he's there waiting for the next train to go
there waiting for the next train to go to Bordo. He's there for 6 hours. He say
to Bordo. He's there for 6 hours. He say what do I'm going to take a walk in the
what do I'm going to take a walk in the town. He he had never been in this town.
town. He he had never been in this town. And then then and then he sees
And then then and then he sees cathedral. He said okay let's go to the
cathedral. He said okay let's go to the cathedral.
cathedral. But he entered the cathedral one minute
But he entered the cathedral one minute after me. So these two spiritual friends
after me. So these two spiritual friends life chose to meet them. I had this
life chose to meet them. I had this desire to meet him, you know, two days
desire to meet him, you know, two days before
before in the most spiritual place in the city,
in the most spiritual place in the city, you know, also the highest place, you
you know, also the highest place, you know, symbolically, you know, to reunite
know, symbolically, you know, to reunite us there, you know, to tell us, you
us there, you know, to tell us, you know, life is something else than what
know, life is something else than what what most people think, you know. So
what most people think, you know. So yes, I'm open to to Miracle. I know. I
yes, I'm open to to Miracle. I know. I know
know >> you really wanted to meet him. I think
>> you really wanted to meet him. I think [laughter]
and and and life obliged. [laughter]
[laughter] >> Yeah. But from point of view of like if
>> Yeah. But from point of view of like if we have like um a point of view of of
we have like um a point of view of of this consciousness, right? So somehow
this consciousness, right? So somehow our boundaries are not so
our boundaries are not so so sort of transparent now and then,
so sort of transparent now and then, right? If we are getting all sorts of,
right? If we are getting all sorts of, you know, strange appearances,
you know, strange appearances, channeling,
channeling, you know, kind of stuff, angels, you
you know, kind of stuff, angels, you name it. I mean, there's a whole list of
name it. I mean, there's a whole list of these operations,
these operations, >> many many things. But, you know, I I
>> many many things. But, you know, I I speak only from what I can experience,
speak only from what I can experience, right? And uh and mostly of what I
right? And uh and mostly of what I experience in the moment, except not
experience in the moment, except not very much of my past experience. That
very much of my past experience. That was an exception, this one. But um
because who cares about my past experience? You know what is important
experience? You know what is important is what we both can experience in the
is what we both can experience in the moment. You know that we that we can
moment. You know that we that we can really share.
really share. >> What happens after we die? Do you
>> What happens after we die? Do you believe in reincarnation or the embodied
believe in reincarnation or the embodied life is a one-way ticket?
life is a one-way ticket? >> If we ask this question, we first ask to
>> If we ask this question, we first ask to whom? To whom or to what? What happens
whom? To whom or to what? What happens to the physical body?
to the physical body? We know what happens.
We know what happens. What happens to consciousness? Nothing
What happens to consciousness? Nothing happens to consciousness. Consciousness
happens to consciousness. Consciousness remains this beautiful, happy uh uh
remains this beautiful, happy uh uh extraordinary
extraordinary thing. So we remain the same. What
thing. So we remain the same. What happened to the mind? We can
happened to the mind? We can consciousness can recreate whatever it
consciousness can recreate whatever it wants to recreate.
wants to recreate. Okay, next question.
Okay, next question. >> What is the most important advice would
>> What is the most important advice would you give to people who are on the path
you give to people who are on the path of truth seeking
of truth seeking about the nature of reality? That's what
about the nature of reality? That's what we mean.
we mean. >> Keep seeking. Keep seeking who you are.
>> Keep seeking. Keep seeking who you are. Keep seeking. I have to go.
Keep seeking. I have to go. >> Francis, thank you very much for your
>> Francis, thank you very much for your time and for this interview and for
time and for this interview and for sharing your stories. We totally
sharing your stories. We totally appreciate it. [music] Thanks a lot.
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.