YouTube Transcript:
How Theology School Turned Me Into an Atheist
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Available languages:
View:
Why does theology school create atheists
like me? Hi, I'm Britt Hartley here at
Nonsense Spirituality. I'm an atheist
spiritual director and I thought I'd
share my story of how I lost my faith in
theology school, but I also want to talk
about the broader experience of why
seminary or theological school um is
essentially like an atheist making
machine. So, first of all, just just my
story real briefly. I if you've been
following me for any amount of time, I
was raised Mormon. I lost faith in like
the literal belief that Mormonism is
like the one true religion. By the time
I was a teenager, I was doing what you
would call like nuanced Mormonism. Like
uh kind of the sense that maybe
Mormonism isn't the one true religion,
but this is just like one one pathway to
God, I think, is kind of how I was doing
it. Uh because I'm a teenager and I'm
trying to reconcile with my family
because I got kicked out of my home. Uh
but eventually, you know, in in early
adulthood, I lost faith in Mormonism
entirely. And as any Christian will tell
you, like that's great. Like you lost
faith in that religion because that
religion is crazy and you had the wrong
Jesus. You had the wrong God. So I'm
like, fantastic. I'll go to theology
school and learn about real Christianity
because apparently I just had the wrong
religion. So I took this very seriously.
I I've always um since I was a child
like asked deep questions and I always
figured like if there is a God and there
is a right and there is a wrong and
there is a specific holy book that's
that's you know more guided by God than
others. This is the most important thing
to know. And I thought about it all the
time like I I always was a person who
was asking those questions. So this
wasn't just like a fun hobby horse for
me. um this was like my this was the
driving question of my entire life which
is like what is and if there's a god um
then that's a really important thing to
know. So I go to uh Northwind
Theological Seminary and I'm studying
theology and as you study theology
you're you're learning more and more
complexities about the Bible. You're
learning how to nuance things. You're
learning um mysticism. You're learning
like Richard Roar. you're learning how
to work with these um concepts in order
to make sense of things, but it gets
increasingly complex as you as you go
through school. And so what ended up
happening to me is I had this seed of
doubt, I guess you would say, where as
you're studying the Bible, you start
seeing how God changes based on how that
society changes. So an easy example is
like the concept of hell. In the Old
Testament, we don't really have a
concept of hell. We don't have moral
distinctions in the afterlife. Um
because justice and and blessings and
condemnations happen in this life. Like
God's going to take care of it in in
this life and then they get conquered
and it's like the bad guys win. So the
theology changes and now we have
blessings in the next life because you
didn't get the blessings you were
promised by being a part of the covenant
people. You didn't get it in this life.
And so then we start to see moral
distinctions in the afterlife. That's
just one tiny thing. And then you start
to read thousands of these things where
something there's some kind of change
with the society and then all of a
sudden the God changes. And what
happened to me is I I got so good at
that not just in Christianity but as I'm
studying other religions too that I got
to the point where you could give me a
society tell me how their agriculture
works. Tell me um you know how the
social hierarchy works. Tell me about
how often the flooding is. Tell me about
the weather. And if you tell me all
those things, this is more of like the
cognitive science of religion or, you
know, anthropology.
And if you give me all those things,
I'll be able to tell you what kind of
god they created. And I started getting
so good at that game that I was always
right. And I could now predict, okay, if
this happens, this change in this
society happens or uh you could just
give me a people and tell me how it
works and I'll tell you kind of what god
they have. Um and that beca be became
something that I got very good at. And
then further than that, you also get to
see how individuals
um what kinds of individuals create what
kinds of gods. And so certain
personality types will create different
kinds of gods. If you are really high in
moral uh disgust, if like disgust is
something that you feel very strongly in
your body, you're going to have a god
that has the same kind of moral disgust
that you do. Uh if you're autistic, you
tend to be either fundamentalist or you
tend to be atheist, but not so much in
between. Um if you have high uh levels
of empathy, you're going to read Jesus
as someone different than someone who
reads Jesus who has high core values of
loyalty. um or even authority. And so
you get so good at that that I started I
had this thought that that this was like
the thread that started to pull the
whole thing apart of what if we're the
ones that create gods rather than God
creating us because I got so good at
that game of knowing how individuals and
societies create gods and why they do
like the the psychology and sociology
behind that. So, uh, again, like the
first move that you would make with
that, which everyone makes when they
have this thought, is okay, maybe we're
all accessing God in our different ways.
Um, and this is like one of the stops on
deconstruction that I feel like
everybody goes to. What if this is all
like facets of the same diamond or like,
you know, as a parent, my kids bring out
different sides of me? Maybe I'm more
playful with one kid because that's what
they need from me. uh but I'm more, you
know, snuggly with another one because
that's what they need from me, right?
And so eventually you go into this like
interfaith place where yes, it seems
like we're there's a lot of human stuff
going on with this God game that we're
playing, but that doesn't mean that
there's not a God. It just means that,
you know, we're accessing God um through
our, you know, human biases and through
our filters and we see through a glass
darkly, right? Right. And so that
sustained my faith for for a while. And
I see a lot of people end up there uh
too where they maybe lose faith in like
the God of the Bible, but they still
would believe in something like a higher
power that we're all accessing through
these different religions. And then that
started to also break down for me too
because once I um had essentially the
courage to say, okay, what would it look
like if religion and God was a human
project? and I put those lenses on,
things started to make more and more
sense. So, when I started to look at,
for example, like near-death experiences
from a more secular viewpoint at what's
going on at the level of the brain, it
started to make more sense. When you
start to look at religion as what
societies do be, you know, because we
co-evolve with religion, it gives us a
lot of things that we need
psychologically and socially, and it
helps us with our existential fears. it
started to make more sense when you
start looking at claims of the
supernatural when you start looking at
um holy books if you put on the lens of
okay let's just look at this you know
maybe I'm not convinced I'm just going
to try this on because my my thing my
thing was always like if there is a
truth it can withstand the questions of
my you know small tiny human brain and
so I just started to put on the lens of
like what what if humans were doing this
what would it look you know what would
this look like and across the board it
just started to make more sense so an
example of this is like most people
today even Christians when someone has
schizophrenia they don't say this person
has demons and has been taken over by
demons and needs and exorcism that still
happens it's much more rare most people
today will say you know what that person
has schizophrenia this is this is a
mental health disorder that needs to be
dealt with at the at the level of the
brain with the the whatever current
science that we have on schizophrenia
and that's a you know when you look at
the two and compare is it schizophrenia
or is it demons it becomes a lot more
clear okay I think we have some more
information here I think schizophrenia
better explains what's happening with
this person than some supernatural
explanation right that's an easy example
I think most people are on board with
but then I started to do that with
everything like literally everything
when it comes comes to God and spiritual
experience and awe and transcendence and
uh people seeing God on mushrooms and
near-death experiences and dreams and
and scripture and holy text and how you
feel when you sing. And I started to
look at that and say, is there a better
explanation when you're looking at this
from the side of this is a human
project? And the answer was yes. And I
didn't want that answer. That's what I
really want other people to know is that
is that a lot of people see my content
now and they'll say she wants to prove,
you know, I want to sin. I want to prove
that God isn't real and I because I'm
prideful, because I'm just this atheist.
Like you have to realize that I was
trying these ideas on because I'm a
truth seeker and I believed that that
the truth uh mattered and that the truth
could stand up to scrutiny. And but I
didn't want these answers. I I I really
didn't want these answers. This is not
what I was looking for. I was teaching
seminary. I was teaching teenagers from
the Bible. I was um you know in a
marriage where uh you know my husband
was a believer. I was raising my child
at the time in church and I everything
in my life was built on which is common
for people who go into theology school.
Everything in my life was built on the
idea of faith. Not just like you know my
friends and my family and my community
but my identity and my uh sense of
purpose and my sense of morality and my
sense of meaning and how I make
decisions and just literally every
aspect of my life was built on there
being a god. Um, so I didn't like any of
these answers. And when it got time for
me to write my dissertation,
I as I was thinking about what to write
my dissertation about, I had got to to
gotten to the point where I had to be
honest with myself that I no longer
believe in God. I once you put on that
lens to see is there a better way to
explain this from the point of view of
of secularism or or this being a human
project, does it make more s sense? And
the answer was yes.
So I never did write my dissertation.
Maybe one day I'll go go back and write something
something
something. Uh I don't I don't see even
now I don't even know what I would
write. Um maybe I'll go back at some
point and and write something just so I
can uh finish the thing. But I never
wrote that dissertation and I dropped
out of theology school and you know had
had nothing at the time and had to
rebuild which I've talked about in other
episodes. And so uh I learned that this
is a very common experience that I'm not
the only person who went in the went
into theology to be able to find God or
get closer to God and then ends up
losing God in the process. It's actually
a very very common thing that happens to
the point now that churches are starting
to try to make their own kind of higher
education because they know if they send
these these kids to theology school that
uh half of them they're never going to
see again because they're going to lose
their faith in the process. So now I
want to talk about why it is that way.
um you know not just my story but now
kind of the broader story of what's
going on in theology school in America
and what is the data that we have on
that and then kind of where that leads
us and I also want to talk about kind of
the big secret of a as someone who's
been in that circle there was like this
Tik Tok that went viral that asked
what's something that's common in your
field that everybody knows but the
general population doesn't know and so I
do want to give some of those like
insider perspectives
at some point. But let's start with the
data that we do have on theology school
in general. So the the big study that
people cite a lot is the Daniel Dennett
study uh called preachers who are not
believers which was in 2013. And this is
this qualitative um research is is one
of the most cited studies in this area.
They interviewed Protestant clergy who
had lost their belief in God and usually
it was during seminary and a lot of them
continued to work in ministry roles and
so many reported that seminary was the
turning point in their deconversion and
aspects of that was like exposure to
higher criticism, understanding biblical
authorship that you know the people
writing these books are not people who
were just like walking around with Jesus
taking notes. you know, these were
stories that were uh passed around
campfires for decades and then someone
wrote them down and that starts to all
break down and then you get into the
biblical contradictions and you get to
the mythical elements and you get into
just the mess of what the Bible is. uh
in addition to philosophical training if
you get part of that in your seminary
and one of the pastor's uh quotes from
the study was seminary is where faith
goes to die because as soon as you start
to look at this thing it starts to fall
apart. So, it's this weird situation I
meet every day where people who don't
study the Bible tell me what's in it,
and then people who've actually studied
the Bible tell you that it's complex,
that it's contradictory, that it's myth
on top of translation, on top of myth,
on top of a scribe adding something
here, on top of this person says that
it's, you know, from this apostle, but
it's probably not. It's some of the
prophecies don't come true. And, uh, you
know, it's not often written by the
apostle that it claims to be. And when
it comes to Jesus, of course, like these
aren't eyewitnesses at all. And
sometimes God loses battles or sometimes
God commands genocide and slavery. And
God changes a lot based on how the
society changes. And it's just a mess.
And when you go into theology school, uh
especially if you were kind of raised in
church, you don't think that the Bible
is like that because you're taught that
the Bible is like this is the word of
God. And you know, this is this is the
doctrine here. And it it comes across as
if it's this more solid thing. And when
you start studying it, it starts falling
apart. And we also have the clergy
project which was founded from the
research from Daniel Dennett where now
there's a support group for the clergy
members who don't fully believe anymore
either as active pastors or former
pastors and most of them lost their
faith in school. And so former pastors
will often talk about this crisis that
happened when they start reading people
like Bartman learning about historical
Jesus um encountering theodysy problems.
Theodysy being you know the problem of
evil which is a really hard problem to
solve. Why did God have to sacrifice
himself in order to redeem his own
creation when I can just forgive without
any additional violence? What does that
mean that I can do something good that
God can't? Why did God create a system
where animals suffer for no salvific
reason? Because they don't learn moral
lessons when they are being eaten alive.
Why have millions of years of animal
suffering for no reason? You know,
starving, 99% going extinct without
humans even there. That's just cruel.
So, if God can interact with man, why be
silent for most of human history when
just imagine how scary it would have
been to be a human 5,000 years ago? You
don't know why people drop dead. You
don't know why there's an earthquake.
You don't know why the sun comes up. And
most people who have ever lived have
never heard of the correct god, whatever
that god is. This is the question that
even Richard Roar, the the Christian
mystic who I actually really like, um
says troubles him the most, which is why
would God create man to be so
superstitious? What was the point of all
of that? What is the point of all of
this? Um and all of these problems you
start to take seriously when you study
the Bible, when you study philosophy,
when you study religious commentary,
when you start studying other religions
and seeing that things like virgin
births are something that we do all the
time. Um when you start studying the
cognitive science of religion and what
becomes more and more clear is that this
is a human project. This project of
creating gods and everyone being sure of
their religion even though millions of
gods have already died and no longer are
being worshiped. Eventually you start to
take that step back as you are learning
all of this and looking at this from
different perspectives where you start
to have the thought of you know it's
like metacognition almost for the first
time where you start to say hey just
because I feel this thing when there's a
key change in a song about Jesus maybe
that actually doesn't mean that my
religion is true and everyone else's is
false maybe something bigger is going on
and then you start you know asking that
question of of what does it look like to
try to explain holy books and gods and
religions and why we co-evolved with
religion from a secular point of view
and then faith starts falling apart
because what is even the value of faith
why is faith believing in something
despite evidence or evidence that you
can't see why is that the highest moral
value for a god over compassion over
integrity over love over you know all
choose a you know choose a virtue choose
is a core value. All of that would be
better than faith. Why is faith at the
highest peak of of our um of our moral
hierarchy of values here? And it starts
just to make no sense. So what we're
seeing is that theology school is
creating atheists. And we when we look
at Harvard Divinity School, it is now
being run by an atheist. Greg Greg
Epstein has been the non-believing
humanist chaplain at Harvard since 2005.
He's an atheist. Um he said regarding
his like chapency's mission that his
goal is to serve students who find
themselves without faith highlighting a
need for spiritual care that goes beyond
religious structures. Now what we don't
know what I can't tell you is the
percent of the percentage of Christians
who lose their faith in theology school.
We can only guess at this because uh we
don't have a lot of studies on that for
one and the studies that we do have uh
like everything is so private like you
you know people talk about they're going
through their doubt phases behind closed
doors and so it's not even something
that's discussed openly and so we can't
get a sense of the numbers but our best
guess because we do have one study from
the Fuller Seminary that said about a
third of people uh experience a major
crisis of faith while in seminary. So a
third and then um of that group so
that's like 33% of that group you know
10% will move on to some kind of more
nuanced version of faith uh and then
about 20% will lose their faith
altogether. And so maybe that's not a
lot like you know one in five from that
study but just like imagine a a medicine
program where one in five people who go
in to become a doctor come out not
believing in science anymore. like
that's still a lot. Like these are
people who didn't want to lose their
faith. They were they were allin people
like me who um you know lose their faith
in theology school. So across the board
what we do know from the studies that we
do have uh and again I you know we can't
get a sense of the numbers but when when
you hear someone say I became an atheist
in theology school it's it's very
common. Um
but across the board the main reasons
for losing faith include you know
looking at the Bible with a a critical
lens with a historical critical method
lens and realizing that the Bible has
multiple authors and contradictions.
It's culturally cult culturally situated
in a context going into the philosophy
of religion, you know, grappling with
the problem of evil, divine
hiddenenness, which is like if God is
here, like where where's God? Alex
Okconor had um a debate one time where
he asked someone like I've been, you
know, Alex Okconor, like me, is an
atheist. He started out more atheistic
than I did. I I kind of made that
transition. But he um also spent a lot
of time in in school studying God and
theology and religion. And he asked
someone he was in debate with, "I've
looked for God. I've lived like a
Christian. I've read everything. I've
prayed. I've fasted. I've studied. Um
you know, I read the poems. I read the
mystics. I'm trying everything to be
able to have some kind of experience
with God and nothing." And so the
debater in response said um and like
this was the I guess the best answer
that you can do with this question. He
said that Alex is a better atheist for
the world than if he were a Christian
because he helps to refine Christianity
and religion with his questions and with
his critiques. So God is absent because
God would rather have Alex be an
atheist. Um, and so that that was an
interesting answer to watch that play
out in debate. And then also like
epistemology, how do you know that your
religion is true when everyone believes
their ism is true? Like then, you know,
something else must be going on here.
Uh, comparative religion, when you start
realizing that Christianity is not
unique when it comes to other religions,
virgin births are a dime a dozen.
Buddha, Egyptian gods. Whenever we want
to make someone special in a in a in a
story, we do a virgin birth because we
want this character to come into the
world, not the way that everybody else
does, which is like, you know, someone
having sex in the shed in the back or
whatever. So, we always do a virgin
birth backstory to to important people.
And then there's the moral distress,
coming into contact with the Bible's
violence and sexism and problematic
texts that have caused real harm into
the world. And so if you accept that
this is the way that God spoke to us and
God knew that certain verses would cause
unbelievable suffering, then God either
wasn't powerful enough to influence the
text or not good or doesn't care or
doesn't give a [ __ ] right? And then
there's also the peer deconstructions,
finding out that even professors that
you thought were like, "Hey, he's smart.
He must know something that I don't."
This was this was part of it for me
because when I was younger, I really
believed that these adults are smarter
than me. So, they see something then
that I don't. And then when you get
behind closed doors, you realize all
your professors are deconstructing their
faith and doing mental gymnastics and
they struggle with some aspects of
faith. And um when you learn that the
people you thought who were smarter than
you, who maybe um had reasons for their
faith that you didn't see yet, when you
realize that they're quietly doubting
too, it can also blow up your own faith.
And the big secret
um you know this this Tik Tok thing went
that went viral which is what is the
common knowledge in your field that
general general people don't know. And
for sure, the thing we all know in
theology school is that the Bible is
complicated. That things are allegorical
at best because literal interpretations
can't be true. And the Bible itself
cannot all be true. Um, and that
everyone has doubts and nonliteral
beliefs. And then they're expected as
pastors to give the congregation the
certainty that the congregation wants,
even though they know that it's more
complicated than that. And so in
seminaries behind closed school doors,
it's totally normal to go to school and
uh for your teacher to say things like
Genesis is clearly, you know, a mythical
origin story and we, you know, it's
borrowing these Babylonian sources or
Isaiah is written by at least three
different authors or um look at how
these nativity accounts contradict each
other. Um these are not just fringe
claims. This is this is consensus among
biblical scholars, even those who are
believers, right? Um, and so in
seminary, you're trained to hold
complexity. You're trained to read
ancient languages. You're trained to
understand historical context and
literary form. You learn that sacred
texts weren't written in a vacuum and
weren't dropped from the sky. They're
shaped by politics and power and oral
tradition and the anxieties of an
ancient people who don't even know what
germs are trying to make sense of the
world. And that honesty never makes it
to the pulpit because the modern church
isn't built to hold that kind of
uncertainty. Most congregants. Most
religious people don't come to church
for nuance. They come for clarity and
comfort and a sense of meaning and they
want answers and they want confidence.
They want their pastor to say, "Here's
what God wants you to do." Not, "Well,
ancient scribes disagreed about this and
this Hebrew word here is ambiguous and
the archaeology complicates things
further. Like pastors know know this.
They've been trained to hold multiple
interpretations while at the same time
training to dumb things down to protect
the faith of their flock. And that often
means withholding the very tools that
seminary gave them. And so the great
secret in my field is that pastors, all
pastors talk to each other behind closed
doors or in academic settings or or to
each other differently than how they
talk to their congregation. and they
learn how to do this like you know it's
a concept called don't scare the sheep
or sometimes it's called milk before
meat. Uh meaning you have to soften the
complexity to give people what they're
wanting out of church and what they're
paying you for. Um and so because that's
how often how you're getting paid,
you're not really incentivized to rock
that boat too much. And so what happens
is it creates this two-tier system of
theological discourse in a seminary
classroom. complexity is expected uh
behind the scenes. Even conservative
pastors will admit that they wrestle
with doubt, that they don't take every
verse literally, that they reinterpret
difficult passages to preserve some kind
of morality. But on Sunday morning, they
simplify, they sanitize, they emit, they
become translators. And not necessarily
because they're lying or being
deceptive. like um for example like a a
kindergarten teacher who's teaching
science is going to like meet the
children where they are even though they
know that whatever thing that they're
saying like birds fly or whatever they
know that it's more complex than that.
Um but they know that you know the
academic historical literary
psychological truth would destabilize
uh where people are in their faith when
they're coming to church. And then those
people would never make it to the more
complex versions of faith. And then they
would lose their job. So in their mind,
it helps no one to give people
complexity when people are showing up
for simplicity. And that's the quiet
kind of crisis of modern theology.
There's a gap between what the clergy
know when you actually study the Bible
and what the ley are told. And once
you're on the inside and you see, you
know, behind the sacred curtain, it's
hard to unsee it. So for some it will uh
give you a crisis of faith that will
deepen into something more mature. Uh
but eventually as that comes out in
whatever religion you're in, you you'll
often get exccommunicated for being
heretical in some way. And then for
others like me, it marks the beginning
of the end. And so we have another
study. It's Nancy Ammerman's
ethnographic research on pastors which
was in 1997. And it was in-depth
interviews with pastors. And it found
that most clergy kind of manage this
kind of dual consciousness where they're
privately aware of complex academic
theology, but they're publicly focused
on tradition and clarity and cohesion
and being helpful for people and and and
what people essentially want from
church. A quote from one pastor in that
study was, "We have to interpret things
in ways that people can hear. You can't
dump the documentary hypothesis on
someone in a sermon. And then we have
the Barner Group uh research on pastors
and doubt which was also in 2017 and it
said that 26% of pastors said that they
frequently study uh struggle with doubt
uh but they fear losing their role. They
are concerned about affecting people's
faith and the ethics behind that. And so
they just struggle privately behind
closed doors. And there's also this
belief that doubt is something that
needs to be privately processed.
Otherwise, you are damaging other
people's faith and then what if you're
wrong and what if what if God, you know,
throws you in hell for that? It's a
whole thing. And so across the
literature, what we're finding is that
clergy and seminary that are trained in
critical methods, source criticism,
comparative religion, historical
theology, it really starts to blow up
faith to even to uh create a deeper
faith which then you have to struggle
with uh because you know your
congregation's not going to want that or
you're going to lose all your faith, you
know, altogether. And once you're placed
in a church, you're going to feel
pressured to simplify and sanitize. And
this creates that dual discourse where I
will show you videos uh you can you can
see them where an academ academic
conference or theological conference or
clergy talking to each other and they
have one language for that and then they
have one language that they use for
their congregation and it's really
interesting to kind of watch that double
speak. Now, why this is getting to be
such a problem in America is that not
only does the congregation not want uh
complex theology, they just want watered
down theology. Um, and that's just kind
of always been the case and that's just
human nature. But with the environment
in America being as political as it is
right now with political identity first,
now your congre now your congregation
wants theology that supports their
political identity on both sides of the
aisle. I'm not even just talking about
the Christian right. I'm talking about
churches that operate on on the
political left as well. And so, not only
do you want a pastor to water down the
complexity of the Bible or um you know,
whatever aspect of your faith is, now
you also have to make it political.
Otherwise, you lose your congregation.
And we know this. People in America are
now more political than they are
theological. It used to be the the deal
uh 50 years ago that your religion would
guide your politics and now your
politics guide your religion. And so all
of this is like a big Dunning Krueger
effect where those who know about
religion in the Bible um or or sorry
those who don't know about religion in
the Bible and haven't studied it to this
level feel like they know what's in it.
And then those who go to school for that
know that it's a goddamn mess. And then
the ones that know that it's a mess are
secretly doubting or doing mental
gymnastics behind closed doors and are
being paid by the ones who want simple
politically charged theology. And yeah,
seeing all of that, seeing that sausage
factory is what makes theology school an
atheist factory. So, I'm going to pause
my notes here for a second because I'm
getting better at like anticipating the
comment that's going to come back
because like religious debates and just
debates with religious people in
general, they tend to have like things
that you'll predict that they're going
to say. And I know I can feel it in my
bones. The comment that's going to come
back is like, yes, you, you know,
there's issues with some scriptures and
there's issues with contradictions, but
if you just read this book and then
watch this YouTube video and then listen
to this guy, it'll all make sense. And
you start to play that game. And I have
so many people, I cannot even tell you
the emails that you get. I get thousands
of emails that say, you know, I've
listened to some of your concerns about
religion and I'll I'll get these like
long tree ties kind of uh emails where
they will show if you watch this and
read this book and then use this word to
mean that and and it's like this
incredibly complex structure of
apologetics to keep it going, then uh
you'll see that there's still room for
faith here and and you know this God is
still real or this religion is still
true or whatever it is. And the problem
with doing that, because I know there's
going to be some people who watch this
and are tempted to send that email to
me, the problem with doing that is the
more complex your apologetics gets,
which I, you know, I've studied some of
the most complex, nuanced, internally
consistent theological systems. Uh, the
more complex that it gets, the more
unethical it is because then you're
saying that
You know, for billions of people, this
is just a confusing mess. But if you
watch the correct combination of not
only the Bible, but Bible commentary and
books and this YouTube and this and this
pastor and then William Craig said this,
and if you put it all together, it'll
make sense. And then you can, you know,
have faith in it. And and this is, you
know, the the most rational way to to
look at God and make sense of the
universe. And even if you do that in
such a way where I look at it and I say,
you know what, that is internally
consistent. That is a a complex
theological system that makes sense.
Even if I give you that, you then have
to believe in a god that for everybody
else except you didn't do that. And so
everybody else is confused except you.
And so then you have to accept that you
live in a universe. And this is the
pride that I could never like I see
people have this kind of pride in ego.
Like you think atheists have pride. I
think this is the most prideful move
that you can make honestly. But I see
people who truly believe that billions
of people are wrong about their
intuitions about God and religion. but
that they were not only lucky but so
blessed and so godamn special that they
were not only born into the right
religion but born into the right form of
that religion and born in the right time
and watched the correct YouTube videos
in the correct order with the correct
books with the correct apologetics
to finally understand the secrets of the
universe and everybody else is confused.
and has to go through life being very
confused about what the [ __ ] is going on
here. So, I just like you can do that.
Like I see people make that move here
and I know people are going to want want
to write that email to me. But even if
you're right, like even if one of those
emails actually did figure it out, they
figured out the mysteries of the
universe, they they put together the
right combin combination of biblical
passages in order to really say, "I
think we've got it." Even if that were
true, I'm going to give it to you that
you're right and that's true. I wouldn't
worship a god that created a system
where billions of people are so confused
and so superstitious and and suffering
for reasons that they don't understand
just so you could figure it out. That's
unethical. Like that sucks. Like I can't
I can't possibly believe that. And so
the more that's the problem with with
apologetics getting more and more
complex is the more that you do that the
more it's a shitty god. And so even even
apologetics starts to kind of like be a
snake that eats its own tail because the
more work you have to do to try to make
sense of this and to try to make sense
of faith um the more unethical it is
that God created the world the way the
way that he you know claims to have made
in these religions. So, that's just like
some preventative measures for the
emails that I'm going to get where
someone and it's usually a man like I'm
just going to say it like it it it uh
99.9% of the time is is a man who emails
me telling telling me that they've
figured out the the mysteries of the
universe. And I just I've I've gone that
direction and I've been tempted to
study, you know, as as many of these as
they can. I read so many books of of
people who have claimed to put it all
together and it just falls apart when
you when you start to look at it because
it just makes this situation for
everybody else so incredibly unethical.
And you can't get out of this by just
saying free will. Like if I drop my
child off in Skid Row and tell them like
don't eat this apple and I write some
graffiti on the wall that they're
supposed to find and believe but also
ignore all the other graffiti on all the
other walls. um and that child ends up
in a bad situation, we don't say, well,
you know, that child had free will. We
say that's a shitty parent. Like that
parent shouldn't have brought that child
in the world to suffer with so little
tools and so little presence. And so
that's when you start to really see
religion for what it is, something that
we co-evolved with. And then like you
start reading like Yuval Harrari and
Sapiens and that once humans get over
150 people. Um religion is the most
powerful tool we've ever created because
now we can have shared stories and we
can grow to have communities that are
over 150 people and that was huge. So
once you and I kind of believe the same
sacred myth suddenly we could cooperate
more deeply. We'd trust each other more.
We could build bigger tribes. We could
bury our dead. We could have rituals. We
could have rights of passage. we could
create kingdoms and empires. And so
myths, whether it's myths about gods or
nations, are allowed are what allowed us
to go from like these scattered foragers
to rulers of the planet. And religion is
the original mythmaking machine and
engine behind that. And then Daniel
Dennit focuses on the mechanics and he
calls religion a kind of evolutionary
parasite that hijacked these useful
cognitive functions. And so at the base
of religion, what we see is um is our
ability to detect agency outside of us.
So if the grass rustles, it's um better
to assume that it's a lion than just the
wind. We have this agent detection
system that keeps us alive. But the
byproduct of keeping us alive is that we
are the descendants of the most
superstitious people because the ones
who thought there might be a lion there
and ran away are the ones who survived.
And so now we don't just anticipate a
lion in the grass. We also see in our
mind's eye things like gods and skies
and spirits and ghosts and aliens. And
then we add to that our ability to tell
stories and you know our human fears and
boom like religion. And so Dennett
points out that once these religious
stories become useful for bonding
communities and enforcing rules and
promising justice after death now we
start selecting for it culturally. And
the religions that spread were the ones
that helped societ society survive
better by giving the society things that
society needs to survive as a group but
also individually what helps us like we
don't have death anxiety if you have
some story where you cheat death. So
over time we co-evolved our brains got
better at believing and religions got
better at sticking and providing more
and more things. And so basically we've
evolved to be these meaning makers and
religion evolved to be a meaning
supplier and we co-evolved with it in
the same way that bees co-evolved with
flowers. And so the more complex we
became socially and emotionally, the
more elaborate religion became in in
response to that. And so this didn't
happen because religion is true in any
empirical sense. In fact, as far as
religion being good for you and studies
that show that religion is good for you,
it doesn't actually matter what the
religion is. Uh what matters is how is
it useful psychologically, socially,
politically and religion gave us the
glue for cooperation.
And it also gave us a lot of things
individually individually that we need.
Which brings us to Karl Marx who's often
misqued for just saying that religion is
the opium um of the people like it's
just this cheap drug for stupid people.
And that's not what he meant. The full
quote is much deeper. Religion is the
sigh of the oppressed creature, the
heart of a heartless world, the soul of
soulless conditions. It is the opium of
the people. So it's not he's not saying
it's a drug for stupid people. He's
saying this is a pretty rough world and
religion is what we've created to try to
make it a little bit better and try to
create communities and try to make
stories that make it not so damn scary
and hard to be a human. So Markx wasn't
saying that religion is just illusion.
He's saying it's a response to
suffering. It's a it's a response to the
reality that we find ourselves in
injustice and poverty and death and
meaninglessness. And we don't know why
we're here. And so if you're living
under brutal conditions with no power
and no hope, religion gives you comfort
and purpose and justice, even if it is
after death. And you pull it all
together and you really see that
religion isn't invented in this top-
down way. It grew alongside of us and
for us because we created it to be what
we needed it to be. It helped us survive
and organize and cope. And in that way,
it's not just that religion, we made
religion. Religion also made us. And so,
like any evolutionary adaptation, it
also means that it may not fit the
modern world anymore. We have an
evolutionary urge to eat all the sugar
when we get a taste of sugar because our
old brains are like, "Wow, this fruit is
only going to be ripe for a little bit
and then winter is coming so we need to
eat all this fruit and it hasn't
adjusted to the reality that I don't
need any more sugar in my life. I have
sugar all around me all the time." And
so now we're stuck like we're we're
evolutionarily stuck because we just
don't um evolve fast enough for the
modern world. We're stuck in this place
where theology school teaches
complexity. People want out of religion
safety, comfort, and simplicity. And in
America especially, they want political
validation for their political identity.
Which means now there's this huge
disconnect between pastors and their
congregations. And anyone in the
business knows this. But the
congregation doesn't know how much their
theology is being filtered and watered
down. How much the pastor has changed or
even lost their faith. How much their
pastor doesn't even really believe
literal interpretations of the Bible or
how differently they talk to each other
than they do to you. And so for some,
they come out of that experience in
theology school with like a super
nuanced mystical interfaith version of
religion that is like science friendly
and all of that. And I spent some time
there too. And that's like a natural
that's a natural first place to start
because it's the brain trying to hold on
to the religious benefits by making it
more and more complex and nuanced so you
can hold on to it. But for me and a lot
of others in theology school, you start
to see humans more and more behind this
project until you kind of like it's like
the God box gets smaller and smaller
until you like open the box one day and
there's no God in it at all. In the same
way that you can study the brain long
enough to say, "Wow, this really seems
to all we can explain all this at the
level of the brain. I don't even know
where a soul would fit into this." And
so your belief of the soul goes away
when you study the brain. And when you
study psychology, you become more and
more sure that this is schizophrenia,
not demons. And you just keep going
until there are better human and
scientific, naturalistic, psychological,
sociological, anthropological reasons
for what we're doing with religion. And
the god of the gats just becomes so
small that it disappears one day until
you get to the point that even if we
were created by some god like deism, not
theism, some higher power, some source,
then that god is either evil or not
powerful in us enough for us to care
about it. Because even if that were
true, we're alone when it comes to
actually trying to make the place the
world a place that we want to live. And
so at some point the question stops
being is it true? because the answer is
really no. And it becomes why do I need
it to be true? And once you ask that,
theology school doesn't just deconstruct
your beliefs. It starts to deconstruct
your reasons for believing, your fear,
your longing, your tribalism, your need
for justice in an unjust world. And then
you start to realize that you, just like
ancient peoples you've been studying,
created the God that you needed all
along, too. And if you can get better
resources for whatever that thing that
you need is that you created God for,
then your brain stops making gods at
all. It's mental work that my brain no
longer does because I have tools and
resources for all the reasons that we
create gods. And so, am I afraid of
God's wrath in my, you know, falling
apart here when it comes to theology?
Like, no. I'm not afraid of God's wrath
because a God worthy of worship would
know that I went to theology school to
try to get closer to God. would know
that I didn't choose to lose my belief,
would know that even now I'm trying to
help people by helping them rebuild some
kind of meaningful moral, spiritual,
communal, happy life when they've lost
their religious faith. And a God worthy
of worship, I think, would would
understand that. So, no, I'm not afraid
of God's wrath. And that's the thing
about Christianity and and why it breeds
atheism is it it it teaches you that
truth is good and worth pursuing and
that morality matters. And then when you
develop those skills, it ends up turning
on Christianity itself. And so that's
like the poetic tragedy of it. That
Christianity teaches you to value truth,
that truth will set you free, that
honesty and integrity matters, that
knocking and seeking will lead to
finding. It teaches you that that um the
good is worth sacrificing for. And
Christianity instills these values deep
in your bones to pursue truth. To live
ethically, don't settle for li to for
lies. Be brave, be courageous, don't
look away from injustice. And so you do,
you read, you study, you ask the hard
questions, you go to seminary, you take
um the Bible at its word. And then you
actually internalize those values and
you come face to face with the parts of
Christianity that can't withstand them.
And you eventually, it's like
Christianity trains you how to leave it.
And so the doubters in theology school
make the final move, which is to take
all of that truth seeeking and moral
courage that you've been practicing
within Christianity and now take that
scary step to step outside of it. Not
because it's cool, not because you
wanted to, not because you get to sin,
you know, whatever that is. Um, but
because it's not true. It's not and
often it's not good. And perhaps that's
the most Christian move to do of all to
ha to learn in Christianity moral
courage and fidelity to truth. And these
stories that talk about leaving behind
your possessions and your job and your
family and your identity for what's true
and what's right. And maybe in some
final irony, the ones who go to theology
school and then end up leaving
Christianity, maybe that is actually the
most Christian move you can make of all.
So that's how I follow Jesus. Now, uh,
when people ask me what Jesus is to me,
how I follow Jesus is I want to flip the
same tables that Jesus flipped. I want
to be the good Samaritan where the
Samaritan didn't have correct beliefs,
but he had the most loving actions and
he sat and mourned with those that
mourned and helped people who were
hurting. And so, that's how I follow
Jesus. Now, I don't have any faith that
Jesus is divine or all of the stories
that we wrote later trying to make this
mystic, homeless, radical man into a
god. Uh but there are beautiful things
about those parables about about love
and about ego and about um character
that matters and about um integrity and
about truth and about flipping tables of
of the bureaucracy and the institution
and and when we turn the sacred into
money and into businesses.
And so there's still something in Jesus
that I'm still drawn to that I feel
still feel is beautiful even though I
don't have any faith that he was any
more than a man. And he's like so many
other mystic teachers that we've had
like Roomie and Rabia and and Buddha and
and he's in that camp of of homeless
people who saw something more in the law
than how people were using it at the
time. that there was there was some
beauty underneath that some some mystic branch
branch
uh underneath that. I'm just blabbing on
here that is still that is still
beautiful and worth holding on to and
worth even seeking. Even if all of our
religions were wrong, even if there's no
God at all, even if this is just a human
project, there's still a baby in that
bathwater that's worth pursuing. Even if
all of this is just a human project. So,
I'll see you next week and let me know
what you thought about today's episode,
which was all about how Theology School
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
Works with YouTube, Coursera, Udemy and more educational platforms
Get Instant Transcripts: Just Edit the Domain in Your Address Bar!
YouTube
←
→
↻
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc
YoutubeToText
←
→
↻
https://youtubetotext.net/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc