0:02 welcome to the Larry Orange Show on the
0:04 Hillsdale College podcast Network I
0:06 would be Larry Arne president of
0:07 Hillsdale College
0:09 and I have a great and mighty guest
0:11 today and his name is Jordan Peterson
0:15 Jordan Peterson is a psychologist and an academic
0:17 academic
0:19 and he's had two careers I think it's
0:20 fair to say
0:24 and one he taught some at Harvard and uh
0:26 whatever he taught later for a long time
0:28 at Toronto University of Toronto and
0:30 wherever he taught he leaves a trail
0:33 behind him of students who love him and
0:35 they testified at what it is about him
0:37 that they love and you're going to see
0:38 it for yourself in a few minutes
0:41 in his second career it starts when a
0:42 few years ago he took a stand about
0:44 something which was a law
0:47 in Canada that would require people
0:49 change all kinds of things
0:53 that defy everything ordinary gender
0:56 stuff mostly and he stood up against
0:59 that and of course a firestorm came
1:02 and he didn't Retreat into any hole he'd
1:04 never been any good at being in a hole
1:06 he decided to go public
1:09 and what I like about I I admire him
1:10 very much and know him well I'm
1:12 privileged that way
1:14 is that his public career follows the
1:17 same pattern as his academic career
1:20 he's a teacher and he's Relentless and
1:24 he's curious and he knows a lot of stuff
1:26 and he teaches people and they are
1:28 grateful except for the ones who don't
1:30 want teaching to happen and they are
1:32 enraged and he's courageous in the face
1:35 of that welcome Jordan Peterson thank
1:37 you sir because you're a teacher and
1:39 because I'm curious about it I want to
1:42 talk about psychology about what it is
1:45 and I know that you like Carl Young
1:48 and because of that I never did without
1:50 knowing much about him I've been reading
1:52 up on him some and I want you to explain
1:55 the general thing what is the discipline
1:56 of psychology and then something about
2:00 him if you care to say well
2:02 we all exist at multiple levels simultaneously
2:04 simultaneously
2:06 right we exist at
2:09 subatomic level in the atomic level in
2:11 the molecular level and
2:14 the level of organs and the level of our
2:16 body and
2:18 and we have motivational systems and
2:21 emotional systems and cognitive systems
2:23 and perceptual systems and
2:27 psychology is the study of
2:30 the the integration of all of those
2:33 subordinate levels into the individual
2:36 right so you can study all those levels
2:37 right up to the level of the individual and
2:38 and
2:40 and you're in the domain of psychology
2:43 and so I like that that integrative
2:45 function of psychology and so when I was
2:47 in graduate school in particular
2:50 the PHD work I did was really quite
2:54 biological I was looking at the genetic
2:56 the psychological manifestations of the
2:59 genetic predisposition to alcoholism and
3:02 anti-social behavior and alcohol is a
3:05 pharmacological agent and it spreads
3:07 through the brain like water because it
3:08 crosses the blood-brain barrier it's one
3:10 of the few chemicals that can do that
3:13 and so to study alcohol's effect on
3:16 psychology you have to study alcohol's
3:18 effect on the brain but it affects every
3:21 bit of the brain and every bit of the
3:24 brain is quite a lot to study and so as
3:26 I was studying alcoholism and the
3:29 predispositioned alcoholism I was
3:31 simultaneously studying how the brain
3:33 works to understand how Alcohol and
3:35 Other Drugs changed its function and
3:37 that got me deep into the study of
3:40 Neuroscience and affect of Neuroscience
3:42 in particular that's the Neuroscience of
3:44 emotion and motivation and that was a
3:46 burgeoning field at the time and I read
3:49 some of the great early classic Works in
3:51 that field and at the same time I was
3:54 reading a lot of work on the clinic
3:56 front great clinicians including the
3:58 people you mentioned Freud and Jung and
4:01 I was integrating across those which was
4:03 something that that hadn't been done and
4:05 my first book maps of meaning was an
4:09 attempt to integrate across all those
4:11 levels from the biological to the
4:12 narrative that's a good way of thinking
4:15 about it uh
4:18 young do you call yourself a union
4:21 to some degree yes um I would I don't
4:22 describe myself that way but it's
4:26 definitely the case I mean I I
4:28 started reading Freud before I read you
4:32 and I liked Freud a lot for a variety of reasons
4:34 reasons so
4:36 so
4:38 we we could go back to Nature to explain
4:41 this more properly so Nietzsche back in
4:44 the late 1800s announced that God was
4:46 dead and what he meant by that
4:49 essentially was that the unity of
4:51 conception that had
4:54 brought us together psychologically and socially
4:55 socially
4:57 was disintegrating and Nietzsche knew
5:00 what the consequence of that would be
5:02 he knew that the consequence of that
5:04 would be nihilism and hopelessness on
5:06 the one hand and a turned towards
5:09 totalitarian certainties on the other he
5:11 nailed that Dostoevsky knew the same
5:13 thing and Nietzsche saw a way out he
5:16 thought and his way out was that human
5:18 beings would have to become they would
5:21 have to adopt the men of what they had
5:23 deposed and so he thought that people
5:25 would have to become gods in some way
5:29 and that we could do that by creating
5:31 our own values that we would have to
5:33 take it upon ourselves to create our own
5:34 values since they were no longer handed
5:36 down on high from some Transcendent
5:38 source and
5:40 all of the arguments that Nietzsche laid
5:42 out were very powerful including that
5:44 one but reading Freud helped me
5:46 understand why Nietzsche was wrong
5:48 because Freud
5:52 noted more clearly than anyone else at
5:54 least at that time that we were not the
5:56 Masters in our own houses
5:59 and that the notion that we could
6:01 produce our own values
6:04 was predicated on an assumption that in
6:06 some manner we were intrinsically
6:09 unitary masters of our own destiny our
6:11 own cognition our own perceptions our
6:13 own emotional states and Freud really
6:15 flipped that on its head he said
6:17 no we're more like a haunted house full
6:20 of autonomous spirits and those Spirits
6:22 have those would be complexes in the
6:24 psychoanalytic term and those complexes
6:26 those autonomous Spirits some of which
6:29 are motivational forces let's say or
6:33 emotional uh emotional systems they have
6:35 an autonomy and a will that can easily
6:38 supersede our own and so it isn't
6:40 obvious at all that because we're
6:42 masters of not Masters in our own house
6:45 that we can in any way create our own
6:47 values and Freud
6:49 Freud
6:51 I think the weakness of Freud
6:55 was that he pronounced one motivational
6:59 system superordinate sex and you could
7:02 say with some real truth that Freud
7:06 replaced the god of his ancestors Yahweh
7:08 Freud was Jewish he replaced the god of
7:11 his ancestors with with sexuality and
7:15 put that at the Pinnacle of human of the
7:18 human psychological hierarchy and Jung
7:21 who was a student of Freud's although
7:23 also a student of Nietzsche's and
7:24 perhaps more deeply a student of
7:27 Nietzsche's objected to that he did not
7:28 believe that
7:31 it was appropriate to
7:33 make the presumption that sex ruled
7:37 overall and I read a lot of you when I
7:39 especially when I was in graduate school
7:41 I think he had I think there's 20
7:42 volumes in his collected work something
7:44 like that I read every single one of
7:46 them and I didn't just read them
7:48 I actually understood them and that took
7:50 a lot of work I read archetypes of the
7:51 collective unconscious it was the first
7:54 book by Jung I wrote I read
7:57 um little Freudian slip there um
7:57 um
8:00 I read it three times before I knew what
8:01 the hell he was talking about because
8:04 what Jung is talking about is so strange
8:06 that it's almost impenetrable and then
8:09 when you do penetrate it it's terrifying
8:10 that's why psychologists don't like you
8:12 that's why people in general don't it's
8:14 like he's very hard to understand and
8:16 then when you do understand him he's
8:18 very very terrifying because
8:21 Freud made the case that we were haunted
8:23 by ghosts and Jung made the case that we
8:26 were haunted by demons and gods and
8:27 that's much more accurate and when you
8:29 start to understand that man the world
8:31 is not the same it is seriously not the same
8:32 same
8:35 so uh we're going to talk about sex some
8:37 today because that's all over the place desire
8:39 desire
8:42 estrangement from and fascination with
8:45 sex today have to do with Freud
8:48 um it has to do with what Freud observed
8:51 because and Freud was correct in that
8:54 sex is a dominating Force Nietzsche said
8:56 every Drive attempts to philosophize in
8:59 its Spirit brilliant brilliant aphorism
9:02 he was really something and
9:05 when when the world collapses into
9:08 materialist atheism let's say it's
9:10 highly likely that sex will arise as the
9:14 dominant goddess likely goddess it's
9:17 likely on the feminine side more more
9:18 accurately if you think about it
9:20 historically now did Freud bring that about
9:22 about
9:27 partly because Freud made the case that
9:29 there was no metaphysical reality let's
9:31 say there were biological realities and
9:33 that the prime biological reality was
9:37 that of sex and so he laid some of the
9:39 groundwork for those metaphysical claims but
9:42 but
9:49 even though he believed that sex was a
9:52 dominating force it isn't clear at all
9:54 that he believed that it should be now
9:56 if you pushed Freud and what he thought
9:58 should be at the Pinnacle of the moral hierarchy
10:00 hierarchy
10:02 he would say something like the ability
10:04 to work and play
10:07 and that's not bad you know that's not
10:09 too bad and he had a wisdom and Freud
10:12 was also a very practical clinician
10:15 but he also viewed see Freud was deeply
10:18 anti-religious in the enlightenment
10:21 tradition and he told Jung at one point
10:25 that it was necessary to make of the dog
10:28 of the doctrine of sexual motivation and
10:31 unshakable bulwark against a black tide
10:33 of occultism and it's an interesting
10:36 interesting phrase because there was a
10:38 black tide of occultism coming and we've
10:39 certainly seen that unfold over the
10:42 course of the 20th century but
10:44 it's also
10:47 highlights one of Freud's metaphysical weaknesses
10:48 weaknesses
10:50 and it was the weakness that separated
10:53 Jung from Freud was the and that was
10:55 that Freud's
10:58 materialist deterministic atheism
11:01 made him incapable of contending with
11:03 the realities of the religious World
11:07 properly and that undermined his
11:10 what would you say his ability to sit at
11:12 the proper Pinnacle of the of the
11:14 psychoanalytic hierarchy so Jung
11:17 believed like Jung believed that he had
11:20 a conception that he put forward as the self
11:21 self
11:25 and the self is you
11:28 it's the four-dimensional you and so why
11:31 four dimensions well because
11:34 here you are now in this room at this
11:37 time but you are something that extends
11:39 across time from birth till death and
11:43 the totality of you is that entire
11:46 being is stretched across time
11:49 and Jung self is the four-dimensional
11:52 totality of the person Jung was a very
11:54 sophisticated thinker and he believed
11:57 that Christ was a symbol of the self
12:01 now what Jung believed religiously
12:03 that's a very difficult thing to put
12:04 your finger on because he was a very
12:06 sophisticated thinker
12:09 um I would put him firmly in the
12:11 Christian Camp
12:13 but he's not a normal Christian by any
12:16 stretch of the imagination
12:18 when he says something like Christ is a
12:21 symbol of the self he meant something
12:24 very deep he meant that
12:27 well he meant for example that at the
12:30 highest level of conceptualization the
12:32 human being is something doomed to
12:34 suffer through death and hell and to
12:36 emerge Reborn
12:39 and he really believed that and not in
12:41 the way that you believe something
12:43 Preposterous because it's an element of
12:45 Faith but because he saw that as
12:48 the deepest form of wisdom and he also
12:49 saw it as something that was inevitably true
12:51 true
12:53 the soul is by nature Christian that was
12:55 certainly something young believed
12:57 now let's try to relate that because so
12:59 something amazing is going on in the
13:02 world uh we are trying to transform
13:05 ourselves into whatever we want to be
13:07 sexual and everything else and you've
13:10 taken a stand against that I'd like you
13:14 to why and also what in Psychology has
13:16 led you to well don't do that when when
13:19 when when you say so
13:21 there's a battle right now going on in
13:24 our culture about self-definition I am
13:27 whatever I say I am which is by the way
13:28 what God said to Moses when he
13:31 proclaimed his identity right and that's
13:34 not a trivial comment on what's
13:36 Happening Now Jung believed that the
13:38 logical conclusion of protestantism was
13:39 that everyone would become their own church
13:41 church
13:42 right and he really meant when Myung
13:45 said something he meant it like all the
13:47 way down and so the logical conclusion
13:49 of you being your own church is that
13:50 you're your own God and that you get to
13:52 Define yourself and you might say well
13:56 why can't I Define myself an answer the
13:57 right answer is
13:58 what the hell do you know about who you are
13:59 are
14:02 and you think that there's something in
14:04 you that's yourself that's defining you
14:05 but how do you know you're not just a
14:07 pawn of that thing you think is yourself
14:10 and so the Fatal weakness on the
14:12 self-definition front is oh I see you're
14:15 gripped so firmly by your sexuality that
14:17 your sexuality now proclaims that it's
14:20 you and you believe that and you think
14:22 that's you you don't think that you're
14:24 worshiping a polytheistic Pagan goddess
14:27 or that or that she's got you in her
14:29 grip you think that's you because you
14:33 have an intrinsic theory of yourself and
14:35 your theory of yourself is whatever you
14:37 want hedonistically in this moment rules
14:39 everyone including you and that's right
14:41 and that everyone who opposes that is
14:44 nothing but a a demon essentially that
14:46 means everybody who opposes that doesn't
14:49 get the same favor they can't they can't
14:51 Define themselves the way well that's
14:53 that's the incoherence problem but uh
14:56 but the radical types the narcissistic
14:57 radical types they don't give a damn
14:58 about incoherence because what they give
15:00 a damn about is that they get to exactly
15:02 what the hell they want with whoever
15:05 they want this moment and if that's now
15:08 this is this is where the rubber meets
15:10 the road you might say well what's the
15:12 problem with that
15:13 it's like why can't I just do whatever
15:15 the hell I want whenever the hell I want
15:17 to do it with whoever I want to do it
15:19 with and the answer is because
15:21 everything goes to hell if you do that
15:22 including you
15:24 and you say well I don't believe in hell
15:26 and I say well keep acting the way you
15:29 are and you will
15:31 right for sure now everyone with an
15:33 ounce of sense an iota of sense and this
15:35 is actually what defines sense knows
15:39 perfectly well if they only do exactly
15:41 what they want to do in accordance with
15:42 the whim of the moment which then
15:44 becomes their God right because if
15:46 you're motivated by the whim of the
15:48 moment and you place that above all else
15:50 that is now your god well what's the god
15:52 well in this case let's say it's sexual
15:55 motivation well if sexual motivation is
15:57 your god you will end up in something
15:59 indistinguishable from hell because you
16:02 will you will misuse other people you
16:04 will make them objects of your own
16:07 narrow and immediate desire and you'll
16:10 have no relationships you'll exploit
16:12 everyone including yourself and there's
16:15 that's no way to live well why is that
16:16 no way to live you're just moralizing
16:18 it's like no live like that for two
16:21 years and find out what happens no one
16:23 with any sense will want to be within 20
16:25 feet of you
16:27 and that's because you'll do nothing but
16:29 exploit including and the thing you'll
16:32 exploit will include that higher self
16:34 whose existence you don't you you don't
16:36 even imagine right because you've
16:38 already subjugated yourself to the
16:40 immediacy of your idiot whim
16:42 and the people who identify themselves
16:44 on sexual grounds do that all the time
16:47 my Paramount Feature is who I'm sexually
16:49 attracted to it's really that's your
16:51 Paramount Feature is it that's your
16:53 definition of your intrinsic self to
16:55 call you primitive is an insult to
17:01 so
17:03 uh I want to suggest what's been swept
17:06 away by all this uh in classic
17:07 philosophy in most philosophies since then
17:08 then
17:11 the idea was we have a nature everything
17:12 has a nature
17:14 and the nature and our happiness and
17:16 well-being depends upon fulfilling our
17:19 nature my little bit of reading of young
17:21 suggested he thought roughly like that
17:23 in other words if he was going to give
17:25 somebody therapy he tried to help him
17:27 become a better person like a person
17:29 would be well that word nature is
17:31 interesting because uh it comes from a
17:33 Latin word it means birth
17:35 it means the process of begetting and
17:37 growth by which we come to be
17:40 well if you lose your nature
17:43 then you have no purpose outside your
17:46 own will and now my question
17:48 you've been particularly helpful and
17:51 popular with men young men especially
17:53 why is that do you think well
17:54 well
17:58 you you can't lose your nature exactly
18:00 you can lose your higher order
18:03 integrated purpose-driven nature here
18:06 are some Natures you won't lose pain
18:07 pain
18:11 anxiety like you can lose your higher
18:14 nature all you want and
18:16 all of the negative elements of your
18:18 nature will predominate and you're not
18:20 going to rationalize yourself out of
18:23 pain and anxiety this is the thing about
18:26 those who believe life has no meaning
18:28 it's like I see so you think you can
18:30 argue yourself out of your pain
18:32 because Pain's a meaning now you might
18:33 say well it's not a meaning I want to
18:36 pursue it's like what does that have to
18:38 do with anything pain is an undeniable reality
18:40 reality
18:43 well if you allow your higher order self
18:46 to disintegrate you just you
18:47 disintegrate into a landscape
18:50 characterized by pain anxiety and
18:52 hopelessness that's the metaphysical
18:55 desert by the way right that's the place
18:59 you end up devolving into when your
19:02 tyrannical presuppositions are
19:05 disintegrate which is why people cling
19:07 to their tyrannical presuppositions
19:09 because you know there's a mystery well
19:11 you don't want to end up in the
19:13 landscape of pain anxiety and
19:15 hopelessness and I actually mean that
19:16 technically because what happens when
19:18 you lose direction
19:21 the biological systems that mediate
19:23 negative emotions signal loss of
19:26 Direction that's What anxiety is it's a
19:28 signal of loss of Direction so if you
19:29 lose higher order Direction you become
19:32 anxious well and you can argue with
19:34 anxiety all you want with your atheistic
19:36 nihilism but it isn't going to go away
19:38 and neither is your pain and so one of
19:41 the things I've told my audiences is
19:43 you have to be a fool if you doubt the
19:46 reality of pain and anxiety pain and
19:49 Terror let's say are they real
19:50 it's like well
19:52 of course that's an ontological argument
19:54 they're real enough so you'll act like
19:56 they're real if they come knocking so
19:58 maybe we can suffice
20:00 we can we can satisfy ourselves with
20:02 that Proclamation and you say well are
20:04 they the Ultimate Reality pain and and
20:06 suffering and that's a good question
20:09 that's a tough question and I would say no
20:11 no
20:14 the things that transcend pain and
20:16 suffering are more real than pain and
20:19 suffering well what transcends
20:22 Suffering The Eternal verities transcend
20:25 suffering and the higher order nature of
20:30 man is the antidote to catastrophic
20:32 suffering it's the antithesis of Hell
20:35 well what is that is that real well if
20:37 pain and suffering are real and if you
20:38 can transcend them
20:40 through Allegiance with a higher order
20:42 self well then the higher order self is
20:44 obviously not only real but more real
20:47 well what is that well this is why Jung
20:50 said Christ was a symbol of the self how
20:52 do you transcend the Eternal realm of
20:54 suffering right how do you escape from
20:56 hell it's the same question
20:58 um how about
21:02 voluntary self-sacrifice how about that
21:04 well that's absolutely no different than
21:06 the image of the crucifix those are the
21:08 same thing well why does the spirit of
21:11 voluntary self-sacrifice
21:14 protect you against suffering well
21:17 I need to sacrifice my idiot whims in
21:19 the moment to serve
21:22 that element of me that is continuous
21:25 across time this is like kant's
21:28 categorical imperative in some ways
21:31 if I'm wise and mature then I don't make
21:34 decisions now
21:36 that will cost me tomorrow or next week
21:39 or next month or next year or five years
21:42 down the road I I contemplate my
21:43 extended self which is like a community
21:46 across time and I bind my decisions in
21:49 the present by my Covenant with my
21:51 future self and there's no difference
21:53 between doing that that means I
21:56 sacrifice my the whims of the moment to the
21:57 the
22:00 to the optimization of the medium and
22:03 long run and I do the same thing in
22:04 relationship to other people those are
22:05 the same thing there is no difference
22:08 this is this is a gospel equation in
22:10 some ways there is no difference between
22:11 treating you properly and treating
22:13 myself properly and that's because in
22:15 the final analysis
22:16 there's actually no difference between
22:20 you and me not not not fundamentally the
22:22 classic account of this an American
22:24 account for most of our history is
22:26 that's because we're the same kind of
22:29 thing we're equal and that and in what
22:31 way are we equal we're equal in our natures
22:32 natures
22:34 uh and and
22:37 the troubled part comes this way
22:42 if our Natures include how we come to be
22:45 then the differences between the Sexes
22:48 are also part of our rights
22:51 and also therefore our obligations
22:54 and that's what you're telling me this
22:55 morning about a law that's proceeding in
22:57 Ireland and uh
22:59 they're going to make it illegal to
23:03 possess books that claim that sex is an
23:05 innate feature or that you don't get to
23:06 choose your own is that what it is
23:08 that's part of it yeah yeah well that's
23:10 it depends on how they Define they it
23:13 defend depends on how they
23:16 end up defining hate speech but that's
23:18 already built into the law that the the
23:21 idea that making a distinction between
23:24 men and women that's categorical that's
23:26 already part of hate speech yeah yeah
23:31 well it is in part it isn't part of
23:33 spring this is again where you see the
23:35 weakness in Nietzsche's argument well
23:37 here's the values we've created
23:39 well that's not a very good replacement
23:43 for God our replacement for God is
23:45 narcissistic radicals get to do whatever
23:47 the hell they want whenever they want
23:49 all the time and if you oppose it then
23:52 it's prison for you well you know that's
23:54 not much of a substitute for what we had before
23:55 before
23:59 so and that was our I went to the Church
24:03 of this Holy Sepulcher in Rome and
24:06 that was the first established church
24:09 and it became the model
24:12 for European Society so it's so
24:14 interesting the way it's these
24:15 conceptions are laid out let's say
24:18 architecturally rather than conceptually
24:20 so at the very center you have the
24:22 crucifix the cross and that's that's
24:24 what would you say that's the point where
24:26 where
24:29 all of reality comes to a point and it's
24:31 the point of maximal suffering and it's
24:33 more than that it's the point of
24:35 voluntarily accepted maximal suffering
24:38 and the notion is that
24:41 that's a sacrifice
24:43 why is it a sacrifice you have to sacrifice
24:44 sacrifice
24:48 you have to sacrifice your lower self to
24:50 your higher self in order for you to
24:53 proceed in a healthy manner to be
24:55 resilient but also for you to
24:56 participate in the Covenant that would
24:59 make for a United Society you have to
25:00 and that there's no difference between
25:02 that maturation because a lot of what
25:04 maturation is is
25:06 to give up the attractions of the
25:08 immediate present in the service of something
25:09 something
25:12 broader and higher and that would be you
25:14 in the broader sense and what's in your
25:15 best interest but also the community
25:18 simultaneously those are the same thing
25:20 so at the center of the community you
25:23 have a sacrifice the voluntary sacrifice
25:25 of self that's the center around that
25:26 you have the church you have the altar
25:28 then you have the church then you have
25:30 the town and around the town you have
25:32 the state and then you have the nation
25:34 and that's all
25:36 resting on this Spirit of voluntary
25:38 self-sacrifice right and that's the
25:41 foundation stone of the community Jung
25:44 knew that young knew that and Freud
25:47 didn't and because Freud was he was a
25:50 materialistic deterministic atheist of
25:52 the 19th century and Jung is a 20th
25:54 century thinker maybe he's a 21st
25:56 century thinker even that's certainly
25:59 possible so Churchill said uh it wrote
26:02 once in a book called my early life you
26:04 must nail your life to a cross of
26:07 thought or action now he ended up doing
26:09 both but in other case whichever way you
26:12 go so you could say in your life Jordan Peterson
26:13 Peterson
26:16 uh it was more thought in the beginning
26:19 and it might be more action now but in
26:22 another case it's a cross that's how you
26:23 think of it
26:25 well you can either lift up a cross or
26:28 have one dropped on you yeah
26:30 right there's no non-cross option in
26:32 this world
26:33 and that's really worth knowing too and
26:35 I tell my audiences that consistently
26:37 it's like
26:39 you all know perfectly well that your
26:42 idiot henism Hedonism your idiot
26:44 immature Hedonism is going to vanish in
26:45 a puff of smoke at the first sign of
26:48 trouble you know that and you know that
26:50 it's thin gruel that's why you're
26:53 hedonistic and hopeless at the same time
26:56 know that you need something beyond that
26:59 why because life in some ways is unbearable
27:00 unbearable
27:03 and so you need something worth bearing
27:06 to make it bearable and life is very
27:09 heavy load and so that means you have to
27:12 carry something very heavy to justify it
27:14 now I see this in the biblical Corpus
27:16 for example quite clearly laid out in
27:18 the story of Abraham which is very
27:20 interesting story of course Abraham is
27:23 the founder of Nations and so and you
27:25 might say well is that true it's like
27:28 those are such stupid questions that
27:30 that's such a stupid question it's a
27:32 definition in this story so the
27:34 definition is
27:36 the spirit of Abraham
27:39 is the founder of Nations right that's
27:42 the that's the Declaration of the story
27:43 and you're you're to come to understand
27:46 that when you read the story
27:47 now you might say well what did the
27:49 people who wrote the story mean by that
27:51 and the answer is well they didn't know
27:54 and that's why they wrote the story like
27:56 the story is the explanation okay so
27:58 what's the story well
28:02 Abraham is a human being and that means
28:04 he's like a natural human being and that
28:09 means he's useless and lazy and if he
28:12 can have it easy he will and so Abraham
28:14 is like the first case of white
28:16 privilege there's a good joke he's Rich
28:19 his parents are rich and he can just lay
28:21 around his tent all day and eat peeled
28:23 grapes and have like beautiful slave
28:26 women wave palm fronds over him and do
28:29 nothing and he does that for like 83 years
28:30 years
28:32 and then one day a voice comes to him
28:36 right a spirit he's inspired by a spirit
28:40 and what's the nature of the spirit well
28:41 it's the spirit that calls him to Adventure
28:42 Adventure
28:45 and it says to him get your lazy ass the
28:48 hell out of the tent You're Made for
28:49 More Than This
28:53 and so Abraham in a great Act of Faith
28:56 abides by the intuition of this spirit
29:00 and he leaves his comfortable infancy
29:04 right because he's an infant he lives in
29:06 an infantile Utopia that's right well
29:08 what do I want well I never want to be
29:11 hungry and I never want to be thirsty
29:13 but I never have I never want to be
29:15 deprived it's like well great you're an
29:16 infant sleeping in a crib you've got
29:18 infant Paradise is that what you're made
29:21 for right the mere cessation of your
29:24 needs that's your vision of Utopia is it
29:26 well that was Abraham's vision of utopia
29:28 and a counter Spirit came along and said
29:30 get your lazy ass the hell out of your
29:32 tent and get out there in the world and
29:34 of course it's a complete catastrophe
29:37 right like he faces tyranny and War and
29:40 the necessary sacrifice of his son and
29:43 and collusion among the aristocrats to
29:45 steal his wife and like it's just a
29:48 disaster in 10 different directions
29:51 but it's an adventure
29:53 it's an adventure right and so what's
29:55 life is it like is it is it hedonistic
29:57 infantile Bliss this is something
29:59 Dostoevsky objected to or is it a
30:01 romantic adventure well what do people
30:04 go watch when they go see a movie
30:06 they watch a romantic adventure well why
30:07 because that's what they want in their
30:09 life they don't want
30:12 peace and tranquility and guaranteed
30:15 basic income and the pleasures of
30:18 infantile gratified infantile dependents
30:20 they want a bloody adventure and if they
30:22 don't get a real Adventure they'll take
30:24 a false one and wreak havoc and we have
30:26 no shortage of false adventures in our
30:30 culture so the the woke culture and the
30:32 transgender movement and all these great
30:35 things that have come upon us so hard
30:37 uh are they going to suppress that for
30:38 people you're not going to get to have
30:40 your adventure you're gonna well they
30:42 put forward a false adventure and the
30:45 false Adventure is wave a placard and
30:47 save the world
30:48 that's right look great isn't that
30:50 wonderful all you have to do you know
30:52 how I stopped getting protesters to my
30:54 events at University
30:57 I held them in the morning
31:00 it's great no kidding eh I'm the Messiah
31:02 yeah really well as long as you don't
31:04 want me to get out of bed before noon
31:07 yeah so that's the false Adventure sold
31:09 to young kids it's like well the
31:11 planet's going to hell in a hand basket
31:13 that's the claim it's like yeah yeah the
31:15 planet's always been going to hell in a
31:17 hand basket right the apocalypse is
31:19 always nigh and that's because we die
31:22 and so does everything else and so well
31:25 the apocalypse is nigh and you can save
31:27 the world by protesting against those
31:29 who are at fault that's the what the
31:31 universities sell young people well it's
31:33 an adventure right they have a Messianic
31:36 urge at that age and that really never
31:38 goes away and people in some fundamental
31:40 sense but it's particularly acute when
31:42 adolescents late adolescents are trying
31:44 to catalyze their identity and the left
31:47 offers these false Adventures you can be
31:49 you you print out a sign that says I
31:52 oppose poverty as if anyone doesn't and
31:55 you wave that around publicly which is
31:57 the same as praying in public right it's
31:59 a great sin and you Proclaim your moral
32:02 virtue and bang that's your adventure
32:05 and it's a cheap it's a cheap Pathway to
32:08 to reputational accomplishment and and
32:10 part of the reason young guys do it you
32:12 know perfectly well is because they're
32:14 trying to impress young women and it's
32:16 kind of uh what would you say there's a surface
32:18 surface
32:20 a surface
32:24 attraction to being a kind of rebellious
32:27 quasi-shake guavera type and to be
32:29 taking on you know the evil corporations
32:31 of the world when you're 18 you know
32:33 instead of
32:36 working at 7-Eleven and handing out
32:38 sugar water to kids do you think that
32:40 there's something that young people
32:44 really need that will ultimately redeem
32:46 them from this and not enough enough of
32:48 them at least to save the world you
32:50 think that they need a burden they need
32:52 a burden absolutely and they want one
32:55 yeah absolutely well and you can explain
32:58 that to them in some ways the way I just
33:01 explained it it's like look guys you're
33:03 gonna suffer and most of her already
33:05 suffering so they know that it's like
33:08 and you want to suffer stupidly too
33:11 because that's even worse and then you
33:13 do you want to contemplate for a moment
33:14 What's going to
33:17 be your Ark when the storms come well I
33:19 can tell you what it is and you already
33:20 know this because you've consulted your
33:21 own conscience when you're awake at
33:23 three in the morning thinking about what
33:25 a useless bastard you are how many sins
33:27 you have on your conscience if you're
33:29 fortunate there'll be a few of your
33:30 adventures come to mind where you think
33:34 well you know I didn't do so bad then
33:37 you know maybe there's something to me
33:40 and so what what do people remember when
33:42 they have those memories they remember
33:43 the times when they stepped outside of
33:45 their narrow cells and took on some
33:47 bloody responsibility at least for
33:50 themselves and then maybe for someone
33:51 else too
33:54 and then maybe for a lot of other people
33:57 and so if you tell young man look you're
34:00 going to find the meaning in your life
34:03 by adopting
34:07 by adopting maximal responsibility right
34:08 that's going to be extremely difficult
34:11 because you're so bloody useless you
34:13 can't even get your own house in order
34:15 and you're and you're going to be called
34:16 upon not only to get your house in order
34:19 but to do that well enough so some woman
34:20 can stand having you around for more
34:23 than like 15 minutes in the back of a car
34:23 car
34:25 and then maybe you're going to have to
34:27 do it so that you could be a good father
34:29 to a family and a pillar of the
34:31 community and that's not just empty
34:34 words like if you do that
34:37 nobly there'll be something to you and
34:39 then when the storms come
34:42 you won't be blown over by the first
34:45 four foot wave and young men think
34:48 huh mean I could be something that
34:50 wasn't blown over by the first four foot wave
34:52 wave
34:54 they think oh well that's that's
34:55 that's
34:58 inspiring maybe that's worth doing a
35:00 little work towards it on the off chance
35:02 it might be true
35:05 and the thing about it is it is true
35:08 so it's not that difficult once you
35:10 understand it to make a case for it it's
35:13 true and it's also true that
35:15 you grow in proportion to the weight you
35:18 take on voluntarily and it's also true
35:20 that we have no idea what the upper
35:22 limit to that is right so you know you
35:24 you've met remarkable people in your life
35:25 life
35:27 people can do remarkable things and
35:30 they're inevitably people who take who
35:32 took on remarkable burdens and because
35:33 they did that
35:36 their development was forced by
35:38 necessity they were forced by necessity
35:42 to grow beyond what they were and who
35:44 knows what the limit to that is
35:46 people uh so I something I see in the
35:48 college business uh our College
35:51 Hillsdale College has got about the same
35:53 number of boys and girls few more boys
35:55 and they come from a pool of applicants
35:57 that are equal size and equal
35:59 qualification almost nobody has that
36:02 right and the boys do just about as well
36:04 as the girls although they do get in
36:07 contests doing things like throwing deer
36:08 urine on each other and stuff they've
36:09 done that
36:11 but some of the best boys I've ever met
36:12 have done that as a matter of fact
36:14 they're in the Marine Corps now stupid
36:17 boys and they and and the thing is
36:20 people will say how are you successful
36:22 with boys
36:24 and I say we treat them like boys
36:26 you know they want to be treated like
36:30 boys they and and girls women we've
36:32 always had boys and girls here women and
36:34 men here right and they've always done
36:36 well and their intellectual capacities
36:38 are you know they're the same kind of thing
36:39 thing
36:44 and their physical uh paths are not the
36:47 same and they can wish them the same if
36:49 they want to but
36:52 they don't they don't really they don't
36:54 I mean I you know what I find is and and
36:56 you know
36:59 uh I have two daughters uh you have one
37:01 I think and she's your daughter is like
37:04 my daughters very tough
37:06 very assertive
37:09 uh very womanly you see and
37:11 so in other words the the classic
37:13 account is
37:16 they're good at being what they are
37:18 and that's a service you know human
37:21 above all but also male or female and
37:24 that's a service that burden you're
37:25 talking about
37:28 the first burden everyone carries is how
37:30 do you become a good one of these
37:36 and by if by thinking it that's all as
37:38 you say that's no burden
37:40 so no satisfaction uh
37:41 uh
37:43 I think
37:45 predict the future for me a little bit
37:47 what's what's gonna happen
37:49 seems to me things are coming to a point
37:52 do you think so
37:53 yeah well I think things have always
37:55 been coming to a point
37:58 but they're coming to a point way faster
38:01 and I mean that's partly a consequence of
38:02 of
38:04 the technological Revolution I mean we
38:06 know that
38:08 well we have Moore's Law right computing
38:10 power doubles every 18 months
38:13 it's like no no you don't understand
38:16 computing power doubles every 18 months
38:19 that's not some casual phrase that's an
38:21 absolute bloody revolution in every
38:23 possible Direction and it's not just
38:25 computing power it's storage power and
38:27 there's all sorts of doubling State
38:29 taking place and we're now at the point
38:31 in in the course of technological
38:34 progress where those doublings are
38:36 happening multiple times within the span
38:38 of a single life and so it's pretty
38:40 obvious and that means the ancient
38:42 archetypal battles are accelerating
38:45 that's exactly what it means the battles
38:47 between good and evil is accelerating
38:49 and it's always been there it's the
38:51 apocalypse nigh it's like well it's
38:53 always been nigh but it might be a
38:55 little more nigh than it has been in the
38:57 past and you've been talking about
38:59 artificial intelligence and recently I
39:02 have become more concerned about that uh
39:04 what what are your concerns and what are
39:06 your hopes for it well I suppose my
39:07 fundamental concern is that we'll
39:10 automate a super intelligent tyranny
39:11 right and I mean that's not a concern
39:13 that's limited to me that's the that's
39:16 the motif of endless numbers of Science
39:19 Fiction dystopias and you know science
39:21 fiction is where you where Engineers
39:24 dream right and sometimes it's where
39:27 they have their nightmares and Engineers
39:30 are notoriously atheistic and so they
39:32 turn to worship of Star Wars for example
39:34 as an alternative but they're nightmares
39:38 and dreams are in the popular culture in
39:40 popular imagination and dystopian
39:42 science fiction is the nightmare of
39:43 Engineers and
39:45 the nightmare of Tower of Babel building
39:47 Engineers is that we'll automate a super
39:50 intelligent tyranny
39:52 the Chinese or hell-bent on doing that
39:54 they're doing it at the moment could we
39:58 do it here absolutely are we yeah yeah
40:00 will it will will that
40:04 dominate we'll see you know my sense and
40:06 I learned a fair bit of this from Jung
40:08 by the way you know what one of the
40:10 things I learned from Jung was that deeply
40:12 deeply
40:15 was that salvation Redemption was an
40:17 individual Enterprise which is why I'm a
40:18 psychologist and not a politician
40:20 because I believe that to be true I
40:22 think that
40:23 hell is
40:25 what would you say kept at Bay one
40:27 person at a time and I do believe that
40:28 people have
40:32 a Divine Destiny let's say and
40:35 one of the proper elements of our divine
40:37 Destiny is to keep hell at Bay and you
40:39 do that by
40:42 you do that as a consequence of your
40:44 choices as an individual I also believe
40:46 that every single individual is
40:48 is in that
40:51 up to their necks you know Dostoevsky
40:52 said something very strange at one point
40:54 he said every man is responsible not
40:57 only for everything he does but for
40:59 everyone everyone else does and of
41:01 course that's insane right in that crazy
41:06 Dostoevsky way that is more sane that
41:08 Insanity that's more sane than sanity
41:11 that's Dostoevsky in a nutshell and I
41:12 think there's something true about it is
41:15 that we each have an archetypal Destiny
41:17 and the work the fate of the world rests
41:19 on each person's shoulders like
41:21 genuinely and when I'm traveling around
41:23 the world talking to people I'm trying
41:25 to tell them that it's like no no you
41:29 don't understand this is up to you now I
41:30 don't understand how it can be up to you
41:33 because it's also up to me and I don't
41:35 exactly see how it can be equally and
41:38 finally up to both of us but that's okay
41:40 there's lots of things about the world I
41:42 don't understand and I suppose being
41:45 what would you say touched by a spark of
41:47 divinity which is I suppose what
41:49 characterizes us each of us Bears an
41:51 infinite responsibility
41:54 and people need to know that and that
41:56 it's this is no game
41:58 so you have to carry the burden for more
42:00 than your own sake
42:03 well well it it
42:05 you're you're in this this you're into
42:07 your sake is indistinguishable from the
42:09 sake of the totality see the Buddha
42:13 figured this out right because Buddha
42:16 uh what would you say he he he achieved
42:18 Enlightenment under the bow tree he was
42:21 in Nirvana he was in paradise and he
42:23 could stay there that was on the table
42:25 and that's a hell of an offer to be able
42:27 to stay in paradise and he rejected it
42:29 and the reason he rejected it was
42:31 because it was in his estimation and he
42:32 prepared us that it didn't include
42:35 everyone wasn't the real paradise and so
42:37 he left Nirvana to come back to earth so
42:40 to speak to serve as a teacher to drag
42:42 everyone else along on the road to
42:45 Nirvana and that's
42:47 well that's that's that's correct is
42:50 that that that
42:54 it's correct in that there in the final
42:57 analysis there is no distinction between
42:58 you and someone else
43:01 it's a terrible thing to contemplate
43:02 they're the same thing
43:04 and that's why you're supposed to love
43:06 your enemy I suppose and and what does
43:08 that mean to love your enemy well first
43:10 of all it might mean to begin with to
43:11 hope that he wouldn't have to be an
43:13 enemy because why not have a friend but
43:15 it's even more than that is that to the
43:17 degree that it's possible your actions
43:19 even in the presence of your enemy
43:21 should be devoted towards the Redemption
43:23 of your enemy
43:24 that would be better for you and for
43:27 them I mean if you're good and your
43:28 enemy is not good
43:31 you'd be right to oppose them
43:34 for the sake of the good and those who
43:37 represent it but well you redeem what
43:38 you can redeem and you reject the rest
43:40 right and that's the separation of the
43:42 wheat from the chaff that's it well I
43:44 learned something a while back about
43:47 there's this idea at the end of Genesis
43:49 when God throws Adam and Eve out of
43:52 paradise he sets these cherubs up to
43:54 guard the gates of paradise and their
43:56 monstrous forms these cherubs and they
43:58 hold swords that are on fire that turn
44:00 every which way it's a very horrifying
44:03 image and what does it mean it means
44:06 that well a sword cuts and Cleaves and
44:08 butchers and kills but a sword can be
44:10 used to carve so you can think about a
44:12 sword as an Implement that separates the
44:14 wheat from the chaff and a burning sword
44:16 well that's even worse right because it
44:19 burns the dead wood away and so a burn a
44:22 flaming sword is a sword that cuts all
44:25 that isn't necessary away and burns all
44:27 the Deadwood off and of course that's
44:30 the case because everything unworthy has
44:33 to be cut away in order for it Paradise
44:36 by definition and all dead wood has to
44:38 be burned away
44:40 before the living Essence can enter
44:42 Paradise that's another way of thinking
44:46 about it and if you're 99 Deadwood and
44:48 pathology it isn't obvious that the
44:50 encounter with the Flaming sword that
44:52 turns every which way won't just do you in
44:53 in
44:56 and that's that's the issue of evil in
44:58 some regard
45:00 you want to redeem what can be redeemed
45:02 but you need to reject what's truly
45:05 Serpentine and that's Eve's sin by the
45:07 way she doesn't do that she hearkens to
45:09 the serpent itself and that's a
45:12 narcissism of compassion that's her sin
45:14 it's a pride of compassion my womanly
45:16 Embrace is such that all things can be
45:19 classed by breast including the
45:21 poisonous serpent it's like well yeah
45:24 maybe maybe not including the poisonous serpent
45:25 serpent
45:27 right and I see that playing out in the
45:29 world now because we have this epidemic
45:31 of narcissistic compassion where
45:34 everything can be in invited to the table
45:34 table
45:37 it's like well maybe not everything
45:39 everything
45:41 right right and maybe there's only a
45:45 small remnant of what is truly hellish
45:46 hellish
45:49 that has to be rejected
45:51 that there's no hope of redeeming I mean
45:53 this is an ancient theological issue
45:55 right but
45:57 this was played out quite recently in
45:59 the case of Nikola sturgeon right
46:01 because sturgeon in the Scottish prime
46:03 minister you know she famously
46:05 proclaimed that well any man who says
46:06 he's a woman
46:08 is a woman
46:10 it's like I'm so compassionate it's like
46:12 people can do whatever they want it's like
46:13 like
46:15 any man eh
46:16 how about
46:20 Psychopathic serialist serial killing
46:23 sadistic rapists how about them
46:25 well when she was asked that question
46:28 which she was she had to hand wave
46:30 partly because for someone like her no
46:33 one like that exists not really
46:35 but the problem is is that people like
46:38 that do exist or Spirits like that exist
46:40 so there's an immediate thing we see
46:42 here coming from artificial intelligence
46:43 and it's
46:46 it can do a passable job writing a term
46:49 paper we can stop that here we have an
46:51 honor code and most most kids won't do
46:53 it almost all and if they do it's not
46:55 too you know eventually it'll be
46:57 indistinguishable I'm told oh yes but
47:00 it's there already but you know oral
47:02 exams but here's what I'm worried about
47:05 uh uh this is the the chairman of
47:06 Microsoft who I used to think was a
47:08 pretty good guy he proclaims well he's
47:10 not going to write your final it's going
47:12 to write your draft but writing your
47:14 draft that's where you do most of the
47:17 learning that's where you read all the
47:19 stuff that surrounds your subject and
47:20 decide what's relevant yeah yeah yeah
47:23 and that means that and it goes back to
47:25 something you've taught me and that is
47:28 if you can't write a draft of a paper or
47:30 write your own paper
47:32 you become a well that's see
47:34 that's the fundamental issue in the
47:35 argument it's it's
47:37 because you could say well why not just
47:40 let if your point is the degree why not
47:42 just let AI write your paper and and
47:44 hand it in and get your a and it's
47:49 I think it was Alfred North Whitehead
47:53 who said this is very very wise thing
47:57 you think so that your thoughts can die
47:59 instead of you
48:01 okay now this is biologically true this
48:03 is what makes human beings different
48:04 from all other creatures
48:07 right maybe this is the spark of God in
48:11 some sense tied to the biology so the
48:12 prefrontal cortex which is the part of
48:15 the brain that generates abstractions
48:17 grew out of the motor cortex which is
48:18 the part of the brain that enables you
48:21 to voluntarily sequence your actions so
48:24 what thought is thought is the space in
48:26 which you create avatars of action
48:28 right so what a thought we think because
48:31 we're materialist atheists and we think
48:32 we're scientists we think that a thought
48:35 is a description of the objective nature
48:37 of the world and that was isn't what a
48:40 thought is a thought is a micro
48:44 it's a microcosmic avatar of you
48:46 that's what a thought is and if it's a
48:48 stupid thought
48:50 if then you could act it out you could
48:52 embody that Avatar and then it would
48:53 become you
48:56 but if it's if it's a faulty Avatar and
48:57 you act it out
48:59 then you'll die
49:01 or worse because there are worse things
49:03 than dying you'll end up in something
49:04 like hell
49:06 and so
49:09 why think so that you can generate
49:13 virtual selves
49:15 then why think critically so you can
49:18 kill off the idiot virtual selves before
49:21 you enact them why do that so you don't
49:25 die or end up in hell that's why so why
49:27 should you think so you don't die and
49:30 end up or end up in Hell how do you
49:32 learn to think well not by having AI
49:35 write your damn papers the reason you're
49:36 learning to write is because there's no
49:38 difference between writing and thinking
49:39 and the reason you're learning to think
49:42 is so that you don't not only so that
49:44 you don't fall into a pit but so that
49:47 you don't pull everyone you love Kicking
49:50 and Screaming into the pit with you and
49:52 so you have cheat
49:56 cheat go ahead see what happens
49:58 so so what you do with a liberal arts
50:00 education which you do very well here is
50:01 you say
50:03 don't cheat because you'll put your
50:06 Immortal soul in danger and people say
50:07 well I don't believe in that so that's like
50:08 like
50:10 go right ahead
50:13 take your chances you know you
50:15 make the presumption that you can
50:17 manipulate the World by lying and
50:20 cheating go out there and enact that and
50:22 watch what happens
50:23 you know we're having an argument about
50:26 your culture in our culture about what's
50:28 true it's a deep argument
50:30 the scientists say well objective truth
50:33 is true but that's problematic because
50:35 objective truth gives us no direction
50:37 and the postmodernists say well there's
50:39 no overarching meta-narrative and
50:41 everything is relative and they do that
50:44 to justify their Hedonism and the truth
50:47 of the matter is we don't know how to
50:50 define what's real and most of us are
50:52 materialists the material world is
50:53 what's real
50:55 here's a different proposition
50:57 proposition
51:00 what's real leads you away from hell
51:01 now that's actually a definition right
51:05 it's a it's a proposition that your life
51:08 will be conducted most fully
51:10 fully
51:12 if you abide by the dictum that what's
51:14 real is what leads you away from hell
51:16 and you might say well why would you
51:19 assume that hell is real and I would say
51:21 if you were there you'd think it was real
51:23 real
51:26 right so and I don't really know what to
51:27 make of that metaphysically I mean I
51:29 believe it's true and I've believed it
51:31 for a very long time because I read a
51:33 lot of literature about hell and you
51:36 think well hell isn't real it's like
51:39 read about unit 731.
51:41 that was a that was a Japanese medical
51:44 unit in China you read about Unit 731
51:46 and I would recommend by the way for
51:47 those of you who are watching or
51:50 listening that you don't do this because
51:52 you'll regret it if you do you read
51:55 about Unit 731 and then come and tell me
51:57 you don't believe hell is real
51:59 if you read enough about
52:02 atrocity and totalitarian catastrophe
52:05 you will absolutely walk away from that
52:07 thinking that hell is real and then if
52:09 you have any sense you'll think well
52:10 whatever I'm going to do in my life I'm
52:12 going to do whatever takes me as far
52:15 away as from that as I can possibly get
52:17 you know when when this political
52:19 Scandal blew up around me in Canada
52:20 people come up to me and they say this
52:23 they say you're so brave and I think you
52:25 don't understand the difference between
52:27 you and me is I know what to be properly
52:28 afraid of
52:30 right and I know that
52:33 when the cat gets your tongue you will
52:36 end up in hell you lose control of that
52:38 logos right because that's your capacity
52:40 for voluntary speech voluntary thought
52:43 you lose that link with the logos
52:46 you are headed for hell and that is
52:48 definitely worse than death how many
52:50 could you estimate how many hours have
52:53 you spent in private therapeutic
52:55 counseling I mean doing counseling doing
53:02 fifteen thousand dollars I say that's
53:04 seven might be more than that seven full
53:07 working years and uh
53:10 eight but uh here's one that's a that's
53:12 a conservative estimate that's why I
53:15 asked the question was when you talk like
53:16 like
53:18 uh academics have a good education which
53:20 I fancy I do are pretty good at
53:23 understanding the implications of prop
53:28 propositions you know like uh if if you
53:29 said that we're material beings if we
53:31 were purely material beings of course we
53:33 couldn't know it dogs don't know that
53:36 they're dogs uh but so we we're good at
53:38 things like that right
53:41 you're good at describing the
53:43 consequences as they appear in
53:46 individuals and it's very dramatic and
53:49 what is this is one thing you know
53:51 it's in in many ways it's terrifying to
53:53 be a therapist and there's a variety of
53:55 reasons for that I mean one of the
53:56 things you learn
53:57 if you're
54:00 if you're a therapist is that
54:01 you really learned something about the
54:04 intrinsic worth of people like some of
54:06 the best people I met in my therapeutic
54:08 practice the best people morally were
54:10 people who were the mo who were on the surface
54:15 they have nothing going for them no
54:17 nothing worldly going for them they
54:18 weren't attractive they weren't
54:20 intelligent they weren't accomplished
54:22 they weren't popular in fact they were
54:24 often friendless they often had
54:27 devastated families they had terrible
54:29 developmental histories
54:31 they just had devastated lives and yet
54:33 there was still a core of ethical
54:35 goodness to them that was
54:36 stunning under the circumstances
54:40 miraculous and so you really
54:42 that really takes you back to see that
54:44 that can happen right to see that sent
54:46 that essential nobility of the human spirit
54:48 spirit
54:50 um and so so that's a terrifying thing
54:53 to see and then
54:55 and that that goodness can shine through
54:58 in places that just look dark and and
55:00 that no one is attending to and
55:04 the next thing you learn is don't impose
55:05 impose
55:08 your Notions of
55:11 someone's Destiny on them you do not
55:13 know how that person's life should
55:16 unfold you're there to help them think
55:19 that through you are not there to give
55:20 them advice
55:22 that's it's a theft giving someone
55:24 advice especially if your therapist is
55:26 theft because
55:29 it's theft because if they succeed well
55:32 then it's your success and it's corrupt
55:34 theft because if they fail they bear the
55:38 consequences and you don't so so that's
55:41 terrifying and then
55:43 the other thing I learned that was
55:45 terrifying was I never saw anyone in my
55:47 therapeutic practice ever get away with
55:49 anything even once
55:51 like you know there's that old idea that
55:53 God has a book and and everything you do
55:55 is written down it's like that's not
55:56 just an idea
55:59 you get away with nothing and of course
56:00 it makes sense it's like
56:04 reality is real and you distort and bend
56:08 it at your peril and you may produce a
56:11 riff temporarily but that will snap
56:14 closed on you and you may not even
56:17 notice the connection between your
56:19 initial sin failure to meet the target
56:22 to hit the target and the consequences
56:24 of that but the consequences are
56:27 inevitable and it's even worse than that
56:28 because not only are they inevitable
56:30 they tend to multiply
56:33 and so all of that to to the degree that
56:35 I've been capable has scared me straight
56:37 let's say it's like no I'm not going
56:39 down that path
56:41 and so and you learn to as a therapist
56:45 you learn the ancient truth that
56:47 the truth is Redemptive right and this
56:49 is this is another of the Great
56:51 accomplishments of Freud because Freud
56:54 shed new light on the logos in some ways
56:56 right because Freud understood that
56:59 true speech heals
57:02 right I mean that's his his entire
57:05 therapeutic approach is bring people in
57:07 and don't
57:09 disturb them when they're trying to tell
57:11 you something let them say anything
57:13 absolutely and that's what he told his
57:15 clients too is like say whatever comes
57:19 to your mind right let no matter how off
57:22 color off-putting embarrassing shameful
57:26 aggressive sexual
57:28 find out who you are that's the first
57:31 draft lay yourself out on the table and
57:32 while he had them lay themselves out on
57:34 a couch he hid from his clients so they
57:36 couldn't he was afraid that if they saw
57:39 his face they would censor themselves by
57:41 watching his emotional reactions so he
57:44 sat off to the side of his clients so
57:45 they could just
57:48 say what they had to say with no
57:51 interference and
57:53 you know this because you're an educator but
57:55 but
57:58 people cannot
58:00 organize themselves and come to who they
58:03 are without laying themselves out and
58:04 they can't lay themselves out without
58:08 thinking or talking most people think by
58:10 talking in fact you learn to think by talking
58:11 talking
58:14 you can't talk if no one listens most
58:16 people most people have no one to listen
58:21 to them yeah if so you know education is
58:23 a little bit different than therapy but
58:25 sometimes not and one way it's different is
58:27 is
58:31 now education is a common project
58:33 that people share
58:36 and each has to do his part or he won't
58:39 get any benefit from it but better
58:43 together as you say and so around here I
58:45 there's a we have a lot of psychological
58:47 counseling here when we but also the
58:50 kids cancel each other and that's and
58:52 that's a different thing because
58:54 they're in the same boat they're trying
58:56 to get the same thing done they want to
59:00 understand the most important things
59:02 and that's a form of therapy actually
59:04 when you think about it because well
59:06 actually therapy is a form of that yeah
59:09 right right because yeah sure sure I
59:10 mean the therapeutic Endeavor is dialogue
59:12 dialogue
59:14 right and it's
59:17 I guess the advantage if you have a good
59:19 therapist which is very rare in becoming
59:21 more and more difficult as it becomes
59:23 illegal to be a good therapist which it
59:25 already is by the way
59:26 um because it's now illegal to tell your
59:29 clients what you think and so that's the
59:30 end of that Enterprise because that's
59:33 all there was to it so but
59:36 therapy is
59:39 it's it's dialogue in search it's dialogue
59:41 dialogue
59:43 look it's a religious Enterprise it's
59:45 motivated by love
59:48 what's our aim here therapeuticate to
59:51 make things better why because we think
59:54 it's worthy it's a worthy Enterprise to
59:55 make things better that's the
59:58 proclamation of love right love aims at
60:01 making things better love aims at making the world more abundant it aims at
60:03 the world more abundant it aims at reducing unnecessary suffering right
60:05 reducing unnecessary suffering right it's an enobling Enterprise love and so
60:08 it's an enobling Enterprise love and so the therapeutic process aims at love and
60:11 the therapeutic process aims at love and uses truth and that's a religious
60:13 uses truth and that's a religious Enterprise it's a logos Enterprise it's
60:15 Enterprise it's a logos Enterprise it's a dialogical Enterprise and it's a form
60:18 a dialogical Enterprise and it's a form of secularized religious practice so I
60:21 of secularized religious practice so I have one last question
60:23 have one last question uh I know you're doing things you're you
60:25 uh I know you're doing things you're you go all over the world you got
60:27 go all over the world you got friends and fans everywhere you started
60:30 friends and fans everywhere you started in some kind of organization
60:32 in some kind of organization uh
60:34 uh my last question is how are you going to
60:36 my last question is how are you going to save the world
60:37 save the world one person at a time
60:40 one person at a time right that's always how it's happened
60:41 right that's always how it's happened you know what's the leftist Mantra the
60:44 you know what's the leftist Mantra the Long March through the institutions well
60:46 Long March through the institutions well how do you combat that with the longer
60:49 how do you combat that with the longer March through the individuals
60:51 March through the individuals right there's the rest of it's an
60:54 right there's the rest of it's an illusion in in a way
60:56 illusion in in a way there are individuals
60:59 there are individuals right that's where the rubber hits the
61:01 right that's where the rubber hits the road
61:02 road individuals suffer
61:04 individuals suffer individuals bear responsibility
61:06 individuals bear responsibility right one of the
61:08 right one of the one of the
61:10 one of the gifts I suppose that
61:13 gifts I suppose that the biblical Corpus gave to the UK the
61:16 the biblical Corpus gave to the UK the UK transformed into Political wisdom and
61:19 UK transformed into Political wisdom and transmitted to the U.S was the
61:21 transmitted to the U.S was the proposition that the individual was the
61:23 proposition that the individual was the proper unit of analysis the fundamental
61:26 proper unit of analysis the fundamental unit of analysis and I believe that
61:28 unit of analysis and I believe that that's the case which is why I'm a
61:29 that's the case which is why I'm a psychologist as I said and not a not a
61:31 psychologist as I said and not a not a sociologist or a or a political
61:34 sociologist or a or a political operative it's it's the the road it's
61:38 operative it's it's the the road it's it's always been the case that the route
61:40 it's always been the case that the route to heaven and Away From Hell
61:43 to heaven and Away From Hell is the root of the individual soul
61:46 is the root of the individual soul and I I believe that that's it's
61:48 and I I believe that that's it's theologically true it's metaphysically
61:50 theologically true it's metaphysically true it's philosophically true I also
61:53 true it's philosophically true I also believe that it's
61:55 believe that it's materially true right insofar as
61:58 materially true right insofar as that sort of Truth can be instantiated
62:00 that sort of Truth can be instantiated materially it's true at every level
62:02 materially it's true at every level simultaneously
62:03 simultaneously in agreeing with that I will say
62:06 in agreeing with that I will say all of the greatest philosopher
62:09 all of the greatest philosopher political philosophers and all of the
62:10 political philosophers and all of the greatest greatest Statesmen thought
62:12 greatest greatest Statesmen thought precisely that
62:14 precisely that the purpose of the nation or the regime
62:17 the purpose of the nation or the regime is the happiness of its people
62:20 is the happiness of its people and they come together to help make it
62:22 and they come together to help make it but each has to make his own and that
62:25 but each has to make his own and that that hey I think that's a very beautiful
62:27 that hey I think that's a very beautiful way that's how the founders of America
62:28 way that's how the founders of America organized the country and
62:31 organized the country and uh my own view is
62:34 uh my own view is beautiful things cannot abidingly lose
62:37 beautiful things cannot abidingly lose their luster and I will say that in our
62:40 their luster and I will say that in our time which is of desperate time
62:42 time which is of desperate time your success and influence is one of the
62:45 your success and influence is one of the Key signs that I'm right about that
62:47 Key signs that I'm right about that thank you for being with me thank you
62:50 thank you for being with me thank you sir it's always a pleasure to be at
62:51 sir it's always a pleasure to be at Hillsdale and to see you