Hang tight while we fetch the video data and transcripts. This only takes a moment.
Connecting to YouTube player…
Fetching transcript data…
We’ll display the transcript, summary, and all view options as soon as everything loads.
Next steps
Loading transcript tools…
Learning about the Executive Director for Giving, Volunteering and Voice role | Internal Comms | YouTubeToText
YouTube Transcript: Learning about the Executive Director for Giving, Volunteering and Voice role
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Video Summary
Summary
Core Theme
The Stroke Association is recruiting for a new Executive Director of Giving, Volunteering, and Voice to drive a strategic shift towards a more supporter-centric model, aiming to deepen engagement and increase impact by valuing diverse contributions beyond just financial donations.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
Hello everyone. Thank you so much for
joining us today um to discuss our brand
new and very exciting role for our new
executive director for giving,
volunteering and voice.
You can see on the slide that um we are
going to do a Q&A session for this. So
please submit all of your questions in
the Q&A tab. Please do tick the
anonymous box. Um this is just to
protect your identity. And if you feel a
bit more comfortable, please feel free
to change your name to your initials or
anything you like. This session will be
recorded, so please do feel free to have
a check over it. Um, any questions that
we don't get to answer today, we will go
through them. Um, and we will upload
these along with the recording to our
recruitment site for you. So, you don't
need to panic if your question doesn't
get answered or anything like that.
Please do refrain from meing me
privately. Um, this is just because I
probably will not see your question
unfortunately. Um, so we do want to make
sure that all of the questions go to the
same space so that there's a higher
chance for you to have your question
answered. Um, I am joined today by our
chief executive Juliet Bouver and our
executive director of people Chris
Vennison. They are going to go through
what this exciting period of growth is
for the stroke association and the
transformation that we are making. We
will go through and explore what it's
like to lead with purpose to inspire
connection and to just shape
transformational growth particularly
through this um executive director role.
So I will now hand over to you Chris and
Juliet to tell everyone more about this
really exciting opportunity.
>> Great. Thank you very much Rachel. So um
why don't I just very briefly introduce
myself and then Chris you can do the
same. So I'm Juliet. I'm chief executive
of the stroke association. I've been in
this role for just over nine years. I
can honestly say it's the best job I've
ever had. Stroke is a cause that is so
worth advocating for. Um and I feel
incredibly lucky uh to have a cause that
I feel so passionate about and I've
spent most of my career um in the
voluntary sector in health and care
charities and before the stroke
association I was at McMillan cancer
support for 16 years. So Chris,
>> hi everybody. Yes, I'm Chris Wson. I'm
exec director of people. So I've got the
privilege of leading the people team but
also I'm a corporate executive uh
director as well. So, I'm involved in
all sorts of different things in the
charity and you'll probably hear a
little bit that about that in the coming
uh 60 minutes or so. Uh I've been with
the charity for uh 26 years. So, that
probably proves one thing. That's a
great charity uh to give my career to uh
and for the last nine years being uh had
the real privilege of working under
Juliet as our CEO. So, uh that's a
little bit about me.
So Juliet, do you think we should get started?
started?
>> I think we should.
>> So um do you want to just start by
talking a little bit about why you've
designed this role to include giving,
volunteering and voice?
>> Yeah. So um I mean we know that those
who support us are really close to the
cause of stroke and they feel deeply
committed to both the cause of stroke
and our charity. And we all the time we
receive lots of great feedback from
supporters who do give us time, voice,
and money about what it means to them to
give and the value of the support that
they receive from us. Um, but we're only
engaging a proportion of the 22 million
people in the UK with a proximity to
stroke. And what we want to do is to
move away from what is primarily a
productdriven approach to an approach
that really puts supporters at the heart
of what we do where we're seeing
supporters as a whole person and where
we're designing truly personalized and
integrated customer journeys where we
deeply understand and connect to
people's individual motivations.
And why do we want to do that? Well, we
know that this relationshipdriven
approach to supporter engagement and a
focus on mutual two-way benefits for
both our supporters and stroke is what
lays the ground for long-term growth and
impact. Now, we've called this role
executive director of giving,
volunteering, and voice. And internally,
we've shortened that to contribute
because we want everyone's contribution
to count. Now contribute is one of the
four systems through which we now
describe and organize our work and the
other three systems
our stroke support influencing and
underpin which is basically all the
things that we do to make the stroke
association safe, legal, ethical and responsible.
responsible.
And we're using the term system to
describe our work because we're drawing
on the approach of systems thinking. And
that's in order to make sure that we
really pay attention to complexity and
the interconnected nature of our work.
And each of our systems are described
from the perspective of the customer.
And they describe a core purpose. And
that's the core purpose against which we
want all of our activities in that
system to align. And they also describe
the capabilities we need. In other
words, the things that we need to be
great at to deliver on that purpose.
And we know that when we put ourselves
in the shoes of our supporters who want
to support us and the cause of stroke,
it's clear that they want real
flexibility to contribute in a variety
of different ways and often in more than
one way. So it might be by fundraising
for a challenge or setting up a direct
debit. We know that we want to make that
giving really easy
and we want people to be able to give
time at the same time each week or
simply show up uh when they can. And
then adding their voice to our
involvement work and advocacy campaigns
with their story is also really
important. Or it might mean getting
stuck into co-designing solutions and
standing alongside us as we demand
change for stroke survivors.
So whilst fundraising activity is vital
because we absolutely do need to raise
money to fund and grow our work, putting
our supporters first means enabling them
to contribute in the ways that work best
for them and making sure that they
really do experience the benefits of
giving and that's what's helped to shape
the creation of this new role which is
all about stewarding our contribute system.
system.
>> Thanks Julia that's great context. So
this is exciting, right? Uh so where are
the opportunities for improvement, do
you think?
>> Yeah, I mean there are so many
opportunities for improvement and I
think probably Chris the best way for me
to do it is to go through the three um
ways in which we want people to give
contributions. So if I start off on
giving money now, we absolutely know
that there's headroom in our
fundraising. Now our legacy income is
incredibly strong and it continues to
perform well for us. And in the nine
years that I've been at the stroke
association, our legacy pipeline has
gone from around 7 million to a record
19 million. And we now have a steady
stream of new legacy pledges and
legours. Now our mass engagement and
high value income streams are growing,
which is really good news, but more
slowly than we'd like. And some of the
things that are holding us back include
inadequate data, an over reliance on
manual processes,
a large a lack of large compelling
ambitious fundraising propositions which
we can co-create with highv value donors
and corporates and team targets that
tend to hold us back from a whole
organization collaborative effort. Now,
we are working with an external agency
called Public Digital to lay the
foundations around digital and data so
that we can connect and develop
long-term relationships with our
supporters. And we're currently
undertaking a fundraising product
portfolio with a view to identifying how
we can best meet supporter preferences
and motivations, including understanding
the mutual benefit, the best return on
investment, and the opportunities for innovation.
innovation.
We're about to launch a new legacy
proposition and we've done some really
exciting research with current and
potential supporters which identifies as
much appetite for donating for stroke
support, our core beneficiary offer, as
it does for research, which is where
we've placed more focus historically.
And we're now updating our research
strategy to enable more and higher value
research-driven fundraising
propositions. So, lots of opportunities
to go for around income generation and
income growth. Now, on volunteering,
which is giving time, we've got over a
thousand volunteers who give their time
to help us and the stroke community and
surveys indicate that their engagement
levels are high. Encouragingly, we've
recently done some research that tells
us that those with a proximity to stroke
are significantly more likely to want to
volunteer at the stroke associations.
Our volunteers who are stroke survivors
or carers have told us that volunteering
can be really transformational for them.
It can help contribute to their recovery
after the initial devastation of stroke,
helping them develop their confidence
and sense of purpose.
So some of the questions that we're
asking ourselves which we'd like this
new executive director to address are
how do we engage more of the 22 million
people in the UK with a proximity to
stroke who might want to volunteer for
us? How do we create easy flexible
volunteering opportunities that fit
around people's lives but still meet
their individual motivations?
And how do we create a culture across
the whole stroke association and create
the right capacity, processes and
systems so that we can able so that we
can enable volunteers to have a great
experience and give of their best.
Now finally on voice we do know that
many people affected by stroke want to
tell their stories and when they do so
it's incredibly powerful. It really
helps people to understand and engage
with the devastation of stroke but also
the optimistic message about recovery
potential. Now we believe that providing
more opportunities for people to tell
their stories is going to be an
important way of elevating the cause of
stroke in public and politicians minds
and will hopefully help to make stroke
the priority it needs to be. And
excitingly, we're working towards a
campaign which will start next autumn.
That's autumn 2026 when we're going to
be telling the untold story of stroke
and hopefully starting to inspire the
So that's enough of me, Chris.
So I'm going to turn the conversation
round to you for a bit. So Chris, um,
what are we looking for in this role?
So we're looking for somebody who has a
marketing mindset to help us put
customer engagement and experience at
heart of our charity. We also want
somebody who can help us develop a sport
supporter culture to ensure that our
supporter journeys are designed in a way
that really truly engages so they feel
understood, valued and able to give
their best possible contribution.
Uh we currently give priority to
supporters. You've talked a little bit
about this Juliet in particularly in
relation to giving money but we also
want to balance this up for somebody who
wants to give a greater voice to stroke
and also to give their time through
volunteering. Um both of which are
vitally important to our work. We want
to we want somebody who can find bold
new ways to connect people to our cause
and who braces embraces things uh
differently. So a creative view and mind
of doing things. So you'll bring a deep
appreciation of supporter journeys from
acquisition to on boarding and retention
and lead a culture that celebrates
giving in all forms.
We also want somebody who can un who
understands the power of digital and
data practices so we can deliver more
personalized journeys at scale and that
and the respond to individual
preferences and motivations.
Um the successful candidate will have a
deep experience in inspiring giving
whether that's from a fundraising,
marketing or sales background with the
ability to apply those skills and help
the charity succeed. And along with your
business acumen, you'll be able to spot
opportunities and build a strong
balanced portfolio portfolio that helps
us grow our impact with this with
sustainability and growing income streams.
streams.
And quite importantly, you'll need to
lead in a relational way because we know
that leadership style, this leadership
style in the charity really matters. Uh
so even more than your own technical
capability that you will bring. So
finally, you'll combine vision, courage,
focus, humility in your leadership style
to unleash the potential of our charity
and talented teams.
So Julia, I mentioned a little bit about
the importance of relational leadership
and as know we've been working on this
in terms of uh for the last 18 months
actually in terms of a cultural shift in
our leadership. So do you want to expand
on what that looks like for us?
>> Yeah, happy to Chris. I mean I'll be
honest with everybody. I mean, it's a
it's a big change um for the whole
charity and one that we're still working
on, but as Chris said, we're on a
journey and we're wanting to become a
more relational organization,
moving away from one that has
traditionally been quite industrial and
by industrial we mean quite traditional,
top down with decisions made at the top
and implemented below. Um, so a
traditional approach kind of delivers
change through a more command and
control or predict and control style approach.
approach.
So we're wanting to move away from that
to a culture and a leadership style
that's more relational. So, we're
setting out to be more progressive and
agile as an organization
where power is distributed across the
organization and where decisions are
made closer to the work where we aren't
trying to plan and predict everything
that might happen over the year, but
where we're becoming really good at
learning in and through the work.
hearing from the customers that we're
here to serve and sense making so that
we can test, learn, and then iterate to
achieve the most impactful results. Now,
I said before it's not easy and that's
because most of us have leed how to get
work done in more traditional
organizations and those mindsets and
habits tend to tend to run deep. Um, but
we know from evidence from other more
progressive organizations that adopting
these relational and agile approaches
really drives benefit. And we're not the
first organization to work in this way.
And we know that other charities are
starting to move in this direction, too.
But it's not as widespread, I think it's
fair to say, in the third sector as in
other sectors. And so for some people it
might feel like quite a culture shock
which is why we're really wanting to
talk about it today.
Um so Chris do you want to say a bit
more about how this relational approach
is changing our ways of working and then
from your perspective as an executive
director how you're sort of experiencing
the change.
>> Yeah absolutely. Um so this shift has
led to some real changes in how we think
about our work and the impact that we're
trying to make. So for me one of the
biggest realizations has been how we
work is just as important of what we do.
Um from my perspective as a exec leader
it's been a significant change one
that's required a real shift in how I
approach my leadership style. So it's
not about leading from the top and I
think if you feel that you want to join
an organization that leads from the top
and leads with eager that's not the
charity stroke association puts a lot of
emphasis on distributing that leadership
and distributing the decision making so
we all can deliver on our shared purpose
and to be honest it's more challenging
um because it requires real thoughtful
and situational leadership so we're
doing a lot of a lot more coaching just
to bring this to life a little bit. So,
a lot more coaching, asking questions,
helping colleagues make sense of their
own work and then supporting them in
identifying the ne next best steps.
So, it's about showing up with curiosity
as a leader and helping anchor
activities back to our purpose and why
we're doing the things that we're doing.
It's uncomfortable sometimes because it
challenges the old ways of proving your
worth by having an answer to something
because of your experience. And
obviously, you know, we're looking for
somebody that's got significant
experience in this area. So, you do have
a lot of answers, but it's not
necessarily showing up in that way. But
it doesn't dilute your experience. It
just asks you to use it in a different
way. Um, so asking great questions,
surfacing assumptions, removing
blockers, and keep keeping focus on the
outcomes for customers.
So you'll see some of this reflecting
the leadership capabilities that we've
outlined in the job pack. Uh, and in
practice, it means that we're drawing
much more on agile ways of working. Um,
and we start with the customer or
supporter in mind. And only when we
understand and truly understand what
their needs are do we start
experimenting with potential solutions.
So we talk a lot on the organiz
organization about uh we test we learn
and we adapt. It also means designing
the team uh right for the work not just
the team that you have. Um so we focus
much more on purpose over team and
skills overall and across the
organization we've got many many people
who are really really talented from our
frontline staff who are dealing with
stroke survivors um having significant
uh voice in uh in the development of the
organization. That's really encouraging.
Um and finally as an as an exec team
this is approach has made us far more
collaborative and corporateminded
uh putting purpose before our own
functional teams for example. So I would
say Juliet, it's interesting. It's
definitely challenging as you've
mentioned. Uh but it's incredibly
rewarding thinking differently in the
way of ultimately what is our role as a
leader and we owe to stroke survivors.
Uh we need to deliver more impact and
more for them.
>> Brilliant Chris. Good. So um that was
all that Chris and I wanted to say by
way of introduction. So, I think I'm
handing back to Rachel, aren't I, to >> Yes.
>> Yes.
>> try and respond as best we can to your questions.
questions.
>> Thank you so much for that. That was
really lovely to hear. Um, so yes, we do
have some questions. The first question,
if allowed, could you share the mission
that is working successfully for the
stroke association and one that the new
executive director would have
challenging the most and need to bring
constructive resolations
uh resolutions, sorry, towards its improvement.
improvement.
>> I can repeat it. That was quite a long one.
one.
>> That's fine. I can see it in the Q&A,
Rachel. It is a big question. So um I
think in terms of what is working well
um well there's a lot of things that are
working well. I mentioned earlier that
our legacy growth in the charity has
been um phenomenal and I think that's in
no small part because we're we really
understand our LEGO tours and we're
providing them with that really kind of personalized
personalized
um kind of engagement and experience.
And I think the opportunity to kind of
broaden our fundraising out as we engage
people just as much with our straight
support offer as our research offer and
as we co-create exciting like big and
ambitious fundraising propositions. I
think that's a huge opportunity for us.
I think
one of the challenges of the role which
I hope will excite people um is that
we've very deliberately designed the
role as I said before to not just be
about fundraising and income growth but
to also be about giving um time and
voice and I think the real opportunity
for this executive director is to give
parity of esteem to those other ways of
um contribution.
So although we are really good at
storytelling and we have some absolutely
fantastic stroke survivors and carers
who tell their story in the most
emotionally compelling way and that in
turn does really change mindsets about
stroke, we could do it on a much bigger
scale and we could do it in a much more
coordinated way. And again, we've got
people who volunteer for us. And the
good news is they stay volunteering for
us, but we just haven't really
prioritized um giving of time as much as
we have giving of money and we haven't
built the necessary culture. We haven't
built all of the kind of capacity and
capabilities that we need to really grow
our volunteering opportunities. And we
have some great volunteering products.
Um we have one called here for you which
is a telephone befriending service that
we set up during the pandemic which is a
brilliant example of people being able
to just volunteer half an hour a week
for six weeks. It's really light touch
but really impactful. There is so much
more we could do in this space. So for
me the biggest kind of challenge but
also opportunity is to give parity of
esteem not just to um giving of money
but also to giving of time and voice.
>> Thank you so much. Um the next question,
this person is curious to learn more
about the stakeholder groups this role
interacts with um for example the
current service receiving and the
volunteers. What did the con
consultations look like in making the
overall strategy? Are there ethical
walls between some of the groups for
example like those receiving medical
services or who have moved on from that
and are now only volunteers?
>> Chris, do you want to start on that one?
I'm not sure if I fully understand the
question right just
um so in terms of the I don't think
there's any barriers as such I think
we're a very engaging organization to
understand you know what is the needs of
stroke survivors and of the research
community and all stakeholders really in
the organization. So we're very inclus
inclusive and collaborative in a lot of
our approaches and that has you know
gone from the original aspirations in
our contract in our uh strategy back in
2019 shortly after Juliet arriving to
refreshing our corporate strategy and
recognizing what we need to do and how
we get that lived experience through
that. So it's a very collaborative
culture. So I'm not sure if that's
addressing that. And as a prime example,
we're just in the process of uh
confirming our research strategy. And
that was extremely collaborative and
working with different communities um
across you know the stroke the stroke uh
communities whether stroke survivors or
whether they're carers uh and within you
know clinicians and the the health and
social care sector. So uh it's a very
collaborative culture in that way that
incorporates the voice and I think this
probably demonstrates the fact that the
relational way of understanding what the
customer needs ultimately the the stroke
survivors who their needs are
significant as we know the impact of
stroke stroke has a profound impact on
people's lives. So we're reaching out
from what we call is uh uh outside in.
So we look at what the customers needs
and then we bring that inside the
charity to be able to influence um
influence the the approach that we take
whether that's strategy or actually
delivering more offers uh and support to
stroke survivors or whether that's
making sure our research um work that
we're doing is having an impact on
people's lives ultimately stroke
survivors lives. So, I'm not sure if
that answers, but Juliet, any thoughts?
>> Yeah. No, I thought that was brilliant,
Chris, because I mean, we we're part of
our new ways of working is to get closer
to our customers and really involve them
in um understanding the problem and kind
of co-designing um what some of the
solutions might be. And I I think one of
the things that we're trying to do is to
break down um traditional categories around
around
um our customers because we know that a
lot of our beneficiaries um so people
who um receive support because they're
stroke survivors or family members um so
often want to use that adverse
experience to then give back to others.
So they then go on to be our supporters.
And as I was saying earlier, I think in
the past we've often kind of put walls
around people and said, "Right, that
person is a supporter. That person is a
campaigner. That person is a volunteer.
That person is a storyteller." But
actually, what we want to do is break
those walls down so that people can
contribute whatever they want in a way
that works best for them and we treat
them as a whole person, not as our own
internal definition of what we think
somebody is. So, uh, it's an interesting
question because, um, yeah, we really
want to break the walls down and the
only things we have to do obviously is
through GDPR is respect people's, um,
kind of personal data and preferences
around how that data is held. Um, but we
think, um, that we've got the
opportunity to kind of really, uh, be a
lot more personalized, uh, in our approach.
approach.
>> Thank you. Um the next question of the
22 million people affected by stroke
what reach do you currently achieve and
what is your ultimate goal and in what
time frame? I know that this is quite
difficult to give an exact figure isn't it?
it?
>> Yeah. So I mean maybe I could um so the
22 million is uh people with a proximity
to stroke that so that's um stroke
survivors but also family members, loved
ones, sort of neighbors who are close to
somebody with a stroke. Um we know there
are 1.4 four million uh people in the UK
living with a stroke. And we know that
there are about a 100,000 strokes each
year. And of that 100,000 strokes each
year, uh we're only reaching about a
third of those who are newly diagnosed.
And so what we want to do is to be
accessible to everybody when they first
learn that they have a stroke because
that is the time when people are feeling
most frightened, most alone, most
confused and unsure what the next steps
in their recovery journey are going to
be. So, it's at that point when people
are in hospital about to be dis
discharged home that we really want to
make sure um that we're there for people
with that sort of personalized um
support and information offer. Um and
we're exploring ways in which we can
extend our reach um through our um
facetoface support but also
significantly expanding our digital and
um telefan offer. Um so I hope that that
helps and I suppose the 22 million
figure which is those with a proximity
to stroke. Our focus there isn't about
hitting a target but it's about
achieving our purpose and that 22
million just indicates the scale of the
opportunity for more people to
contribute because whenever we Chris I
think you'd probably say the same
whenever you talk to someone about
stroke everyone knows somebody who's had
a stroke haven't they? I mean it is
horribly um not just common but also
because it is so disabling. Uh people
kind of really identify on a very
personal and emotional level um with
stroke as a cause and a condition. And I
suppose if we could just turn a greater
proportion of that 22 million into
people who really want to you know
activate the stroke become our
supporters contribute time voice and
money. I think the opportunity is enormous.
enormous.
>> Yeah, I'd agree. Um like we know stroke
is impactful at the time. You know, you
don't plan for stroke. It happens. Um
but even through my career, I you know,
I've realized the amount of people who
do want to give to this charity. It's
the mechanisms of people to be able to
make it easy for them to give. And as
you said earlier on, Juliet, I think
we've categorized
um those that give money separate to
those that want to volunteer their time
and those that want to advocate for
stroke. Like these are people who just
want to give to stroke, whether that
they're fundraising, whether they're,
you know, exercising their their voice
um and their personal experience or
whether they want to be volunteering,
delivering support to other stroke
survivors. And a lot of stroke survivors
actually end up becoming volunteers for
us because they see it as part of their
recovery. Uh and we just need to make
that much more easier for them as well.
So I I I see the 22 million um as uh as
an opportunity to bring more people in
to be able to you know to be able to
give in them all them forms. Um I think
we as a charity need to develop a
culture that recognizes that much more
but also creates the mechanisms that
becomes really easy and I think this
role is there to set up that exper to
help us think about um about the
experiences and the supporter journeys
and we've got teams that are absolutely
ready for that and doing some great work
in some of the sprints that we're doing.
So it's not necessarily we're not that
mature but we do need a bit of support
to be able to recognize actually the
real value by making supporter journeys
really easy for people. I think more and
more people will willingly give uh their
voice time uh and money.
>> Yeah agree with that.
>> So you both touched on the digital
element of the role and I've had some
questions come in um which I hope people
don't mind. I will sort of put them
together. Um, people would like to know
what system we currently use and whether
our volunteers um have a different
database and a different system for example
example
um than like our donors. Um so it was
just to know how we sort of manage
things across the organization.
>> Yeah. So the really good news is that we
now have one single customer
relationship management system. It's on
Microsoft Dynamics. Um and so we now
have all of our beneficiary and our
supporter including volunteering um data
on one single database. Um and that's
only quite recent. Um but it's a
significant change because it really
gives us the opportunity to have a sort
of 360deree view um of the customer. Um
and now that we've got that kind of
single customer view in place and we've
got the functionality, now it's about
optimizing it uh for future success. Our
CRM capabilities are not I think as
mature as we would like them to be. Uh
but we are working on that as an
organizational priority. And we're also
using um kind of other tools like
PowerBI and other kind of tools to help
us visualize data um and to use data
more effectively. And we have a sprint
at the moment actually that is being um
supported by this external agency I
referred to before called Public Digital
who are helping us look at how we um
design mass communications to thousands
of supporters that feel really
personalized because we're really
understanding kind of what the
motivations and drivers are for each
individual. So I think that's one of the
tricks that we want to achieve with this
supporter approach is being able to
still um scale and um
mobilize sort of tens of thousands more
supporters to give time, voice and money
but in a way that because of the high
quality data that we've got on people
really speaks to uh their individual uh drivers.
drivers.
Chris, is there anything else that I've
missed on the tech
>> side? I mean AI, we are I mean we we
we're having some quite interesting
conversations about AI. in all um
organizations are using um AI in uh
different ways at the moment and uh we
certainly uh use it um internally um to
do all sorts of um kind of helpful
things in terms of um automating
processes acting as a decision support
tool helping us um create copy um and
we're working on an updated AI policy at
the moment and trying to learn from um
use cases elsewhere. So that is also
something we're looking at.
>> Yeah, I think
Oh, sorry Chris, carry on.
>> Yeah, I think the only thing to add is
we've got a number of systems obviously
in the organization like we've got the I
think I was trying to look through the
the questions that are coming up and
there's something around volunteering
and uh and stuff. So we've got obviously
got an internet um but you know we've
now removed we've now moved to
predominantly remote working
organization where I say predominantly
is because we do have some warehousing
colleagues who are in Northampton now
and resource center there so but you
know 99% of our staff um uh uh homebased
uh and remote working although do we do
considerable amount of collaboration you
know to be able to compensate the fact
that you can't beat the fact that being
um face to face creates creates dynamic
which allows creativity. So um so we do
have an intraate we have things like
that but to be honest even that we're
looking at as a system because it was
prior to uh moving to a remote working
organization. So we're putting some time
and effort and resources
um into looking at how that uh what that
looks like to be to enable people to get
the information they need. I'm sure AI
will have play a role within that. So
when coordinators, our staff are out
there, how do they pull the information
they need at that moment in time to help
them uh to support the stroke survivor
for instance or how do they engage with
the organization and that also relates
to volunteers as well. I would say that
um the experience of our staff is far
better than the experience of our volunteers.
volunteers.
um saying that and although we haven't
um we've last time we did a survey for
our volunteers was about three years ago
now and we're just considering uh a new
one uh at this moment in time to what's
the best approach. Uh but they're highly
motivated volunteers who are doing great
great work but they do say again going
back to the earlier point they want to
give more and they find it really really
difficult to give more. So some of that
is about the information that they see
uh they have access to through an
internet and at the moment our internet
volunteering is quite difficult uh to
access. So I think just from that
perspective and engagement and the
culture of the organization is something
we're looking at at the moment. >> Rachel,
>> Rachel,
>> thank you so much. Um, yes, you touched
on the volunteering aspect because
somebody has asked if we had micro
volunteering opportunities,
um, and that sort of thing. So, I
imagine it all links in with that,
doesn't it? Um, so that would go quite
nicely. Um, the other element that
people are quite interested in is
obviously this is a brand new position
um, that we've created.
um they would just like to know who they
would um sort of directly manage and
what the key parts of the role are. I
know that we've obviously touched a lot
of it. Um we've gone over a lot of the
key elements and there's a lot in the
recruitment pack. Um and I know that
this role is very collaborative, isn't
it? Um but just for those people who are
quite keen to know sort of how the um
responsibility sort of lies and how it's
shared I think that would be quite good
to touch on. Um
>> happy to do that Rachel. So um
so in line management terms um this job
holder will have um four teams. Um one
is the legacy engagement team. Second is
the mass engagement team. Uh which is
where our direct marketing, regional
fundraising, other kind of activities
sit. Um third team is our high value
engagement team uh which is where our uh
philanthropy and corporate partnerships
sit and then the fourth team is our
communications team. Um, and what we
want to do is to get those kind of teams
working uh really well together. I
talked earlier about um sometimes we
overemphasize short-term targets
uh to the detriment of kind of long-term
and kind of collaborative sustained uh
growth. Um but also I talked about this
isn't just going to focus on
fundraising. this role is going to give
parity of esteem to giving of um time
and voice. Um so we're really keen for
the job holder to really review what the
opportunities are around strategic
volunteering and to then determine what
the capacity and the capabilities and uh
structures are that we need in that
space. Um and obviously a lot of our
storytelling doesn't just happen through
our communications function. It also
happens uh through our localities and
all of the executive director roles. Uh
we'll be working to two kind of main
principles. The first is to be really
customer first in your thinking and your
way of working but the second is to be
locally informed. And an awful lot of
the storytelling um is supported and
generated by our 10 locality teams
across uh the UK. And uh a lot of the
volunteering activity is also supported
by those locality teams. Um both um
people who volunteer as individuals but
also people who volunteer in the big
network of um stroke support groups that
exist across the UK. And then also
there's a really strong um kind of uh
emphasis on um relationshipbased
regional fundraising. And again I think
there's real opportunities in uh
regional fundraising for growth we are
building back uh since the pandemic but
again I think with stronger um
relationships between localities and uh
the teams in the contribute system uh we
could be uh growing income. And then the
final thing that I would just say on
relationships is this executive director
will be part of the executive director's
team. Um we're uh redesigning uh the
team to have um an individual who is a
steward for each system but the systems
are porous and interconnected and as
Chris was saying earlier people who get
support from us very often then want to
give support they want to give back they
want to contribute uh to stroke. So
there's going to be an awful lot of kind
of joint working and crossover between
the roles of the executive director
support and contribute but also with the
executive director of influencing
because we want to be mobilizing um
supporters to be advocating and
campaigning for stroke um and being
involved um in the way that we do and
say things. So uh that's a very long way
of saying relationships will exist
across the whole organization but they
will have a small number of teams for
which they have uh executive support responsibilities.
responsibilities.
>> Thank you. That was really helpful. Yes,
because I had a few questions on sort of
um what teams sit underneath this role.
So that was really helpful. Thank you.
Another question is what do we plan to
achieve for those uh who have
experienced stroke with the outcomes of
the contribute system? So i.e. why do we
need more money and what will we use it
for? What will we deliver?
>> Chris, do you want to start off on that one?
one?
>> Yeah, happy to. So if you've had the
opportunity to look at our finances, uh
we're in a very strong financial
position. We have uh reserves of which
our trustees want to invest to grow the
organization. But you will also see that
our income and expenditure per year is
just about balancing out. And what we're
trying to do is use that money to be
able to drive the organization in terms
it's sustainable in long-term you know
portfolio of income. Uh Juliet's already
mentioned that we're only meeting a
third of stroke survivors. So thousand
100,000 people have uh uh impact uh
their lives are impacted by stroke and
we're directly supporting a third of
those. So that just gives you an
indication um of the the gap in what we
need to and how we need to support. So
we've got a sprint which is looking at
our integrated offers. So
um that's you know looking at ways of
being able to support stroke survivors
in different you know different ways and
integrating what we currently provide in
a way of which able to bring real value
to stroke survivors when they need that
at the time they need that. Um but we
know we need to grow significant in
terms of meeting all newly diagnosed. So
we need money to be able to do that. Um
and I think we've got a real proposition
to sell to the to to those you know
connected to stroke and beyond. Um so
it's finding the way as mentioned about
storytelling and we're great at
storytelling. We just need to be really
good at storytelling to attract time,
money and voice. Um so we definitely
need money to be able to grow the
organization and then grow our impact
because of that gap. and we want to put
more in research where, you know,
there's not many charities out there
that do a lot of um sort of the the the
impact of the so the method impacts
being as diverse as us. uh and that's
great to some extent because we can
influence different parts of the impact
of uh on support to stroke survivors but
also is really quite tricky because we
have to spend and split our money
accordingly over your research over
giving um uh sorry over um uh support
etc. So yeah, we we've got aspirations
of growing our research. We've got
aspirations of growing our reach. Uh and
that all requires us to bring in a
long-term sustainability of funding to
enable us to have the the you know the
the impact that we want for stroke
survivors knowing that gap. Um and also
the not just in terms of people you know
supported people but the diversity of
need for stroke survivors is
significant. So we do have a number of
our services and offers that tap into
whether it's emotional impact or
practical impact uh supporting people.
So again we need to grow uh the range of
support to people because stroke is very
diverse and complex and we also know
that stroke survivors and you know
obviously the impact that that has is
significant for them but family and
friends also impacted and it's about
supporting them. So as a charity we it's
a great charity to work for. Obviously
26 years is a good example of that. Uh
but also the the demand for us as an
organization and what we need to do to
be able to support that is significant.
So I wouldn't underestimate uh the
challenge. But I just wanted to to
mention one thing. I think you'd be
joining a really great team who
collectively earns that responsibility.
you know, it's not an organization that
just has and that's why I think as
Juliet explained about teams, you know,
I'm often involved in work which is
million miles where a HR director would
normally be uh and that's really uh
great because I'm really touching the
impact of this charity, this great
charity. So you'll be joining a team of
which is really up for the change but I
think you will be bringing a level of
expertise and knowledge to be able to
one influence the executive directors
maybe challenge our thinking as well as
challenging the organization but you'll
be s you'll be doing that together. It's
not about just you as an island in your
own right you know delivering a
functional activity. you'll be joining a
very collaborative organization if
that's something you're looking for. And
if it's not, it's probably not the right
>> Juliet, did you want to add? I think
Chris did such a fantastic
>> fantastic job.
>> Nothing to add.
>> Yeah. Uh, thank you so much, Chris. You
obviously mentioned where a lot of the
money went um in terms of research
support, that sort of thing. We've had a
question um in terms of the revenue that
we got across last year. You probably
don't know this from the top of your
head. You may um but somebody would just
like to know what um where did that
increase mostly come from? Like where
did that revenue come from?
>> Yep. So I'm happy to talk to that
because we have a board meeting on
Wednesday at which they will be
approving the 202425
annual report and financial statements.
Uh so I'm happy to give those numbers.
So um Rachel just to clarify because I
can't see the question. Was the question
relating to income or expenditure or both?
both?
>> Um in um Oh, hold on. My mind's gone
blank now. I'm pretty sure it was income.
income.
>> Income. Okay. So I mean I'm going to
give you a simple answer and then I'll
give you a longer answer. Um so broadly
our total income spits into
uh three parts um legacies
um other fundraising and then income
from the delivery of commissioned
services and they're about a third a
third a third. Last year we had an
exceptional uh fundraising year. Um and
our total incre income went from 42
million the previous year up to 44.4
four million uh last year. Um and that
was in no small part thanks to a really
uh strong legacy income year. But all of
our um income streams did well. Um the
challenge around our
uh commissioned uh service income is
that we don't deliver commissioned
services to make money. We deliver
commissioned services in order to reach
and improve the lives of stroke
survivors, but we are finding in working
with the public sector because most of
our contracts are with the NHS or local
authorities that our margins are getting
squeezed. So, we're working really hard
to improve the evidence about the
quality, the value, the impact of our
support offerings uh in order to protect
that uh as an income stream going
forwards. I would say that quite a
number of our fundraising products are
quite traditional. Um, and we are
undertaking a fundraising product
portfolio at the moment with a view to
seeing where we can drive more
innovation where we can be spotting uh
trends that are working in other
charities that we could repurpose for
stroke. And I truly believe that if we
are improving the personalization of our
communication and engagement uh that
will also drive income.
>> Thank you. Um as we are on the topic of
income and money,
another question is do you commercialize
any of your investment into research?
For example, if you are investing in new
technology for earlier/ more rapid
diagnosis of stroke, do you negotiate
commercial terms to generate long-term
income and should the technology be sold
commercially etc. Okay. So, that's a
really interesting question and I do
understand the premise of that question
because I chair the Richmond group of
charities and we recently convened um a
group of that coalition to come together
to consider whether we should set up an
angel investors fund to kind of uh
generate more early stage uh funding
into research. But I would say that our
stroke association research is um
characterized as being more about early
proving of new treatments and providing
seed corn funding to then enable big
global um randomized control trials um
to succeed. Um so
our research findings are then
subsequently picked up by other major
research funding institutions and they
would then um hold the um intellectual
property. But having said all of that,
we are exploring new ways of packaging
research work in forms that major donors
will find attractive. Um and certainly I
think um angel investors to help with
the pump priming or seedcorn funding for
early stage research is something that
we're interested in exploring.
>> Thank you. And just got time for one
more question I think. Um what would you
say are the main issues um that we've
been facing with changing the internal
culture of appreciating and valuing
Um, so maybe I could just talk a little
bit about our culture and then maybe
Chris you could pick up the one around
supported time. I mean I have to say
that people who come to work at the
stroke association
really do generally find it a great
place to work. So we consistently do um
staff engagement surveys and um
consistently 85% or more staff say the
stroke association is a good or great
place to work and they recommend uh the
stroke association as a place to work
and people um really do feel supported
by the line manager uh supported by
their team feel that the organization
lives its values and that people can
have um a voice. So I think we do have
um a really nice um culture um of
appreciating staff and that very much extends
extends
um to our supporters as well. And Chris
was talking about the collaborative
culture. We have a culture where we
express gratitude and um really thank
people um kind of regularly uh for the
contributions that they do make. Um but
Chris, is there anything else that you
want to say that I've missed?
Um like you've mentioned about the
culture of the organization about you
know people great found it a great place
to to to uh to work but also uh
volunteer as we've mentioned earlier on
and in particular our commitment to the
cause of stroke and the purpose of the
charity is up there in the 94 95% the
all people who come to work with us and
volunteer to us with for us are
absolutely committed to um to want to
make good for stroke survivors and their
families and beyond. Um I think it
probably lean leans into a little bit of
the conversations we've been having
about the fact that there is more to be
done significantly more to be done to be
able to support stroke survivors and
develop the systems around that whether
it's us influencing the health and
social care system which we haven't um
talked a lot about. This role is
obviously not directly responsible.
We've got another zigzag director, but
they will play a significant role in
supporting you know the influence of the
charity over uh over the system whether
that's health or social care for
instance. Um and then you know we
delivering uh we need to deliver more
for for uh stroke survivors and
obviously that's an area of focus and
also community engagement. We do some
great stuff around community engagement
but we could do much more and I think
that's why the the time and the voice
comes in. As I say there's significant
pe numbers of people who are already
working for the charity or sort of
volunteering for the charity would like
to give more of their voice and their
lived experience. Um so I think again
you know our community engagement which
is predominantly done at the locality
level. Um and uh we support a wide range
of of of support groups uh across the
country. Um I would say it is um and
then all of them are volunteers. Uh and
we do to me need to make sure that their
experience is uh uh is much more
improved I think. So again, that time to
be able to support the communities that
we're serving and the engagement of them
communities and the volunteering, I
think, is an area for real growth.
>> Yeah, I agree with that. And I I just
think the thing that's so exciting about
this role is is just our huge strengths
in the talent of our people, the skills
of our people, and that's staff and
volunteers, and that kind of enormous
passion and drive to do the right thing.
We've got that now. We've got the
potential to increase that. And I think
one of the things that I really hope the
new executive director will do is kind
of focus on um some of the systems
around all of that that's getting in our
way. And a lot of these are kind of
internal um kind of culture, capacity,
capability, system challenges that we
absolutely have within our gift uh to
resolve and are already um starting to
resolve. So I think the opportunity for
us to really mobilize an army of
supporters who want to give even more to
the cause of stroke is just um
phenomenal. So, um I do hope uh you feel
that sense of kind of uh potential and
uh passion from Chris and myself. And
we've been deliberately open and honest
in the pack um about where we are now
because um transparency and being open
and honest is uh core to one of our values.
values.
>> Thank you so much for that.
Unfortunately, we don't have any more
time for questions, but as I mentioned
earlier, we will be answering the rest
of your questions and posting them onto
our recruitment site, so they will get
answered. Um, so please just bear with
us. Thank you so much, Juliet and Chris,
for all of that insight and for your
time. It was absolutely fantastic and
thank you to everyone for joining us. Um
hopefully you're just as excited as we
are about this new and exciting role um
and the changes at the stroke
association. What we're going to do now
is just present to you um a little slide
just to show you some of the key dates
um if you want to put them in your
diary. You can also find them on our
recruitment site as well. Um so these
are the key dates for this role in
particular. If you've got any questions
at all, please email applicationsstroke.org.uk.
As I mentioned, literally everything is
on our recruitment site. You can
download our pack. You can find out all
of this information and this session
will be uploaded onto there along with
the answers to your questions. But yes,
again, thank you so much to everyone for
your time today and we hope you have a
lovely rest of the day and have fun
applying for this role.
Thank you.
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.