0:00 the probability of a recession, I think
0:02 it's over 90% and the stock market has
0:05 to go down. When I say earnings tumble,
0:08 remember what's priced in now is is
0:11 something on the order of earnings
0:13 growth of 10%. And I say no, it's it's
0:16 going to be zero or maybe even below
0:19 zero. Maybe maybe profits will even be
0:22 in negative territory. So So there's a
0:25 long way to go. Things are just warming
0:27 up. This could be a really bad economic
0:30 quarter for not just growth but also
0:32 earnings. We'll talk about why. Steve
0:34 Hanky joins us today. He is a professor
0:36 of applied economics at Johns Hopkins
0:38 University and an expert on monetary
0:40 policy. Will we'll be talking about his
0:42 views on what the tariffs will do to the
0:44 economy, also inflation. Welcome back,
0:46 professor. Good to see you. Last time I
0:48 saw you was in person in Baltimore. It's
0:51 it's good good to see you again.
0:53 Obviously, I'd prefer in person, but we
0:56 can't do that.
0:59 Yeah, we're back to our usual grind,
1:01 both of us in a suit and you surrounded
1:04 by books. Um, last time it wasn't the
1:06 case. Um, although there were books in
1:08 your office. People should check out our
1:10 last conversation, by the way. Link down
1:11 below. I visited Professor Hanky in
1:13 person. We had a great conversation.
1:15 Anyway, today we're going to be talking
1:16 about uh what tariffs will do to the
1:18 economy. Not good according to uh
1:20 consumer sentiment. Take a look at my
1:22 screen here. This is from CNBC. Consumer
1:24 sentiment um well this is inflation uh
1:28 but uh they also had a story on consumer
1:30 sentiment. Here we go. Tumbles uh in
1:32 April as inflation fears spike.
1:34 University of Michigan surveys uh survey
1:36 shows. Let's talk about inflation fears
1:38 because the consumer believes the
1:40 inflation uh number will spike. I'm
1:42 going to ask you the expert if you
1:44 believe the inflation numbers will
1:45 spike. But we'll get to that in just a
1:47 minute. Consumer sent sentiment grew
1:49 even worse than expected in April as the
1:51 expected inflation level hit its highest
1:54 since
1:55 1981. The survey's mid-month reading on
1:57 consumer sentiment fell to 15.8
2:01 uh to 57 in March and below the Dow
2:04 Jones consensus estimates for estimate
2:06 for
2:07 54.6. Now if you take a look at the
2:09 10-year uh we were just talking about
2:10 this offline. Um it's been spiking up.
2:14 Maybe the bond market also believes in
2:16 higher inflation expectations. But
2:18 anyway, let's go back to consumer
2:20 sentiment. Is the consumer is the
2:22 American consumer right to be worried
2:23 about uh weakening wealth prospects and
2:26 of course higher inflation? Well, the
2:29 they're correct to worry about a
2:32 slowdown in the economy. Uh we we've
2:35 talked about this a number of times, but
2:36 now now we have we have a couple things
2:39 going on.
2:41 One one thing that you and I have talked
2:43 about, David, for a long time actually
2:46 is the fact that the money supply is is
2:49 the fuel for the economy. And when the
2:52 money supply contracts like it's done
2:55 since the summer of
2:56 2022, you eventually that that gets that
3:00 slowdown gets transmitted into the
3:02 economy and the economy slows down. So
3:06 So that's why I keep using this
3:08 expression. Well, a slowdown is baked in
3:10 the cake and and it has nothing to do
3:12 with whether who's president or any of
3:15 those things. It's just a function of
3:17 what the money supply is doing. So, so
3:20 we had that coming on us this year. Mo
3:24 most people, by the way, didn't didn't
3:26 haven't seen this coming at all because
3:28 they don't pay any attention to the
3:30 money supply or the quantity theory of
3:32 money.
3:34 And then what all of a sudden we get a
3:38 second aspect coming in and and that's
3:40 the the Trump tariff the Trump tariff
3:44 tantrum I would say and and and that is
3:48 really throwing
3:50 a a lot of sand in the gear shall we say
3:54 and and that will just make the slowdown
3:57 even worse and and probably will have
4:00 you know a recession a technical
4:02 recession
4:04 And and so that's why people are
4:06 concerned. They they they that's one
4:09 reason they're concerned. The other
4:11 reason is that something I call regime
4:14 uncertainty. And that is
4:16 that when when you you you get
4:19 tremendous activism uh in in a
4:23 government where they're they're
4:24 changing kind of everything.
4:27 uh you you get regime uncertainty and
4:30 that that's different than the kind of
4:31 pinpointed little micro uncertainties
4:34 that develop about this thing or that
4:36 thing. It's it's like
4:38 everything. And the only time we've had
4:41 that, by the way, is with Franklin
4:42 Delanar Roosevelt in the New Deal. In
4:45 the in the New Deal, the New Dealers
4:48 were changing everything in the 1930s
4:50 with Roosevelt, even doing things like
4:53 making it illegal to hold gold. So they
4:56 were they were they were just changing
4:58 to tore up the rule books and were
5:01 changing everything and and even talking
5:04 about packing the Supreme Court and all
5:07 kinds of things. This the same kind of
5:09 rough scenario that that has enveloped
5:13 the Trump administration where just
5:16 every everything is on the table to be
5:19 torn up and changed and that that
5:22 creates regime uncertainty. Now what
5:24 what happens with regime uncertainty is
5:27 that not not only the
5:29 consumer hunkers down and consumer
5:32 sentiment goes down but more importantly
5:35 investors hunker down and and they stop
5:39 investing and and in the New Deal by the
5:42 way the regime uncertainty was very
5:45 serious and and there was essentially no
5:48 investment in the United States from
5:51 1929 until the end of World War II and
5:54 and the regime uncertainty and the
5:57 resulting
5:59 uh drought in investment meant that the
6:03 Great Depression actually lasted a lot
6:06 longer than it would have if we wouldn't
6:08 have had the New Deal. The the
6:10 propaganda was happy days are here
6:13 again. You know, Franklin Delaner
6:14 Roosevelt, the New Deal. That was their
6:17 slogan. It was absolute propaganda. what
6:20 they were doing is just slowing
6:22 everything down, making the depression
6:24 much worse, let making it last a lot
6:27 longer. So, so you have that aspect now
6:31 coming in on top of the monetary
6:34 contraction. So, it was all it's the
6:37 scenario is exactly the same as the
6:39 Great Depression. The Great Depression,
6:41 the money supply contracted. Of course,
6:43 it contracted a lot a lot more than it
6:47 has contracted in the United States now.
6:49 It was it was down about
6:51 38% from from the start of the
6:54 depression until the trough of the money
6:56 supply. So So the money supply comes
6:58 down that that makes everything collapse
7:01 and then on top of it you get this
7:03 regime uncertainty that that makes
7:06 investment collapse and and and and you
7:09 really have a big problem. So, so where
7:11 we're going with this, it relates to the
7:14 stock market and it relates
7:18 because if if the slowdown occurs like I
7:22 think it will and and still some people
7:24 now are talking a little bit about
7:26 recession, the probability of a
7:29 recession, I think JP Morgan or Goldman,
7:32 I can't remember which one headed it,
7:34 you know, between 40 and 60% or
7:37 something like that. I think it's over
7:38 90%. It it's really big. You think it's
7:42 over 90%. Yeah, I think it's over 90%
7:45 this year. This year. So So as a result
7:50 of a slowdown, of course, sales go down
7:53 and profits go down. It's it's really
7:55 interesting because um I think more
7:58 people are turning more bearish on the
8:00 economy like you. But uh if you take a
8:01 look at the New York Fed probability of
8:03 a recession is predicted by the Treasury
8:04 spread, it's actually going down, not
8:06 up. But that's a different indicator, I
8:08 guess.
8:10 um 12 months ahead month there there
8:12 there's a pretty big difference. I mean
8:14 I I'm accurate in the New York
8:16 Fed is clueless. Fair enough. Um by the
8:20 way uh former uh former St. Louis Fed
8:24 President Jim Bullard made a comment on
8:26 the news recently and I I think he kind
8:28 of echoes your sentiment, but I'd like
8:29 to get a response to this. Um he said
8:31 that this is looking a lot like a Smoot
8:34 Holly. The main diff the main thing is
8:36 that this has dramatically raised the
8:38 risk of a smooth holly type
8:40 outcome. So smooth holly was 1930 other
8:43 countries retaliated global trade
8:44 collapsed in the great depression was
8:47 on. So I think that's what's what has
8:49 really people worried about this.
8:52 Absolutely. So this this the great
8:55 depression you had a two-stage thing.
8:57 You had the money supply started to
8:59 contract. the economy starts going in
9:01 the tank and then you had the smooth
9:03 holly tariff wi which which in a way it
9:07 was very bad one the worst one we've
9:10 ever had in terms of tariffs but it I
9:12 don't think it's as bad as what Trump's
9:14 doing the rates weren't as high and and
9:16 they were much more certain what what
9:18 was going on but but then the stock
9:21 market crashed after the a the smooth
9:25 holly tariff was announced on
9:29 The the Smooth Holly tariff was
9:31 announced in March of 20 of 1930 of 1930
9:37 March and and then the stock market
9:41 started really crashing and went down
9:44 until July of
9:47 1932. It hit a low that it was
9:51 83% lower than it was when the tariffs
9:55 were announced. So it just to totally
9:58 wiped everything out. So I I agree with
10:01 Bullard. Um I you know that he he's got
10:04 it
10:05 right and and let's get back to the
10:09 earnings thing a little a little bit.
10:11 So, so we we have a recession
10:15 coming and and with a recession sales go
10:19 down and if sales go down, profits go
10:22 down, earnings go down and and the
10:24 consensus uh is interesting. The
10:27 consensus on
10:29 earnings was 15% growth this year. Then
10:33 they then they brought it down to 13%
10:36 and and most recently they brought it
10:38 down to 10%.
10:41 I think it's going to be
10:43 zero. I I've always said I thought they
10:46 were being the consensus is too
10:48 optimistic and and the the basic reason
10:51 they're too optimistic. I think Jamie
10:53 Diamond agrees with you. Yeah. S&P
10:57 earning estimates to fall as companies
10:59 pull guidance. He expects uh he's
11:01 expecting analysts to slash their S&P
11:03 500 earning estimates for growth of 5%
11:06 to becoming flat and then as much as
11:08 negative 5% probably the next month. So
11:11 that's exactly what you're saying. Yeah,
11:12 D. Yeah, I'm I'm exactly on the same
11:15 page as Diamond. He's got the thing
11:17 right.
11:19 But so why why is it because of uh
11:22 weaker consumer demand? Is it because of
11:24 uh global trade? Is it because of a
11:26 decreased margins from these tariffs?
11:28 What is the reason for this? Well, all
11:31 of the above. Okay, let me let me get
11:34 into the margin thing for just a minute.
11:36 You you mentioned all the key points.
11:37 Okay, so let me just go into one aspect
11:40 that people don't understand. Yeah. Let
11:43 let let's say let's say David Lynn is in
11:47 Taiwan. Okay. And and Lynn and Lynn or
11:50 one of your relatives over there in
11:51 Taiwan is selling Hanky something. So So
11:56 there are gains from trade as they call
11:58 it. There's a surplus generated by that
12:00 trade coming from Taiwan to the United
12:03 States be because the Lynn clan is is is
12:08 they think it's good. They're they're
12:10 making something out of it. Otherwise,
12:11 they wouldn't have sold the thing to
12:13 Hanky and Hanky is getting something out
12:15 of it. Otherwise, he wouldn't have
12:17 bought the thing. So, there's a surplus
12:19 resulting from that trade between Lind
12:21 and Hanky. And what does a tariff do? A
12:26 tariff is a tax on international
12:28 transactions. So it it drives a wedge
12:31 into those profits or those benefits or
12:34 the surplus resulting from the trade and
12:37 it takes it away like any tax and puts
12:40 it in the in in the in in the
12:42 government's
12:44 pocketbook. So So that's why earnings go
12:48 down. the the trade aspect. It tariffs
12:52 take away some of the surplus generated
12:56 by international transactions. It's just
12:59 that simple. Well, uh let's talk about
13:02 inflation then. Uh we referenced
13:04 inflation earlier in the interview as um
13:06 is something that consumers are
13:08 concerned about. Uh you talked you said
13:10 that they should be concerned about
13:11 slower economic growth, but should they
13:13 be concerned about higher inflation? So
13:17 this is the latest number. Inflation
13:18 rate eased to 2.4%. It came down from
13:22 2.8 to 2.4%. Uh core inflation rate uh
13:26 ran at
13:27 2.8%. Um and uh yeah, so basically
13:31 inflation is slightly cooling. Well, let
13:34 me let me comment on this. Um because
13:38 and and one reason I want to comment on
13:40 it and I'll I'll give myself a shout out
13:43 on this thing. John John Greenwood and I
13:46 are the only ones that have accurately
13:50 made a forecast of of where inflation
13:53 would go up to when they goose the money
13:56 supply started gooseing it in 2020 after
14:00 the COVID pandemic started. So we got
14:02 that exactly right. We said it would go
14:05 up to 9%. It went up to 9.1%. No, no one
14:09 was even close. They were all talking
14:11 about transitory and supply side shocks
14:14 and all this other garbage and and and
14:17 no one was paying attention to the
14:19 quantity theory of money and and
14:22 inflation always results from the fact
14:25 that prior to the inflation there's been
14:28 a a a big upward tick in the money
14:31 supply. So the upward tick in the money
14:34 supply and then with a lag you
14:36 eventually get inflation coming into the
14:39 system. Then the Fed put everything in
14:43 reverse and started contracting the
14:45 money supply once they once they hit the
14:48 panic button. And where did Greenwood
14:51 and I say inflation would be at the end
14:53 of last year. That's that's not very
14:55 that's the end of December 2024. We said
14:59 it would be between 2 and a half and 3%.
15:02 It turned out that it was 2.9%. It was
15:06 up on the high end of our range. And now
15:10 we're into February's number for 2025.
15:13 And where what do we have? We have
15:16 2.4%. It's actually a little
15:18 below the low end of our range that we
15:21 had for the end of
15:23 2024. So, so we've nailed this thing
15:26 completely using the quantity theory of
15:28 money. Remember, inflation is always an
15:31 everywhere monetary phenomenon. Now
15:34 let's jump into the the I I think people
15:37 are over excited about the inflationary
15:41 effects
15:42 of tariffs. Uh they they they won't have
15:46 really any inflationary effects. They
15:49 will have big effects
15:51 on particular prices on on relative
15:55 prices. The the the consumer price index
15:59 that you just put up there 2.4 for it
16:01 contains over 300 items and some are
16:03 going up, some are going down, some are
16:05 staying the same. You put a tariff
16:07 tariffs on and depending on what the
16:10 goods are, some things will go up. But
16:14 if the money supply doesn't
16:17 change, the overall picture will remain
16:20 pretty much the same, which which
16:23 doesn't mean that that consumer price
16:25 index might become a little bit more
16:28 noisy and volatile.
16:30 w with the tariffs a a as those things
16:33 work into the system. But the the
16:36 overall
16:37 thrust of of the consumer price index
16:41 will continue to go down and I think it
16:44 it might even hit the Fed's target at 2%
16:47 or maybe even a little below this year.
16:49 I I I understand your point about uh
16:51 relative prices moving and the overall
16:54 money supply still determining the
16:56 overall CPI, but take a look at stories
16:58 like this. First of all, people have
17:00 been commenting on on the internet about
17:02 their own experiences. Some stores are
17:04 now charging a sir charge tariff tax on
17:07 top of their goods. So the the price of
17:10 whatever they're paying for those goods
17:13 are going up because they're getting
17:14 taxed by those stores. Apple is said to
17:17 be flying iPhones from India to a US to
17:19 avoid Trump tariffs. is reportedly flown
17:22 two 600 tons of handsets from Indian
17:25 factories as Chinese goods face huge
17:27 tariffs. Now obviously they can't keep
17:29 doing this indefinitely. I think people
17:31 are speculating that the next generation
17:34 of iPhones
17:36 um will have to go up in price. Reuters
17:39 reported that Apple had targeted a 20%
17:41 increase in production at iPhone plants
17:43 in India. So they're moving away from
17:45 China. Uh but also there people are
17:48 concerned about whether or not the next
17:50 one uh would be higher in price. I mean
17:54 on the other hand the consumer can't
17:55 afford a more expensive iPhone right
17:58 now. So they're in a bit of a pickle,
18:00 hence the lower earnings. But anyway,
18:01 the point I'm making, professor, is that
18:03 a lot of companies are thinking about
18:06 raising prices to combat these tariffs.
18:09 There there are a couple things to
18:10 unpack. You you've you've made a very
18:12 dense statement with a lot of
18:14 information. So let's unpack it a little
18:16 bit. So So one one thing you said that
18:19 some stores are putting a a a so-called
18:23 tariff premium or tariff tax on the
18:26 goods that they're selling. Now that
18:28 that has an aspect to it that's
18:31 interesting and that is tariffs do
18:34 reduce the level of competition. You
18:37 know, the best antirust policy in the
18:39 world is open
18:41 trade- because if if you start if you
18:44 start misbehaving and start screwing
18:46 your customers, That's right. some some
18:48 foreigner is going to jump in there and
18:50 and and take you out. So, so tariffs
18:54 reduce competition and and and and that
18:57 can uh lead to some of these cases that
19:01 you're pointing out of the so-called
19:03 tariff tax. So, so that's one thing.
19:07 However, if you start really unpacking
19:09 whatever everything you were saying,
19:11 it's it's it's kind
19:15 of involves ad hoc theorizing. You're
19:19 you're cherrypicking examples to try to
19:23 make your point that that tariff tariffs
19:26 are going to increase the price of
19:27 everything and look at this store or
19:30 look at what Apple's doing or look at
19:31 this thing and that thing. The overall
19:34 thing you have to stand back and say
19:36 what is the only reliable theory of
19:41 national income determination that means
19:44 where is nominal GDP going that's the
19:47 real component plus the inflation rate
19:50 that's nominal GDP and the quantity
19:53 theory of money is the only
19:56 reliable established theory for national
19:59 income determination. So the the rest of
20:02 it is is a lot of kind of ad hoc
20:04 theorizing and and you know my my
20:07 grandmother my grandmother kind of
20:09 stories you know my my grandmother my
20:12 grandmother has tennis shoes kind of
20:13 thing. So that's that's that's that's
20:17 one take on the thing. Now, you did say
20:20 something about the the wealth effect
20:22 that and the wealth effect comes in
20:26 through the stock market because if we
20:28 go into recession and earnings come
20:30 down, that means that stock prices will
20:33 come down and that that means every
20:36 everybody's going to that's invested in
20:38 the stock market will see their wealth
20:41 go down. And when your wealth goes down,
20:44 you tend to hunker down a little bit,
20:46 not spend as much.
20:49 So, so it it it does come in and and and
20:54 and there will be a wealth effect coming
20:57 in via the the stock market. So, we we
21:00 not only have the money supply itself
21:04 coming down and contracting, not growing
21:07 very fast. Actually, it's growing now
21:11 year-over-year at 4.2%. and Hanky's
21:13 golden growth rate, a rate consistent
21:16 with hitting a 2% inflation target in
21:19 the United States is
21:20 6%. So, it's not only the stock has
21:24 contracted and come down since the
21:26 summer of
21:27 2022, but the rate of growth, it's never
21:30 really picked up to, you know, the
21:34 golden growth rate is 6% consistent with
21:37 hitting that 2% inflation target. So
21:41 there just a lot of things going on now
21:43 and and a lot of confusion out there
21:46 because by the way if you if you read
21:49 the press you'll just be totally
21:50 confused and not get it right. But
21:53 remember Hanky's 95% rule David 95% of
21:57 what you read in the financial press is
21:59 either wrong or irrelevant. That by the
22:02 way that's true for most podcast except
22:04 yours but uh that's another story. All
22:07 right.
22:09 Actually, I see I actually I do watch a
22:12 number of things on on yours and I let's
22:15 let's put it this way. I'll be
22:16 diplomatic and say I'm not in full
22:18 agreement with
22:23 with with some of your with some of your
22:25 Well, I guess that's why we have a
22:27 market that not everybody has to agree,
22:29 but I understand your point. Um, okay. I
22:32 just want to make one point about supply
22:34 chain issues during the pandemic. Um,
22:37 yes, the money supply went up, uh, but
22:39 also people were saying inflation went
22:41 up because the global supply chain uh
22:43 got choked up. I I I wonder if that
22:46 scenario could happen again um this
22:49 time. Well, yeah. No, it it it it will
22:52 and and people will point to that like
22:54 like the Apple importation uh from India
22:59 instead of China and they'll say oh
23:01 that's see how that's screwing up the
23:03 supply chain and the logistics of
23:06 everything but it will be the same story
23:09 the same transitory effect supposedly
23:13 which was all
23:14 wrong that it that that wasn't why we
23:18 got inflation. We got inflation because
23:20 the money supply, you know, it it went
23:22 up, by the way, after the after COVID
23:25 hit and the money supply was gooseed by
23:28 the Fed. It it went up to 18%
23:32 year-over-year. That that's the highest
23:34 year-over-year rate that the money
23:36 supply M2 had ever grown since the Fed
23:40 was founded in 1913. Yeah. So, we had an
23:43 unprecedented surge in the money supply.
23:46 and and no one none of these people
23:48 yakking about the supply chain the
23:50 transitory thing ever even mentioned the
23:53 money supply do you or they were just
23:55 out out to lunch I mean this is this
23:59 there'll be a lot of this in the paper I
24:01 should warn people there will be what
24:03 you what you said will will occur
24:06 exactly again they'll they'll get on the
24:09 same horse they'll ride the same saddle
24:12 they'll be at the same rodeo and they
24:15 will be strong as they were when the
24:17 inflation started going up in 2020 2021.
24:23 Do you think the Fed My question is do
24:25 you think the Fed now looking around
24:27 will be forced not forced? I mean no
24:29 one's forcing them but will they be more
24:31 inclined to increase the money supply
24:34 this time in light of slower grow uh
24:38 global growth prospects? Currently the
24:39 money M2 is growing at 3.87% annually.
24:44 Well,
24:45 uh, I it's it's a little bit hard to
24:49 tell. They they might do it, uh, which
24:52 would be fine, but but not for the right
24:55 reason because they they don't look at
24:56 the money supply. They they'll fool
24:59 around with the interest rates. May
25:00 maybe they'll stop quantitative
25:02 tightening. Now, this what's going on in
25:04 the bond market, the
25:06 10-year re remember I I I I was always
25:09 bullish on the 10-year and I said for a
25:12 trade, I thought it was a good thing and
25:14 it and it was a great trade until until
25:17 about a week ago when when Trump laid
25:20 into this tariff thing. And what
25:22 happened? We had a Treasury auction this
25:25 week and usually primary dealers and C
25:29 foreign central banks buy around 15 16%
25:33 of of each one of the
25:35 uh the the supply of treasuries at the
25:39 auction this week. They they were they
25:43 bought like one one one and a half%
25:45 only. And and within minutes after that,
25:50 Trump
25:52 called for a 90-day pause in the
25:54 tariffs. That's what caused that. If you
25:56 want to know what was going on, you you
25:59 have to understand the plumbing of the
26:01 system and how things work. And and that
26:04 that auction failure, it was a complete
26:07 failure.
26:09 And I'm certain Scott Basset, the
26:13 Secretary of Treasury, pressed the panic
26:16 button, which uh Trump saw and and they
26:20 dialed back on the tariffs, put the
26:22 90-day pause in and now it's just gotten
26:26 worse. The the the if the 10 years over
26:30 four and a half% right now. Now, now
26:32 that that's going to be a huge problem
26:34 for the federal budget because interest
26:37 payments are are are accounting for
26:42 13.1% of government expenditures
26:44 already. A huge thing, you know, because
26:49 when you pay interest, when the
26:51 government pays interest, no one's
26:53 getting anything for it. They're just
26:54 servicing debt. They're they're not
26:57 getting any product or or paying any
26:59 wages or anything. They're just paying
27:02 creditors who who've loaned the
27:04 government money and and that's going to
27:07 go up and and blow a hole in the in the
27:11 budget
27:12 and cause a bigger deficit. And and that
27:16 bigger deficit, by the way, may maybe
27:19 the the Fed will be under a lot of
27:21 pressure to be buying some of those
27:23 bonds that are being used to finance the
27:26 the deficit. Or maybe they'll buy
27:29 because the dealers aren't buying and
27:31 the foreign central banks aren't buying
27:33 and the Fed starts buying. And if that
27:36 happens, then the money supply will go
27:37 up. David, that that's the that's the
27:40 way to think about what's going on.
27:42 Okay. And if that happens, we'll follow
27:44 up again and uh see what happens to the
27:47 money supply and uh and uh inflation.
27:50 All right. I have a few minutes left. Uh
27:52 professor, we have to take a look at the
27:54 dollar. U you mentioned the 10-year
27:56 yield spiking. So that's what happened.
27:58 The dollar though has been going let me
28:00 just close this. Dollar has been going
28:02 down. Um and this is what um this is
28:07 this this this is this is something that
28:08 came in from the news again. Uh the Feds
28:11 Kashkari says rising bond yields falling
28:13 dollar show investors are moving on from
28:14 the US. Minneapolis Federal Reserve
28:16 President Kashkari said recent market
28:18 trends uh show that the uh investors are
28:21 moving away from the US is the safest
28:22 place to invest. Normally when you see
28:24 big tariff increases, I would expect the
28:26 dollar to go up. This is true. It went
28:28 up in February. The fact that the dollar
28:29 is going down at the same time, I think
28:31 lends some more credib credibility to
28:33 the story of investors preferences,
28:35 investor preferences shifting the
28:38 10-year yield surge this week. Okay. Do
28:40 you agree with the statement? Yes. And
28:43 and and what I just told you before
28:46 confirms that from a technical point of
28:48 view, the the the the bond auction
28:51 failed. Central banks were were not
28:53 buying.
28:55 What are they buying instead now? Do you
28:57 know? Of course. Gold. Go. Gold just
29:00 made a new high today. Yes.
29:04 It's you know it's it's a April 11th as
29:07 we speak and and gold just made a new
29:09 high. Now that's another area. You know
29:12 I I've been right on target with gold.
29:15 I'll give myself another shout out. I
29:16 mean God you're you're not giving me any
29:19 shout outs. I can't believe it. David,
29:21 yeah,
29:23 your track record speaks for itself.
29:25 Well, you you know, when you've got to
29:27 toot your own horn, it gets pretty bad.
29:31 You have been right. You've also been
29:32 right on the bubble uh the stock market
29:35 bubble popping. Although that Yeah.
29:38 Yeah. That that took a lot of people by
29:39 surprise, the magnitude of the downturn.
29:42 Let's let's finish off on this question,
29:43 professor. Do you think that the worst
29:45 is behind us for equities volatility?
29:47 Oh, no. I I think things things are just
29:50 warming up. Yeah. Especially with the
29:52 earnings. Yeah. Right. This things are
29:55 just warming up because you got to think
29:57 of the big fundamentals and and and and
30:01 if if if my big picture is right because
30:05 of the one-two punch between the money
30:08 supply contraction and then the regime
30:11 uncertainty associated with the Trump
30:13 administration and the tariffs. You add
30:15 those two things together and we have a
30:19 recession and sales tumble,
30:23 earnings tumble and and and the and and
30:26 the stock market has to go down. When I
30:28 say earnings tumble, remember what's
30:31 priced in now is is something on the
30:34 order of earnings growth of 10%. That's
30:37 what the consensus of the analysts say.
30:40 And and I say no, it's it's going to be
30:43 zero or maybe even below zero. Maybe
30:46 maybe profits will even be in negative
30:49 territory. So So there's a long way to
30:52 go yet. Right. Good. Uh let's send it
30:55 here, professor. Very good update as
30:57 usual. Where can we follow you? On my
31:00 Twitter, I think is the best place.
31:03 Steve_hanky. That's for kind of real
31:05 time information. If for some reason you
31:09 want to be added to my weekly
31:11 distribution of, you know, I I
31:14 distribute, for example, like the David
31:16 Lynch show, I that that'll be
31:18 distributed this this week on my weekly.
31:21 You just write me an email,
31:25 hankyjhu.edu and and request to be put
31:27 on my mailing list. Thank you very much,
31:29 professor. Uh we'll speak again in a
31:31 couple weeks. Yeah. Thank you, David.
31:33 Great to see you again. Yeah, great to
31:35 see you again as well. And uh follow
31:37 Professor Hanky in the links down below.
31:39 And uh we'll see you next time. Don't
31:40 forget to subscribe.