YouTube Transcript:
ELT Materials Evaluation || Group 2 Language Material Evaluation and Design (LMED)

Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.

AutoDub

Understand YouTube Foreign Videos

Immersive YouTube Voice Translation

Break language barriers, embrace global quality content

Solve Foreign Video Barriers Instantly

Video Transcript

Good afternoon everyone. First of all,

praise to Allah for giving us help and

the change to deliver our presentation

today. We would also like to thank our

lecturer Dr. Asusima MD for her guidance

and support and also to all of our

classmates. We are from group two

consisting of

Laoza, Ria, Lisa, Nur, Suchi, Anisa and

Anna. And I'll be the moderator for

today presentation. And today material

uh we will present about the LT

materials evaluation and we hope this

presentation can give us the useful

insight and open up discussion together.

The first material is about the

definition of aim materialist evaluation

All right, Anna, thank you for the

opportunity. So here uh we explain the

definition of ELT materials evaluation

based on Tom Linden

developing materials for language

teaching. The definition of EL material

evaluation is material evaluation refers

to the systematic appraisal of the value

of material in relation to their

objectives and to the objectives of the

learners using them.

So here from the explanation of the

definition is systematic appraisal is

the process must be organized and

methodological not random or based only

on personal opinion and then value of

materials. The focus is on whether the

materials actually help in teaching and learning

learning

in relation to objectives. The

evaluation checks if the materials

achieve that they were designed for

teaching goals and then in relation to

learners objectives. It also check if

the materials meet the needs goals and

expectation of the learners who use them.

them.

So I can conclude that from the definition

definition

ELT materials evaluation is the careful

and systematic process of examining

whether teaching material effectively

achieve both the instructional goals set

by teaching or by teachers or curriculum

and the personal learner needs of the student.

student.

All right, I will give it back to Anna.

Okay, thank you Loza for delivering the

material. Next is types of PT materials

evaluation will be delivered by Ria please.

please.

Okay, thank you Anna for the

opportunity. Uh the next about the types

of teaching material evaluation there

are three types of teaching material

evaluation namely preuse evaluation,

wheels use evaluation and postuse

evaluation. The first is previous evolution

evolution

is uh conducted before the teaching

material is used. This evaluation aims

to predict that value and potential of

the teaching material for students.

However, it is often based on initial

impressions and subjective because

teachers usually only briefly assess the

content of the book. Even so, this

evaluation is important to assist in the

process of selecting the right uh

teaching materials.

The second is wheels in use evaluation.

It is conducted while the teaching

materials are being used in the

classroom. This evaluation is more

reliable that pre-use evaluation because

is uh based on direct observation of

student performs when using the teaching

materials. Teacher can see uh which

activities that effective and which are

not. and teachers uh help to modify the

materials to better suit uh for learning

needs. Thus this evaluation is very

useful to uh for directly improving the

effectiveness of teaching materials. And

the last is first use evaluation.

This uh this types is conducted after

the teaching materials have been used

for a certain period of the time. This

evaluation is considered the most

important because it can uh measures the

real impact of teaching materials on

student both in the short term such as

motivation and quick understanding and

in the long term such as deeper and more

lasting uh learning. In addition,

postuse evolution provides valid and

relable uh information about the

strength and weaknesses of teaching

materials make it uh very useful for the

development of teaching materials in the

futures. Maybe that's all for me about

types. I will hand it back to Anna.

Thank you.

Okay. Thank you Ria for delivering the

material. Next is about the criteria for

ELT materials materials evaluation. uh

All right. Thank you.

So in this section I would like to

explain about uh the criteria of ALT

materials evolution. According to

Tomlinson 2013 there is several criteria

of ALT materials evolution. The first

one is impact. Tomlinson emphasizes that

good materials must be must have an

effective impact on learners. The

material should be able to capture

students attention, interest and

emotions. And the next one is achiev

achievability. Materials should uh

provide opportunities for success. They

should not be too difficult or too easy

because over challenging materials can

uh frustate students and reaches

students confidence. Therefore, task

within the materials must be achievable.

And the third one is self-investment

one. Good materials should facilitate

learners selfinvestment. It means that

the material should encourage the

learners to engage personally,

emotionally and cognitively so that they

will feel invested in the achievable uh activity.

activity.

And the fourth one is readiness. The

material must be appropriate for the

mental, emotional and cognitive

readiness of learners to receive

specific language input. And the next

one is language uh exposure. The

materials must encourage students to

immerse themselves in order to

understand the language through

materials to through materials used by

native speakers in everyday life uh

rather than just using materials

specifically designed for uh lessons.

And uh seven

uh point is facilitation of language

development. Good materials should not

only teach the language but must create

an environ uh an environment that

enables learners to develop their

communicative competence through use and

direct engagement. That's all. I'll give

it back to Anna. Thank you.

Okay. Thank you Lisa for delivering the

material. Next is about example of

healthy material evaluation to Noodle

All right, thank you Anna. Uh

I'll explain about the example materials

evaluation in ALT specifically in

evaluation of reading unit in the course

book. Uh Tomson 201 and and 13 uh state

that there are four steps

about a material

four steps to evaluation materials in

NLT. The first is description analysis

using Tomlinson uh evaluation check

criteria the and the third one judgment.

The fourth is suggestion for

improvement. Um to make the explanation

simpler uh let's imagine the situation

there is an English book in English

textbooks inside there there's one unit

or chapter about cultural tradition. It

contains reading text about tradition

from different countries and then

question like answer based on the text

and then vocabulary pass uh like find

meanings of difficult words and then

short paragraph assignment. The question

is this material good or not and how to

evaluate it. The first step is

description. just tell what's there. So

the material like there's about cultural

tradition, there's a reading text,

question, vocabulary, task and so on.

Just describing what's inside, not

judging it. And then the second is

analysis check using a checklist uh

specifically using Tom Limson checklist

like is it relevant

the cultural traditions students can def

definitely relate this to their family

tradition. Okay, maybe good. And then is

it engaging? There are colorful

pictures. Nice topic, but why are just read

read

and boring? And then is the language

natural? Like they say it's from

authentic sources, but it feels too

simplified like baby language. And then

is it practical for teachers? Like the

instruction are clear. easy to

understand and it's good. The third step

is judgment or conclusion. The material

is good for practicing reading and

building vocabulary but it doesn't give

students enough opportunities to speak

and interact. And the last step is

suggestion. Imagine the problem like

student just sit quietly read answer the

question like a boring classroom and

then the solution

before reading we can like brainstorming

like tell us about your family tradition

first and after reading we make a

discussion like let's discuss which

tradition is the most unique and then

create role plays students act out

tradition from other countries and the

point is evaluation is like reviewing a

product. We check what's inside, is it

good, what's missing, and how to improve

it. So teachers know which materials are

worth using and which ones need modification.

modification.

Maybe that's it for example. I'll give

it back to Anna.

Okay. Thank you Nu for delivering the

material. And next material it's about

the benefits of the LT materials

evaluation will be delivered by Anisa to

I'm sorry maybe so

all right uh for the next material is

about benefits of English language

teaching materials evaluation. Uh the

first is ensuring learning

effectiveness. So evaluation help ensure

that materials truly support the

achievement of instructional objective

so that the learning material provide by

the teacher can give meaningful learning

experience for students. For example,

the teacher used a textbook to teach a

simple past tense. After evaluation, the

teacher discover that the practice

question were only multiple choice. So

students weren't actually practicing.

Then the teacher uh then add an

assignment to write about students

vocation. For example, uh student

vocation experiences using the simple

past tense to achieve uh the learning

effectiveness and then improvement

material quality.

The evaluation process allows for

continuous improvement or refinement so

that materials remain relevant, engaging

and aligned with student needs and the

latest uh education trends and then

helping in selecting appropriate

teaching materials. Evaluation both uh

predictive or before use and

retrospective after use helps teacher

determine the suitability of material

for student needs. For example, the

teacher uh want to teach speaking skills

and she evaluate two types materials

English language political debate videos

uh and she finds out that is it's too

difficult and then video of everyday

conversation in cafes for example. This

is easier to understand. So the teacher

choose conversation videos because they

uh they suit the abilities of high

school student for example who are still

in the intermediate level and then

provide feedback for material development.

development.

Evaluation result provide input for

teachers material authors and

institution to improve and adapt

materials to the learning context. For

example, the teacher create her own

listening mod module after using it in

class. Student found the uh pace too f

too fast and found many of the

vocabulary words difficult. So uh the

teacher record the result of this

evaluation and revise the material with

slower audio and a list of key

vocabulary at the beginning. uh

so uh this evaluation can be realized in

the next semester on in the next class

and then support the role of teacher as facilitators.

facilitators.

Uh by conducting evaluation teacher can

adjust modify or add materials to

letters with classroom condition and

student learning needs. All right, maybe

that's all for me. I give it back to Anna.

Anna.

Okay, thank you si for the printed

material. Next material is about

challenges of LT material evaluation

will be delivered by Anisa to Anisa please.

please.

Thank you Anna for giving me

opportunity. So the last point is about

challenges of material evaluation. The

first challenges is lack of universally

agreed upon criteria. It means that

there is no single standard for

evaluating LT materials. There is a

different teachers or researchers use

different criteria as heavies at all

2023 says it shows different criteria of

selection as well as a structure form of

selection and evaluation.

But um in Indonesia for example, BNSP

has BNS B SNP or B national certificating

textbook uh focusing on content language

presentation and also graphics. However,

uh this shows a local eart rather than

universally agreed upon standard. So

since researchers and feature in

worldwide context uh still apply

different criteria and the second point

is about time consuming and complex

process. Evaluation takes a lot of time

and effort especially because uh there

are so many ELT materials in the market

like according to His at all 2023 since

there are numerous LT materials on the

market it's not particial to evaluate

each and every detail. So this is shows

why teacher of the need a quicker method

to save time and third point is need for

is that material. It means that material

must fit the teaching context such as

the goal of the program, the objective

learning, the student, the student needs

and the classroom situation

like um so teachers need expertise to

adapt materials to their own teaching

method and number four is lack of

teacher knowledge or insight. The last

challenge is not all teacher have enough

knowledge about how to evaluate

materials. The article mentions from Isl 18.

18.

Some teacher may do the same task

without having enough insight into the

topic. Does the training help trainers?

So uh this mean that training is

important because without knowledge

might not be able to teacher not be able

Okay. Uh that's all for the materials for

for

ELT evolution materials and here's all

the conclusion for the conclusion is al

materials evaluation is the process of

checking whether teaching materials

match the students need and the course

goals. So it can be done before during

and after the use of materials to see

how the effective they are how the

student respond and what improvement can

be met. Through this process, teachers

focus on the impact of the materials,

their fidelity and how much they support

the learning. Evaluation help makes to

improve the quality of the materials,

makes the learning more engaging and

guides the teachers in choosing or

adapting the resources. Even though it

can be challenging due to the limited

time, lack of the clear criteria and the

need for the teachers to understand

their context well, materials evaluation

is still very important. It ensure that

the student get relevant, interesting

and high quality materials that truly

support their learning of the quality.

All right, that's all from us. If you

have any questions or comments, please

feel free to ask directly or write them

in the chat box and we'll be happy to

discuss them together in the chat box.

We also sincerely apologize if there are

any mistakes in our explanation or the

Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video

Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds

One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps

Paste YouTube URL

Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript

Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds

Get Our Chrome Extension

Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.

Add to Chrome — Free

Works with YouTube, Coursera, Udemy and more educational platforms

Get Instant Transcripts: Just Edit the Domain in Your Address Bar!

YouTube

←

→

↻

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

YoutubeToText

←

→

↻

https://youtubetotext.net/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

YouTube TranscriptPreparing your results…