The release of over three and a half million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's case reveals a deeply entrenched network of powerful individuals who allegedly facilitated, enabled, or ignored his criminal activities, while the justice system appears to have failed victims and protected the elite.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
On August 8th, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein sat
in a cell at Metropolitan Correctional
Center in Manhattan and signed an
updated version of his will, and he left
$50 million to his lawyer, $25 million
to his accountant, $10 million to the
children of a Norwegian diplomat, and
$10 million to Golain Maxwell, and $50
million two Caribbean islands, a
Manhattan townhouse, a Paris apartment,
a Palm Beach mansion, a New Mexico
ranch, a 33 karat diamond ring, and 48
loose diamonds to his last girlfriend.
And 2 days later, he was dead. And his
cellmate, a man named Efron Reyes, had
begged him not to do it. And Epstein
told him not to worry. And the next day,
Reyes was transferred out in a routine
move. And the day after that, Jeffrey
Epstein was found dead and alone. And
then something interesting happened with
the body. A jail supervisor told the FBI
that staff took boxes and sheets and
built what looked like a human body. And
then they loaded it into a white van,
one labeled as belonging to the medical
examiner's office. And the media
followed the van. But Epstein's actual
body that was loaded into a separate
black vehicle and it left quote
unnoticed. And that's in the files.
That's not a conspiracy theory. That's
from an FBI interview memo dated August
16th, 2019, released by the United
States Department of Justice on January
30th, 2026. And along with that, they
also released over 3 and a half million
pages of documents related to Jeffrey
Epstein, along with a 180,000 images and
2,000 videos. And it is by volume one of
the largest single document releases in
American history. And I need you to
understand something before we really
get into this. This video is not about
whether or not you believe in conspiracy
theories. Okay? This is not about
speculation. I'm not going to sit here
and tell you what I think happened. I'm
going to just read what's in the files.
I'm going to read quotes, okay? directly
from FBI interview memos, from emails
between Epstein and some of the most
powerful people on the planet, from a
draft federal indictment that was
written up ready to go and then just
never filed. I'm going to show you what
the United States government knew when
they knew it and what they chose to do
about it or what not to do about it, you
know. And Deputy Attorney General Todd
Blanch went on CNN and said it out loud.
In July, the Department of Justice said
that we had reviewed the files, the
quote epste files, and there was nothing
in there that allowed us to prosecute
anybody. And that's what that's what's
important for for the American people.
And the victims want to be made whole.
And and so we we want that. The attorney
general wants that more than anything.
But but that doesn't mean we can just
create evidence or that we can just kind
of um come up with a case that doesn't
that isn't there. And then he said,
"Essentially, we've shown our work. The
whole world can look at it now and tell
us if we got it wrong." So that's what
we're going to do today. See what they
got wrong cuz this [ __ ] is insane.
They're just going to put a big trigger
warning here. We're talking about a lot
of very sensitive issues. So if you have
any triggers to any of that or any
sensitivity to that, please feel free to
skip this video. But what we are talking
about is extremely important because it
is happening in our world and I feel
like we need to talk about it. And a lot
of the things I'm going to talk about
today have been glazed over and I'm
going to really get into them. So
without further ado, let's get into this video.
But before we talk about the names, and
we're going to get to the names, okay,
you need to understand what Jeffrey
Epstein actually built. And if you want
to get really indepth with who he was
and everything, you can go to my other
videos about him, especially my first
one. I'm not going to go into like who
he who he is and how he was built and
all that kind of stuff. We're going to
kind of glaze over that and get right
into all the new stuff. But there is a
tendency to talk about this like it was
a social scandal, like some rich creep
knew some famous people and things just
got out of hand, you know, and that
framing lets everybody kind of off the
hook. I think we're far past that now,
but you know, that's kind of how it's
how it's been talked about in the past.
But this wasn't a social circle. This
was an operation. It had infrastructure.
It had employees. It had logistics. It
had recruitment pipelines. And the
United States government had the details
in its hands for almost 20 years and did
absolutely nothing about them. And
buried in the three and a half million
pages is a 56-page draft federal
indictment prepared by prosecutors in
the Southern District of Florida
sometime in the mid 2000s. 60 counts not
just against Epstein against Epstein and
three co-conspirators described as
personal assistants who were quote
employed by Epstein and their names are
still redacted even now in 2026.
So, three and a half million pages
released and the government still won't
tell you who these three people are. And
the charges include trafficking of
children, conspiracy, enticement of a
minor, and traveling with intent to
engage in illicit conduct. And all four
defendants are described as having
conspired to, and I'm reading this
exactly as it's written, persuade,
induce, and entice individuals who had
not attained the age of 18 years to
engage in prostitution," unquote. And 19
girls are named, all under Jane Doe
pseudonyms, and some who were 14 years old.
old.
But here is how this all worked. The
co-conspirators would call the girls and
arrange travel to Epstein's Palm Beach
estate, and Epstein would use them and
pay them. And in at least one instance,
a girl was also made to perform acts
with one of the unnamed co-defendants
for Epstein's benefit. And the girls
were paid several hundred per visit. And
then they were encouraged to recruit
their friends, bring another girl, get
another payment, a pyramid scheme for
abuse. So, it was around $200 for a
visit, $200 for a recruit. And when one
girl hinted at telling someone, the
indictment says Epstein told her that
quote, "If she reported to anyone what
had occurred, bad things could happen to
her." She was 14 years old and the
indictment was never filed. And a blank
space where a grand jury for person
should have signed. Just disgusting. And
why? Why? There's also a separate
prosecution memo addressed directly to
then US attorney Alexander Aosta and it
recommended presenting a sealed
indictment to a grand jury on May 15th,
2007 and arresting Epstein shortly
after. And the memo describes Epstein as
direct quote an extremely high flight
risk and from information we have
received a continued danger to the
community based upon his continued
enticement of underage girls. So, they
weren't describing something that
happened once. They were telling their
boss, "This man is still doing it right
now. We need to arrest him." But
instead, Aosta cut a deal. And Epstein
pleaded guilty to a state charge, not a
federal, of soliciting from someone
under 18. So, not sex trafficking, not
rape, not conspiracy, soliciting
prostitution. As if a 14-year-old girl
was a willing participant in a business
transaction. Are youing kidding me? So,
he got his 18 months, serve 13 with work
release, meaning he could leave jail
during the day. And the Department of
Justice later reviewed the deal and
concluded Aosta had used their exact
words, poor judgment, not professional
misconduct, poor judgment. Hosta went on
to become Donald Trump's Secretary of
Labor. Okay, we're connecting dots here.
And he resigned in 2019 when all of this
started coming back around. And inside
the house among the FBI 302s is a 2007
interview with a household employee at
the Palm Beach estate, and his name is
redacted, but the agents wrote down
everything. And his daily duties
included fanning out $100 bills on a
table next to Epstein's bed, placing a
gun between the mattresses, cleaning up
after what Epstein called massages,
wiping down vibrators, throwing out
tissues, laundering towels, and
disposing of condoms. And he told agents
that Epstein once had him buy flowers
and deliver them to a student student at
Royal Palm Beach High School to
commemorate her performance in a school
play. And Epstein directed him to rent a
car for the girl described in FBI notes
only as UF, an unidentified female. And
he recalled another girl who looked very
young. And when the FBI asked him point
blank, "Do you believe some of the girls
were under 18?" The employee nodded. And
the agents noted he was quote affirming
that he believed some of the girls were
under the age of 18qu. And the FBI also
noted that Epstein enjoyed taking the
girls out for ice cream at a local
parlor and that he let some of them even
drive his cars. And the employees were
even sent to take them shopping at local
malls. So ice cream, car rides, shopping
trips, cash on a nightstand, and a gun
between the mattresses and flowers
delivered to a high school. just
textbook grooming, right? Just a
predator operating in broad daylight
with a full staff. And the FBI had this
interview in 2007,
okay? 18 years before these files were
released. And the Palm Beach Police
Department identified 27 girls and women
between the ages of 14 and 23 who went
to that house for massage services. And
they were typically paid $200 per visit.
and they were quote encouraged to find
other girls to bring with them also for
pay. And Galileain Maxwell did a video
on her as well. Didn't just recruit as
we've talked about before. And according
to the FBI's 302s, she ran the logistics
of the entire operation. And she brought
women in under the guise of professional
massages or dance sessions, always the
entry point. So you think you're getting
a legitimate job and then the massages
become something else as we know. and
Maxwell and Epste arranged domestic and
international travel for the victims and
they provided logistical support for
passports and they used modeling
agencies as fronts to recruit foreign
nationals. And one FBI report describes
Maxwell as quote dangerous figure who
directed victims clothing in social
interactions to suit high-profile men.
You imagine a woman a woman looking at a
child and dressing them up and
presenting them to these predators. Like
what? Iing hate this woman. so much.
Iing hate this. Well, I hate everybody
involved in this, but I it just
it's I I don't know. I'm going to get
very mad throughout this whole video.
Hope you know that. And the modeling
agent, Jeanluke Bernell, was identified
in the FBI records as an intermedial who
recruited young girls through modeling
fronts. And Bernell was later arrested
in France on charges of SA minors and
trafficking minors for exploitation. And
as we've said before, he was found dead
in his French and jail cell before trial
ruled a you know what, just like Epstein
convenience. But the control didn't stop
when the girls got out because multiple
survivors told the FBI that after
leaving Epstein's orbit, they were
contacted by people claiming to
represent his interests, people who
pressured them to cooperate with federal
investigators. But before we get into
who these girls were seeing or who they
were forced to see, I want you to hear
what this looked like for the girls
inside this machine. And the first was a
2021 FBI interview. And a woman told
agents she met Epstein when she was
around 14. And she confided at him that
her childhood had been, her word,
shitty. And she told him she had been as
a child. And Epstein told her he was
sorry about that. And then he started
having her come to his house for
massages and she described them as
uncomfortable cuz both of them were
undressed and he touched her in ways she
didn't want to be touched and she tried
to stop him. And the FBI notes say she
quote felt degraded when she went to
Epstein's home and felt taken advantage
of but she also said she felt happy
because she had a bunch of money
unquote. She was 14 and she'd already
been abused once and she told a grown
man about this abuse and then he just
took advantage of her vulnerability and
then got paid. Like what's a 14-year-old
supposed to think? And the second was a
woman who was approached outside of a
New York dance studio at 17 years old.
And she thought she was being offered
dance-based fitness sessions for a
wealthy client. And the sessions became
massages, of course, and the massages
became sexual encounters. And it just
continued for years. And Epstein paid
her, tried to control her career and
encouraged her to bring in her new
friends. And both women described the
same system, the same gradual
escalation, the same isolation, the same
financial control, the same machine. So
that is in all what we have. Emails, FBI
interviews, a draft indictment that was
ready to go. And employee testimony
about the gun and the cash and the
vibrators and the ice cream and the
flowers sent to the high school. just a
a a mechanized system of abuse with
employees, logistics, and recruitment
pipeline that treated teenage girls like
a renewable resource and zero new
prosecutions. Sorry, quick pause. I look
different right now. This is I'm
recording this on a different day. I
might look different in different parts
of this video just because more
information came up and I researched a
little more and wanted to add it to the
video. So, if you see me in a different
outfit, that's why. But, let's get back
into it. So then we have the diary and
among the files is a 32page journal kept
by one of Epstein's victims and she was
16 or 17 years old and her attorney
submitted it to the Department of
Justice as evidence and every page is
stamped confidential in attorney's eyes
only. And the entries describe a girl
living under total control. Everything
in her life, where she lived, where she
went to school, what she did was
dictated by Epstein. But what the diary
documents goes beyond control. And it
documents something much, much worse.
Cuz according to the diary, Epstein
fathered a child with this girl around
2002, and she gave birth to a baby girl,
and the baby was taken from her. And she
describes the birth, quote, "A shot and
those rod-like things had a hook and so
much pain, Galain said to push all the
pain away." And she also writes, quote,
I saw beautiful fingers, this tiny head
and body in the doctor's hands. It
reached its tiny arm and had a tiny
foot. And then she was given 10 to 15
minutes to hold and feed her daughter
before they took her. And she writes,
quote, "She is mine. I want her back."
distraught and a 20week pregnancy scan
is pasted into the diary and next to it
she wrote quote she is gone and she
won't be coming back. And in another
entry she writes about a second
pregnancy saying quote tomorrow is the
halfway ultrasound for Jeffrey. This one
stuck after they took the first baby who
survived and the early miscarriage. I
think it was called I no longer feel
like a person but a vessel unquote. Like
this is
like talk about Handmaid's Tail and
the rich taking babies like every
conspiracy theory the worst kinds we
ever thought of
are real. Like according to this diary
anyway allegedly, you know, but I I'm
just going to go ahead and choose to
believe the victims like I always have.
But I hope you do too because I just
wouldn't put a past
any I just wouldn't put it past them to
take kids and sell them. We'll get to
some even worse stuff that they could be
doing. Um
it's it's sickening. And she goes on to
say, quote, "Will they take this one,
too? Who has the first one? Where did
Galain go? She is never around. I am not
old or mature enough or even in a place
to have a baby that I would be
responsible for. Will I ever be free?
And in a separate entry, she describes a
miscarriage, saying, quote, "So, it came
out in the toilet, and I didn't know
what to do, so I just flushed the tiny
little fetus. You have made me numb, and
I hate you for this. I hope I never see
you again. I am not your personal
incubator. Where is the baby, and where
is Galain?" And she also writes about
why Epstein chose her, specifically
saying, quote, "Why me? It makes no
sense. Why my hair and eye color?" She
compares his obsession with creating
what he called a superior gene pool to
Nazi ideology. And she claims she wasn't
the only one and that Epstein fathered
children with several victims. And this
tracks with earlier reporting because in
2019, the New York Times revealed that
Epstein had told scientists and
associates about his ambition to seed
the human race with his DNA by
impregnating women at his vast New
And at the time, it was unclear whether
he'd actually done it. So, we have a
diary submitted as evidence by attorneys
and included in the DOJ's own release
that says he did and that a teenage girl
was impregnated, gave birth, and her
baby was taken away and impregnated
again, miscarried, and wrote about all
of this in a journal that sat in
government files while no one was
prosecuted. And a separate email in the
files from September 2011 addressed to
Epstein congratulates him on welcoming a
baby boy. But Epstein never publicly
acknowledged having any children because
he would have to admit that he
did horrendous things to children. But
this machine didn't run in a vacuum. It
existed inside a social ecosystem of the
most powerful people in the world.
People who visited, people who emailed,
people who flew in on planes and stayed
on the island and took the gifts and
looked the other way. And now, thanks to
these three and a half million pages, we
know exactly who they are and what they
said. But before I get into them, I want
to be clear about something for legal
reasons. You know, being in these files
does not automatically or legally mean
someone committed a crime. Some of these
people may genuinely not have known.
Some of these people may have had
legitimate professional relationships
with Epstein. I'm not a court. I'm not a
prosecutor, but some of these
connections are so deep and so sustained
and so damning that I didn't know stops
being an explanation and starts being an
insult to your intelligence. But I'm
just saying for legal reasons, these are all
all
I mean, I'm reading I'm reading what's
in them. All right? And then you can
just it's up for interpretation. I guess
they're not guilty
as of yet, you know. So with that, let's
start with Donald Trump. Now Donald
Trump appears in the Epstein files
thousands of times, not hundreds,
thousands. And he is one of the most
frequently referenced individuals in
this entire release. And now does that
mean he's guilty of something? Not
necessarily. Okay? And some of those
references are from news clippings, some
third party mentions. But the substance
of references, the ones that actually
matter, paint a picture that is deeply
uncomfortable, especially for a sitting
president of the United States of
America. So here's what's in the files.
So there's an FBI 302, an interview memo
from 2021, and a victim tells the FBI
that Galain Maxwell quote presented her
to Donald Trump at a party. and she
described the introduction as being
quote similar to a CV unquote like a
resume. And she said Maxwell suggested
to Trump that she was quote available.
And the victim told the FBI that nothing
happened and Trump did not act on the
introduction. But the fact that Maxwell
was allegedly presenting girls to him
like items on a menu is a detail that
sits with me kind of wrong, you know.
And there's an email in the files from
2011 in exchange between Epstein and
Maxwell about Virginia Guprey, who we've
talked about on this channel many times
when covering Jeffrey Epstein. And she
is the most prominent Epstein survivor
as of thus far, who was beginning to
speak publicly before her untimely
death. That is extremely suspicious. And
in that email, the person identified as
Gmax, Maxwell's known alias, writes,
quote, I thought you said not to involve
Donald. Involve him in what? What?
Donald, also stupid name now that I'm
just thinking about it right now. Donald
the Sorry if your name's Donald, but in
like involved in a in a in a
conversation, in a legal strategy, in
something else entirely. The email
doesn't say, but the sentence exists and
it's in the files. And Epstein's house
manager testified that Maxwell
approached a girl at Mara Lago, Trump's
own property, for recruitment purposes.
And the files also contain an FBI
spreadsheet from August 2025 that
compiled 12 or more unverified
allegations about Trump drawn from tips
submitted to the bureau. And these
include allegations about so-called
calendar girl auctions and a golf course
trafficking ring. And I want to stress
these are unverified
FBI tips. I'm not saying they're
verified. Just got to cover my tracks.
The FBI itself noted they were
unverified, but they were compiled and
they were in the files. And there's also
a 1994 civil lawsuit from a Jane Doe
alleging that Trump as her at an Epstein
party when she was 13 years old. And I
did cover this in my last video. And the
case was filed, withdrawn, refiled, and
ultimately dropped before trial. And
Trump has denied all allegations related
to Epstein as a whole, as we know. Um,
but here's the thing. You can look at
all of that and say, "Well, you know,
nothing was proven." And that is true,
you know, that's true. Um, but the
reason nothing was proven is that nobody
tried to prove it. And that's kind of
the whole point, you know, and that
brings me to Bill Clinton, another president.
president.
What the is wrong with this country? But
he appears in the files in connection
with at least 16 flights on Epstein's
private plane. 16 that are documented.
By the way, in in a 2016 deposition when
Epstein was asked questions about
Clinton, he invoked the Fifth Amendment
to every single question, which is his
right to to not comment on it. And
there's an email from October of 2009
where socialite Peggy Sigal writes that
Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos were there
at a party hosted by Gain Maxwell. And
the files show an ongoing social
relationship between the Clinton orbit
and Epstein's world that persisted well
beyond what was publicly acknowledged.
And in January of 2026, the US House of
Representatives held Bill in Hillary
Clinton in contempt for failing to
comply with subpoenas related to the
Epstein investigation. And depositions
were scheduled for late February 2026.
And as of the time I am reading this,
those depositions have not yet taken
place. And Clinton has denied any
knowledge of Epstein's crimes. You're
lying in my opinion. Okay. In my
opinion. And now the next name is a name
that a lot of people outside the UK
might not know. And that is Peter
Mandolson. Probably saying that wrong. I
don't really give a He's a former
Secretary of State for Northern Ireland,
a former European Commissioner, one of
the architects of Tony Blair's new labor
movement, and one of the most powerful
political operatives in modern British
history. But Peter appears in the
Epstein Files more than five,000
times. 5,000. And Epstein's 2003
birthday book lists Mandelen as quote,
"My best pal." I hate that. This man I
know is a monster and I'm allowed to say
that. Uh the files contain evidence that
Peter leaked UK tax plans to Epstein. So
confident government information shared
with a convicted offender. And Peter's
partner received £10,000 from Epstein to
fund a osteopathy course. And there's a
photo in the files released to the
public of Peter posing in what has been
described as underwear. And here's what
happened after the files dropped. On
February 1st, 2026, Peter resigned from
the Labor Party. And on February 3rd, he
resigned from the House of Lords. And on
the same day, February 3rd, the
Metropolitan Police in London launched
an active criminal investigation into
Peter in connection with the Epstein
files. And as of right now, Peter is the
only person in the world facing a
criminal investigation as a direct
result of the 2026 document released.
the only one. And it gets so much worse
because we have Prince Andrew next. And
several hundred mentions are in the
files and three photographs that are
going to haunt the British monarchy for
a generation. And in the photos, which
were released as part of the document
dump, Andrew is seen kneeling on all
fours over a woman lying on the floor.
And the woman's face is redacted, but
Andrews is not, thankfully. and he's
staring directly into the camera and in
one image he appears to be touching her
abdomen and there are three photos in
the sequence all undated and the emails
are worse because in August of 2010
Epstein emails someone likely Maxwell
and offers to introduce Andrew to a
quote 26-year-old Russian cleavier
beautiful trustworthy and in September
of 2010 Andrew sends a message
suggesting a dinner at Buckingham Palace
with quote lots of privacy
and Epste responds that they will quote
need/ private time. But Virginia Gup
Fray's FBI 302 from 2013 describes how
she was recruited from Mara Lago, flown
to London and alleges S with Andrew and
he was stripped of all royal titles and
military affiliations in October of 2025
and the UK prime minister has publicly
urged him to cooperate with
investigators and as of February 2026 he
has not done so and I don't know if he
ever will have to. I don't know. And
then there's Howard Lutnik. He is the
current United States Secretary of
Commerce. And he was confirmed to that
position in February 2025. And during
his confirmation hearing, he told
Congress that he had cut off all contact
with Jeffrey Epstein in 2005 after
learning about the allegations. And he
called the relationship a mistake and
said it was over. But the files said
otherwise. and emails from 2011 and
2012, years after Letic claims to have
ended contact, show ongoing
communication between Lutnik and
Epstein. Drinks, visits, social plans,
and in November of 2012, Letic's wife
sent an email referencing a visit to
Epstein's island on a quote 188 ft
yacht. And in November 2015, a full
decade after Letic said he cut ties, he
invited Epstein to a Hillary Clinton
fundraiser that Letic was hosting. Oh,
the Clintons are back as well. Pieces of
[ __ ] So, either the files are
fabricated and the DOJ has given no
indication that they are or the current
Secretary of Commerce lied to Congress
about the nature and duration of his
relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at
this point. A tale as old asing time.
And he has not been asked to resign, by
the way. And he's not been investigated,
by the way. And he also hasn't been
subpoenaed, by the way. And then there's
Steve Bannon. Now, Steve Bannon's
presence in the files is not primarily
about sexual misconduct. It's about
something almost more unsettling, and
that is the sheer cynicism of the people
who run your government. Cuz the files
contain hundreds of text messages
between Bannon and Epstein, many from
the period when Bannon was serving as
chief strategist to President Trump. And
in those texts, Bannon says things about
Trump that are illuminating because he
calls Trump quote unquote out of gas.
And he writes, quote, "Stable genius
bringing himself down." And he brags
about manipulating Trump into policy
decisions, saying, quote, "Dude, I just
got him to pull the trigger on 400
billion in tariffs on China." Unquote
and puppet on a strings. Oh my god.
And he texts Epstein that he quote can't
seem like I'm running Trump's nose in
his own incompetence, unquote. And
there's also nearly 2 hours of video
recorded video of Bannon being
interviewed by Epstein. And the context
and content of the interview haven't
been fully described in reporting, but
the fact that it exists raises an
obvious question. Why was Steve Bannon
sitting for a 2-hour on camera interview
with Jeffrey Epstein? And Epste also
gave Bannon a $1,500
Hermes watch as a gift. Just all kinds
of blackmail going on. That's what I'm
going to assume. And then there's Larry
Summers, former secretary of the
Treasury and former president of Harvard
University. Yeah. And former board
member of Open AI
and one of the most influential
economists of the last 30 years. And in
May 2017, Summers emailed Epstein about
Donald Trump and asked, quote, "How
guilty is Donald?" And Epstein
responded, "Your world does not
understand how dumb he really is."
This man runs the country. Okay. And in
July of 2017, Summers wrote to Epstein,
quote, "I think your friend is mentally
ill," unquote. And these are private
conversations between two men about a
sitting president. And so that alone is
very notable. But the deeper issue is
the relationship itself because Summers
maintained contact with Epstein well
after his 2008 conviction and well after
it was publicly known what Epstein had
done. And since the files were released,
Summers has taken a leave of abstence
from Harvard and stepped down from the
Open AI board. But no investigation, no
subpoenas, no arrest, nothing. And then
we have Crown Princess Met Merritt of
Norway, who is one of the biggest royals
in this list. And the files contain more
than a thousand mentions of Met Merritt.
I'm not saying that right. I don't care.
More than a hundred emails exchanged
between her and Epstein between 2011 and
2014, and she called him quote unquote
sweetheart and soft-hearted and you
tickle my brain. This was after he was
he he he the allegations already came
out about him, by the way. And Epstein
responded to her calling her quote
twisted with a winky face, not a typical
royalty unquote. And in one exchange,
Epstein wrote, quote, Paris good for
adultery, scandis better wife material.
unquote. And in another, he asked about
quote, "wo naked women carrying
surfboard for my 15-year-old son's wallpaper."
wallpaper."
Ew. So, the crown princess of Norway was
in regular communication with a
convicted offender who was making
comments about naked women in the
context of her 15-year-old son. And that
communication continued for years. And
the files also show that she stayed for
4 days at Epstein's Palm Beach estate in
2013. The same house where the FBI
documented the messages, the vibrators,
the $100 bills on the nightstands, etc.
And the house the victims called the
villa. And she stayed there for 4 days.
And since the files dropped, she has
issued a public apology. Oh, that makes
up for it. And there are growing calls
in Norway for her to renounce her right
to become queen. and the Norwegian
public is not satisfied. And now I want
to spend a moment on Kathy Rumler
because she's not a household name by
any means, but her story captures
something about how Epstein operated
within elite circles. So Rumler was the
White House counsel under President
Obama and she later became the chief
legal officer at Goldman Sachs and she
is one of the most connected legal minds
in Washington. So in December of 2015,
she emailed Epstein and called him quote
wonderful Jeffrey. I adore him and said
having Epstein in her life was like
having another older brother. And the
files show that Epstein booked and paid
for a first class trip to Europe for
her. And in October 2014, when she was
considering whether to accept a
nomination for US Attorney General, she
sent Epstein a draft of her statement
declining the position and asked for his
quote thoughts. And she sent a draft
statement about the attorney general
nomination to Jeffrey Epstein for
review. But here's the kicker. Epstein's
estate was asserted attorney client
privilege over hundreds of their emails.
Meaning they claim Rumler was acting as
Epstein's lawyer during at least some of
this correspondence. Which, if true,
means the former White House counsel and
future Goldman Sachs chief legal officer
was providing legal services to a
convicted child offender and trafficker
while publicly maintaining no meaningful
relationship with him, quote unquote.
That's disturbing. But all of these
people have the same thing. They have
ongoing long relationships, long
year-long relationships with this man.
And it's not like a quick little
encounter. That's why I'm going over
these specific people because it's not
just a one-off. It is years of evidence.
And most of them are still in power and
have had no repercussions as of right
now. But we haven't even gotten to the
billionaires. So let's get into that.
Starting with numero uno, Elon Musk,
because this one is a masterclass in
getting caught in a lie. So, in
September of 2025, months before the big
document release, Elon Musk posted on X,
his platform, the following statement.
Quote, "Epstein tried to get me to go to
his island and I refused." All caps. All
caps. Refused. Definitive. End of story.
Nice, Elon. But here's what the emails
have to say. Because on November 25th,
2012, Epstein emails Musk and asks how
many people he'll be bringing for quote
the heli to Ireland. That's the
helicopter to Little St. James,
Epstein's private island. And Musk
responds, quote, "Probably just Tula and
me." Tula Riley, which was his wife at
the time. And then Musk asks a follow-up
question, and I need you to hear this
one clearly. Quote, "What day/night will
be the wildest party on your island?"
That's a direct quote from Elon Musk to
Jeffrey Epstein about his island in
2012. And on Christmas Day of the same
year, Musk emails again and he writes,
"He's been quote working to the edge of
his sanity this year and so once my kids
head home after Christmas, I really want
to hit the party scene in St. Barts or
elsewhere and let loose unquote." And he
adds that a peaceful island experience
is quote the opposite of what I'm
looking for.
Guy wants to get wild. I can't even
imagine what he wants to do. That's
that's all alleged and up in the air.
But in December of 2013, another email
comes up and Musk writes, "We'll be in
the BVI St. Barts area over the
holidays. Is there a good time to
visit?" And Epste replies, quote,
"Always space for you." And then the
follow-up, quote, I will come and get
you. So, did Musk actually go to the
island? The files don't confirm it
definitively, but the emails confirm
beyond any reasonable doubt that Musk
was not only invited, he was actively
trying to coordinate a visit to the
wildest party of the year.
I can't. They're all liars. Everyone's
Everyone's a liar. And no one asked Musk
about this under oath. No one has
subpoenaed him, and no one has done
anything at all. And no one probably
will. But then we come to Bill Gates and
he's probably the biggest one as of
right now because it's a complicated
picture and it's nasty. And it just got
more complicated because this week both
Bill and his ex-wife Melinda have now
spoken publicly about what's in the
files. And what they're saying paints
very different pictures. And I'm just
going to say I believe his wife. I
believe his ex-wife. But let me start
with what's in the documents. So, in
Epstein's email account, there are draft
messages from July 2013, unscent,
written by Epstein to himself. And that
read like a man documenting leverage,
blackmail, if you will, even though the
FBI won't acknowledge that cuz I don't
know. But one is styled as a resignation
letter from the Gates Foundation, and
the other is addressed to Dear Bill. And
both are full of typos, uh, stream of
consciousness, and it's very just raw.
And the content is explosive because
Epstein claims that in his role as
Gates, his words right hand, he had been
asked to do things ranging from the
morally inappropriate to the ethically
unsound. And he gets very specific and
he writes about quote helping Bill to
get drugs in order to deal with
consequences of with Russian girls
unquote girls, not women, girls. and
about quote facilitating his illicit
trrists with married women unquote and
about being asked to provide aderall.
And then there's this line. Epstein
writes, quote, to add insult to injury,
you then implore me to please delete the
emails regarding your STD, your request
that I provide you antibiotics that you
can surreptitiously give to Melinda and
the description of your penis."
So just just let that sink in. Epstein
is claiming in an email to himself that
Bill Gates contracted an STD, came to
Epstein for help getting antibiotics,
and wanted to secretly give those
antibiotics to his wife so she wouldn't
find out that he was sleeping with
Russian girls and other married women.
So, we don't know if these emails were
actually ever sent to Bill. That is
unclear. They were drafts sent from
Epstein's account back to his own
account. So the question is if these are
true and two people just answered it
differently. So on February 4th, Bill
Gates broke his silence and in an
interview with 9 News Australia, he
said, quote, "Apparently Jeffree wrote
an email to himself. That email was
never sent. The email is false." And he
said, "I don't know what his thinking
was there. Was he trying to attack me in
some way? And then every minute I spent
with him, I regret and I apologize that
I did that." unquote. I don't believe
you. Yeah, I don't believe you. And he
said he met Epstein in 2011, had dinners
with him over three years to discuss
getting rich people to donate to global
health and called it a dead end. And he
said those exact words and he said,
quote, "I never went to the island. I
never met any women." And he called
himself foolish and said he was one of
many people who regret ever knowing him.
So that's his story that the emails are
false and Epstein was a liar and it was
all about philanthropy dinners. End of
story. But the day before Gates went on
Australian television, his ex-wife went
on NPR and she told a very different
story. And Melinda French Gates sat down
with NPR's Wildcard podcast and said her
reaction to seeing Bill's name in the
files was one of quote sad, just
unbelievable sadness. and she said the
details quote bring back memories of
some very very painful times in my marriage.
marriage.
>> And I am so happy to be away from all
the muck
>> that was there.
>> And then she said something that if
you're Bill Gates should keep you up at
night. And she said, quote, "Whatever
questions remain there, I can't even
begin to know all of it." Those
questions are for those people and for
even my ex-husband. they need to answer
to those things, not me. So, she did not
defend him. She didn't echo his denial.
She said, "He needs to answer for it."
And she called it muk. And she pointedly
said, "Not me." As in, "This is his
problem now." And then she turned it
back to the victims and she said, "No
girl should ever be put in the situation
that they were put in by Epstein and
whatever was going on with all of the
various people around him. I mean, it's
just it's beyond heartbreaking, right? I
remember being those ages those girls
were. I remember my daughters being
those ages, right? So um for me it's
personally hard whenever those details
come up right because um brings back
memories of some very very painful times
in my marriage but I have moved on from
that and she previously describes
Epstein as abhorrent and evil
personified. She said she met him once
and had nightmares and her husband had
dinners with him for 3 years. So, the
day after Melinda's interview aired,
Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace
wrote to the chairman of the House
Oversight Committee asking him to
subpoena Bill Gates. And she wrote,
quote, "I have questions for Bill Gates
about Epstein." So, here's where we are.
Epste wrote draft emails claiming he
helped Gates cover up an STD, gets
drugs, and arrange encounters with
women. And Gates says it's all false,
and his ex-wife won't back him up and
says he needs to answer for it. and
sitting congresswoman wants him under
oath. And the bigger question, the one
nobody wants to ask out loud, is this,
if Epstein was keeping this kind of
information about Bill Gates, one of the
richest people in the world, as
leverage, who else was he doing that to?
Because that's what this looks like. Not
just a social network, a blackmail
operation with receipts. So, next on our
list is Steve Tish, and he is one of the
co-owners of the New York Giants and a
major Hollywood producer. And he's not
as wellknown as Musker Gates, but his
emails with Epstein are some of the most
revealing in the entire release because
they show you in real time exactly how
Epstein operated as a social middleman
for women. So, in 2013, Tish emailed
Epstein about a woman he'd met at
Epstein's house and called her a very
sweet girl.
And then he asked Epstein a question
that tells you everything. He says,
quote, "Pro or civilian?" Unquote. Pro
or civilian? Was this woman a worker or
not? That's the question you ask about
someone you met at Jeffrey Epstein's
house, just casually over email. And
Epstein described the woman as quote
civilian but Russian and rarely tells
the full truth, but funqu
does that mean? And in another exchange
from June 2013, Epstein emails Tish
saying, "You should be in New York this
week, have new present," unquote. And
Tish asks, "Is my present in NYC?" And
Epstein later describes the woman he's
going to introduce to Tish to as Tahiton
speaks mostly French, exotic," unquote.
And Tish asks if she's a working girl,
and Epstein responds, "Never."
Just gives me all kinds of ick. So, he's
describing women like items on a menu,
and Tish is asking about pricing. And
Tish's public response was, quote, "We
had a brief association where we
exchanged emails about adult women,"
unquote. And he says he never took
Epstein up on any invitations and never
went to the island, so maybe that is
true. But the emails are right there,
and the language in them is the language
of a man who understood exactly what
Epstein was offering and was comfortable
enough to ask clarifying questions. And
next up, we have Sir Richard Branson,
the founder of Virgin Group,
billionaire, philanthropist, and owner
of his own Caribbean island. So, in
2013, Branson emailed Epstein an
invitation to visit his island and
wrote, quote, "Anytime you're in the
area, we'd love to see you as long as
you bring your herm." And for those of
you who don't know, I had to look it up
personally. A her is a domestic space
that is reserved for the women of the
house in a Muslim family. Uh and like
the slang version is a group of women
associated with one man often humorously
or faciciously a significant group of
people surrounding someone or a specific
anime or manga genre where a protagonist
is pursued by multiple love interests.
So whatever way you're looking at it,
it's a group of women essentially. So he
said this to a then convicted offender
in 2013, 5 years after Epstein's first
conviction. And Branson wasn't just
socializing, he was advising. And in a
separate exchange, Branson counseledled
Epstein on how to rehabilitate his
public image. and his suggestion was to
get Bill Gates to go on record saying
Epstein had been a brilliant adviser and
had more than learned your lesson and
have done nothing that is against the
law since. So all these these are just
all evil people just trying to figure
out what can we do what can we do to to
make it seem like we're not evil pieces
of demon [ __ ] But Virgin Group put out
a statement saying that the word harum
referred to three adult women from
Epstein's team and that Branson was just
repeating a term Epstein had used. Okay,
sure. All right. Whatever helps you
sleep at night. And they also said
Branson eventually declined a charitable
donation from Epstein and chose not to
meet with him again after his team
uncovered serious allegations. Okay,
sure. But here's my problem with that.
In 2013, when Branson wrote that email,
Epstein's serious allegations weren't
hidden. They were public and they had
been for years. And Epstein had already
been convicted and he had already served
time. So, the entire world knew what he
was. And Richard Branson was emailing
him about her and offering PR advice.
So, I see you, Richard. And next up, we
have Peter Aia. Now, he's a celebrity
longevity doctor and he's been on every
podcast, pretty much. Not mine, though.
Thank God. And he's a CBS News medical
contributor, and he wrote a best-selling
book about living longer. And he's got
millions of followers who trust him with
their health. And his emails with
Epstein are something else. Because in
February 19th, 2016, late at night, Aia
writes to Epstein, and I'm going to read
this verbatim as per usual. quote is
indeed low carb. Still awaiting results
on gluten content though unquote. And
you know, could just be a disgusting
email. They like two guys, two
at least one predator and one potential
one just talking and gabbing. And it
doesn't necessarily mean they're talking
about a younger person, but if you're
talking Epstein at this point, I don't
think you're a good person, you know?
Not to mention this was in 2016 now, so
he's so he knows who Jeffrey is and what
he does. And in another email to
Epstein's assistant, Aia says he goes
into withdrawal if he doesn't see
Epstein. And in June 2015, under the
subject line, got a fresh shipment. This
is where it gets bad. This is where I
stop giving him any sort of benefit of
the doubt. AIA wrote, quote, "The
biggest problem with becoming friends
with you, the life you lead is so
outrageous, and yet I can't tell a soul."
soul."
What's so outrageous, Peter? You know,
what can't you tell anyone? Uh, that
makes you look extremely suspicious. And
Aia posted an apology on X after the
files dropped. And he said the emails
were embarrassing. He clarified that
fresh shipment referred to Metformin, a
diabetes medication for my own use. No,
I don't believe you. I just don't
believe you. Um, and he did not explain
the mail because that one she can't
really can't really uh unexplain that.
And he did not explain what about
Epstein's life was so outrageous. And he
did not explain why it had to be a
secret either. So, looking at you too,
Peter. And that brings us to our next
person, Peggy Seagal. And she is a New
York socialite and film publicist. And
she's the kind of person most people
have never heard of, but who exists at
the center of a very specific world. The
world where money, media, and access
intersect. And her emails with Epstein
are a window into how casually grotesque
that world can be. Because in 2009 while
planning a trip to Kenya, Seagal wrote
to Epstein, quote, "Bring a little baby
back for you or two, boys or girls. So
Madonna," unquote. I have no words, but
in context, this could be a tasteless
joke about celebrity adoption. Sure, a
reference to Madonna's adoption of
children from Malawi. Uh, that's the
most charitable reading for you, but
you're making that joke to Jeffrey
Epstein in 2009. And the joke is about
acquiring children, boys or girls. And
in the same email chain, Seagal boasted
about plans to photograph herself in mud
huts and pretend she had crashed the
Winter White House and posed with
Obama's relatives. Who is this woman?
And she also wrote a New Year's Eve
recap from St. Bart's named dropping
Paul McCartney, George Lucas, Harvey
Weinstein, and Robert Downey Jr. And in
a separate 2009 email, after leaving a
party at Galain Maxwell's house, Seagal
casually dropped, quote, "Bill Clinton
and Jeff Bezos were there." So, this is
the ecosystem. This is this is what it
looks like. A publicist making baby
jokes with a pedophile while named
dropping presidents and billionaires at
parties hosted by his co-conspirator.
And everyone just
just went like this.
What are you going to do? So, that
brings us to our next piece of [ __ ]
Woody Allen. Now, Woody Allen appears in
the Epstein files more than 7,000 times,
and he had over aundred documented
meetings with Epstein between 2014 and
2019, and he took at least nine flights
on Epstein's planes. And this is after
Epstein's conviction, after the plea
deal, after the entire world knew. And
in a 2012 email, someone joking with
Epstein about a trip to Paris asked if
they're heading to, and I quote, "Lay
ped a convention
want to throw up." And Allen's
spokesperson had said he never had
business meetings with Epstein and that
his wife, Suni, was always present.
Sununi, by the way, is Woody Allen's
adopted daughter, who he allegedly did
things to when she was a child,
allegedly, and now he's married to her.
So, I already don't like Woody Allen.
Let's just keep that. I don't care if I
I mean, I I I can't say that anybody's
guilty here, but but to have around a
100red meetings in 5 years is not a
casual acquaintance, and you can't
convince me otherwise. Woody, you piece
of [ __ ] But here's where I want to
pause on because it's not just the
names, it's the language in these
emails, it's the tone, it's how
comfortable these people were. And
nobody in these emails sounds shocked
and nobody sounds confused. And nobody
writes back and says, "What do you mean
by that?" or "I don't want any part of
this." They write back and ask follow-up
questions. They ask if the girl is pro
or civilian. They ask about the wildest
party. They describe women by
nationality and attractiveness like
they're ordering off a menu. And they
joke about conventions and they write
boys or girls to a offender, a convicted
offender planning a trip to Africa. And
the word that keeps coming up over and
over in Epstein's own emails, more than
400 times, by the way, is whoops. And
someone writes that they're giving
Epstein permission to kill someone who
lied to them both. Then he learns about
the alleged s allegations of a young
woman and he writes, "Whoops." And he
hears that Mary Kennedy has died, Robert
F. Kennedy Jr.'s second wife, who later
died by
somebody not doing it themselves, if you
know what I mean. And he writes,
"Whoops." And he learns that Sultan
Binsion's mother-in-law has died also.
Whoops. 400 times the same word in
response to death, violence, and essay.
like a man who had been doing terrible
things so long that the only emotional
register he had left was a smirk. And
then there are the emails to the victims
themselves. Because the files don't just
show us how Epstein talked to the
powerful, they show us how he talked to
girls. And in August 2009, Epstein wrote
to a woman, quote, "It would be nice if
when I ask you to rub my head or my
feet, you actually did it for more than
10 minutes without thinking about
something else." unquote. And in another
exchange, he writes, quote, "I loved the
torture video," unquote. And he advised
a woman to take antibiotics because
she'd had many in just a few weeks.
But this is what's happening behind the
private emails. While billionaires were
asking about the wildest parties and
socialites were joking about bringing
back babies from Kenya, this is the
other side of those conversations. This
is what the machine was doing to real
people. And here's the thing that ties
all of this together is that every
single person I just mentioned, every
one of them is walking free today with
no charges, no subpoenas, and no
investigations. And most of them haven't
even been asked a question under oath.
And the emails are right there in the
files on a government website for anyone
to read. It's almost like they're
rubbing it in our faces. And I don't
even know what to think about it because
the system saw all of this and it
documented all of it and then it was
decided it just it wasn't enough to do
anything. Well, can't do anything about
it. Arrest them. I don't know.
Investigate. I don't know. So, Congress
passed a law demanding transparency and
the president signed it and the DOJ was
ordered to release the files and they
did eventually. But the way they did it
caused a second wave of harm, not to the
powerful men in those emails, but to the
victims themselves. The system failed
these women and girls for 20 years. And
then it was finally forced to show its
work. And it failed them again. In the
timeline, November 18th, 2025, the House
passes the Epstein Files Transparency
Act 427 to1. One, no vote. Klay Higgins
of Louisiana, I'm staring at you.
bombastic side eye. But the Senate
passes it unanimously and Trump signs it
November 19th and the law gives the DOJ
30 days. So December 19th arrives and
the DOJ puts out a batch and it's a
joke. as we know over 500 pages of solid
black rectangles and entire documents
unreadable just by partisan fury and
then it gets absurd because within hours
people on social media discover the
redaction technique is broken and the
black bars on the digital PDFs aren't
permanent. You could copy and paste the
hidden text into a word document and
read it. So, the redactions were
cosmetic, not functional, and the flaw
was traced to a 2021 court filing from
the Virgin Islands Attorney General's
Office that the DOJ had incorporated
without reprocessing. And among the
content recovered from behind those
broken redactions was an unverified FBI
tip alleging Trump had witnessed the
killing and disposal of an infant born
to a 13-year-old trafficking victim. Unverified,
Unverified,
by the way. So the FBI documented it
without corroborating it, but the DOJ
had specifically redacted it and their
own incompetence made it public anyway.
And by January 5th, less than 1% of the
files had been released. And the DOJ
then announced it had discovered an
additional 1 million documents it hadn't
accounted for. Oh wow. Where did they
go? You know, did they fall under the
desk? In January 30th, 42 days past the
legal deadline, the big batch drops. 3
million pages,
180,000 images, and 2,000 videos. And
Deputy AG Todd Blanch declares full
compliance, except the DOJ admitted in
its own letters to Congress that it
identified approximately 6 million pages
responsive to the act, but it released 3
million. So that's half and the other
half was withheld citing attorney client
privilege, grand jury secrecy and child
material and duplicates and just
unrelated material. And representative
Roana went public with what was still
missing. FBI 302 victim interview
statements, the full draft indictment
and prosecution memo from 2007 and
hundreds of thousands of emails from
Epstein's computers, grand jury
materials from the SDNY case. and he
wrote, quote, "Failing to release these
files only shields the powerful
individuals who were involved and hurts
the public's trust in our institutions."
That's gone. There's not no trust, by
the way. You can't break it anymore. So,
but all of that is bureaucratic failure.
What happened to the victims is
betrayal. Because when the DOJ released
those 3 million pages, they published on
a public government website accessible
to anyone in the world, dozens of
unredacted nude photographs of women and
girls victimized by Epstein. And the
Wall Street Journal found that 43 of the
47 victim names were left completely
unredacted. And at least one woman who
had never previously been identified as
an Epstein victim was publicly outed for
the first time by the DOJ's own release.
And attorneys representing more than 200
survivors filed an emergency motion
calling it quote the single most
egregious violation of victim privacy in
one day in United States history. And
Ton Blanch defended the process and
redaction errors affected about 0.001% 001%
001% unquote of materials, he said. But 3
unquote of materials, he said. But 3 million pages at even a tenth of a
million pages at even a tenth of a percent is 3,000 pages of exposed victim
percent is 3,000 pages of exposed victim information. And publishing even one
information. And publishing even one nude photo of one survivor on a
nude photo of one survivor on a government website is incalculable
government website is incalculable damage. And Annie Farmer, who testified
damage. And Annie Farmer, who testified against Epstein and helped convict
against Epstein and helped convict Galain Maxwell, said the failures were
Galain Maxwell, said the failures were really disgusting. Then she said
really disgusting. Then she said something that cuts to the heart of all
something that cuts to the heart of all of it. Quote, "There's just no
of it. Quote, "There's just no explanation for how it could have been
explanation for how it could have been done so poorly. They've had victims
done so poorly. They've had victims names for a very long time. I don't
names for a very long time. I don't think this is just about rushing to get
think this is just about rushing to get this information out." And Danielle
this information out." And Danielle Bensky, another survivor, discovered
Bensky, another survivor, discovered that confidential conversation she'd had
that confidential conversation she'd had with the FBI investigators had been
with the FBI investigators had been included in the document dump without
included in the document dump without her knowledge and without her consent.
her knowledge and without her consent. And a group of Epstein accusers released
And a group of Epstein accusers released a joint statement saying, quote, "As
a joint statement saying, quote, "As survivors, we should never be the ones
survivors, we should never be the ones named, scrutinized, and retraumatized
named, scrutinized, and retraumatized while Epstein's enablers continue to
while Epstein's enablers continue to benefit from secrecy."
benefit from secrecy." Yeah, of course. Like, the fact that
Yeah, of course. Like, the fact that they even had to say that is so
they even had to say that is so incredibly sad. But that whole sentence
incredibly sad. But that whole sentence is the whole story. The co-conspirators
is the whole story. The co-conspirators got blackout identities. Three people
got blackout identities. Three people named in a 60count indictment are still
named in a 60count indictment are still anonymous somehow. But the girls who got
anonymous somehow. But the girls who got abused, their names were published on a
abused, their names were published on a government website because nobody at the
government website because nobody at the DOJ bothered to check. Like what is this
DOJ bothered to check. Like what is this world? And the public, as I've said,
world? And the public, as I've said, we're not fooled. You know, a CNN poll
we're not fooled. You know, a CNN poll from January 2026 found that 6% 6% of
from January 2026 found that 6% 6% of Americans were satisfied with what the
Americans were satisfied with what the government released. And knowing the
government released. And knowing the government and their up polls, I'm
government and their up polls, I'm assuming it's 0%. Maybe it's like
assuming it's 0%. Maybe it's like 0.006%.
0.006%. But even even the fact that it's that
But even even the fact that it's that it's 6% is crazy. But it's universal.
it's 6% is crazy. But it's universal. And 49% said they were dissatisfied. And
And 49% said they were dissatisfied. And 2/3 said they believe the government is
2/3 said they believe the government is deliberately withholding information.
deliberately withholding information. I'm going to say 100%. I'm going to say
I'm going to say 100%. I'm going to say your polls are rigged and it's 100% of
your polls are rigged and it's 100% of us are are not satisfied at all and
us are are not satisfied at all and we're disgusted and we need to just just
we're disgusted and we need to just just rinse this all out. Rinse all you guys
rinse this all out. Rinse all you guys out. get some new people in or I I don't
out. get some new people in or I I don't even know. I don't even know. Got to be
even know. I don't even know. Got to be careful with what I say right now. But a
careful with what I say right now. But a separate economist/youuggov poll found
separate economist/youuggov poll found 49% believe Trump is attempting to cover
49% believe Trump is attempting to cover up Epstein's crimes.
up Epstein's crimes. What? Of course. Again, it's 100% at
What? Of course. Again, it's 100% at this point. What are these polls? I
this point. What are these polls? I didn't get asked. Who asked me? Nobody.
didn't get asked. Who asked me? Nobody. Hey, let's put a poll up. How many of
Hey, let's put a poll up. How many of you guys I bet 100% of you guys would
you guys I bet 100% of you guys would say that you're displeased and you think
say that you're displeased and you think Trump's trying to cover up? I'm pretty
Trump's trying to cover up? I'm pretty sure. And a Ruters poll from December
sure. And a Ruters poll from December 2025 found only 23% approved of Trump's
2025 found only 23% approved of Trump's handling of the case. I'm sure it's very
handling of the case. I'm sure it's very different now. And when Blanch says
different now. And when Blanch says there was nothing in there that allowed
there was nothing in there that allowed us to prosecute anybody, the public is
us to prosecute anybody, the public is looking at the same files and arriving
looking at the same files and arriving at a very different conclusion. It's 6%.
at a very different conclusion. It's 6%. That's how much faith the American
That's how much faith the American public has in this process. And I don't
public has in this process. And I don't even believe that number. I think it's
even believe that number. I think it's zero, personally. And also, here's the
zero, personally. And also, here's the thing about releasing 3 and 12 million
thing about releasing 3 and 12 million pages. Some are FBI interview records
pages. Some are FBI interview records with credible witnesses. And some are
with credible witnesses. And some are emails from Epstein's servers. And some
emails from Epstein's servers. And some are tips that random members of the
are tips that random members of the public called into the FBI over 20
public called into the FBI over 20 years. Documented, filed, and apparently
years. Documented, filed, and apparently never investigated. Shocking, I know.
never investigated. Shocking, I know. And all of it has been dumped into the
And all of it has been dumped into the same release with no clear labeling,
same release with no clear labeling, which is so
which is so intentional, you know? It it just it
intentional, you know? It it just it allows all of us to create our own
allows all of us to create our own narrative and to mix up things and to
narrative and to mix up things and to make it seem like we're crazy for
make it seem like we're crazy for thinking these things, but whatever. In
thinking these things, but whatever. In a press release accompanying the January
a press release accompanying the January 30th dump, quote, "This production may
30th dump, quote, "This production may include fake or falsely submitted
include fake or falsely submitted images, documents, or videos, as
images, documents, or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI was
everything that was sent to the FBI was the public was included in the
the public was included in the production that is responsive to the
production that is responsive to the act." unquote. So, every anonymous tip
act." unquote. So, every anonymous tip and every fabricated document someone
and every fabricated document someone mailed to the bureau mixed in with real
mailed to the bureau mixed in with real evidence and the DOJ did not distinguish
evidence and the DOJ did not distinguish between them. That ising
between them. That ising disgusting
disgusting and horrible practice. So, we're looking
and horrible practice. So, we're looking at all of these images and emails and
at all of these images and emails and everything and they're like, some of
everything and they're like, some of them could be fake, by the way, just
them could be fake, by the way, just covering our own asses.
covering our own asses. I have so many things to say, but I
I have so many things to say, but I can't say it because
can't say it because you know what, you know. But let's talk
you know what, you know. But let's talk about the yacht allegations. So, there's
about the yacht allegations. So, there's a document referencing a party on a
a document referencing a party on a yacht and the allegations are extreme
yacht and the allegations are extreme claims about people eating feces from
claims about people eating feces from intestines. Allegations against George
intestines. Allegations against George Bush. one an account accusing Bill
Bush. one an account accusing Bill Clinton and George HW Bush of doing
Clinton and George HW Bush of doing horrible things to a boy on a yacht with
horrible things to a boy on a yacht with Epstein in 2000. And these have been
Epstein in 2000. And these have been shared millions of times. And here's
shared millions of times. And here's what the files tell us about the source.
what the files tell us about the source. The person described the event as quote
The person described the event as quote recovered repressed memories unquote
recovered repressed memories unquote that surfaced after beginning therapy in
that surfaced after beginning therapy in 2016. And FBI agents noted that
2016. And FBI agents noted that individual was quote emotionally
individual was quote emotionally unbalanced though not intoxicated
unbalanced though not intoxicated unquote. And the FBI documented the
unquote. And the FBI documented the claims and according to the release did
claims and according to the release did not expand the investigation eating
not expand the investigation eating feces out of intestines. And yes, it's
feces out of intestines. And yes, it's an allegation. It is not 100%. Why would
an allegation. It is not 100%. Why would that not be investigated? But they
that not be investigated? But they didn't because they come from a single
didn't because they come from a single source whose credibility the FBI itself
source whose credibility the FBI itself flagged. So, there is a meaningful
flagged. So, there is a meaningful difference between this and the draft
difference between this and the draft indictment and the employee testimony or
indictment and the employee testimony or the Musk emails. One is verified
the Musk emails. One is verified documentary evidence and the other is a
documentary evidence and the other is a tip the FBI didn't find credible enough
tip the FBI didn't find credible enough to pursue. But
to pursue. But just going to say it, I just at this
just going to say it, I just at this point it's horrible, but I wouldn't be
point it's horrible, but I wouldn't be shocked. I'm not shocked at I I don't
shocked. I'm not shocked at I I don't know. I I just fully think these people
know. I I just fully think these people are evil. like
are evil. like the epitome of evil. And next we have
the epitome of evil. And next we have Gabriella Rico Himenez. So in 2009, a
Gabriella Rico Himenez. So in 2009, a 21-year-old Mexican model named
21-year-old Mexican model named Gabriella Rico Jimenez was filmed
Gabriella Rico Jimenez was filmed outside the Fiesta in Hotel in Montter,
outside the Fiesta in Hotel in Montter, Mexico. And visibly hysterical,
Mexico. And visibly hysterical, screaming, "They ate humans. They smell
screaming, "They ate humans. They smell like human flesh."
>> She allegedly just left a private party at the hotel. And according to available
at the hotel. And according to available accounts, she was never seen again. And
accounts, she was never seen again. And police described it as a mental
police described it as a mental breakdown. But after the Epstein files
breakdown. But after the Epstein files dropped in January 2026, her video went
dropped in January 2026, her video went massively viral. And social media users
massively viral. And social media users connected her claims to the release,
connected her claims to the release, suggesting the documents contain
suggesting the documents contain evidence of cannibalism among global
evidence of cannibalism among global elites. But here is what the reporting
elites. But here is what the reporting actually shows. No substantiated
actually shows. No substantiated evidence in the official DOJ release
evidence in the official DOJ release directly confirms her claims. and major
directly confirms her claims. and major news organizations like CNN, PBS, BBC,
news organizations like CNN, PBS, BBC, AP have not reported a verified
AP have not reported a verified connection between the files and her
connection between the files and her 2009 incident. And the connection is
2009 incident. And the connection is being made by social media users, not by
being made by social media users, not by investigators who reviewed the
investigators who reviewed the documents. The video is real, and her
documents. The video is real, and her fear may have been genuine, but sharing
fear may have been genuine, but sharing unverified claims as fact gives the
unverified claims as fact gives the powerful people in these files an escape
powerful people in these files an escape hatch, so we need to be careful. Am I
hatch, so we need to be careful. Am I saying that they've never done anything
saying that they've never done anything like that?
like that? I don't know.
I don't know. Again,
Again, I don't know what to think anymore, but
I don't know what to think anymore, but every time someone posts something
every time someone posts something unverified as proven, it gives Leutnik
unverified as proven, it gives Leutnik and Musk and everyone else a reason to
and Musk and everyone else a reason to wave their hand and say, "See, it's all
wave their hand and say, "See, it's all internet nonsense." But the emails are
internet nonsense." But the emails are real and the indictment is real and the
real and the indictment is real and the victim testimony is real. So, don't hand
victim testimony is real. So, don't hand these people an out. You know, we can
these people an out. You know, we can speculate all we want, but don't post
speculate all we want, but don't post things that aren't proven as proven. You
things that aren't proven as proven. You know, it could it could be like this may
know, it could it could be like this may have happened, but it it really does
have happened, but it it really does give them a leg up. It's so wrong. It's
give them a leg up. It's so wrong. It's so wrong. It's so wrong that we have to
so wrong. It's so wrong that we have to police ourselves um to keep the
police ourselves um to keep the government in check, you know. And next,
government in check, you know. And next, we have the fake wife and the email. So,
we have the fake wife and the email. So, some things in the files sound like
some things in the files sound like conspiracy theories, but are actually
conspiracy theories, but are actually documented. And in May 2016, a woman
documented. And in May 2016, a woman named Margarita writes to Epstein
named Margarita writes to Epstein asking, quote, "Do you still need a fake
asking, quote, "Do you still need a fake wife?" unquote. She's found a Russian
wife?" unquote. She's found a Russian woman who is quote Jewish and
woman who is quote Jewish and trustworthy unquote and looking for a
trustworthy unquote and looking for a job. And that email is real. And in
job. And that email is real. And in March 15th, 2018, an email with the
March 15th, 2018, an email with the subject line, "He has passed away."
subject line, "He has passed away." Epstein writes about Gain Maxwell's
Epstein writes about Gain Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell, speculating that
father, Robert Maxwell, speculating that Robert had threatened Israel's
Robert had threatened Israel's intelligence agency, MSAD, after
intelligence agency, MSAD, after allegedly working as an informal agent
allegedly working as an informal agent spying on the UK, the US, and the Soviet
spying on the UK, the US, and the Soviet Union. And Robert Maxwell's body was
Union. And Robert Maxwell's body was found floating off the Canary Islands in
found floating off the Canary Islands in 1991. And his death has been the subject
1991. And his death has been the subject of conspiracy theories for over 30
of conspiracy theories for over 30 years. And when the real documents
years. And when the real documents contain emails about fake wives and msad
contain emails about fake wives and msad threats, the line between conspiracy
threats, the line between conspiracy theory and documented correspondents
theory and documented correspondents gets very blurry and just makes me think
gets very blurry and just makes me think it's real, you know. But here's what I
it's real, you know. But here's what I am genuinely just I mean, I'm losing
am genuinely just I mean, I'm losing sleep over all of this. It is it's very
sleep over all of this. It is it's very hard to report and document without
hard to report and document without being very emotional. So, I'm trying my
being very emotional. So, I'm trying my best. Um, and if I don't seem to upset
best. Um, and if I don't seem to upset enough, it's because I'm trying to hold
enough, it's because I'm trying to hold it together to make it through this
it together to make it through this video. But what really keeps me up is is
video. But what really keeps me up is is what is in the files, but it's also
what is in the files, but it's also what's not. You know, the DOJ identified
what's not. You know, the DOJ identified six million pages and released 3
six million pages and released 3 million. Half of everything is still
million. Half of everything is still withheld. And based on what lawmakers
withheld. And based on what lawmakers have said publicly, the missing pages
have said publicly, the missing pages include what I stated before, victim
include what I stated before, victim interview statements, the actual records
interview statements, the actual records from FBI conversations with Epstein's
from FBI conversations with Epstein's victims, many still withheld, and the
victims, many still withheld, and the full unredacted draft indictment and
full unredacted draft indictment and prosecution memo from the 2007 Florida
prosecution memo from the 2007 Florida investigation and hundreds of thousands
investigation and hundreds of thousands of emails from Epstein's personal
of emails from Epstein's personal computers. So, we've only seen little
computers. So, we've only seen little tiny fragments and the rest remains
tiny fragments and the rest remains unreleased. Grand jury materials from
unreleased. Grand jury materials from the SDNY case, the federal case that was
the SDNY case, the federal case that was active when Epstein died is under seal.
active when Epstein died is under seal. And who are who the [ __ ] are these three
And who are who the [ __ ] are these three co-conspirators in the draft indictment?
co-conspirators in the draft indictment? 60 counts, 19 victims, four defendants.
60 counts, 19 victims, four defendants. We know one was Epstein and the other
We know one was Epstein and the other three are still redacted
three are still redacted and not arrested or or investigated.
and not arrested or or investigated. What is going on? And the first person
What is going on? And the first person to contact the FBI about Epstein was
to contact the FBI about Epstein was Maria Farmer in September of 1996. And
Maria Farmer in September of 1996. And she reported child S. And she gave them
she reported child S. And she gave them information. And the FBI documented the
information. And the FBI documented the call and then nothing for a decade. And
call and then nothing for a decade. And Epstein wasn't arrested until 2006, 10
Epstein wasn't arrested until 2006, 10 years after Maria Farmer told the FBI
years after Maria Farmer told the FBI what he was doing. And 27 girls
what he was doing. And 27 girls identified in Palm Beach and then 19
identified in Palm Beach and then 19 Jane Doe's in the indictment. So,
Jane Doe's in the indictment. So, hundreds, possibly thousands of victims
hundreds, possibly thousands of victims across multiple countries. And the clock
across multiple countries. And the clock started in 1996
started in 1996 when a woman did the right thing and was
when a woman did the right thing and was ignored. And Annie Farmer, Maria's
ignored. And Annie Farmer, Maria's sister, called it weaponized
sister, called it weaponized incompetence, which is exactly what it
incompetence, which is exactly what it is. The system didn't fail to catch
is. The system didn't fail to catch Jeffrey. It just chose not to for 30
Jeffrey. It just chose not to for 30 years cuz they needed to, I don't know,
years cuz they needed to, I don't know, get their ducks in a row and make sure
get their ducks in a row and make sure all of them weren't seen as the
all of them weren't seen as the predators that they are. But why did
predators that they are. But why did Aosta kill the indictment? And why did
Aosta kill the indictment? And why did the FBI sit on Farmer's tip for 10
the FBI sit on Farmer's tip for 10 years? And why are three co-conspirators
years? And why are three co-conspirators still unnamed? And why are 3 million
still unnamed? And why are 3 million pages withheld? And why has no one knew
pages withheld? And why has no one knew been charged? And why did the DOJ
been charged? And why did the DOJ publish victims nude photos while
publish victims nude photos while protecting their identities? I don't
protecting their identities? I don't have the answers, but I know who does.
have the answers, but I know who does. And they're not talking. They're
And they're not talking. They're actively ignoring and brushing it off.
actively ignoring and brushing it off. But I started this video by telling you
But I started this video by telling you what Todd Blanch said on February 1st.
what Todd Blanch said on February 1st. >> In July, the Department of Justice said
>> In July, the Department of Justice said that we had reviewed the files, the
that we had reviewed the files, the quote epste files, and there was nothing
quote epste files, and there was nothing in there that allowed us to prosecute
in there that allowed us to prosecute anybody. And that's what that's what's
anybody. And that's what that's what's important for for the American people.
important for for the American people. And the victims want to be made whole.
And the victims want to be made whole. And and so we we want that. The attorney
And and so we we want that. The attorney general wants that more than anything.
general wants that more than anything. But but that doesn't mean we can just
But but that doesn't mean we can just create evidence or that we can just kind
create evidence or that we can just kind of um come up with a case that doesn't
of um come up with a case that doesn't that that isn't there.
that that isn't there. >> I've looked, you've looked or you've
>> I've looked, you've looked or you've heard what at least a tiny percent of it
heard what at least a tiny percent of it is. So did they get it wrong? And I
is. So did they get it wrong? And I think the polls, the fake polls, I'm
think the polls, the fake polls, I'm going to guess the fake polls answer it.
going to guess the fake polls answer it. Don't even go in their favor. And I'm
Don't even go in their favor. And I'm pretty sure they control those. So
pretty sure they control those. So that's pretty bad. I think and the
that's pretty bad. I think and the transparency act passed 427
transparency act passed 427 to1. So this is not a left and right
to1. So this is not a left and right issue. It is across every demographic.
issue. It is across every demographic. So let's make that very clear. There's
So let's make that very clear. There's no sides to this. They are all evil.
no sides to this. They are all evil. All of them. Everyone's complicit in my
All of them. Everyone's complicit in my opinion. You know, it's not even my
opinion. You know, it's not even my opinion. I mean, you got the Clintons,
opinion. I mean, you got the Clintons, you have the Obama's administration, you
you have the Obama's administration, you have Trump, you have it's just it's like
have Trump, you have it's just it's like you can't even you can't look anywhere
you can't even you can't look anywhere and somebody's connected to somebody and
and somebody's connected to somebody and nobody said anything. The system is
nobody said anything. The system is protecting the powerful at the expense
protecting the powerful at the expense of the people they harmed. So, this is
of the people they harmed. So, this is not a system that failed. That is a
not a system that failed. That is a system that worked exactly as designed
system that worked exactly as designed because the system doesn't prosecute the
because the system doesn't prosecute the powerful. prosecutes the expendable and
powerful. prosecutes the expendable and calls it justice and just looks at us
calls it justice and just looks at us and expects us to be okay with that.
and expects us to be okay with that. We're not monsters like you. We actually
We're not monsters like you. We actually want something to be done. But I want to
want something to be done. But I want to end with something from Epstein's prison
end with something from Epstein's prison psychiatric evaluation, and it's in the
psychiatric evaluation, and it's in the files, saying, quote, "His identity
files, saying, quote, "His identity appeared to be based on his wealth,
appeared to be based on his wealth, power, and association with other
power, and association with other high-profile individuals."
high-profile individuals." And that's not just Epstein. That's the
And that's not just Epstein. That's the system that protected him. And a world
system that protected him. And a world where wealth is insulation, where
where wealth is insulation, where knowing the right people means the law
knowing the right people means the law doesn't not apply to you. Even when the
doesn't not apply to you. Even when the FBI has a 60count indictment with your
FBI has a 60count indictment with your name on it and three and a half million
name on it and three and a half million pages and nobody goes to jail. And
pages and nobody goes to jail. And whether that's enough is up to you. It's
whether that's enough is up to you. It's up to you because they're not doing
up to you because they're not doing anything about it. And I like many many
anything about it. And I like many many many other people are calling them out.
many other people are calling them out. So do something.
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
