YouTube Transcript:
Secret History #27: Empire of Evil

Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.

Video Transcript

Video Summary

Summary

Core Theme

This content argues that the alliance between transnational capital (represented by the British Empire) and the Sabbatean Frankists was instrumental in shaping modern societal ideologies, including Marxism, Darwinism, liberalism, and Freudian psychology, by creating chaos and manipulating philosophical and political landscapes for profit and power.

Mind Map

Click to expand

Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate

We've discussed transnational capital,

the British Empire. We've also discussed

the Sabatine Frankets. Today we will put

the two ideas together

and show how the alliance between these

two different forces have created

modernity or the ideas

that underpin our society today

including Marxism, Darwinism,

individualism, liberalism and Freudian psychology.

psychology.

All right. So, we will talk a lot about

Jews today, but just as a caveat, it's

important for us to remember that it's

easy to see a Jewish conspiracy everywhere.

everywhere.

But things are actually much more

complicated than that. The argument I

want to make you to you today is that

the Jews are construct and tool of

empire. In other words, they're really

the middle managers. to the ones who

helped manage the empire. And if the

Jews weren't around, then it would be

the Indians or some other group. An

empire needs scapegoats. It needs middle

managers. And for the past few years,

the Jews have served the purpose.

Something else I will show you today is

that the empire, which is transnational

capital, they all the profit. They hide

behind the scenes. They're the shadows

and they make all the money. And it's

really the Jews get all the blame. And

what we'll discuss next class is that

this is the same thing that will happen

today. Okay. So that's the argument I

will make to you today. All right. So

let's discuss the British Empire. The

British Empire is unique in human

history in that it controls the entire

world. Um and it's just a small island,

right? It's a small island with very

little resources and it's able to

control the entire world because it

controls global trade. It has the

world's greatest navy. It also it also

has a bank of England which is really

transnational capital

and English becomes the uh lingua frana

of the world and has colonies throughout

the world as well. So for the British

Empire the way they control the world

it's a very simple concept. As long as

the British Empire is able to control

the seaways,

then it controls the world. The great

crisis, the great problem, great threat

is that a empire will emerge within the

Eurasian continent. It's called the

heartland. Okay? And this could be

Germany, it could be Russia, it could be

China. But if it's able to emerge

eventually like the mong like the Mongol

Empire, it's able to conquer the entire

Eurasian continent and through railways

it's able to link up Africa, the Middle

East, Europe and Asia all together into

one trading block and then you don't

need the seaways anymore. If that were

to happen then the British Empire would

go bankrupt because remember the British

Empire with the Bank of England

transational capital it's really a Ponzi

scheme. It be it needs people to keep on

buying into the empire for it to

continue to succeed. So the greatest

threat is a great power emerging the

heartland and throughout history that

was either the French, the Ottoman

Empire, the Germans or the Russians. So

the grand strategy of the British is to

create as much chaos and conflict

in Europe as much as possible. You

always want your enemies fight each

other. Okay. And that's just the core

strategy of the British. Not very hard. Okay.

Um so again as we discussed there are

four major enemies that the British have

faced throughout their uh uh history as

an empire. The French they able to

defeat because of the French Revolution

as well as the Nepolic wars. Uh then

they had to face the Russians and the

Russians were the greatest threat

because the Russians had the largest

land empire and they were the most

likely to unify the Asian continent. uh

they also face the Ottomans and they

also face the Germans. Now the British

could not um

seem as though they were interfering in

European politics because that all that

would do is anger the Europeans and

youite the Europeans against the

British. They had to do it using sub

foods secretly using intelligence

operatives, right? And so of course what

happened was that

um they develop different strategies in

order to divide and conquer Europe. Uh

what they would do is promote

revolutionary movements

um using transnational capital and we'll

discuss these revolution movements later

on. They also industrialize Japan

because they saw Japan as a natural ally

in u in the world. Okay. So you know

that in Japan they underwent the Maji

restoration and in only a few decades

they were able to industrialize so much

so that they defeated Russia in the

RussoJapanese war in 1905

and you may not know this but capital

the British and Americans finance a

great deal of Japan's industrialization

because Anglo-American Empire wanted

Japan as an ally. Okay, it was a natural

ally. Um what they would also do is

establish resource colonies. So

Australia, New Zealand, Canada, these

South Africa, these are all resource

colonies. The idea is that you can now

use manpower to fund your armies. Okay.

And uh the last strategy is to wherever

you can steal as much resources as

possible as fast as you can. And this

was true in India and China and Africa

as well. Okay. So this is the grand

strategy of the British. and they needed

agents to help them in these endeavors.

And the 17 Frankas made the most sense,

right? Um so the advantages that 17 fra

empire were four-fold. The first is that

they already had a diaspora, right? And

so and they were also um crypto Jews.

They also disguise identity as Jews as

well. So they were able as a network to

conduct intelligence, do blackmail and

subvert governments. Okay. They also had

access to a lot of transnational

capital. They themselves were extremely

wealthy. The last uh major advantage and

the most important is that they had

revolutionary cells and networks. Okay.

So remember Frankus they believe that

they were saving the world. They

believed they had to destroy the world

in order to save it. And these made

perfect revolutionaries. And I'll show

you this as we move on. Okay. Now, the

last reason that we won't discuss much

today, but we'll focus a lot on in our

last class is the idea of esquetology

where the rich empire they are um

Christians and they believe that they

must use Jews as as a pawn in order to

force the return of Jesus. This we'll

discuss a great deal next class, but I

want I want to focus on these three

reasons first. Okay. All right.

Um, so and it made sense for the British

to align themselves with the 17 Frankus

because the way they saw the world was

the same. Okay. As an empire, as

transnational capital, remember, you're

focused on extracting as much energy as

possible from your workers. So, you're

very materialistic. Well, the Franks

were also very materialistic as well,

right? They believe that the body was

more important than the spirit. Second

is that the both the Frankus and the

British they wanted to obtain power

through chaos, instability and regime

change and both were very focused on the

pursuit of wealth and power. So these

were natural allies. Sorry.

Sorry.

All right. So let's use an example of

how the Art Empire sorry. Let's use an

example of how the British Empire worked

this afternoon. And the most obvious

example is the Ottoman Empire. So for

the longest time the Ottoman Empire was

the most powerful force in in Eurasia.

And this was the Ottoman Empire at its

height in 1683. Remember 1666 is when

somebody Zevi declared himself the

Messiah. And remember that Zeb Zevi have

to convert to Islam and the people who

follow him into Islam are called the

Dome. Okay, the Dome are very important people.

Um, but over time empires will decay. In

1853, Russia attacked the Art Oman

Empire and this led to the Crimean War.

The British and the French feared

Russian expansionism and so they support

the Ottomans and uh the Ottomans were

able to defend themselves against the

Russians. But this alliance came at a

cost to the Ottomans. The British and

the French made the Ottomans seek out

loans in order to finance the war. And

over time because of interest they loan

these loans start to overwhelm the

Ottoman financial system. And so what

happened was the British and the French

bankers came and established their own

tax administration. And so from now on,

a third of all revenue, tax revenue that

the Ottoman Empire generated would go

directly to the French and British

bankers. Okay? And so this caused the

Ottoman Empire to decline rapidly over time.

time.

And uh the French and the British, they

set a central bank controlled by

foreigners. And not only that, but they

set their own tax administration.

So they they had their own tax agents

and that's why these bankers became very

wealthy. Guess what? These bankers had a

natural ally in a domain, right? The

Sabine Frankus.

Um, and so these Sabine Franks also

became very wealthy. Now, what happened

is that the Ottoman Sultan didn't really

like this relationship. He didn't like

being bossed around by these bankers.

And so, he went to the Germans. And so,

now the Germans were now financing

Ottoman Empire. And they were now

allies. And so, the British and the

French didn't like this. And so what the

do was start to finance a revolutionary

group called the young Turks. The young

Turks believed in three things. They

believed in secularism, no religion.

They believed in liberalism and they

believed in individualism. Okay, just

basically basic ideas of modernity.

And eventually the young Turks were able

to overwhelm the Ottoman Empire and

establish something called the Republic

of Turkey which is still around today.

So guys, the the we talk with Turkey. If

you go to Turkey, it's a do that control

Turkey. Okay.

All right. Um, so remember the do come

from Zabai Zevi.

They are cryptojews. They pretend to be

Muslim, but they're in fact Jews.

And these three do uh will help to found

the Republic of Turkey. And they still

control Turkey. Together. Okay, so

that's an example of an alliance between

the 17 something fraus and the British

Empire. Another example of an alliance

is of course the Rothschild banking

dynasty. This is Jacob Rothschild with

King Charles of England. And this

alliance goes back hundreds of years.

And um the Rothschild family

um is of course one of the most powerful

banking families in the world. So

there's a story of how they got rich. In

um 1815

Napoleon and the British fought the

battle of Waterloo and this would

determine who controlled Europe.

the in the battle, the British and the

Germans together were able to defeat the French.

French.

When this news happened,

an agent of the Rothschild got into a

Corvette, which is a fast boat, and they

sailed all the way back to London to

tell the Rothschild the news. The

Rothschild controlled the media at that

point. And so the the media told

everyone, "Oh my god, we lost the battle

of Wateroo." So, as you can imagine,

people start to panic. There was a stock

market crash. and then the Rothschild

bought up all the assets. That's how

they became extremely wealthy. And this

is a strategy that they continue to use

throughout their history. Okay. So, um

where the 17 Frank is and where the

British Empire clamped the most was in

philosophy, developing a understanding

the world that allowed them to amass

more power. Okay. So, let's go over

quickly over some basic British

philosophy. So British philosophy at

this time was controlled by Freemasons.

We'll discuss the Freemasons more next

class. Okay. But the main purpose was to

really deny God and truth and there were

three major strands of this philosophy.

Okay. The first major strand is what

called empirism and the most famous

proponent of this is John Lock. John

argue that we are born with a tablo rasa

a blank mind okay a blank slate and so

whatever information comes into us is

through experience only through

experience okay not through reasoning

not not because of god not because of

imagination or inspiration not because

of divine spark in us but through just

experience and only experience okay

David Hume proposed a new idea called

skepticism and he goes even further than

John lock John lock says that We

experience the world and that's how we

know the world.

Now the entire basis of science is the

idea called induction. If I see a white

swan a thousand times, I can then infer

that all swans are white. Okay, this

idea of induction, this is what

underlies process. Well, the idea of

induction, you can never access truth.

And what David Hume says is induction

does not work. You cannot prove that

just because you've never seen a black

swan, black swans don't exist.

Okay? You could have seen 10 million

white swans does not prove that all

swans are white and can only be white.

And he's right because there are black

swans. Okay? So what what he's saying is

the very project of truth seeeking, the

very project of epistemmonology of

philosophy, it's all nonsense. Not only

that, but we don't really know things.

All we do is remember things.

Okay? So when we say that Rome is a

capital of Italy, we think we know it,

but we don't we don't know it. It's all

just convention. It's all just we agree

to call a place in Italy Rome. We agree

that that's a capital. Okay, it's all

disagreement. But there's no basis for

truth here.

All right. So now this this raises the

problem of okay, if God doesn't exist,

if truth doesn't exist, if there's no

way for us to reach truth, if there's if

there's no way for us to discover truth,

then what can we do? And so uh Jerry

Bentham proposed the idea of

utilitarianism. The way we understand

the world is just through utility. If it

is good for the majority of people, then

it must be good. If it causes pleasure

for the majority of people, then that

policy must be good. If people want to

eat candy all the time and makes them

feel happy, then we should allow them to

eat candy and that is inherently good.

Okay? And then what his disciple

John Su Mill will do is he'll take the

basis of this idea of utility as a as a

basis of good and evil to create

liberalism. Okay. So the very idea of

liberalism today is based on

utilitarianism. So for example

homosexuality. Why is homosexually

homosexuality good? Because first of all

homosexuals want to be homosexuals.

Okay? You force them not to be

homosexuals they'll feel bad. But also

what's more important is they're not

doing any harm to anyone, right? So if

you just do the mathematics and you

recognize that allowing homosexuality is

a is a positive and that positive and

brings more pleasure to the world, then

you should allow it. Okay? And this

religious talk of it goes against the

will of God, it's against the Bible,

it's just it's just nonsense. We should

just focus on first principles

and just focus on utility. Does it bring

benefit to people? And this is the very

basis of

um British British British philosophy.

And as you can as you can appreciate

this align very much with the 17 Frank's

All right. So this is John Mill and this

is Jeremy Banam. Okay. And not only

that, but once this philosophy is in

place, they are now going to promote

certain scientists

that um

um agree with this philosophy or or

whose findings support this philosophy.

And the most famous of course is Charles Darin.

Darin.

Okay, Charles Darwin, right? When his

book origin species came out, it was an

instant bestseller. And within 20 years,

it became the mainstream understanding

of how we originated. Even though you

actually read the book, even though you

actually look at science, it's still

very problematic. All right. So, this is

very strange how science is supposed to

be a field of rigorous debate, rigorous

science, right? But but the but the

evidence supporting evolution is limited

and again we discuss this all the time

but it doesn't explain to us how we come

to think right it explains to us how we

got our bodies sure yeah from apes we

get humans that makes sense but

intellectually we're a lot more

imaginative than apes how to explain

that and he doesn't explain that okay

and you're not even allowed to ask this question

all All right. So,

um, as this alliance between the seven

Franks and the British Empire is

growing, there are certain individuals

that become

um these meeting points of these two

different groups. Okay. So, so let's

discuss two of them. The first is

Benjamin Deseli. And he's important

because he becomes the first and only

Jewish prime minister of the British

Empire. Okay. My second person is Leon

the Rothschild who is here to the

Rothschild begging family. They're best

friends and you can argue the Rothschild

begging family finance uh Benjamin

Draeli's uh banking career. Okay. And um

in 1844

Benjamin Desi will publish a book called

Conan Conins. It's a novel. Okay. It's

not a memoir but it's a novel. But if

you read it, people will say that the

characters are very much based on people

that this Israeli knows. And this really

is very explicit

in telling us why he wrote the book. And

the idea is to tell the British people

more about Jews because Jews right now

in history in Britain, they're an exotic

species. And it's also to establish how

Jews think. Now, what's amazing about

this um novel is that you read it and

it's really strange, but it conforms to

every single anti-semitic stereotype

that we say today. Today, you say that

Jews rule the world. You say that Jews

work together, they conspire together,

you say that Jews think that they're

superior to everyone else, you are

labeled as an anti-semit. Okay? But if

you read this novel and we'll read this

down together, this is exactly what bed

Israeli says, okay, about the Jewish

people. All right, so uh let's let's

read it together. Okay, so Emmer, can

you can you read please? This is the

introduction to

uh the book Connor speak. Okay,

>> in asserting the paramount character of the

the >> eistle

keep going. Okay.

Uh polity and the ma majesty of the

theocratic principle. It became

necessary to ascend to the origin of the

Christian church and to meet in a spirit

worthy of a critical and comparatively

enlightened age. The position of the

descendants of that race who were the

founders of Christianity. The modern

Jews had long labored under the odium

and stigma of medieval meal.

meal.

What we're saying is this um

Christianity is a great religion but

it's important that we look at the origins

origins

of Christianity and who found

Christianity okay which is a Jews we

know we know it's a Jews who create

Christianity okay keep on going

>> in the dark ages when history was

unknown the passions of societies

undisturbed by tra tradition

traditionary experience were strong and

their convictions um mitigated by

criticism were necessarily fanatical

So during the dark ages, everyone was

just stupid. Okay, keep on going.

>> The Jews were looked upon in the Middle

Ages as an a cursed race, the enemies of

God and man, the special foes of

Christianity. No one in those days

paused to reflect that Christianity was

founded by the Jews, that its divine

author in his human capacity was a

descendant of King David.

>> Wait, divine author of course is Jesus. Okay.

Okay.

>> That his doctrines a vowedly were the completion

completion

not the change of Judaism. That the

apostles and the evangelists who names

men daily invoked and whose volumes they

embraced with reverence were all Jews.

That the infallible throne of Rome

itself was established by a Jew. And

that a Jew was the founder of the

Christian churches of Asia. So this

really is not just saying that Jews are

important, but he's also saying that

Jews are superior because they're the

ones who created Christianity. And what

what he will say later on is Jews

created everything because Jews are the

most intellectually creative people in

the world. Okay. And remember, this

really is a Jew and he's one of the

Jewish elite. Okay. All right. Let's

keep on going. All right. So in the

novel, the major character is Adidonia,

who is a wealthy Jewish person based on

the Rothschild family. Okay. And he's

going to explain to us how Jews control

the world. All right. Can you read Alan?

>> Yeah. Okay. >> Sedonia.

>> Sedonia.

>> Sedonia was descended from a very Asian

and noble family of arrogant.

>> Okay. Aragon is in Spain. Okay. So we

discussed how before 100 years the Jews

were part of uh the Spanish Muslim

Empire but when they were reconquered

they were forced to leave or convert

going that in the course of ages had had

given to the state many distinguished

citizens in the priesthood its member

had been precar precoliately eminent

besides several prelades they counted

among their numbers and ar

Arkbishop of Toato and Sidonia in a

season of great danger and different

diff different difficulty difficulty had

exercised for a series of years the

paramount office of grand inquisitor.

Okay. So even after the Christians

reconquered Spain and after some Jews

converted to Catholism. Okay. First of

all these Jews kept their faith secret.

So even though on the outside they were

Catholics, in the inside they were still

Jews. Okay, they were crypto Jews. But

much more importantly, these Jews rose

to supreme power within the Catholic

Church in

Spain. The irony is that the Spanish the

Spanish Inquisition where Catholics were

looking for Jews who were pretending to

be Christians, the leadership were Jews.

The leadership were crypto Jews. Okay,

this is this is what this really saying.

I'm not saying this is true, but this is

what this really is saying. Okay, uh

keep on going. Yet strange at it may

sound, it is nevertheless a fact of

which there is no lack of evidence that

these ill illustrious family during all

these period in common with twoird of the

the

uh aren arang

uh nobility secretly adhered to the

Asian faith and ceremonies of their

fathers. I believe in the unity of the

god of senior seni and the rights and

observances of the laws of Moses.

>> Okay. So guys, 23 of nobility in Spain

were crypto Jews. Catholics disgu uh

Jews disguised as Catholics. Okay. All

right. So again, I'm not saying this is

true, but it's striking and really

strange that a Jewish man who's very

powerful will become prime minister of

England. He's writing this stuff. Okay.

He's putting the mouth in the put in the

mouth of basically a rash child.

Okay. Uh can you read Amber?

>> The Sedonius of Aragon were

>> new Christians

>> were nuvo Christianos Christristenos.

Some of them no doubt were burned alive

at the end of the 15th century under the

system of to Quimada. Many of them

doubtless were the San Bonito, but they

kept their titles and estates and in

time reached those great office uh

offices to which we have referred.

During the long disorders of the

peninsula war when so many openings were

offered to talent and so many

opportunities seized by the adventurous

ait of younger branch of this family

made a large fortune by military

contracts and supplying the comat

commisserate of the different armies at

the peace precient of the great

financial future of Europe.

confident in the fertility of his own

gen genius in his original views of

fiscal subjects and his knowledge of

national resources. Then Sedonia feeling

that Madrid Madrid or even Katis could

never be a base on which the monetary

transactions of the world could be

regulated resolved to immigrate to

England with with which he had in the

course of years formed considerable

commercial connections. He arrived here

after the peace of Paris with his large

capital. He staked all he was worth on

the waterl loan and the event made him

one of the greatest capitalists in Europe.

Europe.

>> Okay. So these crypto Jews they had a

lot of money but not only that but they

have a lot they have an information

network okay because they have relatives

friends all throughout Europe and there

are index to superior and so they know

how history will develop and they see a

great money making opportunity in war.

So when these wars come out, what these

Jews do is they support both sides. So

they have possibly lose and then they

make a lot of money and then they figure

out where it is in their most advantage

to be. So they have actually no national

loyalty. Don't see themselves as

belonging to a certain group of people,

a certain nation. They see themselves as

first and foremost Jews. Okay? So when

the time presented itself properly,

these Sedonians they will migrate, some

of them, not all of them will migrate

from Spain into continental Europe and

up to England because they saw England

as a future. And of course from England

they will also migrate to the United

States of America. Okay.

Um Alan, can you read please?

>> The only human quality.

>> Sorry. So the the the father goes to

England and now he establishes the

banking dynasty and his son will now

inherit everything. Okay. And and so and

so this is about the sun. Keep on going.

>> Yeah. The only human quality that

interested Sidon Sidonia was in

intellect her he cared not whence it

came where it was to be found. Creed

country class character in this respect

were alike indifferent to him.

>> Okay. So again this is a very

anti-semitic trope where Jews don't like

the idea of nation or culture or

religion. They like the idea of ideas.

Okay. And one anti-semitic trope is that

Jews have a conspiracy to degrade religion

religion

uh culture society nation state in order

to advance their own interests. Okay.

The author, the artist, the man of

science never appealed to him in vain.

Often he anticipate their wrongs and

wishes. He encouraged their society was

as frank in his conversation as he was

generous in his contributions. But the

instant they ceased to be authors,

artists or philosophers, and their

communications arose from anything but

the intellectual quality which had

originally interest him. The moment they

were rash enough to approach intim in

intimacy and appeal to the sympathizing

men instead of the congenial

intelligence, he saw them no more. Okay,

so this is a really important idea where

again this is propaganda for Jews,

right? So this really is saying how

great Jews are. Jews are intellectual.

But you know what Hegel, Frederick Hegel

will say is that without culture there

can be no great ideas.

Okay, ideas emerge from community, from

culture, from belonging. Okay, so think

of uh Homer or Dante or even the Yahweh.

Okay, if you if you think that you are

intellectual above culture, above

nation, above people, you will not

produce great ideas. Okay, keep on

going. It was not however intellect

merily in these unquestionable shapes

that commanded his notice. There was not

an adventurer in Europe with whom he was

not familiar. No minister of state has

such communication which secret agents

and political spies as Sidonia. He held

relations with all the clever outcasts

of the world. The cat catalog of his

acquaintance in the shape of Greeks am

Marinians Moors secret Jews tartans

geese geese seeds.

>> Okay. All right. That's fine. Okay.

Look, the idea is that Jews are intern

first and foremost international the cosmopolitan

cosmopolitan

right and as a result what will happen

is that over time because he is in

contact with so many different groups

he's so intellectual he's always reading

his his history he comes convinced that

the superior race the greatest race of

humanity are the Jews why because unlike

other races the Jews refuse refuse to

intermar. They refuse to breed with

other cultures. And so as so as a

result, the Jews are first and foremost

peer. They are Aryan. Okay, this is

really ironic again because the Nazis

will use this idea 100 years later to

justify the Holocaust. But at this time

in history, uh the Jews think that they

are the superior race because they are

the most pure. Okay. So So this is all

that is saying.

All right. Can you read Amber?

>> In this country, says Adidonius.

>> So this country of course is England, right?

right?

>> Since the peace there has been an

attempt to advocate a reconstruction of

society on a purely rational basis. The

principle of utility has been powerfully

developed. I speak not with lightness of

the labors of the dis disciples of that

school. I bow to intellect in every form

and we should be grateful to any school

of philosophers even if we disagree with

them. Doubtly grateful in this country

were for so long a period of our state

statesmen were in so pit pitiable

and a career of public intelligence.

There has been attempt to reconstruct

society on a basis of material motives

and calculations.

>> Okay. So again this is the idea of

utitarianism right? This is Jimmy

Bentham, John Suit Mill. Keep on going.

>> It has failed. It must ultimately have

failed under any circumstances. Its

failure in an ancient and densely people

kingdom was inevitable. How limited is

human reason, the profoundest inquir

inquirers are most conscious. We are not

indebted to the reason of man for any of

the great achievements which are the

landmarks of human action and human

progress. It was not reason to be

besieged to Troy. It was not reason that

sent forth the sarin

from the desert to conquer the world.

>> Okay. So the Serakans are the Muslims. Okay.

Okay.

>> That inspired the crusades um that

instituted the monastic orders. It was

not reason that produced the Jesuit

Jesuits. Above above all, it was not

reason that created the French

Revolution. Men is only truly great when

he acts from the passion. Never

irresistible, but when he appe when he

appeals to the imagination. Even Mormons

counts more votaries than >> Benam.

>> Benam.

And you think then that an imagination

once subdued the state. Imagination may

now save it. Man is made to adore and to

obey. But if you will not command him,

if you give him nothing to worship, he

will fashion his own divinities and find a

chieftain in his own passions.

>> So um Sono is is emphasizing the

limitations of British philosophy,

right? Law, hume, banan, they're all

limited. And so what the British need is

for the Jews with their imagination,

with their religion to save the British,

to lead the British, to guide the

British. Okay? Does that make sense?

So again, this is trying to establish

Jewish supremacy. Okay? All right. This

is much too long. Okay? But what he's

really saying is

like, listen, we Jews, we want to be

part of society. We are naturally

conservative but we also want to

practice our religion. So if you at any

point if you the British at any point

try to restrain us, if you try to take

away our religious rights, we will rebel

against you. We are cohesive. We we will

stand up for liberalism. We will stand

up for secularism. We will stand up for

individualism because these three

philosophies are what most protect us

from religious overreach. Okay? Does

that make sense? Okay. So that's that

that's what he's saying. So Alan, can

you start here? You never observe. >> Yeah.

>> Yeah.

>> You never observe a great intellectual

movement in Europe in which the Jews do

not greatly participate. The first

Jesuits were Jews.

>> This is true. Okay guys, the secret

intelligence agency of the Catholic

Church were first Jews. This is true.

Keep on going.

That mysterious

Russian diplomacy which so alarmed

Western Europe is organized and

principally carried on by Jews.

>> So the Jews are the agents of the

Russian Empire. Right. The mighty

revolution which is at th this moment

preparing in Germany and which will be

in fact a second and greater

reformations and of which so little is

at yet know in England is entirely

developing under the an uh >> opaces

>> opaces

>> opaces of Jews who almost monopolize the

professional profession professorial

chairs of Germany.

>> Okay. So this doesn't happen yet. Okay.

He's saying this year 1844 he's saying

like the revolution you will see later

on in Germany we organized it man we

Jews organized it why because we control

themies we control the professorships of

Germany you want keep on reading

>> ner the founder of spiritual christ Christianity

Christianity

who and who is re regious professor of

divinity in the university of Berlin as

a Jew

>> okay so keep on going okay we won't read

it about how many professors are Jews

okay do you understand now what's

amazing is again this came out 1844 and 1848

1848

there were revolutions throughout Europe

throughout Germany. So how did the

Israeli know about this? Well, possibly

because the British were helping to

finance all this right from the alliance

between the British and the Frankus.

All right. Uh can you read Amber?

>> Okay. From

>> from from here. Okay.

>> A few years back we were applied to by

Russia. Now there has been no friendship

between the court of St. Petersburg and

my family. It has Dutch connections

which have generally supplied it and our

representations in favor of the Polish

Hebrews a numerous race but the most

suffering and degraded of all the tribes

have not been very agreeable to the

Cesar the SAR. Okay. So what he's saying

is we're very rich and nation states

come and look for us for money. Okay. So

Russia wants a loan from us. We said,

"No, you mistreat the the Jews, so we're

not going to give you any money." Okay.

The Russians are notorious for being

anti-semitic at this stage. Okay, keep

on going.

>> However, circumstances drew to an

approximation between the Romanoffs.

>> The Romanovs are the controlling family

of Russia

>> and the Sidonians. I resolved to go

myself to St. Petersburg. I had on my

arrival an interview with the Russian

minister of finance court >> count.

I beheld the son of a lethusian Jew. The

loan was connected with the affairs of

Spain. I resolved on repairing repairing

to Spain from Russia. I traveled without

intermission. I had an audience

immediately on my arrival with the Spain

minister Senor Mendes Sabul. I beheld

one like myself, the son of a Novo

Cristiano, a Jew of Aragon. In

consequence of what transpired at

Madrid, I went straight to Paris to

consult the president of the French

Council. I beheld the son of a French

Jew, a hero, an imperial marshall, and

and very appropriately so. For who

should be military heroes, if not those

who worship the Lord of hosts? And is

salute a Hebrew? Yes. And others of the

French marshals. And the most famous,

Masenna, for example, his real name was Manisa.

Manessa. But to my anecdote, the

consequence of our consult consultations

was that some northern powers should be

applied to in a friendly and mediative

capacity. We fixed on Prusia and

>> Prussia and the president of council

made an application to the Prussia

Prussian minister who attended a few

days after a conference. Count Arnim

entered the cabinet and I beheld a

Prussian Jew. So you see my dear

>> Connor speak Connor speak

>> Connor speak that the world is governed

by very different personage from what is

imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

scenes.

>> So it's Jews who control the world

because only Jews get along together.

Okay. So if Jews didn't exist, the world

couldn't get along, right? And Jews hide

everywhere. And that's how the world

works, guys. You think the person in

charge is in charge, but actually it's a

secret society of of Jews. Now, again,

I'm not saying this is true. I just

found it really weird that Benjamin

Israeli is writing about this, okay? And

again, he's getting a lot of this

information from the Rothschild banking

family. So, the Rothschild, for whatever

reason, think they control the world.

Okay? So I don't go much into this in

detail, but I will point out that there

is evidence that this is true. All

right, so we're going to look at the

communist revolution in Russia together.

I also want to keep you in mind that I

don't think this is true. Actually,

there's evidence is true, but I do not

think this is true. Why this really is

writing about this, we will discuss next

class, okay? But it's all part of a

secret plan.

All right, but first let's look at the

evidence that this may be true. Again,

I'm not saying this is true, but there

is evidence that this is true. Okay? And

the main major piece of evidence is the

communist revolution, the bullsh

revolution 1917 that overthrew the uh

government of Russia to create a

communist government. All right, first

let's talk about revolution. There are

four elements you need in order for a

revolution to be successful. Okay, the

first is you need a really charismatic

leader. Second is you need a broad mass

appeal usually land for the peasants

freeing debt okay and end of war peace

then you need organizational discipline

everyone has to get along okay has to be

a cohesive group the last element of

course is you need incompetent

opposition your enemies a okay and

maong versus Changai. Okay. Minon was a

charismatic leader who had a very strong

organization and checked even though he

had a huge army even though he had the

American army. Even though he had all

sorts of benefits, he was a Okay.

And that's why he lost.

All right. So the same is true for the

Russian Revolution. This is Valer Lenin.

He's not charismatic, but he is

extremely focused. He's fanatical. And

And

um this is Leonki who is very

charismatic. He's a very he's a great

speaker and he's a Jew. Okay. So I will

point out that in 1917 he helped lead

the revolution. But before that he was

actually the United States.

He had an apartment in New York City

paid for by wealthy Jewish bankers. His

uncle is a very wealthy Jewish

industrialist in Ukraine. Okay. So, he's

part of this transnational capital

network and even though he himself is a

revolutionary, he hates capitalism. If

someone gives you money, you cannot help

but be influenced by that person. Okay?

That's just a reality.

All right? So um October 1917 is when

the bullshiks uh launched a revolution

and they seized power and then a month

later they organized um an election and

as you can see they are actually not

that they are not the most popular party

in Russia. Um they only have about 23%

of the votes. The socialist

revolutionaries actually have much more

popularity than they do. They have 37%.

And then you have all these different

groups. the Ukrainians, the cadets who

are liberals, dimensions,

um the Kosaks. So at this point in

history, Russia is divided into so many

different groups. You have different

ethnicities, you have different

political programs, you have um

different orientations. Okay? And this

is what will launch the great civil war.

Okay? And at this time in history,

remember the bullshiks only control a

certain part of Russia. They are the

official government, but they only

control a small part. and the white army

who are the which combination of the

liberals and monarchists they have much

more stronger military and also at the

same time you have all these different

ethnic groups the Ukrainians rebelling

against the boss including the Polish

but over the next 5 years slowly the

bull blevik will obtain absolute power

and so the question is how do they do

that well the first tool is

terror. Okay, this this is called the

red terror where they went around and

killed anyone who opposed them. Now,

what you don't understand is there's

actually a strategy behind the red

terror. The the very idea is to steal as

much money as possible from wealthy

people. Okay? So, you're an aristocrat.

You have a lot of wealth hidden. I need

your money. So you either give me your

money or I will kill your daughter and I

will kill your son and I will then I

will kill your wife. Okay? So it's your

choice. Give me all your money or I'll

kill everyone in your family. So the

Bullshiks were fanatical about this and

that's why they won the war. Leon Trosky

organized the red army in um the war

against the white army. Okay. They also

the greens which were these peasants. So

there's a lot so the Bushiks were far

behind. So, how did the Bullshiks, the

Red Army, win the war? Well,

guys, they had a lot of help. Okay, they

had a lot of mercenaries coming to the

country, tens of thousands of

mercenaries to help them, especially uh

the Chinese mercenaries, the Latvians,

the Hungrians. Okay, why? How did they

get all this money? Transnational

capital. Wall Street and City of London

were bankrolling the Soviets. Why were

they doing that?

Also we have to remember that at this

time in history during the revolution

Britain and France, United States, Japan

sent armies into

Russia. Now what you learn in class is

oh it's because they are capitalists and

they fear the communists and that's why

they sent armies to try to uh uh reduce

the threat. That's not true

guys. Why is it the armies is because

the Bolsheviks

reigned on debt. Okay, Russia owed a lot

of money to Britain, Japan, United

States and France. And so these armies

were sent in order to threaten the

Bviks. So what the Bik Bixs did was they

stole as much money as they could from

the peasants, from nobility, from the

treasury and pay off these armies. And

then these armies helped them in the war

against the uh the whites. Okay. Does

All right. So, let's summarize what what

we've just learned. Now, what you're

taught in history class is American

Britain needs Russia in war against

Germany. And that's why and the Germans

control the Bolshviks. And that's why

Britain and uh America would not support

the bullshiks. And the counter argument

is no, it's transnational capital that

has influence over Anglo-American

foreign policy. Okay, do you understand?

Anglo-American foreign policy. It's not

to serve national interests. It's not

it's to serve private capital. Okay,

that's the first point. Second point is

the Bviks are communists and so they're

a threat to capitalism. And the kind

argument is actually transnational

capital cares about profit. They don't

care about ideology. All right. What

drives them is money not ideas. The

third argument is the most hated

imperialism and capitalism. So they

would refuse to work with Wall Street

and the city of London. And the kind of

argument of is that they believe that

the ends justify the means. We just have

to like do what we need in order to

obtain power. Then we can create our

socialist paradise. Okay. All right. All

right. So, uh, this is a book called

Wall Street and the Russian Revolution.

A story by Rich by the name of Richard

Spence. He spent a lot of time

collecting documents that show that in

fact transational capital were helping

the bullshiks

win power in Russia. Why? Because they

believed in the bullshiks? No. Because

transial capital first and foremost

steals. You understand? They like

revolution because revolution is

opportunity to steal as much as you can.

Okay. You can buy things really cheaply

during a revolution. And this this is

his argument. All right. So, let's read

a couple passages from his book. So, uh

Emma, can you read please?

>> The pro bosic fashion faction on Wall

Street had a most outspoken pitchmen in the

the

>> aforementioned William Boyce Thompson.

Departing Petrograde, he arrived back in

the states on Christmas Day in 1917. On

18th January, he sat for an interview

with a representative of Do Jones and

published in the Wall Street Journal.

>> Wall Street Journal of course is the

newspaper of the of Wall Street. boy.

>> Despite the fact that Bolshvix uh had

proclaimed an army army on the Eastern

front and open peace negotiations with

Berlin, Thompson insisted that the

Russians would never conclude a separate peace.

peace.

>> Okay, so he's just lying to people.

Okay, the Bikes want peace with Germany.

They promise peace to the people. That's

why they're popular. And these Wall

Street bankers are just lying to

American people. Okay, keep on going. He

pooed pooed reports that there was

anarchy in Russia and said that the

Russian people were trying to adopt

socialism as the basis of their

government. If they were allowed to

succeed, an extremely democratic,

well-managed country will emerge. In

other words, an excellent business environment.

environment.

>> So, what the basically did was they took

all the gold they had to bribe Wall

Street so that Wall Street would go and

brainwash American people. Okay. That's

that's the strategy here.

>> All right. Um, can you read, Alan? Yeah,

>> for those on Wall Street and elsewhere

who dreamed of putting the brakes on

Russia's economic development and seeing

its reaches and resources up for grabs

under the regime willing to sell

anything that dreams had basically come true.

true.

>> Okay, so it's really important to

understand the British Empire was

fighting a war against Germany. Russia

was an important ally, right? They

didn't care because for Britain they

want to destroy everyone. Okay. So

that's why they support the Russian

revolution because they know they knew

the boss would destroy the Russian economy.

economy.

So keep on going.

>> Yeah. From 1918 through early 1921, Bri

war commun communism reduced Russian to

an econ economic based on barter and

robbery. Besides the abolition of

private trade and the destruction of the

monetary system, the rare regime

embarked on a massive looting campaign, reanking

reanking

rents palaces, bank vaults, churches,

and museums. They expropriate every

volume valuable they could get their

hands on and stash it all in a new state

treasury. By the close of 1921, an

estimate $450 million dollars in

valuable had been sequestered

u sequested sequested there with more to

come. Much of it does not disting to be

fenced abroad for a fraction of its

value in capital capitalist hard currency.

currency.

>> So this is how empire works guys, okay?

They destroy nations in order to steal

as much as they can. What happens

afterwards? They don't care.

All right. It's that simple. All right.

Okay. So, after the Bolsheviks

consolidate power, after the win civil

war, everyone assumes that Trosky would

be the new leader. But it's Stalin that

becomes the new leader. Okay. Why?

Because after the war ends, there's

expectation among the bullshiks. know we

help the transational capital so much

they're going to help us rebuild our

nation. Okay, they're going to give us

loans. They will give us technology to

help us rebuild Russia. And guess what

happened? National Capital says, "No,

you guys are good. We're good. We we

made our money." Okay? And so now what's

happening is that Leontrosky, who is a

Jew, he gets blamed, right? Because

Leontrosky is the one who brought in

transational capital. He's the one who

facilitated this exchange. And now the

is thinking, "Oh, this is

Jewish conspiracy. You Jews were

planning this all along to steal

everything from us and then screw us

over in the end." Okay, that's why

Stalin won. All right, so let's go over

the difference between Leon Trosky and

Joseph Stalin. Leon Trosky did not work

for transnational capital. Okay, he was

first and foremost a revolutionary who

was interested in global revolution. He

had a he had a mess calling to transform

and save the world. Um but he was

accused of being transational capital

and because he was a Jew that just

assumed that he was a spy. Okay. And um

he also had a personality which was

arrogant and aloof. Stalin had his own

issues. Okay. But he benefited from the

fact that Trosky was a Jew and he was

able to slowly amass power for himself.

He also has a background as a police

informant but um but being a spy for the

capitalist was a much worse crime. All

right. And that's why Joseph Stalin uh

won in the end and this is terrible for

the Jews the BI Jews who believed in the

revolution because they all got killed

by Joseph Stalin. Okay. Leoni was killed

along with his with all his children.

All right. So it's not just that

transational capital supported the

bullshiks, they also supported Carl

Marx. Okay. All right. So Karl Marx has

an interesting background. He actually

comes from a uh many generations of

rabbis. So he's basically a Jewish

aristocrat and he was German, but then

he moved to England and he wrote many

letters, wrote many books to promote

communism. These books aren't going to

sell well. So he was poor all his life.

But what's interesting is he lived a

very nice life. Okay, he he lived in

England and he lived a basic middle

class life. So where did he get all his

money from? Well, he got he got all his

money from Frederick Engles who was a

friend of his and whose father was an

industrialist. Okay, a Jewish

industrialist. So why would a Jewish

capitalist support Carl Marx? And the

answer is because communism benefits

transnational capital. Okay. So um why

why would it benefit transational

capital? All right. Uh can can you read

Amber? So this is a letter written by

Carl Marx. Okay.

>> For as soon as the distribution of labor

comes into being each man has a

particular exclusive sphere of activity

which is forced upon him and from which

he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a

fisherman, a herdsman or crit a critical

critic and must remain so if he does not

want to lose his means of livelihood.

While in communist society where nobody

has one exclusive sphere of activity but

each can become accomplished in any

branch he wishes, society regulates the

general production and thus makes it

possible for me to do one thing today

and another tomorrow to hunt in the

morning, fish in the afternoon, rare

cattle in the evening, criticize after

dinner and uh and as I have a mind

without ever becoming hunter, fisherman,

horsemen or critic. Okay. So the problem

with capitalism is that it degrades our individuality.

individuality.

We as individuals want freedom to enjoy

ourselves. Right? This is a very frankus

idea, right? We want to enjoy ourselves.

We want to be free to enjoy the

pleasures of life. The problem of

capitalism is the idea of specialization,

specialization,

right? Where you're forced to do one

thing, one thing only according to the

needs of the capitalist. Okay. Uh can

you keep on reading, Amber? Okay.

>> Supposing that we had produced in a

human manner in his production each of

us would have doubtly affirmed himself

and his fellow men. I would have

objectified in my production my

individuality and its peculiarity and

would thus have enjoyed in my activity

and individual expression of my life and

would have also had in looking at the

object the individual pleasure of

realizing that my personality was

subjective, visible to the senses and

therefore a power raised beyond all doubt.

doubt.

>> Okay. So what what he's saying here is

that before each of us were crafts

people. So I might make a vase. Okay.

And when I make a vase then this vase is

a expression of my individuality

expression of my creativity. And by

looking at this vase it becomes an objective

objective

symbol of my existence. I can look at

this vase and my own individual individ

individuality will be reflected back to

at me. Okay, keep on going.

>> In your enjoyment or use of my product,

I would have had the direct enjoyment of

realizing that by my work I had both

satisfied a human need and also

objectified the human essence and

therefore fashioned for another human

being the object that met his need.

>> Then I give you this vase to a friend

and I see this vase at the friend's

home, right? He puts flowers

and he's very happy with this vase and

then I I can see my impact in the world.

All right. Uh, keep on reading. Amber,

>> I would have been for you the mediator

between you and the species and thus

between and thus been felt by you and

acknowledged as a completion of your own

essence and a necessary part of yourself

and I would thereby have realized that I

was confirmed both in your thought and

in your love.

>> Okay. So this vase now shapes your

reality and I know that this vase has

given you meaning and it has shaped your

reality and therefore I find meaning in

that. Okay. Again this is a very

Frankish attitude right where you can

project your imagination onto people and

it can shape the way he or she sees

reality. Okay. This is a very similar

concept. Do you want

>> in my expression of my life I would have

fashioned your expression of your life

and thus in my own activity I have

realized my own essence my human communal essence

communal essence >> okay right so again this is something

>> okay right so again this is something that sounds perfectly correct right and

that sounds perfectly correct right and the reason why it sounds correct to us

the reason why it sounds correct to us is because it becomes a basis for our

is because it becomes a basis for our society

society okay the idea of individ individualism

okay the idea of individ individualism the idea of materialism

the idea of materialism okay keep on going

okay keep on going >> in such a situation our products would

>> in such a situation our products would be like so many mirrors. Each one

be like so many mirrors. Each one reflecting on our essence thus in this

reflecting on our essence thus in this relationship what occurred on my side

relationship what occurred on my side would also occur on yours.

would also occur on yours. >> Okay, so this is a really important

>> Okay, so this is a really important metaphor. Okay, he's saying that objects

metaphor. Okay, he's saying that objects become mirrors where we can see our own

become mirrors where we can see our own individuality reflected. Okay, and this

individuality reflected. Okay, and this goes against the religious concept where

goes against the religious concept where our humanity is all reflected in each of

our humanity is all reflected in each of us. Okay. So, so what he's doing is

us. Okay. So, so what he's doing is creating a material outlook. Does that

creating a material outlook. Does that make sense? He's denying the existence

make sense? He's denying the existence of God. He's he's denying the existence

of God. He's he's denying the existence of spirituality, but he's taking the

of spirituality, but he's taking the concept of religion and applying to a

concept of religion and applying to a material world, right? He recognizes

material world, right? He recognizes that we have these spiritual religious

that we have these spiritual religious needs. And what he's saying is that we

needs. And what he's saying is that we don't need God to achieve these needs.

don't need God to achieve these needs. We can we can have materialism achieve

We can we can have materialism achieve these needs. Okay? Which again is a very

these needs. Okay? Which again is a very Frankish concept. Keep on going. My work

Frankish concept. Keep on going. My work would be a free expression of my life

would be a free expression of my life and therefore a free enjoyment of my

and therefore a free enjoyment of my life. In work, the peculiarity of my

life. In work, the peculiarity of my individuality would have been affirmed

individuality would have been affirmed since it is my individual life. Work

since it is my individual life. Work would thus be genuine active property

would thus be genuine active property presupposing private property and my my

presupposing private property and my my individuality is so far externalized

individuality is so far externalized that I hate my activity. It is a torment

that I hate my activity. It is a torment to me and only the appearance of an

to me and only the appearance of an activity and thus also merely a force

activity and thus also merely a force activity that is laid upon me through an

activity that is laid upon me through an external arbitrary need not an inner and

external arbitrary need not an inner and necessary one.

necessary one. >> Right? So why would transnational

>> Right? So why would transnational capital support this idea? The reason

capital support this idea? The reason why is that before the debate was mind

why is that before the debate was mind versus matter, right? What what matters

versus matter, right? What what matters more the spirit or the flesh? And what

more the spirit or the flesh? And what Marx is saying is no what matters what

Marx is saying is no what matters what the debate the dialectic is between

the debate the dialectic is between private property versus public property

private property versus public property in private property I have to work for

in private property I have to work for someone else in public property I work

someone else in public property I work for myself that's the question that's

for myself that's the question that's the debate that's the dialectic okay and

the debate that's the dialectic okay and so what by doing this it's a very clever

so what by doing this it's a very clever trick that trans capital uses by making

trick that trans capital uses by making us think that the only thing that

us think that the only thing that matters is private versus public as

matters is private versus public as opposed to mind versus matter. Okay,

opposed to mind versus matter. Okay, that's the goal of communism. That's why

that's the goal of communism. That's why trans capitalist support idea because it

trans capitalist support idea because it advances the goal of empire which is

advances the goal of empire which is turn us all into slaves. Okay, does that

turn us all into slaves. Okay, does that make sense? All right.

make sense? All right. All right. So Markx is correct in

All right. So Markx is correct in analyzing the problems of capitalism.

analyzing the problems of capitalism. Okay.

Okay. But his problem is that he believes the

But his problem is that he believes the solution is to make capital public

solution is to make capital public and as a result this will create a

and as a result this will create a workers's paradise.

workers's paradise. But there are problems with this. Okay.

But there are problems with this. Okay. So let's go over some of the problems.

So let's go over some of the problems. Okay. Markx believes that history is

Okay. Markx believes that history is linear progress. So capitalism will lead

linear progress. So capitalism will lead to socialism which will lead to

to socialism which will lead to communism. It is a linear progress.

communism. It is a linear progress. Okay. Second is a problem that history

Okay. Second is a problem that history is theological, meaning things go the

is theological, meaning things go the way they should. Markx also believes

way they should. Markx also believes that what matters is class struggle

that what matters is class struggle between the rich and the poor as opposed

between the rich and the poor as opposed to uh between spirit and flesh. Okay.

to uh between spirit and flesh. Okay. Now, the last thing that's that's most

Now, the last thing that's that's most problematic is Marx believes you need a

problematic is Marx believes you need a vanguard in order to lead the politarian

vanguard in order to lead the politarian into a socialist paradise. you need an

into a socialist paradise. you need an elite in order to

elite in order to um lead us into paradise. And this

um lead us into paradise. And this estology is all Frankish, right? This is

estology is all Frankish, right? This is something that we learned last class.

something that we learned last class. This is something that Frank proposed

This is something that Frank proposed where um his group is a new people which

where um his group is a new people which will lead people into a material

will lead people into a material paradise. Right? So all Marx is doing is

paradise. Right? So all Marx is doing is taking Jacob Frank's ideas and

taking Jacob Frank's ideas and systemizing it. Now I'm not saying that

systemizing it. Now I'm not saying that Marx was a Frankus. He's probably not a

Marx was a Frankus. He's probably not a Frankus.

Frankus. But what I'm saying is that there are

But what I'm saying is that there are people around him like Frederick Engles

people around him like Frederick Engles who could have been a Frankus and as

who could have been a Frankus and as such and they used their money to

such and they used their money to influence Marx in a way. Okay. And we kn

influence Marx in a way. Okay. And we kn and I we can suspect this because

and I we can suspect this because there's some ideas that don't make

there's some ideas that don't make sense. If you are a socialist, you

sense. If you are a socialist, you believe in democracy. But Marx believed

believe in democracy. But Marx believed in a dictatorship.

in a dictatorship. Okay, that makes no sense. All right.

Okay, that makes no sense. All right. So,

So, um this is Muel Buchanan and he was a

um this is Muel Buchanan and he was a socialist. He was an anarchist. And he

socialist. He was an anarchist. And he believes

believes uh he agrees with most of Mark's

uh he agrees with most of Mark's analysis, but where they disagree is

analysis, but where they disagree is this.

this. Markx believed you need a vanguard.

Markx believed you need a vanguard. Okay? Like critical Frank believed. But

Okay? Like critical Frank believed. But Bennon says, "No, no, no. If you're a

Bennon says, "No, no, no. If you're a vanguard, they'll just become a new

vanguard, they'll just become a new capitalist class. Okay? What's the

capitalist class. Okay? What's the difference, man? If you are a socialist,

difference, man? If you are a socialist, you have to believe in democracy.

you have to believe in democracy. You have to believe that everyone has

You have to believe that everyone has capacity to make his or her decisions.

capacity to make his or her decisions. And that has that must be the basis of

And that has that must be the basis of your new society. Otherwise, we're just

your new society. Otherwise, we're just going to go back to the way things are

going to go back to the way things are before. Okay? It'll just it'll just be

before. Okay? It'll just it'll just be another empire. Before it's a British

another empire. Before it's a British Empire, now it's a Russian Empire. Who

Empire, now it's a Russian Empire. Who cares? What's the difference? All right.

cares? What's the difference? All right. So, let let's read some. Okay. All

So, let let's read some. Okay. All right. Can you read Amber?

right. Can you read Amber? >> As for us, we want neither phantoms nor

>> As for us, we want neither phantoms nor nothingness, but living human reality.

nothingness, but living human reality. And we recognize that man can feel free,

And we recognize that man can feel free, be free, and therefore can achieve

be free, and therefore can achieve freedom. In order to be free, I need to

freedom. In order to be free, I need to see myself surrounded by free men, and

see myself surrounded by free men, and be recognized as such by them. I am free

be recognized as such by them. I am free only when my individuality reflected in

only when my individuality reflected in the mirror of the equally free

the mirror of the equally free consciousness of every individual around

consciousness of every individual around me comes back to me strengthened by

me comes back to me strengthened by everyone's recognition.

everyone's recognition. >> Okay,

>> Okay, >> so this is really important. Okay, this

>> so this is really important. Okay, this may seem the same as Marks, but really

may seem the same as Marks, but really they're saying different things. Mark

they're saying different things. Mark says no, the object is a reflection. And

says no, the object is a reflection. And what we kind of say, no, no, no, the

what we kind of say, no, no, no, the other person is a reflection. Okay. And

other person is a reflection. Okay. And this goes back to Dante Zorusra Jesus

this goes back to Dante Zorusra Jesus the divine spark in us and we love

the divine spark in us and we love someone else. When we care about someone

someone else. When we care about someone else, our divine spark is reflected in

else, our divine spark is reflected in that person's divine spark as well.

that person's divine spark as well. Okay. And the object gets in the way.

Okay. And the object gets in the way. That is a crucial distinction. Do you

That is a crucial distinction. Do you understand? Okay. It sounds the same,

understand? Okay. It sounds the same, but these are two radically opposing

but these are two radically opposing ideas where Mark says, "No, it's the

ideas where Mark says, "No, it's the object that matters. As long as the

object that matters. As long as the object is created by yourself freely

object is created by yourself freely then that is good. And what we kind of

then that is good. And what we kind of says no no what matters is our

says no no what matters is our relationship with each other. Okay we

relationship with each other. Okay we don't need the object. Okay.

don't need the object. Okay. >> The freedom of every other individual

>> The freedom of every other individual does not limit my own as the

does not limit my own as the individualists claim. On the contrary,

individualists claim. On the contrary, it is the confirmation, realization and

it is the confirmation, realization and human dignity of all persons to see and

human dignity of all persons to see and feel my freedom confirmed, sanctioned

feel my freedom confirmed, sanctioned and boundlessly expanded by universal

and boundlessly expanded by universal agreement is happiness. It is human

agreement is happiness. It is human paradise on earth.

paradise on earth. >> How you create paradise is through love.

>> How you create paradise is through love. Okay, you understand? Not through

Okay, you understand? Not through objects, not through public property,

objects, not through public property, not through socialism, but through love.

not through socialism, but through love. Okay, the problem with Markx is he focus

Okay, the problem with Markx is he focus on the individual. what makes the

on the individual. what makes the individual happy and what kind of says

individual happy and what kind of says is that's stupid. You have to focus on

is that's stupid. You have to focus on what makes a community happy because

what makes a community happy because it's only through food happiness of

it's only through food happiness of others can we ourselves be happy. Okay,

others can we ourselves be happy. Okay, this is something that Jesus said

this is something that Jesus said Zorusta Dante. Okay, this is what makes

Zorusta Dante. Okay, this is what makes logical sense and Mars is not a dumb

logical sense and Mars is not a dumb guy. Okay, he's a really smart person

guy. Okay, he's a really smart person but he says something opposite which

but he says something opposite which suggests to us that he is being

suggests to us that he is being influenced by an outside force. Okay. He

influenced by an outside force. Okay. He himself would not come to the conclusion

himself would not come to the conclusion that

that he himself would not come to the

he himself would not come to the conclusion that you need a vanguard to

conclusion that you need a vanguard to lead the uh the workers.

lead the uh the workers. All right. Can you keep on reading?

All right. Can you keep on reading? Amber

Amber >> available to everyone will be a general

>> available to everyone will be a general scientific education especially the

scientific education especially the learning of the scientific method, the

learning of the scientific method, the habit of correct thinking, the ability

habit of correct thinking, the ability to generalize from facts and make more

to generalize from facts and make more or less correct deductions. But of

or less correct deductions. But of encyclopedic minds and advanced so

encyclopedic minds and advanced so sociologists there will be very few. It

sociologists there will be very few. It would be sad for mankind if at any time

would be sad for mankind if at any time theoretical speculation became the only

theoretical speculation became the only source of guidance for society. If

source of guidance for society. If science alone were in charge of all

science alone were in charge of all social administration. Life would wither

social administration. Life would wither and human society would turn into a

and human society would turn into a voiceless and surv. The domination of

voiceless and surv. The domination of life by science can have no other result

life by science can have no other result than the brutalization of mankind. Okay.

than the brutalization of mankind. Okay. So what he's saying is this the ultimate

So what he's saying is this the ultimate project of Marxism when you have

project of Marxism when you have something elite a vanguard in charge

something elite a vanguard in charge when this is no different by the way

when this is no different by the way from trans national capital or the

from trans national capital or the British Empire okay it would lead to

British Empire okay it would lead to slavery

slavery all right and quite honestly he was

all right and quite honestly he was right

right all right let's look at Simon Freud okay

all right let's look at Simon Freud okay Sigman Freud like Marx is also extremely

Sigman Freud like Marx is also extremely influential

influential um He practiced medicine in Vienna. He

um He practiced medicine in Vienna. He was a psychologist. And so there were a

was a psychologist. And so there were a lot of young women who came to him as

lot of young women who came to him as patients. And for would ask them,

patients. And for would ask them, "What's wrong with you?" And the woman

"What's wrong with you?" And the woman would say, "I'm hysterical." Okay? And

would say, "I'm hysterical." Okay? And at that time, hysterical just meant that

at that time, hysterical just meant that um depressed or anxious. I can't control

um depressed or anxious. I can't control my emotions. If a man talks to me, I

my emotions. If a man talks to me, I like I I I stutter and I I I run away.

like I I I stutter and I I I run away. Okay? And I can't have personal

Okay? And I can't have personal relationships. I can't sleep. I'm

relationships. I can't sleep. I'm sweating. I'm anxious. And then for of

sweating. I'm anxious. And then for of course would ask him would ask them why

course would ask him would ask them why is this happening to you to you? Okay.

is this happening to you to you? Okay. And then the woman would say because

And then the woman would say because when I was younger when I was a little

when I was younger when I was a little girl my father raped me. Okay. Incest.

girl my father raped me. Okay. Incest. That's why this happened to me. And then

That's why this happened to me. And then Freud's like, "Wow, this sounds really

Freud's like, "Wow, this sounds really strange." But then he looked at at the

strange." But then he looked at at the literature. He talked to many patients

literature. He talked to many patients and he recognized that everyone was

and he recognized that everyone was telling him the same thing. And it's

telling him the same thing. And it's true. I mean it's just pure um logic

true. I mean it's just pure um logic right if you are abused as a young girl

right if you are abused as a young girl by your father you have a lot of social

by your father you have a lot of social problems when you get older okay

problems when you get older okay especially with men and so he he

especially with men and so he he collects all this research and he

collects all this research and he published a paper which is very good

published a paper which is very good called the ideology of hysteria and so

called the ideology of hysteria and so uh Emma can you can you read please

uh Emma can you can you read please >> above all my previously communicated

>> above all my previously communicated assumption that trauma specifically

assumption that trauma specifically sexual trauma cannot be stressed of as a

sexual trauma cannot be stressed of as a path a p pathogenic agent was confirmed

path a p pathogenic agent was confirmed a new even children of respected

a new even children of respected high-minded puritanical families fall

high-minded puritanical families fall victim to real rape much more frequently

victim to real rape much more frequently than other had dared to suspect

than other had dared to suspect >> okay so this is what he's saying is this

>> okay so this is what he's saying is this rape is a really common phenomenon

rape is a really common phenomenon especially among higher society okay

especially among higher society okay keep on going

keep on going >> either their parents themselves seek

>> either their parents themselves seek substitution for their lack of sexual

substitution for their lack of sexual satisfaction in this pathological manner

satisfaction in this pathological manner or else trusted persons such as

or else trusted persons such as relatives, uncles, aunts, grandparents,

relatives, uncles, aunts, grandparents, tutors, servants, abuse, ignorance and

tutors, servants, abuse, ignorance and innocence of children. The obvious

innocence of children. The obvious objection that we are dealing with

objection that we are dealing with sexual fantasies of the of the child

sexual fantasies of the of the child himself that is with historical lies

himself that is with historical lies unfortunately is weakened by the

unfortunately is weakened by the multitude of confessions of this kind on

multitude of confessions of this kind on the part of patients in analysis to

the part of patients in analysis to assaults on children.

assaults on children. >> Okay. So what he's saying is first of

>> Okay. So what he's saying is first of all rape is very common and these

all rape is very common and these children are saying the same thing.

children are saying the same thing. Okay, keep on going.

Okay, keep on going. >> If you try in a uh an approximately

>> If you try in a uh an approximately similar way to induce the symptoms of

similar way to induce the symptoms of hysteria to make themselves heard as

hysteria to make themselves heard as witnesses to the history of the origin

witnesses to the history of the origin of the illness, we must take our start

of the illness, we must take our start from Joseph Brewer's momentous

from Joseph Brewer's momentous discovery. The symptoms of hysteria

discovery. The symptoms of hysteria apart from the stigmata are determined

apart from the stigmata are determined by certain experiences of the patients

by certain experiences of the patients which have operated in a traumatic

which have operated in a traumatic fashion and which are being rep

fashion and which are being rep reproduced in his uh psych psychical

reproduced in his uh psych psychical psychical life in the form of mimic

psychical life in the form of mimic symbols.

symbols. >> Okay. So this is the ideas are simple.

>> Okay. So this is the ideas are simple. Okay. These women when they're being

Okay. These women when they're being historical, when they're being anxious,

historical, when they're being anxious, depressed, it's because they suffered

depressed, it's because they suffered real trauma when they were younger,

real trauma when they were younger, they're not making this up, okay?

they're not making this up, okay? They're not imagining this because a lot

They're not imagining this because a lot of people are accusing them like you're

of people are accusing them like you're just fantasizing this. Okay? And they

just fantasizing this. Okay? And they say, "No, no, no. The science tells us,

say, "No, no, no. The science tells us, the research tells us you can only have

the research tells us you can only have these symptoms if you yourself

these symptoms if you yourself experience it." Okay? You cannot imagine

experience it." Okay? You cannot imagine a leg injury. It has you have to be hit

a leg injury. It has you have to be hit by a car to have a leg injury. And and

by a car to have a leg injury. And and this is what he's saying. You have to be

this is what he's saying. You have to be raped by your father or a trusted friend

raped by your father or a trusted friend or a relative in order to have these

or a relative in order to have these symptoms. Otherwise, they can't exist.

symptoms. Otherwise, they can't exist. Okay. All right. Keep on going.

Okay. All right. Keep on going. All right. So, this is a book by Jeffrey

All right. So, this is a book by Jeffrey Mason. Okay. And and he was for the

Mason. Okay. And and he was for the longest time an um follower of Freud.

longest time an um follower of Freud. Okay.

Okay. um Freud was dead but he himself looked

um Freud was dead but he himself looked at Freud's personal letters and what he

at Freud's personal letters and what he discovered was there's a sharp break

discovered was there's a sharp break okay and early Freud was very scientific

okay and early Freud was very scientific he believed the woman uh who are his

he believed the woman uh who are his patients but then later on for a reason

patients but then later on for a reason he changes everything okay so so so can

he changes everything okay so so so can can you keep on reading Amber

can you keep on reading Amber >> I therefore put forward the thesis that

>> I therefore put forward the thesis that at the bottom of every case wisteria

at the bottom of every case wisteria there are one or more occurrences of

there are one or more occurrences of premature sexual experience occurrences

premature sexual experience occurrences which belong to the earliest years of

which belong to the earliest years of childhood but which can be reproduced

childhood but which can be reproduced through the work of psychoanalysis in

through the work of psychoanalysis in spite of the intervening decades

spite of the intervening decades >> okay so again he's writing these letters

>> okay so again he's writing these letters to his friends and he's saying very

to his friends and he's saying very clearly I am certain 100% certain that

clearly I am certain 100% certain that if these women are suffering from

if these women are suffering from depression or anxiety it must be because

depression or anxiety it must be because of sexual abuse at an earlier age and

of sexual abuse at an earlier age and when I talk to them I can reconstruct

when I talk to them I can reconstruct the experience. Okay? Because even

the experience. Okay? Because even though they're traumatized, the memory

though they're traumatized, the memory is still there. So through talk therapy,

is still there. So through talk therapy, I can slowly reconstruct the experience

I can slowly reconstruct the experience and this will help them heal. Okay? And

and this will help them heal. Okay? And this is true. If the if the women are

this is true. If the if the women are able to reconstruct this experience and

able to reconstruct this experience and they feel as though someone believes

they feel as though someone believes them, advocates for them, they will feel

them, advocates for them, they will feel much more safe about the world. Okay? So

much more safe about the world. Okay? So this is true. This is very simple. Okay?

this is true. This is very simple. Okay? Keep on going. There are however a whole

Keep on going. There are however a whole number of other things that vouch for

number of other things that vouch for the reality of infantile sexual scenes.

the reality of infantile sexual scenes. In the first place there is the

In the first place there is the uniformity which they exhibit in certain

uniformity which they exhibit in certain details which is a necessary consequence

details which is a necessary consequence if the preconditions of these

if the preconditions of these experiences are always of the same kind

experiences are always of the same kind but which would otherwise lead us to

but which would otherwise lead us to believe that there were secret

believe that there were secret understandings between the various

understandings between the various patients.

patients. >> Okay. So, what he's saying is, is it

>> Okay. So, what he's saying is, is it possible there's conspiracy among these

possible there's conspiracy among these patients?

patients? Um, possibly. But they're telling me

Um, possibly. But they're telling me they're giving me like these details and

they're giving me like these details and these details make a lot of sense. Okay?

these details make a lot of sense. Okay? So, he doesn't believe it's a

So, he doesn't believe it's a conspiracy, but he does not discount the

conspiracy, but he does not discount the possibility of a conspiracy because he's

possibility of a conspiracy because he's a scientist. He wants to be rigorous. He

a scientist. He wants to be rigorous. He wants to be um absolutely certain. Okay?

wants to be um absolutely certain. Okay? Keep on going. In the second place,

Keep on going. In the second place, patients sometimes describe as harmless

patients sometimes describe as harmless events whose significance they obviously

events whose significance they obviously do not understand since they would be

do not understand since they would be bound otherwise to be horrified by them

bound otherwise to be horrified by them or again they mention details without

or again they mention details without laying any stress on them which only

laying any stress on them which only someone of experience in life can

someone of experience in life can understand and appreciate as subtle

understand and appreciate as subtle traits of reality.

traits of reality. >> Okay. So he he says that one thing about

>> Okay. So he he says that one thing about this trauma is this disassociation.

this trauma is this disassociation. Okay. So these patients will reveal

Okay. So these patients will reveal details that would shock anyone else but

details that would shock anyone else but she says it indifferently which means

she says it indifferently which means that she was disassociated from the

that she was disassociated from the experience when it happened. So just by

experience when it happened. So just by telling that person you're able to

telling that person you're able to reconstruct the experience itself.

reconstruct the experience itself. Right? Does that make sense? All right.

Right? Does that make sense? All right. Okay.

Okay. It is less easy to refute the idea that

It is less easy to refute the idea that the doctor forces a reminiscence of this

the doctor forces a reminiscence of this word on the patient that he influences

word on the patient that he influences him by suggestion to imagine and

him by suggestion to imagine and reproduce them. Nevertheless, it appears

reproduce them. Nevertheless, it appears to me equally untenable. I have never

to me equally untenable. I have never yet succeeded in forcing on a patient a

yet succeeded in forcing on a patient a scene I was expecting to find in such a

scene I was expecting to find in such a way that he seemed to be living through

way that he seemed to be living through it with all the appropriate feelings.

it with all the appropriate feelings. Perhaps other may be more successful in

Perhaps other may be more successful in this. So one major objection is is it

this. So one major objection is is it possible you are you are implanting

possible you are you are implanting false memories in your patient and what

false memories in your patient and what he's saying is okay well I've tried this

he's saying is okay well I've tried this and it doesn't work and maybe others and

and it doesn't work and maybe others and he he doesn't deny that it's possible

he he doesn't deny that it's possible okay but he's saying like I myself have

okay but he's saying like I myself have tried this and it has not worked so he's

tried this and it has not worked so he's being a very rigorous scientist right

being a very rigorous scientist right he's looking at all different

he's looking at all different possibilities and he's discovering that

possibilities and he's discovering that no um there's only one possibility which

no um there's only one possibility which is like they are telling the truth. So

is like they are telling the truth. So he's advocating for his patients. Okay.

he's advocating for his patients. Okay. The problem though of course is that the

The problem though of course is that the fathers who are doing this are extremely

fathers who are doing this are extremely powerful men. These are Frank. Okay.

powerful men. These are Frank. Okay. Remember Frankus practice

Remember Frankus practice um

uh father daughter incest. Okay. Understand? Okay. that Franks are very

Understand? Okay. that Franks are very powerful people especially in Vienna

powerful people especially in Vienna and this is part of their religion. If

and this is part of their religion. If you do it over generations, it just

you do it over generations, it just becomes multigenerational trauma. You

becomes multigenerational trauma. You just do it because it's you're addicted

just do it because it's you're addicted to it. Okay. And this is screwing up a

to it. Okay. And this is screwing up a lot of these young women. It's making

lot of these young women. It's making them miserable. Uh yeah.

them miserable. Uh yeah. Uh so you mentioned that this kind of

Uh so you mentioned that this kind of rape is frequently occurred in upper

rape is frequently occurred in upper class. Why does it not so frequently in

class. Why does it not so frequently in the lower class?

the lower class? >> Um, you know what? That's a good

>> Um, you know what? That's a good question. Okay. And the answer is,

question. Okay. And the answer is, um, if you are an upper class woman,

um, if you are an upper class woman, you're much more likely to report this

you're much more likely to report this than if you are from the lower class.

than if you are from the lower class. So, I'm not we're not saying that this

So, I'm not we're not saying that this occurs only among the rich. It could

occurs only among the rich. It could also occur among the poor. But it's the

also occur among the poor. But it's the rich who have money to send their

rich who have money to send their daughters to psych psych to

daughters to psych psych to psychiatrists. Okay? The rich are

psychiatrists. Okay? The rich are educated and therefore they will report

educated and therefore they will report this. They understand this is a bad

this. They understand this is a bad thing. Okay. So we don't have evidence

thing. Okay. So we don't have evidence to suggest that this is more common

to suggest that this is more common among rich. Okay. But what this is

among rich. Okay. But what this is telling us is that among Frank is this

telling us is that among Frank is this is very common.

is very common. All right.

All right. All right. So after this happens after

All right. So after this happens after Freud is reporting this and the Frankus

Freud is reporting this and the Frankus are getting angry at him. What happens

are getting angry at him. What happens now is an alliance between Freud and the

now is an alliance between Freud and the Frankus. In fact, you could argue that

Frankus. In fact, you could argue that Freud now joins a fractus. And so now

Freud now joins a fractus. And so now what we'll see is a radical change

what we'll see is a radical change in how Freud perceives these patients.

in how Freud perceives these patients. Okay. So, Emma, can you read please?

Okay. So, Emma, can you read please? >> Since childhood masturbation is such a

>> Since childhood masturbation is such a general occurrence and is at the same

general occurrence and is at the same time so poorly remembered, it must have

time so poorly remembered, it must have an equivalent in psychic life. And in

an equivalent in psychic life. And in fact, it is found in the fantasy

fact, it is found in the fantasy encountered in most female patients.

encountered in most female patients. >> Okay. namely that

>> Okay. namely that >> namely that the father seduced her in

>> namely that the father seduced her in childhood. This is the later reworking

childhood. This is the later reworking which is designed to cover up the

which is designed to cover up the recollection of infantile sexual

recollection of infantile sexual activity and represents an excuse and an

activity and represents an excuse and an extinuation thereof. The grain of truth

extinuation thereof. The grain of truth contained in this fantasy lies in the

contained in this fantasy lies in the fact that the father by way of his

fact that the father by way of his innocent car caress in earliest

innocent car caress in earliest childhood has actually

childhood has actually awakened the little girl's sexuality.

awakened the little girl's sexuality. The same thing applies to the little boy

The same thing applies to the little boy and his mother. It is these same

and his mother. It is these same affectionate fathers that are the ones

affectionate fathers that are the ones who then endeavored to break the child

who then endeavored to break the child of the habit of masturbation of which

of the habit of masturbation of which they themselves had by the that time

they themselves had by the that time become the unwitting cause and thus the

become the unwitting cause and thus the motives mingle in the most successful

motives mingle in the most successful fashion to form this fantasy which often

fashion to form this fantasy which often dominates a woman's entire life.

dominates a woman's entire life. seduction fantasy. One part truth, one

seduction fantasy. One part truth, one part gratification of love, and one part

part gratification of love, and one part revenge.

revenge. >> Okay, so now this is like really weird.

>> Okay, so now this is like really weird. Okay, what what he's saying is these

Okay, what what he's saying is these young girls, these young boys, they want

young girls, these young boys, they want to have sex. They they're they're like

to have sex. They they're they're like sexually obsessed. And whenever a father

sexually obsessed. And whenever a father kisses them, which the father wants to

kisses them, which the father wants to do, they think this is this is going to

do, they think this is this is going to lead to sex. But the father recoils at

lead to sex. But the father recoils at that possibility. And now the young girl

that possibility. And now the young girl feels rejected. But she has all these

feels rejected. But she has all these sexual desires. So she masturbates, but

sexual desires. So she masturbates, but while she's masturbating, she feels

while she's masturbating, she feels anger and guilt at her father.

anger and guilt at her father. Therefore, she makes up these sexual

Therefore, she makes up these sexual fantasies that the father is raping him.

fantasies that the father is raping him. And that's why and she's determined that

And that's why and she's determined that the world know this. That's that's how

the world know this. That's that's how angry he she is at him. Okay, this is

angry he she is at him. Okay, this is complete nonsense. But guess what guys?

complete nonsense. But guess what guys? This becomes standard mainstream

This becomes standard mainstream academic knowledge taught in schools and

academic knowledge taught in schools and universities for many decades. Okay,

universities for many decades. Okay, this is called the edifo complex. That's

this is called the edifo complex. That's that's a complex. Have you guys studied

that's a complex. Have you guys studied this?

this? >> Yeah.

>> Yeah. >> It's complete utter nonsense.

>> It's complete utter nonsense. >> Agree.

>> Agree. >> Right.

>> Right. Can you keep on reading, Amber? The

Can you keep on reading, Amber? The motives.

motives. >> The motives for illness often begin to

>> The motives for illness often begin to stir in childhood. The love hungry

stir in childhood. The love hungry little girl unhappy at having to share

little girl unhappy at having to share her parents' affection with her brothers

her parents' affection with her brothers and sisters, realizes that all that

and sisters, realizes that all that tenderness comes flowing back when her

tenderness comes flowing back when her parents are made anxious by her illness.

parents are made anxious by her illness. The girl now knows a way of calling

The girl now knows a way of calling forth her parents' love and will use

forth her parents' love and will use this as soon as as she has at her

this as soon as as she has at her disposal the psychical psychical

disposal the psychical psychical material necessary to produce a morbid

material necessary to produce a morbid state. Once the child has become a woman

state. Once the child has become a woman and in contradiction of the demands of

and in contradiction of the demands of the childhood has married an inattentive

the childhood has married an inattentive man who suppresses her will unst uh

man who suppresses her will unst uh unstintingly exploits her work and

unstintingly exploits her work and expends neither affection nor money upon

expends neither affection nor money upon her. Illness becomes the only weapon

her. Illness becomes the only weapon with which she can assert herself in

with which she can assert herself in life. It gives her the it gives her the

life. It gives her the it gives her the rest she craves. It force it forces the

rest she craves. It force it forces the man to make uh to make sacrifices of

man to make uh to make sacrifices of money and care that he would not have

money and care that he would not have made to the wealthy woman uh to the

made to the wealthy woman uh to the healthy woman and it requires him to

healthy woman and it requires him to treat her with care if she recovers

treat her with care if she recovers because otherwise a relapse would be

because otherwise a relapse would be waiting in the wings. Her illness is

waiting in the wings. Her illness is apparently objective and involuntary as

apparently objective and involuntary as even her doctor will be obliged to

even her doctor will be obliged to testify and it enables her to employ

testify and it enables her to employ without conscious self-reroach. this

without conscious self-reroach. this useful application of a means that she

useful application of a means that she found effective during childhood.

found effective during childhood. >> So why is woman being hysterical later

>> So why is woman being hysterical later in life? Because it allows them to

in life? Because it allows them to control people. Okay, it it draws

control people. Okay, it it draws attention to them. They want attention

attention to them. They want attention but also makes people obey her whims.

but also makes people obey her whims. Okay, this is gaslighting. All right,

Okay, this is gaslighting. All right, this is peer and other gaslighting. And

this is peer and other gaslighting. And the guys, this is what psychology is

the guys, this is what psychology is just peer and other gaslighting. Okay.

All right. Um the problem of course is how do you convince your patient that

how do you convince your patient that this is true and so he develops a mind

this is true and so he develops a mind control technique called dream analysis.

control technique called dream analysis. Okay this is his book from the book

Okay this is his book from the book interp interpretation of dreams. Okay

interp interpretation of dreams. Okay and it's all just mind control crap

and it's all just mind control crap where the patient is trying to recall

where the patient is trying to recall dreams and you're brainwashing that

dreams and you're brainwashing that patient. Okay? Because if you've

patient. Okay? Because if you've discussed memory that that the person

discussed memory that that the person like I know what I saw, right? But his

like I know what I saw, right? But his dreams then you can implant false

dreams then you can implant false memories. Then you can make suggestions.

memories. Then you can make suggestions. You can hypnotize that person. Okay? And

You can hypnotize that person. Okay? And so psychology becomes now mind control.

so psychology becomes now mind control. Okay. So can you read?

Okay. So can you read? I think everyone who occupies himself

I think everyone who occupies himself with dreams will recognize as a very

with dreams will recognize as a very common phenomenon that fact that a the

common phenomenon that fact that a the fact that a dream will give proof of the

fact that a dream will give proof of the knowledge and a recollection of matters

knowledge and a recollection of matters of which the dreamer in his waking state

of which the dreamer in his waking state did not imagine himself to be cog

did not imagine himself to be cog cognizant cognizant in my analytic

cognizant cognizant in my analytic investigations of the nervous patients

investigations of the nervous patients of which I shall speak later. I find

of which I shall speak later. I find that it happens many times every week

that it happens many times every week that I am able to convince them from

that I am able to convince them from their dreams that they are perfectly

their dreams that they are perfectly well acquainted with quotations, obscene

well acquainted with quotations, obscene expressions, etc.

expressions, etc. >> Okay? So, do you understand? So, when

>> Okay? So, do you understand? So, when when the person is talking about his

when the person is talking about his dream, you can now make suggestions and

dream, you can now make suggestions and that person will believe whatever crap

that person will believe whatever crap you tell him. Okay? And that's a secret

you tell him. Okay? And that's a secret of mind control. And guess what, guys?

of mind control. And guess what, guys? We still use this crap today. All right?

We still use this crap today. All right? All right. So um Floyd is of course

All right. So um Floyd is of course gaslighting everyone because he has to

gaslighting everyone because he has to protect his patrons the Frankus and the

protect his patrons the Frankus and the Frankus will allow him to get very will

Frankus will allow him to get very will become very famous. He'll get a lot of

become very famous. He'll get a lot of awards. When the Nazis come to power

awards. When the Nazis come to power they he'll go to England where he's well

they he'll go to England where he's well treated. He joins the Royal Academy. Um

treated. He joins the Royal Academy. Um the British protect him and the British

the British protect him and the British will then spread his views. Okay. He has

will then spread his views. Okay. He has a uh disciple Carl Young who will take

a uh disciple Carl Young who will take his for ideas and turn it into a

his for ideas and turn it into a understanding a systematic understanding

understanding a systematic understanding of how the mind works and from this will

of how the mind works and from this will develop neuroscience. Okay. Um the

develop neuroscience. Okay. Um the problem with all this this is public

problem with all this this is public problem with all this is asan tells us

problem with all this is asan tells us it's all selfdirected inwards which

it's all selfdirected inwards which gives us nowhere. Okay. It's just you

gives us nowhere. Okay. It's just you looking into yourself. It's naval gazing

looking into yourself. It's naval gazing and from that you learn no truth at all.

and from that you learn no truth at all. But that's the entire basis of our

But that's the entire basis of our society.

And so um so yeah so this is so our so this um

um so yeah so this is so our so this um understanding of the mind becomes

understanding of the mind becomes reflected in popular culture. Okay.

reflected in popular culture. Okay. U back to Macan he tells us that to be

U back to Macan he tells us that to be truly free we all have to be free. We

truly free we all have to be free. We have to be free together. Okay. In each

have to be free together. Okay. In each other we find meaning, purpose and love.

other we find meaning, purpose and love. Okay. Not in oursel but in each other.

Okay. Not in oursel but in each other. That's a difference. And so this leads

That's a difference. And so this leads us to a question. Okay. And this is a

us to a question. Okay. And this is a question I don't know this today. It's

question I don't know this today. It's all speculation. The question I want to

all speculation. The question I want to leave with with you today is is Marxism,

leave with with you today is is Marxism, liberalism, individualism, Darwinism,

liberalism, individualism, Darwinism, psychology ops meant to turn us into

psychology ops meant to turn us into slaves? Okay, that's a question that you

slaves? Okay, that's a question that you have to carry with you. I don't know the

have to carry with you. I don't know the answer to I don't know the answer to to

answer to I don't know the answer to to that. Okay, I'm just providing you with

that. Okay, I'm just providing you with a theory and these connections we don't

a theory and these connections we don't know how close they are. Okay, it may it

know how close they are. Okay, it may it may not it may just be random

may not it may just be random coincidence. It could be cause and

coincidence. It could be cause and effect. We don't know. Okay, but this

effect. We don't know. Okay, but this something that you will have to ask

something that you will have to ask yourself as you continue your study.

yourself as you continue your study. Okay, so this shows us in alliance

Okay, so this shows us in alliance between the Sabatine Franks and the

between the Sabatine Franks and the British Empire. And so next class will

British Empire. And so next class will be our last class and in our last class

be our last class and in our last class we'll talk about the past Judea. Okay,

we'll talk about the past Judea. Okay, which is a culmination of all these

which is a culmination of all these trends. All right, any questions, guys?

Okay, great. So, I will see everyone next class.

Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video

Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds

One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps

Paste YouTube URL

Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript

Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds

Get Our Chrome Extension

Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.

Add to Chrome — Free

Works with YouTube, Coursera, Udemy and more educational platforms

Get Instant Transcripts: Just Edit the Domain in Your Address Bar!

YouTube

←

→

↻

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

YoutubeToText

←

→

↻

https://youtubetotext.net/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

YouTube TranscriptPreparing your results…

YouTube Transcript:Secret History #27: Empire of Evil