0:30 [Music] um
0:30 um
0:33 i'm virtually certain some of you know
0:35 him already
0:39 uh he is dr greg lester he's a
0:41 licensed clinical and consulting psychologist
0:43 psychologist
0:45 he's held membership on the graduate
0:48 faculty of the university of st
0:51 thomas is on the continuing education
0:53 faculty of cross country
0:56 education and his senior research director
0:56 director
1:00 with the improvement research group um
1:04 greg's talk our presentation today
1:08 is entitled the difficult client talking
1:08 to those
1:11 who can't listen so with that i turn it
1:13 over to you dr lester
1:14 all right thanks very much dude i
1:16 appreciate edge
1:19 all right hello everyone welcome it's
1:21 nice to be with you i've missed being
1:21 with you guys
1:24 uh since we didn't have the aha last
1:26 year and i've tried to come
1:30 in uh in previous years so i've had to
1:32 cancel a couple times my travel schedule
1:34 got a little crazy i was
1:36 traveling about 40 weeks a year and
1:38 started to come back
1:42 so first thing i want to note
1:45 is i am not one of you um i do not rent
1:46 a crisis
1:49 pregnant a crisis pregnancy center etc i
1:52 am a psychologist
1:55 but my specialty is one that is a little odd
1:56 odd
1:57 there are only about six people in the
2:00 world who uh teach this
2:03 and it is one that cuts across
2:05 all areas of both mental health and
2:06 believe it or not
2:11 ministry there was a study done
2:13 by the university of hawaii in
2:14 conjunction with loyola
2:18 in chicago that found that
2:21 ministers see more people with
2:23 diagnosable mental health conditions
2:25 than all mental health clinicians combined
2:27 combined
2:29 and i consider you guys to be a
2:32 combination of ministry and clinical
2:36 so you see a lot
2:38 of what i'm going to describe today in
2:40 fact the data show
2:42 that the thing we call a personal
2:44 disorder is the most common mental
2:46 health condition
2:48 also the least understood even by most
2:50 mental health clinicians
2:52 the data show we've done studies all
2:54 over the world north and south america
2:56 australia new zealand scandinavia
2:58 southern europe western europe romania
3:01 japan china south korea taiwan zambia and
3:02 and
3:04 all of those studies show that somewhere
3:06 between 15 and 19
3:09 of people have lives that are harmed in
3:10 the way i'll be describing
3:12 and in clinical population people like
3:14 you see in crisis
3:17 somewhere between 39 and 100 of your
3:19 clientele will present
3:22 with these conditions now the reason you
3:24 should care about that and the reason
3:25 i'm here
3:27 i always think it's first thing speakers
3:30 today is why you should bother listening
3:32 is these people don't listen like you
3:34 and i do these people do not have the
3:37 psychological equipment
3:39 to be able to have the kind of
3:42 conversations that you and i have with
3:43 each other
3:46 that make an impact and what we've found
3:49 over we now have 60 years of research on
3:52 this population
3:54 is that there are specific ways you can
3:55 think about them
3:58 and specific methods you can add to how
4:00 you talk to them
4:03 to double your impact increase about
4:04 like 100 100
4:07 you know 60 years ago we couldn't say
4:09 that 60 years ago the lore was forget
4:11 you can't help these people there's
4:13 nothing we can do to make a difference
4:15 these conditions are permanent well
4:19 fortunately we have so much data now
4:22 that that is not true anymore one of our
4:24 gurus in the field was a psychiatrist
4:25 unfortunately passed away a few years
4:28 ago at harvard named john gunderson
4:30 and he was one of the engineers of
4:31 getting personnel disorders listed in
4:33 the diagnostic manual
4:36 back in 1980 and one of his final books
4:36 he says
4:39 we know so much about helping this
4:40 population that we can now ethically say
4:42 to these clients yes
4:44 i can help you so let me tell you what
4:45 we're going to do today
4:48 because i work a lot with
4:50 crisis pregnancy groups i've worked with
4:52 you guys um
4:54 i i spoke a catholic i was the keynote
4:55 speaker catholic charities
4:58 annual conference one year i'll be doing
4:59 two days
5:01 in october for the texas crisis
5:03 pregnancy network etc
5:06 so i am familiar with the clientele uc
5:10 with what you have to uh
5:12 what you're up against and what you do
5:13 so what i'm going to do today is
5:16 focus what we have found in the
5:17 personality disorder
5:21 area works for you to apply
5:25 in your context in your
5:28 situation with your clientele now to do that
5:29 that
5:30 i'm gonna have to do a couple of things
5:32 and i want you to know this is a crash course
5:34 course
5:35 my most basic course on personal
5:37 disorders is six hours long
5:40 and my fundamental course is 18 hours long
5:40 long
5:43 i now have about 45 minutes with you so
5:45 let me tell you what we're going to do
5:46 first i'm going to tell you how we came
5:48 to see this so you know what the
5:50 terminology means
5:53 then i will show you what a personal
5:55 disorder is there's a graphic
5:58 that describes it so you can see why
6:00 this population people come to you in a
6:02 crisis pregnancy situation who have a pre
6:03 pre
6:05 pre-existing personality disorder are
6:06 coming to you
6:10 missing important psychological pieces
6:11 and if you try to have a normal
6:13 conversation with them it's not going to happen
6:14 happen
6:16 so i'll show you what it looks like it's
6:17 not complicated
6:19 you'll be able to get it then i'm going
6:22 to give you half a dozen techniques
6:25 drawn from our literature that we have
6:27 found are kind of the most
6:31 powerful in making an impact
6:33 i'm not going to ask you to change
6:34 everything you do
6:36 i'm going to give you some things to add
6:40 on and some methods to adjust
6:42 what you do to have an impact now those
6:44 aren't going to hurt anybody so you don't
6:44 don't
6:46 if if someone isn't personal disorder
6:48 and you do the things i'm going to tell
6:49 you to do you're not going to hurt it's
6:50 going to be fine
6:51 it just isn't going to make that much
6:53 difference but it makes a difference
6:55 with this population
6:58 so you know you and i overlap
7:01 and we're in the same business of saving lives
7:02 lives
7:04 you know you say them one way i save
7:05 them another way because the personal
7:06 disorder diagnosis
7:09 increases suicide risk by 700 percent
7:12 borderline disordered people have a
7:14 suicide rate 400 times the general
7:16 population and 800 800
7:17 times the population of women
7:19 childbearing years
7:21 so we're in the same business in that
7:22 sense so having an
7:26 impact for you and for me is paramount
7:27 so let me tell you how we came to see
7:30 this you guys real quick
7:31 you gotta understand that mental health
7:33 is a new science you know
7:36 i am not a minister i'm a scientist i am
7:38 i'm gonna call myself a mechanic of the mind
7:38 mind
7:40 and our science started only about a
7:42 hundred years ago when the first
7:45 condition identified as psychiatric
7:46 and what i'm going to use occasionally
7:48 you guys is a white board i'm going to
7:50 write on it so forgive the crude nature
7:51 of my
7:55 graphics but we found the powerpoints
7:59 kind of uh frees people's brains
8:01 so the first condition you've heard this
8:02 term that was ever
8:05 uh coined for a mental health condition
8:08 in the early 1900s
8:19 now that term literally means
8:22 misperception of consensual reality what
8:23 it means is
8:25 the reason someone's life doesn't work
8:26 is there see
8:29 they see and hear things that's all it
8:30 means it doesn't tell you why
8:34 it's called descriptive pathology
8:37 so the first condition ever
8:41 identified as a mental health condition
8:43 that damaged people's lives and kept
8:45 them from living good lives with the
8:47 thing called psychotic that term was
8:49 coined by a neurologist named emil creplin
8:50 creplin
8:52 and you know people who hear voices who
8:54 have hallucinations
8:58 have delusions very severe psychiatric
9:01 symptoms so we identified that early on
9:03 as a thing as a condition it's
9:06 considered consistent across the world
9:08 it's as consistent as pneumonia or
9:09 anything else
9:10 we didn't know what in the world to do
9:13 with it so the answer was they couldn't
9:14 function in society
9:17 we put them into asylums we warehouse
9:18 them and
9:21 and it was a sad era you guys um they
9:23 were not good places the first
9:26 asylum in in england was in a town called
9:26 called
9:30 bedlam that's why this the phrase became
9:32 something total bedlam
9:35 because it was lousy along came
9:38 another neurologist in the 20s who
9:40 noticed there were other people whose
9:42 lives that didn't work well
9:45 but they weren't quote crazy they didn't
9:45 see and hear
9:48 things but they had emotional reactions they
9:49 they
9:52 to the situation they were depressed and
9:53 nothing was wrong
9:55 they were a panicky and nothing was
9:57 dangerous they were anxious
10:00 and nothing was threatening to them so
10:02 they didn't misperceive reality but they
10:04 had emotional reactions that were
10:06 inappropriate to the situation you know
10:07 if you have upset
10:09 feelings that are appropriate that's in
10:10 normal limits
10:14 like uh regrettably about uh 10 days ago
10:15 pam and i lost our
10:17 little kitty cat of 13 years mango you know
10:19 know
10:22 i cried over him for three straight days
10:25 and you know what that was appropriate
10:25 loved him
10:27 he slept with us every night he was a
10:29 wonderful pet
10:31 so you know i boo-hooed but you know
10:32 what if someone's crying
10:35 all day every day in normal life that's
10:38 inappropriate that's something wrong
10:42 so he gave a name to people who have
10:44 emotional reactions that didn't fit the
10:46 situation to contrast it to
10:49 psychotic he called it being neurotic
10:56 and you've heard that term right all
10:57 neurotic means is
11:08 it means that your emotional state
11:12 is inappropriate to the situation
11:15 now this the neurologist who came up
11:16 with this term you might have heard of
11:17 his name was
11:20 sigmund freud and he said
11:24 i actually think we can fix these people
11:27 and so his conclusion is that the reason
11:28 people are having inappropriate
11:30 emotional reactions
11:32 is that they had an emotional reaction
11:33 that was appropriate
11:36 a long time ago to something they were
11:38 abused and so of course they were upset
11:40 they were abandoned so of course they
11:43 were upset and what happened was
11:46 that upset from that event never went away
11:47 away
11:50 so he developed a way to go back in time
11:53 to find out where it started in order to
11:54 resolve it
11:55 and he developed a model that you've
12:07 and the job of psychoanalysis is to
12:09 review back to your life to find out
12:12 where did this bad feeling start
12:14 what was it that happened that made you
12:16 feel this way
12:19 and then the an analytic process is a
12:21 psychological process designed to
12:24 disconnect you from that
12:27 to get that not to run you and then that
12:30 fades and you have emotional reactions
12:32 appropriate to the current era
12:33 pretty intelligent actually
12:35 psychoanalysis gets a lot of contentious
12:37 humor thank you woody allen
12:39 but it's a pretty good model for doing
12:41 that but here was the problem
12:44 we had two conditions we had
12:47 psychotic people who we were locking up
12:48 because they couldn't function in society
12:49 society
12:51 and neurotic people who were doing
12:52 psychoanalysis with
12:55 to unhook them from old bad feelings
12:57 well here was the problem
13:01 come along 1950 we found that there were
13:02 people who didn't fit either one of
13:04 these things
13:06 they weren't quote crazy and doing bizarre
13:07 bizarre
13:09 and sometimes bad things so we didn't
13:10 lock them up
13:13 but psychoanalysis failed with them and
13:15 all this going back in their life to
13:16 their childhood
13:19 went nowhere in fact some of them it
13:20 actually made
13:23 them worse so what happened was we realized
13:24 realized
13:25 that there were some people who had
13:27 lives that were in trouble
13:29 who are behaving badly who are
13:30 experiencing distress
13:32 causing trouble for themselves and
13:34 others even like psychotic people do
13:36 but they didn't fit psychosis and they
13:38 didn't fit neurosis psychoanalysis
13:39 didn't work and we shouldn't lock them up
13:40 up
13:42 and we didn't know what to do so in the
13:45 1970s the american psychiatric
13:46 association said hey
13:49 we have to redo our science so we have a
13:51 way to think about these people we're
13:52 not helping or we don't
13:55 understand so they put a very famous
13:58 committee together called the dsm-3
14:00 committee and the committee sat down
14:01 with the science
14:03 and looked at it and said it just
14:06 doesn't work we're going to start over
14:10 so they through the previous manuals one
14:13 was published in 1952 and one in 1968 in
14:14 the trash
14:17 and said we're going to redo mental
14:19 health in a way that encompasses
14:21 all the people that we're trying to help
14:22 and don't and they said
14:25 here's how we're going to do it we're
14:28 going to do it by what things look like
14:29 and some people psychologically
14:32 malfunction in a way that looks like
14:34 is the is the psychological version of a
14:42 it resembles an illness only in our
14:43 mental health
14:44 and the reason it resembles an illness
14:54 things like depression things like anxiety
14:55 anxiety
14:57 things like attention deficits things
14:58 like addiction
15:01 and those symptoms work very similarly
15:03 to how physical
15:05 illnesses work because they run a
15:12 predictable and reliable course
15:16 you know covert runs a course um
15:18 a head cold runs a course the flu runs
15:20 the course well so does depression
15:23 so do panic attacks so do psychotic episodes
15:24 episodes
15:28 so so do manic episodes and so when you
15:29 look at people who have trouble
15:32 psychologically in some ways some of
15:34 them look like they have the mental health
15:34 health
15:37 version of the thing we think of as an illness
15:38 illness
15:39 so they said we're going to call stuff
15:42 like that psychiatric illnesses
15:45 because they look like illnesses
15:46 and we're going to put them in a
15:48 diagnostic category we call it axis
15:51 one and we're going to give them names
15:52 that they're up for the symptoms depression
15:53 depression
15:56 major depressive episode bipolar dysthymia
15:58 dysthymia
16:02 anxiety generalized anxiety phobia panic
16:03 social we're going to keep the term
16:05 psychotic because that is
16:07 symptom and we're going to put in other
16:08 names like attention deficit
16:12 addiction all symptomatic conditions
16:14 just like we have symptomatic physical
16:16 conditions and they said but here's
16:18 where we missed the boat
16:21 not everybody who functions badly in life
16:22 life
16:25 works like that other people malfunction
16:27 in a way that looks like the thing
16:36 in medicine we call a disorder
16:38 now the way an illness differs from a
16:39 disorder is that an
16:41 illness is acquired and this is
16:43 something you get something you have
16:47 you catch covet i caught covet
16:48 i caught it before anyone knew what it
16:50 was i consider myself patient zero for colorado
16:51 colorado
16:53 because i came back from a trip on the coast
16:54 coast
16:57 last year in late january with a quote
16:58 weird flu
17:00 and those of you have heard me talk
17:02 before i'm a fitness fanatic
17:04 you know i just had my physical last
17:06 week and i scored the highest level and
17:08 the 99 of fitness for people my age
17:10 and when i walked up a set of stairs
17:12 with this flu i couldn't breathe
17:14 i would be gasping for air and thinking
17:16 have i let myself go
17:18 and then of course i gave it to everyone
17:19 i know my wife
17:21 my best friend his wife my martial arts
17:22 school so i
17:25 kind of patient zero but it ran a course
17:27 okay and we all recovered and we're all
17:29 fine and we're all vaccinated so thank
17:31 you god you know what's interesting to me
17:32 me
17:33 pam's symptoms are a little different
17:36 from mine you know tom hanks and rita
17:39 uh wilson actors they caught it in
17:41 australia and i had exactly the same
17:43 course of symptoms he had and pam had
17:45 exactly the same course of symptoms she had
17:45 had
17:48 so we know the illness has run a course
17:50 the difference is a disorder isn't
17:53 caught it isn't acquired it's indigenous
17:54 to the system
17:58 it is a system gone haywire so notice
17:58 when you
18:01 have the flu we don't say have a flu disorder
18:01 disorder
18:04 i notice when you have diabetes we don't
18:05 say you caught diabetes you see who
18:07 developed a metabolic disorder so
18:08 disorders are developed
18:11 and illnesses are acquired and disorders
18:12 don't have
18:15 symptoms disorders have what are called characteristics
18:16 characteristics
18:19 see these were first called character disorders
18:20 disorders
18:22 because they're characteristic not symptomatic
18:23 symptomatic
18:25 we dropped that because we were afraid
18:27 it sounded more realistic and we're not
18:29 trying to be moralistic
18:31 trying to be scientific the difference
18:33 between a symptom and a characteristic
18:36 is a symptom cause is trouble just by
18:37 being there
18:39 i couldn't catch my breath when i had
18:41 covered that was a problem
18:43 a characteristic isn't a problem of
18:46 being there because it feels like you
18:48 it's that it makes trouble for you so
18:51 when you develop high blood pressure
18:52 that's not going to bother you what's
18:55 going to bother you is it causes a
18:56 stroke or a heart attack
18:59 and characteristics and a disorder don't
19:00 run a course
19:02 they're what are called pervasive and enduring
19:04 enduring
19:06 in other words they stick around and
19:10 they're all over the place so the
19:11 committee said what we
19:14 figured out is that
19:17 some people have psychological condition
19:19 causing trouble that looks like an
19:21 illness because it has symptoms that run
19:22 a course where
19:24 other people seem to have a characteristic
19:26 characteristic
19:29 pervasive and enduring pattern that
19:31 doesn't bother them but causes trouble
19:32 for themselves and
19:35 others like a disorder and they said
19:36 this looks so different
19:38 than any other thing we ever thought of
19:40 that we're going to separate it into a
19:41 separate category and they called it
19:43 axis 2.
19:44 and they said you know what this looks
19:46 like a disorder of you know looks like
19:48 it's out of whack over here what it
19:50 looks like is out of whack over here is
19:52 the psychological system
19:55 called the person see this over here on
19:56 the left
19:59 looks like what someone gets or has this
20:00 on the right
20:03 looks like the way a person is so we're
20:05 going to call it a disorder of the
20:06 system of the person
20:14 now the name we use for how we
20:16 experience the system of the person
20:18 another per a person now the
20:20 system of the person another human being
20:23 is we call it their personality
20:25 so we're going to call this a disorder
20:26 the system the person or a
20:33 and they said now we know why we failed
20:34 these people because
20:37 up until we we did the science
20:39 everything we did was designed for symptoms
20:40 symptoms
20:43 all the medications the antidepressants
20:45 the anxiety the antipsychotics
20:48 they're all for symptoms all of our
20:50 psychotherapy psychoanalysis
20:52 object relations behavior cognitive
20:53 therapy for
20:57 symptoms and guess what symptomatic
20:58 treatment doesn't work for
21:00 characteristic problems
21:02 you can't treat diabetes with an antibiotic
21:04 antibiotic
21:06 so these people on the right are the
21:08 people we didn't know how to think about
21:11 and we couldn't help and this
21:13 is the distinction we were missing
21:14 because freud didn't make the
21:16 distinction neither did crepelin
21:18 and they said well doggone it now we understand
21:19 understand
21:21 why everything we developed in mental
21:23 health for the last 80 years has
21:25 failed with these people on the right because
21:26 because
21:29 they have something wrong with how they are
21:30 are
21:33 not that they've forgotten a symptom
21:35 so they said cool now let's come up with
21:37 names for the different versions
21:41 and it took us about 10 years
21:43 and we have pretty well established
21:44 there are ten different types of
21:46 personality disorders
21:48 and we have names for them they're
21:49 called things like
21:52 paranoid schizoids schizotypal borderline
21:53 borderline
21:56 anti-social histrionic narcissistic
21:57 avoidant dependent
22:00 obsessive compulsive so we have criteria
22:02 for diagnosing
22:04 they are consistent across planet earth
22:06 we've studied other ones passive
22:08 aggressive self-defeating sadistic
22:10 they haven't held up well and so over
22:12 the last three diagnostic
22:16 manuals the dsm-3 in 1980 the dsm-4
22:20 1994 and the dsm-5 in 2013 and i was on
22:21 the committee
22:23 that revised the personnel sort of
22:25 section for dsm-5
22:28 i ran one of the research sites we have
22:30 established over 50 years that this is a
22:33 valid important condition
22:36 but the difficulty for you guys is it
22:37 isn't going to show up as quite
22:38 psychiatric because they're
22:41 symptomatic they're not going to look
22:43 superficially like someone with a mental
22:45 health condition
22:48 now what we've found you guys
22:50 is that the personal disorders are so
22:51 different from
22:54 psychiatric symptomatic conditions that
22:55 we had to
22:58 change everything and a whole
23:01 almost cult-like group of us have gone
23:02 into personality sort of work
23:04 and we have our own journals on experts
23:06 and your garden variety
23:08 mental health clinician does not
23:09 understand this stuff
23:13 so what we have found is this what we
23:14 call a psychiatric
23:17 condition is a malfunction of the
23:20 psychology or neurology of a person
23:22 for example we know that depression is caused
23:23 caused
23:26 by a malfunction in the limbic system in
23:27 the brain
23:30 there are things called 5-ht receptors that
23:30 that
23:32 have to do with a neurotransmitter we've
23:34 heard of called serotonin they don't
23:35 work right
23:37 and so we develop drugs that enhance
23:39 serotonin to treat depression
23:41 it's a malfunctional limbic system we
23:43 know that that post-traumatic stress
23:46 disorder we call it disorder synonymous is
23:47 is
23:48 caused by the amygdala in the
23:50 hippocampus forming a loop
23:53 francine shapiro and a thing called emdr
23:54 figured this out
23:56 and we have to unhook that loop in their brain
23:57 brain
23:59 we know that a tension deficit is a
24:01 screw up of the executive functions
24:03 right here in the prefrontal orbital
24:05 lobes the russell barkley has developed
24:07 ways to moderate with the stimulant
24:10 medications and the non-stimulants etc
24:13 so we know that all of those are a
24:15 crossed wire and a short circuit
24:18 a personality disorder completely different
24:19 different
24:22 let me draw it for you
24:24 here's a personality now normal personality
24:27 personality
24:29 is your toolkit for living life and in
24:31 it your tools are called
24:32 traits so i'm going to draw a bunch of
24:34 traits here's a trait
24:37 here's a trait here's a trait you have
24:40 those are your hammer saws and nails and what
24:41 what
24:43 your normal personality gives you is the
24:46 flexibility to handle life's curves
24:48 there's a trait called introversion it
24:49 allows you to
24:52 enjoy solitude and recovery there's a
24:54 trait called extroversion
24:56 it allows you to attach to people connect
24:57 connect
25:00 there's a trait called conscientiousness
25:01 that allows you to be detailed
25:04 and to be refined when you need to fill
25:06 out your tax return and not get audited
25:07 by the evil irs
25:10 and a normal personality has enough
25:11 traits in it
25:13 to where you can be the different ways
25:16 you need to be at different times
25:18 there's a place in munich called the max
25:20 blank institute for human developments
25:22 the largest research program in human
25:23 development in the world
25:26 and they call personality your adaptive tool
25:26 tool
25:29 kit now you don't have to be perfectly
25:30 flexible or adaptive you have to be
25:32 adaptive enough
25:35 so when i'm doing psychotherapy with a
25:38 patient i'm in therapist mode
25:40 i'm making interpretations drawing connections
25:42 connections
25:44 looking at history when i'm at home with
25:46 my wife pam i'm in husband mode
25:48 i don't treat her like a patient trust
25:50 me that would not go
25:53 well when i'm on a roller coaster i'm in
25:55 roller coaster mode screaming and yelling
25:56 yelling
25:58 when i'm at a funeral i'm in funeral
26:00 mode and i'm somber
26:04 and reverent you know so you have all
26:06 these different ways of being now here's
26:08 what we've discovered you guys
26:10 in some human beings as they're developing
26:12 developing
26:15 that system fails and they end up with only
26:15 only
26:18 one way to be in their toolkit
26:21 and that's all they have and they don't
26:23 have another way to be
26:25 so it's not that they have a symptom
26:26 what's wrong with them
26:29 is they're missing alternative ways to
26:31 be they're not flexible they're not
26:32 adaptive the way they are
26:34 isn't inappropriate when they're in a
26:36 situation where it's appropriate
26:38 but it's inappropriate at other times so
26:39 we don't call these people sick we call
26:40 them inappropriate
26:42 paranoid personality disorder means you
26:44 have only one way to be you're
26:46 you're suspicious all the time of everyone
26:47 everyone
26:49 a therapist says you can trust me
26:51 someone with paranoid personality goes
26:52 why would they be
26:55 saying that to me because they're always suspicious
26:56 suspicious
26:58 someone with dependent personal disorder
27:00 is always submissive
27:02 they can't think for themselves so you
27:04 say think for yourself and they go
27:06 we have to tell me how to do that i had
27:08 a patient literally say to me
27:10 but what are the rules for making up my
27:12 own rules pardon me
27:15 narcissistic personality disorder people
27:16 are self-confident but they have no
27:18 right to be self-confident
27:19 if you know what you're doing
27:21 self-confidence makes sense but if you
27:23 don't you should be a beginner
27:25 but a nurse is always grandiose and self-righteous
27:26 self-righteous
27:28 they're like oh i know it i know
27:30 everything i know all about that
27:33 i had dinner with one and i just was
27:35 feeling evil
27:36 and something came up that said oh this
27:38 thing happened i go oh i know about that
27:39 and i knew they didn't
27:42 so i said okay tell me what i was just
27:44 being sadistic
27:46 they're like oh well uh well uh i mean
27:48 they didn't have a way to say
27:51 i don't know so what we found is that
27:53 people with personal disorders are
27:56 missing psychological pieces you take
27:57 for granted
27:59 you know people can must be missing a
28:00 foot we know what narcissists are missing
28:01 missing
28:03 empathy they don't know what it is they
28:04 don't have it
28:06 you know how people convincing a kidney
28:09 people with antisocial are missing
28:12 honor and remorse
28:14 you know how you can be missing an eye
28:15 well some people are missing independence
28:17 independence
28:20 and so we were shocked to find out that
28:22 what this condition is is these are incomplete
28:24 incomplete
28:27 people you know we have that phrase
28:30 people we say they're not all there you know
28:31 know
28:34 it's true so what we found was no wonder
28:35 we weren't helping them
28:38 because we were trying to repair things
28:40 that cause symptoms
28:42 where these people they're missing
28:44 pieces that you and i take for
28:48 granted in the movie uh collateral jamie foxx
28:48 foxx
28:50 plays an avoidant personality sort of
28:52 cab driver who realizes
28:54 he's driving around a psychopath play
28:56 but tom cruise is a hitman
28:59 on his heads and he finally gets mad and
29:00 he looks in the rearview mirror and he
29:02 says to tom cruise
29:05 what happened to you you are missing
29:08 pieces that are automatic for a human being
29:09 being
29:12 and that's a little action movie now we
29:14 found out after we started working
29:16 successfully with these clients
29:19 that there's something else missing too you
29:20 you
29:22 have a have an ability and we have a
29:24 name for that ability we call it the
29:26 ability to self-correct
29:28 now that you take for granted because
29:30 it's automatic but it's a high level
29:33 cognitive function it requires a meta
29:34 observational position
29:37 self-objectification self awareness
29:39 self-control and self-regulation
29:41 our name for that in personal disorder
29:43 work is your observing
29:46 ego so we draw it like an eyeball
29:48 you are watching yourself and when you
29:51 mess up you do better next time
29:53 we found that whatever disables the
29:54 growth of diverse trades i'm not going
29:56 to bore you with that
29:58 also disables observing ego so to make
30:00 the point it doesn't work i'm gonna draw
30:01 a circle around it
30:03 and put one of the european slashy
30:04 things through it to show it doesn't work
30:04 work
30:06 here's the key for you guys to pay
30:08 attention you
30:10 are accustomed to talking to people who
30:12 have an observing ego
30:15 you and their observing ego talk you
30:16 give them information
30:18 and you expect them to be able to take
30:19 the information
30:23 and apply it to themselves these people
30:26 can't do it the whole reason you fail
30:26 with them
30:28 is they don't have the
30:30 self-observational function
30:32 to take the brochures you give them the
30:34 videos you show them
30:37 the the advice you present and apply it
30:40 to make good decisions not because
30:42 they're missing the information
30:44 it's that they're missing the function
30:46 to make use of the information
30:48 see this is where you guys run into a
30:49 brick wall
30:51 you want to give them the pamphlet you
30:53 want to show them the video you want to
30:56 tell them the data well guess what
30:59 it's all correct and it doesn't make any difference
30:59 difference
31:02 because they're missing the function
31:04 you're expecting to take the information
31:06 go oh
31:09 i get it i need to you know have this
31:11 child and make the world
31:15 better and they don't get it it's not
31:18 if there's no they in there to do the getting
31:19 getting
31:23 okay and what we found you guys is this
31:27 dual deficiency of trait
31:32 diversity and observing equal capacity
31:34 changes their functioning to where they
31:36 do screwy things
31:40 over and over john leslie who was
31:41 one of the people who ran the committee
31:44 arizona for dsm-5 says it this way
31:46 a personality disorder is a human being
31:49 who persists in a behavior
31:51 in the face of clear evidence it's inappropriate
31:52 inappropriate
31:55 and ongoing bad consequences so you can tell
31:56 tell
31:58 that right now i am having a
32:01 conversation with your observing ego
32:02 you are taking in the data the
32:04 information i'm giving you
32:06 and you think going to think of how to
32:07 apply it to your work
32:10 that's because you're not personality disorder
32:10 disorder
32:14 okay but 39 to 100 of your clientele
32:17 are now here's what that means you don't
32:18 have to stop giving them
32:20 information but you have to talk to them
32:22 in a way
32:25 that bypasses the non-work and observing ego
32:26 ego
32:29 in order to have an impact on what
32:33 they're going to do okay so this is the
32:34 thing we found in mental health
32:37 we had to change everything even that we
32:39 were doing
32:41 the work with symptomatic patients
32:42 because it didn't work here and so we developed
32:43 developed
32:45 models that are really good they have
32:47 weird names
32:49 dialectical behavior therapy
32:51 mentalization based treatment
32:53 transference focused psychotherapy
32:55 developmental object relations blah blah
32:56 blah blah
32:58 forget it i'm going to teach you
32:59 techniques from those
33:02 designed to help you have the point you're
33:03 you're
33:06 trying to make make a difference to them
33:10 okay now i've just taken you through
33:12 80 years of research you guys it took us
33:14 forever to understand this stuff okay
33:18 so let me get on let me get my my
33:19 page up here hang on a second my little
33:21 thing isn't working
33:22 i've got some notes i want to make sure
33:24 i get you everything
33:27 on my little uh there we go i went to
33:29 sleep that's why i have a little pad
33:31 electronic pad here
33:40 the point is this none of what you're doing
33:40 doing
33:43 will have an impact with this population
33:45 unless you take into account that
33:47 they're missing psychological structures
33:49 you take for granted
33:52 now let me go through the techniques
33:53 that we have found
33:56 are really helpful here let me get a new
33:57 page out
34:00 okay if you remember nothing else from this
34:01 this
34:03 hour i want you to remember this so if
34:05 you've been snoozing if i put you to
34:07 sleep if the dog's been bargaining to
34:08 feed the cat come back
34:12 i have a technique that is magic
34:15 it's going to sound really stupid really
34:17 basic and when i read it in a book in
34:19 1988 one of the first books written
34:21 and personal source i thought that's the
34:23 dumbest darn thing i ever read
34:27 i started using it this puppy has magic
34:30 freaking powers remember this
34:31 when you're talking with someone who
34:33 isn't getting it
34:36 if you begin to phrase what you tell
34:38 them in a particular way
34:41 it's like a stealth bomber that flies through
34:41 through
34:43 and hits them and the technique is
34:50 e t the search for
34:52 extraterrestrials i'm kidding i'm
34:54 married to a sci-fi junkie so i make
34:56 sci-fi jokes
34:59 what this stands for is you do a three-part
35:00 three-part
35:02 sentence or three it can be three sentences
35:03 sentences
35:06 the first thing you say is a positive
35:07 statement about
35:16 support
35:20 you say something supportive okay
35:21 here's the problem if all you do is
35:23 support you're not going to make any difference
35:24 difference
35:26 but so the first thing you have to do is
35:27 support because if all you do is
35:28 confront you won't make any difference either
35:29 either
35:31 then you make a positive statement about
35:40 okay this is connecting with them that
35:42 opens the terrain to where you can
35:44 hit them over the head with a hammer
35:51 s e t and if you phrase
35:54 everything you say to them with an sct
35:55 you will be
35:58 astonished at how it works
36:02 here's an sct i want you guys
36:05 to learn this technique is so powerful
36:07 you're really going to feel satisfied
36:10 doing it and this is what it sounds like
36:12 see you didn't even hear it did you
36:16 it goes right by you i'm really glad you
36:17 came to the center
36:20 i i'm proud of you for facing this and listen
36:21 listen
36:24 i totally get how hard this decision is
36:25 for you
36:30 and what you're feeling but you know
36:34 you want life to exist like i do
36:38 you see what that does it kind of
36:41 creates a territory that gives an
36:43 opening for you to say the data say the truth
36:44 truth
36:48 and to bypass the yes buts
36:49 and the defenses they're going to use
36:55 i had a man come to see me who was a
36:57 very good man he was a veterinarian of
36:58 all things and
37:00 he was dating and we were talking about
37:02 some life history things he wanted to do
37:04 and he started dating a woman i like it
37:06 because i was picking a personality disorder
37:07 disorder
37:09 and i told him he shouldn't get serious
37:10 with her so it was kind of
37:12 laid down the gauntlet while he quit you
37:14 know he couldn't keep her and me
37:17 so yeah i got killed off eight years
37:18 later he called me up
37:20 and he said he came he looked terrible
37:22 he said my life's a disaster
37:24 you're the only one who this is trouble
37:25 you gotta get me out of this you know
37:27 that's one of those no good deed goes
37:28 and punish things
37:30 how do i get out of this and i said i
37:33 trust we'll try to say this to her no i
37:34 ha i said if you told you want a divorce
37:36 no she'll try to kill i mean he said that
37:36 that
37:39 so so i ended up describing sct and he
37:40 said yes
37:42 i get it that'll work so for three
37:44 months all i did was teach him
37:46 everything he said to his sct
37:48 this was a relationship with darn
37:50 nervous because of her
37:52 i tell you guys i couldn't believe it
37:54 smoothest divorce
37:56 i've ever helped happen and she was
37:57 seriously disorder i mean catastrophically
37:59 catastrophically
38:01 dangerously disordered no property
38:02 rights they had three kids
38:05 no custody battle they had a lot of
38:06 money she was a physician he's a veterinarian
38:07 veterinarian
38:09 and he came and he said i can't believe
38:10 it's gone this smoothly
38:12 why does sct work with her i said well i
38:14 can give you the theories he goes no i
38:15 don't care forget it
38:16 i'm just glad it does i wish i'd known
38:18 it eight years ago thank you save my life
38:18 life
38:21 which i didn't but sct did and i want to
38:22 tell you i got an email from a little
38:23 while back
38:25 that said dear greg i wanted to write
38:27 you and tell you how i am
38:30 my second wife he met a woman he brought
38:32 her in because he wanted me to evaluate
38:34 her she was wonderful he said we're
38:37 married with seven kids they're grown
38:39 you got me start on this new life it's
38:40 now an old life and i want you know it's
38:41 a wonderful life
38:43 and i want you guys to know that i
38:46 hadn't spoken him for 17 years
38:53 sct it was created by a psychologist
38:53 named jerry
38:55 kreisman out of the university of missouri
38:57 missouri
39:00 i have used it with hundreds
39:04 of personality assorted patients and it
39:06 works i have never seen it fail actually
39:08 now i'm sure it has so don't you know
39:09 take my word for that
39:12 but if all you remember is a statement
39:13 of support
39:16 your well-meaning a statement of empathy
39:17 their well-meaning
39:21 the truth the truth can be pretty rough
39:25 but it'll work and there's a lot of
39:28 room for uh how do i say
39:31 uh flexibility or you can do a whole
39:32 bunch of support
39:34 whole bunch empathy brief truth you can
39:36 do a quick support
39:39 quick empathy hard truth use uses it
39:40 according to how
39:42 you work i'm reasonably confronted
39:43 personally sorted
39:46 special disorder specialist we're pretty rough
39:46 rough
39:48 so i try to emphasize the sport and the
39:50 empathy because i'm pretty good at the
39:52 hard truth
39:53 see how what you think but if you
39:56 remember nothing else sct
39:59 is freaking genius magic created by god
40:01 designed for humans i'm telling you i i
40:03 don't believe it when i read it and i
40:04 want to tell what book it's
40:07 the book stinks number two
40:10 people make bad decisions because of
40:19 now what i mean by lack of sorting is
40:20 this population
40:24 cannot tell st something very
40:25 fundamental things about life that come
40:27 naturally for you and here's the most important
40:28 important
40:30 they can't tell the difference between a thought
40:39 a feeling
40:49 and it's when you mix these three up
40:52 that people make bad decisions so a
40:55 very very powerful foy for you to talk
40:56 that will
40:58 open the door for you to have an impact
41:00 is to make sure that when they say
41:02 something you identify
41:04 what they're referring to is thought or
41:06 feeling or behavior because a client
41:09 will say this well i felt like i should
41:11 have an abortion
41:14 that's not a feeling that's a thought so
41:16 you say is so you had the thought
41:20 i should have an abortion now see what
41:23 that does is it constrains
41:26 that to the thought area and it opens up the
41:27 the
41:30 other areas of life to be uncontaminated
41:31 by it
41:36 or they say well you know
41:39 i i i thought i had been bad
41:43 no bad is a feeling and so you say oh
41:47 you felt bad so you identified as a
41:50 feeling and it puts it in its box
41:53 and opens the rest of life
41:56 or you know well they were just
42:00 enraged with me no they
42:02 may have felt rage but what did they
42:03 actually do
42:06 well they yelled at me oh so they yelled
42:07 at you
42:10 and i thought that was bad no you felt
42:12 bad so they yelled at you and you
42:14 felt bad yeah and i felt like i couldn't
42:15 take it
42:17 then you had that thought so they yelled
42:19 at you you felt bad and you had the thought
42:21 thought
42:24 i can't take this do you see that
42:27 how that cleans up thinking feeling behaving
42:28 behaving
42:31 now that i have it sorted and i have
42:31 each of those
42:35 in their realm i can begin to talk about
42:38 other things but as long as that model process
42:39 process
42:41 where they think feelings are thoughts
42:42 and they experience thoughts as
42:43 behaviors and they experience
42:45 behaviors as feelings you're not going
42:47 to get anywhere because it's going to go
42:50 into kind of a whirlpool and this
42:52 population lives in a whirlpool we have
42:54 a name for it we call it drama
42:57 and we even have diagrams how it works
42:58 and to get out of that whirlpool you
43:00 have to get out of that whirlpool to
43:02 talk in a way that makes a difference
43:05 so by sorting that's a g it doesn't look
43:06 like one
43:09 make sure when you're talking you say oh
43:12 so you had the thought such and such oh
43:13 so you felt
43:16 such and such okay oh so
43:19 they did such and such you did such and such
43:19 such
43:22 i told them off well now that's a
43:24 thought tying someone off what did you
43:26 actually say
43:29 so notice you guys i'm not telling you
43:32 what to say here in terms of giving them data
43:33 data
43:36 i'm telling you a method to add on to
43:37 the way you talk
43:40 to give you opening to have an impact
43:41 because listen you've got to move
43:43 heaven and earth to have an impact with
43:45 this population
43:47 the data show it takes in formal psychotherapy
43:48 psychotherapy
43:51 six sessions with them to reach the same
43:53 outcome of one session with a patient
43:54 with symptoms
43:57 so this is a big deal so two
43:59 techniques i've gone over with you so
44:02 far the genius magic
44:04 divinely inspired technique called sct
44:06 support empathy and truth
44:08 and then the fundamental technique
44:10 called sorting to make sure
44:12 that everything's in its place so that
44:15 you're talking outside of the whirlpool
44:15 called the
44:19 drama okay so there's two
44:23 number three
44:28 don't give advice don't give information
44:56 don't say i'd like to give you this brochure
44:57 brochure
44:58 you'll bump right up against no
45:00 observing ego say
45:04 so i want to ask if it's okay with you
45:07 or if i give you a brochure about this
45:10 say well listen i have some advice would
45:11 you like to hear it
45:14 uh my analysts will say to me greg you
45:15 want to know when through went through
45:16 my head while you said that
45:18 i had a patient who was borderline
45:20 personality disorder at a therapy group
45:22 and she got mad at the group and said
45:24 when i bring up a problem you guys give
45:25 me solutions i don't need solutions i
45:27 come up with solutions
45:29 what i need from you is support and
45:31 empathy and understanding she was really mad
45:32 mad
45:34 so she brought up a problem a couple of
45:35 sessions later
45:36 and their silence and one of the group
45:38 members said you know i just put myself
45:39 in your position
45:41 and i know however i have heart by the
45:43 time with that and she goes now see
45:46 that's helping me that's what i need so say
45:46 say
45:48 can i give you some advice about that
45:50 now does it guarantee they'll take it
45:53 of course not does it mean that it'll
45:56 it'll it'll solve everything of course
45:58 not what it means is you won't
46:00 bump up against the missing observing ego
46:01 ego
46:03 with the yes but the justification the
46:05 rationalization and if they say no i
46:06 don't want advice
46:07 don't give it because it wouldn't have
46:09 worked anyway let's say a patient you
46:11 want to know what i think they go not
46:12 really fine
46:15 okay well what else do you want to tell me
46:15 me
46:19 okay all right uh we got a couple of
46:20 last things then we're going to do some
46:22 questions if you've got some in the last
46:24 five minutes it's it's uh 12 52
46:25 so we've got eight minutes left i
46:27 promise not to run over it's hard to
46:28 shut me
46:30 up so i promised i would shut up okay next
46:35 this population is on high defensive
46:36 alert freud
46:39 identified defense mechanisms as a way of
46:40 of
46:42 staying right and when people are afraid
46:43 they're wrong they get defensive this
46:45 population has always spread the wrong
46:47 so they have all these experiences for
46:49 things to work so one of the things you
46:51 need to do with this population
47:01 they don't feel right and they're coming
47:03 to you in crisis which makes it worse anyway
47:04 anyway
47:07 so find some some ways to compliment you
47:09 know i'll say to a new client
47:12 you know i'm really glad you came in
47:13 what you're struggling with
47:16 you're struggling with this by yourself
47:18 that's hard and you know it took guts
47:19 to come sit in this office people don't
47:22 want to it's people are embarrassed
47:24 people feel bad and you know that tells
47:26 me you know what that tells me
47:29 you got guts you know what that tells me
47:31 you can deal with this we can work on
47:32 this because that's what that tells me
47:34 about you
47:35 you can say to a client you know i like
47:38 the way you said that you said that very well
47:39 well
47:41 or good thought that's a way to think
47:43 that i like that that fits
47:46 find some ways to throw that in because
47:47 if all you're doing is telling them you
47:49 should make the the decision i'm telling
47:50 you to make and not the decision you're
47:52 thinking about but
47:54 right up against the lack of observing
47:56 ego so find some ways to compliment and
47:57 tell them they're right
48:00 make sure it's genuine don't lie
48:03 find some ways i don't care if you have
48:04 to say
48:06 those are really attractive shoes you
48:07 know i really like those
48:11 i don't care what it is say something
48:14 good okay let me give you one last
48:16 thing then we'll see if there's some
48:17 questions if not i've got you know
48:19 another six hours i can give you
48:29 this one's helpful too this one's pretty
48:31 powerful so
48:34 people experience and language
48:38 things in either as visual
48:42 can't spell let me redo that i'm sorry
48:53 or physical listen to how they talk and
48:54 use the same language
48:56 some people are visual they say i don't
48:58 see that i don't see it happening that way
48:58 way
49:00 no i can't picture that well say that
49:02 back to them well i'll tell you how i
49:04 see it would you like how i see it
49:06 some people are auditory they say that
49:07 doesn't sound right
49:09 no i don't i i can't hear it that way or
49:11 say well let me tell you it this way
49:14 some people are physical i i don't feel
49:15 like that's true
49:18 i i i don't i don't feel like it's that way
49:18 way
49:20 say well you know you might feel like
49:22 it's so
49:25 listen to what sensory channel
49:28 they speak in and it will tell you what
49:30 sensory channel to speak
49:32 back to them in so listen do they say i
49:33 hear that
49:36 i see that i feel that what do they emphasize
49:36 emphasize
49:39 okay all right so let me review real
49:40 quick and then we will
49:44 see what questions you may have so the
49:46 things that are really applicable to you
49:48 that i can teach you in this length of time
49:49 time
49:52 to add on to what you do are phrasing
49:54 things in an sct
49:56 sort identifying thought feelings and behaviors
49:57 behaviors
49:59 are specific to put them in their realm
50:00 so you have
50:03 opening for to make an impact make sure
50:05 you ask permission so because they're on
50:07 high defensive alert
50:10 and ask permission before you give them something
50:10 something
50:12 because they don't have the observing
50:14 ego to automatically take it in
50:18 and find ways to make them right and
50:20 listen for the predicates they use of which
50:21 which
50:24 system they tend to operate most in and
50:26 be consistent with
50:27 them you know when i i saw professional
50:29 athletes watching the olympics
50:31 and he's and i said well let's find a
50:33 way that won't sideline you from this
50:37 that that feels like you're you're
50:40 out front you know i'm using these these
50:41 metaphors for how
50:44 how they how they experience okay all
50:45 right good you guys let me get rid of my
50:48 white board here
50:51 and any anything you'd like to ask got
50:53 like three minutes left because of
50:54 course i've run over
50:56 uh anything if not i can re-emphasize things
50:57 things
51:04 uh dr lester someone asked if you could um
51:05 um
51:09 repeat uh s-e-t the sec example
51:12 a little bit slower oh yeah i do speak
51:13 fast don't i sure you bet
51:15 so let me get sct up here and i'll do a
51:17 couple slower
51:22 let me get back to my scg hang on okay
51:34 i'm really glad you're here today
51:39 i think it shows you have courage
51:43 and i think that means you know
51:53 i really like the way you said that
51:56 because it says to me you have good
51:57 clear thinking
52:00 you've got a head on your shoulders and
52:02 you're going to be able to
52:04 look at the things i'd tell you at the
52:06 brochure i give you
52:07 and know it's the truth and tell you
52:13 it works like that see the reason it's
52:15 difficult to get
52:18 is that it is so kind of in a good way slick
52:19 slick
52:22 that it goes right by you that's the whole
52:23 whole
52:26 method is it slides right
52:30 in so i understand your
52:31 i understand your desire to have examples
52:33 examples
52:36 it means you want to use this well to
52:38 have an impact with your clients
52:40 do you see i just did it you don't even
52:41 see it do you
52:44 and it just goes right by it so yeah i'm
52:46 sorry i go so fast i appreciate
52:49 your your uh request for me to do it in
52:51 a more
52:54 measured measure tone or
52:57 speed all right we got a minute anything
52:58 else i can do for you in a minute you guys
53:01 guys
53:04 okay so let me finish with this listen
53:05 thank you for the work you're doing you
53:08 guys i hope that that small piece i can
53:11 add for you from what i do can i
53:14 interrupt we have one more question and
53:15 i'm sure of course
53:18 wayne has it go ahead thank you so much um
53:18 um
53:21 so my question is we saw during covid
53:23 the type of client we were serving was
53:26 drastically different than we had served before
53:27 before
53:29 so instead of seeing clients that were
53:31 abortion minded but they were much more
53:33 open to making a life decision we saw
53:35 the clients it was a dead heart stop
53:37 i want an abortion why are you not an
53:40 abortion provider why am i here
53:42 does this thing technique work on them or
53:43 or
53:45 are we talking about a heart matter now
53:46 no no no no no
53:48 that's such a good question for this reason
53:50 reason
53:52 this population when they're threatened
53:53 get more
53:55 rigid because they only have one way to
53:56 be they cling to it
53:58 let's face it the covet pandemic put
54:00 everybody in crisis mode
54:04 so what you're seeing is an amplified
54:06 version of the personality disorder
54:08 where they're just stuck on this
54:09 and you can tell they don't have
54:11 flexibility they have adaptability they
54:13 don't have objective voice in their head
54:15 the answer to your question is
54:18 absolutely these techniques help
54:20 absolutely they are what will make chip
54:22 away at that
54:24 no guarantees with any human being of
54:26 course but your best
54:29 shot with somebody that rigid is this because
54:31 because
54:33 when they're listen when a married
54:35 couple comes in in a crisis
54:38 they're as rigid about this kind of
54:39 stuff as someone is about having an abortion
54:40 abortion
54:43 so we have designed our personal disorder
54:44 disorder
54:46 work to work with the very thing you're
54:47 talking about the
54:51 escalated rigid dramatic absolutist
54:54 not willing to consider no observing ego
54:57 no openness and you can tell
54:59 the techniques i'm teaching you are to
55:02 try to provide openings
55:03 with some people you don't need that
55:06 they're open you give them information
55:08 right you know them they're the ones you like
55:09 like
55:11 but you are right this population has
55:13 been terribly threatened
55:16 with just the covet going on and it puts
55:17 them into
55:20 an excessively rigid and deficient state
55:22 so yes try these with them
55:24 try this with them it helps can you give
55:26 us like one really good example like
55:28 like a sample statement of someone who
55:30 in that type of rigidity is like
55:32 no i'm going to kill my baby where do i go
55:33 go
55:37 okay so your thought is
55:41 i'm gonna go kill my baby i get it
55:44 how does that feel so notice what i did
55:45 i just put the thought into oh that's
55:47 the thought
55:51 now i'm gonna go to another realm that
55:52 isn't addressed because they're
55:54 describing that as their feeling and it isn't
55:55 isn't
55:58 so i'm gonna say well how's that feel
56:01 and they're gonna say see
56:03 you don't know what they're going to say
56:05 that's what you want
56:07 what you want is for them to not know
56:09 what to say
56:11 because now you've got an opening where
56:12 they're not
56:15 certain so by sorting that i'm going to
56:16 kill my baby
56:18 into okay so your thought is i'm going
56:20 to have an abortion i get it
56:22 i get that that i get that that thought
56:24 i get that now
56:27 what's that feel like now
56:28 and then you're going to go elsewhere
56:30 because you're going to put that in its cage
56:30 cage
56:32 and you're going to over or you can say
56:35 use an sct
56:36 i'm glad you're thinking about what to
56:38 do with this pregnancy
56:42 i can see this is really hard for you
56:44 but i think that may be a premature conclusion
56:51 see what that does softens up the territory
56:52 territory
56:54 it's kind of like i'm going to use a
56:56 terrible analogy it's calling in an air strike
56:57 strike
56:59 to clean out some of the defenses before
57:03 you send in your soldiers in the war
57:06 remember you guys remember something
57:09 a clinical conversation is not an advocate
57:10 advocate
57:13 advocacy conversation if you advocate
57:15 with this clientele
57:17 you might as well not bother talking to
57:19 them because they're oppositional
57:21 they're defiant they're rigid they're unreasonable
57:23 unreasonable
57:26 so you do not add clinical conversation
57:27 i have the same purpose as
57:29 advocacy but it doesn't have the same
57:31 method as advocacy
57:32 and what you're trying to do here is
57:34 make an opening so yeah
57:37 try these with that population excellent question
57:38 question
57:40 i appreciate that i already feel
57:42 decompressed by it
57:44 okay i mean you know isn't it
57:46 interesting just in our little example
57:48 how it feels when i do it just an
57:50 example what you can feel what it does
57:50 in your head
57:53 can't you isn't it something and it only
57:55 took us 80 years to figure this stuff out
57:57 out
58:00 doctor i'm gonna let you guys one quick
58:01 one this one's very quick
58:05 i'm gonna do a quick one it came in
58:08 on a chat function do you have a recommendation
58:09 recommendation
58:12 um for where there's a marriage uh
58:15 with a narcissist uh for a therapist in
58:18 la that might be able to deal with that
58:22 okay so uh personal disorder is a pretty
58:25 distinct uh subset so i have
58:27 uh no i don't know anyone personally so
58:29 i'll tell you to find someone
58:33 uh call up ucla in their psychiatry
58:34 department at the hospital
58:36 and ask for someone else good with
58:38 personality disorders
58:40 um medical schools usually have a
58:42 department that has somebody
58:44 that's good at it uh the other thing the
58:46 second thing you can do
58:49 is the mecca a kind of vatican for
58:51 personal disorders is called the meniger
58:53 institute it's in houston as part of
58:54 baylor medical school
58:56 call them up and say who do you know in
58:58 l.a who's good with personality
58:59 disorders because they wrote the book on
59:00 personnel sources they
59:03 did the first study in 1966. so go to
59:05 ucla and say who you got
59:06 or call up men and girl and say who you
59:08 got because you don't want a garden
59:10 variety clinician for this you guys
59:13 they want it will fail okay good question
59:14 question
59:15 all right so you guys i'm going to check
59:17 out and let dan here finish with you
59:19 thank you for having me
59:22 it's always a delight and a joy but i
59:23 hope it's been helpful
59:24 we'll see you again next time i'll let
59:27 you go bye-bye bye-bye
59:30 all right so uh dr lester is signed off but
59:31 but
59:34 nevertheless i thank him it was i
59:36 thought a very useful and
59:40 very informative presentation
59:42 i'm going to offer before we close a
59:45 short closing prayer
59:46 in the name of the father and of the son
59:50 and the holy spirit amen
59:54 having heard um dr lester's presentation
59:56 we renew the prayer that we made at the outset
59:57 outset
60:00 grant that it assists us in furthering our efforts to defend
60:01 our efforts to defend and protect your creation lord
60:05 and protect your creation lord and to defend all that is good
60:09 and to defend all that is good and in accord with your plan for your
60:11 and in accord with your plan for your creation
60:13 creation grant in particular that it um that it
60:16 grant in particular that it um that it assists us in
60:17 assists us in understanding loving and helping persons
60:19 understanding loving and helping persons with personality disorder
60:21 with personality disorder we ask this through christ our lord amen
60:32 [Music] okay so before we leave uh
60:35 okay so before we leave uh let me announce our next presentation uh
60:38 let me announce our next presentation uh we have dr
60:39 we have dr tom glesner of nifla the national
60:41 tom glesner of nifla the national institute of
60:43 institute of family and life advocates i think most
60:46 family and life advocates i think most are
60:47 are probably all of you are familiar with
60:49 probably all of you are familiar with nifla um
60:50 nifla um nipla was the plaintiff in a previous
60:53 nipla was the plaintiff in a previous supreme court case concerning the
60:55 supreme court case concerning the posting of um
60:57 posting of um abortion advocacy outside pro-life
61:00 abortion advocacy outside pro-life counseling centers the visera case which
61:03 counseling centers the visera case which was successful in the supreme court
61:06 was successful in the supreme court tom will present on september 1st the
61:09 tom will present on september 1st the first wednesday
61:10 first wednesday of next month on the topic
61:13 of next month on the topic of the new of the supreme court case
61:16 of the new of the supreme court case that is up
61:16 that is up uh up uh now in the supreme court
61:20 uh up uh now in the supreme court uh dobbs the dobbs case which
61:23 uh dobbs the dobbs case which in which the state of mississippi is
61:25 in which the state of mississippi is challenging roe v
61:26 challenging roe v wade and tom's presentation will be
61:30 wade and tom's presentation will be the mississippi case and the inevitable
61:34 the mississippi case and the inevitable demise of roe versus wade
61:37 demise of roe versus wade so that of course is of gargantuan
61:41 so that of course is of gargantuan interest to everyone
61:42 interest to everyone um and i i hope you can join us you'll
61:46 um and i i hope you can join us you'll receive
61:47 receive you and other others who
61:50 you and other others who have previously participated in our
61:52 have previously participated in our programs will receive an email
61:54 programs will receive an email invitation
61:55 invitation and um i i hope that you can join us
62:00 and um i i hope that you can join us then so again uh thank you everyone
62:03 then so again uh thank you everyone for participating and i hope to see you
62:06 for participating and i hope to see you again
62:09 again next month on wednesday the first for
62:10 next month on wednesday the first for tom blessner's presentation
62:12 tom blessner's presentation thank you very much thank you dan thank
62:15 thank you very much thank you dan thank you jacob
62:17 you jacob and thank you rosie
62:20 and thank you rosie thank you everyone for joining