0:00 This is why I refer to the left largely
0:02 as a cult. You say the left is a cult. I
0:05 can do the same thing with the right.
0:07 They're completely insane. Look at these
0:09 nutags on Twitter. You'd be wrong.
0:11 Really? Yeah. RFK Jr., former liberal.
0:14 Tulsi Gabbard, former liberal. Donald
0:16 Trump, former liberal. Elon Musk, former
0:18 liberal. Colin Wright, former liberal.
0:19 Tim P, former liberal. How is it that
0:22 the popular vote winner, Donald Trump,
0:24 was a Democrat up until his first term?
0:26 Now the Republican MAGA movement, not
0:28 the neocons, is an eclectic bunch of
0:31 diverse views which debate each other.
0:34 Believe that your your country is
0:36 conquered and it's because of your your
0:38 moral philosophies and ideologies.
0:40 You've got a lot a large influx of
0:41 non-citizens with psychotic violent
0:43 beliefs that are chopping people's heads
0:45 off in the street and you do nothing
0:46 about it. And in fact, your your
0:48 government largely protects, supports,
0:50 and votes for it. In New York,
0:52 non-citizens are given luxury hotels and
0:54 PlayStations. This is a betrayal of the
0:56 American people. All Donald Trump has
0:59 done so far is what the Constitution
1:02 allows. In times of war, a wartime
1:04 president makes difficult decisions
1:06 which are outside what our principles
1:08 purport to be. But we're not in the time
1:09 of war. And it's also as well, Tim. No,
1:12 we're not. Tim, can I just make a point?
1:14 And and this is What's going on
1:16 everybody? Welcome back to the channel.
1:17 Hope all is good wherever you are. In
1:19 this video, we're going to take a look
1:20 at one of the latest trigger nomometry
1:22 podcasts where this got really heated.
1:25 They had Tim P on there and they debated
1:28 towards the later end of the podcast. Is
1:30 Donald Trump a wartime president? And
1:35 Tim Pushed it here in my humble opinion.
1:39 But before we get to that, I want to get
1:41 to a small clip of where he talks about
1:43 the left being a cult and how he
1:45 justifies it because the trigonometry
1:47 guys don't agree with him and he schools
1:50 them here. Let's get to that first. Now
1:52 they live in a world of fear and hatred.
1:54 Pure hatred. And you ask them why do you
1:56 hate Teslas so much. Two years ago you
1:58 told us we had to own one. Now you're
2:00 firebombing them and cheering for it on
2:02 TV. There's no logic behind what they're
2:04 angry about. This is why I refer to the
2:06 left largely as a cult. You have the
2:09 people who are scared to defy it because
2:10 they live in these areas and they know
2:12 someone will shoot at them or smash
2:14 their cars or their windows. So, they
2:15 put stickers on their cars. They put
2:17 signs on their windows, please don't
2:18 hurt me. And then you have people who
2:20 just without thought will hate what
2:23 they're told to hate and not be able to
2:25 explain to you why. But you say the left
2:27 is a cult. Oh, yeah. It's not the whole
2:30 of the left. Let's be fair, Tim. That is
2:32 a very pull percentage of people. I can
2:35 do the same thing with the right and I
2:36 can say, "Look, the right, they're
2:38 completely insane. Look at these nutbags
2:40 on Twitter." Get me wrong. Really? Yeah.
2:44 RFK Jr., former liberal. Tulsi Gabbard,
2:46 former liberal. Donald Trump, former
2:48 liberal. Elon Musk, former liberal.
2:49 Colin Wright, former liberal. Tim P,
2:51 former liberal. How is it that the
2:53 popular vote winner, Donald Trump, was a
2:56 Democrat up until his first term, that
2:58 Tulsi Gabber, DNI, former Democrat, that
3:00 I supported in 2020. I never voted
3:02 Republican. And I didn't like
3:03 Republicans. And now the Republican MAGA
3:06 movement, not the neocons, is an
3:08 eclectic bunch of diverse views which
3:10 debate each other. How is it that
3:12 Charlie Kirk, Christian conservative
3:14 with one of the largest conservative
3:16 platforms, invites moderate pro-choice
3:19 Tim onto his stage for his biggest event
3:22 of the year to discuss those views to
3:25 the public? On the left, what do you
3:27 think would happen if you went and
3:28 opposed their views at a public forum?
3:30 You'd be threatened with violence. And
3:32 I'm and I'm not saying literally
3:33 everyone all the time, but booking
3:36 liberals to come on my show or any other
3:39 show, we people in we have the same
3:41 problem. They refuse to do it. They
3:43 don't want to talk. Back in uh I think
3:44 it was 2018, but and by the way, we
3:47 should say why as well. They're scared
3:49 of their own side. It's a cult. So, so I
3:52 can sit in front of a libertarian like
3:55 Dave Smith who is going to rant about
3:57 how Israel is bad and Charlie Kirk at
3:59 the same time and we leave with beers in
4:01 our hands, smiles on our faces and and
4:04 Dave will say, "Charlie, I really do
4:05 appreciate it. I think you do good work.
4:06 I know we disagree." The left doesn't do
4:08 that. They firebomb your buildings or
4:11 they just don't show up or they try to
4:12 get you fired. They swat you. They
4:14 harass you. It The reason I say it's a
4:16 cult is because you could not define
4:18 what they believe. It's impossible.
4:20 Hassan famously made a video
4:23 responding to me where he said I said
4:26 the military-industrial complex is a bad
4:28 thing. The US imperialism imposing its
4:30 will through financing. He pauses the
4:31 video and he says he's completely right
4:33 on this one. I agreed. And then I said
4:35 this is why I don't think Ukraine is a
4:37 special case. Why the US has given
4:39 Ukraine more money than Israel in 2
4:41 years than Israel got in 50. And then
4:43 Hassan breaks and goes this guy actually
4:45 thinks we shouldn't support Ukraine. Now
4:47 be consistent, buddy. Are you concerned
4:49 about US imperial expansion into foreign
4:51 countries or do or are you simply
4:53 pretending that's the case? You could
4:55 not map the logic of their principles or
4:57 plan for this country is about feelings.
4:59 Yeah, it's I I think it it it is. But if
5:02 you break it down, it's largely about
5:03 adhering to the murmmoration. The left
5:06 swings around randomly in random
5:07 directions. Nobody knows exactly where
5:10 they're turning left or right or up or
5:11 down. They're just trying to make sure
5:13 they stay safely in a position where
5:15 someone else won't bludgeon them with a
5:16 bike lock. So Tesla's a great example.
5:20 Two years ago, Steven Colbear bragged on
5:22 his show he owns a Tesla. Today he's
5:25 making jokes about how it's funny that
5:26 people are firebombing them. Well, that
5:28 don't make sense. You've got you've got
5:30 innocent people. Yeah, but again, you
5:32 could play this game both ways. You
5:33 could say all these people used to say
5:35 Trump is loose cannon and is a crazy and
5:37 whatever. Now they're all in his White
5:39 House. Some of them, but uh but I always
5:41 I always point to tendencies. There is a
5:44 there is a cult on the right that Trump
5:45 can do no wrong. And I've criticized
5:47 these people very heavily. They attacked
5:49 Joe Rogan. And I'm like, "Are you guys
5:50 nuts?" Joe Rogan's a moderate who speaks
5:53 to many different people of all
5:54 persuasions. Let him cook, bro. And they
5:56 attacked me for it. I said, "I don't I
5:58 don't give a shit." I was like, "You
5:59 guys are nuts." While while vocal, they
6:02 don't dictate. They don't control.
6:04 That's true. That is true. On the left,
6:06 you better adhere or else. So I would
6:10 say let's just let's just try and be
6:12 as fair I suppose and say it's two to
6:15 one cult on the left and two to one not
6:18 cult on the right. Maybe 30% of the
6:20 right is culty. 60% of the left is
6:22 culty. So the even the culty elements of
6:25 the right will be forced to entertain
6:27 arguments they do not appreciate or
6:29 like. The left does not. And more
6:32 importantly, even those who are rather
6:34 culty on the right will still try to
6:37 give you a a reason as to why they
6:39 support Trump. The reason why they've
6:41 changed their views. Oh, Donald Trump is
6:43 doing something authoritarian. Well, you
6:45 know, because of this, that, or
6:46 otherwise, I've changed my mind. Yeah, I
6:48 thought he nailed it here. Now, I'm
6:50 going to start playing the clip where
6:51 they talk about Donald Trump being a
6:53 wartime president, and I'm going to stop
6:54 it here and there and give you my
6:55 thoughts in between. Let's go. on the
6:58 left in times of war a wartime president
7:01 makes difficult decisions which are
7:03 outside what our principles purport to
7:05 be but we're not in the time of war and
7:07 it's also as well Tim no we're not Tim
7:10 can I just make a point and and this is
7:12 war right okay we'll come to that in a
7:14 second when you take when the government
7:17 takes away rights it is very difficult
7:20 if not almost impossible for you to get
7:22 them back can we just agree that yes so
7:25 you are willing to give up rights
7:28 in this society for the government to
7:30 then come in and then enact against the
7:34 enemies. When have humans ever not done
7:35 that? Give me one example. One in in
7:39 civilized society. True. In World War
7:42 II, the United States implemented the US
7:44 Office of Censorship and banned people
7:47 from It's interesting that you say this
7:49 because all anti- Ukraine people in
7:50 America keep calling Zilinsky a dictator
7:52 for having martial law which is in line
7:54 with the Ukrainian constitution and not
7:56 having an election like the UK did. He
7:58 declared it and the Constitution says
8:00 that he can declare it and Congress can
8:02 uphold it. There's an argument that it
8:03 can be he can overturn it. Well, but my
8:05 point is but I but I agree in a time of
8:07 war presidents do crazy things. But but
8:09 you are stretching the definition of war
8:12 way beyond its remit. No, I'm not. It's
8:14 called fifth and sixth generational
8:15 warfare. So we have techn technological
8:18 advances in conflict and they alter how
8:20 we perceive what war is. If you go back
8:22 to the earliest days, what is the
8:23 purpose of a conflict? Why do wars
8:25 happen? Sometimes they're silly. You
8:27 don't believe in the same god as me, so
8:29 you must be destroyed. I mean, these are
8:30 largely silly, but they have to do with
8:32 cultural cohesion. So they come from
8:33 somewhere from an evolutionary
8:35 psychological perspective. But uh
8:37 typically it's resource conflict.
8:38 Resource is the principal driver. I do
8:41 think it's absolutely hilarious that the
8:42 East India Trading Company engaged in
8:44 warfare that resulted in the death of
8:45 50,000 people because black pepperc corn
8:47 was a delicacy was a luxury in in in uh
8:49 in Europe in the UK. But uh typically
8:51 it's I don't have enough food or water
8:53 and I will take it and my people will
8:55 not die. I I don't care how I have to
8:56 get it. And it's the same thing you see
8:58 at the root level with a man who uh
9:00 steals bread because his family is
9:02 hungry or whatever. We still frown upon
9:03 it. So the generations of warfare uh
9:06 they evolve. We see the advents of new
9:08 technologies and new methodologies in
9:10 warfare all the time. If the purpose of
9:12 warfare is to secure control of a
9:13 population so you can control its
9:15 resources a tendency for that reason
9:17 sometimes it's you know my god is better
9:20 than your god and your people must
9:21 adhere to my worldview and my beliefs.
9:23 So in the United States we are going
9:25 through uh and this is not my opinion
9:27 this is academics who have assessed what
9:29 warfare is. You get to fourth and fifth
9:31 generational warfare and now sixth um
9:34 which people are going to argue it as we
9:36 we form these ideas in academia six may
9:38 change but fourth and fifth have to do
9:40 with online uh political manipulations
9:43 manipulations of influence technologies
9:46 and use of insurgency. Today it's fair
9:49 to say that uh we are in a kinetic
9:51 conflict. Civil strife began several
9:53 years ago in the United States. Civil
9:55 strife is not civil war, but there are
9:56 many people dying. The one of the
9:58 easiest examples of course is Aaron
9:59 Danielson took two bolts to the chest
10:01 from a far-left Michael Rhinol with a
10:02 communist tattoo on his neck for no
10:04 reason. And now we have the swatting
10:06 swattings of conservatives and the
10:07 firebombings of Tesla facilities for the
10:09 specific goal of destroying a company
10:11 for political reasons for which now
10:13 Tesla stock has gone down partially.
10:14 It's not the only reason. And we've seen
10:16 Tesla evicted from the Vancouver Auto
10:18 Show out of fear of terror attacks. This
10:20 is war. Now, it may not be fullblown hot
10:24 kinetic conflict, but when you have the
10:26 arrest of Donald Trump's lawyers, we are
10:29 dealing with administrative warfare,
10:31 which is a degree of administrative
10:33 conflict, which we don't see in in in
10:35 previous times based on communications
10:37 technologies. If you go back several
10:39 hundred years, how do I secure control
10:41 of a population? I occupy their street
10:42 corners with weapons, and my weapons are
10:44 better than yours. You've got clubs.
10:46 I've got pointy sticks with metal on
10:47 them. Eventually, we have air strikes,
10:50 air raids, howitzers, nuclear artillery,
10:52 and machine guns. I send my guys into
10:54 your country. They stand in the street
10:55 corner. You do as you're told. The
10:56 people are mad about it. They might
10:57 fight back. Today, it's actually really
10:59 easy. I will flood your community with
11:02 information that terrifies you as to
11:03 what is true and what is not. So, you
11:05 are occupied. Notably, we saw the use of
11:08 sock puppets in the Arab Spring, largely
11:10 in Libya, where uh based on a report
11:13 from Project PM, the United States Air
11:15 Force was purchasing from private
11:16 security contractors sock puppet social
11:18 media accounts. One individual would
11:20 operate 50 fake social media accounts to
11:22 create the public perception that the
11:24 overthrowing of Gaddafi was the right
11:25 thing to do. The Americans then
11:27 supported air strikes and the collapse
11:29 of the Libyan government, which I think
11:30 is largely a horrifying thing. Not that
11:32 I much care for Libya, but now you have
11:34 the North African slave trade reigniting
11:36 and militias blowing each other up. Why
11:38 did Americans support it? Because fourth
11:40 generational, fifth generational warfare
11:42 was waged on the American people to make
11:44 them feel like they were under
11:47 occupation figuratively, but in a sense
11:49 literally as well. Why put a man on a
11:52 street corner with a machine gun when
11:54 you can simply inundate them with fake
11:56 accounts to convince them you must do
11:59 this or else? So what we end up with is
12:02 the era of cancel culture and those
12:03 bending the knee quite literally to an
12:05 ideology. Did most people agree with
12:08 intersectional feminism and woke
12:09 ideology? Of course not. It's a
12:10 minority. Why did so many people let it
12:12 happen? Because they feared that there
12:14 was some group that would come after
12:16 them and destroy them. They feared that
12:17 they were under occupation. That the
12:19 institutions are controlled. I will lose
12:21 my job. I will lose my livelihood. My
12:23 bank will will freeze my accounts. My
12:25 social media will remove me from
12:26 society. I have no choice but to live
12:29 this way even though I don't like it.
12:31 That is war. But it's changed. And they
12:33 want you to believe that you're not
12:34 fighting a war. But as the faction of
12:36 bureaucrats and powerful elites who have
12:38 been running these companies have been
12:39 engaging in this war, they've become
12:41 increasingly more desperate as we those
12:43 of us who believe in more enlightenment
12:45 principles and have opposed this have
12:47 started to break through and shift
12:49 dramatically to the point where Donald
12:50 Trump actually was able to win. Now we
12:53 have desperation and desperation begins
12:55 more hot conflict. This is why I believe
12:57 we may be on the back end of this
12:58 conflict. We may be coming off of it.
13:00 But the idea that to go back to, you
13:03 know, a wartime action from a president,
13:05 I'd put it this way. What does that mean
13:07 in today's context? Am I arguing that
13:09 Donald Trump should go round people up
13:10 without charge? Absolutely not. That
13:12 should never happen. Trump made it made
13:13 a he jokingly said, but probably only
13:15 half jokingly, the people who are
13:17 firebombing Teslas, maybe they can spend
13:19 20 years in in an El Salvador in prison,
13:21 which I hear are not so good. Mr.
13:24 President, I do not appreciate you
13:26 entertaining violating the ETH
13:27 amendment. American citizens who commit
13:29 crimes go to American jails and they
13:31 should be treated with dignity and
13:32 respect even if we despise them. So, I
13:34 don't appreciate those jokes. And if it
13:36 comes to that and he actually tries
13:38 sending American citizens to El
13:39 Salvador, I will be opposed in every
13:42 form that I can and it's going to be
13:44 interesting if it gets to that degree.
13:45 That being said, what it comes to an
13:48 actual wartime president is in Trump is
13:51 when Trump issues a legal order,
13:53 executive order saying, "We will not
13:56 have these people in our military. I'm
13:57 the commander-in-chief. He's allowed to
13:59 do it." If a judge tries to stop him in
14:01 this administrative conflict, Donald
14:03 Trump, I believe, is obligated to say,
14:06 "I have heard the ruling from the court.
14:08 Now try and enforce it." Which is a play
14:10 on Andrew Jackson's famous quote when
14:11 the Supreme Court ruled against him. in
14:13 the conflict we are in
14:15 requis this guy wasn't the Supreme Court
14:17 the Supreme There's a whole legal
14:18 process yet to go through which is part
14:20 of the American process now I appreciate
14:22 what you're saying but it it just sounds
14:25 to me like you're redefining wars to
14:27 give yourself more power
14:29 Tim's right you have to stop thinking
14:32 about war as in we have troops on the
14:34 battleground so if for example you look
14:36 at first generational warfare that would
14:39 be massed armies linear battles
14:42 Napoleonic Wars, that type of stuff.
14:45 Second generational warfare, heavy
14:47 firepower. Think World War I, third
14:50 generational warfare. Now you have uh
14:53 maneuver warfare emphasizing speed,
14:55 emphasizing disruption. Think about like
14:57 Blitzkr, World War II. Fourth
15:00 generational warfare starts to get a lot
15:01 more interesting. This is nonlinear
15:04 conflict, leveraging networks and ideas
15:06 and a lot of brute force. Force
15:09 generational, which you're going to hear
15:10 Tim talk about a lot, is a concept that
15:12 describes a conflict that kind of blurs
15:14 the line between war and politics,
15:17 between combatant and civilian. Think
15:20 about some of the wars in the Middle
15:21 East. This is a term that they started
15:23 to use in the mid 80s. William S. Lynn
15:27 started to use it describing like
15:29 decentralized non-traditional conflicts
15:31 where non-state actors meaning like
15:34 insurgents and
15:36 terrorists challenge state powers using
15:39 asymatic tactics. So think about long
15:42 time frame conflict that can span years
15:44 that can span decades insurgent cells
15:47 hackers decentralized actors that type
15:50 of stuff. When we start talking about
15:52 the more modern warfare, you're going to
15:55 hear Tim talk a lot in this podcast
15:57 about fifth generation and sixth
15:59 generation warfare. Fifth generation
16:02 warfare focuses on manipulation of
16:03 information and perception. Most of the
16:05 time this will target the civilian
16:08 population, societal cohesion. It's
16:11 about winning without fighting directly.
16:13 I'll give you some examples of that. But
16:14 now just talking about you can see how
16:16 Donald Trump his presidency would fit
16:18 into this. Now, sixth generational
16:20 warfare, a lot more speculative, often
16:23 tied to advanced military technology,
16:25 precision strikes, very minimal, if any,
16:28 engagement of troops. It's less about
16:31 societal manipulation like fifth
16:32 generational warfare is, and a lot more
16:34 about overwhelming capabilities. Now,
16:36 fifth generational warfare, and you hear
16:38 him say non-kinetic, that's what that
16:41 is. Fifth generational warfare is
16:42 characterized as non-kinetic
16:44 information-driven operations aimed at
16:47 manipulating perception.
16:49 And achieving strategic goals without
16:52 traditional military engagement involves
16:54 tactics like social engineering,
16:56 misinformation, cyber attacks,
16:57 psychological operations, and the use of
17:00 emerging technologies like AI would be a
17:02 big one. There's a guy by the name of
17:05 Daniel Abbott and he refers to this as
17:07 war of information and perception which
17:09 is what fifth generational warfare to
17:11 him is. So when you make the case that
17:14 is Donald Trump a wartime president?
17:17 Well, Trump's presidency, particularly
17:19 in his second term, aligns with the
17:21 demands of fifth and sixth generational
17:23 warfare due to his unconventional
17:26 leadership for one. And he focuses a lot
17:29 on narrative control, economic
17:31 strategies, technological investments,
17:34 the way he plays tariffs. He wants to
17:36 control the Suez Canal, all the channels
17:38 for trade.
17:40 This is a wartime president. Countering
17:43 misinformation, psychological
17:44 operations, social media, direct
17:46 communications, that type of stuff is
17:49 fifth and sixth generational warfare. As
17:51 a wartime president, like Tim says,
17:53 Trump's ability to shape narratives and
17:56 maintain a loyal base in a polarized
17:58 information environment like we have
18:00 today is exactly why he is that. Look at
18:04 the trade war with China. The sanctions
18:06 on rogue states. All that stuff is fifth
18:10 and sixth generational warfare. What we
18:12 have going on in the country right now
18:14 that Tim Pool's talking about, this is
18:15 happening. And see how I'm quite
18:17 disappointed in this interview with the
18:19 trigonometry guys to be honest. But
18:21 let's get back to it. I just wanted to
18:22 tell you a little bit more about fourth,
18:24 fifth, sixth generational warfare in
18:27 case you weren't familiar with it. Let's
18:28 get back to it. which is what every
18:30 dictator has always done in history,
18:31 which is to say the situation's so bad,
18:35 I need extra power. Abraham Lincoln a
18:36 dictator. Well, look, yes or no. We are
18:40 not in a war situation. Is Abraham
18:41 Lincoln a dictator? We are not in a war
18:43 situation. Was Abraham Lincoln a
18:45 dictator? We are not in a war situation.
18:47 I'm I'm okay. You are right. I'll just
18:49 say you're right. Okay. Now, is Abraham
18:51 Lincoln a dictator? So, look, this
18:54 Tim the theoretical examples you give,
18:56 it's not a theoretic. It's American
18:57 history. fine but it's not related to
18:59 the current moment which is what we're
19:00 talking about. So in the in the
19:03 cont lay out the argument that you made
19:05 if I represent it incorrectly you tell
19:07 me this the core of your argument that
19:09 you're making right is that because we
19:11 are in a fourth fifth sixth generational
19:14 warfare situation a different set of
19:16 rules ought to apply it's a wartime
19:19 therefore just like you can apply
19:20 martial law just like you can suspend
19:22 this or this or that or whatever right
19:24 and and the point I'm making to you is
19:26 this is the argument that every dictator
19:28 in history has made now I don't know
19:30 American history as well as you and
19:32 maybe uh you the point that you make
19:34 about Abraham Lincoln is relevant in
19:36 some way but what I'm saying to you is
19:38 something completely different which is
19:39 we're not in a war let me ask you a
19:42 question
19:43 uh was Abraham Lincoln a dictator yes or
19:46 no I don't know you don't uh if a leader
19:49 suspended the right to due process for
19:52 all peoples is that is that a
19:54 dictatorial move it depends on the
19:55 context so like right now if Trump said
19:57 I'm suspending the constitutional rights
19:59 and due process for far-left terrorists
20:01 Uh, look, I'm not a legal scholar. That
20:03 see that that seems pretty extreme to
20:05 me. Yeah. What if Donald Trump decided
20:07 he was going to arrest the Washington
20:09 half of the Washington state body
20:11 because they were voting in favor of uh
20:14 groups that were attacking Tesla
20:16 facilities? What does that mean voting
20:17 in favor of? So in in let let's say in
20:20 their uh uh uh state body someone
20:23 proposes a bill that they will not
20:24 arrest nor provide any assistance to any
20:27 individual any individual in their state
20:29 who's caught firebombing Tesla
20:31 facilities or other right aligned
20:33 institutions. The state will not enforce
20:35 the law against them nor will they aid
20:37 federal law enforcement. Yeah. I don't
20:38 know what the answer to that question is
20:40 legally. But my point to you is so so
20:42 like this is the problem. If you don't
20:44 know and you have no thoughts on the
20:45 matter then I don't know what we're
20:46 arguing. You can simply say Tim may be
20:48 right. I don't know. Uh, no, that's not
20:50 what I'm saying. I'm taking the argument
20:52 that you're making and interrogating it
20:54 as I do with every other guest on the
20:56 So, so what I'm saying to you is you've
20:58 made the claim that we are in the war in
21:01 order to be able to justify suspending
21:03 the rules applying equally to everybody.
21:05 That's basically what you've done,
21:06 right? When I look outside to the
21:09 confict, when I look outside, I don't
21:11 see a war that justifies that. When you
21:14 look outside in a largely liberal
21:15 jurisdiction where everyone agrees with
21:16 each other, you don't see anything
21:17 justifying. We've we've traveled around
21:20 the United States plenty and uh I have
21:23 never seen anything that justifies
21:24 instituting martial law in this country.
21:26 Fire bombing of Tesla facilities, the
21:28 shooting them up, the murder and killing
21:29 of people for political purposes.
21:33 So, uh first, uh you are incorrect. I'm
21:36 not arguing that, uh the conflict we are
21:40 right now warrants anything close to
21:41 what Abraham Lincoln did. Okay. Well,
21:43 you kept bringing him up. That's why I
21:44 made that assumption because I'm trying
21:45 to understand what your philosophical
21:47 and moral uh view is of a president who
21:49 does such things at a time. And and what
21:51 I am saying to you is you can't compare
21:52 a context of a civil war with I'm asking
21:56 you right now. Yeah. Based on the
21:57 American Civil War and what was going on
21:59 was Abraham Lincoln a dictator for
22:01 suspending habius corpus and arresting
22:03 politicians which is sidest stepping my
22:05 point which is right now I don't think
22:07 you can answer the question. I already
22:08 did answer the question. You're you're
22:10 ignoring the question. I answered the
22:11 question by saying you know more about
22:12 it than me. Uhhuh. You remember that? So
22:14 do you want to say I don't know? I
22:16 already said that. So you're not sure.
22:18 I've already said that. But what I'm
22:19 saying is the example you're bringing up
22:20 is not relevant to the current
22:22 situation. Should should Donald Trump
22:24 invoke the insurrection act and send uh
22:26 US Army into California, Oregon, and
22:29 Washington to start hunting down and
22:31 arresting the terrorist cells that are
22:32 organizing these attacks? Uh no. I think
22:35 the law enforcement can take care of
22:37 that. They're being they're not doing
22:38 it. What do you mean they're not doing
22:39 it? Well, I mean, we've had uh uh
22:42 far-left uh terroristic cells operating
22:44 with impunity in many of these
22:45 jurisdictions. So, let's take a take a
22:47 look at uh uh you know uh the CHAZ chop
22:49 for instance. I mean, we know those
22:51 people are they're not in jail. Should
22:52 Trump go and arrest them? Statute of
22:54 limitations not expired on those. I
22:55 don't know how the American legal system
22:56 works enough to answer that question,
22:57 but should those people be arrested?
22:59 Absolutely. Okay. If the state law
23:01 enforcement refuses to do so, should
23:02 Trump invoke the Insurrection Act and go
23:04 do it? I don't know enough about the
23:05 Insurrection Act. The insurrection act
23:07 is when Donald Trump can use National
23:10 Guard or Army to enforce I believe
23:12 National Guard uh to enforce laws if the
23:14 local jurisdictions refuse to do so.
23:16 Well, on that definition, it seems like
23:18 you should. That's literally the
23:19 instruction. Well, if that's if that's
23:21 the definition, if the local law
23:22 enforcement refuses to enforce the law,
23:24 then that sounds right. But see, you
23:26 keep throwing out these hypothetical
23:28 examples, which I I understand. From my
23:31 point of view, what I'm saying to you is
23:32 just taking the logic of your argument.
23:34 I'm not arguing about these specific
23:35 details. You're saying we're in war,
23:38 therefore we should suspend the rules
23:40 applying. No, I'm not saying that. Well,
23:42 that is what you said. I I think you're
23:44 misunderstanding what perhaps you're
23:47 misunderstanding wartime and you're
23:49 you're believing that wartime means men
23:51 are on a battlefield shooting at each
23:52 other. Okay. But that's exactly what I'm
23:54 saying. You're saying wartime means
23:56 people are spreading propaganda on
23:57 social media. Therefore, if I if whoever
24:00 I like is in charge, they've got to be
24:02 able to act in a way that currently
24:03 isn't compliant with the law. So, and
24:06 I'm saying every civilization people
24:08 spreading propaganda on social media.
24:10 Just I believe that your your country is
24:13 conquered and it's because of your your
24:15 moral philosophies and ideologies. They
24:17 are weak and they allow to be destroyed.
24:19 What do you mean by conquered? Yeah.
24:20 Well, I mean you've got a lot a large
24:22 influx of non-citizens with psychotic
24:24 violent beliefs that are chopping
24:26 people's heads off in the street. you're
24:27 not allowed to talk about it, you know,
24:29 without going to jail. You've got gangs
24:31 that have been operating for decades. I
24:33 look I look at the UK and it's like
24:34 you've got a you got a you've got a
24:36 political body threatening to to uh
24:38 extradite American citizens for us
24:40 expressing our opinions on our own
24:41 country. You can't have screwdrivers in
24:43 public. The things that your country has
24:45 done to its citizenry is shockingly
24:47 insane to an American. And it's it's
24:49 it's absurd that you have such a massive
24:51 influx of a disperate ideology coming
24:54 into your country and imposing its will
24:56 on you and you do nothing about it and
24:58 in fact your your government largely
25:00 protects supports and votes for it. I
25:02 mean that's insane. I hold slow down. So
25:06 first of all uh there are lots of us who
25:09 don't agree with what's happening and
25:10 say so. What are you doing about it? Let
25:12 me just answer your question. So there
25:14 are lots of us who disagree and uh are
25:17 voicing our opinions about it. Uh the I
25:20 am as concerned as you are about the
25:21 fact that some people are uh visited by
25:24 the police. I'm one of the most
25:26 outspoken people in the UK about that.
25:28 That's not to say that you can't express
25:30 disagreement with what's happening and
25:32 you will instantly go to prison. um
25:35 instantly but uh a lot a lot of people I
25:38 mean people at was it speaker corner or
25:40 whatever I'm not as familiar with the
25:42 name of the location getting arrested
25:44 people getting arrested for speech is
25:46 something that shouldn't be happening a
25:47 woman who is standing outside of an
25:48 abortion clinic with her eyes closed
25:49 getting arrested what's your point I've
25:51 already said that there are lots of us
25:52 who disagree what are you doing to stop
25:54 that well there is a very large
25:55 political movement that's organizing in
25:57 exactly the same way that there's a
25:58 political movement in this country
25:59 against the right how did it get to that
26:00 point in your country overreach of the
26:02 left uh it got to the point because
26:04 there are lots and lots of people who
26:05 believe uh a lot of this progressive
26:09 ideology in our country. Do do you think
26:11 that at a certain point violence will
26:12 break out between two different factions
26:13 in your country? Well, we've already had
26:15 it and I I think it's credible that that
26:18 could continue to be the case as these
26:20 tensions brew. Absolutely. So, what it
26:21 what it means to be a wartime president,
26:23 the point I'm making is that Trump used
26:25 commeurate actions against those who
26:26 engaged the actions against him. Okay.
26:28 What what I'm saying is
26:30 um Karma in our country during the riots
26:34 could do the exact thing that you're
26:35 demanding. He could say, "Well, look,
26:36 these people are rioting. They're
26:38 attacking the police. I need special
26:40 powers to put these people in prison for
26:42 tweets." That's the logic of your
26:43 argument. Every country ever has done
26:46 this. And the view that you take is
26:49 dictators do this. Abraham Lincoln
26:50 wasn't a dictator. Abraham Lincoln was a
26:52 president who saw actions that were
26:54 sedicious and he he took econ there
26:57 there was one man who thought Abraham
26:58 Lincoln was addicted. So Karma should be
27:00 able to put riers in prison prison for
27:01 tweets then on on your logic. Why why
27:03 would I agree with your moral worldview?
27:06 But you're saying I'm on the I'm on the
27:07 other side of that. Oh I see. So if a
27:09 right-wing Karma is in power then he's
27:11 allowed to put people in prison for
27:12 tweets. I didn't say people should go to
27:15 prison for tweets ever. No, but I asked
27:17 I said wartime
27:18 presidency riots that are being promoted
27:21 on social media. So wait, you're saying
27:23 that if an individual promotes riots on
27:27 social media, they should go to jail.
27:28 No, that's what you're saying. They
27:30 should. Yes. Right. Okay. But only if
27:32 the person in charge is rightwing. If
27:34 the person in charge is left, right? So
27:37 I don't think your government should
27:38 arrest people for posting their opinions
27:40 on social media. Okay. If a person goes
27:42 online and says, "Everyone meet up at
27:43 this place. We're going to burn it all
27:44 down. Here's the address." you lock them
27:46 up. Well, I say that lock them up
27:47 irrespective of who's in power and what
27:49 their opinions are. Whereas, what do we
27:51 disagree on? I think what we're
27:53 disagreeing on is you believe that if
27:55 the situation's bad enough, a guy that
27:57 you agree with politically should come
27:59 in and suspend the rules by which we
28:01 play the game of Give me any country
28:03 ever where that's not been the case. I I
28:05 don't understand what your point is.
28:07 Name any point in history when an
28:10 executive in authority facing an
28:11 emergency decided not to engage. Oh, I I
28:14 don't disagree with that. What I'm
28:15 disagreeing with you is, do you think
28:16 that your country survives the conflict?
28:19 Tim, you got to let me finish my
28:20 argument before you disagree with it.
28:22 What I'm saying is you're extending the
28:25 definition of war, wartime, and
28:28 emergency in order to suit your agenda
28:30 is what it sounds like. You are
28:32 incorrect. Okay. Why am I incorrect?
28:33 Because I've already described fourth
28:35 and fifth generational warfare academic
28:37 terms that describe a state of conflict
28:38 in which a faction of people is trying
28:40 to take power from That's what we
28:42 disagree about, right? What I see, it's
28:44 not an issue of disagreement. I'm giving
28:46 you an academic statement as to which
28:48 I'm entitled to disagree with. Right.
28:50 When I travel around, whether it's
28:52 Europe or the UK or America, I don't see
28:55 a state of conflict. You're just
28:56 disagreeing with the definition. Yes.
28:58 Exactly. So, uh, let's using for me it's
29:01 the easiest to use the American Civil
29:02 War because it's what is attached to our
29:04 history. Do you think in 1861 in
29:07 September in Atlanta people walked
29:09 outside and were fighting each other?
29:11 Uh, look, I this this the American Civil
29:13 War is clear in expertise for you, which
29:15 it isn't for me. I'm talking about what
29:17 I see out here. So, let me try and
29:19 explain to you what I'm what I'm saying.
29:20 Sure. Who are the belligerents in the
29:23 American Civil War? Are you familiar?
29:26 Tim, did you hear what I just said? This
29:28 is why I I'm asking you a question. You
29:29 So, what you're doing I'm genuinely
29:30 trying to know if you know something so
29:32 I can explain it to you. And I just said
29:33 it's an air of expertise for you, which
29:35 it isn't for me. So, I I I assume most
29:37 people know who the belligerents were in
29:39 the American Civil War. It was the North
29:40 and the South. Yes, you are aware of
29:42 that. Yes. Okay. I was not trying to get
29:45 you. Okay. I need to know if you know
29:46 this because if you don't, I would tell
29:48 you it's the North and the South. Okay.
29:49 Great. The Confederacy and the Union.
29:51 Okay. No one in the Confederacy walked
29:54 outside and saw a conflict. No one in
29:56 the Union walked outside and saw a
29:58 conflict. The front line was Gettysburg.
30:00 Now I know a lot of you are not from the
30:02 US or so you're probably
30:04 not familiar as much with Abraham
30:06 Lincoln maybe like the German
30:08 trigonometry guys here Abraham Lincoln
30:11 operated fully within his constitutional
30:13 bounds even in crisis when he suspended
30:16 habis corpus he was fully allowed to do
30:19 that this is where his critics will
30:20 often call him a dictator however the
30:23 constitution article 1 section 9 allows
30:26 suspension of heba's corpus in case of
30:29 rebellions or invasion or in this case a
30:32 civil war which was clearly the case and
30:35 Lincoln himself justified it in 1861 as
30:37 a temporary measure. Keep in mind
30:39 temporary to prevent Confederate
30:42 sympathizers in border states. An
30:45 example of that will be proconfederate
30:48 militias who threaten railroads critical
30:51 to Washington DC's defense type of
30:52 thing. Unlike a dictator, Lincoln sought
30:56 judicial and legislative oversight to do
30:58 all of these things. He defended his
31:00 actions publicly and invited scrutiny.
31:04 Lincoln was not a dictator and his
31:06 actions they were driven by necessity
31:09 and not by ambition for power and they
31:12 were constrained by the constitution
31:14 constitutional principle and democratic
31:16 processes and he had public
31:18 accountability. He preserved election.
31:20 He didn't attempt to run for more terms
31:22 after he bowed out. He tolerated
31:25 disscent. He tried to justify every
31:28 measure that he took. He sought to
31:29 restore normaly and not to perpetuate
31:33 power. His leadership during the civil
31:36 war, sure was it bold? Absolutely. But
31:39 we were in times of war. This was aimed
31:42 to save the union and abolish slavery,
31:46 not to abolish
31:47 autocracy. Compared to what a lot of
31:49 people will tell you that he was a
31:50 dictator. true dictators who seek to
31:54 have permanent control and suppress all
31:56 opposition. Lincoln's record reflects a
31:59 democratic leader navigating a crisis
32:02 with restraint and a commitment to the
32:05 nation's founding ideas. There was no
32:08 lasting autocracy. If Lincoln were a
32:10 dictator, his presidency would have left
32:12 a framework for centralized power.
32:15 Instead, power reverted back to pre-war
32:18 norms after his death. The
32:20 reconstruction, while contentious, I
32:23 guess you could say, was driven by
32:25 Congress, not a Lincoln installed
32:28 regime. The Union was preserved. Slavery
32:31 was abolished, disaligned with Lincoln
32:32 state goals, not personal enrichments or
32:37 domination or power. If you're trying to
32:40 compare the guys to say Mussolini who
32:42 cultivated cults of personality and
32:44 demanded loyalty and he was there for
32:47 power, Lincoln, if you read up on the
32:49 guy, he had self-deprecating humor. He
32:51 had an openness to criticism. The guy
32:54 was as far from a dictator as possible.
32:57 Let's get back to it. Yes, but that
32:58 doesn't prove that America is in a civil
33:00 war now. There are lots of times when
33:02 people walked outside and did I didn't
33:04 say we are in a civil war. I said we are
33:06 in a fourth and fifth generation of
33:07 warfare. You didn't say we're in a civil
33:09 war. I said I don't. Yes. So, let's go
33:12 back in time. I said I don't know if
33:14 what happens now turns into a civil war.
33:15 Right. Right. Right. I actually think
33:17 it's probably less than 50%. Yes. I
33:19 think we may be on the back end of
33:21 whatever this conflict is. Okay. Fourth
33:23 and fifth generational warfare does not
33:25 mean a country is in a state of active
33:27 war and wartime presidential powers.
33:29 This is why I tried saying several
33:30 minutes ago. I don't think you
33:31 understand what wartime presidential
33:33 powers is reference to. Okay, maybe not.
33:35 It is the use of comate force against a
33:37 force exerting power at you first. That
33:40 is when administrative powers in New
33:43 York, Wisconsin, and Georgia begin
33:46 arresting Trump's lawyers, which defies
33:48 the Constitution and is outside of the
33:51 legal code of the United States. Right?
33:53 That is
33:54 dictatorial. Trump's response cannot be,
33:57 "I guess I have to let him happen." It
33:59 must be, "I must stop them from doing
34:02 this. It is a violation of the
34:04 constitution. Right? Okay. If there are
34:08 two factions and one is violating the
34:10 law, we should stop them. Agreed. What
34:13 we are dealing with over the past four
34:14 years is forces aligned with what we
34:16 would call the Democratic party, the
34:17 liberals, whatever you want to say, the
34:18 bureaucratic state, the deep state have
34:20 violated the constitution in numerous
34:22 ways. This is what I refer to as fourth
34:25 and fifth and sixth generational
34:26 warfare.
34:28 It warfare doesn't kinetic conflict.
34:30 Okay. So, what So, okay. Now I
34:32 understand the argument perhaps we we
34:33 were talking across purposes. So what
34:35 you're saying is what they've done over
34:37 the last four years is unconstitutional
34:39 and wrong and therefore it justifies
34:41 what Trump using commensurate forces to
34:44 stop. What's commensurate forces? The
34:46 insurrection act mean and what would
34:49 that again Donald Trump can call upon
34:51 the National Guard to go into
34:52 California, Portland, and Oregon and
34:53 arrest Antifa. The states aren't doing
34:56 it right. He can have the feds start
34:58 doing it which they've done a little
34:59 bit. if the states refuse to enforce or
35:02 immigration law for instance and I think
35:03 immigration law is another point of uh
35:05 advanced warfare. Trump should invoke
35:07 the insurrection act to utilize the the
35:09 the powers he has to the greatest degree
35:11 to start enforcing a law that is not
35:13 being done locally as he is allowed
35:14 under the presidency. If if I were to
35:17 say Trump should go arrest a uh an
35:20 attorney's uh the attorneys general from
35:21 three states, would that be dictatorial?
35:24 I don't know enough about it. The
35:25 attorneys general of the head of law
35:26 enforcement for each state. Yeah, I
35:28 know. I know what an attorney general
35:29 is, but I don't know what the context
35:31 would be in American. You look, you're
35:33 much better versed. My job is just to
35:35 ask you to try and understand what
35:36 you're saying. My point is that if
35:38 Donald Trump were to do so, he'd be
35:39 called a dictator for arresting top
35:41 political uh politicians in these
35:43 states. Yeah. But in three states, the
35:45 attorneys general have violated the
35:46 Constitution and targeted innocent
35:49 individuals in ways that is shocking to
35:51 the American psyche. However, largely on
35:53 the Democrat side, they're in favor of
35:55 it regardless. These are people who
35:56 clapped and cheered when Jordan Clapper
35:59 on the Daily Showed images of terror
36:01 attacks. He he literally called them
36:03 acts of domestic terror and they clapped
36:05 and cheered for it. Yeah. Are we
36:06 supposed to just say Trump should carry
36:09 on as normal? No. Trump's going to have
36:12 to use what we would describe as wartime
36:15 president. Again, let's let's clarify
36:17 these points. There are various forms of
36:19 warfare. There's psychological warfare.
36:21 Warfare can be waged without a
36:23 declaration of war. civil uh warfare can
36:25 happen without there being an active
36:27 civil conflict or extended conflict
36:29 conflict. You can get limited warfare.
36:31 Uh that's what Kissinger referred to. Um
36:34 and what we're dealing with right now is
36:36 fourth and fifth and entering a new
36:38 generation of warfare, which what people
36:39 would argue is sixth. Fourth
36:41 generational warfare is insurgency.
36:43 That's what we've been seeing with
36:44 Antifa and the far left. The purpose of
36:46 fourth generational warfare is to make
36:48 you scared to live a certain way.
36:50 Vancouver cancelled uh uh evicted Tesla
36:53 from the auto show out of fear of
36:55 firebombs and shootings. That's the
36:57 purpose of fourth generational warfare.
37:00 Should Donald Trump simply say we do
37:02 nothing? Now, to be fair, that's Canada.
37:04 But I'm saying in the United States
37:05 where Tesla chargers and dealerships
37:07 have been vandalized, shot up and the
37:08 only question for me like I think the
37:10 only thing that uh we might be
37:12 disagreeing about is one thing and one
37:14 thing only, which is um let's say that
37:17 Donald Trump and his team and his people
37:20 for the next four years do a reverse of
37:23 what the left has been doing based on
37:25 your description, which is they violate
37:26 the constitution, they failed to enforce
37:28 it in some areas, etc. Would you then be
37:30 happy for whoever is the Democrat
37:33 president after that to do the things
37:35 that you are now advocating that
37:37 President Trump does? That's the only
37:38 question. I think that is a naive
37:41 question because that doesn't entertain
37:43 the realities of history and everything
37:44 that's ever happened. I would be unhappy
37:47 with literally any amoral degenerate
37:50 enforcing whatever laws that support
37:52 amoral degeneracy. It doesn't matter.
37:54 No, I'm talking about the constitution.
37:56 So here's the issue. If if the right
37:59 violin morals versus principles first.
38:01 Yeah. If I said we must uphold the right
38:05 of parents to make medical decisions for
38:07 their children, that is a power I have
38:09 granted to Donald Trump to stop the
38:11 mutilation of children. Yes, these these
38:14 school districts and these doctors that
38:16 are taking kids away from their parents
38:18 because the the kids think they're trans
38:20 and they're being groomed online. We
38:22 must stop this. However, that same
38:24 principle empowers Democrats to take the
38:27 children away from parents who are
38:28 protecting their kids from generations.
38:30 Sounds like a no to me. You wouldn't
38:32 support a Democrat president enforcing
38:34 the Constitution in the way that you
38:35 want Donald Trump to do. The reason why
38:37 I answered the way I did is not to avoid
38:39 the question, but to point out that the
38:41 average person would not understand what
38:42 yes or no means morally if if I were to
38:46 give a simplistic answer. Well, look,
38:48 the the the point you're making is the
38:50 left has violated the Constitution. And
38:52 therefore, Donald Trump needs to invoke
38:53 the Insurrection Act in order to That's
38:56 let me slow down. Let me slow down
38:57 there. My argument is an administrative
39:00 war has begun as of 2015 when they
39:05 accused Donald Trump of being a Russian
39:06 spy. They accused the front runner for
39:08 the Republican party of being a traitor
39:10 to his nation for which the penalty is
39:11 death. Sought to impeach and imprison
39:14 him and obstructed an entire
39:16 presidential administration. They
39:17 arrested several people in his sphere
39:19 who did nothing wrong. They destroyed
39:20 the lives of people like Carter Page and
39:22 Michael Flynn who did nothing wrong.
39:25 This is I'm sorry, but for everything
39:28 they accuse Trump of doing, they
39:29 started. Trump's response can't be we
39:33 don't arrest politicians. It's not what
39:34 we do in America. No, it's they've
39:36 already been doing that. We need
39:38 investigations of Adam Schiff, the J6
39:41 committee. We need investigations of
39:42 Leticia James. We need uh the of
39:45 Wisconsin and and uh Atlanta who
39:48 arrested lawyers. Both of these states
39:50 arrested lawyers. Well, if anyone's
39:51 broken the law, of course they should be
39:52 investigated. But I'm asking you a very
39:54 different question. And I think it
39:56 speaks to the core of our disagreement,
39:58 which is the the question is, do you
40:01 want the constitution to be enforced
40:03 irrespective of who's in power? Do you
40:05 not? And it's really as simple as that,
40:06 right? No. Because this is why I started
40:10 the conversation with the discussion of
40:11 morals versus principles. No, I
40:12 understand that the idea. So when I
40:14 explained to you when I asked you what
40:15 free speech meant, yes, the Constitution
40:17 does not and never did protect free
40:19 speech. Now the structure of the
40:21 Constitution outside of the Bill of
40:22 Rights I largely respect, which lays out
40:23 the three branches of governments, the
40:24 powers they have, and I agree with. I
40:26 don't want that to be dismantled.
40:28 However, at the advent of the Bill of
40:30 Rights, you couldn't blaspheme or swear
40:32 in public. In fact, you couldn't swear
40:34 in public in the 1970s. Free speech was
40:36 never protected. The question you're
40:37 asking me is, do I want my moral
40:40 worldview of today to be protected and
40:42 upheld? And would I be upset if another
40:44 person came in and tried to destroy it?
40:45 But that happens all the time no matter
40:47 what. So it's not a question of if I say
40:50 Donald Trump, please protect my moral
40:52 worldview, would I be upset if someone
40:54 who opposed my worldview got in? Well,
40:55 of course I would. I was upset when Joe
40:57 Biden won the election and opposed my
40:58 moral worldview. The question is the
41:00 degrees of power which we are using to
41:02 use to preserve our our world. The
41:04 Democrats for a long period of time have
41:06 been destroying this country. And it's
41:08 and it wasn't always the Democrats. The
41:09 Republicans were on board until Trump
41:11 came in. The MAGA movement and the
41:13 populist movements of the left and the
41:14 right, which have some overlap largely
41:17 diverged from what we had in our
41:18 two-party system. When the borders were
41:20 opened up and you had industrialists
41:22 allowing millions of non-citizens to
41:24 come into this country for the purpose
41:25 of GDP growth to adhere to some ridic
41:28 ridiculous modern monetary theory, the
41:30 country was being destroyed. We opposed
41:32 this. What did we do? We used comasurate
41:34 power as was used against us. And what
41:36 was that? Protests, conversations,
41:38 podcasts, and elections. M then we got
41:41 Donald Trump being accused of being a
41:42 spy. They tried to destroy his life.
41:44 There has been no comasate response on
41:46 the right. Donald Trump then lost an
41:48 election based on one largely many of
41:51 his own failings and an inability to
41:53 understand the laws that were being
41:54 implemented. The Democrats in several
41:56 states violated the Constitution by
41:58 allowing judges and executives to
42:00 overrule state legislatores elections
42:02 which violates I believe article one of
42:04 the sec of the constitution which states
42:06 that elections shall be determined by
42:07 the legislatures not judges or
42:09 executives. When Texas petitioned the
42:11 Supreme Court in Texas v. Pennsylvania
42:13 in 2020 to overrule these states that
42:16 were in violation of the Constitution
42:18 the Supreme Court said we will not hear
42:20 it. Why? The Supreme Court is largely
42:22 afraid that if it becomes exposed
42:25 culturally, they have no enforcement
42:26 mechanism, the country falls apart. The
42:28 best thing they can do in questions of
42:30 this intensity is to stay out of them,
42:33 which they've continually done, proving
42:35 the Supreme Court to be largely
42:36 impotent. There has still not been
42:39 comate action from the right as to what
42:41 the left has been doing. the flooding of
42:43 this country with I'm going to give the
42:44 low estimate of 10 million non-citizens
42:47 given preferred access, given protected
42:49 status, or given money in places like
42:51 New York. This erodess the foundation of
42:53 what our ancestors built for us and what
42:55 we we intended to pass down to our
42:56 children. Gen Z can't afford houses. As
42:59 you already stated, the American dream
43:00 is dead for them. Yet in New York,
43:01 non-citizens are given luxury hotels and
43:03 PlayStations. This is a betrayal of the
43:06 American people. All Donald Trump has
43:08 done so far is what the Constitution
43:12 allows. And he's 100% right about that
43:15 Trump's a wartime criminal. Again, I
43:16 talked about it. Fifth and sixth
43:18 generational warfare. Just like he
43:19 mentioned, the establishment and the
43:21 institutions which have been run in this
43:23 country by the deep states for the
43:25 longest time by the uni party for what
43:27 over 30 25 30 years you would say. They
43:31 violated the constitution in every way
43:34 imaginable, especially over the past 10
43:36 years to which the right has not
43:38 responded in commensurate force. Like I
43:41 don't want a president who is going to
43:43 violate the constitution. I don't want
43:46 anyone to do so, but it's been done.
43:50 Some would argue it's been done by many
43:52 a presidents throughout history. The
43:55 issue now is that it actually threatens
43:58 the fabric of our democracy. what the
44:00 Democrats have done over the last
44:02 decade. And I think it's time, and I
44:04 think this is what Tim was saying, it's
44:06 time for Donald Trump and his
44:08 administration to begin to enforce laws
44:11 against these political forces and these
44:13 political actors, these attorney
44:15 generals, these judges that are
44:18 violating our constitution. I was quite
44:21 disappointed in Constantine, both the
44:23 trigonometry guys in this video. To
44:25 disagree that the Tesla bombings were
44:27 not an act of political violence is
44:30 absurd. Now, there's a big challenge
44:32 when you start referring to Donald Trump
44:34 as a wartime president. If he were to
44:36 arrest these attorney generals, for
44:38 example, for violating the law, if you
44:40 go after politicians, if you go after
44:42 these Democratic personalities, which I
44:44 think this is why we've not seen anybody
44:46 go after Hillary for what she
44:49 did, all these Democrats, right, that
44:51 prosecuted Trump, that had these
44:53 criminal conspiracies, the Russia Russia
44:55 hoax, Adam Schiff, the J6 committee.
45:00 Once you start doing that, the question
45:03 is like where's the offramp? How do you
45:05 how do you bring it back after that? And
45:07 I think this is a big a big reason why
45:09 we've not seen it. And we're at a point
45:11 now where a lot of these factions on the
45:14 left are losing power, have lost a lot
45:15 of power. I'm not saying I'm not saying
45:17 there's not there anymore, but but you
45:19 want to try to stay away from doing that
45:21 as much as you can. That's one of the
45:24 big reasons I think there might be more
45:26 where you you hear about Cash Patel for
45:28 years. He's been telling us about the
45:29 criminals in the FBI. He wrote a whole
45:31 book called Government Gangsters. Great
45:33 book. I recommend you read it. and him
45:34 and Bonino, I think, are going to go
45:36 after some people in there, but you're
45:38 not going to see as many as I think you
45:39 would because I think they don't want to
45:41 set that precedent because where do you
45:43 stop after that? Anyways, great podcast.
45:45 I don't want to get too in the weeds
45:47 about that. Let me know what you think
45:48 in the video, if I made any mistakes in
45:50 my commentary, what parts you like, what
45:52 parts you didn't like. I do read the
45:53 comments. I don't answer all of them
45:55 because as a channel grows, it becomes
45:56 hard. But unlike a lot of these
45:59 channels, I read them. I don't monitor
46:01 my comment section. You're free to
46:04 comment any way you want. Hope you
46:05 enjoyed the video. If you did, smash
46:06 that thumbs up button for your boy.
46:07 Consider subscribing to the channel.
46:08 Help it grow. I'll catch you in the next
46:09 one. Peace out, everybody.
Chrome Extension