Hang tight while we fetch the video data and transcripts. This only takes a moment.
Connecting to YouTube player…
Fetching transcript data…
We’ll display the transcript, summary, and all view options as soon as everything loads.
Next steps
Loading transcript tools…
Debating a Oneness Pentecostal, Who Is Jesus? | NeedGod․net | YouTubeToText
YouTube Transcript: Debating a Oneness Pentecostal, Who Is Jesus?
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Video Summary
Summary
Core Theme
This content is a live stream from needgod.net where host Ryan and his team answer viewer questions about Christian theology, biblical interpretation, and evangelism, interspersed with Bible trivia and music. The overarching message emphasizes the centrality of Jesus Christ and the gospel for salvation and living a Christian life.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
In the cities, in the countryside,
wherever people roam, there's a hope
that's found in Jesus Christ that can
lead them safely home. Share the gospel
far and wide. Let his love be our guide.
From the mountains to the sea, spread
the truth that sets us free in every
heart and every land. Let the world come
to understand
the grace that flows from Calvary. Share
the gospel far and wide.
Far and wide. Hey guys, good to have you
here on our stream. Welcome to
needgod.net. My name is Ryan and we're
going to get into your thoughtprovoking
questions that you may have. You can put
those questions in the chat and we'll
get into that in just a moment. Uh we're
going to do some Bible trivia as well
today. Some viewer chats, some gospel
conversations, and a Cahoot game. Lots
of exciting things in store. So, let's
get the team that's here to say hi to
you. So, hello there from Ryan.
>> Hi from Eevee. Sorry, that was difficult.
difficult.
>> Hello from Edson.
Hello from Chay.
>> Hey there from Chris.
>> Hey, great team we got here so far. More
laborers will probably rock up as we go
along today, but I'm going to get Chris
to pray for us to begin.
>> Father, as we start this stream, I ask
that you are with us. I ask that the
noise of the world that can drown out
your message uh is brought low, that we
can focus and we can learn from you. I
ask that you give us all wisdom and
patience as we go through the stream. I
pray that everyone here will be brought
closer to you and that you'll be
glorified as we go throughout the night.
I ask that you give Ryan uh your spirit
and wisdom to answer in the way that
would glorify you the best and that we
can go through the day recognizing that
even though we don't deserve it, your
mercies have overwhelmed us and allowed
us to have it. And may we all live with
great thanks for that. Sure. In Jesus
name. Amen.
>> Amen. Yes. God is so kind to us, isn't
he? Thanks for that, Chris. Appreciate
that a lot. Let's get into your questions.
questions.
>> Got a thought, a doubt, a wondering
mind. It's question time. Let answers
unwind. Drop it in the chat. Start with
the letter Q. We're here to explore
God's word with you. Needgod.net is
live. Ready to explain from faith to
hope to why he came. So don't hold back.
Don't be shy. Together, let's uncover
his truth and comply. Questions welcome.
Bring them near.
We'll share God's word. Make it clear.
Check it with the Bible. Your chapter
and verse. It's a Q&A. The pages of
scripture will traverse. Be patient.
Listen. Your time will come. Let's learn
and grow in God's kingdom. Just before I
start off with your questions, I want to
I I wrote a a status on X last night and
this was the question that I asked said,
"For those who love to call Mary the
mother of God, are they also willing to
call Joseph the father of God?"
What do and what do you think? Because
like obviously technically it's true
because Jesus is God and Mary was the
mother of Jesus. Therefore, you can
technically call Mary the mother of God.
But it's confusing for a lot of people
because it makes people think what God
the father she's the mother of or you
know it can be confusing in that sense.
And so I asked the question is it okay
to call Joseph the father of God? And I
got mixed responses from different
people saying no you can't say that.
That's going to be confusing for people.
It's going to make people think that
Joseph is the father of God the father.
Ah okay. Hey, well, wouldn't that be
something that would happen if you call
her mother of God? Couldn't people think
the same thing?
Uh, you had I had Redeem Zuma respond to
me by saying, "Oh, yes, of course you
can call Joseph the father of God." And
you you can also call St. Anne the
grandmother of God.
Now, first of all, St. Anne Anne is not
mentioned in the Bible as being a
grandmother of Jesus Christ. If you look
at the genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke
3, you don't see an there. That would
came from the proto evangelium of James
which was uh not from the Bible. That
came after it was not written by James.
Fraudulent document. They get the name
Anne or Anna there.
Now we do have the genealogies of ma
Mary and Joseph in Matthew 1 and Luke 3.
But would it be helpful to call Healey
the grandfather of God? Probably not,
right? That wouldn't be helpful.
And I even then asked this question. I
pose this question. Jesus said,
you know, um, who is my mother? Who are
my brothers? The one who does the will
of my father is my mother and, uh,
brother and sister. So would it be
helpful for a believer today to to call
themselves the mother of God?
I don't think that would be helpful that
if anything at best it's going to be confusing.
confusing.
And so couldn't that same logic be
applied to when people love to call Mary
the mother of God? It's confusing for a
lot of people. While technically true,
it's confusing. And that's why I always
aim for clarity. And that was the aim of
the Apostle Paul as well. clarity in
what he presented.
Have a look.
Paul's asked for prayer. He says, "At
the same time, pray also for us that God
may open to us a door for the word to
declare the mystery of Christ on account
of which I am in prison that I may make
it clear which is how I ought to speak."
Right? So Paul was
um concerned about clarity particularly
in obviously the presenting of the
gospel. But this is in this would be in
all forms of whenever you're teaching,
whenever you're proclaiming truth about
scripture, let it be clear uh and not
confusing for people would be what I'd say.
say.
All right. Uh let's go to your
questions. Uh and by the way, also I
want to give you a heads up. I So after
the debate with Noah, Noah has said, "Oh
yeah, he'd love to do another debate
with me on one of the Marian dogmas."
um particularly the sinlessness of Mary.
And so I said, "Okay, um we could
probably do that maybe in early December
or something like that if it's if it
suits him on this this phrasing."
The phrase, the debate would be
the Bible, he'd be affirmative, I'd be
negative. The the topic would be the
Bible teaches that Mary has always been sinless.
sinless.
And so that's what uh I've proposed that
debate topic to him at that wording. And
so I haven't heard back from just yet,
but I think he's probably going to be
willing to do that. And so that may
happen in early December.
How could you even support that though?
How could you support that? The Bible
teaches that Mary's always been sinless.
There's nothing in the Bible that even
indicates that. Not even gives an
illusion to it.
probably they might try to say, "Oh,
she's like the new Eve or she's the ark
of the covenant." Which is just not even
true. She's not described as the ark of
the covenant. If anything, you could say
Jesus is the ark of the new arc of the
covenant, but not Mary because Mary's
not God. Yeah.
Yeah.
And even as Corey says, Mary says she
has a savior. Yeah. Luke 1:47,
"I rejoice in God my savior."
All right, here we go. question from
uh Hiv who's asked, "Hey bro Ryan, can
you please explain John 14:12? Can we do
this?" All right, let's have a look.
John 14:12. Truly, truly I say to you,
whoever believes in me will also do the
works that I do, and greater works than
these will he do because I'm going to
the father.
Okay. So, greater works than these. Now,
greater in what sense? greater in
individual actions or greater in extent.
Jesus was one man living in the land of
Israel and he did amazing actions. I
don't think anyone would ever surpass
the works of Jesus Christ. He made
atonement for sins.
No one none of us can do the same. So
therefore, no one is going to surpass
Jesus in any of his actions that he did
while he was here. But it mustn't then
mean greater in power. It must mean
greater in extent. He's one man and
collectively as as believers we're many
people and we can reach than all the
different parts of the world. Reaching
more places where Jesus didn't go to.
And so that's what he's saying. Greater
works in these you do. So greater in
extent not greater in individual action.
Next one from Warrick is 1 Corinthians
16:1 and2 descriptive or prescriptive
now concerning the collection for the
saints as I directed the churches of
Galatia. So you also are to do. On the
first day of every week, each of you is
to put something aside and store it up
as he may prosper so there be no
collecting when I come. This is Paul
giving some instructions to the
Corinthian church about this specific
collection. Now what was this specific
collection? Paul had asked them to give
relief to the churches that were in
Jerusalem. Why? Because there was a
famine in Jerusalem.
And so he asked that if the churches in
these other regions of the Roman Empire
could help the saints that were in
Jerusalem. Paul speaks about this in
Romans 15 as well.
I'll bring it up for you guys. It says here,
here,
"At present, however, I'm going to
Jerusalem bringing aid to the saints."
So, it's great poverty happening, famine
happening in Jerusalem. They needed aid.
And there wasn't really government
support at that time. So, therefore, the
saints had to raise up some money and
some aid to help them out. And it says,
"For Macedonia and Aaya have been
pleased to make some some contribution
for the poor among the saints at
Jerusalem." Lots of poor who in who were
in the church in Jerusalem.
Yeah. And so then once he delivers that,
he's going to go on to Spain after going
and visiting Rome. So this is just the
instructions. He's saying, "Look, I
don't want to have to try and get this
gift. I've asked you guys, can you give
to Jerusalem church? And so when I go or
when I come, make sure you've got it all
ready so that I don't have to be trying
to ask everyone at that time. He wants
them just to have it ready so that he
can just they can just give it to Paul
and Paul can carry it to Jerusalem and
give them some aid. So that seems to be
for that unique period of time.
That's unique. not giving an alltime
description that
that always you need to give to the
saints in Jerusalem or that you can't
you must collect only on a Sunday the
first day of the week and not other
days. Yeah, it's not giving any sort of
prescription regards to that.
All right. Uh next one from Daniel.
What's the best apologetics to use
against a Muslim? The gospel. Preach the
gospel to him. Show him the deficiency
of workspace salvation. Show him how
good works don't pay for bad works. Give
examples of how in a court of law that
would never work. I always want to start
here because this is the key message you
want to communicate with a Muslim.
There's other things you can communicate
too. But if you go and talk about all
those other things, but you miss the
central message of Jesus Christ and him
crucified, you've not eternally helped
that Muslim in a way that's going to
even possibly save his soul. because the
gospel is the power of God for
salvation, not them learning about
Muhammad being a bad person. Now, I'm
not saying you can't talk about that.
That can be absolutely something you
talk about and that can be a helpful
argument, but only if you couple it with
the gospel. Gospel is key. You know,
when Paul went and preached Jesus Christ
and him crucified, his focus wasn't on
how bad all the pagan deities are. His
focus was on preaching Jesus. Now, he
still did mention like, look, God
doesn't dwell in temples made by hands.
This statue here, look, he did make some
mention to it, but that wasn't his
focus. It was Jesus. It was Jesus. So,
in 1 Corinthians chapter 2
verse 2, he says, "I decided to know
nothing among you except Jesus Christ
and him crucified." So, he had a central
focus on preaching Jesus.
So, focus that, focus on that. show the
deficiency of a worksbased salvation.
How it doesn't save you, doesn't satisfy
justice. How is justice satisfied if
your sins are just overlooked by Allah.
You can also show how in the Quran it
mentions how every Muslim is going to go
to hell even for a limited amount of
time, but still every Muslim will go to
hell. And you can ask them, why would
you want to believe in a religion where
you're guaranteed going to hell, 100%
guaranteed going to hell for any amount
of time? That's not a religion you
really want to follow.
Um and and so it makes sense that
actually you want a religion that's
going to save you from hell, prevent you
from having to go there. The only one
that does is Christianity. When you got
a savior who dies for you, then you can
obviously talk about why why should you
trust Muhammad? Ask them why do you
trust Muhammad? How do you know he's
really a prophet of God? Muslims have
zero answer to that.
They just stumble around. They have no
idea. And then you can say, look, the
fact that you have no good reason to
trust Muhammad should make you think
maybe I shouldn't trust him, but there's
plenty of good reason why we should
trust Jesus. And so compare the
deficiency of Muhammad to the
amazingness of Jesus and how he's proven
himself by his miracles. He's consistent
with the earlier prophets and also his
behavior is flawless.
This one from the lesser. Have you ever
had a conversation with someone from the
Church of Christ? Uh yes, I have on
viewer chats as well. And unfortunately,
yeah, they do hold to a worksbased
message of salvation. They think that
baptism is the way for you to be saved.
And unfortunately, that is works based
salvation. And so, yeah,
yeah,
I show them how salvation is truly by
grace through faith. And just like I did
in the debate the other day I had I
showed the sufficiency of faith.
Church of Christ are going to say that
faith is insufficient to save. You need
something extra.
For Roman Catholics it's keeping the
commandments. For church of Christ it's baptism.
baptism.
And so then you can just show how no no
that woman in the city in Luke 7:50
Jesus says your sins are forgiven. your
faith has saved you. She didn't get
baptized. She didn't keep the
commandments. She had faith and she was forgiven.
forgiven.
So, show that's what I do. Um, show
those sort of passages like I brought up
in the debate. Show them Romans 4:5,
Romans 4:6, and if God's willing, then
God can soften their heart and bring
them to himself. A super chat that came
in from Patrick. Thanks so much,
Patrick, for sending in your super chat today.
>> Pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace
peace
along with those who call on the Lord
from a pure heart.
>> Patrick says, "Is being convinced that
you yourself will go to heaven 100% part
of having saving faith? I don't get how
a person can go from not believing to
believing if that is the case.
Okay, maybe think of it this way. If I
say to you that I'm going to bring
dinner over to your place tonight at 6:00
6:00 and
and
you're like, uh, I don't know if he
really will. I'm only 50% sure he will.
I'm not really sure if Ryan's going to
drop off that dinner as he promised.
Well, then you're not trusting me. See
that? That would not be trusting me.
Trusting me is like, "Yeah, I am fully convinced
convinced
that he will drop off that dinner as he
said he would." That's having faith in
me. And so that's also what's having
faith in God, in Christ, and his
promises. All right? God has promised
you will not perish. You will have
eternal life if you're believing in
Christ because he's paid the price for
all of your sins. And so therefore, if
you're like, "Yeah, I don't know if I'm
really going to heaven. Probably not."
Then you're not trusting in Jesus.
Trusting in Jesus will be um fully
convinced that he'll live up to his
promises and therefore I'm going to go
to heaven. Because when I ask people,
"How sure are you going to heaven?" They
say 50%. I say, "Okay, why 50% not
sure?" Well, because I sin too much or I
don't do enough good deeds. So what are
they relying upon to get them into
heaven? their lack of sinning and them
doing extra good deeds. So, not relying
on Christ to get them there. Now, can
Christians ever have thoughts that pop
up in their mind where they're like
doubtful thoughts? Sure. But that still
doesn't change their them being fully
convinced that Christ will live up to
his promise. Now, why do I say fully
convinced? Because that's the language
that Paul uses in Romans 4:21.
Speaking about Abraham here, it says
Abraham was fully convinced that God is
able to do what he had promised. Fully
convinced, not partially, maybe. You
might do it, God. I'll find out. That's
not that's not faith. He was fully
convinced. When God says, "You'll have a
son. You'll have as many offspring as
the stars of the sky." That very
instant, he was fully convinced. And
have a look at the next verse. That is
why his faith was counted to him as
righteousness. So why was his faith
count to him as righteousness? because
he was fully convinced.
He didn't waver. He didn't think, "I
don't know if I can trust God." He
trusted him. And God counted that faith
to him as righteousness. And so, same
with us. If we trust God's promises and
what he's done to save us, we'll have
eternal life. So, how do you go from not
believing to believing? Well, you just
hear this message and you say, "I want
that. I want Jesus to die for me. I want
to go to heaven to be with my Lord. And
so I'm trusting now that I am going to
heaven because he took that punishment
All right, this one from Raphael. Is God
really pleased with the punishment of
the wicked? Psalm 16:4, Romans 9:22,
Ezekiel 18:32, and Lamentations 3:33.
Wow, a few passages there.
So bring up maybe just maybe a couple of them.
them.
Uh oh, Proverbs. That was Proverbs, not
Psalms. Proverbs 16:4.
The Lord has made everything for its
purpose, even the wicked for the day of
trouble. Yeah. So, the Lord has a
purpose for everything. Every human
being has a purpose. You'll either be a
vessel of honor or a vessel of dishonor.
You'll either be one that God has
prepared for glory or for destruction.
What if God desiring to show his wrath?
Yeah. God desires to show wrath, pour
out judgment upon people, and to make
known his power, has endured with much
patience vessels of wrath prepared for
destruction. Right? So, he wants to show
wrath because then he gets to show how
just he is. He gets to showcase his
glory to us Christians. We can say,
"Wow, God, you're so amazingly just that
you're punishing the wicked. Praise be
to you, God." You realize that for all
eternity, we're going to be praising God
in heaven that he's pouring out his
wrath upon those in hell. Now, you might
say, "Wow, that's that's hard for me to
understand that." In heaven, you'll have
a sanctified mind perfectly. So, you'll
see it from God's perspective there. And
you'll see, yeah, those in hell hate
God. They're getting what they deserve,
and rightly so. So, you'll praise God
for his justice. But you also then
praise God for his mercy that he's shown
to you in order to make known the riches
of his glory for vessels of mercy, which
he's prepared beforehand for glory. If
there was no punishment for sin, then
there's no need for mercy. So God allows
sin to happen. People choose to sin. God
has great wrath and that gives God
opportunity to show mercy to those whom
I was thinking about this uh in the
topic, you know, the topic of was Mary
always sinless.
They try and say, "Oh, look, God
protected Mary from sin." Which is just
doesn't say that in scripture.
But that would mean Mary's in heaven
without the cross.
That means she did not need the cross if
that if their logic is true that she
wasn't a sinner. So then
the cross wasn't needed for her. But
isn't the whole point of scripture that
the cross is needed for every human
being because we're all sinners. We all
need the savior Jesus. But for Mary, she
doesn't need the savior Jesus. She
doesn't need Jesus to die on the cross
if if she's sinless. That is now clearly
she is sinful but
it just messes up everything doesn't it?
And then they say that Mary's mother was
sinless and they say that Mary's
mother's mother was sinless and they all
the way back to what Eve was Eve
sinless. Come on we know that Eve
sinned. Look at that in the look at the garden.
garden.
And so their logic just completely
Um, now in terms of Ezekiel 18,
Lamentations 3:33 when it says I'll
bring up this.
I have no pleasure in the death of
anyone. This is in regards to not hell.
This is not talking about hell. This is
talking about uh in terms of how the
Mosaic law should be enforced. It'd be
better if the person didn't break the
law or turn from breaking the Mosaic law
and therefore wouldn't have to be killed
by the society for transgressing it.
It's not talking about hell in
particular there. Now, lamentations, for
he does, for he does not afflict from
his heart or grieve the children of men.
Uh, let's have a context here.
The Lord will not cast off forever. This
is in regards to Israel and how he would
fulfill his plans with Israel because
the Lord will cast people off forever,
those in hell. We know that hell is
eternal, not temporary. So sometimes
people take Ezekiel 18, Lamentations 3,
and then apply it more generally when
those passages are more speaking about
how Israel should enact the Mosaic law
and God's opinion about the enacting of
that Mosaic law and in Lamentations, how
God's going to fulfill his promise to
restore Israel.
All right, Patrick sent in a follow-up
>> But kind to everyone,
All right. Patrick says, "I would need
to see it as a secondary belief that
comes after trusting in Christ. Since if
you trust Christ, you receive eternal
life and then you can know that you'll
But trust what about Christ?
Trust that I'm going to heaven because
he died on the cross for my sins. That's
trusting Christ, isn't it?
Yeah. It's that
Jesus has said to me, like again, go
back to my example, I'll bring dinner
over to you at 6:00. If I said that to
you, then trusting me means trusting
that I'll bring dinner over at 6:00.
That's what it means to trust me in that
context. So trusting Christ is not just
trusting he's a real person or that he's
just generally a reliable person,
but trusting that he has sacrificed his
life to save me, so I'm forgiven.
Um, and Patrick says, "I think being
convinced that God can raise the dead is
enough to have saving faith, if that
makes sense." No, no, no, no, no. That's
not sufficient to have be saved. Mormons
believe that God can raise the dead. Is
that sufficient to save them? Those who
trust in their good works to get to heaven,
heaven,
also believe that raising the dead, that
Jesus, that God can raise the dead.
Demons believe that God can raise the
dead. a demon saved.
So clearly just believing a fact about
God that God can do something. He has
all ability. In fact, Muslims would
believe this that God can raise the
dead. What's unique is that we need to
be trusting in what Christ has done to
save us as the only means of entry to
heaven. Which is why when I had the
debate on Monday,
your Sunday, um, with Noah, what do we
see? we see that he wasn't trusting
exclusively in Jesus to get him to
heaven. He was trusting in his
commandment keeping and his baptism and
his loving God and other things like
that. So therefore he doesn't have trust
in Jesus, not a saving trust in Jesus at
least. And so saving trust in Jesus is
believing in the sufficiency of Christ
to get me to heaven and therefore I'm
going to heaven because of him.
All right, this one from Jesse. I'm a
believer who's just started to take
faith seriously. Awesome. Good to hear
that. But the last few days, I've had a
fear of going to hell like I've never
had before. Is doubting slashw worrying
normal? This much normal?
Keep reminding yourself, Jesse. See,
this is a good example. Um, even in
light of Patrick's question,
a true Christian can experience what
Jesse's experiencing.
true Christian. But that it doesn't mean
that Jesse's not fully convinced,
right? Because you can be still fully
convinced of Christ and what he's done
for you and still have crazy thoughts
pop into up into your head that you
don't sincerely believe.
All right? You can have crazy thoughts
that pop up into your head about God's
existence. Doesn't mean you sincerely
don't believe in God.
You see that? So you can be still fully
convinced and yet have thoughts that
come up. And so I think what you should
do is conquer those thoughts by
reminding yourself of the truth. You
can't stop the birds from flying over
your head, but you can definitely stop
All right, this one from James. Someone
challenged me to prove Jesus and the
father are perfect after I made the
claim. What would you go to prove this?
H, it's an interesting question. Um, I'd
probably go to in regards to Jesus, like
Jesus in John 8 stood before his enemies
saying, "Which one of you accuses me of
sin?" And guess what? They're all
silent. Not not a single one could say,
"Jesus, you're sinner in this way." So,
their lack of actually accusing him of
any sin is a massive proof that he is
because he's giving them a it's like
giving on a platter to them. If you
think I've sinned, tell me what. And
they couldn't say anything because there
was nothing wrong. In terms of the
father, this is pretty easy as well to
show that the father is perfect. You
therefore must be perfect as your
heavenly father is perfect. Like this is
just right there proven. Case closed.
The father is perfect because it
literally says your heavenly father is
perfect. And we know that Jesus is in
the same nature as the father. He is the
radiance of the glory of God in the
exact imprint of his nature. And so if
the nature of God, the father is to be
perfect. And so if Jesus is the exact
imprint of his nature, then also he must
be perfect. In fact, if he wasn't
perfect, then how could he make
atonement for our sins?
1 Peter 2:22, he committed no sin. This
is about Christ. He committed no sin,
neither was deceit found in his mouth.
Very clear. Jesus committed no sin. What
about Hebrews 4:15?
We do not have a high priest who is
unable to sympathize with our
weaknesses, but one who in every respect
has been tempted as we are, yet without
sin. Notice there's clear verses in the
Bible that speak about Jesus
sinlessness, but there's no verses in
the Bible that speak about Mary's sinlessness.
sinlessness.
So why would people hold on to the man
the sinlessness of Mary?
It makes sense to hold on to the
sinlessness of Jesus and the father and
even of the Holy Spirit. So the passage
about who convicts you of me of sin,
that's in John 8:46. Which one of you
convicts me of sin? Jesus says
and if if I tell the truth, why do you
not believe me?
You even got Jesus affirming himself and
the father is one. I and the father are one.
one.
Yeah. So that's That's how I'd prove it
to them. Good question there, James.
All right. Uh, next one from
uh Oh, James has actually got another
one here. I heard a sermon by the late
pastor John MacArthur when he said that
the apostles Jesus chose were an
indictment on the religion of Judaism of
the time. What's your thoughts on this?
Depends what he's meaning. Like, um, you
haven't told me what sense he's meaning
indictment. Is it in the sense I can see
probably what he's meaning is that
he didn't choose the Pharisees, the
Sadducees, the Jewish religious leaders
to be his disciples. He chose 12
ordinary men. Some were fishermen. One
was a tax collector. The others were not
even sure what their occupation was.
They're nobodies in this world. And yet
God didn't choose
the religious one leaders, the ones who
walked around in their long robes making
their felactories broad and their
fringes long. Now he picked these
ordinary guys, uneducated common men.
They're described in the book of Acts
because God uses nobodies. It's the
great reversal. If you want to be great
in God's kingdom,
be the servant of all.
So yeah, I think in a way that probably
I can see how it would be a rebuke to
the the Jewish religious leaders that he
didn't pick them. And in fact, the ones
who most hated Jesus were the Jewish
religious leaders
when the people not as much, but more so
the Jewish religious leaders who tried
to do everything to plot to try and kill him.
him.
But interestingly, the Gentiles were the
ones who had greater faith. Even the
centurion in Matthew 8, Jesus says,
"With no one in all Israel have I found
such faith."
What a rebuke to every Jewish person at
that time. With no one in Israel have I
found such faith. This gentile had more
faith than all the Jewish people.
Because remember, it's not about
ethnicity. It's not about that at all.
It's just about having that humble heart
and willingness to trust the promises of God.
God.
All right. Uh, next one
from Martin. Seeking guidance. Is it
okay to remain in a church where the
preaching is hardly Christ/Gosspel-
centered, but there is a wonderful
community of believers who are
like-minded, gospel focused? Yeah,
that's up to you. That's really up to
you what you consider important.
Obviously, ideally would be you want a
church that has a preaching that's
uh exogetical
verse by verse, gospel centered, Christ
centered, just preaching Jesus Christ
and crucified.
As long as they're not like just
preaching complete heresy, then you'd be
like you probably want to leave it or
try and get as many people out of that
church as possible. if they're preaching
a false a false or worksbased gospel.
But in your scenario, it's less it's not
so much not heretical, but it's also not
as gospel focused as you'd want it to
be. Well, then
I would suggest that it's up to you
whether you stay or not because if you
can have a good influence there and if
you're getting the good Christian
fellowship and the gospel- centered
conversations, everything with the
people that are there and maybe you're
helping them and maybe you might be able
to help the church leadership, give some
suggestions, some gentle guidance to
them about what you would love to see
happen at church, then yeah, it's up to
you. I don't think there's a hard and
fast rule uh that you'd have to leave there.
there.
All right, this one from Shamga. Yes,
the third judge in the book of Judges is
back. Good to have you here, brother.
>> For the word of the cross is falling
to those who are perishing,
but to us who are being saved,
it is the power of God. Shamgar says JWs
add the word other in Colossians 1:16-1
17 and verse 20. They do. If you look at
their older edition of the New World
Translation, they had the word other in
italics to show that it's in an inserted
word. But in their latest edition,
they've removed the italics and they've
just left it there in the text, which is
incredibly deceiving.
So, I'll show you. For for by him all
things were created. Now here when it
says all things they say all other
things were created.
They think that Christ created all other
things. Why do they do that? Because
they want to believe that Jesus is a
created being
which is terrible heresy. Aryanism
and it doesn't say other. If you look at
the Greek there's no other. And now the
way to show JW about this go to the new
world trans go to the uh the kingdom
into linear that's on the JW website.
So, so the Kingdom Interlinear is is a
JW publication used. It's a physical
thing, but it's now also on their
website. So, if I I'll show you guys
All right. So, I just went to the JW
website. I went to I searched for
Kingdom Interline. This is the page that
Maybe just search for it. Oh, yeah.
Colossians chapter 1 and we're going to
scroll down to verse 16.
Okay, ready?
This is from the Greek literal to the
English. Okay, let's see if they have
the word other in there. Because in him
it was created the all things in heavens
and upon the earth. Notice there's no
the word other. So what's this
translated? All things were created
through him. That's what it's saying.
But if you then look at the New World Translation,
Translation,
and I think if I just search here, it
probably come up with the New World
Translation one
And okay, here we go. Ready? This is the
New World Translation. Because by means
of him all other things were created.
They've literally inserted the word
other right there. dishonesty to the key
to the max right there. And so how you
can show them it's dishonest is just go
to their kingdom in linear and show it
doesn't say all other things. It just
says all things right here. All things.
That's what you can do. Now another
thing you can do with JW's
because they've changed Colossians 1:16.
What they haven't changed is John 1:3.
They actually haven't changed John 1:3
in even their own translation.
Let me bring it up in their translation.
Okay, John 1 is about Jesus, right?
Let me copy it down. I'll copy on and
All right, copy.
There it is. Okay.
All right. John, I'll make sure you know
guys know what this is. John 1 vers3.
There it is.
All things came into existence through
him. And apart from him, not even one
thing came into existence.
Look at that.
This is talking about Jesus. And they
don't add the word other here.
So they believe Jesus came into existence.
existence.
They think he's a created being.
So therefore following their logic they
have to believe that Jesus came into
existence through Jesus and apart from
Jesus not even Jesus came into existence
That's absurd cuz if you have to create
yourself then that means you exist
before you exist. But if you exist
before you exist then you already exist.
And so it's a contradiction in terms.
And so that's why I usually don't go to
Colossians 1:16 as much with JWS. I go
to John 1:3 and it completely destroys
their view of who Christ is. Christ is
not a created being. Christ is God. And
And
um he made everything which means he
All right. Uh next one. Here we go.
Jamie says, "Ryan, they try arguing the
word through means he was Jehovah's in
instrument, but it still doesn't answer
it because
how is Jesus Jehovah's instrument to
make himself? To be the instrument in
making himself, he's still got to exist
before he exists on their view." And so,
their view is not consistent with that
passage there.
All right. Uh, next one. There was a
super chat from
uh Barber. Thank you so much for sending
in your super chat. Wow. Wonder wonder
what current uh what currency that is.
What country in the world you're in. But
Uh Jamie says you can also use Romans
11:36 to show that all things are made
through the Father also. Oh, that's
helpful. Yeah. Thanks for that, Jamie.
For from him and through him and to him
are all things. To him be the glory
forever. Yeah, the same word through is
applied to the father here.
That's a good point. Really good point.
Uh thank you Justified who sent this one
in for us. Appreciate that.
>> Blessed is the man who makes the Lord.
Who does not turn to the proud to those
who go astray after a life.
You have multiplied, oh Lord my God,
your wondrous deeds and your thoughts
toward us. None can compare with you.
Is Isaiah 96? Oh, so no. Is Yeah, I
think it's a question, but then it's
also a statement. Looks like is Isaiah
96 is the best verse to show. JWS.
It could be a statement or a question.
I'll treat it as if it's a question. I
think it's a great verse to show. Let's
bring it up. Isaiah 9:6. I wonder what
I'll have to check what their
translation says on this. For to us,
Whoa, it's going to um There you go. For
to us a child is born, to us a son is
given, and the government shall be upon
his shoulder, and his name shall be
called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
Now, their translation, I wonder what
they've messed it up to be in regards to
this verse.
Actually, no, they haven't messed up
this one. So, their says exactly the
same thing here in Isaiah 9:6. Mighty God,
God,
eternal father, prince of peace. So,
their translation hasn't messed this one
up. But you know what their argument is?
Their argument is, "Oh, he's mighty God,
but he's not almighty God." See that?
Oh, look. It says mighty God, but he's
not the Almighty God.
Okay, that's interesting. But let's see.
Does the Old Testament call
God or Yahweh the mighty God? And the
answer is yes. We got Elgabore, a mighty
God, being used of God. different types.
Let me see if I can find the reference
Mighty God.
See if I can Okay, you've got Psalm 50 verse1.
verse1.
The mighty one,
God, the Lord. Who's described as the
mighty one?
Who's God?
Yahweh. Yahweh is or in their
translation Jehovah.
What about this Psalm 898? Oh Lord God
of hosts who is mighty as you, oh Lord.
Okay, again that shows it. What about
Isaiah 10:21?
A remnant will return, the remnant of
Jacob to the mighty God. So clearly
Yahweh is described as the mighty God.
And it speaks about in Isaiah 9:6 that
mighty God will be born as a child.
What else? Jeremiah 32:18.
You show steadfast love to thousands,
but you repay the guilt of fathers to
their children after them. Oh great and
mighty God, whose name is
the Lord of hosts, Yahweh.
So their argument holds no weight when
it says, "Oh, he's just mighty God but
not Almighty God." It's not a good
argument. How many mighty gods are there?
there?
There's only one. There's only one. And
Yeah. Um All right. Uh next question.
Here we go from Brian. Thank you, Brian,
for sending in your super chat for us.
For since in the wisdom of God
the world did not know God through wisdom,
wisdom,
it pleased God through the folly of what
we preach
Brian says, "Can you give context to
Hebrews 10:38? Does it mean a believer
can lose faith? And if it does, the what
happens if they believe again years
later? Good question. So it says here,
"But my righteous one shall live by faith,
faith,
and if he shrinks back, my soul has no
pleasure in him." So the Hebrews are
feeling tempted to leave Christianity
and to go back to Judaism. And
And
in this chapter, he's described what's
going to happen to those who reject
Christ. And this is what the going on
sinning deliberately is talking talking
about. It's not just talking about
generally sinning because we all
generally sin deliberately at different
times in our life. This is talking about
going on sinning deliberately in
regarding regards to rejecting Jesus.
after you've come to the knowledge of
Jesus and you say you don't want him
anymore and you reject him altogether.
No sacrifice left for you if you die in
that unbelief.
Instead, there's just a fearful
expectation of judgment and a fury of
fire that will consume the adversaries.
So, he's really stressing out don't or
he's really encouraging these Hebrews
don't be like these people who give up
and go back to their old system of
belief because vengeance is mine. I will
repay, God says. And again, the Lord
will judge his people. It is a fearful
thing to fall into the hands of the
living God. You don't want to fall into
his hands of justice. But then he goes
on encourages them by saying, "But look,
but you guys after you were enlightened,
you endured a lot of sufferings,
sometimes being publicly exposed to
reproach and affliction, and sometimes
being partners with those so treated.
For you had compassion on those in
prison, and you joyfully accepted the
plundering of your property, since you
knew you had a better possession and an
abiding one.
Therefore, do not throw away your
confidence, which has a great reward.
So, it's it's clearly about throwing
away your faith,
guys. Don't throw away your faith. Even
if you're offered 30 pieces of silver to
throw away your faith, it's not worth
it. What's the benefit of having the 30
pieces of silver, having billions of
dollars, and then going to hell when you die?
die?
Don't throw away your confidence. It has
great reward.
For you have need of endurance. So, this
destroys free grace theology. People who
say that you don't need to keep on
believing. Yes, you do. You have need of
endurance so that when you have done the
will of God, you may receive what is
promised. What's the will of God? the
continuing to have trust in Christ.
You've done the will of God by
continuing to hold on to him in faith
and you'll receive what he's promised to
you. So you need endurance in that for
yet a little while and the coming one
will come and will not delay. Won't be
long Christian before your struggle here
with on this earth is up before Christ
comes back. But my righteous one shall
live by faith and if he shrinks back my
soul has no pleasure in him. Meaning if
he gives up on the faith and doesn't
have that trust in Jesus to the end, God
has no pleasure in that person. They're
going to hell. Not that they had
salvation and lost it. It's not saying
that at all. It's just that they profess
to be in Christ and then they're no
longer professing to be in Christ, which
evidences that they're not in Christ and
therefore never really were in Christ
even though they profess to for a long
time. But then have a look at verse 39.
I love this. But we are not of those who
shrink back and are destroyed. So the
true believers aren't of those who give
up. The false believers, yeah, they give
up. A lot of them give up before they
die. But the true ones don't. The true
ones don't shrink back. They don't give
up on trusting in Jesus. They hold on to
that confidence in him to the end. We
are of those who have faith. Notice, if
you have faith, you preserve your souls.
And if you have faith, you don't shrink
back. You don't really have faith, yeah,
you'll shrink back and you'll be
destroyed. and your soul will not be preserved.
preserved.
Hopefully, it's helpful, Brian, in
Uh, so Jonathan says, "So, apostasy and
throwing off the faith is actually a
thing." Yeah, there are people who
profess to be Christians and then they
no longer profess to be Christians. So,
it's like they're throwing off the
faith, but the reality is they never had
the faith to begin with. They just
professed to, but they didn't possess
saving faith.
A good passage that shows this would be
John 1 John 2:19.
They went out from us, but they were not
of us. For if they had been of us, they
would have continued with us. But they
went out that it might become plain that
they all are not of us.
Those you leave were not of us to begin with.
with.
Yes. As Denine says, an empty profession.
profession.
That's true. Empty profession. All
right. This one from Mike. Hey Ryan, how
do I explain to a non-believer
who is trying to argue the authenticity
of the Bible with the age of Ahaziah and
to prove that it's not a contradiction
slash error. Yeah, this one is quite
easy to explain. just bring it up in the
ESV translation or basically any modern translation
translation
and it's going to be the exact same age.
I'll show you. Aziah was 22 years old
when he began to reign. So, how old was
Aziah? Everyone put in the chat, how old
was Aziah?
According to 2 Kings 8:26,
Aziah was 22. Okay, 22 years old when he
began to reign. Okay, now let's see the
chronicles. This is the one where they
bring up their look. There's a
contradiction. Are you ready? I'm going
to bring it up and let's see what age it
says. 2 Chronicles 22:2. Aziah was 22
years old when he began to reign. He
reigned one year in Jerusalem. There's
no contradiction here. It literally has
the same age. I'll go back. This is 2
Kings 8:26. How old was he? 22. Go to 2
Chronicles 22:2. How old was he? 22
the exact same
age. No contradiction here.
And helpfully our modern translations
have this is because this is what the
manuscripts not just the Hebrew
manuscript like there there is a copiest
error in the Hebrew manuscripts but if
we incorporate the Syrian Coptic and um
other very early manuscripts they all
have 22 here. So 22 is the best reading
of the text. Hence why our modern
translations now that we know all this
information are going to have 22 and
that's why it has that. So their
argument only works if you use the KJV translation.
translation.
The KJV translation
they have unhelpfully made a mistake
here by saying that he was 42 years old
when Ahaziah began to rain.
Um, so yeah, this is only an error which
they can bring up in the KJV
translation, but not in our modern
translations like the ESV because
helpfully they incorporate all the
manuscripts that have been discovered
even since 400 years ago. Yeah.
Yeah.
So there's no issue there. There's
actually no contradictions. Go back to
your question, Mike. There's no
contradictions, no errors in the Bible,
not even ASI. show them in the ESV and
then it destroys their um argument.
All right, this one from YT. Is faith a
work or is it a result of grace? As in
do we merit faith or is it something
given to us?
Faith is not a work. We know that
because of Romans
4:5 which says, "And to the one who does
not work but believes, showing therefore
believing is not a work." Now baptism is
a work. Sharing the gospel is a work.
Going to church is a work. But faith is
not because it's something internal.
Works are external. Faith is something
internal. Faith is a conviction of the
heart. Works actions that happen
externally. So baptism and external
action. Circumcision external action.
Going to church external action. They're
all works. So simple. I don't know. I
don't I understand why people find that
controversial. Clearly anything external
is a work. things that are internal like
faith is not a work.
Now is it a result of grace?
Well, God grants us faith. It says that
in Philippians 1:29. So everything is by grace.
grace.
But faith is the means which God has
appointed for us to receive the grace of
salvation. For by grace you have been
saved through what? Faith. So the faith
is the means by which we access the
And do we merit faith or is it something
given to us? Well, it's granted to us.
Faith is granted, but it's still from
our perspective something that we've
chosen to do. We've chosen to trust in
Christ. But yes, it is God who granted
to us that we should not only believe in
him. So that that shows that believing
is granted but also suffering. Suffering
for Jesus would also be granted by God.
All right. All right, this one from Chu.
Thanks so much for sending a new super
>> Whether in pretense or in truth,
Christ is proclaimed
Um, okay. So Chu says, "Do you have a
few books of the Bible that I could
focus on to work on myself, my conduct,
and my love?"
Yes, I would say probably go through
Romans. Romans gives you first of all
great summary of the gospel in the first
number of chapters of it. But then the
final like chapters 12 through to 16 are
really helpful on practical Christian
living. 12 has like command after
command of how God wants us to live. And
so that'll help on your conduct, your
love and things like that. But I think
the first 11 chapters will also be
helpful in you just being reminded of
the gospel because the best motivator
for obedience, best motivator motivator
for holiness is on the back of the
gospel. What Christ has done for us
makes us want to be more obedient to
him. If you don't think you've been
shown that much love from God, then you
won't love him very much and therefore
you won't want to be that obedient to
him. The one who's been forgiven little
loves little. The one who's been
forgiven much loves much. Which is why
you'll find
the people like often Roman Catholics
who trust in their own obedience to get
to heaven and not just faith alone in
Christ alone often don't read their
Bibles that much don't really value
holiness as much as somebody who
believes we're saved by faith alone in
Christ alone. You'll often find them
being more holy the ones that are
trusting Christ alone not their works
because we don't think we're doing it
because we have to. We're doing it
because we love God. I mean, we know how
much he's shown us great love. You'll
find that that makes Christians more
obedient, far more obedient than those
who trust in works. So, Romans is a good
one. You probably go through like
something like Colossians or Ephesians.
Those two books are pretty good on
practical instructions for Christian
living as well.
Just a follow-up question from Kitty.
John 6:29 says, "Faith is a work." I
know you say it's it's the work God
does, but that totally nullifies the
context. It doesn't nullify the context.
They were asking in John 6, the crowd,
the unbelieving crowd saying, "What work
do we have to do to be doing the works
of God?" And then Jesus says, "This is
the work of God that you believe." As in
whose work is it? Is it your work? No,
it is the work of God. It's God's work.
Faith is God's work because God is the
one who does the drawing and the
granting and the softening of your
heart. He does all those sort of things
to save to bring a person to to faith in Christ.
Christ.
But Kitty, how you interpret John 6
cannot contradict the rest of the Bible.
At least how I interpret John 6 doesn't
contradict Romans 4:5. But how you've
interpreted John 6 does
to the one who does not work but
believes. So this clearly shows
believing is not a work. And not just
this verse, I'll give you another one.
Romans 11:6 says says this, "But if it
is by grace, it is no longer on the
basis of works. Otherwise, grace would
no longer be grace." So as soon as you
make salvation dependent upon your
works, even just one work, it's not
grace-based salvation. And so if you
want to say that faith is a work, then
you don't believe in grace-based
salvation. Simple as that. Because as
soon as it's on the basis of works, it's
not grace.
It's not grace.
So that is why faith cannot be a work.
And you couple this with Romans 4:16
which says that is why it depends on
faith in order that the promise may rest
on grace. It can only rest on grace if
it depends on faith. Why? Because faith
is not a work. But if faith is a work,
then it doesn't depend on grace because
grace means not works.
Yeah. So I think we've got to interpret
scripture consistently
and if what if your interpretation of a
particular verse contradicts
other verses then probably that would
mean your interpretation of that verse
Samuel's got a spicy question for us
here. Hey, appreciate your questions.
Even the spicy ones. Um this one, why do
you call yourself Protestant when you
condemn all the reformers for believing
baptism says and for believing real
presence of the Eucharist?
Hey, guess what? I call myself
particularly a Christian because that's
the only label that the Bible gives. Christian.
Christian.
Now, I have no issue if we because the
word Protestant just simply means it
doesn't mean you lived in the 16th
century or Yeah. the 16th or 17th
century. That's not what Protestant
means in today's con context, in today's
vernacular. What Protestant means in
today's vernacular is that you hold the
scripture as being the standard that you
check everything with as opposed to an
institution like the Catholic Church or
the Orthodox Church. So if that's what
the word Protestant means today,
it may have meant something different in
the 16th century, but what how it's used
today is those who hold scripture as
being the standard, then I can say,
"Yeah, I hold scripture as the
standard." And so based on that modern
definition of Protestant, I I guess
anyone who holds scripture as a standard
would be a Protestant then if they hold
that as the standard. Um now going to
the thing you said all the reformers
believe baptism saved. Really? Do they
think that justification happened by
baptism? Justification's by baptism. All
the reformers believe that.
Now you have Luther maybe indicating
that you don't find Calvin. You don't
find even the Westminster Confession of
Faith saying that baptism is what
justifies you. They actually make very
clear that justification happens
by the means the sole instrument of
justification. They say I showed it the
other day on the stream here. The sole
instrument of justification is faith.
And faith is not the same as baptism.
They're two different things. Two very
different things.
And so therefore, no, your statement is
just incorrect. And you probably got
that from Deem Zoomer or something like
that. He often likes to misrepresent
what the Protestants believe, what the um many of the early Protestants or
um many of the early Protestants or confessions of faith taught. Now, real
confessions of faith taught. Now, real presence in the Eucharist, what do you
presence in the Eucharist, what do you mean by real presence in the Eucharist?
mean by real presence in the Eucharist? Are you talking about
Are you talking about transubstantiation? Is that what you're
transubstantiation? Is that what you're meaning? What sense real? Because I can
meaning? What sense real? Because I can affirm when Jesus says, "This is my
affirm when Jesus says, "This is my body. This is my blood." I can say,
body. This is my blood." I can say, "Amen. That is his body and that his
"Amen. That is his body and that his blood." In what sense though? That it's
blood." In what sense though? That it's changed substance that it's somehow now
changed substance that it's somehow now just human blood and it's human flesh?
just human blood and it's human flesh? No. Cuz that's not even what Jesus
No. Cuz that's not even what Jesus meant.
meant. So what did Jesus mean when he said,
So what did Jesus mean when he said, "This is my body. This is my blood."
"This is my body. This is my blood." Clearly these elements point to him.
Clearly these elements point to him. Do this in remembrance of me. So clearly
Do this in remembrance of me. So clearly these things remind us of Jesus. His
these things remind us of Jesus. His body broken and blood shed. So therefore
body broken and blood shed. So therefore this is and this is is talking about
this is and this is is talking about this helps you remember what I will do
this helps you remember what I will do for you and now for us what he has done
for you and now for us what he has done for us. You don't do something in
for us. You don't do something in remembrance of him if it's actually just
remembrance of him if it's actually just him. If you actually got Jesus in front
him. If you actually got Jesus in front of you when you're holding the bread
of you when you're holding the bread that's just literally Jesus. You don't
that's just literally Jesus. You don't do this in remembrance of him when
do this in remembrance of him when you've got him there. If that's
you've got him there. If that's literally him. Clearly it's not
literally him. Clearly it's not literally him.
literally him. That's why he says, "Whenever you eat
That's why he says, "Whenever you eat the bread and drink the cup, you
the bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he
proclaim the Lord's death until he comes." But Samuel, feel free to come
comes." But Samuel, feel free to come for a viewer chat later on if you'd like
for a viewer chat later on if you'd like to. We could we could chat about these
to. We could we could chat about these things uh further if you'd like. But my
things uh further if you'd like. But my encouragement is
encouragement is check everything with the Bible.
check everything with the Bible. more so than checking it with a
more so than checking it with a reformer, checking it with this person
reformer, checking it with this person or that person, checking it with the a
or that person, checking it with the a in the inspired apostles, the prophets
in the inspired apostles, the prophets that are all contained in scripture.
that are all contained in scripture. That would be the best port of call.
That would be the best port of call. That would be the best thing to rely on
That would be the best thing to rely on rather than I'm of Paul, I'm not of
rather than I'm of Paul, I'm not of Cphus, you know, like they were doing in
Cphus, you know, like they were doing in first Corinthians. Now, we want to
first Corinthians. Now, we want to believe the entirety of God's
believe the entirety of God's revelation, and that's all contained in
revelation, and that's all contained in scripture. A reformer is not inspired of
scripture. A reformer is not inspired of the Holy Spirit to speak infallibly.
All right. Uh, this one from Tyson. Thank you so much, Tyson, for your super
Thank you so much, Tyson, for your super chat for us today. For there is no
chat for us today. For there is no distinction. For all have sinned and
distinction. For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God and are
fall short of the glory of God and are justified by his grace as a gift through
justified by his grace as a gift through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. >> And just quickly um Samuel who made that
>> And just quickly um Samuel who made that last comment, do you think water baptism
last comment, do you think water baptism justifies you?
justifies you? Do you think faith is the only means of
Do you think faith is the only means of justification? Like reformers actually
justification? Like reformers actually believe and as Paul taught, you are
believe and as Paul taught, you are justified by faith. Do you believe we're
justified by faith. Do you believe we're justified by faith or do you believe
justified by faith or do you believe justification happens by water baptism?
justification happens by water baptism? Samuel, what's your answer? I want to
Samuel, what's your answer? I want to hear what you say to that.
hear what you say to that. All right. Um Tyson has sent this one
All right. Um Tyson has sent this one in. Thank you so much, Tyson, for your
in. Thank you so much, Tyson, for your super chat. Does God ignore the prayers
super chat. Does God ignore the prayers of unbelievers since they don't have the
of unbelievers since they don't have the Holy Spirit interpreting for them? Uh,
Holy Spirit interpreting for them? Uh, love your ministry, Ryan. God bless you
love your ministry, Ryan. God bless you and the team. Thank you, Tyson.
and the team. Thank you, Tyson. Appreciate your kind words there.
Appreciate your kind words there. Does God ignore the prayers of
Does God ignore the prayers of unbelievers? Now, we don't know exactly
unbelievers? Now, we don't know exactly what God does with every prayer of an
what God does with every prayer of an unbeliever. There's some passages that
unbeliever. There's some passages that say things like, "God abhors the prayers
say things like, "God abhors the prayers of the wicked." So, there is a verse
of the wicked." So, there is a verse like that. Does that mean he doesn't
like that. Does that mean he doesn't ever hear them? Well, he hears
ever hear them? Well, he hears everything because he he knows
everything because he he knows everything. So, it's not like he's
everything. So, it's not like he's doesn't hear what they're actually
doesn't hear what they're actually saying. Let me give you a couple
saying. Let me give you a couple passages. So, first of all, you got
passages. So, first of all, you got Proverbs 15:29. The Lord is far from the
Proverbs 15:29. The Lord is far from the wicked, but he hears the prayers of the
wicked, but he hears the prayers of the righteous.
righteous. Um, you've got
Um, you've got passages that
uh let me have a look. Okay, Cornelius might be a good example.
might be a good example. Cornelius in Acts chapter 10, you
Cornelius in Acts chapter 10, you remember how he was described as being a
remember how he was described as being a god-fearer?
god-fearer? It says here, he was a devout man who
It says here, he was a devout man who feared God with all his household, gave
feared God with all his household, gave arms generously to the to the people,
arms generously to the to the people, and prayed continually to God. Now, this
and prayed continually to God. Now, this guy is not a Christian, by the way. He's
guy is not a Christian, by the way. He's an un he's he's a believer in God, a
an un he's he's a believer in God, a God-fearer, but he's not saved at this
God-fearer, but he's not saved at this moment in time,
moment in time, right? So then if we go then to the
right? So then if we go then to the uh next verse it says about the 9inth
uh next verse it says about the 9inth hour of the day he saw clearly in a
hour of the day he saw clearly in a vision an angel of God come in and say
vision an angel of God come in and say to him Cornelius and he stared at him in
to him Cornelius and he stared at him in terror and said what is it Lord and he
terror and said what is it Lord and he said to him your prayers and your arms
said to him your prayers and your arms have been have ascended as a memorial
have been have ascended as a memorial before God. This is not a Christian but
before God. This is not a Christian but his prayers are ascending as a memorial
his prayers are ascending as a memorial to God.
to God. Hm. Now, you might say, "Oh, how do you
Hm. Now, you might say, "Oh, how do you know he wasn't saved, Ryan?" Well,
know he wasn't saved, Ryan?" Well, because literally Peter's going to go
because literally Peter's going to go and preach the gospel to him, and he's
and preach the gospel to him, and he's going to get saved. If you look in Acts
going to get saved. If you look in Acts 11, it tells us that as well. Let's see
11, it tells us that as well. Let's see if I can give you the exact verse, the
if I can give you the exact verse, the very next chapter,
very next chapter, it mentions,
it mentions, here we go, verse 13. And he told us how
here we go, verse 13. And he told us how he had seen the angel stand in his house
he had seen the angel stand in his house and say, "Send to Jopa and bring Simon
and say, "Send to Jopa and bring Simon who is called Peter. And he will declare
who is called Peter. And he will declare to you a message by which you will be
to you a message by which you will be saved, you and all your household."
saved, you and all your household." Notice a message that you'll be saved.
Notice a message that you'll be saved. So Cornelius was unsaved at the time
So Cornelius was unsaved at the time when God says his prayers have ascended
when God says his prayers have ascended as a memorial before him, but he was
as a memorial before him, but he was clearly part of the elect. The fact that
clearly part of the elect. The fact that he got saved is evidence of that. And so
he got saved is evidence of that. And so it seemed that God accepted his prayers
it seemed that God accepted his prayers even before he was saved.
even before he was saved. But if somebody is maybe not of the
But if somebody is maybe not of the elect, maybe it might mean that God just
elect, maybe it might mean that God just never ever accept their prayers.
never ever accept their prayers. That could be uh what interesting.
That could be uh what interesting. Cornelius did try to worship Peter.
Cornelius did try to worship Peter. That's true. That would the sinful
That's true. That would the sinful thing.
Uh, you've got I'm thinking of first Peter 1 Peter 3
I'm thinking of first Peter 1 Peter 3 12.
12. For the eyes of the Lord are on the
For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and his ears are open to their
righteous and his ears are open to their prayer. So we can know this for
prayer. So we can know this for believers Lord's ears are very open to
believers Lord's ears are very open to our prayers. For unbelievers it seems
our prayers. For unbelievers it seems that they're not as much unless maybe
that they're not as much unless maybe you're of the elect. So you will come to
you're of the elect. So you will come to faith in Jesus then God will be open to
faith in Jesus then God will be open to your prayers. But it's if you're a
your prayers. But it's if you're a believer that evidences that you are
believer that evidences that you are elect. And so definitely the Lord uh his
elect. And so definitely the Lord uh his ears are open to your prayers.
Yeah. Now I want to see did Samuel answer my question. Not sure if you guys
answer my question. Not sure if you guys saw it.
saw it. Let's have a look. Let's have a look.
Let's have a look. Let's have a look. It's not starred in the chat. So I'm not
It's not starred in the chat. So I'm not sure if one of our mods saw it.
sure if one of our mods saw it. Uh, did any of our mods see it? Um,
Uh, did any of our mods see it? Um, where I asked Samuel, are we justified
where I asked Samuel, are we justified by faith in Christ alone or we justified
by faith in Christ alone or we justified by baptism?
by baptism? What a baptism that is. How does
What a baptism that is. How does justification happen? So, let us know
justification happen? So, let us know Samuel and you should come for a viewer
Samuel and you should come for a viewer chat in a bit.
chat in a bit. Um, okay.
So, just uncheck this. Um, Operation Gayscale says, "Rina stated sins that
Gayscale says, "Rina stated sins that Catholic commits
Catholic commits mean that they aren't true believers.
mean that they aren't true believers. It's not about sins that they commit.
It's not about sins that they commit. It's that they that many Catholics trust
It's that they that many Catholics trust in their works to get them to heaven."
in their works to get them to heaven." Now, some Catholics who call themselves
Now, some Catholics who call themselves Catholics who who may trust in Christ
Catholics who who may trust in Christ alone and so therefore they're saved,
right? I'm not sure how you're linking this up
I'm not sure how you're linking this up with divorce and remarage, but you know,
with divorce and remarage, but you know, we love our Catholic friends and family
we love our Catholic friends and family and other people like that, but we just
and other people like that, but we just want them to depend on Jesus to get us
want them to depend on Jesus to get us to get them to heaven rather than works.
to get them to heaven rather than works. Here we go. Dan says he did not. Samuel,
Here we go. Dan says he did not. Samuel, where have you gone, bro? Where have you
where have you gone, bro? Where have you gone? Do you believe that justification
gone? Do you believe that justification happens by baptism
happens by baptism like the Roman Catholics believe or do
like the Roman Catholics believe or do you believe it happens by faith like how
you believe it happens by faith like how the Bible teaches and interestingly how
the Bible teaches and interestingly how many of the reformers taught
many of the reformers taught justification happens by faith not water
justification happens by faith not water baptism.
Um, cool. All right, these are great questions. We're going to do some Bible
questions. We're going to do some Bible trivia. Well, hopefully Samuel's going
trivia. Well, hopefully Samuel's going to respond to us. Um, but we'll see.
to respond to us. Um, but we'll see. Let's do now some Bible trivia with you.
Let's do now some Bible trivia with you. Bible trivia. Here we go. Test your
Bible trivia. Here we go. Test your knowledge. Let it show. Right here
knowledge. Let it show. Right here ongod.net.
ongod.net. Who can get it first? Are you ready yet?
>> Hey, I'm so excited. Look who's here today. Look who's here today doing some
today. Look who's here today doing some Bible trivia with us. We got Beck. She's
Bible trivia with us. We got Beck. She's like the only one in the stream. Where's
like the only one in the stream. Where's the rest of the team?
the rest of the team? >> I know. I was like, I better put my
>> I know. I was like, I better put my camera. Are they all disappearing?
camera. Are they all disappearing? Someone else is here.
Someone else is here. >> They're all busy.
>> They're all busy. Where's the rest? Maybe they're
Where's the rest? Maybe they're listening. Hey, look who's come in.
listening. Hey, look who's come in. Edson, good to have you here. Yes, Beck
Edson, good to have you here. Yes, Beck is here. World famous Beck. All right.
is here. World famous Beck. All right. Now,
Now, hey, have you got a suggestion, Beck,
hey, have you got a suggestion, Beck, for what? Um, trivia topic. Bible trivia
for what? Um, trivia topic. Bible trivia topic.
>> James says, "My son sitting beside said Bible trivia." Here we go.
Bible trivia." Here we go. Yeah. Well, sorry. Go for it, P.
Yeah. Well, sorry. Go for it, P. >> What about like animals in the Bible?
>> What about like animals in the Bible? >> Oh, animals in the Bible. What do you
>> Oh, animals in the Bible. What do you guys think about that? That sounds
guys think about that? That sounds interesting.
interesting. Hey, that to be good. Edson's like,
Hey, that to be good. Edson's like, "Yes, Revelation has got some animals,
"Yes, Revelation has got some animals, doesn't it?"
Oh, good. Let's do this. All right. What was the animal that spoke to Balum?
What was the animal that spoke to Balum? Was it a lion, a dove, a donkey, or a
Was it a lion, a dove, a donkey, or a goat?
goat? All right, go for it, Beck.
All right, go for it, Beck. >> A donkey.
>> A donkey. >> It was a donkey. What animal did Noah
>> It was a donkey. What animal did Noah send out of the ark first? Was it a
send out of the ark first? Was it a raven, a dove, a sparrow, or an eagle?
raven, a dove, a sparrow, or an eagle? Edson, what do you think?
Edson, what do you think? >> Raven.
>> Raven. It was a raven. Correct. And then he
It was a raven. Correct. And then he sent the dove after that. Next.
Whoa. That was someone in the jity room making
That was someone in the jity room making a lot of noise there. It looks like
a lot of noise there. It looks like someone. Who was that?
someone. Who was that? That was Paul. Oh, Paul. What you doing?
That was Paul. Oh, Paul. What you doing? >> That was a man trying to get your
>> That was a man trying to get your attention to put me on stage.
attention to put me on stage. >> I do that with the all the time.
>> I do that with the all the time. Okay. All right. Um, next one. Which
Okay. All right. Um, next one. Which animal did Jonah compare his life to
animal did Jonah compare his life to when he prayed inside the fish?
What do you think? Um, I'll give you options. Camel, serpent, ox,
options. Camel, serpent, ox, or
or fish. What do you think, Paul?
fish. What do you think, Paul? >> Well, it was in a fish. I don't know if
>> Well, it was in a fish. I don't know if he compared his life to the fish. So, I
he compared his life to the fish. So, I don't know. I'm a bit confused.
don't know. I'm a bit confused. >> Yeah, this is a tricky one. Uh, so does
>> Yeah, this is a tricky one. Uh, so does anyone remember this? Uh, let me see.
anyone remember this? Uh, let me see. Actually, don't think he did at all.
Actually, don't think he did at all. Yeah, I don't think that's a good
Yeah, I don't think that's a good question. So, we'll scrap that one.
question. So, we'll scrap that one. We'll scrap that one.
We'll scrap that one. I don't think he he talked about seaweed
I don't think he he talked about seaweed wrapping around his head, didn't he? He
wrapping around his head, didn't he? He talked about waters clothing it closing
talked about waters clothing it closing in. He thought he was in the belly of
in. He thought he was in the belly of Shol.
Shol. Yeah. So, maybe that's a trick question.
Yeah. So, maybe that's a trick question. Okay, we'll go to the next one. All
Okay, we'll go to the next one. All right, next.
right, next. What animal did Samson kill when he was
What animal did Samson kill when he was traveling to Timna? Was it a bear, a
traveling to Timna? Was it a bear, a lion, a wolf, or a wild ox?
lion, a wolf, or a wild ox? Okay, we'll give that one to you, Paul.
>> Um, was that a lion? >> The answer was a lion. Nice. The one
>> The answer was a lion. Nice. The one where you then found honey in it later
where you then found honey in it later on, didn't he?
on, didn't he? a beehive in there. Next one. What
a beehive in there. Next one. What animal did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on?
animal did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on? Was it a camel, a horse, a donkey, or a
Was it a camel, a horse, a donkey, or a mule? Edson, what do you think?
mule? Edson, what do you think? >> A donkey.
>> A donkey. >> Donkey. Now, what is Satan compared to
>> Donkey. Now, what is Satan compared to in the Bible in 1 Peter 5'8
in the Bible in 1 Peter 5'8 in that passage specifically? Is he a
in that passage specifically? Is he a serpent, a wild dog, a roaring lion, or
serpent, a wild dog, a roaring lion, or a jackal? What do you think, Beck?
a jackal? What do you think, Beck? >> A roaring lion?