Python's journey from a hobby project to a globally dominant programming language is a testament to its design philosophy of accessibility, its vibrant community, and its adaptability to evolving technological landscapes, particularly in data science and AI.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
Did you think Python was going to get popular from the beginning or?
[Music]
Python has contributed to making critical thinking a little more approachable by more people.
You can spend one to two hours,
learning programming fundamentals
and then you can write like 10 to 20 line of code
that do something interesting.
The language, the community, the ecosystem,
the market, the whole thing has had such an impact on humanity.
Today, I think it's safe to say that almost anywhere there's a computer,
there's probably some Python.
It's literally on Mars.
The impact of AI, I think we're still seeing what that's going to be.
Python is incredibly important for that.
To fully understand how Python got so big, we have to go back in time.
Maybe not that far back.
Everything started back in Amsterdam in the 80s
during my time at CWI, a Dutch research facility.
The CWI had been behind a lot of major programming language developments.
Algol 60 and Algol 68 for instance.
And Lambert Meertens had tried teaching programming to artists
and discovered things about
programming that are easy, if you're a scientist or a geek. But for somebody like an artist,
those things weren't obvious because you had to know something about the computer.
The cause of the frustration was the low level of the languages that were available.
The computers were immensely expensive and compared with that
a programmer was really really cheap
and so programming languages
were designed with that economic relationship in mind.
It didn't matter if it took a long time to
program as long as it didn't demand too much of the computer because that's where the cost was.
We looked at each other and said, can't we do a better job? Can't we design a language that is
easy to learn, easy to teach, but also easy to use.
So that beginners could understand how to program
without having to go into all those messy hardware details.
And that's how the ABC project was born.
One of the members of the team was Guido van Rossum.
[Music]
I was hired to work on ABC for which there was a small prototype but every
part of the prototype had to be expanded to fully working according to the spec.
In 1985, we made the release of ABC. And then we hit the problem: how to make the
world know that there was ABC?
We did not have a good way of reaching our intended audience.
The web did not exist.
Most people had never heard of a computer or even seen one.
If anybody wanted a copy, they had to send us a letter and we'd send them a floppy disc.
So I'm afraid ABC reached very few people and at some point the directors for reason, that
I still don't understand, killed that project.
I had spent, well, 3 and 1/2 years of hard work
on this language and the implementation to make it as as good as we could.
So it was disappointing.
[Music]
Guido was transferred to another project on a distributed operating system,
the amoeba system.
One of my jobs at that project as the programmer, not the researcher,
was to write, or help write, a large number of user applications.
And I didn't actually think
that for many of those utilities C was a very good language.
And I thought, well,
oh man, if we just could program ABC instead of C, each of those utilities would be like half a
page of code and I could write the entire suite of utilities in a couple of weeks instead of the
years that it looked like it was going to take us.
Except that ABC was so high and abstract,
it wasn't a good language to talk to servers and file systems and processes and it sort of
the whole operating system thing was abstracted away from ABC. So I thought, well, there really
ought to be a language that sort of bridges the gap between C and shell. And we looked at Perl and
we didn't think it was any good as a programming language. It was about as bad as as Basic,
although in different ways. So, Python was also in a part built as an alternative to Perl. That's
where I decided, oh well, I'm going to see if I can make my own programming language.
[Music]
One Christmas holiday, I believe, he decided to spend his time designing and building a
new programming language for the operating system based on the principles that he'd
learned while on the ABC project.
It was logical that I would start with ABC as an example.
The most prominent feature that Python borrowed from ABC is actually the use
of indentation for statement grouping. But it was also logical that I sort of dropped the
things from ABC that I didn't particularly like. That's how we ended up with Python.
Okay. I finally was confident enough of the interpreter was complete enough that
I showed it to Lambert. He showed me a language he had developed stealthily,
which he called Python, named after Monty Python. I said look what I made. It was
clear to me that it had some resemblance to ABC. The command line prompt is even
the same. So Lambert watched me type a few things and.. Guido was excited about it and he
apparently thought I would be excited as well. At some point he had seen enough and he said,
"Can I try something?" And he types one very short line of code and it crashes the interpreter.
And he knew that that it would. The point escaped me. I didn't know why he thought
this was better than ABC and why he had done this whole project. I went back and
the next day I had a fix for it. But it was a pretty crushing experience to be honest.
It must have been at least half a year later, that I first got acquainted with
Python. So this is the office where Guido and I were holed up when he created Python.
There were two important users. Sjoerd was one of them and the other was Jack Jansen.
Guido was sitting over there and I was sitting over there. If you want to prototype a program,
you sort of write the outlines of the program, but it doesn't actually work. When you do this
in Python, it actually works. It's readable. It's very easy to program and the indentation
is totally natural as far as I'm concerned anyway. Sjoerd and Jack were the most active
in using Python. You find bugs, you find the things that you want to extend and then telling
me about it because all they had to do was say, "Hey, Guido." It was the first real interactive
systems programming language. So, you could just sit and write and run it immediately without any
compilation. So, it was much more fun to use than the old programming languages, but slower.
I think it was mostly Jack's idea in the end, while we all worked on it,
to make an open-source release. CWI allowed Guido to distribute Python to the world as
long as its copyright notice was there. They would have held back if they had known it
would be such an incredible success, which is good that they didn't know. Nobody knew.
I didn't either. Because if they had held back, it would never have become an incredible success.
Then we had to actually physically do the release which turned out to be an
incredible pain because Usenet was the only thing we had to release it.
Usenet was a network of, you could say, bulletin boards. People would write messages. They would
get distributed over the world and then there were the groups for all the different computer
languages. Usenet had a very strict limit on the size of a single post. First put your entire
source tree in a tarball. Then compress it and you have to do another step where you turn the binary
data into ASCII encoding. So you have this huge file with gobblygook, but it's at least printable
gobblygook. And then you apply another tool that snips it into pieces. Then there is a script where
if you have downloaded all 21 parts, you can undo all those operations in reverse. That was
what people put up with. So we did all the work on our side and plenty of people did all the work on
their side to unpack this because I had apparently written a very good teaser about what this was.
[Music] Very quickly I started getting feedback via email or Usenet from people who had done
something exciting with it or who had found a bug and that just kept coming.
We worked at Johnson Space Center. So our interest was putting together flight simulations and tools
for the design engineers that would be used for the shuttle program at the time. I remember
needing a scripting language to control a C++ library project we were working on at the time.
Not too long into that search, I found Guido's Python distribution at CWI. I was able to FTP
that down, unpack it, compile it, and run it in a matter of 10 minutes or so. That was my first
impressive experience with Python. 20 years ago, a computer that cost a million dollars and filled an
entire room had less capability than an 11 pounds desktop computer today. With costs going down and
capabilities going up, the computer has entered our lives quickly and unobtrusively. There were
lots of things changing in a major way that made computing particularly exciting to be in. At that
time, computers suddenly were coming out of the machine room and landing up on your desk. And
then of course the web happened. Then it all exploded. After the internet came to Europe,
it was much easier for software to be distributed. Python very slowly took off. Then there was
a growing Python community which was very supportive like a big family you could almost say.
Part of the benefit of this is that I don't.. I'm like, there's no strain on my body at all.
I was working on developing a kind of distributed equipment database and a colleague at the lab,
Michael McLay, knew that I was looking for what was called a scripting language that was
also sophisticated that would enable you to build substantial things and not get bogged down in the
ragged edges. Scripting languages were designed to glue things together, to connect things that
already worked, that already existed. Immediately on trying it, I was just amazed and thought this
can't be as good as it is. And it was. Mike was interested in bringing Guido over and Guido was
interested in coming over. 99% of the people that I got in touch with were in the United States.
So Guido ended up coming and then Mike and Guido and I wanted to arrange a workshop so people who
were interested in Python could gather and talk about what they were working on and what they
felt was needed. This is the t-shirt for the first conference. And so this yeah that that was just
sort of flowy writing and on the on the back it gave the date of the conference. Spam, spam, spam,
spam. It's such a fantastic song. That workshop really is for me the beginning of the Python
community. November 1994, Gaithersburg, Maryland in this windowless government office building at
NIST. That was a great experience. It was about two days. We had 20 people. I still have the
t-shirt from that workshop. There was just kind of this feel of, hey, there's something happening.
This will be fun to hang out with the people that I chat with online, to actually see Guido
in person and actually make decisions. And we knew that if you impressed him with the feature and it
was an easy thing to install, he would add it to the language right there so that we can at least
try it out in beta form. There was like a whole room of people who knew what you were talking
about because they had all studied Python deeply or almost all. One of the people was Barry Warsaw.
[Music] Around 1994, I joined a company, CNRI, Corporation for National Research Initiatives,
and we were building these software agents, little programs that can move around to
different computers on a network, and they pickle themselves up and move around to another place and
reconstitute themselves and do some more work. A friend of mine from NIST sent me an email and
said, "Hey, we've got this guy coming over from the Netherlands and he's going to talk about his
language. Do you want to come?" And so we went to the workshop and just absolutely fell in love
with of course Python and of course Guido. Even then, it had the feeling that there was a there
there was something that was going to happen that there was potential. I remember coming
back to CNRI saying, "Oh, this is great. we're going to use Python for sure in our project. And
one of our colleagues at CNRI said, "Well, what do you think? Why don't we just hire Guido?"
CNRI was set up to sort of promote information infrastructure and foster research, help build
pilot projects, take the results and put them out into the public so that others
could then leverage it. Part of CNRI's mission was to cultivate internet based things. That's
why our name Corporation for National Research Initiatives has the word "initiatives" in there.
We had a need for a language that would be easier for people to deal with than any other traditional
languages that were around at the time. I ran across a photograph. There was a party at CNRI,
years ago. It was probably I think 1996. And it's it's a Guido. Yeah. I used to say
Guido. Many people say Guido, but I said Guido and I'm sure I don't pronounce it right. Oh,
he was a very stylish person and he was a very strong fellow. Got introduced to him and it just
seemed like it was a good fit and so I made the job offer. For me, it was fantastic. There is no
doubt about that. One of the things he insists on if you want to get him to work for you is that he
has some fraction of his time, preferably as much as halftime if not more, to work on the language
itself. the fact that they could work full-time on Python because it turned out that the Knowbots
project was almost more an excuse to to hire me than I did much for that. I kind of feel
like our work on Python was a little subversive. You know, we tended to spend a lot more time on
Python than maybe we should have. I went to CNRI and since I had been a systems person,
I was responsible for setting up python.org. We should have also grabbed python.com even though
we didn't think of Python as a commercial enterprise because someone else got it and
uh used it to host a stupid porn site. For years we had to warn people go to python.org, not .com.
It really was the perfect home, I think, for doing all of that early Python development - and develop
a lot of the infrastructure around Python. We had a meeting discussing making some kind of user
group or software organization where the Python software activity was proposed. We need a little
bit of governance, a little bit of organization, but we don't want too much because I don't think
any of us really liked bureaucracy. And then the question came up about what we should call Guido
as part of that. I think it was me who suggested that Guido be called the Benevolent Dictator and
then Barry suggested Benevolent Dictator for Life and that became an internet meme or actually a
software meme. Benevolent Dictator for Life was.. you can find it on Wikipedia. Ultimately, you
know, Guido was the inventor of the language and the final decider about yes, this is going to make
it in or this is not going to make it in. I think I developed my own style during those first years.
All ideas are welcome, but I will choose which ideas I believe are right to add to the language.
There's dozens and dozens of aspects of Python today where somebody had a vision for,
if you just add this to Python, look at all these amazing things that I can do.
[Music]
I'm one of the many people that came to Python, not as a programmer, but as a scientist. Python
wasn't the first language I used for science. I was doing satellite data processing and I used
Perl to do it and then a year later I would come back and try to figure out what I'd done and I
had no idea. Python had the opposite experience. I first started using Python in 1997. I just used it
to do some scripting, do some data processing with some medical imaging data and I was like this is
nice. This is pretty cool. A year later, so 1998, I came back to look at the code I'd written and I
could read it. I understood what I did. And that was kind of for me the convincing data that said,
"Oh, I need to dig in on this language." And there were a few really key people at
that time who were publishing or talking about how to use Python for science. Not very many,
but a few. Konrad Hinsen was one of them, I remember, and David Ascher and Jim Hugunin.
There's been a number of stages in the life cycle of Python, when it just grew from a a core
language capability to a platform with a number of different specialty modules and packages that made
it very very useful for certain user communities. The first one was probably the numeric community,
the science and engineering folks that wanted high performance matrix operations to be done.
Even though Guido wasn't a scientist himself, wasn't necessarily deeply concerned with the
same things that we were concerned with as scientists, he was open to the suggestions.
I think one of the things that people don't appreciate about the Python language as much
now that it's so popular and mainstream is how important it was that Guido was
open to new ideas and open to the needs of people who are not traditional programmers.
I think he had a very clear-eyed quiet focus on understanding some things about the future
that he built into the language. It was uniquely suited to its environment. One of the reasons I
used Python and I think a lot of people used Python at the time is that in the early 2000s,
the world was almost divided into here's an open source ecosystem or you can go and use
Java which is actually a paid thing. I was using MATLAB. I really didn't like
the fact that when I wrote code and I wanted to share that code with others,
I was essentially telling people they had to go buy a license for a software package before they
could even look at my or use my code. You know, these are the days where you have to
like buy the developer tools or spend a couple hundred bucks to get Visual Studio 6.0 and then
Python and then all of these libraries were open source and then could be adapted, could be used
in a commercial project. I was sort of early on convinced by community members that Python
being open- source and the particular way it was open source was very important so that people
would feel comfortable using Python to make great things that they would then be able to to sell.
[Music] In 1998, Blender was published on the internet. The software was free and
then you could buy some things around it. We were restricted to use open source. So,
you didn't have a lot of options. We were doing a call on our website like what is the most popular
scripting language that we should add in Blender? Perl was really big and Python was upcoming and
there were some others. And it was interesting to see that everybody who was advising us to
use Perl as scripting language but they only advertised how great Perl is. And the people
who came more from the Python background who said well I think Python is a better choice.
They came with a balanced opinion. And they said okay Perl will give you this and this
and this and Python will give you other things and balancing all of it I would recommend you to
do Python and only for that reason I picked Python just because the people were nicer.
It was honestly just a lot of enthusiasts. It was a lot of people who just enjoyed the language,
enjoyed the people involved with the language and it would just happen
to be typically motivating enough for people to want to help out. Ultimately,
there's a sense of fun that comes across and Guido coded that into the name of the
language influenced by Monty Python. It creates a sense of community to have your little jokes.
Tim Peters is a famous early example of blending both like the aesthetics of Python and humor. Tim
Peters was this mythical feature.. creature in the world of Python, and no one had met him. He
was out there in the ether as a wise one to give us advice on what to do with numerical processing.
Steve Majewski sent me some email telling me about Python. So I started a email correspondence with
Guido about the language and about the design and I got some of the pre-release code and played
with it and talked to him about design decisions and liked it very much. Tim Peters was a Python
contributor and community member and mentor to me from very early on. Tim was a channeler
of Guido. He had a really unique way of saying: I think Guido's going to like this or I don't think
Guido is going to like that. There's a poem called the Zen of Python which is a partially humorous,
partially serious poem about the the aesthetics of of Python. I'm actually looking at the Usenet post
where Tim posted his first version of the Zen of Python, although he called it the Way of Python.
And it was in response to some discussion where people were complaining that they
didn't understand what was Python's philosophy. They couldn't figure me out. And Tim had figured
me out and he put it basically in poetry. Here is the Way of Python by Tim Peters from 1999.
Beautiful is better than ugly. Duh. Explicit is better than implicit. Simple is better than
complex. Complex is better than complicated. And I love that distinction. Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense. Readability counts. I will say it counts for a lot. Special cases aren't
special enough to break the rules. Although practicality beats purity. Errors should never
pass silently unless explicitly silenced. In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
I did not follow that in a very key piece of NumPy and it's still a mess. There should be one and
preferably only one obvious way to do it. That's a direct reference to Perl's motto of there's
more than one way to do it by the way. Although that may not be obvious at first, unless you're
Dutch. Now is better than never. Although never is often better than right now. If the implementation
is hard to explain, it's a bad idea. That's a really good one. If the implementation is easy
to explain, it may be a good idea. Name spaces are one honking great idea. Let's do more of
those. This is so Tim. Normally 'import this', imports some useful library, which is very serious
business. Having an 'import this' that was just a joke was a bit of lightness that we liked to
add. This is from a small hobbyist community, right? Because if you're a corporate behemoth
making a a programming language, like someone's probably going to tell you that you can't put a
silly poem in your in your programming language, but Python's just made by dogs on the internet,
so they can put poems in their software. [Music] The different ways to make money on the internet
are just beginning to emerge. Entrepreneurs are putting their faith in a new medium to deliver
the big payoff. It's the dot-com bubble, all this money pumping into Silicon Valley software
and internet stuff. Early 2000, I decided to leave CNRI and with a few co-workers joined
little startup named BeOpen. While CNRI, I think, was an amazing home for Python in the early days,
everything changes and everything evolves and thinking, well if we're going to strike out on our
own this is probably the right time to do that. That didn't work out. I'd say within maybe a year
or something. BeOpen was completely incompetent. We spent the summer in blissful ignorance working
full-time on Python. We built and released Python 2 and within 5 months it was over. We were paid
our salaries every 2 weeks, and then suddenly in late October we weren't. [Music] It was a moment
where the [ __ ] could have hit the fan. If all the Python guys went their separate ways... Python
wasn't big enough to survive that at the time. That was when I had a company Digital Creations
that later became Zope, which is an application server, database server, index server, web server,
etc. Very large scale commercial quality application written in Python. And if Python died,
you know who else would die? We'd die. The whole platform was built on Python. So they were Python
experts. We need to go and make sure that Python is secure for the future and that the team stays
together. So we negotiated an agreement with them to join my company. That was an incredibly lucky
rescue. We felt like we really trusted them and we believed in what they were doing and
what they wanted to do with Python and for Python. This is a place that I'm proud of. In hindsight,
it was a really critical point in Python's life. I think if we had chosen wrong or tried to say,
"Oh, well, we'll just strike out on our own anyway." You never know. But I'm not
so sure that Python would have survived that juncture in its life. Yeah. [Music]
Python just kept sort of growing and the community kept self-organizing.
One of the I think underlying themes of Python, if you take it in its totality, is this sense of
grassroots movements. Things grow from the bottom up and evolve to the point where everybody sort of
realizes, oh, we need a little bit more structure. Oh, the Python Software Foundation. In my opinion,
the PSF, that damn thing was a success from day one. That came out of one of the concerns we had
had with BeOpen actually. So CNRI had written a license for Python and put its name on it and
BeOpen had copied a version of that license and put the BeOpen name on it. There was a
concern that at some point I might accidentally end up working for a company that tried to grab
ownership of Python. We realized that we really need an organization that will be independent,
will not be beholden to any company and their whims and their lawyers and will really keep
Python users as their first and foremost customer, so to speak, in mind. [Music] And then the magic
happened when we got into PyCon, which is maybe the third stool of the miracle of Python. [Music]
What has been your take away from PyCon US this year? It feels like people are still willing to
go do hard things, work on things together, you know. Wow. They still do have the passion to be
honest. So, what was it for you? Uh, for me most definitely like meeting people I haven't met in
a while. That's cool. Yeah. And just pretty much hanging out with them. You try to walk,
Yeah, to the other side. There's like 10 people that you want to see in between like
stop. I want to talk to you. Oh, I know. Pablo and Yuri presented as bananas and then Lukasz
asked the question dressed as a banana. And then Guido came in just as a banana
as well. Thank you for what you do for the PSF. Please don't step down. Just keep doing
it forever. Raise your hand if you love the web. Just raise your hand. Raise your hand
if you have done React front-ends. Raise your hand if you would like to come back. To React?
No, come back to Python. All right. Good. For the record, 100%. I begged my mother to take
me to PyCon and I met all my online heroes. He was this distant Benevolent Dictator for life
who I'd been talking to over the internet, but here he was in person and so I was thrilled to
be able to finally meet him. Then I think everyone was aware that he was
a 15-year-old kid on the other end of the terminal. When PyCon was held in Montreal,
the organizer asked me if I'd be willing to give an opening address to the conference. Well,
I'm a slightly fast talker and I had some spare time and I just used it as an opportunity to say
thank you. "I like to think of it as I came for the language, but I stayed for the community. So,
I want to personally thank all of you for making this such a wonderful place to be
and such a wonderful group of people to be around. So, thank you". Luckily, it came
off well because people still quote it. I think it kind of speaks to the core ethos of Python.
We try to develop this tool that people can use for their needs to get their work done. But the
community is the true strength of Python. It's not just the language, right? It's the people.
[Music] It was steadily growing every single year. It was getting more and more downloads,
more and more people making use of it. It became a more sophisticated language that was
fit for purpose for this new emerging programming paradigm where the the web itself is the platform.
He told me an interesting number that that made me realize that the Python user community was already
much bigger than I had estimated because he said, "Guido, you don't know the sales
numbers for Python books, but I am Tim O'Reilly. I published the two most important ones and I do
know the sales numbers and they are fantastic." I don't know if he had that much enthusiasm in
his voice then, but he was sharing this new to me important fact which made me realize,
oh my gosh! Python tends to get spikes when certain specialties, I guess you could say,
pick the language up and decide that this is a thing that they want to use in their area.
Everybody wanted to to do things with the worldwide web and Python actually became
a really powerful platform for for doing not just web pages but web servers and services and
suddenly we had an increase of people coming in from the web world. [Music] I think Dropbox was
one of the early companies to start building in Python and reaching millions of users.
My name's Drew and I'll be showing you a quick tour of Dropbox, which is a new way to store and
share files online. Python had been largely viewed as scripting language you run on the back end or
maybe in an academic setting or in a scientific setting, but not really for like production
desktop software that you ship to millions of people. But I just started writing in Python
and hoping that none of the roadblocks would completely blow me up. You can develop programs
much faster in Python because it's a higher level language and it's a very clean easy language and
so we could we could be a lot more competitive than other companies who were writing with Java
or C++ or Perl. Even back then we were competing against the Google's and Microsofts of the world
and you know our odds didn't seem very good. So we needed all the help we can get. Google had this
big team like a hundred people, C++ programmers, trying to do a video hosting site and they could
never keep up with this little thing over there called YouTube and they went and looked and it was
just a couple of people writing Python. Python ended up being a big force multiplier on our
effort and no other language that we considered had anything close to that kind of capability.
[Music]
The fact that data science suddenly became a thing that you had to do,
combined with the fact that Python was sort of well positioned to do data science stuff
meant a huge amount of new Python users flowed in.
What was starting to happen in the 2009-2010 time frame, we were seeing more and more of
our consulting deals tied to using Python not as really a replacement for MATLAB or engineering
type things, but using Python for doing data processing. We didn't call it data science at the
time, but it was that kind of work, right? It was modeling, predictive analytics, things like that.
This is the time of Hadoop, the time of big data, the time of Spark, and people were doing Java at
scale. We were starting to do much more consulting work in the financial industry and we'd walk into
these large very well-capitalized firms and they were using Python to do business data processing.
I realized okay if it's a research group over here doing some science research and they don't
have money and they use an open source thing I get it but if you have JP Morgan right which
has a lot of money and they're picking up and using these scientific tools and they're loving
it. I realized that we didn't just have a cheap free alternative. We actually had something that
was innovative and that was doing something fairly unique. Peter and I ended up leaving Enthought and
starting another company. We started as Continuum Analytics actually and its vision was to scale
NumPy and Pandas to large data sets and large clusters. We quickly ran into a simple problem,
very quickly in, but a very annoying problem. Yes. people just couldn't even install the
software needed to run all this Python stuff. The thing about the Python scientific and data stack
is that all of these different libraries, they're very different than the web development libraries
because these data libraries are often backed by a very large amount of complex C++, Fortran,
other kinds of software modules. And to build those correctly takes some work. To build them
correctly on every operating system takes even more work. And then to build them so that they
can actually be connected together, that requires you to have this entire build system rationalized.
And so the very first thing we did was like make a distribution of Python to make it easy to get
that installed. A lot of the data science Python people, they didn't even use normal Python. They
used this Anaconda Python distribution. Sort of a dumb joke that I came up with at one point.
It was basically Python for big data. So it's a big snake. So Anaconda. After like a few years,
we kept going to conferences and going to places and people wouldn't know who we
were. But the instant that we mentioned that we make Anaconda, they would say, "Oh, yeah,
of course. I love Anaconda. I use it all the time." Right? So, after that happened like the
thousandth time, we said, "Okay, maybe we should rename the company Anaconda." Data engineering
became a discipline where Python was incredibly entrenched. It was Python and R. And over time,
Python's data analysis libraries caught up and plotting libraries and stuff started to catch up
to what R had. And then people realized, oh well, with Python, I can work end to end with my data
versus R being very good at data analysis, but not necessarily like the data collection stage
and various other stages. I remember going to a Python conference at one point. I was like,
there's so many sciency people here like where are all the web developers? This is all data data
pipelines and stuff. I don't want to be immodest about this because it was a collective effort for
the whole community, but I think that what we did at Anaconda, not only making the software
installer that made it one click for people to just run, but also shephering the conferences
and building that community and and whatnot was really critical. They were incredibly
important contributions. I think we actually made Python super popular. I I think we did. [Music]
Well, I remember hearing from a friend of mine that Guido van Rossum was just working
at Google. And that when I thought about it, I'm like, wait, yeah, Guido, I guess,
works at a normal company and I can't remember the exact circumstances, but I think either
I got an introduction to him or I just maybe I think maybe just send him an email saying, "Hey,
um, big fan of your work." you know, it's like fan mail basically. And he responded and we got lunch.
I mean, he's a hero of mine and he was totally friendly and approachable. And at that talk,
it was revealed that Dropbox was entirely written in Python, both the client and the server,
and that was exciting. He was interested in what we were doing with Python. And I think
we were stretching the language and the runtime in interesting ways. He approached me again and said,
"Hey, we would really like you to work for us." And then to my surprise and delight, he ended up
joining the Dropbox team, which was super exciting for all of us. I stayed there for 7 years. We did
more important stuff for Python than I did during 7 years at Google I think. I think he had a big
impact on the rest of the team. You know, here's someone who's one of the icons of computing,
but you would never know it just from his, you know, how he badges in to the office every day
and I think set a really great example in terms of being super humble and curious and friendly.
You know, it's hard for me to think of someone who has had more impact with lower ego. Uh,
let's start with the first Python license plate. Sorry, that was my car when we lived in
Virginia. And there was a box on the application - sorry, just grabbing the other one, too - uh,
do you want a custom license plate? So, I managed to get Python in Virginia and in California,
Python was long taken. Like someone in Silicon Valley probably has a Python license plate
somewhere. So, the best I could get was PY3K, which I thought was pretty pretty cute anyway.
It became ever more popular and people started thinking about flaws in the
language. There were a lot of ideas floating around the core development community,
changes you could make to the language that people thought would be major improvements.
The only problem with them was that they would break old Python code that currently existed.
Some of that probably got away from us a little bit in hindsight.
We released Python 3.0 in December of 2007. I remember because I was actually
interning under Guido at the time. We were giving people roughly 5 years, I think,
to do the transition. And everyone thought that was just extraordinarily generous. The
world would totally be on Python 3 in just a few years. This is best for the language long term.
We're going to make these changes. The community has always come along with us. We think they'll
come along this journey as well. We were very naive about that and they they made us know it.
The community said, "No, not worth it. Kill it. Don't do it. It's not
going to work." This included some very notable individuals in the community.
So, please welcome our next speaker.
Hi, my name is Armin. You might be familiar with some of the Python libraries that I wrote and
you might even maybe use some of them. The Python 2 to Python 3 transition. Initially,
it happened very gradually over many years. There was the version that everybody used and there was
sort of the version on the side that was built that nobody used. People didn't want to put in the
effort because their code worked, you know, why rewrite it. It's very hard to mix Python 2 and 3.
It's uh it's a it's a headache. So I just didn't move and a lot
of people didn't move. It felt there's a likelihood that it will not go anywhere.
It felt much more like a top-down decision than any of the things in the past. And that top- down
decision, I think for some people felt like it was not inclusive of the real pains of people who
had a long tale of use cases. I think I severely underestimated how successful Python already was.
How many people had written so much code in Python 2 that it would be hard for them to
sort of put the effort into translate to Python 3. I thought the most controversial thing by far
was that we wanted to change the way Unicode was handled. A way to say these things are
strings and they're human consumable. They're words that people want to read and write and
these things are bytes. These are things that computers want to read and write.
We basically made all strings Unicode and we made you use a new prefix 'b' for bytes. And this was
incredibly disturbing. I was implementing a WSGI library at the time and one of the
things that you do when you implement WSGI, is that you have to parse HTTP data. You have
to parse cookie data. And there there was always a mixture of bytes and Unicode. And
it was very easy to work with on Python 2. And it was incredibly annoying to work on Python 3,
at least initially. There really wasn't a way to convert your Python 2 code to
Python 3. The tools didn't exist. I started writing blog posts about it.
Why I think that in the way which Python 3 works right now, I just cannot see the move.
He was a valued community member. And at the time I was actually quite surprised
that he was so viciously attacking Python 3. I was probably even more negative on it
than appropriate. But Python had such a good run and I put so much energy into it. I was
part of like building out web frameworks and and all these libraries. I felt like:
why are we ruining all of this with this move that didn't even have that many benefits.
I had not appreciated how many people already had enormous code bases or were on their way
to building up enormous code bases. The payback for that was that I had to initiate the project
at Dropbox. We had a pretty long road to migrate many millions of lines of Python 2 code. 5 million
lines of code in the server alone and another million for the client. That is a very large
pile of code to transform. And so we had to invent ways of sort of doing it in in pieces.
[Laughter]
A funny sticker I found in my pocket. There's a built tool called Bazel.
It's sort of a frozen version of Python 2. So here the sticker says
after re-education enemy of the people Python denounced their bourgeois class,
renounced formalist notions like Turing incompleteness and began a new life as
citizen Starlark. This is especially an example of Benjamin Peterson's humor.
I had the fortune or the misfortune depending how you see it to be the uh Python 2.7 release manager
for an entire decade. We had to adjust our plans for Python 3 and for Python 2 so that there was
a longer series of releases where there were both new Python 2 versions and new Python 3 versions.
What ended up happening is then the community was like maintaining 2 and 3 and that created a lot
of burden. And so this was happening all during the growth of NumPy. We made it work for Python
2 and then I think Python 3.1 I think or 3.2, we also made it work there but saw no adoption.
We knew it was going to take a long time. Uh we knew it was going to be painful but
there is light at the end of the tunnel. The community contributed stuff like lib2to3 and
other migration tools came out. Benjamin Peterson wrote Six that really helped that transition. The
language itself became a little more backwards compatible. I eventually advocated to bring
back the 'u' prefix on the strings and that actually made it easier to write unified code
bases that target both Python 2 and Python 3. There was a point in time where we made
a very strong declaration, there will never be a Python 2.8 and Python 3 is the future.
Python 3 just is a better language and it is getting better over time. Python 2 on
the other hand is a fine language and it will remain exactly what it is. For a long time,
there was a lot of measurement of how much Python 2 usage is there, how much Python 3
usage is there. I think it was when Python was in Portland, was roughly when we started to see like
50/50. Once 3.4 came out, it actually added some features that were interesting to people like, oh,
I want that capability. So, to me, Python 3.4 was really Python 3.0. And then 3.5 was an even bigger
milestone. That was the one that got widespread adoption of Python 3. And by the time Python 3.5
came out, then it was clear that Python 3 would work. And then you started to have companies come
out and give talks like Instagram's talk, which I believe is also at Portland, was a big deal.
Yes, you heard it right. Instagram has been running fully on Python 3 for a few months.
The whole process took I would say about 9 to 10 months. And I think Instagram was the largest
production deployment for Python at the time. She gave a very good, very thorough talk explaining
why they did it. Two main things: typing and asyncio. How they did it. We cleaned out all
the libraries that are not making the migration from Python 2 to 3. How you should do it. Unit
test. What they had learned during the process. We had actually some good performance gains as well,
after our migration. It felt as vindication that at least there were large companies that
took the time to do it right and to convert all their code to Python 3 and were able to do it
successfully. It was definitely well received. We got a lot of people saying: we really wanted
to migrate as well, but we weren't getting the kind of support that my team or my company was
giving us. And now I can bring this back to my management. And that really gave people
the confidence in migrating to Python 3. It became like a look, Instagram can do it. Why don't you
do it? Instagram's getting benefits, new features, faster code. Why don't you also want that benefit?
[Music]
Projects undergo things like this. And Python learned a lot from it and it did actually
eventually end up with Python 3 being in a pretty good spot again that it was safe to use. And safe
to use sounds weird but like where I felt like I can actually start new projects on Python 3 now
because we're back to a stable situation where you're about as productive as I felt like I was
with Python 2. Hi, Anna, nice to meet you. I really liked your talk. But it was basically
time that healed it. When Python 2.7 was declared that there wouldn't be any more security fixes,
it became a security concern. That was sort of the final push. People who donated their
work to do this migration in the wider Python world and community eventually got the world
running on Python 3, but as I said like it was a decade long process. And I don't think
anybody anticipated how much work it would be to move to Python 3. I think Python's probably
too big to ever go through a transition like that today. The community was maybe a little too big,
but not too big. I even still get angry messages sometimes from people who are like,
"My code needs Python 2.7. You need to provide it." And I tell them, "No." I
never wavered in my commitment to Python 3. It was a lesson learned for sure. For a long time,
I regularly joked there would be a Python 4, but the transition would be handled much better than
the transition to Python 3. I felt I owed that to the community. And now, the mantra has changed
to there will never be even a Python 4. To be honest, I don't know how many people in Python
even know about the whole transition because that all ended in 2020. At least it's behind us.
[Music]
Okay, so now we get in the closet. So there's the frisbee. This is the most unique merch I've
ever seen related to Python. Now, here's a significant t-shirt. It says, "Python is
for girls." I received this anonymously in the mail at Google. And to this day,
I don't know exactly what the intention of the sender was. They never revealed themselves,
at least not to me. And I don't know if there was an intention even.. But I sort
of realized at that point that there wasn't a whole lot of women in the the Python community
and the community also discovered that and fixed it for the Python conference.
This idea of being a place where people from a wide range of backgrounds can learn how to
program, benefit from programming, find community. There really was some snowballing adoption of
these ideas across languages at the time. Jessica McKellar looks at the speakers at PyCon and says,
"There's only 3% that are women. What can we do about this?" She was co-organizer of the
biggest Python meetup in the world in Boston. She knew what she was talking about. It's not
rocket science. It's like, ask people if they're interested in speaking and we just.. providing
like a little bit of support drove a huge shift in the volume and demographics of the talks that were
submitted. And then 3 years later, like 35% of the speakers are women. I forget what the number
was but I think it was almost even with male speakers. PyCon... I had an old tweet about this,
so I just pulled this up. Says, "Hello from your PyCon Diversity Chair." So, the percentage of
PyCon talks by women: 2011 was 1%, 2012, it was 7%, 2013, 15%, 2014 and 2015, 33%. And in 2016,
40%. Problems have solutions. That was a very inspiring story to me also. Something that was
less inspiring to me was that at the language summit there wasn't a single woman in the room,
and I don't believe we have a single female committer to core Python. There wasn't ever
ill intent but unfortunately we fell into the trap of not doing enough diversity
reach out to try to get more people to come in. To be honest it was a lot of
white men. So Guido wanted to change that. I want at least two female core Python devs
in the next year and I will try to train them myself if that's what it takes. So
come talk to me. I believe one of the first people who took up that call was Mariatta.
[Music] Even though I've always been passionate about technology and programming,
I also felt it wasn't a welcoming environment for women. My schoolmates who took computer science
are mostly men. Most of the professors were men and at work most of my co-workers were men and I
just didn't really have examples or role models of women being successful in the tech industry.
One of my co-workers went to PyCon. He saw that at that conference there is
this community called PyLadies and I felt like.. I want to meet them.
[Music]
So in 2015, that's when I decided I want to go to PyCon. At this conference,
I got to see a lot of women speaking and presenting. At my previous tech conference,
all speakers were men, all the keynote speakers were men. So this was really different.
One of the keynote speakers at that same conference was Guido van Rossum. Hello
everybody. Glad to see you all. I want to meet and see the creator of the Python programming
language. "And I will try to train them myself if that's what it takes". I heard
this speech. However, at that time, I just didn't think that it's something
I could do. I wasn't even contributing to the Python community. I didn't contribute
to open source at all. I just thought I'm sure they will find women next year.
The year after I went back to PyCon US and Guido van Rossum gave another keynote. We still don't
have two female core developers. I think at that time that's something really clicked in me,
like I realized that there's something within me that says: if nobody's doing it,
I will do it. I wrote to Guido van Rossum and I asked him for help.
Somehow I felt really scared. I just didn't feel like I deserved mentorship from Guido
van Rossum. So I really hesitated to send this email to him. But in the end, I realized that I
want to try. Like I felt like this was a great opportunity for me. I pressed the send button.
I got a reply. He was very friendly. He started sharing resources about, you know, how to get
started contributing to Python. He offered to do video chats. It's been really helpful to have
his moral support. We had a pretty sort of deep mentorship relationship for a few years. Mariatta
learned the process from Guido and continued to contribute more and more very much around tooling,
like she really found her niche in terms of trying to help make our development process easier.
It was scary at first, like I just didn't feel comfortable sharing my questions in public. I
didn't want people to know that I don't know how to do certain things, you know,
like I didn't want people to see that I'm actually not that good. But this is how it it works in open
source. And the community has always been kind and helped me with my questions without saying
that you're stupid. Like I never felt like I was being judged. I think it does start with Guido.
The fact that Guido was very active in bringing more voices into Python absolutely made Python
better and stronger. Just the way the whole community works and what we stand for,
thanks to Guido's leadership, is where I want to be. And I think that's true for a lot of people.
About six, seven months after I started reaching out to Guido,
I was recommended to become a Python core developer. It really wasn't until
4 months ago that for the first time ever. There's a woman...
There's a woman who became a Python core developer and earned that commit privilege. The first woman
ever to join our team and has continued to be there and participate and try to help us and
always a very good advocate to try to improve our diversity. Now that I've seen the camera,
I can't do it. My life really changed after that. A lot of opportunities opened up just
because I'm a Python core developer. Hi, how are you? [Music] Mariatta went on to give her own set
of talks about how important mentorship is. When you don't have role models who you can relate to,
you start believing that you cannot do it. Thank you. Hi everybody. Uh my name is Mariatta. I'm
a PyLady. I run PyLadies Vancouver. I also help with the PyLadies con. 10 years ago,
I was also in this room for the Pyladies luncheon at PyCon US 2015.
It was a life-changing event for me. It was at that event that I felt for the first time in
my life as a developer, I felt like I belong in tech because I see 100 women in the room with me.
I just want other women to have role models. I hope I can help inspire them and help them.
These opportunities belong to you, too. You're all the reason I do this because I know there's
still a lot to do and I know together we can help each other and support each other. Okay,
I think that's it. Thank you so much everybody. [Applause] I have been so consistently impressed
by the Python community's ability to have respectful and and real reflection and
dialogue about how to steward itself and how to move it forward in a way that I find so inspiring
and a vision of what is possible in other communities. And I mean that really sincerely.
There were an ever growing number of sort of scientific disciplines where all the code was
written in Python or a lot of it was prototyped in Python at least. And then the next step was
machine learning packages which started with TensorFlow and was later followed by PyTorch.
For a long time, Python was seen sort of as a scripting language that you would just do
small things that you need to automate and not production ready code and so it wasn't given a
ton of attention. And then now AI/ML has sort of changed things where it is now a business driver.
It appeals to people who are not professional programmers but need software to do a task.
There are some other languages like Rm you can do some interesting stuff in but Python is really it
for a AI/ML these days. Python has probably like centuries of engineering time that has
gone into code in the ecosystem specifically on those topics. So if you're using Python,
you're able to instantly tap into those libraries. Meta has PyTorch, which has a amazing Python API
and front-end people can interact with. There's also SciPy, NumPy, Numba, Pandas. There's a
whole suite of really extensive tools. Trying to build a language and a language ecosystem that
is amendable to all of that is non-trivial. That actually took real design, real thought,
and real ecosystem collective innovation over the course of decades. The back-end of those tools are
usually C or Fortran or some other native language that's much faster, but would be difficult for
someone with an AI background to program in. And it continues to be used for all that by all the
AI scientists, developing the models, and the people training the models, people
using the models. And that brings yet another increment of of growth to the Python community.
[Music] Python's a fantastic language even if you're not a scientist. I just
don't think it would have risen to the level of dramatic usage without the science first
data science and machine learning story. We had a massive impact in the world. You know,
I think one testament to the future of Python is, if you prompt any of the LLMs to do code
generation today. If it's front-end, it's going to be JavaScript. If it's back-end data analysis,
it's going to be Python. That's the future. And Python is a part
of that future. Lucky me that I that I chose that language and not not a different one.
Hey, Jacob. Oh, hello, morning. Hope you don't mind being filmed. Yeah. Ah, okay. Ida's following
me. All right. Yeah, she's shooting some b-roll for the documentary, I think. Ah, nice. I first
used Python in 1997 or something like that. Wow, that's really early days. So, it's got
30 frames of animation. Oh, wow. I told everyone that he would hate getting the DSA, but they did
it anyway. Yeah. Sorry, the DSA? Distinguished Service Award. I labeled him in the annual report
as like a leader in the Python community once and he made me take it out. Yeah, we can see that. But
nevertheless, he was on the steering council for five years. Uhhuh. And he was a leader. I got a
job from a Python conference back in 2017. I grew up in India. I moved to Germany, changed my life.
So I think Python changed a lot of things for me and I just wanted to say thanks to you for for
making this language. That's very sweet. Yeah. Do you mind if I uh take a picture with you or that
you don't like it? I'm so sorry. I really don't like it and especially not in busy places. Okay,
no problem. I get it. Okay. Find me in a dark alley and I'll do it. Okay. Okay. I get it.
Ah, I always kind of looked at myself as the bass player of Python, which is great. You know,
you can do a lot, you can have fun, and the spotlight's not on you. And I love that. I can't
imagine having that kind of spotlight on you, you know, for so many years. I heard a story from
an Apple VP of engineering, that Steve Jobs had turned down their hire of Guido because he said,
he has his own following and we don't want to have that kind of distraction.
Python has always been a language that changed. We've never been one of those languages that says
if you write code against this version of Python, it will run forever with any new version of the
language. We just simply have never been those people. A PEP is an acronym for Python Enhancement
Proposal. That's a document that's written by someone who wants to make a significant
change to Python. Basically, you're trying to convince people that this is a good idea. It
would be sent for discussion for a mailing list and then eventually Guido as the BDFL,
the Benevolent Dictator for Life, would decide whether your change was going in or not. But
people always have worried that the next change is going to be the one that changes the feel of
the language. It won't fit my brain anymore or it won't be accessible anymore. I've actually seen
people storm out of rooms saying, "You're ruining this language." Some people take it very, very
personally and seriously. And the Walrus operator was no different. Yeah so, PEP 572, I don't know
who coined the term the Walrus Operator, but if you kind of turn your head, it looks like
a little walrus. It was a new feature that was proposed, but it was also a syntax change. The
Walrus operator lets you do assignments, meaning put values into variables in places that you
previously could not. That was probably the most contentious language change, oddly enough, because
it's kind of a minor thing, but it it there was so much passionate feeling about whether that should
be added or not that it created kind of a bit of a of a ruckus. When I first saw the Walrus Operator,
I didn't like it. It kind of felt a little un-Pythonic to me, but then I started to play
with it. There was a particular use case that I came up with in my own code that I was like,
"Oh, you know what? This is actually pretty cool". And so then I was like, well, I it's
something that I won't use very often, but when I need it, it's really great to have. And I turned,
you know, 180° and became a fan of it. But it was very disruptive. [Music] Language features and
especially syntax can be a double-edged sword. So one person's succinct, elegant code can be another
person's unreadable puzzle or a fusticated mess. There were very strongly voiced predictions about
how bad it would be for Python. And then just because Python was so much more popular at the
time, there are so many places where people talk about Python. I mean Twitter, you know, at the
time. This is all happening in public, right? And everyone can kind of with low effort throw their
hat into the ring and not everyone is going to restrain themselves when they're doing it.
I started being more and more convinced that PEP 572 was actually the right thing
to do. I was the BDFL and I accepted the PEP. And the next morning I woke up
and I felt miserable
because of all the attacks that had happened before.
I sat down at my computer, wrote a short email, and hit send wherein I announced that I resigned
at BDFL. And that had an incredible impact because nobody had expected I would resign
and certainly not that I would rage quit over this issue, which essentially it was.
[Music]
Transfer of power. Now that PEP 572 is done, I don't ever want to have to
fight so hard for a PEP and find that so many people despise my decisions.
I would like to remove myself entirely from the decision process. I'm basically giving
myself a permanent vacation from being BDFL and you all will be on your own. I am not
going to appoint a successor. So what are you all going to do? Create a democracy, anarchy,
a dictatorship, a federation? I'll still be here, but I'm trying to let you all figure
something out for yourselves. I'm tired and I need a very long break. That was it.
Haven't read that.. That was I thought that was pretty well written. I like to say he mic
dropped his way out. You know, he just was like, I'm out. I'm done. You guys figure it out. So,
it was a complete and total shock to me. Yeah. I just felt really sad about it. I
wish he would have retired under better circumstances. I felt I needed to take a
step back to sort of recover myself. I think a lot of people really felt for Guido, you know,
that he could be pushed to that point like maybe we let him down to allow the vitriol
over this change to Python to push, you know, somebody that we cared about to that point.
We all perceived that it was like a a momentous occasion or like a significant change that
you would put a mark in your timeline in the history book in the history of Python, right?
Because it had been run on the BDFL model for its entire existence. So there was a little bit of
uncertainty like, can this work at all without got Guido? It's kind of a parent saying, it's
time for you to grow up and figure it out on your own. I'm not going to solve this problem for you.
The first order of business was deciding on how to decide. And it turns out some people
have very strong opinions on voting systems. Programmers love arguing about voting methods.
I remember thinking this isn't going to work. Lot of strong voices. It's really difficult when you
have hundreds of core developers and thousands of people online and millions of people in the
community and probably billions of dollars of software that run on Python. You can't think
about that cuz it definitely gets overwhelming. I will fully admit it was stressful. I had to go
to an ear, nose, and throat specialist because I actually was starting to choke on my own throat
from the stress. It was not fun because if we couldn't decide on how we were going to decide,
the project was done. We really approached it like the nerdy engineers we are. In Python classic
fashion, we wrote a bunch of peps. We didn't want to rush it because we knew we were going to have
to live with this potentially forever. But we also realized the world was watching and did not like
the idea of not knowing whether this language was going to be around in a year or not, because we
couldn't stop bickering among ourselves about how to run ourselves. People sponsored different kinds
of models. I think there was one which was like, let's pick another BDFL because that's what we
feel comfortable with. And then there was various kinds of committees and councils and we ended up
settling on the five person steering committee. Good morning PyCon! Thanks so much for joining
us. So, welcome to our panel with the Python steering council. Because there's five people,
you don't have the same problem of like all the stress and responsibility of making these
decisions falling on one person. I actually felt that it made sense for me to be on that
first steering council given that there was no longer feeling so burned out or attacked,
to provide some amount of continuity. "You know how this goes when your kid goes off to college.
Some of you may have experience with that. you're no longer directly involved in their lives maybe,
but you never stop worrying. And that's how I feel about Python at the moment. And that's
why I [Applause] why I nominated myself for the steering committee and here I am".
There were elections for the second year steering council and at first I nominated myself and then
withdrew because there were enough other strong candidates. They didn't need me and I was happy to
uh to sort of let go of it. [Music] The legitimacy that came from the replacement springing up from
the community is essential to it being accepted. It came from us, so it's accepted by us. It works.
I think it works for us now. There may be a time in the future where it doesn't work or pieces of
it don't work. You have to be willing to evolve. Change is the one universal constant of the
universe. And so things will always change and you have to be ready and willing to adapt to change.
[Music]
It started out as a hobby project. Definitely. I think I probably wanted to prove something
to myself more than anything. It exceeded my wildest expectations and it actually continues
to do so. I constantly hear from people whose lives were completely changed by Python and it
has created this incredible community which was also a complete sort of bonus over everything
else I had anticipated. This community that has like a massive conference every year and
smaller conferences in every continent I think except Antarctica. There was one of the Python
conferences where there was a few thousand people in the audience. I remember just looking around
and going, this is mind-blowing. That's the point at which I knew we had achieved something
important, something that made a difference in people's lives and in the world. Python turned out
to be much more successful than perhaps any of us thought except maybe Guido and his team. I think
they always believed that this was the future. And of course, it's now one of the most popular,
if not the most popular programming language in the world. He spent two weeks in Christmas,
in like 1989, writing a programming language because he thought it would be fun. Like who
would have imagined that that would be such a life altering and also world altering thing to have
done. I think it's been great for the world. I think it's made people feel like they can get into
programming when they never thought they could. I think it made programming accessible to people.
It's literally part of kindergarten through grade 12 education around the world. And is on Mars
thanks to being used as a scripting language to process the parachute of the Perseverance rover
landing. Like it's hard to think of anything that hasn't been touched by some Python code
somewhere. It's mind boggling. It's an important language. It's a popular language. It's a vibrant
and relevant language today as much as it was in the past and I believe as much as it will be in
the future. Programmers 30 years from now will be like, "Oh yeah, you know, I I'm still using
Python." Just like today, people are still using Fortran and C and C++ and those are old languages
you know too in the scheme of things. Scheme - Lisp another old language. So yeah. [Music]
Now I keep thinking of like weird jokes. There's this library in
Python called Pickles because pickle is a funny word I guess. The documentation used
to have a footnote about how you should imagine Guido and Jim sniffing pickles.
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
