Hang tight while we fetch the video data and transcripts. This only takes a moment.
Connecting to YouTube player…
Fetching transcript data…
We’ll display the transcript, summary, and all view options as soon as everything loads.
Next steps
Loading transcript tools…
Episode 20: Third-Party and Vendor Risk Management | Bare Metal Cyber | YouTubeToText
YouTube Transcript: Episode 20: Third-Party and Vendor Risk Management
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Video Summary
Summary
Core Theme
Third-party and vendor risk management is a critical, evolving challenge in modern cybersecurity, essential for protecting organizations from operational disruptions, legal liabilities, and reputational damage stemming from their reliance on external service providers.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
Third-party and vendor risk management
has become one of the defining
challenges of modern cyber security
governance. As organizations expand
their reliance on external service
providers, cloud platforms and
contractors, the traditional perimeter
of control has dissolved. Vendor risk
management ensures that these partners
meet the same security and compliance
standards expected internally,
protecting sensitive data and
maintaining trust across the business
ecosystem. A single weak link, whether a
cloud provider, payment processor, or IT
consultant, can expose the enterprise to
operational disruption, legal liability,
and reputational damage. Effective
oversight of thirdparty relationships is
therefore not optional. It is essential
to sustaining resilience and regulatory
compliance. The growing complexity of
vendor ecosystems has amplified both
opportunity and risk. Outsourcing allows
organizations to scale rapidly, leverage
specialized expertise, and improve
efficiency. Yet, every connection to a
third-party environment introduces a new
potential entry point for cyber threats.
Vendors often hold privileged access to
networks, process confidential data, or
influence missionritical operations. The
sheer number of interdependent service
providers, often spanning multiple
continents, has expanded the attack
surface far beyond what internal teams
alone can monitor. In this
interconnected landscape, a coordinated
approach to vendor oversight is the only
defense against cascading supply chain
failures. Risks within vendor
relationships fall into several
categories. Operational risk arises when
third parties fail to deliver services
reliably, potentially interrupting
business continuity. Legal and
compliance risk occurs when vendors
violate data protection laws or
contractual obligations, exposing the
organization to fines and litigation.
Reputational risk surfaces when a
supplier's breach damages customer
confidence or brand integrity. Financial
risk may stem from contract disputes,
penalties, or lost revenue following
service disruptions. Understanding these
categories allows CISOs to design
layered defense strategies, combining
policy, technical monitoring, and
governance to manage risk at both
strategic and operational levels. Due
diligence is the first safeguard in any
vendor risk management life cycle.
Before signing a contract, organizations
must evaluate the vendor's security,
maturity, compliance record, and
operational resilience. This process
often includes questionnaires,
documentation reviews, and validation of
certifications such as ISO 2701, SOCK 2,
or PCIDSS.
Background checks on incident history,
litigation, or regulatory findings
provide further insight into potential
red flags. Due diligence is not a mere
formality. It establishes the foundation
for informed trust. By thoroughly
assessing vendors at the outset,
organizations can prevent costly
surprises and set clear expectations for
future performance. Contractual
safeguards transform due diligence
findings into enforcable commitments.
Security clauses within master service
agreements should mandate adherence to
defined standards, require timely
notification of incidents, and specify
data handling procedures. Data
protection clauses formalize privacy and
confidentiality obligations, while right
to audit provisions allow verification
of compliance throughout the contract's
lifespan. Service level agreements or
SLAs's must set measurable targets for
uptime, response time, and reporting
frequency. These contractual controls
create legal and operational
accountability, ensuring that vendors
treat information security as an ongoing
responsibility rather than a one-time
requirement. Vendor onboarding is the
next critical stage where oversight
structures move from theory to practice.
Each vendor should be classified
according to the sensitivity of the data
they handle and the systems they access.
High-risk vendors undergo enhanced
scrutiny and require executive approval
before engagement. The onboarding
process should include risk, legal, and
security reviews as well as mandatory
training for vendors working with
sensitive information. Once approved,
vendors must be integrated into the
organization's broader governance
framework with defined reporting
channels and escalation paths.
Structured onboarding ensures that risk
ownership and expectations are clear
from the very beginning of the
relationship. Ongoing monitoring and
oversight distinguish mature vendor risk
programs from reactive ones. Risk
management does not end with contract
signing. It continues through the entire
vendor life cycle. Continuous
performance tracking, regular security
assessments, and updates to compliance
documentation maintain visibility into
evolving risks. Automated tools can
monitor external threat indicators such
as dark web activity or vulnerabilities
in vendor networks. Periodic
reassessments ensure that classification
levels remain appropriate as vendor
roles or technologies change. This
continuous oversight transforms vendor
risk management into a living process,
ensuring alignment with both regulatory
requirements and organizational risk
tolerance. Incident management within
the thirdparty ecosystem requires close
coordination and clear communication.
Vendors must have predefined obligations
for reporting breaches or security
incidents, including timelines and
contact procedures. Shared playbooks
enable joint incident response, aligning
vendor actions with the organization's
broader response and notification plans.
Collaboration between legal, compliance,
and security teams ensures that
regulatory reporting obligations such as
GDPR or sector specific disclosure
requirements are met on time. Escalation
protocols define when executives and
customers must be informed. Well
ststructured thirdparty incident
management reduces confusion during
crisis and prevents reputational damage
through timely, transparent response.
Fourth party and nthparty risks add
another layer of complexity. Many
vendors rely on subcontractors or other
service providers, creating extended
chains of dependency that fall outside
direct organizational oversight. These
downstream relationships often introduce
vulnerabilities that are invisible to
the contracting organization. Due
diligence processes must therefore
include disclosure of subcontractors,
requiring transparency throughout the
supply chain. Contracts should mandate
flowown clauses that extend security and
compliance obligations to all
subcontractors. By addressing these
indirect relationships, CISOs ensure
that accountability flows through every
layer of the vendor network. Metrics
provide a means of evaluating and
improving the effectiveness of vendor
risk programs. Key performance
indicators may include the percentage of
critical vendors with completed
assessments, the number of audit
findings linked to thirdparty gaps, and
the frequency or severity of vendor
related incidents. Additional metrics
such as remediation time frames and
compliance verification rates measure
responsiveness and maturity. Executive
dashboards aggregate this data, offering
leadership clear visibility into vendor
risk posture. metrics not only track
performance but also communicate
progress, demonstrating to boards and
regulators that oversight is structured,
measurable, and continuously improving.
Vendor offboarding marks the formal
conclusion of a third-party
relationship, but carries as much risk
as onboarding. Access rights must be
revoked promptly to prevent unauthorized
use of systems or data. Organizations
should verify that all data is returned
or securely destroyed with documentation
serving as audit evidence. A
post-termination review evaluates vendor
performance and identifies lessons
learned for future engagements. Proper
off-boarding also ensures that residual
risks such as lingering credentials or
uncollected devices are eliminated.
Treating offboarding with the same rigor
as onboarding protects the organization
from lingering vulnerabilities and
compliance exposure. Regulatory
expectations for vendor oversight
continue to expand, emphasizing the
importance of supply chain
accountability. Financial regulators
such as the Federal Reserve and the
European Banking Authority require
institutions to demonstrate vendor due
diligence and continuous monitoring.
Healthcare organizations must comply
with HIPPA business associate agreements
while GDPR mandates that data
controllers ensure processor compliance.
Failure to maintain proper oversight can
trigger fines, enforcement actions or
reputational harm. Documentation,
policies, contracts, risk assessments,
and audit reports must be readily
available to regulators during reviews.
Proactive compliance with these
expectations demonstrates both
transparency and governance maturity.
For more cyber related content and
books, please check out cyberauthor.me.
Also, there are other prepcasts on cyber
security and more at bare metalcyber.com.
metalcyber.com.
Managing a global supply chain
introduces unique challenges that extend
far beyond traditional vendor oversight.
International suppliers operate under
varying legal, cultural, and regulatory
conditions that can affect data
protection standards and business
continuity. Crossber data transfers
require safeguards such as encryption,
contractual clauses, and compliance with
frameworks like the GDPR standard
contractual clauses or adequacy
decisions. Political instability, trade
restrictions, or regional conflicts can
disrupt vendor operations and complicate
oversight. A harmonized global vendor
management program establishes
consistent expectations across all
jurisdictions while allowing flexibility
for local laws. This global coherence
ensures that enterprise security posture
remains unified even when operations
span diverse regions and legal
landscapes. Tools and frameworks have
become indispensable in managing vendor
ecosystems efficiently. Governance, risk
and compliance GRC platforms automate
critical components of thirdparty risk
management, streamlining assessments,
tracking remediation, and consolidating
documentation. Shared assessment
programs such as the standardized
information gathering SIG questionnaire
or industry consortiums reduce vendor
fatigue by aligning evaluation
requirements across clients. Standards
like NIST SP800161
for supply chain risk management and ISO
27036 for supplier relationships
provides structured guidance. When
technology and frameworks are combined,
organizations achieve scalable oversight
that balances depth with efficiency,
enabling continuous governance across
thousands of vendor relationships.
Challenges persist, however, in
achieving comprehensive visibility
across large vendor networks. Many
organizations struggle to track
subcontractors or forth parties hidden
within complex service chains. Vendors
may resist sharing detailed security
information, citing confidentiality or
contractual limitations. Monitoring an
expansive ecosystem consumes time and
resources, particularly when oversight
requires coordination across multiple
departments and geographies. Balancing
business agility with due diligence can
also create tension as rapid procurement
processes sometimes bypass rigorous
assessments. To overcome these
challenges, organizations must embed
vendor risk management into procurement
workflows, ensuring that efficiency does
not compromise governance or
accountability. Best practices for
effective vendor oversight center on
structure, transparency, and
collaboration. A risk-based vendor
classification framework ensures that
critical partners, those handling
sensitive data or providing essential
services, receive heightened scrutiny.
Maintaining an up-to-date inventory of
all vendors categorized by risk level
and service type provides clarity and
focus. Oversight should be layered.
Contractual safeguards, periodic audits,
and real time monitoring each contribute
to resilience. Collaboration between the
organization and its vendors fosters
shared responsibility rather than
adversarial oversight. When vendors view
compliance as a partnership goal rather
than a burden, overall supply chain
security maturity improves. Executives
play a pivotal role in driving the
success of vendor risk management
programs. Boards and CISOs must set the
tone by defining clear expectations for
third-party oversight and allocating
appropriate budgets and resources.
Regular reporting to leadership ensures
visibility into vendor performance,
incident trends, and emerging risks.
Executive engagement also reinforces
accountability, sending a message across
the enterprise that vendor governance is
not an administrative task, but a
strategic imperative. When leadership
demonstrates active involvement, vendor
management programs gain authority,
direction, and sustained momentum,
qualities essential to maintaining trust
with customers and regulators alike. The
metrics used to measure vendor risk
program maturity also serve as tools for
executive communication. Dashboards
displaying vendor classification,
assessment completion rates, and
incident frequency make risk visible at
a glance. Comparative analytics identify
systemic issues such as recurring
non-compliance across similar vendors,
guiding targeted improvement
initiatives. Metrics tied to remediation
timelines and residual risk levels help
boards evaluate whether investments in
vendor management are delivering
measurable outcomes. These insights
transform oversight from reactive
monitoring into predictive governance,
empowering executives to anticipate
challenges and allocate resources
proactively. Vendor oversight
increasingly intersects with global
compliance expectations. Regulators
across financial, healthcare, and
technology sectors now require
organizations to demonstrate
accountability for their thirdparty
ecosystems. Frameworks such as the EU's
digital operational resilience act DORA
and the US securities and exchange
commission's cyber security disclosure
rules highlight supply chain
accountability as a board level issue.
This convergence of regulation and
governance signals a new era where
supply chain integrity is treated as an
extension of enterprise risk management.
Organizations that adopt proactive,
documented oversight not only meet
compliance expectations, but also
position themselves as industry leaders
in responsible business conduct.
Technology continues to reshape how
vendor risk programs operate. Artificial
intelligence and machine learning now
enhance due diligence by analyzing
patterns in vendor data, threat
intelligence, and performance metrics.
Predictive analytics can identify early
indicators of risk such as deteriorating
financial stability or increased
vulnerability exposure before incidents
occur. Blockchain technologies show
promise for secure verifiable evidence
sharing across supply chains, improving
trust without compromising
confidentiality. As digital ecosystems
grow more interconnected, the future of
vendor management lies in predictive
automated systems that offer real-time
assurance of compliance and resilience.
Cultural alignment is another vital yet
often overlooked factor in vendor
management success. Vendors must not
only comply with technical standards,
but also embody the organization's
values around security, privacy, and
ethics. Integrating cultural
expectations into contracts, onboarding,
and performance reviews ensures
consistent behavior across the supply
chain. This approach moves vendor
governance beyond compliance checklists,
building relationships rooted in shared
principles. Over time, these
partnerships yield greater transparency,
mutual learning, and innovation in risk
management practices, turning security
collaboration into a competitive differentiator.
differentiator.
Mature vendor risk management programs
also integrate lessons learned from
incidents and audits into continuous
improvement cycles. Every third-party
breach or compliance gap provides
insights that should feed back into risk
scoring models, due diligence processes,
and contractual templates. Annual
program reviews assess effectiveness,
benchmark against peers, and adjust
strategies to reflect regulatory changes
and emerging threats. Continuous
improvement transforms vendor oversight
from a reactive necessity into a
proactive leadership function. It
reflects an organization's capacity to
adapt, evolve, and maintain trust in an
increasingly complex global supply chain
environment. The ultimate success of
vendor risk management depends on its
integration with enterprise governance.
When third-party oversight is embedded
into procurement, risk management, and
board reporting processes, it ceases to
function as an isolated compliance task.
Instead, it becomes a critical component
of the organization's overall resilience
strategy. Alignment with broader
enterprise risk frameworks ensures that
vendor oversight contributes directly to
strategic decision-making. As CISOs and
executives refine these integrations,
they build not only secure supply
chains, but also stronger, more
transparent ecosystems of trust. In
conclusion, third-party and vendor risk
management represents the front line of
modern cyber security defense. By
combining due diligence, contractual
controls, continuous monitoring, and
executive oversight, organizations
protect themselves from the growing
complexity of supply chain threats.
Effective governance extends beyond
direct vendors to include
subcontractors, global partners, and
digital service providers. Through
automation, collaboration, and sustained
leadership engagement, vendor risk
management evolves from compliance
obligation to strategic advantage,
preserving trust, ensuring resilience,
and reinforcing the integrity of
interconnected enterprises in a global
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
