Hang tight while we fetch the video data and transcripts. This only takes a moment.
Connecting to YouTube player…
Fetching transcript data…
We’ll display the transcript, summary, and all view options as soon as everything loads.
Next steps
Loading transcript tools…
Episode 26: Internal Audit Process Fundamentals | Bare Metal Cyber | YouTubeToText
YouTube Transcript: Episode 26: Internal Audit Process Fundamentals
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Video Summary
Summary
Core Theme
Internal audits are essential for organizational assurance, providing an independent, objective review of controls and processes to identify vulnerabilities, improve efficiency, and foster accountability, ultimately strengthening governance and resilience.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
Internal audits serve as the backbone of
organizational assurance, offering an
independent perspective on how well
internal controls and policies operate.
Their purpose extends beyond compliance.
They are proactive instruments of
governance that help management detect
vulnerabilities before they escalate
into crisis. By objectively reviewing
business processes, internal auditors
identify inefficiencies, redundancies,
and gaps in accountability that may
otherwise remain hidden. They provide
leadership with a confidence that
systems are functioning as intended and
that risks are being managed
responsibly. This assurance is
particularly vital in complex
enterprises where numerous departments
interact, making it difficult for
executives to maintain full visibility
over control effectiveness without
structured independent oversight. The
first step in a successful internal
audit is the planning phase, which
establishes the foundation for the
entire engagement. Planning involves
defining the objectives that align with
the organization's strategic and risk
priorities. The scope is carefully
selected based on business processes,
regulatory requirements, and the
organization's exposure to potential
threats. Resources such as auditor
expertise, technology tools, and
schedules are allocated to match the
audit's complexity. Importantly, a
risk-based approach ensures that
attention is focused on areas where
weaknesses could cause the greatest
harm. Thoughtful planning prevents
wasted effort and increases the audit's
relevance to decision makers. Central to
any internal audit function is the audit
charter, a formal document that defines
the audit's authority, independence, and
purpose. The charter is typically
approved by the board or audit committee
and establishes the internal audit
team's right to access records,
personnel, and systems necessary to
perform its work. Independence from
operational management is crucial.
Auditors cannot effectively evaluate
processes they directly manage. This
separation fosters objectivity and
reinforces trust in the audit results.
The charter also delineates
accountability, clarifying that internal
audits role is to assess and recommend
not to implement or manage controls
themselves. Before the first interview
or test begins, auditors engage in pre-
audit preparation, which sets the stage
for efficient fieldwork. They collect
foundational materials such as
organizational charts, policy manuals,
and process documentation. A detailed
audit program is then crafted outlining
the specific tests and evidence
required. Stakeholders are consulted to
clarify responsibilities, ensuring there
are no misunderstandings about timing,
scope, or expectations. This preparatory
phase minimizes disruption to business
operations and helps build cooperative
relationships between auditors and
audites. Clear communication during this
period also establishes a tone of
professionalism and transparency.
Fieldwork is the phase where evidence
gathering takes center stage. Auditors
employ multiple techniques, interviews,
direct observation, and system testing
to verify that controls function as
described. Evidence may include activity
logs, reconciliations, or exception
reports that illustrate how processes
work in real conditions. Both
preventative controls, which stop errors
before they occur, and detective
controls, which identify anomalies after
the fact, are evaluated. The credibility
of the audit depends on the quality of
this evidence, which must be sufficient,
relevant, and reliable. In this way,
fieldwork transforms theoretical
understanding into verifiable assurance.
To ensure that conclusions are accurate,
auditors apply structured testing
techniques that bring rigor to their
evaluations. Sampling allows them to
analyze a representative subset of data
rather than every transaction, saving
time while maintaining reliability.
Walkthroughs help confirm that process
documentation aligns with actual
practice. Reperformance involves
independently executing control steps to
test their consistency and accuracy.
Analytical procedures such as trend or
ratio analysis reveal patterns that may
indicate deeper issues. When used
together, these methods balance
precision with efficiency, giving
auditors a comprehensive understanding
of control performance. Evaluating
control effectiveness is one of the most
critical steps in the internal audit
process. This stage requires auditors to
judge whether each control truly
achieves its intended purpose and
whether it mitigates the associated
risks to an acceptable level. Auditors
assess both design and operational
effectiveness. Design addresses whether
the control is structured properly while
operational effectiveness examines
whether it functions consistently in
practice. Weaknesses can arise from
outdated procedures, human error, or
technology limitations. By comparing
controls against established policies,
best practices, and industry benchmarks,
auditors can determine whether
additional safeguards are necessary.
This evaluation provides actionable
insight, enabling management to make
informed riskbased decisions throughout
the audit. Maintaining effective
communication with stakeholders ensures
transparency and trust. Regular updates
keep process owners informed about
progress, early findings, and potential
issues that may affect operations. Open
dialogue helps clarify observations
before they become formal findings and
prevents misunderstandings about scope
or intent. When auditors communicate
clearly, departments are less likely to
view the audit as punitive and more as a
collaborative improvement effort.
Managing expectations, especially around
timing and deliverables, prevents
unnecessary tension. In this way,
communication becomes both a governance
tool and a means of reinforcing audit
integrity. Reporting is the culmination
of the audit cycle, translating
technical findings into language that
executives and the board can act upon. A
well ststructured report organizes
results by finding, risk rating, and
recommendation. Severity levels, often
categorized as high, medium, or low,
guide management in prioritizing
corrective actions. Executive summaries
distill the most important information,
highlighting issues that impact
governance, compliance, or financial
performance. Effective reports balance
precision with clarity, avoiding
unnecessary jargon while maintaining
professional rigor. They provide not
only a snapshot of current performance
but also a roadmap for improvement that
aligns with the organization's strategic
objectives. Once findings are
documented, attention shifts to
corrective action planning. Each
recommendation must be converted into a
practical remediation step that
addresses the underlying cause of the
deficiency. Accountability is assigned
to specific departments or leaders to
ensure follow-through. Governance
committees such as the audit committee
or risk council often oversee this
process to maintain accountability and
momentum. Target dates are established
to track progress with periodic status
updates ensuring that remediation does
not stall. The goal is not simply to fix
isolated problems but to strengthen
systemic resilience across the
enterprise. Follow-up and verification
bring closure and ensure that promised
corrective actions have truly resolved
identified weaknesses. Auditors review
supporting documentation, interview
responsible personnel, and where
appropriate, retest controls. If a
finding remains unresolved or reappears
in subsequent audits, it signals deeper
issues in accountability or risk
ownership. Escalating such matters to
executive leadership reinforces the
seriousness of remediation commitments.
Proper documentation of follow-up
efforts also builds a strong audit
trail, demonstrating to regulators or
external auditors that issues are
actively managed and resolved in a
timely manner. For more cyber related
content and books, please check out cyberauthor.me.
cyberauthor.me.
Also, there are other prepcasts on cyber
security and more at bare metalcyber.com.
metalcyber.com.
Internal auditors serve a dual role
within the organization. Evaluators of
control performance and advisers for
continuous improvement. As evaluators,
they provide assurance that governance
structures and processes function as
intended. As advisers, they offer
recommendations that strengthen
efficiency and foster accountability.
This advisory role, however, must never
compromise independence. Auditors must
maintain professional distance from the
operations they review. Their integrity
is the foundation of credibility, making
adherence to professional standards and
ethical codes essential. Continuous
professional education, certifications
such as CIA or CISA, and awareness of
evolving risks ensure that internal
auditors remain effective in an
everchanging business landscape.
Collaboration with external auditors
enhances the overall assurance
environment. While internal and external
audits have distinct mandates, they
often examine overlapping areas. Sharing
results reduces duplication of effort
and minimizes disruption to business
units. Internal auditors can provide
external examiners with valuable context
about organizational risks and control
environments, enabling more focused
external assessments. In turn, insights
from external auditors can help internal
teams refine their methodologies and
align with broader compliance
expectations. This partnership not only
promotes efficiency, but also
strengthens trust among regulators,
boards, and stakeholders who rely on the
integrity of audit outcomes. Metrics
play an important role in evaluating the
performance of an internal audit
program. Key indicators such as the
percentage of audits completed on time,
the number of high-risisk findings
identified and resolved, and average
remediation time provide measurable
insights into program effectiveness.
Benchmarking these results against
industry peers or prior years can
highlight trends and areas for
improvement. Balanced metrics consider
both quantity and quality, measuring not
only how many audits are completed, but
also their impact on reducing
organizational risk. Datadriven
oversight transforms the audit function
from a compliance exercise into a
strategic performance enhancer.
Technology has transformed internal
auditing from a periodic review activity
into a continuous assurance capability.
Modern audit teams leverage data
analytics to identify anomalies across
large data sets that would be impossible
to analyze manually. Governance, risk
and compliance. GRC platforms automate
audit planning, workflow management and
evidence collection, improving
consistency and transparency. Continuous
auditing tools provide near realtime
monitoring of key risk indicators,
enabling faster detection of issues.
Automation also reduces human error and
allows auditors to focus on
interpretation and strategic analysis
rather than manual data handling. As
technology evolves, auditors must adapt
their skill sets to harness these tools
effectively. Despite their importance,
internal audits face persistent
challenges that test both efficiency and
independence. Limited resources often
restrict the number of audits that can
be performed, forcing difficult
prioritization decisions. Departments
under review may resist scrutiny,
perceiving audits as threats rather than
opportunities for improvement.
Maintaining independence while working
within the same organization can also
create subtle pressures. Furthermore,
the rapid pace of technological and
regulatory change demands that audit
programs be continuously updated to
remain relevant. Addressing these
challenges requires not only technical
skill but also diplomacy, communication,
and leadership. Internal audits
ultimately deliver significant value to
executive leadership by bridging the gap
between operational reality and
strategic intent. They provide assurance
that governance frameworks are
functioning, that resources are
allocated effectively, and that
regulatory obligations are being met.
The insights gained from audits guide
executives in making informed decisions
about investments in security,
compliance, and risk management. Beyond
assurance, internal audits foster a
culture of accountability and continuous
improvement. When leadership embraces
audit findings as opportunities rather
than criticisms, the organization
becomes more resilient, agile, and
aligned with its long-term objectives.
The strength of an internal audit
program lies in its ability to connect
governance principles with daily
operational realities. Each audit serves
as a mirror reflecting how effectively
an organization manages its obligations,
risks, and ethical commitments. A mature
audit function is not reactive, but
anticipatory, identifying weaknesses
before they manifest into incidents.
This proactive stance creates a feedback
loop between policy and practice,
ensuring that leadership decisions
remain grounded in verified data. By
translating complex control frameworks
into accessible insights, internal
auditors help executives understand how
compliance and efficiency coexist within
the same organizational system. A
well-designed audit cycle reinforces
accountability across all levels of
management. When departments know that
independent reviews will test their
adherence to policies and procedures,
they are more likely to maintain high
standards throughout the year. This
consistent expectation shapes behavior,
transforming compliance from a once-
aear checklist into an embedded cultural
norm. Internal audits therefore serve as
both deterrence and educators, deterring
negligence while teaching better
practices. The ultimate outcome is a
workplace where everyone understands
that governance is not a constraint but
a shared responsibility essential to
organizational integrity. Continuous
improvement is central to the audit
philosophy. Lessons learned from each
engagement should inform updates to
methodologies, tools, and training.
Regular peer reviews and quality
assessments keep the audit process sharp
and credible. By soliciting feedback
from audites and management, audit teams
gain perspective on how to improve
communication and reporting clarity.
Such evolution ensures that the audit
function remains aligned with emerging
risks, industry standards, and
stakeholder expectations. In this way,
internal auditing becomes a living
discipline, dynamic, introspective, and
forward-looking. To ensure that findings
have lasting impact, internal audit must
maintain visibility after reports are
issued. Ongoing interaction with
management keeps remediation efforts on
track and validates that corrective
measures achieve desired outcomes. This
sustained involvement also demonstrates
to regulators and boards that audit is
not a one-time event but part of a
continuous governance process. When
issues are resolved effectively and
improvements are documented, the
credibility of the audit function grows
over time. This reliability builds trust
between auditors, management, and the
board, strengthening the organization's
overall assurance framework. In a modern
risk environment, the scope of internal
audit increasingly overlaps with cyber
security, data governance, and privacy
management. As digital transformation
reshapes business operations, auditors
must develop competencies in these areas
to remain relevant. Evaluating how
security controls protect critical
assets, how data is stored and processed
and how privacy regulations are met has
become integral to assurance. The best
audit programs integrate these
perspectives, treating information
security as a governance issue rather
than purely a technical one. This
evolution underscores the strategic role
of internal audit as a bridge between
technology and leadership. In
conclusion, internal audits embody the
principle of proactive assurance through
structured planning, diligent fieldwork,
insightful reporting, and systematic
follow-up. They ensure that
organizations not only meet compliance
obligations, but also strengthen their
internal governance. Independence,
professionalism, and analytical rigor
give audit findings their weight and
credibility. As technology and risks
evolve, continuous auditing and adaptive
methodologies sustain organizational
resilience. Ultimately, a strong
internal audit program does more than
uncover deficiencies. It reinforces
trust, transparency, and the pursuit of
excellence that define mature and
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
