The provided text argues that the law of gravity is a fabricated concept, a "hoax" and a "scop" in history, perpetuated by "freemasonic science." It claims that phenomena attributed to gravity are better explained by principles of density and buoyancy.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
The so-called law of gravity is a
monumental hoax and constitutes one of
the biggest scops in all of history.
Assuming we actually live on the
spinning globe earth promoted by modern
freemasonic science, consider the
following calculations and contradictions.
contradictions.
The supposed law of gravity claims its
mysterious action at a distance force
can be measured as g * m1 * m2 / r 2
with g being equivalent to 6.674
* 10 ^ of -1.
Now consider the one world trade center
in New York which has a mass of
approximately 1 trill50 million kg. This
means that if you are an 80 kg man
standing 10 m away from the one world
trade center then there should be an
expected horizontal gravity of 0.05606
m/s squared. Considering the standard
rate of vertical gravity is 9.81 m/s
squared. This means the expected
horizontal gravity from the one world
trade center should be pulling at about
174th that of standard vertical gravity.
This may not sound significant but it
must be measurable and this point
becomes extremely interesting when the
same 80 kg man stands just 1 meter from
the one world trade center. In this
instance, the questionable law of
gravity calculates that the horizontal
gravity increases 100fold to a whopping
5.606 m/s squared, which is more than
half of standard vertical gravity. This
would absolutely be both measurable and
noticeable. The gravitational attraction
between an 80 kg man standing 1 meter
from the World Trade Center should be
easily felt and should require
significant effort to resist being
pulled into the wall like a magnet.
Finally, if the same man were to be so
unfortunate as to touch the trade
center, the bogus law of gravity says
that you will need to call the fire
brigade to come and detach the man
because he will no longer be able to
break free by his own strength.
Consider the same 80 kg man now on a
vacation to Switzerland where he goes to
rock climb the famous north face of the
Iger mountain. Here the mystical law of
gravity predicts that even if he loses
his grip while climbing, there is no
need to fear because it's impossible for
him to fall from the 10 billion ton
mountain. Since the distance between
himself and the mountain is almost zero,
making r squared in the equation nearly
negligible, the amount of horizontal
gravity pulling at him should cause him
to cling to the rock face like a magnet
sticking to a refrigerator door. Thus,
according to the magical law of gravity,
we are assured that rock climbing
massive mountains like these is actually
among the safest of pursuits imaginable
because falling is deemed physically
impossible. Again, it cannot be
overstated. The formula for gravity
implicitly implies that as any two
objects approach each other, the closer
the R value drops to zero, the stronger
the pulling force that exists between
them. When two objects physically touch
each other, the gravitational force
between them increases to a very large
number, implying that they should become
difficult to separate. In reality,
however, only magnets behave this way,
and no other objects show this supposed
increased attraction proportional to
distance as predicted by gravity.
Freemasonic science apologists
attempting to refute the necessity of
non-vertical gravity will often assert
the Star Trek argument of gravity only
comes from the center of the Earth,
Captain. But this is a nonsensical
double standard because the same broken
law of gravity claims this calculable
mutual attraction exists between all
objects, even between two particles, and
not solely from the center.
Google AI clarifies
gravitational attraction emanates from
the entire mass of an object, not just
from its center of mass. When dealing
with objects far apart or those with
spherical symmetry, assuming all mass
concentrates at a single point is done
to simplify calculations. Gravity acts
on all parts. While the center of mass
is helpful for simplified calculations,
every part of an object contributes to
its gravitational field. And this
distributed attraction has significant
consequences in various situations.
In other words, the pull of gravity
comes from the entire mass of objects,
not just from their center. So the
excuse of claiming gravity only comes
from the center of the Earth globe is an
unevidenced backpedaling double
standard. Another one of gravity's
nonsensical double standards is that
this same force is attributed to two
very different effects. Gravity is said
to cause all objects, people, buildings,
oceans, and the entire atmosphere to
stay clinging stuck to the spinning
globe Earth. Meanwhile, gravity is also
said to cause the moon to orbit around
the earth, the earth and other planets
to orbit around the sun, and the solar
system to orbit around the galaxy. This
means that sometimes gravity causes
objects to stick to one another, and
other times gravity causes objects to
orbit around one another. How can these
two very different effects be attributed
to the same force? Freemasonic science
claims that if the initial speed and
trajectory of the two objects is just
right, then instead of crashing
together, they can somehow perpetually
orbit each other due to the force of
gravity being perfectly balanced out by
the object's inertia, causing a
continuous curve around the central
object. If this is true, why is there
not a single experiment or demonstration
in history that shows two objects
meeting with such perfect inertia and
trajectory as to lock themselves in
perpetual orbit with one another? Why is
this special effect of gravity
conveniently limited only to objects so
large we cannot experiment on them? Yet
another contradiction and double
standard from the illogical law of
gravity is the behavior of helium
balloons. The formula for calculating
the force of gravity depends solely on
the masses of the two objects and the
distance between them. This means any
objects of nonzero mass will be subject
to the pull of gravity proportional to
their distance from one another. Why
then do helium balloons defy this fickle
law of gravity by first rising and then
clinging to your ceiling for several
days before slowly starting to hover
lower and then after many more hours or
days eventually settle to the ground.
Releasing the helium balloon from 10 m
off the ground or 1 cm off the ground
makes absolutely no difference to the
balloon's immediate defiance of gravity.
The same applies for a basketball thrown
into a lake. The broken law of gravity
calculates that the basketball must sink
and remain stuck at the bottom of the
lake because the force of gravity
depends solely on the masses of the two
objects and the distance between them.
But the basketball defies law by
immediately rising to the surface right
after it's thrown in.
How is it that helium balloons and
basketballs can become veritable
anti-gravity devices?
It's because the effects of so-called
gravity were actually well understood
and adequately explained by Archimedes
over 2,000 years ago. The Archimedes
principle buoyant force and relative
density already explained the effects of
fake gravity better and long before
Freemason and Jesuit Isaac Newton came
along with his inferior and redundant
theory. Under the valid laws of density
and buoyancy, everything seeks its
relative density with the medium
surrounding and rises or falls
accordingly. The true constant is
density, not gravity.
Basketballs fall down because they are
denser than air. And helium balloons
rise up because they are lighter than
air. A basketball held underwater and
released quickly rises to the surface
because the air inside the basketball
causes it to have a density less than
water. Then if a hole is poked in the
basketball and all the air squeezed out,
it will once again sink to the bottom of
the lake because its relative density
has increased to being more than water.
Newton's redundant theory of gravity has
nothing to do with this and simply
piggybacks off Archimedes principle and
the natural physics of density and buoyancy.
buoyancy.
If Newton's apple had landed in a puddle
instead of on his head, he would have
seen the apple only fell through the air
because it was denser than the air, but
then floated on top of the water because
it was less dense than water. These
so-called effects of gravity have
everything to do with relative density
and buoyant force and nothing to do with
Newton's extraneous theory of magical
action at a distance. In reality, this
pulling force called gravity has never
been proven to exist. And the only
reason it is referred to as law is
because the majority of Freemasonic
science depends upon it. Without this
myth of gravity, a whole host of other
lies and misconceptions are exposed as
nothing but untenable theories,
including the supposed spinning globe
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
