0:04 hello everyone welcome to prostohub and
0:06 myself Dr Jones now so today we are
0:09 going to start off with a new topic that
0:13 is biomechanics of dental implants
0:15 the contents include introduction
0:18 natural tooth versus implant biomechanics
0:19 biomechanics
0:21 the different types of loads that is
0:25 applied under implants the stress strain
0:27 relationship and hook slow
0:29 the first delivery and failure
0:32 mechanisms fatigue failure scientific
0:34 rationally for Implant design single
0:37 tooth implant by mechanics biomechanics
0:39 and Candy liver processes and framework
0:42 as well as Misfit the treatment planning
0:45 based on biomechanical risk factors and
0:48 finally the conclusional references so
0:50 before getting into detail I request
0:53 everyone to please do like and share my
0:55 channel and if you like this video
0:57 please do share it among your friends
1:00 and if you have any queries topic
1:03 suggestions feedbacks you can comment
1:05 below this video or you can mail me at
1:09 this mail ID so let's start
1:12 into the introduction to biomechanics is
1:14 defined as the process of analysis and
1:16 determination of loading and deformation
1:19 of bone in a biological system that is
1:21 it is a response of the biologic tissues
1:24 to the applied lobes and biomechanics
1:27 comprises of all kinds of interaction
1:29 between the tissues and organs of the
1:33 body and the forces acting on them and
1:35 we know that dental implants function to
1:37 transfer the load to the surrounding
1:39 biological tissues and so the primary
1:41 functional design objective of an
1:44 implant is to manage these biomechanical
1:46 loads in order to optimize the implant
1:50 supported processes function and it is
1:52 very important to understand and apply
1:55 these biomechanical principle in each
1:57 and every stage that is from the
1:58 planning stage up to the final
2:01 prosthetic restoration and ignoring them
2:05 inevitably can lead to failure
2:07 next let us see natural tooth versus
2:10 implant biomechanics so in detail about
2:12 this we have already discussed in our
2:15 implant occlusion session so some of the
2:18 points are natural tooth it's anchored
2:20 into the bone by flexible periodontal
2:23 ligament and which is the viscoelastic
2:26 shock absorber which reduces the amount
2:27 of stress transmitted to the boat
2:29 whereas in case of implant there is no
2:33 PDL it is rigidly fixed by functional
2:35 ankylosis and the concentration of
2:37 stresses in implant mainly occurs at the
2:41 Crystal region now again when there is a
2:44 premature conduct or an occlusal trauma
2:47 there is precursor signs in case of
2:49 natural teeth that is a cold sensitivity
2:52 where faces pits drift away and tooth
2:55 mobility and these precursor signs are
2:57 reversible that is they can be corrected
3:00 by occlusal adjustment or a reduction in
3:02 force magnitude which will reduce the
3:04 stress magnitude whereas in case of
3:07 implant the initial reversible signs and
3:10 symptoms of trauma are totally absent
3:13 and these stresses can result in bone
3:15 micro fracture bone loss which
3:17 ultimately leads to Mechanical failure
3:20 of the implant components next the
3:23 elastic modulus of a tooth is closer to
3:25 the Bone than any of the currently
3:28 available dental implant biomaterial
3:31 whereas in case of implant it differs by
3:34 5 to 10 times from the surrounding bone
3:37 structure in case of elastic modulus now
3:39 the greater the difference in this
3:40 flexibility between the two material
3:43 greater will be the potential relative
3:45 motion generated between the two
3:49 surfaces and the endoster region
3:51 next the proprioceptive information
3:54 relayed by teeth and implant also
3:57 differs in quality that is the tactile
4:01 sensitivity is high for natural tooth
4:03 that is it can sense up to 10 micrometer
4:06 particles and it delivers a rapid sharp
4:08 high pressure that triggers the
4:10 proprioceptor mechanism whereas in case
4:13 of implant the tactile sensitivity is
4:16 less that is it can detect only up to 25
4:18 micrometer particles and implants
4:21 deliver a slow dull pain that triggers a
4:24 delayed reaction if any
4:26 the next the surrounding bone of natural
4:29 tooth is developed slowly and gradually
4:31 in response to these biomechanical loads
4:34 whereas in case of implant the bone
4:36 formation is performed by the dentist in
4:40 a much more rapid and intense fashion
4:42 next is about the lateral Force so when
4:43 there is a lateral force or natural
4:46 tooth it is dissipated rapidly away from
4:49 the crust of the bone towards the apex
4:51 of the tooth that is the fulcrum to the
4:53 lateral forces at the apical third and
4:57 this mechanism reduces the crystal loads
4:59 and when there is a lateral Force there
5:03 is a rapid primary movement of 56 to 1
5:05 or 8 micrometer in case of natural teeth
5:08 whereas in case of implant the lateral
5:11 Force gets concentrated at the Crystal
5:13 region this is because there is no
5:15 primary rapid movement of the implant
5:17 only it exhibits a secondary movement
5:20 that is only up to 10 to 15 micrometer
5:23 this again causes concentration of
5:25 stress at the Crystal region so whenever
5:27 there is an occlusal trauma the tooth
5:29 moves to dissipate these stresses and
5:32 strains and after the offending trauma
5:34 is eliminated tooth returns back to its
5:36 original position within the limits of
5:38 magnitude of movement that has taken
5:40 place whereas in case of implant
5:42 Mobility can take place under occlusal
5:45 trauma but when the offending trauma is
5:49 eliminated an implant rarely returns
5:51 back to its original position but
5:54 instead its failure occurs so these are
5:56 some of the points in under natural
5:58 Truth Versus implant biomechanics to
6:00 know in detail you can watch the implant
6:03 occlusion Session One
6:07 the loads applied on implants so excess
6:10 load on an Osteo integrated implant may
6:11 result in mobility of the supporting
6:14 device or it may fracture an implant
6:17 component or body so under function
6:19 there is occlusal load whereas when
6:21 there is absence of function perioral
6:23 forces can happen that is a frequent
6:26 horizontal loads and also mechanical
6:28 loads on abutment due to a non-passive
6:31 processes so biomechanics help us to
6:33 understand such physiologic and
6:35 non-physiologic load and we can
6:38 determine which type of load renders
6:40 more risk and the goal of treatment
6:43 planning should be to minimize and
6:45 evenly distribute a mechanical stress in
6:49 implant system and continuous bone
6:51 now let us see the three basic methods
6:54 of loading in an implant so loading
6:56 simply means applying a force to an
6:59 object and there are three basic methods
7:02 of loading in biomechanics first one is
7:05 compression which involves a stress that
7:08 compacts the structure so compression
7:10 compacts the structure whereas tension
7:13 it involves pulling the structure apart
7:15 and finally Shear involves pushing the
7:17 structure eccentrically and the
7:20 torsional loading involves twisting of a
7:22 structure however when seen in cross
7:25 section torsional loading is essentially
7:27 the same as Shear for an individual unit
7:29 of the structure so these different
7:32 means of loading substantially impact
7:35 the way a structure behaves and for
7:37 bones these loading characteristics
7:39 produces different but predictable
7:42 fracture patterns that is the
7:45 compressive forces compresses an object
7:48 whereas tensile forces pulls the objects
7:50 apart and Shear Force is on implant
7:52 causes sliding now let us see the
7:54 features of compression
7:57 so these compressive forces tends to
7:59 push the mass towards each other and it
8:02 maintains Integrity of bone in plant
8:04 interface and this is the one which is
8:07 accumulated best that is cortical bond
8:10 is strongest under compression and the
8:12 Siemens retention screws implant
8:15 components and won't implant interfaces
8:17 can accommodate greater compressive
8:20 forces than tensile or Shear forces and
8:22 so compressive forces should be the
8:24 dominant one in implant prosthetic occlusion
8:25 occlusion
8:28 so the compressive forces
8:30 helps to maintain the Integrity of bone
8:34 implant interface whereas the tensile as
8:36 well as Shear forces tends to distract
8:40 or disrupt such an interface so Shear
8:42 forces are most destructive that is
8:44 cortical bone is weakest to accommodate
8:46 Shear forces
8:48 so these forces should be less whereas
8:50 compressive forces should be the
8:51 dominant one in plant prosthetic occlusion
8:57 next let us see the stress strain
9:00 relationship so what is stress and
9:02 strain they are terms used to describe
9:04 the ability of an object to withstand
9:07 external forces so when a force is
9:08 applied to a material the internal
9:10 structure of the material undergo
9:13 certain changes which is calculated by
9:16 formula Force per unit area and that is
9:19 called as stress whereas the deformation
9:21 of material caused by the external force
9:24 is called as string now a relationship
9:26 is needed between the applied stress
9:28 that is imposed on the implant and
9:30 surrounding tissue and the subsequent
9:33 deformation which is given by the stress
9:36 strain curve and here comes the
9:38 significance of Hook's law so what is
9:40 Hook's Loop hooke's load dictates that
9:43 stress is directly proportional to
9:45 straight so here
9:49 you can see that initially
9:52 so initially in this graph
9:55 this obeys the hook slope that is stress
9:58 is directly proportional to strain
10:01 and once a certain strain is reached the
10:03 material begins to deform so here you
10:06 can see once the certain strain is
10:08 reached the material begins to deform
10:11 and it will no longer assume its
10:13 original shape when the stress is
10:15 released and this point is called as the
10:17 yield point
10:20 so here you can see up to this stage the
10:23 material shows elastic Behavior but
10:25 after the yield point the material shows
10:27 plastic behavior and at the end this
10:29 point is called as the failure point
10:31 where fracture or failure of the
10:33 material occurs
10:37 so hook slow is the basis for predicting
10:39 the biomechanical properties of implants
10:42 so hooke's law states that stress and
10:45 strain are directly proportional and
10:47 that is seen at the initial portions of
10:54 a number defines the relationship
10:56 between stress and strain for a given
11:00 material during this linear aspect of
11:02 the stress strain curve and that is the
11:05 Young's modulus of elasticity so stress
11:08 is equal to modulus of elasticity into
11:10 strength so basically the modulus of
11:12 elasticity of the Young's moduli
11:15 describes the elasticity of a material
11:18 and it is calculated by dividing stress
11:20 by straight or visually it is the slope
11:23 of the line created under stress strain
11:26 curve through the elastic portion of the
11:29 curve and components with high moduli
11:31 are stiff like stainless steel on the
11:33 other hand low mode line means soft
11:36 materials like ultra high molecular
11:38 weight polyethylene which is used in Orthopedics
11:41 Orthopedics
11:43 so as per the stress trained
11:45 relationship once a particular implant
11:48 system is selected the only way for an
11:50 operator to control the strain
11:53 experienced by tissue is to control the
11:55 applied stress or change the density of
11:58 bone around the implant so we have
11:59 already said in the previous slide that
12:02 closer the modulus of elasticity of the
12:04 implant to the biological tissue the
12:07 less the relative motion at the implant
12:10 tissue interface next let us understand
12:14 the manner in which forces are applied
12:16 to the dental implant restoration and
12:18 also the failure mechanism these are
12:22 important to avoid complications so here
12:24 comes the importance of moment or Torque
12:27 so what is moment.torque it is the force
12:30 which tends to rotate a body
12:33 so in addition to axial Force there is a
12:35 moment on the implant which is equal to
12:39 the magnitude of force multiplied by the
12:42 perpendicular distance between the line
12:45 of action of the force and the center of
12:47 the implant so in this picture you can
12:49 see that this is the
12:52 line of action of force this is the
12:53 perpendicular distance
12:56 and here the moment of torque is
12:58 calculated by the formula f multiplied
13:02 by D that is the distance between line
13:03 of action and center of implant
13:07 multiplied by the magnitude of force now
13:10 the moment loads can be destructive in
13:14 nature and may result in implant bone
13:16 interface breakdown bone resorption
13:19 screw loosening and bar or Bridge fracture
13:25 now there are three clinical coordinate
13:28 axes and a total of six moments May
13:30 develop about the three clinical
13:33 coordinate axis so here you can see in
13:35 the picture they are foreign
13:41 so these are the three clinical
13:44 coordinate axes and a total of six
13:46 moments May develop around these and
13:49 these moment Lots induce micro rotations
13:52 and stress concentration at the crest of
13:54 the alveolar Ridge at the implant to
13:57 tissue interface and which leads
14:00 inevitably to Crystal bone loss and
14:02 there are also three clinical moment
14:04 arms in implant industry that is
14:08 occlusal height can deliver length and
14:11 occlusal width now let us see these
14:18 among the three clinical moment arms the
14:20 first one that is the occlusal height
14:23 which serves as the moment arm for Force
14:25 components directed along the
14:29 ratiolingual axis and mesial distal axis
14:32 now the force component along the
14:35 vertical axis it's not affected by the
14:37 occlusal height because there is no
14:39 effective moment R so when there is a
14:41 force that is direct along the vertical
14:43 axis the perpendicular distance between
14:45 line of action of force and center of
14:47 implant is zero and so there is no
14:51 effective moment arm however the lateral
14:53 loads can introduce significant moment arms
14:55 arms
14:58 and in case of division a bone the
15:02 initial moment arm at the Crest is less
15:04 than that of division C or D bone
15:08 because the crown height its greater in
15:10 division C or D both so the treatment
15:13 planning must take into account this
15:16 initially compromised by mechanical environment
15:21 next the second clinical momentum that
15:23 is cantilever link so cantilever or
15:25 horizontal offset we have already
15:27 discussed in detail in our implant
15:30 protective occlusion session three so we
15:32 know that cantilever processes are the
15:34 ones which are fixed at only one end and
15:37 cantilever extensions or offset loads
15:39 from rigidly fixed implant results in
15:42 large moment load so here is a picture
15:45 that illustrates two implants that are
15:48 placed 10 millimeter apart
15:50 so these are two implants place 10
15:52 millimeter apart and the cantilever
15:54 distance is 20 millimeter so
15:55 so
15:57 when there is an when there is a
15:59 situation like this when two implants
16:00 are designed 10 millimeter apart
16:02 Splendid with a cantilever of 20
16:05 millimeter when a force of 25 lbs is
16:08 applied on the cantilever it is resisted
16:11 by 50 lbs force on the measal implant
16:13 and the distal implant which act as a
16:18 fulcrum has got a force of 75 lbs so
16:21 here it is a condition that is similar
16:23 to class 1 liver and the mechanical
16:27 advantage is calculated to be 2. so to
16:29 know in detail you can watch the session
16:32 3 of implant protective occlusion and
16:34 another greatest determinant for the
16:36 length of cantilever is the magnitude of
16:39 force so patients with severe bruxism
16:41 should not undergo restoration with any
16:48 other important determinant is the
16:51 anterior posterior spread so this is the
16:53 distribution distance between the most
16:56 anterior and most posterior implant so
16:58 this is called as the anterior posterior
17:01 spread and greater the anterior
17:03 posterior spread smaller the resultant
17:05 loads on the implant system from the
17:07 cantilevered forces because of the
17:10 stabilizing effect of the anterior
17:14 posterior distance so as per mesh the
17:16 amount of stress
17:18 will be less when you increase the
17:20 anterior posterior spread that is forced
17:23 by area when the area increases the
17:25 force decreases so in biomechanically
17:27 compromised environments such as poor
17:29 quality bone The Strain to the crystal
17:32 bone can be reduced by increasing the
17:34 anterior posterior spread of the implant
17:37 and an anterior posterior spread that
17:40 minimizes the distal cantilever and
17:43 establishes well distributed four point
17:45 stability will probably contribute to
17:48 both implant as well as prosthetic
17:51 success and clinical experiences suggest
17:54 that distal candle liver should not exceed
17:55 exceed
17:58 2.5 times the anterior posterior spread
18:04 now let us see the recommendations by
18:07 Mish so candle liver length is
18:09 determined by the amount of stress
18:11 applied to the system
18:13 and generally distal candle liver should
18:16 not exceed 2.5 times the anterior
18:19 posterior spread patients with para
18:21 function should not be restored by
18:23 cantile liver regardless of other factors
18:25 factors
18:28 Square Earth form involves smaller
18:29 anterior posterior spread between
18:31 splintered implant and should have
18:34 smaller length cantilever and tapered
18:35 Arch form
18:38 can be restored with larger anterior
18:40 posterior spread and large cantilever design
18:46 the next clinical moment arm is occlusal
18:49 width so widening the occlusal table
18:52 greater will be the force developed to
18:54 penetrate a bolus of food and also a
18:56 restoration that mimics the occlusal
18:59 anatomy of natural teeth often results
19:01 in offset load and also there is
19:04 increased risk of porcelain fracture so
19:07 wide occlusal table increases the moment
19:10 arm for any offset or closer load and so
19:12 in order to reduce the rotation or
19:15 facial lingual tipping you can either
19:17 narrow the occlusal table or adjust the
19:20 occlusion to provide more Centric contacts
19:23 contacts
19:26 so to summarize a vicious destructive
19:28 cycle can develop with the moment loads
19:31 which can result in Crystal bone loss so
19:33 once there is a crystal bone loss
19:35 automatically the occlusal height
19:38 increases and once this occlusal height
19:41 moment arm increase there is increased
19:43 facial lingual micro rotation and
19:46 rocking which again causes more stress
19:48 to the crustal bone which results in
19:51 Crystal bone loss so unless the bone
19:53 increase in density and strength this
19:55 cycle continues and results in implant
19:58 failure if this biomechanical
20:04 next is fatigue failure which is
20:07 characterized by Dynamic cyclic loading
20:09 conditions so there are four fatigue
20:12 factor that significantly influence the
20:14 likelihood of fatigue failure in implant
20:17 industry and they are biomaterials macro
20:20 geometry Force magnitude and number of
20:23 loading Cycles so we have to discuss
20:25 this in detail and we will be continuing
20:28 this in our next session
20:30 so thank you all for watching my video
20:33 please do like share and subscribe my
20:36 channel if you are finding these videos
20:39 useful and if you have any queries topic
20:41 suggestions or feedbacks you can comment
20:43 below this video or you can mail me at
20:46 this mail ID so it's buy from Pro Soha
20:48 until the next session thank you all