The central argument is that the theory of evolution, as presented by mainstream science, is not a robust scientific fact but rather a collection of flawed theories, fabricated evidence, and shifting narratives. The speaker advocates for challenging the onus of proof onto proponents of evolution and highlights perceived inconsistencies and contradictions within evolutionary science.
Key Points
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
Okay so
the theory of evolution Factor fiction
and I want to say something important
here right why is the fact right
something that we need to keep in mind
right now let's leave the definitions of
philosophical definition jogging and all
of the sounds we're not going to get
into that generally when someone says
something is a fact they say that there
is no doubt in that thing
there's no doubt any we agree on it you
know it's it's a fact the author is
where we're not going to get someone in
the future who's coming to come and
disagree that you know what no no water
I'm not sure really that water is wet
but no no it could be sometimes and
sometimes it could not be wet fact is a
fact so what happens is in the
scientific Community what they do is
that they sell you Evolution as a fact
no doubt about that you go to
universities of Southern University so
anything related to biology it's already
a fact
people believe evolution is a fact right
so what I'm going to try to demonstrate
now is it really fact or is it the
opposite of fact is it affection right
and I would say I want to say something
important right there are a group of
people just before we get started I want
to make two points right first thing is
that there are people who've already
made up their minds
if you made up your mind if you if you
were willing to will it to actually open
your mind and to listen and to see what
this person is going to present to me
then this kind of stream I would say is
for you if you already closed up your
mind it doesn't matter what this guy is
gonna say it doesn't matter he's gonna
bring up you know I'm not going to
accept what he says he doesn't know what
he's talking about look at this Arab try
to do this and that right if you already
made up your mind and this stream is not
for you so I'm making it clear and
simple for the people what people are
watching two minutes and then go on the
comments all about this and this and
that watch the full thing once you've
you watch the full thing then say what
you want to say the second thing I want
to say is that what we need to do as
Muslims is very important here we cannot
be on the back foot
we cannot be on the back foot when it
comes to Evolution what do I mean by
that evolution is not our claim
why are we trying to disprove something
which is not our claim to begin with
I'm saying from the beginning if you're
moving from this perspective you've kind
of already lost what you need to do is
to ask the other individual to
demonstrate to you why this is a fact
if I'm talking to someone who believes
in evolution like other than what we're
going to do today if I'm generally
talking to someone who believes in
evolution the owners of the claimant is
on him he's supposed to demonstrate to
me evidences why evolution is true but
what needs to happen yeah what tends to
happen in our conversations we assume
yeah yeah okay
he said we assume evolution is true even
though we don't agree it is and then we
start defending why we don't believe in evolution
I see that's the biggest problem that we
have today right we need to understand
look the other person needs to come and
give me the evidence they must start can
demonstrate evidence to me front of my
eyes look this is the evidence why
evolution is true and then I can maybe
think about okay if you think the
evidence is bringing forward critiquing
it understand that it's like you me
starting a conversation with an atheist
and then him accepting the Assumption
according to his worldview that God
exists and then I ask him disproof God
would any atheist ever accept that no so
why are we what are we doing that's a
good example that's a very good example
why are we doing that you want to say
something yeah no no exactly what you
said I I love the way that you put it
you know if a Christian comes up to me and
and
um they are sorry not Christina sorry
darwinist comes up to me and they want
to put the onus on me
I'm gonna say no the onus is on you
you're the one that made the claim I'm
the one who's silent you're the one
that's claiming there is a universal
common ancestor it's a blind random
process so what you did right now I
think will give a lot of people confidence
confidence
because they know that they can just sit
there fold their arms and they need to
wait for the other side to give the
presenting case and all they need to do
is challenge
absolutely absolutely and this is what
I'm saying this is what we need to do
from from now onwards we cannot be those
people who are like yeah okay evolution
is true let me try to explain it you
already defeated man you already defeated
defeated
like so parallel defeated in a battle we
never we never started anyways sometimes
I do that with the existence of God but
that's a different discussion for a
different day you know but generally
this is the idea the person he's got to
demonstrate to us why evolution is true
now let's move on inshallah to what
we're going to talk about today Okay so
we've got what we call cut and cut
evidence right so I'm putting it in
quotation marks or very important reason
right this is what people in the Darwin
field will present to you as evidence
I I don't know if there's anything else
that we can consider to to be evidence
anyways but let's say this is the bulk
of what is considered to be evidence
this is the main topic this is the most
important things obviously fossil record
uh vestigial organs will go into a
vestigial organs are if someone doesn't
know homology and obviously the natural
restriction is a blind processes that
happen based on your environment for
survival and reproduction Etc uh we've
got random mutations the mutations
happen randomly and all of the story and
then we've got similarities in genes
humans and chimpanzees and different
animals with each other and all of that
right then lastly we're going to talk
about some rational problems that we
have the theory of evolution as a theory
right and I'm going to go into an
important thing later on for I mean by
the Russian problems okay okay let's go
on to the first thing inshallah okay so
the important thing is this Darwin when
he put his theory in chapter six of his
book obviously here Origin of Species
chapter six difficulties in the theory
right he put this chapter about the
problems and difficulties that can come
up with his theory Etc and he said
something interesting here he said but
as this Theory uh innumerable
transitional forms must have existed he
put forward this thing which every
evolution has come comes up to uh comes
up to us with as well I will explain why
they come up to us with this idea they
say that look there's thousands of of uh
creatures there's thousands of animals
thousands of things which have evolved
on a long long long long gradual period
of time and gradual process that took
billions and millions of years why is
this important now because the people
who will deny this today based on
certain individuals they still when we
ask them can you show us a transitional
creature today
have evolved they always use this excuse
of gradualism so when it suits them they
say oh this takes thousands of thousands
and thousands of millions of years but
when it doesn't suit them they say oh
yeah we don't have to believe it it's a
long process and I need you guys to pay
very close attention to because you will
see in everything that they present
there's a contradiction they
self-contradict themselves literally in
every action in the deal okay okay so
Darwin here he said that we need to have
this massive amount of transitional
fossils of transitional creatures that
we whenever we you see here is different
levels here obviously you've got the
Cambrian Etc all of these are the
different levels in in the soil and
because it was a gradual process then
when we go in the first one we will see
the latest creatures that have evolved
when you go deeper and deeper and deeper
you'll find now less evolves creatures
the more you you go deep so this is what
the theory is this is a general
understanding of how the Foster record
works right so Darwin himself knew that
we're not finding all of these
transitional forms so he continued to
say after saying that they must exist so
he is making the claim not us he's
saying that they must exist based on the
idea of graduation gradualism and slow
Evolution Etc then he says why do we not
find them
embedded in countless numbers in the
crust of the earth he's asking a
question on our behalf right we don't
need to ask the question he's asking now
how did he answer the question it is
hilarious how he answered the question
he said I'm gonna talk about that it
will be more convenient to discuss this
question in the chapter on the
imperfection of the Foster record
basically the chapter I said the first
record is not it's not perfect how does
that justify why you what your theory or
anything that you said that has nothing
to justify your teeth amount to the
claim that you guys may make there is
innumerable amount of transitional forms
and creatures we need to find them they
have to be when we when we're finding
all of these creatures we need to be
finding all of these fossils that lead
us for a fact the evolution took place
why are we not finding them right then
we had what we call a very interesting
thing that brought even this but even
more problems and problems on this idea
which is the idea of the camera
explosion right so we've got this layer
here precambria and then Cambrian we've
got something called the Cambrian
explosion we found so many fossils from
that period and all of these fossils
they do not support the idea of
gradualism gradualism and that creatures
took all of this time to evolve on this
we found all of these creatures so we
find this
yeah trilobite sorry thank you so this
trilibri is an example that we found
from the Cambrian Period right this is a
very Advanced creature with multiple
different eyes and it has nothing to do
with the idea that this gradually
evolved and took or this very very very
long we shouldn't be finding in the
caprium period right should be finding
it maybe in the in the territory period
or all one of these different periods
but it should not be in the Cambrian
Period this is one example we find
multiple multiple multiple different
fossils and what did what this did is it
completely destroyed this idea of
gradualism so they started to us with
this idea of gradualism now no longer we
can accept this idea of gradualism they
had to find the solution how can we find
deep within the Earth in that very very
very long period uh this extremely
involved quote unquote creatures how can
we explain this phenomena how can we
account for that then what what we find
we find someone like Stephen J gold I
don't need to say who he is I'm sure he
he's very well known right on his book
sorry let's go back on his book The
Panda's thumb right what he says is it
is sudden appearance of species okay can
you explain can you explain why can you
explain how can you explain so what they
started saying is that you know what
it's not that all of these things have
evolved because we found different
things like ants for example that have
not evolved and all of that right all of
these different fossils from the camera
there's no explanations for him so what
they did is that they shifted the goal
post they said you know what some uh
creatures we they will have sudden
appearance Southern Southern Evolution
quick Southern Evolution while the other
ones will take a gradual and try this
transition without giving any
justifications what is the justification
we found something that goes against our
Theory now we're gonna shift and twist
and change what we were saying into
trying to fit this new information into
our Theory okay but this has a lot of
problems so as we said they're not
giving us why not giving us reasons and
evidence behind them given this idea
that okay some of them are like this and
some of them are like that the second
thing is how
how would an animal or a thing evolve
very quickly Suddenly by itself by
random random processes how does that
happen so you were given the excuse this
is a big issue now right because they
were given the excuse of natural
selection this happens a long period of
time based on the environment and this
and that so how can you account for this
very sudden perfect uh Evolution if you
want to use that term that happens at
the southern at the center at a certain
time suddenly how can you account for
that how can you explain that and what
we would say is it's impossible to
explain for example
animals like giraffes
right what they said is that they didn't
have that long neck
they were trying to eat from the trees
so they were extending their neck
extending externally extending and
through a gradual process their legs
started like stretching you know how
ridiculous these things happen when you
start to actually listen to their claims
right I literally started to stretch the
stress stretch until they started
reaching the the leaves and started
eating from the food now why is the
problem there is if we assume sudden
Evolution are you trying to say to me
that the blood vessels the bones tissues
the heart everything related to to blood
evolved suddenly all together in the
perfect manner the giraffe is not gonna
die let alone now to go to speak about
the the breathing system of the giraffe
and all of these things even
even
Evolution that took place how come that
happen that all of these organs and
everything in the body changes in the
perfect way in the perfect time for the
for that creature to survive without any
external factors
now that's a clear moment to ask Stephen
J gold if he was here you know I would
ask you that question can you account
for how it is possible for an animal
like a giraffe which has all of these
massive changes if you look at the blood
system for a giraffe how the blood goes
from the heart to the brain
in all of this long neck you be shocked
are you telling me that oh just random
chances okay this is the first thing
that we want to talk about okay let's
move on
so the first thing we said is the camera
exponent so what we said here in the
camera explosion is that they did not found
found
so species with the testimony of someone
like Darwin and other people they did
not found those transitional creatures
if they did find them we wouldn't have
anything to to contest anyways
right we would say okay then you've got
all of these different fossils okay that
makes sense okay now we will look into
what you guys are saying okay but they
don't have it so what did what did they
do if we don't have something what do we
do like the Christians do you know some
some Christian you know they make it up
so if I don't have a verse in the Bible
that supports the Trinity we will make
up a verse that supports this Unity it's
the same idea with science we don't have
evidence for this idea what we will do
is that we will make up evidence for
this idea so let's go go on to look at
some of the links in what I would call
clear forgeries with their own uh
testimony and I want to say something
very important look
um all the magazines that I'm going to
put forward here are magazines that
actually support evolution what does it
mean the accept evolution to be a fact
they are a well-accepted scientific
magazines in scientific Community I'm
not going to bring you creationists
quote unquote I'm not going to bring you
books of people who already deny
Evolution I'm gonna bring you their own
testimonies about their own things so if
you're an atheist they accept the
scientific community Unity or you're a
Muslim that you want to say what they
say themselves about their own Theory
we'll go on to look uh one by one so let
me open the first link inshallah just
give me one second and then let me share
my screen okay so and I'm gonna go
quickly because I'm not gonna go into
much details you can go later on you can
guys look at the links and go into much
details of each single fossil and why
it's a fortune right so let me share a
screen for one second here share screen
okay so this is the first forgery here
okay okay this fossil that was announces
them as the missing link
as possible evidence is what
is a forgery okay that's the first link
let's go on to the next link
okay let me stop sharing my screen and
let me share
another link okay I don't know I don't
want to go into too much into these
different because I have so many
honestly right so many uh examples right
okay uh projectile build them famous what
what
build down man in famous fake fossil
okay and all of these things that they
talk about here they were using as
evidences if you open the scientific
textbooks you'll find these things quote
unquote claim to be evidences for
evolution right yeah okay let's go to a
third link
so we're gonna talk about even Lucy a
little bit more in details as well but
let's talk about Lucy quickly now
uh okay so
I don't know it's always these cookies
everywhere you know okay so baboon found
in famous Lucy skeleton right if anyone
knows about the the the the Lucy
skeleton we're going to talk about it in
depth as well the wound sounds are found
in it sorry baboon bones are found in it right
right okay
okay uh
uh
now coming back to the slice let's come
back to the slides for a second yeah
so all of these are articles saying the
same things so I'm gonna save you the
type right I'm gonna save you that some
of the quiet the fossil is not the
missing link you can find even in the
link of the of the thing say some
statements about these things right so
all of these are talking about the same
thing all of all of it are forgeries
right we have an example here Science
magazine uh claiming that there was a
specific thing in the end it's a pig
tooth they draw that actual creature the
whole the whole creature you know based
on one two one tooth they drew an actual
creature saying that that creature was
called X Y and Z he was working on going
around here he's doing X Y and Z and
then oh sorry we discovered it's a big
two right let me actually open that like
let me open that link for a second so it
is like uh
honestly like embarrassing that's what I
would say
what those people do when we find their
mistakes they try to even justify for in
a different way like for example look
you say apparently not a man or ape but
you're claiming it is it is the missing
link and all of that so what happened
now what happened now right okay let's
come back let's open the slides again
sorry yeah okay this is another example
here right this there was a part of a
skull that they found
and and they drew a whole picture again
and all of that and they said the
transitional creatures Etc in the end
there was a skull of a donkey right by
the way the time I'm not even
the mocking that magazines putting a man
holding a sticker with a donkey head
right mocking them mocking the
scientific I mean this was a
transitional creatures between him Etc
so it's a skull of a donkey right and
they called it the discovery of the of
the century at that time it shows how
these people use all of these false
evidences to try to justify as if they
have evidence for what they say when a
reality they got nothing supporting what
they say right we've got haircuts
drawings right if you speak to someone
today as I said to you someone who a
little bit will learn about Evolution
understand that if you talk to them
about drawing all he's going to say to
you oh this is a long time ago this few
days that's what they say but these are
used in in medical textbooks yeah until
until 2013 this link I have is showing
you how many textbooks it is use them up
to 2013. even though this idea was
refuted in 1909
so you know Darwin's time you know so
this idea is refuted Darwin's time to be
forgeries but they're still using today
in scientific textbooks a medical
textbooks until 2013. are you now coming
saying to me that they did not know this
basic information that me someone who's
not specializing in the medical field
loans so I know that this is a forgery
but the people who are doctors
professors that are writing books
medical Fields professors teaching
students they don't know that this is a
fortune and they still have it in their
in their medical textbooks or or or is
it that they know but they don't care
or is it that they know this is fake but
they don't care and they want to push
forward whatever they believe in the the
other idea that we had of the human tail
right say humans are born with tails and
you know these Tales used to be uh from
uh apes and from all of these different
types of animals and in the end it is a
disease called lepoman there is many
different names for that specific it's
skin disease where you have an extra
part of the skin coming out yeah so what
is it that I'm trying to show here
is when they do not have evidence for
something because they worship this
thing as a religion that's why I compare
them with Christianity they worship it
to be a religion and their idea and
their understanding this is like a
religion so if I don't have evidence for
something I already believe in
then I will make up evidence to support
or I I believe okay
yeah and I'll try to maybe inshallah
maybe comment with my channel for all of
these links there's so many links so
I'll try to gather all of these links
for the people you know one by one and
then people can look at if they they
want to look at each other okay uh we've
got now moving on to how it's called
fictional characters but first I want to
ask this question maybe you can tell me
maybe if you know this common knowledge right
right
do you know when they say is the first
appearance of homo sapiens
how long ago
do you know
um well our species they would say
around 200 000 years
200 000 years right one one one
195 uh five give or take which is what
you just said so this is what they say
okay so this is the common knowledge
brother support this is what the people
are spreading this is if you go to a
person this is what they will say to you
but we'll move on now to talk about this
above it okay well I'm gonna say also
I'm calling them fictional characters
but but not now so nature magazine
research is what you said here right
areas appearance is 195 give or take
five years it's in this article by
Nature right
now we have a next article here by by
Nature actually let me open this article
now we have a next article
that I want to look at here so uh let me
share my screen sorry apologize so we
said what 200. yeah now they found one
that is 300 000 years yeah yeah yeah now
what do they say Moroccan fossil rearranges
rearranges
Homo sapiens three so what they found
the or by the way these 200 years that
they had let me close this for a second
these 200 years Gap that they had
they have the whole family tree based on it
it
so in the day now we have to understand
the significances of these changes that
I'm putting forward now it's not as
simple as okay yeah it was 200 going to
be 300 no no the whole theory is based
on that right the whole evolution of the
human is based on that because they have
this graduate and they have this periods
this person was in this specific period
of time this this uh animal transitions
from the from here to there it gradually
evolved in this specific way so it's not
just simple changes this has to arrange
rearrange the whole family tree okay so
they said 300 000 years let's move on to
the the next thing that they say okay
let me share my screen so it's not 300
000 years actually it's according to this
this
is the first Europeans remains in Spain
it is actually 708 780
000 years
so what we what do we have to do now
more rearranging what do you have to do
we have to rearrange again right it's
for another chair right okay let me
share another example right another
example and people don't talk about
these things because they only talk
about the 200 years this is what they
teach in universities this is what they
talk to students about this is the old
information that they still recycling
until today right okay
the share screen again another face look
look how they're putting it you know
look how they're trying to beautify it
another face in our family tree actually
it's dated to 3.5 million years ago
you know so it's just another face in
our family tree okay they're trying to
put it in a way as if you know what
there is no issues in that we don't have
a problem you know okay we were just
telling you this and the reality is not
this but okay let's do another one okay
because I wanna read a little bit of
what it says here as well this is their
screen the oldest member of the Human
family found voila okay you know uh now
let's look
to my is the tip of the iceberg
uh on that could sync our current ideas
about human evolution it's not me saying
that it's the guy who found it you know
okay so I think that says wood yeah it's
not me I'm not saying that anybody who
thinks this isn't going to get more
complex is it learning from history
right when I went to medical school in
1963 human evolution looked like a ladder
ladder
he says the ladder stopped from Monkey
to man through a progression of
intermediate is slightly less applied
okay so why is he trying to say here
what is he trying to say he's trying to
say okay we had when I went to to
University we had this family tree now
because of all of these things that
people are trying to avoid because he
says that you cannot avoid this you
cannot escape this this is don't think
this is not an issue this is what he's
saying someone who believes in evolution
was propagating Evolution he himself is
telling you this is an issue he himself
is telling you this is rearranging all
of what we had as you said musical
chairs we arranged rearranging
everything so first we found a problem
with the idea of the first first record
they make it up
do you have any idea which is a
contradiction they change the premises
they change whatever they used to
believe in into something completely
different and they claim as if all there
is no issues right now this is another
example of nature magazine file 1.8
million we found the hand a human hand
Bond right
1.88 million so it's not 200 years it's
not 300 it's not 780. it's not 3.5 it's
not 6.7 right and also in Asia because
some of them are saying all of these
ones are found in Africa no no there is
an age there is a Chinese poem that is
found that is also older that is in the
link that I put forward okay so what do
we have here is fictional stories or
fictional trees or fiction and
transitional creatures in fictional
times that they put forward to the
people and they start drawing and they
start rearranging for you one by one
telling you that look this is now the
tree of the human human family you know
I think the the the the tree of of
Pokemons have been rearranged less than
this you know this is how I would say
this would be a in the arrange more than
these people rearrange okay let's move
on to the next fictional characters
right so we have here fictional
characters I'm not gonna even bother to
read the first name yeah that's why they
called it Lucy they changed the name
from that name to Lucy right so those
are the faint four main one ones that
they use today they moved away from most
of the other ones and now they focus on
those four main ones so many offenders
and Lucy right so Lucy here there is a article
article
from Science Daily it says there is
actually it has an abe-like brain and
the rest of the bones that they have
they actually uh collected from
different things so collecting a bomb
from here a bomb from there bomb from
different country and then assembling
them together to try to have a human
looking like creature that evolved from
from something today you can do that you
can bring a little head of a monkey and
a hand of a human being a tale of and
they gather them together and say that
this was a creature that was evolved
right so they themselves they say
actually no that's not uh from Homo
sapiens three years actually it has an
air black break okay we move to the Homo
habilis the same thing abe-like bones
right we move on to the homoeretics or
Alexis it's the same thing there's a
link here it talks about syncing the
homo erectus it's a whole research
showing you how the homo erectus
is sinking you know because it's from
erectile erecting so they they're even
making pads about it they didn't even
mocking their own evidences right so
you're thinking there is no evidence for
for the homo erectus as people are
claiming right and here in this nature
article it says it could be from Homo
sapiens actually it could be included in
Homo sapiens tree it's not really from
the it's not really homo right this is
actually from the Tree of the homo
sapiens right you look at another
research actually let's open uh distress
on life science let me open this one
we can look at it for a second
because I want to read some of the
phrases that they have in there and I
want everyone to bear with me by the way
I know look I'm gonna present you a lot
of things but point I want to do is this
is I don't want to leave anyone excuses
later on coming and saying okay but what
about this but what about that I'm gonna
give you an an a crazy amount of
forgeries a crazy amount of Lies a crazy
amount of what they claim to be the
evidence how they themselves admit that
it's not evidence for anything and they
still come to you trying to convince you
that this is some sort of a accepted
fact okay let's look here sharing this
one okay homo erect is facts about the
upright man yeah let's look about the
facts that they say no thank you okay I
want to see something important here let
me see the part I want to talk about okay
okay
200 is homework had longer English oh
yeah but what I wanted to say is this do
you see this part called lineage
yeah I opened the same link a while ago
this part part here called lineage was
in the beginning but what they did is
they took this part and they changed it
with this I'll tell you why because
you're gonna start reading now it says
right why did they remove it from the
beginning of the research because they
don't want people to be reading this in
the beginning right the lineage of
evolution in history for Americans and
other homies which is unclear and it has
been muddied further by by recent funds okay
okay
Homo erectus was once thought to have
their evolved from an idiot human
ancestor known as the Homo habilis
somewhere in East Africa is the start of
it okay false information however there
is much disagreement about whether these
populations are actually homo racist
confusing methods more after analyzing
the new skull okay scientists also do
not agree about Homo Erics is directed I
can go all their own right point is they
don't want that to be in the first page
because if that is in the first page
what you see is just further confusion
upon further confusion okay so let's
close this please let's go back to the research
research
and I'm sure look people have heard
these names this is what atheists come
up with talking to you about the assume
they existed I've seen you talking to
maybe an atheist who believes in
evolution he starts mentioning these
names to you as if their facts right or
wrong since you actually they've done
that and they've actually learned it
okay but this is what your nature
magazines are saying this is why your
own research is say okay now uh the homo
I'm not gonna even mention that I'm not
gonna bother right the last one this is
called the demise of that what they
whatever that species is called it's the
demise it's the research here showing
how it is it is 151 research reviewed
put in that research that I'm putting
for you showing you how that is it is
the demise now of this idea of the
existence of the hormone in the
intenders ETC but point is this if you
go to any University today
they are teaching you these things are
facts yeah they're not teaching you that
these things are not are not are
contested they're confusing they
actually oh these are not bones of of
humans they're actually bones of apes
they're not actually uh what we used to
say to you it's not actually true all of
these fictional drawings are movies that
they make literally movies right it's a
movie about Lucy that the baboon skip
now it's okay there's a whole movie
about it showing you how she used to
live and what she used to do and all of
that is coming from an a break
I have a collection of different fossils
from different animals from different
things now these fictional characters
why am I calling them fiction characters
because they literally are Imagine
constructing a full character from a
tooth that later on you found that it's
a it's a pig tooth and you you have this
fictional character come I even children
they have less less imagination than
this to be honest you know even DC
movies they have they are more plausible
than these things that they're putting
forward to be honest they're more
plausible okay let's move on
now we have something called vestigial
organs why is vestigial organs vestigial
organs and I want to say something
important here vestigial organs is the
claim that there are organs that are
useless they're not useful for for
survival and reproduction they're not
useful for that animal because they're
left over of a previous previous
ancestor like for example if me I had a
tail for example yeah seriously stale is
not helping me survival in production
but actually it's coming from previous
ancestors that's why he's still there so
that is the claim
now the first thing I want to put
forward and it's a very important thing
to look at when it comes to this idea of
residual organ it is based on circular reasoning
reasoning
why is it based on circular reasoning
now that's very important to look at now
because they claim
these uh organs are vestigial they use
this why because evolution is true and
evolution says that all organs must be
used for survival and reproduction
because evolution is through the
vestigial organ and because the residual
organ the evidence the evolution is true
no I don't seem to look at this circle
people don't think about that but this
is circular reasoning literally yeah
they say the seasonal organs are
evidence for evolution I'm not making
this way they make this claim let's read
it here uh why evolution is true right
by Jerry a coin right he has in page 60
what does he say he says we humans have
vestigial preachers proving that we
evolved the most famous is the appendix
right which by the way I just put the
research from 2018 showing how it is
very useful in fact there is a research
under saying how appendix say it could
save your life how it actually saves you
from certainly disease but the point is
that this is circular easily they're
claiming their vestigian because
evolution is true and their procedure
therefore they're proving evolution is
true how are we not challenging this
nonsense you know are we allowing these
nonsense to go by you know okay so
that's the first thing I want to say
this is this is secularism okay now the
claims that they make is also lies like
the appendix for example is a claim
another claim is the inverted drought in
the eye
which is very sophisticated very useful
and I'm putting the research here
showing you how it is super useful for
the human eye and then you've got
someone like Richard Dawkins in his book
uh the blind watchmakers claiming it's
useless as evidence for evolution
because it's a vestigial organ according
to him okay you've got the well pelvic
bones and I want to see something very
important we've got research that that
link that I put we've got a research 150
years ago
saying that they are useful for mating
and then we have a book today biology By
Ravens and Johnson taught in universities
universities
2017 Edition still has the information
now my question is can you please tell
me I already mentioned one example like
this right but can you please tell me
have they missed a researched that film
that what even that research I'm putting
now that is reasons they're cutting
their rises from 1500 yeah well sorry
150 years ago are you telling me those
professors and universities are supposed
to be editing these books teaching them
to students they do not know that there
is 150 years ago research showing how
these pelvic bonds are actually used for
for mating for for the whales therefore
they're no longer as they claim
vestigial organs 2017 this book is is it
is being taught in universities
okay and you've got someone like Richard
Dawkins he's claiming oh look this is
evidence for evolution you got Stephen J
gold is saying the same thing all the
people that you see you hear the biggest
names for propagating Evolutions if you
open their books these these are the
things they're using brother sister I'm
not bringing you something from last
century yeah I'm bringing you that what
they write in their books claiming this
is evidence for evolution and I'm
bringing you that all magazines showing
you how these quote-unquote evidences
are actually not evidences and how
they're lying ignoring research 150
years ago completely as if it doesn't exist
exist
completely now look uh let me open this
link to show you an example of what they say
say
a mission open one more link
uh sorry okay let me get to where I
stopped okay let's open this link here
so many links to open for you guys but I
don't I don't want to keep this you know
for thousands and thousands of fees and
by the way this I want to be honest this
is not in an in-depth research that I
put forward by the way I I organized
this this because brothers who recently
just told me that he wants me to come on
I literally organized all of this today
a few hours I put everything together if
you really want me to put an in-depth
research of the amount of flies that
these people put forward I can do that
but why this is just few hours today
I learned this today I can go into the
dates so you'll be putting all of this
information today this is not an Indian
research but this is a basic surface
level showing you how these people are
lying okay let's go here and share and
share this thing let me show you one
thing here interesting I want to show
you what they say what they're saying okay
is all in the hips and you study new
study look that we already we said 150
years ago there is information about
this you study that that turns a long
accepted evolutionary assumption on its
head that's what they say brothers and
sister says no what I'm saying this is
what they're saying in their magazines
it's saying they're selling this
evolutionary assumption while 150 years
ago I'm telling you this information has
been already people have been sleeping
and they know this information you know
the actual professors they know this
nonsense okay
now we've got another example of snakes
pythons you got a book Essentials of
biology again taught in universities
2018 Edition
there's a research 50 years ago already
showing how the the handle what they
call the hand limbs are actually hooks
used for fighting and mating by the
pythons while they will claim to you to
you today in 2018 in their books and
what you learn at University probably
some people watching this they might be
learning in the University yeah I want
you to open your textbooks that you
you're learning from and you go to the
page of the city organs and you will see
these things I'm thinking about in these
books yeah 2018.
50 years ago there is a research debunk
40 sorry 40 years ago it is a research
the bank in that but they're still lying
in 2018 in their books claiming that you
know what this is evidence is the social
organs you've got pink doing Wings
you've got the ostrich wings I could go
on and on and on right point is as I
said I just collected some of them I
don't want to go into extensive data
point is there anything that they will
claim to is vestigial organs there is a
function for it and there is research
demonstrating that there is a function
for it but they will lie and they will
sell claim this evidence like I just
showed you Jerry a coin in his book
evolution is true claiming to you the
the famous he says the most famous is
the appendix he's claiming this is the
famous that people are sharing that the
appendix is useless and I've already got
research assuring you that it can save
your life
you know so by that oh their own nature
magazines okay let's move on
let's move on okay now we've got
something here called homology right uh
maybe some people from here the homology
or not but okay what is the idea of
homology homology is the idea that the
similarities between creatures in
anatomy are due to common descent okay
is this my claim no no I'm bringing you
what they say in their books okay
Essentials of biology 2018 Edition page
247 they say the unity of anatomy is
evidence of common ancestor I'm not
saying that they're saying that in their
books right and they see here homologous
structures suggest common common
derivation right so they're claiming
that biology bereavements and Johnson
Essentials of biology with 2018. this is
recent things I'm not claiming something
from the last century yeah okay so that
means what the more similar the
creatures are the closer they are are in
relation am I correcting my
understanding brother uh doesn't that
mean the closer they are in the looks
based on this information you're muted
by the way if you want to say something
yeah go ahead yes sir sorry sorry I was
muted you're in a flow and I don't want
to stop you but yeah no problem because
I mean what you're saying so far is is
the concise way to explain these points
because the deeper you get it can
actually get more confusing but that
that's the Crux of it where you just
explained okay here inshallah okay let's
move on to the next Point okay
okay so here what do we have can you can
you sorry spell these two because it's
easier for me to save yet you can spell
the two the two in on the topic
marsupials and plus uh Pleasant tools
can you explain to the people the
difference between the two
okay so you have two different types of
mammals here and these are
geographically distinct right you get
some in uh remote parts of the world
which are completely unrelated to the
others yet they have similarities in
terms of their traits and anatomical
features which to the to the untrained
eye you would say these two creatures
are related but it's actually according
to them independent convergent evolution
it's not actually due to Common ancestry
and that totally smashes this idea that
similarities are due to common descent
because we have to remember everything
goes back to Concepts so its
similarities are due to common descent
that means that differences must be due
to separate ancestry and that means that
if there's similarities that are found
that are not due to common descent then
that undermines their entire thesis
um this is something I funnily enough
had a debate yesterday with um Skydive
Phil in the park
um because they don't tell us about
these probabilities they don't tell us
about the assumptions that they're
making because the fact is if you start
off with assumptions whatever
conclusions you make are going to be
based upon those assumptions so a lot of
these examples that you're actually
giving these examples only go on to
highlight the assumptions that they have
in the beginning why they are erroneous
but even if Muhammad you never had these
examples it would not change the
conclusions that we're currently
arriving at absolutely and the the basic
difference between these types and two
types of animals is for example
kangaroos they have the baby they still
hold it in in the in the sack and then
it still feeds and comes back until it's
ready to come out while other animals
will give birth and the animal will be
able to go by itself and after after the
birth is given right so that's the
difference between these two types of
animals and they look the same now the
same book that I called it biology by
Arizona Johnson in the previous page
that said to us here that these
homologous structures they are evidence
for common descent the same book has
given you an image of others that look
exactly the same but it claims that
they're not for common they said what
bigger contradictions can you have
reading this book I don't know how
people are opening these books to
reading them and they're not realizing
you know what man what's going on here
in the previous video telling me the
more they look similar the more evidence
that they are for common descent this
end the picture they gave me later on oh
they look exactly the same but you know
what they're not actually from common
they said right you've got all of this
picture that I put here the picture next
to it showing you where they separate it
right so according to them go ahead yeah
no I just wanted to add to that point
that the same problem that you just
highlighted exists at the genetic level
okay moving on now like first they said
to us what similarities are due to
common descent we give them an example
the homology doesn't work and they're
lying and that's what most laymen they
think oh these two things look the same
therefore that's what the guy was saying
to me in the video if you watch it oh
they look the same before they're from
common descent that's what laymen think
as evidence right okay so they say to us
in the same book they contradict
themselves okay moving on now we said
similarities are due to Common distance
we've got this research from nature
showing you how they separated 160
million years ago those two types of of
animals and that they're not uh close to
the rated because they separated a long
time ago okay so the question is why are
they homologous
they cannot find an explanation so they
make up a new thing they call it
conversion Evolution we've got the
solution now the answer to that question
it's actually it's not just just similar
to the view to communities but some
animals because of the environment they
will evolve to look like other animals
even though they're not from common
ancestry so which one is it our similarities
similarities
or are animals based on their
environment looking the same as other
animals because the environment shaped
them to be this way okay the answer is
oh some animals are like this some
animals are like that sorry we found
this problem so now we're gonna make
this new Theory and we're gonna call it
conversion Evolution there you go okay
now we move on we say to them okay what
about the bats and whales
they're not homologous in in their
anatomy in their outside structure and
they are from different from different
environments the conclusion according to
what you said to me because this
environment or a structure that they are
closely related right why are they
similar according to your own testimony
why are they similar why do they have
this Eco location system both of them
functioning the same way into these two
different things one is a land animal
once they see animal
now can you explain this to me can you
explain can you give us an explanation
of of how to to kind of reconcile
between between these things they said
oh yeah there is actually a new type of
convergent evolution that you'll find in
this research down here well actually
you can get this type of similarities
between animals even though they're not
from the same environment and even
though that they're not a homologous in
their shapes so how long are you going
to be moving the goal first you know you
took the goal box with your home
literally I don't know what you're gonna
do with the goal post anymore right and
we asked the question why are animals
similar to bats living in similar
environments did not develop the
ecosystem why is it only the whales that
do that while the animals that live
around the same environments as the bats
and they are similar to it did not
develop that same equal location system
this is can you can you explain that to us
us
so what we see is what
they keep contradicting themselves every
two seconds right okay is that it no no
no no that's not it's not done okay
let's move on they got something that we
call the the secret Fish Secret fish is
it's a very interesting example why
because it's not just two animals that
look alike that you can explain all just
similar environments no no it's one fish
one animal that produces different
species that are exactly identical to
the same type of fish in a different
Lake in a different environment
so two minutes ago you're telling to me
there's something called conversion
Revolution that can explain two animals
that look similar and this and that okay
what about now one producing different
fishes in different environments in
different lakes that are almost
identical how can you explain that
how can you explain that by blind
natural selection and blind processes
that you claim are not directed and they
happen by themselves because of
evolution the animals tries to survive
before it happens so how can you explain
this happening to us what do they say
and you name parallel Evolution no the
answer the question is is that some of
these fishes there is something new
called parallel Evolution and parallel
Evolution happens this takes place but
actually the interesting thing that they
said is that in that research they said
to you it's not just random blind
natural selection it is a guided one
that research I'm putting for you here
in the nature magazine they will say to
you developmental bias and natural
selection work together rather than
selection being free
to transfer transverse over any physical
possibility it is guided along specific
this guy did the Statue and said they
just put a fancy name parallel Evolution
and they they say to you there has to be
guided and they don't give you an
explanation who's guiding it who's
guiding that fish to produce the same
exact uh species or almost identical to
the same other fish that in a completely
different location that you claim to us
it is based on your environment you have
the the evolution taking place
what are you guys saying you know I'm
okay I don't know how these people lie I
need subhanallah I don't know how these
people they have they can come with a
straight face and safety Evolution as a
fact I seriously don't know okay okay
moving on
they have something called random
mutations what they claim is the
mutations around them this is a whole
list here of research showing you how
mutations are not random let's go
through some some of them right let's go
through some of them them telling you
themselves Now by people who are
creationists so believe in evolution
yeah this research is in nature yeah
it's that it's not by people who believe
evolution is already true okay
let's go to showing you some of the how
these mutations that they claim to be
random are nowhere near being random
okay if you open this okay let me share
my screen
give you one example okay
okay
research here published by Nature okay
791 citations you can go into it it
talks to you about the origins of
mutations and how they're not uh uh
random how they're not random mutations
okay so an example let me show you
another example
uh let me open this one sorry
okay uh
okay
okay new study
new study yeah it's two thousand knot
2022 okay by Harry Baker okay 2022. new
study proves first uh the claim first
but we're going to prove that nowadays
now I just showed you a research before
like showing opposite to that first
evidence of non-random mutations in DNA
it's not the first but this is the the
lie that they will bring for you is this
is this is re just Recent research yeah
last year literally right it was just in
in February okay
uh what else let me show you this by the
way the same research that I just showed
you which is the research of the fish
cichlid fish in that same research they
will say to you that here I put it here
variation is not random that they will
claim to you that's right I already told
you is guided so it's not random
mutation it's not blind natural
selection all of it is guided it's not
random okay let's see here let's watch
this video of Dennis Noble who who knows
what Dennis Noble is can do you know who
Dennis Noble is brother okay
okay
you know can you tell us just a brief
before you can even yes right yeah yeah
um I'm just going to briefly describe
him but just before that sorry I keep
muting myself but I don't wanna you know
because when someone yeah so
yeah with Dennis Noble um before I
introduce him I just want you to say that
that
um I actually sent him a email
um because he's really into music and
this type of thing so I said to him that
you know here is something for you to
listen to and there's actually the call
to prayer is actually the the beautiful
beautiful
someone did and he was so moved by it
right so you know some of these
academics they're so Dr there's so much
into dry boring stuff that sometimes you
have to give them you don't even have to
give them like deep down I just gave him
this thing and he listened to it so
anyway about Dennis Noble Dennis Noble
is a anti-darwinian evolutionist okay
now this is hard for people to believe
like what on Earth is is an
anti-darwinian evolutionist he's
basically someone that doesn't accept
the modern synthesis he doesn't accept
this idea of neo-darwinism and his many
assumptions he's actually said
neo-darwinism in terms of most of his
assumptions have has actually failed and
he is a professor at Oxford University
he's challenged Richard Dawkins to a
debate which he didn't actually accept
Dennis Noble
um from my understanding and this is uh
on the public record as well he is not a
Christian he's not a Muslim he doesn't
actually believe in any religion yet he
is somebody that is well respected and
as you pointed out he's against this
idea that random mutations along with
selection can create the by the
biodiversity that we actually have uh he
considers the mechanism to be
insufficient and therefore he's pushing
out the ideas like the ones that you're
just speaking of
um by actually challenging the modern
synthesis and I want to say one thing
think very important he still believes
in evolution that's why I want people to
to to to keep in mind we're not bringing
you again I said to you I'm not going to
bring you creations yeah so I could come
and see Jesus guys that's a
well-respected academic as he said at
Oxford University so many different
things he inverted he invented even
certain things right certain uh I don't
even have them now if you go if you just
Google his name you'll see he's
inventing new things even people are
using mathematical formats and this and
that you can go into into the the the
the research that he's done and all the
inventions that he made but let's listen
to what he says yeah let's listen listen
to what he says okay let me share my
screen and it's a very very
quick and short and beautiful as they
say video yeah okay I want everyone to
confirm if the voice you can hear the
voice okay
uh okay so this is what this is a
conference conference that happened and
said International Conference that
happened in China yeah and he was
speaking in that International
Conference it happened in 2012. okay
uh let's just make sure that everyone is here
here
okay can people hear I want to see is
the people in the chat if you can hear I
okay let's play the video there okay
see what he says it's difficult if not
impossible to find a genome change
operator that is truly random in its
action within the DNA of a cell all
careful studies of mutagenesis find
statistically significant non-random
patterns of change so okay he says what
all research this is not a guy that is
going to come out I'll say something
that people are gonna allow it to say
yeah I want people to keep that in mind
he's saying all the research yeah I put
that in your mind very well yeah they
all have patterns there is no such thing
as random mutations if an idiot comes to
you as issue it is random mutation let
me just show him that video yeah so
there's no such thing as random
mutations Okay let's listen to Asus yeah okay
okay
so my first conclusion is this not only
is mutation not random that was one of
the essential assumptions of the
neo-dalwinian synthesis but proteins at
least some of them did not evolve via
gradual accumulation of mutations okay
so here if you are here future gradual
accumulation when it comes to proteins
and here if you it's any idea called
random mutations in in the genes yep so
there is no such thing as random
mutation and as I said to you anything
comes to consists to these random
mutations he's an idiot he did not study
the research and I put three already
links here yeah you don't believe me I
just put you four four links couple of
them are from uh wonderful is from Life
Science couple of them from nature these
are all accepted scientific magazines
all of them are of people who support
evolution okay it's not from Creations
okay now the question is that directed
by you
would they ever say directed by God
that's an impossibility in the in the
scientific field so what do they say
it's actually directed by cells in the
first research I showed to you here that
I said to you by Nature the first one
the claim is actually the cells are
smart and intelligent and at least
that's how you know prior to their
creation they already had these codes
how to be organized and and they are
they started functioning on them after
the creation one idiotic thing to say
some others receive to us microbes
actually there's a and they've invented
a new term called microbial intelligence
you know what these microbes are
intelligence and they know how to have
these mutations these mutations
happening because microbes are smart
another research SEO by nature is
bacteria bacteria is intelligence
intelligent bacteria and that's how it's guided
guided
what kind of who who buys these things
who literally listens to this nonsense
and says the evolution is true who
listens to this rubbish and says the
evolution is true okay let's move on
from that
let's move into the genes now yeah let's
go to the pool of the genes we already
spoke about random mutations and how it
doesn't exist let's go a little bit to somebody
somebody
genes and genetic similarities This
research I put here right which is by
the National Library of Medicine of
medicine.gov right well I accepted there
is no doubt about it everyone hears
about it 90 and 98.8 identical between
human and chimpanzees everyone hears
This research right or wrong if you
speak to anyone in in the basic even
Layman if you go to them and you say to
them the 99 or 98 they'll all say to you
yeah the 98 or 99 identical the question
is now all humans are shampoo and
chimpanzees actually
98.8 identical is that claimed true now
how do we understand this by going into
the methodology that these people use to
come up with this conclusion of 98.8
identical now and I want people to pay a
close attention with me yes can I can I
just say something just before we get
into that I just want every everybody
watching to just be aware of something
which is super important
Muhammad's gonna go over the reasons why
the comparison of 98 is misleading and
it's Lying by omission and this is well
known and established however
I want to give a counter factual what if
it's not 98.8 percent what if it's a
hundred percent right or 99.99 and
they're not wrong similarities in of
themselves do not prove anything you
need a transformation being done by a
mechanism and you need the origination
probability being close to zero without
these two things even if the similarity
was even closer than 98.8 percent it
would make no difference to the claim
between human chimp ancestry being true
or actually being false because you need
the background information to do that so
just as the Upshaw what I'm saying is
similarities simply mean similarities
they don't mean anything else unless you
have background assumptions
absolutely and as a simple example I
make to that guy you know all iPhones
look the same they are from the same
manufacturers you know this is just
because two things are identical does
not change this idea that you know what
we don't want to go into into specific
days let's go to the genes now let's
talk about the genes okay so in that
research why is that research highly
problematic or sorry what is a
conclusion highly problematic I'm gonna
go into into details now first you can
open a book it's called bio informatics
and functional genomics this is what I
started in universities right I'm not
teaching I'm not bringing you my own
thing this is what it's taught in
universities if you go to the Third
Edition if you go to the chapter third chapter
chapter
introduction someone says I'm making
this up I'm giving you the refresh okay
they say that two genes or proteins are
homologous if they evolve from a common
ancestor so they say that they are
homologous if
we accept the assumption that they
evolve from a common ancestor that's
what the book is saying okay now when
you go under the same book there's a
section called scoring metrics scoring
metrics the scoring metrics that they
use in those studies they say most
database searching methods such as blast
blood blast hmmer there's many
difference depend in some form on the uh
in in some form on The evolutionary
inside of the day off model so they're
saying to you the systems that they're
using to look for those similarities
already assumes the evolution is true
already assumes you and the chimpanzee
are from common ancestors already
assumes that you're both your genes are
homologous before doing the session it
already assumes so it moves from humans
and chimpanzees our homologous if we
consider them from a common ancestor two
humans and chimpanzees are homologous
therefore they are from a common
ancestry the same idea of the second
second reasons I displayed area when it
comes to the vestigial or the same type
of nonsensical things this is a bit
confusing but I will explain it when I
go into this I'll give an example point
is it's no longer an assumption or sorry
it's evidence they already assume that
it is the case before they do the the
research rather than doing the reasons
to come to the conclusion that it is
true or not they already assume it's
true and they use the method assumes is
True to this to prove what they already
believe that's the point that I'm trying
to make okay so in this study why was it
problematic first they used three
million genes out of three billion
so literally one out of 1000 genetic
codes only in that research now within
one out of 1000 in the research that
that they use they ignore 28 differences
and seven percent differences between
humans and chimpanzees which is actually
75 so if we were to take that 35 percent
it's like 65 similarity is that already
and given the fact that we're only
taking three percent sorry three million
for out of three billion of the genetic codes so first they're
of the genetic codes so first they're ignoring majority of the genes number
ignoring majority of the genes number one number two they're excluding that
one number two they're excluding that which they don't like which is 28 and
which they don't like which is 28 and seven differences and they say in the
seven differences and they say in the same study why they excluded it they say
same study why they excluded it they say we excluded it because there's no
we excluded it because there's no similarities oh you don't say you know
similarities oh you don't say you know so that's
so that's similar yeah
similar yeah and you bring that which is similar and
and you bring that which is similar and you claim that there's identicality 98.8
you claim that there's identicality 98.8 and now they do this beautiful very
and now they do this beautiful very beautiful nice things that they call it
beautiful nice things that they call it deletion substitute substitution and
deletion substitute substitution and insertion
insertion and in every it is between 1 to 65 codes
and in every it is between 1 to 65 codes in the sequence
in the sequence that they will do deletion substitution
that they will do deletion substitution and insertion in and I will explain what
and insertion in and I will explain what deletion substitutional insertion and
deletion substitutional insertion and we're going to go into that okay and I
we're going to go into that okay and I want to say some one I want to make a
want to say some one I want to make a very important Point here the research I
very important Point here the research I put inside a Scientific American if you
put inside a Scientific American if you just search Hidden Treasures in in junk
just search Hidden Treasures in in junk DNA right we used to have this stupid
DNA right we used to have this stupid belief that there's something called
belief that there's something called Junk DNA and it's useless and all of
Junk DNA and it's useless and all of that it's a docus and these people were
that it's a docus and these people were talking about it and today we know this
talking about it and today we know this is nonsense and all types of genes are
is nonsense and all types of genes are useful and important for the human being
useful and important for the human being okay now the important thing is this is
okay now the important thing is this is that changing one gene one genetic code
that changing one gene one genetic code in certain situation can be fatal you
in certain situation can be fatal you conduct cannot exist as a human being
conduct cannot exist as a human being right now the point is they're claiming
right now the point is they're claiming thousands if not millions of changes in
thousands if not millions of changes in the in these studies but they will do
the in these studies but they will do the ignore them they do insertion
the ignore them they do insertion deletion substitution they ignore all of
deletion substitution they ignore all of these different things right and they
these different things right and they substitute literally they change they
substitute literally they change they delete certain uh genetic codes they
delete certain uh genetic codes they delete them even though as I said you
delete them even though as I said you one of them can be fatal they delete
one of them can be fatal they delete them in order for them to push this
them in order for them to push this narrative that is actually 98.8
narrative that is actually 98.8 identical okay so this is the nonsense
identical okay so this is the nonsense that they do to come up to this
that they do to come up to this conclusion 98.8 is that it no right what
conclusion 98.8 is that it no right what they do what they did that's something
they do what they did that's something they ignored all the insertion and
they ignored all the insertion and deletion that they did and they only
deletion that they did and they only left the substitution so they ignored
left the substitution so they ignored all the percentages that they did
all the percentages that they did insertion and deletion and depth they
insertion and deletion and depth they completely ignored there and they only
completely ignored there and they only put what they did substitutions so what
put what they did substitutions so what do you mean by substitution and
do you mean by substitution and insertion let me explain
insertion let me explain and why are we saying that the user's
and why are we saying that the user's methods already assume Evolution so look
methods already assume Evolution so look here if you can see in the in the
here if you can see in the in the picture that I have the image that I
picture that I have the image that I have first we have the chimp right so
have first we have the chimp right so let's assume these genes that I have on
let's assume these genes that I have on the top are the genes of the chimp okay
the top are the genes of the chimp okay and let's look down here we have the
and let's look down here we have the human
human so the genes between the chimp and the
so the genes between the chimp and the human are completely different can you
human are completely different can you see brother support starts with c and
see brother support starts with c and then it's it's even longer right as I
then it's it's even longer right as I said to you so it starts with C this one
said to you so it starts with C this one starts with t it doesn't start with C
starts with t it doesn't start with C right this one ends with g this one ends
right this one ends with g this one ends with a who can go on this many
with a who can go on this many differences between the two so what they
differences between the two so what they have what they do when they use these
have what they do when they use these methods they already assume Evolution
methods they already assume Evolution they assume that there is a common
they assume that there is a common ancestor
ancestor and then they add this type of genes in
and then they add this type of genes in the middle that they brought from their
the middle that they brought from their pocket right that has no evidence for it
pocket right that has no evidence for it and they assume that this is a common
and they assume that this is a common ancestor between the human and the ship
ancestor between the human and the ship yeah so they bring additional data that
yeah so they bring additional data that there is no evidence for and what they
there is no evidence for and what they do now is that they use that as evidence
do now is that they use that as evidence to align between the chimp and the him
to align between the chimp and the him and the human so if they found extra
and the human so if they found extra genes dissect you they can either do
genes dissect you they can either do deletion so they'll completely remove
deletion so they'll completely remove the CNA if they find there's a
the CNA if they find there's a difference between the C and the T they
difference between the C and the T they will do what we call substitution they
will do what we call substitution they will change the T into a c or the C into
will change the T into a c or the C into a t and they will claim that there is a
a t and they will claim that there is a similarity or or they would do insertion
similarity or or they would do insertion if there is more down and there is less
if there is more down and there is less in the top let's add one more gene on
in the top let's add one more gene on the top and let's add one other Gene in
the top and let's add one other Gene in the end so we can have the same
the end so we can have the same identical process
identical process so what did they do they do this
so what did they do they do this insertion deletion and substitution and
insertion deletion and substitution and this is the problem they've already
this is the problem they've already assumed that we have evolved from the
assumed that we have evolved from the same uh common ancestor that's why they
same uh common ancestor that's why they add this selection of genes in the
add this selection of genes in the middle and that's why they use as as a
middle and that's why they use as as a stick
stick to combine or to explain the differences
to combine or to explain the differences that are between us and them and as I
that are between us and them and as I said to you if you remove one gene in
said to you if you remove one gene in certain cases you can die so they
certain cases you can die so they they're removing thousands and millions
they're removing thousands and millions of genes depending on how big the study
of genes depending on how big the study is so they're not only doing all of this
is so they're not only doing all of this nonsense to cover up to this conclusion
nonsense to cover up to this conclusion but they're ignoring all the other
but they're ignoring all the other studies that says otherwise so when you
studies that says otherwise so when you come to anyone they'll say serious 98.8
come to anyone they'll say serious 98.8 here same magazines penis these are a
here same magazines penis these are a world renowned magazines okay 98 the
world renowned magazines okay 98 the difference is actually 90 96 actually
difference is actually 90 96 actually it's 95 no actually 77 actually 70 the
it's 95 no actually 77 actually 70 the question is why are they all different
question is why are they all different the answer is simple they're all using
the answer is simple they're all using different methods One is using black one
different methods One is using black one is using blast only uses hhmer one is
is using blast only uses hhmer one is doing more in session on the other one
doing more in session on the other one is usually more than each other if we
is usually more than each other if we were actually 98 this is what science is
were actually 98 this is what science is science is brother support right it is a
science is brother support right it is a experiment repeatability and
experiment repeatability and falsification right if we were actually
falsification right if we were actually 98.8 every study that is done welcome
98.8 every study that is done welcome with the conclusion that we're 98.8 this
with the conclusion that we're 98.8 this is how science work and then we will say
is how science work and then we will say that actually this is a scientific
that actually this is a scientific reality that we are 98.8 but because of
reality that we are 98.8 but because of this nonsense that they're doing and
this nonsense that they're doing and because of all of these different
because of all of these different methods of the games that they're
methods of the games that they're playing they're coming up with different
playing they're coming up with different conclusions they're ignoring any other
conclusions they're ignoring any other research that would say less and and
research that would say less and and they're doing all of these games of
they're doing all of these games of inception deletions of such and there's
inception deletions of such and there's many other things I just brought a thing
many other things I just brought a thing because I don't want to bore you with
because I don't want to bore you with the amount of nonsense that they do when
the amount of nonsense that they do when they try to pick the genes that look
they try to pick the genes that look like each other and the G's that do not
like each other and the G's that do not look like each other okay you want to
look like each other okay you want to say something before I move on
say something before I move on no no you know the point that you're
no no you know the point that you're raising here I think because some people
raising here I think because some people they'll look at these particular
they'll look at these particular pictures they look at the insertions and
pictures they look at the insertions and the deletions and the different numbers
the deletions and the different numbers you're going over and they'll get
you're going over and they'll get confused but I think a way to similar a
confused but I think a way to similar a way to summarize it is they are
way to summarize it is they are subjective in how they come to their
subjective in how they come to their conclusions they can pick and choose
conclusions they can pick and choose what they want and because of that
what they want and because of that that's why you have all these
that's why you have all these discrepancy and even if these
discrepancy and even if these discussions were not just picking and
discussions were not just picking and choose the change yes the institution
choose the change yes the institution they completely change the genetic
they completely change the genetic makeup so that's very important it's not
makeup so that's very important it's not just speaking and choosing that's
just speaking and choosing that's different yeah it's it's super important
different yeah it's it's super important and and what we have to realize about
and and what we have to realize about whenever it comes to any comparison
whenever it comes to any comparison between
between um you know the human genome and the
um you know the human genome and the chimpanzee genome the scientists who's
chimpanzee genome the scientists who's studying the human genome and the
studying the human genome and the chimpanzee genome and they're doing the
chimpanzee genome and they're doing the studies take the names of each one of
studies take the names of each one of these scientists who are putting
these scientists who are putting together these papers and interview them
together these papers and interview them before let's just say hypothetically
before let's just say hypothetically before they did the experiments and
before they did the experiments and asked them do you believe in human
asked them do you believe in human chimpanzee every single one of them will
chimpanzee every single one of them will say yes so the thing is it's a foregone
say yes so the thing is it's a foregone conclusion they already believe it and
conclusion they already believe it and it's just about fitting the data to make
it's just about fitting the data to make it appear that the the the similarities
it appear that the the the similarities less or more than they previously
less or more than they previously thought so no one's no one's and this is
thought so no one's no one's and this is this is super important brothers and
this is super important brothers and sisters nobody is coming to the evidence
sisters nobody is coming to the evidence from a perspectiveless perspective they
from a perspectiveless perspective they already have it clear in their head that
already have it clear in their head that Universal common ancestry is true and
Universal common ancestry is true and therefore they are not objectively
therefore they are not objectively coming to this data they are simply uh
coming to this data they are simply uh coming to it with their uh what was
coming to it with their uh what was known as their relatedness in philosophy
known as their relatedness in philosophy of science and that's why these
of science and that's why these conclusions are absurd
that's what I'm saying why am I building up with all of that because they already
up with all of that because they already thought this is a reality is a fact so
thought this is a reality is a fact so that whatever method they use that's why
that whatever method they use that's why I open their own textbooks what they
I open their own textbooks what they teach them their own universities is
teach them their own universities is they already use these methods if you
they already use these methods if you open this research I showed you use
open this research I showed you use blood if you open a science research
blood if you open a science research with the same exact percentage but
with the same exact percentage but different types of genes they apply the
different types of genes they apply the same method but they're also using blast
same method but they're also using blast again they're using all of these
again they're using all of these different methods that already assume
different methods that already assume the truth of evolution and they add all
the truth of evolution and they add all of these different data like for example
of these different data like for example to simplify very simply to to any Layman
to simplify very simply to to any Layman if I say Muhammad eight
if I say Muhammad eight camel meat
camel meat what they would do is that because they
what they would do is that because they want these two statements to be
want these two statements to be identical Muhammad ate camel meat camel
identical Muhammad ate camel meat camel ate Muhammad meat they won these two
ate Muhammad meat they won these two statements to be identical so what
statements to be identical so what they're going to do is he going to
they're going to do is he going to change camel with Muhammad in the
change camel with Muhammad in the position are they gonna do a
position are they gonna do a substitution and they will change the
substitution and they will change the positions or they will do a deletion of
positions or they will do a deletion of Muhammad he will come a little in there
Muhammad he will come a little in there until the deletion of the other Capital
until the deletion of the other Capital they put Muhammad to come up with the
they put Muhammad to come up with the same conclusion even though these two
same conclusion even though these two statements are completely contradictory
is complete opposite right but they will do these methods now to simplify very
do these methods now to simplify very simple for the people right rather than
simple for the people right rather than doing all of this they are they will do
doing all of this they are they will do substitution in Search and deletion and
substitution in Search and deletion and they would say to you look it is 100
they would say to you look it is 100 identical now this is actually 99
identical now this is actually 99 identical by this method I can make
identical by this method I can make anything 100 identical literally I can
anything 100 identical literally I can make any Gene between any human and
make any Gene between any human and anything is 100 right that's why you
anything is 100 right that's why you have this banana and human being 50 uh
have this banana and human being 50 uh similarities because of the methods that
similarities because of the methods that they use it just depends on which method
they use it just depends on which method that they use to come into similarities
that they use to come into similarities between these two two different things
between these two two different things and you can say any amount that you want
and you can say any amount that you want to say 96 95 77 70 whatever you like you
to say 96 95 77 70 whatever you like you can say
can say yeah and an additional point that I want
yeah and an additional point that I want everybody to just keep in mind is that
everybody to just keep in mind is that before Darwin there was Carl Linnaeus
before Darwin there was Carl Linnaeus Carl Linnaeus was a Swedish scientist
Carl Linnaeus was a Swedish scientist who put together a taxonomy the way that
who put together a taxonomy the way that we have it in terms of all these
we have it in terms of all these different organisms being uh put
different organisms being uh put together in these categories and he put
together in these categories and he put humans and chimpanzees together because
humans and chimpanzees together because of their similarities and Anatomy but he
of their similarities and Anatomy but he didn't believe they had a common
didn't believe they had a common ancestor so it's it's pretty bloody
ancestor so it's it's pretty bloody obvious that things are similar but that
obvious that things are similar but that doesn't mean they have a common ancestor
doesn't mean they have a common ancestor and the other thing to keep in mind and
and the other thing to keep in mind and this is something that atheists they
this is something that atheists they pull out as if it's some sort of Miracle
pull out as if it's some sort of Miracle they say well if humans and chimpanzees
they say well if humans and chimpanzees are not related why are they genomes
are not related why are they genomes similar and the answer to that is why
similar and the answer to that is why wouldn't their genomes be similar
wouldn't their genomes be similar because they are anatomically similar we
because they are anatomically similar we would expect to be similarly absolutely
would expect to be similarly absolutely it is the same I was saying before about
it is the same I was saying before about the vestigial organs right it is the
the vestigial organs right it is the already the Assumption the evolution is
already the Assumption the evolution is true and the organ can be only useful if
true and the organ can be only useful if it is for survival and reproduction
you have Beauty Allah I can accept with you that they're completely useless for
you that they're completely useless for survival and reproduction and still
survival and reproduction and still there's a purpose purposes purpose is
there's a purpose purposes purpose is beauty Allah created it in that way for
beauty Allah created it in that way for for the beauty for them to look more
for the beauty for them to look more beautiful for them to look more amazing
beautiful for them to look more amazing so even if I were to still man their
so even if I were to still man their argument except that they're not useful
argument except that they're not useful for survival in production we can find
for survival in production we can find an alternative explanation right
an alternative explanation right yeah and also I just want you to add a a
yeah and also I just want you to add a a beautiful Point related to what you said
beautiful Point related to what you said because what you said is is absolutely
because what you said is is absolutely beautiful
beautiful when it comes down to the points that
when it comes down to the points that they're making they cross over from
they're making they cross over from biology into theology okay
biology into theology okay okay
I need to I need to get this presentation they said this is beautiful
I'll send it to you as I say it's a quick one I could have gotten more
quick one I could have gotten more detail but I don't want to worry the
detail but I don't want to worry the people you know I don't know yeah but
people you know I don't know yeah but you know you know these presentations
you know you know these presentations Muhammad they're very important because
Muhammad they're very important because whenever we're talking to atheists we
whenever we're talking to atheists we need to have them ready we need to have
need to have them ready we need to have these references ready absolutely that's
these references ready absolutely that's why I have them ready yeah
why I have them ready yeah I have them the links Whatever Whenever
I have them the links Whatever Whenever they come to you they claim that there's
they come to you they claim that there's random mutation already slap them with
random mutation already slap them with research showing that there's no random
research showing that there's no random mutation and then slap them slap them
mutation and then slap them slap them with the video that I showed you and
with the video that I showed you and that's the end of it right you don't
that's the end of it right you don't need to to debate too much of that they
need to to debate too much of that they come to you the first record I want
come to you the first record I want people to this is a very important point
people to this is a very important point they will come to you where's the
they will come to you where's the evidence for everyone they'll say to you
evidence for everyone they'll say to you the Foster record you just you just say
the Foster record you just you just say the word what in the false record is
the word what in the false record is evidence for what you say that's what
evidence for what you say that's what you're supposed to ask you've got to
you're supposed to ask you've got to peel one layer back say to them what is
peel one layer back say to them what is evidence they'll say all these things in
evidence they'll say all these things in museums which is all Lucy and all of
museums which is all Lucy and all of them
them all of these things in the national
all of these things in the national museum I think here in London uh they're
museum I think here in London uh they're showing you all of these these pills of
showing you all of these these pills of the well and they say to you these are
the well and they say to you these are residual organs this nonsense I'm
residual organs this nonsense I'm showing you this is what they're using
showing you this is what they're using in this magazine this fictional type of
in this magazine this fictional type of skeletons that they're put in there
skeletons that they're put in there right they come to the Layman who
right they come to the Layman who doesn't know anything about Evolution
doesn't know anything about Evolution they come with this nonsense so you have
they come with this nonsense so you have to be prepared as as Believers you know
to be prepared as as Believers you know okay let's move on inshallah now we've
okay let's move on inshallah now we've done now with with this everything which
done now with with this everything which you out call scientific
you out call scientific I've demonstrated now what what did I do
I've demonstrated now what what did I do let's go back to the beginning
let's go back to the beginning what did I do
what did I do I've demonstrated that whatever they
I've demonstrated that whatever they call fossil record or evidence for
call fossil record or evidence for evolution is in reality evidence against
evolution is in reality evidence against them right so we've demonstrated the
them right so we've demonstrated the fossil record is actually evidence
fossil record is actually evidence against Evolution we put forward the
against Evolution we put forward the Cambrian explosion we put forward how
Cambrian explosion we put forward how these species are are are actually
these species are are are actually evolving and in very quick periods and
evolving and in very quick periods and how it's impossible for it to happen on
how it's impossible for it to happen on a long period sorry if it's not on a
a long period sorry if it's not on a long period of time it's impossible and
long period of time it's impossible and how the Cambrian explosion completely
how the Cambrian explosion completely refuse this idea I put forward all of
refuse this idea I put forward all of the fabrication oh by the way that I can
the fabrication oh by the way that I can go on and on by the way oh just some 13
go on and on by the way oh just some 13 only Links of some of the applications
only Links of some of the applications that they put forward to to try to
that they put forward to to try to support the the Foster record okay so
support the the Foster record okay so that we move on from the full circle
that we move on from the full circle decision organs we put forward how these
decision organs we put forward how these are all lies these organs organs are not
are all lies these organs organs are not vestigial how it's even circular
vestigial how it's even circular reasoning that you don't even take that
reasoning that you don't even take that into consideration to begin with because
into consideration to begin with because it assumes already evolution is true and
it assumes already evolution is true and when we say why do you assume Evolution
when we say why do you assume Evolution story they will say to you the first
story they will say to you the first letter code you go to the first record
letter code you go to the first record you go to universities you have to be
you go to universities you have to be very careful with these people because
very careful with these people because they he jumped from one to another so
they he jumped from one to another so you refute all of them to make them very
you refute all of them to make them very clear that okay there is no evidence for
clear that okay there is no evidence for you calling evidence right homology I'm
you calling evidence right homology I'm blindness we showed that homology is not
blindness we showed that homology is not evidence it's actually the opposite as
evidence it's actually the opposite as we showed with the cichlid fish we
we showed with the cichlid fish we showed how natural selection is not
showed how natural selection is not blind and it is guided they're not
blind and it is guided they're not giving us an explanation how it is
giving us an explanation how it is guided right we show that there is no
guided right we show that there is no such thing as random mutations we should
such thing as random mutations we should research from their magazines from their
research from their magazines from their own beliefs how there's no such thing as
own beliefs how there's no such thing as as a random mutation we showed how
as a random mutation we showed how similarities in genetic makeup is made
similarities in genetic makeup is made up okay this engineering makeup is a
up okay this engineering makeup is a concept that is made up so the question
concept that is made up so the question is now
is now why do I get certain people trying to
why do I get certain people trying to say let's harmonize evolution in Islam
say let's harmonize evolution in Islam bro harmonize what what I think of
bro harmonize what what I think of evolution you want to harmonize which
evolution you want to harmonize which one which which type of evolution do you
one which which type of evolution do you want to harmonize which nonsense that
want to harmonize which nonsense that they said that they took that they
they said that they took that they changed that they want to harmonize this
changed that they want to harmonize this whole theory is a bunch of garbage that
whole theory is a bunch of garbage that is put on top of each other if you have
is put on top of each other if you have a trash can why would I harmonize the
a trash can why would I harmonize the trash can with Islam and I wanted this
trash can with Islam and I wanted this is very important but they try to take
is very important but they try to take away is the acceptance in the heart of
away is the acceptance in the heart of the believer you know before all of this
the believer you know before all of this nonsense of evolution if we go to the
nonsense of evolution if we go to the 1800s and we go to a Layman we say to
1800s and we go to a Layman we say to him look at the trees look at the ants
him look at the trees look at the ants look at these animals how their evidence
look at these animals how their evidence is for God
is for God none of them would object none of them
none of them would object none of them they would say yeah that makes sense
they would say yeah that makes sense okay all of these things are evidence
okay all of these things are evidence that has to be a maker that guided them
that has to be a maker that guided them to do that that's why for round
to do that that's why for round when when he asked
when when he asked who's your lord almost
who's your lord almost Allah
is the one who is given everything it's shape of creation it's creation and then
shape of creation it's creation and then guided it Allah is the one who's given
guided it Allah is the one who's given everything is shape is creation and then
everything is shape is creation and then guided it this is the Lord that we
guided it this is the Lord that we worship why is the evolution being put
worship why is the evolution being put forward because it goes against this
forward because it goes against this idea this natural innate thing in the
idea this natural innate thing in the human being to when he looks around he
human being to when he looks around he knows there has to be a Creator maker
knows there has to be a Creator maker for all of that right so what did we do
for all of that right so what did we do today we showed how this whatever
today we showed how this whatever rubbish nonsense that they're calling
rubbish nonsense that they're calling evidence it is not evidence for them
evidence it is not evidence for them rather it is evidence for against them
rather it is evidence for against them and they have to explain to us who
and they have to explain to us who guided this mutation these genetic
guided this mutation these genetic things are not random mutations how
things are not random mutations how these mutations guided mutations
these mutations guided mutations directed mutations happening how this
directed mutations happening how this natural selection happening in different
natural selection happening in different environments or organize how it's
environments or organize how it's happening why the the the the all of
happening why the the the the all of these species evolved quickly I'm not on
these species evolved quickly I'm not on a prolonged period of Time how are they
a prolonged period of Time how are they evolving I'm not and and all of these
evolving I'm not and and all of these changes are happening in the body and
changes are happening in the body and there is no one controlling them you
there is no one controlling them you have to explain all of that and you have
have to explain all of that and you have to give us an explanation now it is on
to give us an explanation now it is on them to explain these things to us and
them to explain these things to us and as I said too if I'm speaking to someone
as I said too if I'm speaking to someone who lives in English I'm not going to go
who lives in English I'm not going to go into all of these it is still much for
into all of these it is still much for him I'm just going to say why do you
him I'm just going to say why do you believe in evolution you know start
believe in evolution you know start showing me your evidence to your
showing me your evidence to your research a one by one why he's
research a one by one why he's presenting on whether you right this is
presenting on whether you right this is a simple way to deal with it okay so
a simple way to deal with it okay so that's what we've established now now
that's what we've established now now moving on to to what we call
moving on to to what we call it's a very important thing
it's a very important thing that we need to keep in mind now the
that we need to keep in mind now the rational problems with this idea of uh
rational problems with this idea of uh of uh
of uh Evolution right and by the way I'll put
Evolution right and by the way I'll put number two as number one but I change
number two as number one but I change them I'm gonna start with number two
them I'm gonna start with number two then instead of number one okay
then instead of number one okay the theory
the theory or oh no sorry number one is is the is
or oh no sorry number one is is the is the correct thing
the correct thing yeah number one is the correct thing
yeah number one is the correct thing number one remember they're very similar
number one remember they're very similar in the explanation of what I want to say
in the explanation of what I want to say uh so
uh so yeah number two let's start with number
yeah number two let's start with number two okay number two it is not
two okay number two it is not falsifiable the theory of evolution is
falsifiable the theory of evolution is not science
not science actually it's linked to the first point
actually it's linked to the first point that I want to make right there is to do
that I want to make right there is to do science they're linked
science they're linked the theory of evolution is not science
the theory of evolution is not science you cannot falsify the theory of
you cannot falsify the theory of evolution why I've already demonstrated
evolution why I've already demonstrated two examples in in this tree I've
two examples in in this tree I've demonstrated to you whenever there's uh
demonstrated to you whenever there's uh something that comes up that goes
something that comes up that goes against whatever they leave they change
against whatever they leave they change it they change the goal post they come
it they change the goal post they come up with a new name a made-up name to try
up with a new name a made-up name to try to explain whatever happened which means
to explain whatever happened which means that there is nothing in that theory
that there is nothing in that theory that is falsifiable to begin with and
that is falsifiable to begin with and this is a huge rational problem that
this is a huge rational problem that makes it it's not science to begin with
makes it it's not science to begin with why because they rely on the
why because they rely on the presuppositions of naturalism everything
presuppositions of naturalism everything has to be explained through natural
has to be explained through natural processes they don't accept that there
processes they don't accept that there could be anything unnatural
could be anything unnatural metaphysically explains the phenomena
metaphysically explains the phenomena that happens based on that false
that happens based on that false assumption that they already started
assumption that they already started with the theory it cannot be falsified I
with the theory it cannot be falsified I already showed you that with the circuit
already showed you that with the circuit fish I've already showed you that with
fish I've already showed you that with the with the Foster record how when when
the with the Foster record how when when we the camera explosion happened they
we the camera explosion happened they change it how how the the homology when
change it how how the the homology when we show them the homology is not due to
we show them the homology is not due to common ancestors they change it how we
common ancestors they change it how we show them it's not due to environment
show them it's not due to environment the change they change the name every
the change they change the name every evidence that they would put forward
evidence that they would put forward they will change and they will claim as
they will change and they will claim as if the theory is still valid all they're
if the theory is still valid all they're going to say oh some of them happens
going to say oh some of them happens this way you cannot explain anything he
this way you cannot explain anything he didn't bring evidence or anything so
didn't bring evidence or anything so anything which you will try to put
anything which you will try to put forward against evolution is not
forward against evolution is not falsifiable which by default
falsifiable which by default disqualifies Evolution from being a
disqualifies Evolution from being a scientific theory because evolution is
scientific theory because evolution is not a scientific theory to begin with
not a scientific theory to begin with Evolution and its Crux and its
Evolution and its Crux and its understanding it's not a scientific
understanding it's not a scientific theory why because it's pseudoscience it
theory why because it's pseudoscience it is not something that you can see you
is not something that you can see you can observe I cannot observe species
can observe I cannot observe species changing from one another I it cannot
changing from one another I it cannot happen and they claim because of
happen and they claim because of gradualism we already defeated this idea
gradualism we already defeated this idea of gradualism but they will still use it
of gradualism but they will still use it as evidence oh yeah okay because of
as evidence oh yeah okay because of gradualism you cannot see okay you claim
gradualism you cannot see okay you claim that there are some species who can
that there are some species who can evolve quickly why we're not seeing them
evolve quickly why we're not seeing them today why are no species today evolved
today why are no species today evolved with quickly so we can observe them and
with quickly so we can observe them and see the changes that take place right so
see the changes that take place right so it is pseudoscience because it's not
it is pseudoscience because it's not under the scientific method it's not
under the scientific method it's not under experimentation repeatability and
under experimentation repeatability and falsification I cannot experiment under
falsification I cannot experiment under a species that's changing from one to
a species that's changing from one to another I cannot repeat the experience
another I cannot repeat the experience and I cannot falsify the theory because
and I cannot falsify the theory because whatever you come up with you will claim
whatever you come up with you will claim it is something else as all based on
it is something else as all based on pseudoscience like I showed you all of
pseudoscience like I showed you all of this idea of Homo habilis Homo erectus
this idea of Homo habilis Homo erectus all of that they have like chapters of
all of that they have like chapters of stories oh the homo happily who's
stories oh the homo happily who's working in this part of the region he
working in this part of the region he made the homo all of this fictional
made the homo all of this fictional stories it's not science that's not how
stories it's not science that's not how science is conducted you don't find a a
science is conducted you don't find a a tooth and then say that there's this
tooth and then say that there's this creature existed and he was walking he
creature existed and he was walking he was mating and he was in this region
was mating and he was in this region based on finding a tooth that's not
based on finding a tooth that's not science that is now using you can call
science that is now using you can call it philosophy call it whatever you want
it philosophy call it whatever you want but the side the the theory of evolution
but the side the the theory of evolution is not a scientific theory to begin with
is not a scientific theory to begin with that's something that we need to look
that's something that we need to look into and whatever science that they're
into and whatever science that they're using is already refuted right so it's
using is already refuted right so it's the first two two ideas that I'm putting
the first two two ideas that I'm putting for and this is very important the
for and this is very important the reason behind the demonstration that we
reason behind the demonstration that we put forward is to make this idea clear
put forward is to make this idea clear in the minds if something is
in the minds if something is unfalsifiable you cannot ask me to
unfalsifiable you cannot ask me to falsify it to begin with that's why I
falsify it to begin with that's why I you have to ask them for the evidences
you have to ask them for the evidences for them claiming it is true to begin
for them claiming it is true to begin with because all of the evidences are
with because all of the evidences are refuted and and they're all manipulated
refuted and and they're all manipulated so if I have a building that is falling
so if I have a building that is falling apart you cannot focus on which part of
apart you cannot focus on which part of the of the rocks that are problematic
the of the rocks that are problematic the whole building is falling apart and
the whole building is falling apart and if there is no evidences for it it's not
if there is no evidences for it it's not science to begin with
science to begin with that's why whenever you go to one thing
that's why whenever you go to one thing they will move on to a different thing
they will move on to a different thing to a 13 or 14 right now another thing is
to a 13 or 14 right now another thing is the idea of Randomness we've already
the idea of Randomness we've already refuted there is no blind natural
refuted there is no blind natural selection or random mutation but the
selection or random mutation but the idea of Randomness itself Randomness
idea of Randomness itself Randomness doesn't exist
doesn't exist Randomness doesn't exist in reality you
Randomness doesn't exist in reality you cannot prove to me that Randomness
cannot prove to me that Randomness exists Randomness is basically the lack
exists Randomness is basically the lack of our explanation if I flip a coin it's
of our explanation if I flip a coin it's not 50 50 I just do not know how much
not 50 50 I just do not know how much pressure I'm putting in either I do not
pressure I'm putting in either I do not know the gravity I do not know which
know the gravity I do not know which side I'm pushing the coin if I were to
side I'm pushing the coin if I were to know all of these factors then there is
know all of these factors then there is no such thing as Randomness therefore
no such thing as Randomness therefore they cannot the whole theory is based on
they cannot the whole theory is based on Randomness and we've refuted already the
Randomness and we've refuted already the pillars of Randomness random mutation
pillars of Randomness random mutation and all of that and if idea of
and all of that and if idea of Randomness itself is wrong you cannot
Randomness itself is wrong you cannot base your your theory on something which
base your your theory on something which doesn't make any sense because nothing
doesn't make any sense because nothing is random everything is happening in a
is random everything is happening in a causal chain according to your beliefs
causal chain according to your beliefs if you're a naturalist so you cannot
if you're a naturalist so you cannot pick and choose and clear my natural
pick and choose and clear my natural list when it comes to this part when it
list when it comes to this part when it comes to this one I'm not going to
comes to this one I'm not going to accept naturalism I'm going to claim
accept naturalism I'm going to claim that there is this hidden force is
that there is this hidden force is called chance and Randomness right so
called chance and Randomness right so there's no such thing as cold Randomness
there's no such thing as cold Randomness the whole theory is build Builder
the whole theory is build Builder assumptions as we said the tree of life
assumptions as we said the tree of life is based on the Jesus and homology
is based on the Jesus and homology and we showed that the genes and
and we showed that the genes and homology have nothing are not evidences
homology have nothing are not evidences for anything homology is not evidences
for anything homology is not evidences for common ancestry and the genes are
for common ancestry and the genes are not uh similar as they claim that they
not uh similar as they claim that they are so where this whole idea of tree of
are so where this whole idea of tree of life come from it all falls apart
life come from it all falls apart a biogenesis it is an assumption they
a biogenesis it is an assumption they cannot explain where is the start of I
cannot explain where is the start of I didn't even go into that I can go into
didn't even go into that I can go into details I don't want to right what is
details I don't want to right what is the start of all of that where is the
the start of all of that where is the start of the village how did carbon
start of the village how did carbon start to grow in hands and the leg and
start to grow in hands and the leg and hands and legs started walking around
hands and legs started walking around and we've got what we have today
and we've got what we have today you wanted to say something
can I mute because you're muted yeah but your flow man you flow is good I don't
your flow man you flow is good I don't want to mess around with it okay okay
want to mess around with it okay okay and then the last thing I want to end up
and then the last thing I want to end up is this is is the idea of the changes or
is this is is the idea of the changes or the one before the last the idea of the
the one before the last the idea of the changes in science
changes in science right they would claim that all of these
right they would claim that all of these changes all of these articles that you
changes all of these articles that you provided is evidences for us because it
provided is evidences for us because it shows how science is is this is the
shows how science is is this is the biggest nonsense that they will come up
biggest nonsense that they will come up with right that's why I left it as the
with right that's why I left it as the last Point never accept this garbage
last Point never accept this garbage from them this is true if you have
from them this is true if you have already pillars foundations of the
already pillars foundations of the theater are undisputable
theater are undisputable and then you've got branches that
and then you've got branches that sometimes happen that needs explanation
sometimes happen that needs explanation then you might explain in and everything
then you might explain in and everything shall we that's what science is do not
shall we that's what science is do not make them come and break the whole thing
make them come and break the whole thing is nonsense and because size is changing
is nonsense and because size is changing we're going to change the nonsense every
we're going to change the nonsense every day a bit by bit and this is science do
day a bit by bit and this is science do not be fooled by that Muslims right
not be fooled by that Muslims right because this is a very common nonsense
because this is a very common nonsense that they will come up with they will
that they will come up with they will come and say this is science and science
come and say this is science and science is changing that's why no no no no no
is changing that's why no no no no no Habibi it's not that it says that you've
Habibi it's not that it says that you've got no evidence to begin with you've got
got no evidence to begin with you've got no foundation of the theory you've got
no foundation of the theory you've got nothing that is well established so we
nothing that is well established so we can base on it the theory and then look
can base on it the theory and then look of explaining certain things to begin
of explaining certain things to begin with so never accept this nonsense of
with so never accept this nonsense of the of what they would call changes of
the of what they would call changes of science right and let's go now to the
science right and let's go now to the last thing inshallah okay the last thing
last thing inshallah okay the last thing I want to say is how these people
I want to say is how these people explain what they say you've got someone
explain what they say you've got someone like Richard Dawkins who would try to
like Richard Dawkins who would try to explain abiogenesis by aliens
explain abiogenesis by aliens I wanna I wanna just highlight the
I wanna I wanna just highlight the psyche of these individuals right why do
psyche of these individuals right why do I want to highlight the psyche of these
I want to highlight the psyche of these individuals some people will come and
individuals some people will come and say why if you've got all of this
say why if you've got all of this evidence why don't you win the Nobel
evidence why don't you win the Nobel Prize man just go in
Prize man just go in demonstrate all of this I win the lower
demonstrate all of this I win the lower price the reason is those people already
price the reason is those people already believe it and they don't want to
believe it and they don't want to believe in anything else Evolution to
believe in anything else Evolution to them
them equals no creation and because Evolution
equals no creation and because Evolution to them equals no creation they will
to them equals no creation they will fight with everything to try to prove
fight with everything to try to prove the nonsense because they don't want to
the nonsense because they don't want to believe in God and many of them believe
believe in God and many of them believe science is against religion many of them
science is against religion many of them are from Christian backgrounds they've
are from Christian backgrounds they've been have bad experiences in their
been have bad experiences in their religion generally they don't want
religion generally they don't want religion they want to move away from
religion they want to move away from religion they already have this
religion they already have this assumption so they would accept aliens
assumption so they would accept aliens Someone Like Richard Doggers will accept
Someone Like Richard Doggers will accept aliens over accepting that there is a
aliens over accepting that there is a Creator an intelligent maker of the
Creator an intelligent maker of the universe they will not accept that they
universe they will not accept that they will accept things like intelligent
will accept things like intelligent matter this article that I put by
matter this article that I put by science they try to attribute
science they try to attribute intelligence
intelligence choice to matter
choice to matter they would attribute intelligence and
they would attribute intelligence and choice to matter but they would not
choice to matter but they would not attribute it to the creator of matter
attribute it to the creator of matter why because they're coming from the
why because they're coming from the presupposition of naturalism that's why
presupposition of naturalism that's why you can never disprove these people
you can never disprove these people because they will always say to you the
because they will always say to you the only explanation we accept is the
only explanation we accept is the natural explanation they will come from
natural explanation they will come from the hidden assumption they will go to
the hidden assumption they will go to the extent of accepting aliens accepting
the extent of accepting aliens accepting matter to be intelligence cells microbes
matter to be intelligence cells microbes viruses all of these things are
viruses all of these things are intelligence and that's how we have
intelligence and that's how we have mutations that's how we have the first
mutations that's how we have the first cell that's how we have things happening
cell that's how we have things happening in the universe they will use anything
in the universe they will use anything anything except a creator that created
anything except a creator that created all of that that guided all of that
all of that that guided all of that right and now the last thing I want to
right and now the last thing I want to show is this is this documentary The
show is this is this documentary The Expelled right
Expelled right I genuinely warn people anyone who's
I genuinely warn people anyone who's doubting that there is a specific agenda
doubting that there is a specific agenda happening because of evolution in the
happening because of evolution in the scientific community that they're
scientific community that they're pushing away anyone who goes against
pushing away anyone who goes against them anyone who's got this idea that
them anyone who's got this idea that anyone who who tries to use God or
anyone who who tries to use God or creationism and evolution or deny any of
creationism and evolution or deny any of these things anyone who've got any doubt
these things anyone who've got any doubt that this is not happening watch this
that this is not happening watch this this documentary it's available on
this documentary it's available on YouTube actually let me open it I'll
YouTube actually let me open it I'll just watch this is the beginning of it
just watch this is the beginning of it maybe hopefully we didn't get
maybe hopefully we didn't get copyrighted or anything like I don't
copyrighted or anything like I don't think we will right but let's just watch
think we will right but let's just watch this uh just the beginning of this if we
this uh just the beginning of this if we call if we're commenting on it we won't
call if we're commenting on it we won't guess right yeah yeah we are committing
guess right yeah yeah we are committing isn't it yeah yeah we are genuinely
isn't it yeah yeah we are genuinely commenting actually so well
commenting actually so well alhamdulillah I know some of the people
alhamdulillah I know some of the people who are in the documentary
okay let's play it's just a part of it not much okay so here's a documentary
not much okay so here's a documentary it's called expelled no intelligence
it's called expelled no intelligence allowed okay
allowed okay just watch it don't don't accept my word
just watch it don't don't accept my word for it just watch watch what they say
for it just watch watch what they say [Music]
[Music] [Applause]
[Applause] move on from the music
move on from the music in a much larger War
in a much larger War science simply makes no use of the
science simply makes no use of the hypothesis of God
hypothesis of God ask yourself what is intelligent design
ask yourself what is intelligent design giveness nothing
we cannot accept intelligent design as an alternative scientific theory
an alternative scientific theory they will never accept that we have a
they will never accept that we have a better argument it just pester us and
better argument it just pester us and they waste our time
[Music] now I'm going to leave you a neck lift
now I'm going to leave you a neck lift hanger you know yeah I'm Gonna Leave You
hanger you know yeah I'm Gonna Leave You guys a likely figure seriously watch
guys a likely figure seriously watch that if you really want to see if those
that if you really want to see if those people are genuine in the research and
people are genuine in the research and what they already heard some of the
what they already heard some of the statements yeah watch that look how
statements yeah watch that look how those people no matter what they're not
those people no matter what they're not going to accept any alternative
going to accept any alternative explanations right and I rest my case
explanations right and I rest my case absolutely mashallah that was a very
absolutely mashallah that was a very beautiful presentation
beautiful presentation um and the reason I didn't want to
um and the reason I didn't want to interrupt you is because I've done
interrupt you is because I've done presentations before and someone
presentations before and someone interrupts your flow you forget where
interrupts your flow you forget where you are and you know it stops things
you are and you know it stops things absolutely absolutely
absolutely absolutely I mean one of the things Muhammad which
I mean one of the things Muhammad which is very interesting about the way that
is very interesting about the way that you presented is that
you presented is that there is a lack of trust
there is a lack of trust now
now from the general public if they were to
from the general public if they were to take what the the information that we
take what the the information that we have here and process it properly
have here and process it properly there's a lack of trust with what some
there's a lack of trust with what some of these dominants are saying because
of these dominants are saying because essentially there is so much shoehorning
essentially there is so much shoehorning there's so much reverse engineering
there's so much reverse engineering there's so much ad hoc rationalization
there's so much ad hoc rationalization the fact is sometimes we just got to get
the fact is sometimes we just got to get to the the root of the issue the rule of
to the the root of the issue the rule of the issue is they've already assumed
the issue is they've already assumed Darwinism to be true from their own set
Darwinism to be true from their own set they've just assumed it to be true
they've just assumed it to be true that's why when it comes to similarities
that's why when it comes to similarities between the two genomes rather than
between the two genomes rather than being honest and saying one genome is
being honest and saying one genome is bigger than the other we can't really do
bigger than the other we can't really do a right uh comparison they just make all
a right uh comparison they just make all these assumptions and deletions and
these assumptions and deletions and substitutions and say hey look at the
substitutions and say hey look at the similarity without telling us what that
similarity without telling us what that similarity means because similarity you
similarity means because similarity you know itself doesn't mean anything and
know itself doesn't mean anything and likewise Randomness the evidence you
likewise Randomness the evidence you know you gave the good example of uh
know you gave the good example of uh Dennis Noble but we have uh James
Dennis Noble but we have uh James Shapiro with natural genetic engineering
Shapiro with natural genetic engineering who's speaking about how most of the
who's speaking about how most of the mutations are not actually random
mutations are not actually random they're actually directed by the
they're actually directed by the organism itself
organism itself um so then you have people like Lynn
um so then you have people like Lynn margulis yeah people like Master Tashi
margulis yeah people like Master Tashi and I so many atheist scientists who are
and I so many atheist scientists who are coming out and saying this is garbage it
coming out and saying this is garbage it doesn't make sense then you have atheist
doesn't make sense then you have atheist academics like Jerry folder who
academics like Jerry folder who um you know in his book or Darwin got
um you know in his book or Darwin got wrong he spoke about the the pressure in
wrong he spoke about the the pressure in Academia to conform the pressure not to
Academia to conform the pressure not to challenge Darwinism and he's an atheist
challenge Darwinism and he's an atheist and likewise you have Thomas Nagel
and likewise you have Thomas Nagel another atheist philosopher who speaks
another atheist philosopher who speaks about how Darwinism uh has created
about how Darwinism uh has created Darwinism within Academia has created a
Darwinism within Academia has created a situation where you can't really
situation where you can't really question it and I think the real issue
question it and I think the real issue here is whether you look at the data or
here is whether you look at the data or you look at the scientists themselves
you look at the scientists themselves this is not a normal Theory this is not
this is not a normal Theory this is not the way that science normally operates
the way that science normally operates there's something very dark about this
there's something very dark about this Theory and there's and and that
Theory and there's and and that particular aspect of it you only really
particular aspect of it you only really start to understand when you understand
start to understand when you understand that Darwinism feeds into atheism and
that Darwinism feeds into atheism and Atheism feeds into Darwinism they have
Atheism feeds into Darwinism they have this relationship and that is absolutely
this relationship and that is absolutely key one last thing I just wanted to add
key one last thing I just wanted to add is please go back and watch the stream
is please go back and watch the stream and when Muhammad's giving his
and when Muhammad's giving his presentation on the various different
presentation on the various different issues pay attention and take notes for
issues pay attention and take notes for example one of the things he mentioned
example one of the things he mentioned right at the beginning was about
right at the beginning was about gradualism right and why gradualism so
gradualism right and why gradualism so important according to Darwinism if
important according to Darwinism if things didn't work in numerous slight
things didn't work in numerous slight successive modifications how loss that's
successive modifications how loss that's the end of Darwinism you have to have
the end of Darwinism you have to have gradualism as he showed you actually
gradualism as he showed you actually don't have gradualism you have
don't have gradualism you have punctuated equilibrium you have
punctuated equilibrium you have Cambridge
Cambridge Explorer by the way I had a list of all
Explorer by the way I had a list of all of the evolution Evolution
of the evolution Evolution I forgot there's a whole list I am made
I forgot there's a whole list I am made of all of the lances new new names evil
of all of the lances new new names evil evil Evolution all of these new
evil Evolution all of these new announces that they've brought just
announces that they've brought just trying to explain sorry right yeah
trying to explain sorry right yeah absolutely because they're trying to
absolutely because they're trying to they're basically trying to fill up the
they're basically trying to fill up the whole and you know gradualism is to
whole and you know gradualism is to Darwinism what tohid is to Islam if you
Darwinism what tohid is to Islam if you take out though he there's no Islam if
take out though he there's no Islam if you take out gradualism which in the
you take out gradualism which in the fossil record doesn't exist
fossil record doesn't exist as Stephen J Gould pointed out his
as Stephen J Gould pointed out his gradualism is not what you see then that
gradualism is not what you see then that is sufficient to debunk Darwinism
is sufficient to debunk Darwinism everything else is not important after
everything else is not important after you've already debunked using that but
you've already debunked using that but each one of those things whether it
each one of those things whether it comes to the problems in terms of how
comes to the problems in terms of how they work with genetics or whether it's
they work with genetics or whether it's a social biology sociobiology and the
a social biology sociobiology and the problem with evolutionary psychology
problem with evolutionary psychology it's wrong every single time so
it's wrong every single time so Muhammad you know the presentation was
Muhammad you know the presentation was fantastic what I want everybody to do is
fantastic what I want everybody to do is to learn from this presentation spread
to learn from this presentation spread this knowledge because fundamentally we
this knowledge because fundamentally we want people to believe in Allah and the
want people to believe in Allah and the strongest evidence the strongest
strongest evidence the strongest evidence for the existence of Allah is
evidence for the existence of Allah is found within nature now we as human
found within nature now we as human beings we have a fitra that's why we
beings we have a fitra that's why we believe in Allah that's why an atheist
believe in Allah that's why an atheist calls out upon Allah even if they're on
calls out upon Allah even if they're on a ship and they've never been told about
a ship and they've never been told about Dua however what awakens the fitra is
Dua however what awakens the fitra is actually things like the design argument
actually things like the design argument we should be happily using the design
we should be happily using the design argument we shouldn't be shy about it we
argument we shouldn't be shy about it we should be confident in using it because
should be confident in using it because actually it's like something important
actually it's like something important in the design argument is this is the
in the design argument is this is the most used argument in the Quran
most used argument in the Quran yeah because it appears this is
yeah because it appears this is something that some people neglect it's
something that some people neglect it's not just the idea of your of your
not just the idea of your of your ranking of what is a better argument but
ranking of what is a better argument but the idea is that for what the Quran used
the idea is that for what the Quran used the most because this is what appeals
the most because this is what appeals the most to the natural human nature of
the most to the natural human nature of the human being right and what happens
the human being right and what happens why are you why are we not using it
why are you why are we not using it because of evolution
because of evolution right so the point is we need to stop
right so the point is we need to stop doing that all we need to do is to
doing that all we need to do is to challenge those who with if we use
challenge those who with if we use argument and they bring forth Evolution
argument and they bring forth Evolution we need to challenge this idea to show
we need to challenge this idea to show them that they're brainwashed to believe
them that they're brainwashed to believe in what they believe in and they
in what they believe in and they actually know that's right things are
actually know that's right things are designed things are not just designed
designed things are not just designed they're perfected
they're perfected they are perfected by the Creator right
they are perfected by the Creator right I'm sorry no no absolutely absolutely
I'm sorry no no absolutely absolutely that's exactly the way I would say and
that's exactly the way I would say and confidence is extremely important here
confidence is extremely important here and where does confidence come from
and where does confidence come from confident doesn't come from just
confident doesn't come from just prepping yourself up getting yourself
prepping yourself up getting yourself into a state or going to the gym
into a state or going to the gym confidence comes from knowledge
confidence comes from knowledge confidence comes from practice
confidence comes from practice confidence comes from opposing the other
confidence comes from opposing the other side looking at their arguments and
side looking at their arguments and refuting those arguments and confidence
refuting those arguments and confidence is something contagious because once
is something contagious because once people see wait a minute this guy's
people see wait a minute this guy's using design argument he's not getting
using design argument he's not getting refuted he's refuting the other side
refuted he's refuting the other side they start using it and ultimately what
they start using it and ultimately what we need to realize is that shaytan is
we need to realize is that shaytan is using certain things to try and take
using certain things to try and take people away from Allah and one of the
people away from Allah and one of the things I believe I truly believe
things I believe I truly believe shaytan's been using over the last 150
shaytan's been using over the last 150 years is Darwinism and the link between
years is Darwinism and the link between Darwinism
well you know what's interesting is that when we look at the way that this Theory
when we look at the way that this Theory scares the crap out of people right
scares the crap out of people right certain people they're like no no I
certain people they're like no no I don't want to talk about this yeah but
don't want to talk about this yeah but it's it's it's really I mean the the
it's it's it's really I mean the the analogy you can think of is like this
analogy you can think of is like this right there's an extremely scary looking
right there's an extremely scary looking dog right it looks like a Mongolian lion
dog right it looks like a Mongolian lion right it's it's it's got these you know
right it's it's it's got these you know huge face hair all over the place you
huge face hair all over the place you know 300 pounds however every day you
know 300 pounds however every day you come out your house this dog starts
come out your house this dog starts barking you run back inside that's what
barking you run back inside that's what darwinism's like for some people
darwinism's like for some people absolutely and some people however one
absolutely and some people however one day if you just walk out your house and
day if you just walk out your house and you let the dog attack you you realize
you let the dog attack you you realize it doesn't have any teeth
it doesn't have any teeth right it's toothless right that that's
right it's toothless right that that's exactly dominant it doesn't have any
exactly dominant it doesn't have any teeth it doesn't have the power that it
teeth it doesn't have the power that it actually realizes not a dog at all
actually realizes not a dog at all you've been hearing your noise
yeah exactly exactly that's it it's a Chihuahua yeah so brother Muhammad you
Chihuahua yeah so brother Muhammad you you came to the studio late to come this
you came to the studio late to come this to to do the stream I don't want to hold
to to do the stream I don't want to hold you back
any last message you want to give to the people before we end
people before we end well I want to give to the people is is
well I want to give to the people is is let's let's have what we call Beneficial
let's let's have what we call Beneficial knowledge right so let's actually not be
knowledge right so let's actually not be sitting down for one hour 14 minutes
sitting down for one hour 14 minutes listening for the sake of listening
listening for the sake of listening let's actually try to do some uh
let's actually try to do some uh research opening the links that I
research opening the links that I already put forward for these things
already put forward for these things looking into these issues more detail
looking into these issues more detail and understanding right I've I've
and understanding right I've I've summarized for you the the problems I've
summarized for you the the problems I've summarized for you the evidences of how
summarized for you the evidences of how to refute I've given you the links right
to refute I've given you the links right you you literally don't have to do
you you literally don't have to do anything you just have to understand the
anything you just have to understand the points I was making
points I was making why these problems are problems and why
why these problems are problems and why are these the pillars of the theory to
are these the pillars of the theory to begin with so there's no Theory without
begin with so there's no Theory without them right once you understand that
them right once you understand that you've done it right uh and I think
you've done it right uh and I think brother saboris tired some people asking
brother saboris tired some people asking any questions no My Brothers Tires he's
any questions no My Brothers Tires he's not gonna take any questions
not gonna take any questions um yeah I mean I I would do the stream
um yeah I mean I I would do the stream longer but I've got work tomorrow
longer but I've got work tomorrow morning
morning absolutely absolutely but for Muhammad I
absolutely absolutely but for Muhammad I love your stuff keep up the good work
love your stuff keep up the good work Michelle I'm very happy I need to come
Michelle I'm very happy I need to come down to Leicester Square and join you I
down to Leicester Square and join you I need to watch season action inshallah
need to watch season action inshallah you know one of one of the things I
you know one of one of the things I think which is important for young
think which is important for young people uh to realize is
people uh to realize is when you equip yourself with information
when you equip yourself with information you will have more confidence sometimes
you will have more confidence sometimes people ask why are these people
people ask why are these people confident why is Muhammad Ali confident
confident why is Muhammad Ali confident why is it it's the confidence doesn't
why is it it's the confidence doesn't come genetically the confidence comes
come genetically the confidence comes from from education
from from education you spent a few hours putting together
you spent a few hours putting together this presentation but it wasn't a few
this presentation but it wasn't a few hours of Muhammad it was actually a lot
hours of Muhammad it was actually a lot of work you did previously and you were
of work you did previously and you were just summarizing it do you understand
just summarizing it do you understand absolutely absolutely absolutely and how
absolutely absolutely absolutely and how much I mean for the people how much work
much I mean for the people how much work do you put in like you know when it
do you put in like you know when it comes to these types of uh things do you
comes to these types of uh things do you do you basically set aside a certain
do you basically set aside a certain time of the day where you do research
time of the day where you do research how do you work it out me personally
how do you work it out me personally yeah
yeah well I uh I've got a specific time of
well I uh I've got a specific time of the day right or then let's not just say
the day right or then let's not just say one because it depends on on what I'm
one because it depends on on what I'm doing like for example there's a
doing like for example there's a specific time for Quran for example
specific time for Quran for example right and and there's a specific time
right and and there's a specific time for for uh reading a specific book and
for for uh reading a specific book and then there is a specific time for
then there is a specific time for General recession on all of these
General recession on all of these different topics right atheism Etc
different topics right atheism Etc science and cosmology all of these
science and cosmology all of these issues right point is
issues right point is if you have a system you stick to the
if you have a system you stick to the system like for example if I have after
system like for example if I have after Fajr I'm gonna do my my Quran revision
Fajr I'm gonna do my my Quran revision right which includes the say for example
right which includes the say for example if I'm doing it for for 30 40 minutes
if I'm doing it for for 30 40 minutes then every day I'm doing it for 30-40
then every day I'm doing it for 30-40 minutes
minutes right I'm not asking you to have the
right I'm not asking you to have the biggest you can be working and do the
biggest you can be working and do the system that I'm doing by the way right
system that I'm doing by the way right because I'm doing I'm doing so many
because I'm doing I'm doing so many things right point is it's not that you
things right point is it's not that you don't have time it is that you're
don't have time it is that you're wasting your time on the wrong things
wasting your time on the wrong things spending yeah and I just say to the
spending yeah and I just say to the people just open your phone click screen
people just open your phone click screen time
time screen time is an answer to how much
screen time is an answer to how much rubbish you're reading on a daily basis
rubbish you're reading on a daily basis or probably listening to things which
or probably listening to things which are not important right especially if
are not important right especially if it's in this Tick Tock this nonsense
it's in this Tick Tock this nonsense right so point is this just make a
right so point is this just make a system for yourself
system for yourself one and a half hour one and a half hour
one and a half hour one and a half hour a day
a day simple right I if all of us can have one
simple right I if all of us can have one and a half hour a day I doubt that no
and a half hour a day I doubt that no one doesn't have one app are they give
one doesn't have one app are they give you after prayers so you remember you
you after prayers so you remember you don't lose the time keep it after praise
don't lose the time keep it after praise okay let's say half an hour after half
okay let's say half an hour after half an hour after after us and half an hour
an hour after after us and half an hour hour after but stick to them stick to
hour after but stick to them stick to them don't say I've got this thing to do
them don't say I've got this thing to do therefore I'm gonna ignore my 30 minutes
therefore I'm gonna ignore my 30 minutes of today and I'm gonna do this thing
of today and I'm gonna do this thing this is where we got our issues right is
this is where we got our issues right is the commitment 30 minutes will go so
the commitment 30 minutes will go so much we will go so much you will look
much we will go so much you will look you will finish books upon books and the
you will finish books upon books and the more you read the more quicker you read
more you read the more quicker you read you'll finish books upon books you'll
you'll finish books upon books you'll finish complete a complete amount of
finish complete a complete amount of research if you memorize the Quran
research if you memorize the Quran you'll be memorizing the whole Quran if
you'll be memorizing the whole Quran if you stick to that this is my My Method
you stick to that this is my My Method this is what my teachers have taught me
this is what my teachers have taught me just have a specific time of the day
just have a specific time of the day it's all about commitment
it's all about commitment if you commit to it you will get the
if you commit to it you will get the benefit the problem what some people do
benefit the problem what some people do is that they want this is what this age
is that they want this is what this age of Technology have taught us
of Technology have taught us you want maximum amount of knowledge in
you want maximum amount of knowledge in the shortest amount of time this is what
the shortest amount of time this is what people started to have in their mind I
people started to have in their mind I want in two hours now I've understand
want in two hours now I've understand everything I wanted to I want to read
everything I wanted to I want to read this book and now I'm able to do that
this book and now I'm able to do that one right some people ask me which book
one right some people ask me which book do you recommend so I can do that
do you recommend so I can do that brother is that you open the door you
brother is that you open the door you close the door it's not it's not like
close the door it's not it's not like this right and and that's what our
this right and and that's what our teachers thought is it takes time do not
teachers thought is it takes time do not look at them look Mount is a mountain
look at them look Mount is a mountain but if you start taking one Rock by one
but if you start taking one Rock by one rock the mountain is gone before you
rock the mountain is gone before you know it don't look at the mountain try
know it don't look at the mountain try to move the full Mountain this is what
to move the full Mountain this is what people do they want to get the max so
people do they want to get the max so many so much knowledge in short amounts
many so much knowledge in short amounts of time and when they don't they give up
of time and when they don't they give up if you're consistent and you spend a
if you're consistent and you spend a small amount of time like Allah said the
small amount of time like Allah said the most beloved these Allah are small are
most beloved these Allah are small are small but they're consistent
small but they're consistent even if they're small even if they're
even if they're small even if they're small but they're consistent a
small but they're consistent a consistency is key if you're doing the
consistency is key if you're doing the consistency you will get the knowledge
consistency you will get the knowledge right you don't it doesn't matter how
right you don't it doesn't matter how busy you are you've got one and a half
busy you are you've got one and a half hour in your day to do I'm telling you
hour in your day to do I'm telling you absolutely that's that that's the best
absolutely that's that that's the best advice Allah loves those things which
advice Allah loves those things which are consistent even if they're small so
are consistent even if they're small so the Muslim Lantern Muhammad Ali for
the Muslim Lantern Muhammad Ali for joining me on this lifetime I sure
joining me on this lifetime I sure notice I would say and until next time I
notice I would say and until next time I would love to have you back again
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
