YouTube Transcript:
Lifespan Social and Personality Development In Infancy Lecture
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
View:
hello students so our goal let me double
check okay
our goal
in this lecture is going to be to cover
some important aspects of
social and personality development in infancy
infancy
so on your screen i will have some terms
and some notations about those terms
that i have prepared for you
that will assist you
in understanding the material and
preparing for the test
so there are a number of different uh
things we're going to cover we're
picking certain things to focus on but
there are a number of ideas that we're
going to cover here
and some important points that we'll
make along the way
uh one thing to note is uh
just to clarify because we started using
this term in this class for this section
the term infant
usually refers to a child from birth to
one year
you can sometimes hear the child or the
term infant used as an insult as a
metaphor but when we use infant in the
academic sense
in the scientific sense
we're referring to a child
who uh am referring to age from birth to
one year that is what we mean when we
say infant now there are a few things i
will say
in this lecture that will extend beyond
that year just because
uh some
components to development
development
that we sort of start discussing here
and in in this section extend beyond
that period of time of course so we will
mention some later ages but the word
infant means uh birth to one year
let's talk about some things uh that we
see in terms of what social and
personality development in infancy that
we see emerging at this time now it's
worth noting now that
that
we've been talking about
physical development and cognitive
development and now
social and personality development so
worthwhile point to make about that is
that these things are interconnected so
we're sort of talking about them
separately so that we can cover
so that we can cover and explain
specific things however
however
uh those
all these things are interconnected much
of life is interconnected isn't it so
so
on that interconnectedness we can
observe that when we talk about physical development
development we
we
know that the brain
develops rapidly
at this time
and this
brain development as the brain continues
to grow
to become
a sign functions
functions uh
uh
the brain gets more and more complicated
in its functioning and so
we see cognitive development become
continually more complex
so a child develops cognitively very
quickly uh especially in these these early
early
stages and ages now then we're talking
about social development right social
personality development so along with
those increases in the the complexity of
the brain and the increase in the
complexity of thoughts and cognitions we
see an increase in complexity of social
so we talk about them separately we also
recognize they're interconnected
stranger anxiety
we often see appear around eight to nine months
months
and that is caution and wariness when
encountering an unfamiliar person now this
this
reflects the increasing complexity of
the child right the child's ability to
recognize people who are familiar and
recognize that someone is unfamiliar i
don't know this person
and so then we can have the the
subsequent caution and wariness
separation anxiety once again often
appears at around eight to nine months
these are different things these are
different things your text
makes some effort to differentiate
between these two terms they are
different they are also uh
related right different different but
related so separation anxiety often
appears around the same time distress
displayed by infants when a customary
caregiver is absent so this is all you
can say this makes evolutionary sense as
we will with
a lot of terms and ideas that
we'll discuss in this class
makes evolutionary sense that the child
as the child develops and gets more
sophisticated that the child would start to
to
have a sensibility about who is good for
me to be around and who is not good for
me to be around and what could possibly
happen to me when my caregiver isn't
around that's that could be bad when my
caregiver isn't around now
our infant isn't
articulating these ideas of these words
as i am but we're talking about developing
developing
ever more complex sensibilities a sense
of safety a sense of danger and how to
perceive that
perceive those things
so they make sense they're different and
social referencing
often also apparent around eight to ten months
months so
so
this is referred to as intentional i
would say that there's a lot of
if we need another term i guess we would
need another term but i would say that a
lot of social referencing is
unintentional in children and adults
we don't realize we're doing it but
we're doing it
that's another i guess that's another [Music]
[Music]
conversation uh for our purposes here
we're referring to the intentional
search for how other people feel about
an object person or situation to help
the child understand circumstances and
events so how should i perceive this and
how should i feel again the child
doesn't have to be articulating these
questions in the way that we would as
adults they're developing these sort of sensibilities
sensibilities so
so
in a new situation
if the adults appear fearful the child
may become fearful because the child is deferring
deferring
to and referencing
the responses of the adults this is the
way a child learns to understand the
environment what to avoid
again this makes perfect evolutionary
sense what to avoid
what to move toward and embrace
uh and accept uh
uh
what should produce trepidation what
should produce a sense of safety
so social referencing another one makes
perfect sense it emerges around the same
time generally as these two now these
are sort of average right eight to nine
months for stranger anxiety eight to
nine months or so for separation anxiety
eight to ten months for social
referencing so these are rough
rough
roughly averages so some
children may show these behaviors
earlier some
again all of these and i think social
referencing in an interesting way
is very important for survival it's
important from an evolutionary
perspective and important for the
survival of the species the child is is
is
i'm going to use this term program the
child is programmed to adapt to the environment
environment
in many ways one of those by
adaptation adaptation and so that's
that's really social learning so
later in the class we'll mention things
a couple things like social learning
theory we do talk about that a little
bit in intro
social learning theory this is an early
uh manifestation of social learning
right there
learning from others learning from the experiences
experiences
and reactions of others so theory of
mind i make some notes on this and you
see let me go down here a little bit so
we'll talk about this
we could say it exists in degrees and it
develops over time so you do you do see
some reference to
to
ages beyond one year here right
we do see 13
10 to 13 months most of that falls
within one year
by the way i'm pointing at my screen and
there's no way you can see me pointing
at my screens but that's just something
i'm doing automatically
uh here you can see this 10 to 13 watts
there we go i see that so
let's talk a little bit about the
definition here knowledge and beliefs
about how the mind works and how it
affects behavior so you get the sense
that other people have a mind
you know if if children young young
children could articulate this they might
might
articulate descartes
maxim i think therefore i am all right
they might do that but then you start
figuring out there's these other people around
around
pretty sure they're thinking too
again if you could articulate that at
that age you start developing this sensibility
sensibility so
so
the development of this awareness is
complex many sources will say that a
theory of mind emerges between
ages four and five but so this we can
see this as sort of emerging in stages
so to speak over time
but children at 10 to 13 months seem to
have some understanding of social dominance
dominance
a big theme
that we're arguing about
we always argue about as human beings
social dominance and who should be if anyone
anyone
so that's ongoing it takes different
social cultural
and political forms
over the centuries uh in decades but
uh it's
that's a thing you get a rudimentary
understanding there's this thing that as
adults we call social dominance
as early as 18 months now again we're
talking a little older than than uh than
an infant a year and a half
or so uh children can show the ability
to understand that behaviors have
meaning and are goal directed
behaviors have meaning and are goal directed
so we see how this can develop over time
10 to 13 months 18 months
four and five years
increasing complexity once again so
here's what i write uh other
other
psychologists agree with me on this but
this is an observation i've made with children
children
is that a good indicator of increased
complexity is when a child starts using deception
deception
often in the second year of life
this includes being able to estimate
what other people are thinking so when a child
child
at two or three says
if i tell mom this she won't be mad at
me that child has a theory of mine
and is using that understanding that
that child has developed in order to lie
to you so you know
he or she doesn't get in trouble so
you're also they're also thinking about
what outcome do i want
i don't want to get in trouble
i want to get away with this what am i
going to do i'm going to lie about it
so that's a good indicator of increased
complexity when a child starts using
deception often in the second year of
life so this includes being able to
estimate what other people are thinking
just to some degree to some degree so
that's theory of mine
might start sort of start around here so
near the end of infant hood
and then grow in complexity
18 months two years
so here's an
extremely important social behavior
empathy and empathy is different than sympathy
sympathy
yes i did make a note here about that so
sympathy as we know is you sort of feel
badly for someone i feel badly for this
person i might try to help him or her
out sympathy has a place
uh but a certain we might argue we may i
might argue that a higher level
of emotional response is this and this
is uh here's our two i think
you know how do you define empathy well
you can go on and on about it trying to
define it
but here i think is a pretty succinct
way to describe it at least to a degree
and that is an emotional response that
corresponds to the feelings of another person
person
so you might feel another see another
person being sad you might understand
why that person is sad and you may
indeed feel some sadness yourself on
that person's behalf
another way one of the ways we talk
about it in
early counseling classes in graduate
school is stepping outside of your
experience into someone else's
experience and being able to step back
into your own
see you empathize but you don't um
you are still able to step back into
your own experience it doesn't become pathological
pathological
uh so the beginnings of empathy can be
seen sometimes as early as age two
sympathy is different than empathy i say
and this is another succinct thing that
i didn't come up with this wording and
this is not in your text uh
this is in your text
this is not but and it's not mine either
so i can't take credit for it but this
is a wonderful wording of this
sympathy does not involve leaving your
own perspective
so empathy involves leaving your own perspective
perspective
sympathy does not so that's a very
succinct way to put that
i found that somewhere i don't know
who's responsible for that wording but
that was
this is very good and this is pretty
good too from your text as far as
empathy goes an emotional response that
corresponds to the feeling
so let's talk a bit about attachment uh
we'll get into these cultural norms
uh and this is
and well we're moving in a certain
direction all right so attachment
attachment
here's the definition
uh the positive emotional bond that
develops between a child and a
particular individual that would be a caregiver
caregiver
attachment should be seen as a general
human tendency so we
uh makes evolutionary sense and it's
adaptive to have some attachment to your
caregiver and have some ability
for an understanding of the phenomenon
certain cultures we can see the
so the ainsworth strange situation test
dramatization
and demonstration
of how attachment tends to work in
the united states and probably in some
other european cultures some other
western cultures
because we raise our children into
certain ways right or in a certain way
we treat tend to treat children in
certain ways in our cultures
cultures
like the us and great britain
and scotland and some other western
cultures where we would have some things
and some things in common there's enough
commonality that we can say
that we can look at the ainsworth
strange situation test and apply it well
children attach
in the way that to their caregivers and
the way that attachment
manifests itself
in what happens when you test that attachment
attachment
that can vary depending on the culture
some cultures don't value independence
as much as we do and the mother will
actually carry the child around with her
a lot more
for a longer period of time where the child's
child's
in physical contact with the mother
more often and for a longer period of
time than we would generally see
and so obviously that child growing up
that way
being accustomed to being treated that
way is going to
than a child who was raised
from very early on with the idea of
independence in mind they're going to
respond differently when separated from
their caregiver they're going to have
different whether again whether or not
they can articulate them consciously
in words
they're going to have different expectations
expectations
they've learned to have different
expectations they've been taught
to have different expectations so
so
we can and do see differences
in attachment
among cultures but the angelsworth
strange situation test is a great test
test
to show us how attachment can work
what a certain approach to understanding
uh attachment can teach us
so we have separate resources on that
and you can watch the ainsworth strange
situation test resources very valuable
so as i said cultural norms and
expectations have an impact
on attachment so we can't necessarily
understand we don't we don't understand
children in every culture in the way
they attach via
western
concepts via the use of something like
the ainsworth strange situation test
as we know it so we can't understand
it's not universal can't understand
every culture universally
using these conceptions and using the
answer strange situation test it's valuable
and we've learned from it but
but
we also should not fail to understand
understand
the different effects of of different
cultural norms and expectations they're
going to have on parents and are going
and the and the subsequent behavioral
patterns so i have a quote from the text
i liked i put in here uh secure
attachment as defined by western oriented
oriented
uh the western oriented strange
situation test may be seen earliest in
cultures that promote independence but
may be delayed in societies in which
independence is a less important
cultural value so that's
let's talk about the harlow monkey study
so this is a famous study it has been replicated
replicated
so in this study monkeys
were given two caregivers by the
researchers neither of which was an
actual monkey
these monkeys were cared for by
fake monkeys
which might be a little like a fake ship
we'd have to ask
experts on that term for that but fake monkeys
so what we found was what researchers
found was
they watched where the monkey tended to gravitate
gravitate
and how the monkey responded to each caregiver
caregiver
so monkey's referrer preferred the warm
soft mother to the wire monkey that
so this is pretty significant
one might have thought that the monkey
would spend time and prefer the company
quote-unquote company of the wire monkey
it's just wires but food comes out of it and
and
the monkey knows it gets food from this source
source
nourishment it needs to live
we might have concluded that the monkey
would sort of instinctively or
intuitively tend to prefer
that quote-unquote mother
and spend time there but that's not what
happened now the other mother was not
wire the other mother had
actually terry cloth
in the original
in the original study that was soft and
so monkeys
spent more time clinging
to the soft terry cloth mother
again quote-unquote mother
the one that provided food
and when frightened
monkeys were more readily soothed by the
presence of the cloth mother than the
wired mother so when
frightened the monkeys would run to the
cloth mother and cling
so one of the things that that highlights
highlights
is the importance of touch
i don't know that your text
sort of talks about it this way exactly
but i wanted to add this term
because it's an important term contact
comfort now the apa
gives it the american psychological association
association
gives an interesting definition of
of uh
uh
contact comfort
based probably in part on the harlow study
the positive effects you can see the
definition here the positive effects
experienced by infants or young animals
when in close contact with soft materials
generally what we would want the soft
material we would want to be the one of
the parents at least the mother maybe
the father
but flashy soft flesh is relatively soft
compared to
wire or
steel or
granite right so we're a lot softer than that
that
i would venture to say
although this is not measured
by the harlow study not measured by the
harlow study i would also venture to say
warmth feeling the warmth of flesh and
feeling that
that skin on your skin when you're a child
child
even if
it's through clothes the clothes are
soft and you can still feel that this is
a warm living person the monkeys didn't
get that in the heart of the study but
but we humans uh
ideally ideally get that
i would say that's some a comforting
factor as well
although again that factor wasn't
measured by the original harlow studies
uh so this positive effect experienced
by infants and young animals went in
uh so actually i did i put that in the
notes what i just said
it might be worth mentioning some
materials likely mimic the warm soft
experience of being in contact with the
flesh of a live
so i did write that in there i was
thinking it just now but i i did write it
so contact comfort and contact with
physical contact with a caregiver is
very important for development
and i we do have some resources
on that
about how this physical contact affects
interact with physical contact interacting
interacting
visually with the caregiver
has a significant impact
on brain development and of course as a result
result
subsequent behavior
so this contact with the caregiver
in the case of people hopefully a love
it hopefully
a loving human caregiver
hopefully uh in in that case this
contact and these interactions are huge
absolutely huge when it comes to a child developing
developing
hugely important i think we do get that
across in our resources
on this particular subject
i include the term contact comfort here
because it is a term that exists
so now we can start talking about uh the
mutual regulation model so
these are ideas that clinicians have
come up with to explain
aspects of the relationship between
the caregiver and the child all right so
there is a lot of communication that
goes on among human beings including uh infants
infants
some of which is verbal the actual words
you're speaking
some of which
uh has less to do with the words you're
speaking than the tone
in which you are speaking
and then there are nonverbal
nonverbal
communications which is much of communication
that would include body language facial
expressions and things of this nature so
these things all combined
to constitute our human
communication and you know with regard to
vocal tone for instance uh
not too long ago uh i was visiting uh
fred devine and
his little boy was i think
he and his wife had a little boy i think
he was about
four at the time
something like that
and the avengers was on so
he was enjoying watching the avengers
and we were kind of talking and watching
it with him and
and
there's a scene in the movie the
avengers where
in which
loki is sort of using
i think maybe it was his staff some kind
of magic to make everybody kind of angry
and they all sort of started yelling at
one another and arguing with one another things
things
you can even see the camera angle gets a
little bit tilted and so there's
something wrong and they're they're
really behaving
uh aggressively toward one another
and all the other sort of bad things
they might be able to think of to say to
one another they start saying and
and this
this
his son
became upset
he didn't the action didn't bother him
it was
the tone of voice i don't think he
understood a lot of what was being said
i think it was the tone of voice
my friend said what we turned it off my
friend said my son started getting upset
and i said i think it had to do
with the tone of voice
he may have been three i i can't
remember how old the child was at that
time either three or four it was is in
that age range
uh but i think that's what happened and
so that was that
and maybe he was looking at their facial
expressions which changed and the camera
was sort of filming them to make them
look a certain way so
i think that's what happened so children
pick up on these things uh at that age
and even as infants okay even as infants
children could pick up on these things so
so this
this
mutual regulation model so the
definition is the model in which parents
and infants learn to communicate
emotional states to one another and respond
respond
appropriately your text says
appropriately i added the word hopefully appropriately
appropriately
that parents
respond to their children appropriately
that's not always the case is it but
if the child is in distress hopefully
the parent
will respond appropriately and that can
with that appropriate response from the
parent and that help from the parent the
caregiver then the child may very well
calm down and his or her emotional state
will change from that one of distress to
one of uh being calm and content right
uh and so the parent hopefully responds then
then to
to
the communication of the emotional state
by the infant sometimes the parent can
you know can behave with joke with the child
child
play peek-a-boo goof off with the child
smile and the child will respond with uh
happiness and joy
being given this attention
this kind of attention from the parents so
so
we can see that they the two can
mutually regulate one another they can
each can affect the others oops each can
affect the other's
emotional state and hopefully again they
so here's a concept that relates closely
to another term there's a term that we
used to talk about in intro to psych
called reciprocal determinism and this
is a
so we can always talk about these
when i talk about one i'm almost talking
about the other so we're going to use
the term reciprocal socialization
because it refers specifically to how
the parent and the infant affect one
another so your definition is a process
by which infants behavior
behaviors invite further responses from parents
parents
which i type twice it looks like for
some reason
and other caregivers
which in turn bring out further responses
responses from
from infants
infants
process by which
infants behavior
see the plural there they put the
apostrophe after the esque because it's plural
plural
by which infants behavior invite further
responses from parents and other caregivers
caregivers
which in turn bring out further
responses from the infant so that's not
totally unrelated
to mutual regulation model in that
each is affecting the other now a
regulation has to do with behavioral and
emotional regulation
socialization here
uh is sort of
that a child an infant can commit a behavior
the
parent responds
and then the child commits another
behavior to which the parent responds to
which the child commits another behavior
so it can go on at infinitum or at least
until everybody goes to bed
that's closely related to the idea of
reciprocal determinism it's just this is
just focusing on the parent and child relationship
relationship
so this process by which the parent and
child each
reciprocally affect one another each
is a way by which children are
socialized the kind of relationship you build
build
through this mutual interaction
is the process by which the child comes
to develop
his or her
individual personality
over time perceptions
behavioral patterns these kinds of
things so reciprocal
reciprocal
socialization is the term there's your
definition for that
and we could we could
try to go beyond that into the more
general idea of reciprocal determinism
reciprocal determinism can go on to
infinity and so can talking about it so
that's good enough we know we know what
all right so here are some other
important terms and important ideas
one thing that i want to do
is differentiate between
personality and temperament these are
terms and concepts that are related
but are not
exactly the same thing
you could say that personality
so these terms are sometimes used in
different ways all right so for instance
carl jung used temperament to mean a
psychologists who study personality use personality
personality
uh with
as opposed to sort of in uh let's say
the average person might use personality
and they may mean something a little bit
different than a psychologist would have
a certain specific definition
so here's what we're here is how we're
using the terms for our purposes for
this class
okay this is our purposes for this class
we might say
that personality and temperament
are related terms with personality often
being more specific or comprehensive as
a term
that's one way you could
personality arguably more being more specific
specific
so let's look at temperament and comment
on that personality and comment on that
so temperament
is uh the pat up
is patterns of arousal and emotionality
that are consistent and enduring
characteristics of an individual
patterns of arousal and
emotionality so those are two
you could say those are two
characteristics patterns of arousal and emotionality
emotionality
whereas
personality is defined as the sum total
of enduring characteristics so that's
all characteristics
uh that differentiate one individual
from another so the definition of
personality one of the things that can
change with the definition of
personality is what you're measuring
so with modern personality studies there
are the big five
personality traits
that include extroversion and
introversion for instance that are also
included in jungian typology
which is different than the modern
uh big five
personality traits so what is
personality well
i mean what are we measuring are we
measuring the big five personality
well researched and there's a lot a
great deal of research that has gone
into sort of saying okay we have these
personality traits that
it looks like all human beings have and
and what
balance and measure do they have
another theorist might use a different
theories of personality might use a
different theory so your definition is
going to vary somewhat based upon your
theory of personality
so what traits and characteristics are
we talking about well it can depend on
the theory but regardless of that the
sum total of all of the characteristics
that are enduring that differentiate one
individual from another is personality
so the definitions we're using in this
class temperament has to do specifically
with arousal and emotionality
and personality has to do with
with
a whole
plethora of
characteristics that differentiate
one individual from another kind of like
this both of these i think are pretty
good definitions
so
there are a number of textbooks that
mention this
and if you speak to doctors or nurses
who work in pediatric care
who work in a hospital they will tell
you that
children are born with a temperament
they can see different patterns of
arousal and emotionality
you know very soon after birth
those things can be observed
so that suggests that we're not born as blank
blank slates
slates right
right
we do have some
information genetic information that
so we're not born with nothing in terms of
of
uh potentials for behavior we are born
with some stuff
and we are different from one another
and we can see there's different patterns
patterns
uh how those patterns differ among
among
children soon after birth and infants before
before
the environment has had much time to
have an effect
so
we'll talk about personality more so
than temperament temperament again we
want to make note of that
and discuss it in the way that we have
but we'll be talking more
in this class as we go on
about personality so this is the thing
we'll talk about more this is useful and
as i said
we do see
medical professionals identify that
differences in temperament can be seen
you know pretty close to immediately
very soon very quickly before the
environment has
a chance to have an impact
on the child's behavior
and then personality this sum total of
enduring characteristics we will be talking
talking
let's see let's say personality social
development how this
it may be enduring but how can this
change from one context to another how
can your behave you have one personality
most of us do uh but it's multifaceted
there's this idea of some people say we
have a multiplicity of selves there's a
term for you multiplicity of selves when
it comes to personality
why is your
behavior different in one context than
in another well it's not because
personality doesn't exist
as some people have incorrectly tried to
argue but because personality is
complicated and your personality
your behavioral tendencies or proclivities
proclivities
manifest themselves differently
depending on the situation you're in
depending on the social situation
depending on what's expected of you and
what you perceive
as the
as what you perceive as how you perceive
the situation so these things can change
so personality is complicated measuring
it there's no one measure
that's perfect
no matter which personality theory or
measuring tool we talk about
personality is difficult to measure it's
complicated and it interacts and we
interact with our environment in varying
ways our differing and changing
environment in various ways
your environment is different at school
than it is at home your behavior is
probably different in some ways at
school than at home or at work
or maybe a little different with one
so it's
and that even relates back to reciprocal
reciprocal
determinism uh so that becomes very
interesting so
as we go through this class and talk
about personality and social development
in subsequent sections
some of this will sort of come out
so let's talk about
one theory of personality as it relates
to development and
and
we'll get into this first stage which i
wrote some things and then we'll talk a
so let's give a definition of erickson
eric erickson developed a theory of
psychosocial development so let's give
you a definition of this
personality develops in a predetermined
order through eight stages of
psychosocial development now
now
this is as opposed to piaget's theory of
development that is a theory of
cognitive development
remember psja developed a theory of
cognitive development we've talked about
him and we'll have a section
on him specifically
we'll have a section on erickson
specifically uh there also sigmund freud
had a developmental theory that involved stages
stages
that those were stages of psychosexual development
development
but in erickson's case
it's unlike either one of those his
stage theory
is a theory of
psychosocial development
how our psychology our personality
changes over time
in response to and with regard to our
social interactions our social realities
as they change over time
from infancy to adulthood during each
stage the person experiences a
psychosocial crisis and
erickson noted that the uh in fact the
refers to both
a challenge and an opportunity
right so we're challenged
we could succeed we could fail but we
also have an opportunity so
the person experiences a psychosocial
crisis there is opportunity here for
in this respect a crisis isn't always a
problem per se right it's an opportunity
which would have a positive or negative
outcome for personality developments and
now i'll read it again
without without interrupting myself
that's a stupid thing to say
interrupting myself i hear people say that
that uh
i'll just read it through without
stopping to explain it because i've
already explained some things so now
personality develops in a predetermined
order through eight stages of
psychosocial development from infancy to
adulthood during each stage the person
experiences a psychosocial crisis
which could have a positive or negative
so when we look at erickson's theory we
will see eight
eight
stages which is also the same thing in
so we'll do a section on
erickson specifically we'll also mention
him in many of our sections that we do
uh many
many very sections that we do we'll also
mention him in many of the sections in
this class
but we will have a section in which we
according to erickson is the trust
so here's your description during this
stage the infant is uncertain about the
world in which they live
and looks toward their primary caregiver
or caregivers
for stability and consistency of care
if the care the infant receives is
consistent predictable and reliable they
will develop a sense of trust which will
carry them
to other relationships and they will be
if these are not if these needs are not
consistently met mistrust suspicion and
anxiety may develop so according to
erickson if a child is
this could potentially affect the
child's development
up for the rest of his or her life now
there may be things that the person can overcome
overcome
but the potential here if the
and we're setting aside abuse which is a
whole other
how much neglect is neglectful
how much care is enough how much
obviously no parent is perfect at any
but it has to be consistent enough
you have to meet a certain some kind of
threshold right and be a good enough
parent to your child for your child to
develop healthily i think that's obvious
at any stage in the child's development
if you're awful enough as a parent
that's a problem if you're okay okay you know
know
if you're terrific that's wonderful
uh but so here we have the trust versus
mistrust stage according to erickson
if you're not getting
beyond the you know these this threshold
consistent care that's predictable and reliable
the child can develop mistrust instead
of trust cannot
may not trust other people may not trust
his or her own safety in the environment
notice this term secure
the world may seem
even more
threatening than it is
to a child
who has not received proper care
consistent care care that's at least
good enough to help the child to develop
trust versus mistrust and if this happens
happens
and these needs are not consistently met
that makes
what er one of the things erickson noted
is problems that are not resolved in one
stage can be resolved later but that of
course is work
it's a lot easier
on the child if the child resolves these
needs and this
crisis at
let's say the proper stage the
appropriate stage
stage where it's supposed to be resolved
where the crisis occurs first
now you can you can we'll get into
ericsson's theory more later you can
revisit correct past crises
you can re-experience past crises that's
we'll get into that more later in this case
case
we are challenged here to understand
this this first stage exists it requires
predictable and reliable care
and this helps the child feel secure
trust in their caregiver trust
trust
is able to more easily develop for
future relationships
and into in a to a degree trust in
themselves because the environment isn't
so threatening that i can't handle it so
with another theorist named karen hornai
who talked about
neurosis and the perception of a
threatening environment so that's
that's another theorist that
relates to erickson although her theory
isn't a stage a developmental stage theory
theory
a theory that has a lot to do with
social development
uh so that karen horne is a wonderful uh
was a wonderful clinician and an amazing mind
so we can connect those ideas
so we the caregiver has a responsibility
responsibility
and in a way that relates to some of the
other material that we've talked about
in this class [Music]
[Music]
i say some of the other material that
we've talked about in this class that
relates to
the care of
of
uh children when we talked about contact
comfort where else that's physical
contact right
and we have some resources up on children
who were not cared for properly in orphanages
if you've seen uh that resource
well that relates to this so
what happened to those children is extreme
extreme
but it is something that
that
so again this when i say this this
let me see if i can articulate this
physical development cognitive
development social and personality development
development
we're talking about them separately but
they're related
if you're so neglected
now this isn't exactly what erickson's
saying of course but if you're so
neglected as a child that your brain
doesn't develop properly
that's going to have an impact on your
development for the rest of your life
there may be some things that cannot be
and that's a terrible tragedy that we've
seen happen
but so we have the physical development
of the brain the cognitive development
that accompanies that
and then as we get more and more
sophisticated our social and personality
development that is evident
in our behavior
and in the way we relate to other human beings
and of course these early stages are
extremely important
and so if nothing else then erickson
so let's talk about gender a bit here so
people sometimes confuse the term gender
and sex
they sometimes confuse the term gender
and sex
we sometimes use them interchangeably
in popular
parlance we
we sometimes use those interchangeably i
think that's changing now
so the term gender does not mean the
same thing as the term sex sex can refer
to anatomy
and in a different definition can refer
to sexual behavior
gender refused to the sense of being
male or female i'm going to fix that
right now or female
i have to remember to save that change
that was a typo so uh gender refu uh
refers to the sense of being male or female
now there are broader definitions of
that because
more common for people to talk about
other gender identities other than male
or female so
there is a more expansive definition
than that
our text uses this idea that gender
refers to the sense of being male or
female we'll add the caveat to that that
we are aware that
that
we are now talking about other genders
and other other gender identities
roles can differ among cultures and
and
sense differs among individuals what
what is your sense of being a male or
female that can differ among individuals
in the same in the same culture right
culture can give you a role a gender
role but your sense of how you embody that
that
even who even individuals who come from
the same culture to whom the same
roles are communicated and sometimes enforced
we sometimes enforce gender roles
that aren't productive
it can be destructive right sometimes
these also change over time gender roles
also change from one society to another
they also
so individuals can hold
differing opinions about what should be
expected of people relating to
gender roles can differ from one society
and gender and sex are different in that
and gender role gender refers to this sense
sense
of male or female or maybe other
maybe non-binary
but refers to this other
other idea
uh we have more resources that are
i think at the time at which i'm
uploading this lecture
lecture
i believe
if i remember correctly i have one more resource
resource
to include in that section
in addition to this and the others that
are already there so
that's at the time of this recording
which by the time you hear it
i say by the time you hear this recording
recording
uh everything is probably going to be already
already
up and available so
you'll have what you need by the time
this is good stuff good material
if you have any questions please contact
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
Works with YouTube, Coursera, Udemy and more educational platforms
Get Instant Transcripts: Just Edit the Domain in Your Address Bar!
YouTube
←
→
↻
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc
YoutubeToText
←
→
↻
https://youtubetotext.net/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc