Hang tight while we fetch the video data and transcripts. This only takes a moment.
Connecting to YouTube player…
Fetching transcript data…
We’ll display the transcript, summary, and all view options as soon as everything loads.
Next steps
Loading transcript tools…
NVIDIA CEO actually said this.. | Asmongold TV | YouTubeToText
YouTube Transcript: NVIDIA CEO actually said this..
Skip watching entire videos - get the full transcript, search for keywords, and copy with one click.
Share:
Video Transcript
Video Summary
Summary
Core Theme
The discussion centers on the profound societal and economic impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly its role in generating knowledge and displacing jobs, and explores Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential solution to mitigate these challenges.
Mind Map
Click to expand
Click to explore the full interactive mind map • Zoom, pan, and navigate
knowledge in the world will be generated
synthetically going forward. You know,
until now
>> the knowledge that we've we have or
knowledge that we generate and we
propagate and we send to each other and
we amplify it and we add to it and we
modify it. We change it
>> in the future.
>> No, it's going to be true. I think he's right.
right.
>> In a couple of years, maybe two or three
years, 90% of the world's knowledge will
likely be generated by AI. Damn.
Damn.
Damn. That's crazy.
>> I know. But it's just fine.
>> But it's just
>> I know. And the reason for that is this.
Let me tell you why. >> Okay.
>> Okay.
>> It's because um what difference does it
make to me
>> that I am learning from a textbook that
was generated by a bunch of people I
didn't know
>> or written by a book that,
>> you know, from somebody I don't know. uh
to uh knowledge generated by AI
computers that are assimilating all of
this and reynthesizing things.
>> I think he's right.
>> I do. I agree with him.
>> To me, I don't think there's a whole lot
of difference.
>> We still have to we still have to fact
check it. We still have to make sure
that it's, you know, based on
fundamental first principles and
>> we still just like we do today.
>> How do you know the AI is correct? How
do you know the textbook is correct? Do
you really think that textbooks report
on things and uh explain things in a way
that's completely unbiased and
reasonable? No, absolutely not. And oh,
there's this. Yeah, I might. Yeah, let's
look at this. So, this is a guy I
remember whenever this guy was running.
See, Andrew Yang ran in 2016,
and this was again almost 10 years ago.
and he ran on the idea of universal
basic income, people getting paid
because he said technology is going to
replace everybody's jobs. Unfortunately, [snorts]
[snorts]
AI is no longer an abstract threat. It's
causing job loss right now. And the
headlines, they tell the story. The
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
MIT, on Wednesday released a study that
found that artificial intelligence can
already replace 11.7% of the US labor
market or as much as 1.2 trillion in
wages across finance, health care, and
professional services. The New York
Times recently reported that Amazon is
on the cusp of replacing what would be
600,000 warehouse jobs with robots. Wow.
Surely it won't. Surely that's the end
of it, right? There's no way technology
will ever improve. This has got to be as
bad. This is going to be as bad as it's
going to get.
>> Plans to automate 75% of its operations.
CNBC reporting that Salesforce, Walmart,
Paramount, UPS, YouTube, and Meta have
all announced new rounds of layoffs
attributable to AI with nearly 1 million
job cuts nationwide this year. That's
the job loss that we can measure. Now
consider what some are predicting about
the future. Goldman Sachs estimating
that 6 to 7% of the US workforce could
be displaced due to AI adoption.
>> Only 6 to 7%. There's no way it's that
low. Maybe it's like in like this year
or something like that, but as a
projection, there's no way. They do note
however that the impact may be only be
transitory because new opportunities
created by AI might ultimately put
people to work in other capacities.
>> I doubt that and I think that to the
extent that it does it will do so at a
10 to1 ratio or something even worse
than that. Like yes AI and technology
will create jobs but it will remove them
at a much higher ratio. A report by the
McKenzie Global Institute finding that
AI could displace 40% of American jobs
due to automation by 2030. That analysis
found that robots and AI agents could
automate more than half of US work
hours, both manual and cognitive using
technology that's available today if
companies redesigned how they'll do
things in the future. The World Economic
Forum projecting that 92 million jobs
worldwide may be displaced by 2030.
Ford's SE
>> that's like [ __ ] four years almost.
Oh my god.
>> Eio saying that AI could replace half of
all white collar workers there. >> Wow.
>> Wow.
>> NYU professor Scott Galloway predicting
that AI will hit middle management first
noting that 6% drop.
>> Yeah. Because they don't [ __ ] do
anything. That's the reason.
>> Managers at public companies since 2022.
So here we are. AI eliminating jobs.
More automation coming. If millions of
people lose work, how will they support
themselves? This is where an idea from
the 2020 presidential campaign returns
to the conversation. Universal basic
income or UBI.
>> Here we go.
>> The concept pretty straightforward.
Every American adult would receive a set
check each month.
>> For Cook County, Illinois, which
includes Chicago,
>> this concept just became reality. The
Cook County Board of Commissioners
unanimously approved its 2026 budget
proposal just this month. It includes
$7.5 million for a guaranteed basic
income program. Commissioners approved
it after the success of a pilot program.
>> The county provided $500 a month to
3,200 households over two years. Survey
findings based on that pilot revealed
that 94% of the program recipients used
the funds to address financial
emergencies. 75% reported feeling more
financially secure. 70% program had a
positive impact on mental health.
>> Of course, there's the question of how
do you pay for it? In the case of
>> Well, you just tax people more [ __ ]
money. Obviously, that's clearly how you
do it. Like, what do you mean how do you
pay for it? It's obvious.
>> County as a result of the decrease in
commercial real estate values.
Everybody's property taxes $500 a month
are now skyhigh.
>> 500 is better than zero. You got to
start somewhere. in Chicago rising 16.7%
the largest jump in at least 30 years.
West Garfield Park saw an increase of
133%. North Lawndale 99% Englewood 82.5%.
82.5%.
>> And there's push back from the Illinois
Policy Institute which cites concerns
about workforce and income effects.
quote, "Cook County is making its
guaranteed income pilot permanent and
committing millions to a failed strategy
already shown to leave people with less
work experience and lower earnings."
>> Back in 20
>> so stupid 20, it was presidential
candidate Andrew Yang who called his
version of universal basic income the
freedom dividend. specifically $1,000
per month. No work requirements, no
means testing, direct payment to help
people cover bills, weather economic transitions,
transitions,
>> and adapt to a job market reshaped
>> by technology.
>> Andrew Yang joins me now. Andrew, nice
to have you back. I pulled a profile of
you from 2018 when you were just on the
cusp of announcing your candidacy.
>> Here's a quote that you provided to the
author of the piece. You said need is
self-driving cars to destabilize society
in a few.
>> Yeah. And he said this in 2018. Now
there's Whimos [ __ ] everywhere.
[snorts] Like self-driving cars is
probably going to be the reason why if
Elon Musk does it the right way, he will
become the world's first trillionaire.
That is it's gigantic. years, we're
going to have a million truck drivers
out of work who are 94% male with an
average level of education of high
school or one year of college. That one
innovation will be enough to create
riots in the street. And we're about to
do the same thing to retail workers,
call center workers, fast food workers,
insurance companies, and accounting firms.
firms.
>> It was seven years ago. How is that
quote aging?
>> It's a aging very, very well.
>> Disturbingly well. Well, unfortunately,
Michael, I'm so glad that we're having
this conversation. 44% of American jobs
are either repetitive manual or
repetitive cognitive.
>> Exactly. Yeah, it they're [ __ ] jobs
where you just put the thing in the box.
Put the thing in the box. Put the thing
in the box. Put the thing in the box.
You really think you can't get a robot
to do that? I mean, what are we talking
about? Of course,
they're bot jobs, literally.
>> And thus could be subject to AI and
automation. And we're seeing that unfold
right now. It's heartbreaking for me
because I feel we could be doing much
much more for the millions of Americans
who are going to be displaced. >> Yep.
>> Yep.
>> I know that Cook County is just a
microcosm, but I'm sure in in hearing
about their experience, people are
wondering, okay, Andrew Yang, we're on
board now. We get it. What you saw seven
years ago, the rest of us see. Yeah.
>> But how do we pay for it?
>> Taxes. More taxes. Obviously,
>> the CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amade, just
raised his hand and said, "You guys
should tax us, the AI firms." And right now,
now,
>> that's true.
>> Hundreds of billions of dollars of value
is being realized by Anthropic and these
other firms on the back, by the way, of
data that we all provided uh unwittingly.
unwittingly.
>> I I I never thought about this. This is
a really good insight that Yeah. I mean,
I I think that to an extent the AI
people should be Yeah. you should be
paying back into the system because
you're the reason like we're the reason
>> actually, you know, didn't agree to it.
>> Um, but it's trillions of dollars of
value and most Americans aren't going to
see a dime of that. So, if you have an
AI company saying you should tax us, I
think we should take him up on his
suggestion. And if if you have an AI tax,
tax,
>> it's I think it's more robotics and
automation in general, right? Right. I
mean you you look at a AI is like a uh
it's a red herring in a degree that like
robotics and automation is really
like this is like an umbrella term and
AI is one thing that's under that
umbrella and sometimes it's above it
depending on what's happening but in a
general sense that's where things are going
going
>> or compute tax you get to very big
numbers very quickly >> robotics.
>> robotics.
So they're now referring to the
magnificent 7 or the S&P
493 instead of the S&P 500. I put a a
graph on the screen right now for the
benefit of everybody at home. The
Washington Post had this coverage. The
the point was that if you strip out
Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta,
Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla,
>> then you know markets.
>> Wait, [laughter] what?
So it's like seven companies that are
tech companies are like mass. I've never
seen this before. So, they're popping
off on this insane level and everything
else is just barely going up. Wow.
Wow.
>> Doing okay, but the market surely is
what it's doing when you include those
seven. And I guess my question for
Andrew Yang is
>> what happens if that is a bubble and it
bursts? Then how do you fund the freedom
dividend or universal basic income?
>> It's not going to burst. It's like
saying the [ __ ] industrial revolution
was a bubble or the internet was a
bubble. Like, are we really going to say
that automating jobs is a bubble? Like,
it's like, oh, cars are a bubble. Horses
are a bubble. What the [ __ ] is this? Who
thinks this?
>> Well, right now, a lot of the value
that's getting generated is being
hoarded or held by a handful of
companies. Michael, I think you're right.
right.
trying to spread value gains more
broadly across the market uh and to people.
people.
>> Well, this has been a problem ever since
the 70s like since I've been before I've
been alive. Uh is that you have like
this is you look at the stock market and
it's going up really fast, right? But
are you guys making any more money? A
lot of people aren't. So a McDonald's
[ __ ] Big Mac is $7 now, but you're
still making five.
What the [ __ ] happened?
So this is the issue. No one buys homes.
Exactly. [snorts] So the problem is that
while the wealth in the country is going
up, it's going up and it's being
disproportionately allocated to like a
few people, literally like a few people
in some cases. And in general, the 1% of
the population has had I think it's like
over 90% of the wealth gains since the
recovery from COVID. Over 90% of all of
the wealth gains are from 1% of the people.
people.
That's insane.
It's ridiculous. And it's going to get worse.
Right now, US GDP is around $85,000
per person and trending upward because
regardless of whether AI as an
investment thesis
>> well I mean a GDP is per person. I mean
this is a this is a mean and not a
median. I think the median is going to
be a lot lower than 80,000. I think
everybody knows that
>> is a little bit overhyped. You know that
it's going to have a positive effect on
GDP. Yeah.
>> So if you have 85,000
>> but this this like this is like these
are like these abstract trillion dollar
numbers like GDP S&P 500 NASDAQ these
are like oh this x amount of trillion
dollars. This is not real to an average
person. It's just not real. They're fake
numbers. The truth is that an average
person goes to the store and they can't
afford groceries. It doesn't matter how
many graphs you show some guy, it's not
going to help him be able to afford his
car. That's the problem is you keep
showing people, oh well, look at the
graph. The graph is going up. That's
nice. But my wage didn't.
That's exactly it. And this is the
problem. This is the disconnect. And
this is the reason why all of these
[ __ ] professionals and experts and
these people are all [ __ ] retards.
They're all retards that are either
lying to you on purpose or they're doing
it on accident. But either way, they're
lying to you. They look at, "Oh, there's
such a big recovery. There's this thing
and that thing." No, it's not. It's
absolutely not a recovery. You go and
ask an average person. You look at a
stock market between now and 2018. You
ask somebody, "Was their life better?
Would they have more purchasing power
between now and 2018?" Unless that
person had a big life change, like they
got a great job or something like that.
I can almost guarant [ __ ] tell you
that back in 2018 their life was better.
Let me ask you guys, was your life did
you have more purchasing power
comparatively in 2018 or do you now? I'm
sure some of you guys will say now
because y'all probably got into a job,
you got into a new career and that's it.
Yeah, absolutely. Right. Yeah. And so
lot a lot a lot of people, right?
Everybody knows this. And so how is it
that the stock market can keep going up?
How is it that the GDP can keep going
up? How is it that every single uh you
know abstraction of the economy can go
up but the average person's lived
experience is that life is getting
worse? Well, the reason why is because
these numbers and these these data
points are deliberately created and
they're used to obfuscate the reality of
the economy to the average person
because all of the rich people don't
want anybody to figure that out. That's
why they keep everybody fighting over.
Oh my god, can you have a transsexual
dog? Wait, how many genders are there?
Look at the Somalians.
Like, I don't think that there should be
a bunch of Somalians here either, but
let's not pretend like that's the main problem.
problem.
It's not even in the top 10. It doesn't
mean that you shouldn't get rid of
people that shouldn't be here, but
that's not the reason why things are a
[ __ ] hole.
That's it. Oh wow.
Can you have a gay kid? Can your kid
transition at seven years old? Why don't
you guys fight each other over that
rather than see that these gra these
graphs are not respective at all of an
average person's experience?
Can robots have genders? Yeah, let's
think about that rather than are robots
going to take your [ __ ] job? And so
this is the problem. And people like
again the Democrat party has been
completely poisoned with identity
politics. Totally poisoned. I think
irrevably so. I don't think that it's
ever going to get out of the identity
politics. I think you need a new party.
It's got cancer and it's terminal. And
the Republican party isn't that much
better. But the Republican party has
been cancer. It has been the party of
big business. It has been the party of,
you know, putting the 1% over the 99%
because you've convinced the 99% that
they are the temporarily embarrassed 1%.
This is what's happened. And so it it's
not like either of these sides are on
your side. Neither of them are America
first. You're talking about
international businessmen, international
business owners that have citizenship,
residences, and living spaces all over
the world. They have no real obligation
to America. They have no loyalty to
America other than the opportunistic
advantage that America would provide
that obviously. Okay. Well, this is the
biggest economy, so I want it to do
well. That's it. That's it. There
there's no uh shared purpose. There's no
shared goal. There's no ideology that's
driving this. It is just simply uh
economic convenience. That's it. That's
all it is. And meanwhile, you're
working. You can't get a [ __ ] job.
You're competing against a robot, a
Somalian, and a woman who gets a higher
[ __ ] score on something because she
was born with a different [ __ ] gender
than you. And meanwhile, you think it's
the it's it's the woman who's the enemy.
No, it's the person who made the system
that did that. But they're they're
keeping you getting mad at them so they
don't so you're not mad at the other
people. That's it. That's the ba that's
the main problem that and and and I want
to say that is the that is the prime
evil. That is the prime ultimate
absolute evil. And it grows bigger every
single year. Every single consumer
metric, every single metric of economic
disparity is showing the two lines
getting farther and farther apart. It
doesn't matter whether it's productivity
and wages. It doesn't matter whether
it's the top 1% and the bottom 50%. It
doesn't matter whether it's home
ownership and renters. Every single
graph shows the exact same thing. I
amazing how nobody sees this because
they're stupid. That's the And I don't
think it's ever going to change. By the
way, I think the American public and the
public in general, the average human
being is so stupid, so selfish, so
shortsighted that at the worst case
scenario, the rich people will just pay
the poor people to kill the other half
of the poor people. pay half the poor
people, they kill the other half, and
then we're going to go right back to
business as usual. This is never going
to get better. I know, I know you might
not believe me, but every country has
this. You think it's perfect in China?
[ __ ] no. They have the same general
problems. In Russia, they have the same
general problems. This is all over the
world. This is a massive issue. Divide.
Divide. Yes. Exactly. How much are we
talking? Yes. This is all over the
world. And and this is also this is a
manifestation of the paro principle 8020
rule that applies to everything in the
world basically where 80% of things are
controlled by 20% of people and the only
difference that we have is that it's not
80% and it's not 20% it's 1% and it's
95%. That's the only difference that we have.
have.
So, yes. And I don't think it's ever
going to get better because nobody's
going to vote for Andrew Yang. Nobody's
going to believe this stuff. Nobody
understands math. Nobody knows what
country they live in. People are, you
know, kids are getting You've got kids
now. They grow up. They're on [ __ ]
loot boxes. They're they're like opening
up loot boxes at four years old getting
addicted to gambling. They get older.
They spend so much time on a tablet they
can't walk. So, their leg muscles aren't
developed. They can't even go upstairs.
They can't read their name. They can't
write their name. They're 9 10 years
old. They can barely figure out what
their [ __ ] name is. Then they go to
middle school and they're getting
bombarded with Only Fans ads whenever
they go on to [ __ ] Instagram or
YouTube kids. And that's if they're not
being [ __ ] pipelined into some
degenerate furry fetish [ __ ] Then you
have on top of that, they're doing
galaxy gas. You've got kids gambling on
rainbed and stake. Then on top of that,
they go, "Oh, you know what? I want to
be a basketball player." Well, there's
no reason to be a basketball player
anymore. Why don't you just bet on the
basketball players? That's what all the
cool celebrities do. So, they're
addicted to sports gambling. And then
they get older, they get addicted to
real gambling. Then they get older than
that. And now they're addicted to
prediction market gambling because it's
being advertised by CNN. And so you have
people, oh, and by the way, they never
learn about statistics. They never learn
about economics. They never learn about
any sort of accounting. The only thing
that they learn about is uh what year uh
some president uh you know decided that
someday would be a holiday, but they
don't know how to balance their taxes.
They don't know what a 1040 is. They
don't know any they don't know what a
statistic is. They don't know what the n
means inside of a sample size in a uh in
a [ __ ] study. So these people are so
functionally [ __ ] [ __ ] that they
might as well just be batteries. They'd
be batteries. They'd be more useful to
society. And this is a carefully
engineered conveyor belt to turn people
into but [ __ ] slaves. Basically,
that's it.
And I I I'm losing my [ __ ] mind. I'm
losing my [ __ ] mind seeing this
happen. And the only way that I can
[ __ ] uh deal with it is I think to myself,
myself,
well, hey, it's not going to happen to
me. It's natural selection. Well, people
are getting selected and it's happening
a lot faster than you think. And the
worst part is they'll select themselves.
If you want to do something that's truly
against the will of the people, put it
to a vote. It's so sad.
It's so [ __ ] sad. That's what I think.
think.
head, then having $12,000 a year, which
I proposed
>> in 2020, actually seems pretty modest
and reasonable, and that's going to be
affordable regardless of what happens
with some of these firms valuations.
>> Oh, and by the way, one little bonus
event. Um, all of this migration and
refugees and migrants and open borders,
this is for the 1% of people. Do you
think this is helping the working class
having to compete with some [ __ ]
migrant from Honduras that's going to
work for $3 an hour? No. But it's
helping the person that owns the
business that's hiring him under the table.
table.
>> As you envisioned the freedom diving,
every everybody gets a check, whatever
that amount.
>> I think you should have means testing
like if if you if you're making over a
hundred grand a year, you shouldn't be
getting a check from the government.
Like realistically,
>> what becomes of other federal
>> that's 10% that by the way that's like
10% of the population. It's a very big
amount of people.
>> Well, I intended the freedom dividend to
try and clear up and clean up some of
the bureaucracy and administration uh
that's currently being applied. I spoke
to a disabled woman in Iowa during the
campaign and she said she wants to
volunteer in her community, but she's
afraid to because she's afraid to lose
her disability payments. And I think
>> That's [ __ ] pathetic.
That's so pathetic.
>> And if if you understand the way that
these uh entitlement systems work, you
would know that she's completely right.
That's exactly how the entitlement
systems work.
>> Would say, "Well, that's not right."
Like the intention is not to
>> And also somebody in chat,
this is a really great statistic.
Did you know that someone who makes
$65,000 a year makes less than someone
that makes $28,000 a year with benefits?
This is a this is a [ __ ] level of
men maxing that should have never
happened. Should have never happened.
And oh yeah, by the way, all the
politicians that support this stuff hate
America. They hate America. They want to
make you a slave. They want to replace
you with a robot. They want to take away
your rights. And they want to make sure
to have you say thank you. And they also
want to moderate your thought to make
sure that you never even consider
saying, "Hey, I don't like this idea.
>> This woman to stay home." So, if you can
put this into people's hands and say,
"Look, this is going to be yours
regardless." uh then it empowers them to
go out and hopefully build things, start
businesses, uh and participate in their
community. Capitalism does not work very
well if people don't have money to spend.
spend. >> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> So, is this
>> not capitalism? I mean, it's it's just
really not.
>> Capitalism that we're talking about, it
sounds rather socialist, doesn't it?
That everybody's going to get a check
and therefore they won't have to go to
work because
>> this is the most [ __ ] [ __ ]
oversimplification that I've ever heard.
Yes. Very obviously there are things
that are different between being
capitalist and socialist. We have social
[ __ ] security. We have food stamps.
Like this entire idea that all
capitalist things are good or bad and
all socialist things are good or bad is
the reason why I think that there will
never be an advancement and any sort of
collective class consciousness because
people are so brain dead [ __ ]
[ __ ] that they can never even be
able to see. They can't understand
things on anything that's not a
buzzword. They're like uh [ __ ]
Pavlovian dogs. They hear the word socialism.
socialism. [panting]
[panting]
What? Whether they like it or not, they
just they have some sort of [ __ ] uh
it's like a like Zoolander, right? Where
>> Jobs are being taken by AI
>> for nuance. Exactly. Initially,
>> that's why they're going to be batteries.
batteries.
>> It's capitalism where income doesn't
start at zero. Michael. Uh, and you have
a consumer economy
>> that is predicated on folks being able
to participate. And if you shove
millions of Americans to the curb via AI
and automation, then they're not going
to be able to go to their local
business. They're not going to be able
to to uh meaningfully uh grow the
economy. They're going to stay at home.
They're going to end up going down
internet rabbit holes and getting
radicalized in many cases. I think
that's another really great point is
that the reason why a lot of people are
radicalized is because their life sucks
dick. Your life sucks massive dick. You
have been completely disenfranchised
from every single institution and social
and political apparatus that exists.
[snorts] Of course you're going to be a
communist. Of course you're going to
like Hitler because you don't really
like Hitler or like communism. You just
hate your current system so [ __ ] much
that you want anything that is as
antithetical and destructive to it as
possible to replace it. That's what you
really want.
>> That's a loss. And so if if we can get
people connected in various ways, uh
that's the direction we should go. And
I'm not someone who thinks that this
money is a silver bullet. It's going to
do the trick. I mean, you still have to
uh convey structure, purpose,
fulfillment, community, all of the rest
of it that jobs uh traditionally have provided.
provided.
>> Andrew, a final question. There's an
academic in the on deck circle, and I'll
bet you've read the stories. It's it's
Dr. Yampolski who's been quoted as
saying that he thinks in 5 years we'll
have 99% unemployment. I'll see it.
>> Come on. Like, what are we talking
about? The most extreme example
>> in a moment. whether he's going to stand by.
by.
>> Jesus Christ, this bald [ __ ] is just
out of control. He's out. He's out of control.
control.
>> That prediction. How bad does Andrew
Yang think it will get undeterred?
>> No, it's going to get bad. I certainly
don't think 99% bad. But if you use this 44%
44%
uh of jobs subject to automation as a
benchmark and then you figure that we're
going to turn through let's say half of
those jobs uh over the next 10 years or
so um that puts you at 30 to 40 million
jobs that get eliminated insane and that
would be devastating. That would be
catastrophic for many many communities.
And I think that's a realistic place to
think we we're going to be heading. And
you can see how also what I think is
funny about this is that CNN is playing
its role inside of this ecosystem by
presenting these nonsensical most
radical possible ideas and then creating
a artificial permission structure to
disregard them based off of their most
exaggerated extrapolation.
>> Andrew Yang, thank you for framing in
the worst way possible.
>> Perfect guest on this day.
>> Thanks for having me, Michael. Wish I
had better news, but
>> go to my
>> hopefully so. Go to my website. It's
marcottage.com. This is today's poll question.
question. >> Jesus.
>> Jesus.
>> Is guaranteed income a realistic remedy
for job loss due to AI. Go vote.
>> Well, there you go, guys.
There you go. In case you were confused,
in case you're like, "Ah, well, maybe
they're giving him a fair shake." Well,
now you know that's not the case. What's
funny is people watching this interview
only heard 99% unemployment. Exactly.
Yeah. It's just like it's like what are
you talking about? Like you pick the
most extreme possible thing and then you
base everything off of that directly.
It's crazy crazy. Uh when I was
streaming the money I made streaming
help supplementary uh the money I made
working I was doing 14 to 18 hours a
day. It's not practical. Yeah. It's
awful. Absolutely. Yeah. 100%. I think
they need to frame it as worse as
possible to get those old bags in
government to move on policy. I I think
that you are being way too generous
towards them. I don't think that is what
they are doing at all. Yeah, I have I I
do not believe that. I don't think that.
Absolutely [ __ ] not. I think that
they are trying to delegitimize it,
trying to make it look as invalid and
ridiculous as possible in order to
basically protect uh uh you know protect themselves.
Click on any text or timestamp to jump to that moment in the video
Share:
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
One-Click Copy125+ LanguagesSearch ContentJump to Timestamps
Paste YouTube URL
Enter any YouTube video link to get the full transcript
Transcript Extraction Form
Most transcripts ready in under 5 seconds
Get Our Chrome Extension
Get transcripts instantly without leaving YouTube. Install our Chrome extension for one-click access to any video's transcript directly on the watch page.
