This content provides a preview of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) Gameweek 35, focusing on the confirmed Double Gameweek 36, captaincy choices, and a Wildcard team strategy, while also addressing audience questions about player selections and team structure for the remaining weeks of the season.
Mind Map
Nhấn để mở rộng
Nhấn để khám phá sơ đồ tư duy tương tác đầy đủ
What is going on everyone? My name is
Andy. Welcome back to another FPL video.
In this one, it's the gameweek 35
preview. So, I'm going to talk about the
double gameweek announcement that we had
yesterday. Go through captaincy, a wild
card team for gameweek 35, then answer a
bunch of your questions. So, let's get
into it. So, let's start with the double
gameweek announcement that came
yesterday. Double game week 36 is now
official. Man City will play Brenford at
home, Crystal Palace at home, and
Crystal Palace will play Everton at
home, Man City away. There are no other
double game weeks or blanks for the rest
of the season unless something
unforeseen happens. Man City did request
that the Bournemouth game came forward
to gameweek 36 instead. There was always
an outside chance of that happening, but
the Premier League said no. So, if
you've heard people like me say there's
potential chance for Bournemouth to have
a double and a blank. That is not
happening. Bournemouth's fixtures just
stay the same for the rest of the
season, single game weeks every single
week. In terms of Man City and Chelsea
being in the FA Cup final, their
fixtures were postponed on the Sunday in
gameweek 37. They've now been moved to
the Tuesday. The Premier League also
confirmed that Aston Villa or Forest,
whoever gets to the Europa League final,
will have their match from Sunday in
gameweek 37 moved to Friday. So although
the FPL website says we've got a Sunday
deadline for gameweek 37, that will 100%
be Friday deadline instead. The only
slight issue with that is the FA Cup
final will be played before Man City and
Chelsea play their games in gameweek 37.
So we'll have a Friday deadline, FA Cup
final on Saturday, Chelsea Man City. If
any of the players get injured and can't
play their Premier League game on
Tuesday, obviously you won't be able to
react to that. Most people have got
three Man City. Some of you might have
one, two, or three Chelsea as well.
There's not a huge amount you can do.
You just got to take the risk and hope
that in any, you know, scenario where a
player gets injured, your bench can help
out and stuff like that. Maybe when we
get to gameweek 37, we start talking
about potentially transferring some of
these players out. But I think for
Chelsea in particular, there Spurs at
home and you'll probably want to keep
most of your Man City as well. But we
can discuss that later on. Back to
double game week 36. For most people,
the Man City announcement is not really
going to change anything. Most of us are
already tripled up on Man City, and for
the most part, you should probably just
keep the triple up you have. I know some
people are talking about, I've got four
or five transfers, I've got Semeno,
should I switch to Churkey? If you've
got nothing else to do, then fair
enough. But for most people, just keep
the triple up you've got. And that will
probably be three of four players. So,
Harland, Semeno, Cherokee, and O'Reilly.
If you've got Gay or Nunees or someone
like that instead, that's absolutely
fine as well. Triple captainers, you can
rejoice, especially if you got no other
chips to play, you should absolutely use
that on Harland in gameweek 36. And the
fact that the title race is still open
means the minutes will be really good.
Do I regret using my triple captain on
Gabrielle? Of course I do. I wish I
could use it on Harland instead. For
Crystal Palace, it's a little bit
trickier to know what to do to be honest
with you. If I was wild carding this
week, I would probably choose three. And
I'll talk about wild card a little bit
later, but basically Crystal Palace have
got their Europa Conference League
semi-final first leg this Thursday. Then
they've got gameweek 35. I suspect they
will rotate a little bit against
Bournemouth. Then they've got the second
leg next Thursday. Then Everton at home,
the first game of gameweek 36, and then
Man City away, which is obviously the
midweek game. So if you have a look at
gameweek 36, they play on the Sunday.
they have to because of um Europe on
Thursday and then the game against Man
City is on Wednesday. There is probably
going to be some rotation. Glanser is
the manager that never rotates, but
they're in a European semi-final. He's
already rotated Sar a couple of times.
I'm just not sure who you pick that's
definitely going to start both games in
the double. Like the most obvious pick
is Henderson, I suppose, and then Laqua
plays every minute of pretty much every
game. So, there is a chance he will play
Bournemouth and Everton and Man City.
But honestly, I I don't know if it's a
guarantee for any player. And I don't
think that Glaz is necessarily going to
rotate the whole team, but you can do it
in stages, right? You can rest some
players for Everton, then maybe some
players for Man City. I'm looking at
Crystal Pal. I just, and I hate saying
this because I love going all in on
double game weeks. I just don't think a
triple up is necessary. Like trying to
pick three players that are definitely
going to play every game, it it just
seems really difficult. So the safest
picks are probably Henderson, then
Laquire. It gets tricky after that, but
you're probably looking mostly at
defenders, Munoz and Richards,
and that's about it. It's not that
interesting really. Like S I just think
I'm going to go against I think there's
every chance he only starts one game in
that double. And what if it's the Man
City away game? By the way, of course,
Crystal Palace are a good team and they
can cause Man City problems. But if I
said to you right now, do you want to
bring a Crystal Palace player in for Man
City away?
No, of course not. So, I don't know. In
certain situations where maybe you've
got lots of free transfers and not much
else to do, I don't mind bringing Palace
players in then selling them again.
Because if you ask me what to do with
your transfers right now, I don't think
there's a huge amount of interesting
things to use them on, like players to
bring in. Okay, Arsenal's fixtures for
the next four game weeks are pretty
good. Mostly you want defenders, but
then I'm also saying you want O'Reilly
from Man City. You might want one or two
Palace defenders. Where do all these
Arsenal defenders fit in? Maybe you have
Gabrielle and Rya. Is that super
interesting? I mean, Gabrielle, of
course, Rya is fine if you need a new
goalkeeper. If you don't, then you just
don't need to buy him. Go and buy a Rice
or EZ. It's absolutely fine, but most of
you have already got probably a decent
enough attack. I don't know what the
other transfers are supposed to be used
on. Like there's just not that many.
Like even when I did the wild card
draft, which I'll talk about soon,
there's not that many interesting picks
on it, there just doesn't seem to be a
huge amount of differentials to kind of
go for right now. So if you've got lots
of transfers saved up and you want to
use them on Palace players, then by all
means go for it. The only thing I would
say with them is in gameweek 37, it's
Brenford away, which is okay, but it's
not exactly an amazing fixture for a
defender, and then gameweek 38 is
against Arsenal. And at that point,
Crystal Palace are probably going to be
safe, nothing to play for, and they may
well be in a European final, which is
the midweek after gameweek 38. So, they
could even rest players in that Arsenal
game. So, it's all a bit of a an
anti-limax in some ways. Lots of
transfers or wild card, I probably would
look to double or triple up on Crystal
Palace for everyone. Like, I just think
Sar's almost a no-go. And then Matta and
Strson are sharing minutes. and which
other attacker do you buy? I think it's
basically defenders
or you're taking a big risk essentially.
So, let's talk about captaincy for
gameweek 35. For most people, it's going
to be between Erling Harland against
Everton away and Bruno Fernandez against
Liverpool at home. You know, when the
deadline happens and then an hour or so
later, you can set your team for the
next week. I almost always do that
straight away, change my bench players,
switch captaincy and stuff like that.
And I just put it on hard without really
thinking about it. And I think that's
where it's going to stick. And I think
it's mostly because Bruno Fernandez has
got Liverpool at home. And despite how
consistent Fernandez has been and
despite this not being the strongest
Liverpool team or anything like that, I
still don't like that as a fixture for
captaincy unless the alternatives were
absolutely terrible. And I just don't
think they are. And Liverpool's expected
goals conceded this numbers this season
have not been that bad. Also, and we
might just be seeing things that aren't
there, but it did feel like in that
Brenford game that Bruno Fernandez was
looking for assists way more than goals.
Like even for that Seshko goal, I think
there was a chance for Bruno Fernandez
to shoot and he didn't take it. Now,
maybe he would have done that anyway.
Like I said, I might be talking absolute
nonsense. Maybe he would have played
exactly the same game if he wasn't close
to the assist record, but it just felt
like with that Chesko goal, he could
have shot and he didn't. He delayed it
and in the end it worked out really
well. So who am I to say he did anything
wrong, but if he's going to be mostly
looking for assists, they're not
obviously worth as mo as much points.
Now Fernandez is great for bonus. So he
can still get a big score off assist
rather than goals. I don't know. Maybe
I'm just looking for excuses to captain
Harland. I don't know, but Harland is
probably where I'm going to go despite
it being Everton away. There are a
couple of alternatives if you want to go
different. Now Thiago is quite highly
owned, but him against West Ham at home
I quite like. Despite him not being on a
graphic, but if you're looking for a
differential, I think Cal Lewin against
Bernie at home is decent enough. His
underlying numbers are very similar to
Thiago. I expect him to play this game
and he's on penalties as well and he's
got a better fixture. Like West Ham at
home is not bad for Brenford, but you'd
rather play Bernie at home. Worst
defense in the league this season. So I
think Cal Lewen huge differential. I
don't know if I could personally do it
because I find Cavalu quite frustrating
to watch sometimes. Like look at the
chances he had against Man United that
he didn't put away, but he's someone you
could look at. And if you want to go
for, I don't know, blind faith, whatever
you want to call it, Cole Palmer against
Forest at home is going to be a massive
differential. And I can tell you why
he's going to be a massive differential
because I've just mentioned his name for
captaincy. And there's already people
writing comments telling me I'm an idiot
for even mentioning Cole Palmer for
captaincy. Like I said, it's a punt,
right? because a lot of the time people
say they want to do something different
but they don't really want to take a
punt and that's fine. Palmer is a punt
at this point. Not many people are going
to captain him. Forest at home is okay
and who knows under the new manager or
manager they've had for some time before
and he's back again. Maybe they'll do a
little bit better than they were doing
under a senior. So Harland is probably
the one for me. I think Fernandez is
fine, but I just think if I'm going to
go against Har, I think Harlem will be
the most captain player this week. If
I'm going to go against him, maybe I do
it with something more interesting than
Liverpool home. Calbertt Lewin, Thiago
Palmer is probably where I'd be looking.
Let's talk about wild card for gameweek
35. And the core of your squad basically
revolves around three teams. So Arsenal
because of how good their fixtures are
for the rest of the season, then Man
City and Crystal Palace because they're
doubling in gameweek 36. I did say
earlier you don't necessarily need a
double or triple up on Crystal Palace.
And I think people without wild card may
well just ignore them completely, but if
you're on wild card, part of the
advantage is being able to set up for
that double, roll a few transancers,
then deal with it later on for game
weeks 37 and 38. So I have gone for
Triple Palace, but no attackers. I just
don't trust S Meta or Strand Lson's
minutes enough. Now, if one of them,
like Strand Lson for example, was to
pick up an injury on Thursday in Europe,
maybe you then look at Mateta, but there
are quite a good few forwards you can
choose from. Whereas with the defenders,
you can always hide them on the bench.
So, I've gone for Henderson. I think
he's a no-brainer. He's the most likely
to start both games in the double. And
then Munos and Laquire. If you can't
afford either of them, you can go for
the cheaper defenders like Richards for
example. But Munos is the most attacking
and Laquire I think is probably the
safest for minutes in that defense. So
that's why I've chosen those three
players ready for gameweek 36. You may
well only get one game out of them. That
game might be Man City away. That's the
risk you take, but I think it's worth
taking on wild card 35. For City, I've
gone for O'Reilly, Churkey, Harland. I
don't think that's any surprise.
O'Reilly is the best defender. Harland
you almost have to have. And Churkeyy's
looking like the best attacker right
now. If you want to go for Semeno
instead, absolutely fine. But I would
probably go for Churkey. Also, he's
cheaper and actually money was quite
tight with this squad. And if you've got
lower team value, you're going to have
to make some downgrades elsewhere
anyway. So Chucky over Semeno,
not just because of how good he's
looking right now, but also because of
money. And then for Arsenal, I've gone
for the most vanilla, boring setup you
could possibly go for. Rya, Gabrielle,
and Rice. Cibbra is also fine. Triple
Arsenal defense is fine, but I think
because you've got so many defenders
from double gameweek teams for 36, it's
harder to fit in Arsenal defenders
alongside them. You obviously want
Gabrielle because of how good he is.
It's just easier to put Ryer in rather
than Celiba because taking up a
goalkeeper spot is not as important as
it is with defenders. I wouldn't usually
spend that much money on goalkeepers,
Ryer and Henderson, but you've only got
four weeks left. Unless you can find a
specific reason you're going to need
that money for, I really wouldn't worry
about it. So, that's the three from
Palace City, uh, Arsenal. I mean, Bruno
Fernandez almost has to be in there as
well. So, that's kind of your 10th
player. You've only got five of the
other players to pick. Thiago, I think,
is probably one of the best forwards for
the rest of the season. C, despite the
two away games that he's got against
City and Liverpool. Cavaloon's got
Bernie at home this week and he's cheap.
Jubury Hall is my cheap uh midfielder on
the bench for this week, but you could
play him in other game weeks. And then
I've got Stra in defense. I picked a
Lee's defender instead of a Bournemouth
one. There is a question about them
later on, mostly because it's Burnley at
home this week and I think they've got
slightly better fixtures for the rest of
the season. The likes of Hill and Sessi
are extremely good for Defcon, but I
think Elise defender might be slightly
more useful later on. The only issue
might be if they start rotating because
they've got nothing to play for, but I
don't know if that's going to happen. So
Strauss seems the most nailed. That's
why I've gone for him. And then my other
pick is Rogers. Now I'm not completely
happy about that pick because there
might be some rotation against Spurs or
Burnley. I think more so Burnley because
that's going to be the time they may
well have Champions League wrapped up.
But I think it's while like I think you
have to think for your own team. How
many transfers do I have? Right? Do I
like these players? How many other
players do I want to bring in later on?
If you're happy with this team and you
think you can roll it for a couple of
game weeks, then maybe you deal with
Rogers in 37 or 38 and look to sell him
then. But for the next couple like I I I
just think that's a I don't know one of
the advantages on being on wild card 35.
You can put a Villa player in whereas
most people are not on wild card.
They're not going to use a transfer I
don't think to get Rogers then take him
back out. So I quite like him and he
just easier to fit in than Watkins. I
also thought about putting Harry Wilson
on this team. If I had more team value,
I'd probably have Harry Wilson instead
of Jubury Hall because I think the
fixtures for um Fulham are pretty good
after gameweek 35. Some of you would
have picked up Harry Wilson really cheap
as well. So, if you can fit him in, I
probably would. I just I really
struggled to find interesting players.
Like I I really did. Like I'm not on
wild card, so I haven't given it as much
thought as if I was, but but I did
obviously set it up for this video. And
you know, I've got Palmer, but it's you
struggle to fit him in with um the bench
that I've got here. Same with Sacka
because of the value, right? Like if you
could have Saka instead of Rice, maybe
EZ. Ez's in the squad for the Champions
League game, so he should be fit for
gameweek 35 as long as he comes through
tonight's game. Okay, maybe you go for
EZ instead of Rice. but like loads of
really great differentials. I'm just not
sure they're necessarily there. One
other thing about this team quickly, I
know people are going to ask me about
bench boost. I didn't set this up
specifically for bench boost in a
specific week because obviously people
might have triple captain left. So they
might want to triple captain 36, bench
boost 37. Some people might want to
bench boost in 36. I think it works kind
of okay for either week. So this is what
it looks like in the my team tour on
Fantasy Football Hub. By the way, you
can see what I'm saying about Celiba.
So, for gameweek 36, you've got Laqua,
Mun, O'Reilly, and Gabrielle. Like, you
could play a back five, but then you'd
have to have Cibba instead of Stra or
Crab instead of one of the double game
weeks. So, I just think Rya fits in a
little bit better. With this specific
team, I would probably play Cal Lewen
over Thiago, although that's debatable.
So, your bench in 36 is Rya West Ham
away, Thiago City away, Ju Hall, Palace
away, Stra Spurs away. It's not amazing.
I'm not going to lie to you, but I also
think there's no there's not necessarily
like an amazing um bench boost week
left. If you specifically want to do it
in 36 and you probably want to look at
some Brighton players because they've
got Wolves at home that week. So maybe
Gross instead of Drewbury Hall or Van
Heck instead of Stra if you can afford
it, if you want to make the bench a
little bit better. And then 37,
if I just change this around, you've got
Minos and Laqua against Brenford away
and Henderson as well. and then Rogers
Liverpool home. I mean, that's not
great. I won't lie to you. Um, and if
you've got triple captain, you The
problem is, right, if you've got triple
captain, you want to use it in 36. Then,
yes, you probably want to switch some of
those players, but then you also want
the Palace players for the double in 36.
So, I think if you if you want to bench
boost 37, you've probably got to be
prepared to use some transfers. Maybe
just change it around a little bit
because you want those Palace players
for 36. So, maybe you switch them to
someone else. else. I mean, if we look
at gameweek 37,
cheap players, I mean, Newcastle, but
you're going for players like Chiao. So,
maybe Mino to Chiao. Um, you probably
don't want to bring in too many Chelsea
players for Spurs at home because they
play the FA Cup final beforehand.
Everton would be pretty good. In fact,
oh yeah, Juul goes into the team because
it's Sunderland at home. So, maybe like
a Tarovski or a Keen because Branway's
out for a while. So, I think for bench
boost 37, you probably want to use some
transfers because you need those palace
players for 36. For gameweek 36 bench
boost, it's okay. It's not amazing, but
if you can use it without having to use
a bunch of transfers, that's probably
fine. So, a team like that is probably
not the perfect team. You can make
changes for your team value, your
preferences, but I think it works fairly
well. So, let's get into some of your
questions. Is Triple Arsenal defense the
right play for the next three? I already
have Gabrielle and Ryer, and I'm
thinking about selling Sessi for Celiba.
So, triple Arsenal defense definitely
viable. Fulham at home, West Ham away,
Bernie at home. Next three look good.
And even Palace away in gameweek 38
might not be as bad as it looks on
paper. If Palace gets to the Europa
Conference League final because then
they'll almost certainly rotate in
gameweek 38. So, Arsenal defenders are
good. If you want to go for three, you
absolutely should. The only thing I will
say, it's not an absolute necessity to
be tripled up on Arsenal from this
point. Obviously, the fixtures are good,
but it doesn't mean you have to go out
of your way to get three. And I
discussed this when I was talking about
wild card 32 versus 35. And I felt like
if I wild carded in 32 and I got to 35
and I didn't have an Arsenal attacker,
it probably wouldn't be the end of the
world to not have Declan Rice in my
team. Now, in the meantime, EZ is um
kind of, you know, become an option. So,
maybe that is a bit more interesting,
but you get what I mean, right? It's
good to have Declan Rice as a solid
pick. If I was on wild card, I would
consider him, but I'm not sat here
worried that I don't have him. Likewise
with Celiba. Like right now, I've got no
Arsenal defenders. I may well bring in
Gabrielle this week, but I'm not sat
there worried that I haven't got Celiba.
Arsenal defense best in the league, but
Celiba is not great for defcons. He
doesn't really have the attacking threat
either. So, personally, I'd much rather
just play Sessi and roll the transfer.
Like, Cessi's got a palace at home
fixture against a team that may well
rotate because of Europe. and he's great
for defcons as well. And his attacking
threat's not bad either. So getting
Celibra and tripling up on the defense
is a differential. It is viable, right?
I'm not trying to talk you out of it,
but I would personally much rather just
have Sessi and a free transfer next week
and decide what to do then. Maybe then
you do Sessi to SA or maybe you get a
double gameweek defender in instead. And
it goes back to what I was saying on the
wild card. Do you have space for this
Arsenal defender? Obviously, your team
might be set up differently, but I've
got Cessi, Straco, Riley. For me, it's a
bit different because I don't have
Gabrielle. So, that is maybe a viable
transfer, Cessi to Gabrielle, but Cessi
to Celiba. I'd rather just have Senessi.
And then next week, O'Reilly's got a
double game week. Van Hick's got Wolves
at home and then maybe I bring in a
Palace defender instead. So, there's
still no room for Celiba in the back
three. So, it all depends how your team
is set up. Triple Arsenal defense is
great. Having triple Arsenal for the
next three game weeks, four game weeks
is also pretty good, but it's not an
absolute necessity. And yes, I'd rather
roll the transfer than get Cibbra, I
think. So, now that the Palace double
game week is confirmed, what should we
do with Bournemouth players? And who
should we play out of Bournemouth
defenders versus Lee's defenders this
week, i.e. Be versus Hill. So, in
general, I think Bournemouth players are
not one to panic about like Crystal
Palace at home is absolutely fine
because of that rotation that we're
expecting and also it's a home game.
Hill and Senessi are good for defcons.
Tair may well take a penalty especially
if Krooppie is not on the pitch. He's a
good cheap value option. If you've got
Krooppy then he's just a bench spot for
most weeks anyway. I think Bournemouth
players this week no need to panic after
that the fixture is not so good. So
Fulham away City at home Forest away I
would say at that point they become
sellable but they're not must sells. So
if I had to play Sessio Hill against
Fulham away or Forest away it's probably
not going to be the end of the world. If
I have to play Tava in any of the
remaining matches, I don't really care.
So, I think sellable after 35, but I
wouldn't necessarily be in a rush to
sell them. I will say I will probably
sell one of my Bournemouth defenders in
36 or 35 for an Arsenal or Palace
defender. Obviously, Arsenal this week,
Palace next week, but only because I
don't really want to sell any of the
others, not because they're necessarily
terrible. So, I wouldn't panic about
Bournemouth players, but they're less
interesting now. They're not going to
double in 36. Who to play this week? I
think my my gut feeling and my
preference is probably leads defenders
just because it's Bernie at home. But
that does depend on which defender
you've got. Is BL 100% nailed now
Rodon's back? I'm not sure he is. Now,
if Goodmanson is out, BL probably plays
because Justin and Bogle will play as
the wing backs presumably unless they
play a back four, but I'm going to
assume they're going to stick to the
back three for the most part. So maybe
in the be all hill case you go for the
safe and nailed on player that's also
amazing for defcons and has not got a
bad fixture this week. But if you're
certain your leads player is going to
start i.e. you've got Stra or or
Goodmanson's fit or something like that
then I think you play the leads defender
purely because it's Burnley. I know
Palace might rotate. I know Bournemouth
are probably the stronger team but
Burnley at home does a lot of heavy
lifting here. So that is my preference
if you're sure your defender is going to
start. Otherwise, playing it safe is
never a terrible option. Hill and Sessi
both good this week. So, if you own
Simeeno and Harlem, would you go for
Churkey or O'Reilly for the final spot?
What a tricky question because they're
both really good FPL picks. I'm going to
use the easy way out first of all, which
may or may not help you. Look at your
specific squad and determine whether
you've got a space for a midfielder or a
defender. So what I mean by that is you
might be sat there right now with
Gabrielle Lee's defender and then a
Bournemouth defender which looks quite
good in game week 35 and actually your
defense is all right for the rest of the
season but you could do with a
midfielder upgrade. Therefore go for
Churkey. It may be the other way around
and there's not really a right or wrong
answer here. They are both good FPL
picks. Now you might turn around and say
that doesn't really matter. I could do
with a defender or a midfielder so I'm
still not sure who to go for. Gut
feeling is O'Reilly. Basically, I I
don't know if I've got a strong reason
for that, but that's my gut feeling.
Probably because I've already got
O'Reilly and that's probably playing a
part. There's probably some bias there
because he's already in my team. But I
think if I'm thinking of defenders, top
two right now, it's probably Gabrielle
and O'Reilly. Now, that changes slightly
week to week, especially with the double
game week in 36. But both these players
have a double. So, if I'm looking at top
two defenders, I think it's Gabrielle
and it's O'Reilly. And I don't think
there's really too many arguments
against that. Now, you could argue that
Churkey is the second best midfielder
behind Bruno Fernandez. And that's fair,
but I don't think it's as strong an
argument as it is with O'Reilly. I think
you can put other midfielders in the
mix. Like when I look at my team, for
example, right? Let's say that I didn't
have O'Reilly and I had Hill in defense
instead and I've got Palmer, Semena,
Fernandez, Tavanir. I'd rather add
O'Reilly to my defense than I think add
Cherokee to the midfield. Like most
people have got Fernandez. You've
already said you've got Semeno. I'm
happy enough with Palmer personally.
Like Churkeyy's definitely playing
better right now and in the better team,
but I like Palmer as the differential
this week. And Tavan is okay as a cheap
option as well. Now again, you could
just say, well, hang on. Hill, Stra, and
Sessi are also fine. I get it, right?
It's a really close decision. That's why
you're asking. I just think I'd rather
add O'Re. I just think his goal threat
is so good. I'd struggle to go without
him. Whereas Churkey is good, but I
don't feel as bad about not owning him.
I mean, ideally you have O'Reilly,
Cherky, and Harden, I think, at the
moment. But if you've already got
Simeno, I wouldn't sell him. So, gut
feeling, and there's probably a lot of
bias there because I already own him is
O'Reilly. And it's just because I think
there's a stronger argument he's the
second best player in his position right
now than there is with Churkey.
Although, if someone said they thought
Cherky was top two, I probably wouldn't
have a strong argument against it. I
just think there's other midfielders I'm
kind of okay with,
less so with defenders, but it's it's oh
god, it's such a horrible call.
O'Reilly, there you go. If you have to
pick one, I'm going to say O'Reilly.
Goalc scoring defenders are hard to come
by, but Churkey is great, too. I'm going
to leave it there. If you enjoyed it,
make sure to give it a like and hit that
subscribe button. And I'll be back
Nhấn vào bất kỳ đoạn văn bản hoặc mốc thời gian nào để nhảy đến phần đó trong video
Chia sẻ:
Hầu hết transcript sẵn sàng trong dưới 5 giây
Sao Chép 1 Chạm125+ Ngôn ngữTìm kiếm nội dungNhảy đến mốc thời gian
Dán URL YouTube
Nhập link bất kỳ video YouTube để lấy toàn bộ transcript
Form Trích Xuất Transcript
Hầu hết transcript sẵn sàng trong dưới 5 giây
Cài Tiện Ích Chrome Của Chúng Tôi
Lấy transcript ngay mà không cần rời khỏi YouTube. Cài tiện ích Chrome để truy cập transcript của bất kỳ video nào ngay trên trang xem, chỉ với một cú nhấp.
