0:01 what's up guys welcome back to the
0:02 channel today i bring you the much
0:05 anticipated review of the arendelle 1961
0:08 1s subwoofer so uh the reason this got
0:09 my attention is because of you guys in
0:11 the comments a lot of you guys were like
0:13 hey i like have you heard of erindel
0:14 subwoofer or like what do you think
0:15 about erindale subwoofer or like when i
0:16 would review something else you'd be
0:17 like how does that compare to arendelle
0:20 subwoofers so i got curious i saw spare
0:22 change review their larger theater
0:23 models and i noticed the front baffle
0:25 was kind of narrow and it had this like
0:26 unique shape and it's cool attention to
0:28 detail and i was like you know what
0:29 let's start let's try to get one of
0:32 these here and talk about it so here we
0:33 go we'll do this review the same way we
0:34 generally do i'll tell you about some
0:36 specs and standout features i'll throw
0:37 the main ones on screen right now so you
0:38 can check that out i'll tell you a
0:39 little bit about what it sounds like
0:41 we'll do some comparisons and then we'll
0:43 wrap it up so first let's talk about
0:45 some standout features first is going to
0:48 be the obvious shape and design where
0:49 you know instead of having a driver on
0:51 the front as you can see on the screen
0:53 behind me the driver is side firing
0:55 we've got a single 12.2 inch driver on
0:56 the side that gives you it gives it a
1:00 narrower front baffle so you know for
1:01 those of you that maybe in the past
1:03 could only fit like a single eight inch
1:06 driver or ten inch driver because your
1:08 front wall wasn't very wide perhaps you
1:11 could fit a 12 inch now anyhow
1:12 yeah i think the shape is super cool
1:14 definitely stand out future second thing
1:16 as you heard me say it's a 12.2 inch
1:18 driver that's a little bit bigger than
1:20 the average 12-inch driver so uh you
1:21 know i know that doesn't sound like a
1:23 lot and it's not a lot but it is worth
1:25 mentioning and the reason being
1:27 is the outer edge of a circle is going
1:29 to give you more surface area than its
1:32 inner edge will obviously because it
1:34 gets bigger simple geometry right
1:36 and you know if you have like the sd
1:38 spec for example of the subwoofer which
1:39 tells you it's surface area of the
1:41 moving mass you would see it should be
1:43 larger than your average torment driver
1:45 anyhow some other standout features are
1:46 going to be and this is this is my
1:48 favorite one
1:50 no vinyl finish it's not even an option
1:53 standard painted finish is what you get
1:56 now is it like the highest end painted
1:57 finish like 10 coats of hand rubbed
1:59 lacquer like you find on rails like s
2:00 series subwoofers that are three
2:03 thousand dollars no is it worlds better
2:05 than vinyl absolutely so thank you
2:08 arendelle so much you guys know i hate
2:10 vinyl finishes i hate seeing them
2:12 especially as a product approaches a
2:13 thousand dollars and
2:15 i know every time i talk about this i
2:16 say a different price amount but you get
2:19 my point i just hate vinyl
2:21 i hate to see it and it's not here and
2:23 you can't even if you if you wanted a
2:25 vinyl finish too bad you can't have one
2:27 with arendelle they don't offer it
2:28 awesome move i want to see this more often
2:30 often
2:31 around back we've also got some really
2:33 nice chassis mounted rcas i love that
2:35 attention to detail there's some small
2:36 like allen keys holding the plate in
2:39 place as well as some torx screws um and
2:40 then we also have a screen and you're
2:41 probably like what's that why do i have
2:42 a screen this thing's not a tv what's
2:45 going on here so that is where you make
2:46 all your adjustments
2:48 um and when i say all your adjustments i
2:51 mean a lot there's a lot as much fine
2:54 grain control as you want it is there
2:55 i'll leave a list on the screen of all
2:57 the things you can adjust for you guys i
2:58 like to just
3:00 get in there with your fine grain options
3:01 options
3:03 i found the knob and button combination
3:05 very easy to use and very intuitive and
3:07 i thought that was great
3:09 um let me see oh another standout
3:10 feature is going to be the kind of
3:12 attention to detail and this is one of
3:14 those things that's like look it doesn't
3:16 affect the sound i understand that but
3:19 it tells me that someone at the company
3:20 most likely the owner
3:23 just cares a lot about the product and
3:24 might be a little ocd which i can
3:27 appreciate on the the feet there's the
3:29 the arendelle logo which i think is a
3:31 nice little touch and then on the
3:34 surround of the driver it has the word
3:36 arendelle stamped onto the surround and
3:38 i just thought that was super cool so
3:40 so
3:43 let's get into some sound impressions oh
3:44 of course by the way there is a magnetic
3:46 grill you could use you know if you want
3:48 to hide the driver so
3:49 sound impressions are going to be
3:51 interesting here guys because what we've
3:53 got going on is a mix of two different camps
3:54 camps
3:56 there's some attributes that might make
3:58 it sound like i'm describing an spl
3:59 style subwoofer but then it's got some
4:00 other attributes that might make it
4:02 sound like i'm describing an sq
4:04 subwoofer and it does a little bit of
4:06 both in this really interesting way what
4:09 do i mean i will explain so
4:12 dynamic attack is very very strong very
4:14 powerful very forceful
4:17 when i review svs subwoofers dynamic
4:19 attack attack is something i talk about
4:21 and i'll usually say something like svs
4:22 subwoofers are second to none when it
4:25 comes to terms of attack their attack is
4:27 so aggressive it's almost violent the
4:28 way it comes on
4:31 until now the arendelle 1961 1s i found
4:33 to be more dynamic more aggressive in
4:35 its initial attack that was very
4:36 impressive to me
4:38 the interesting thing so this is usually
4:41 a characteristic of spl style bass but
4:44 the way it presented this dynamic attack was
4:44 was
4:46 very clean
4:48 so it didn't feel overly
4:50 overly
4:53 boosted or exaggerated
4:55 it didn't give the
4:57 sound and like a thickness that it
4:59 didn't need to have it almost sounded
5:01 like it was supposed to have that much
5:03 bass it almost sounded like like look i
5:05 knew it was more bass than usual right
5:06 because you know i listen to the same
5:08 tracks like a million times but it
5:10 almost sounded like that's how it's
5:11 supposed to be it was a really
5:13 interesting experience so
5:14 because i get this question a lot a lot
5:16 of people ask me like i won't base that
5:18 kicks like a freight train but still
5:20 integrates really well you want that
5:23 blend of sq and spl and this for the
5:25 most part does that so
5:26 i think it's worth looking at for a lot
5:28 of people
5:29 let's talk about some other sound
5:31 characteristics so transient response is
5:32 pretty good
5:34 i found the the driver starts and stops
5:36 when it's supposed to it's not overly
5:38 tight some subwoofers when they start
5:40 and stop it's like very aggressive it
5:41 almost draws attention to itself this
5:43 was more like
5:44 the way it should be um
5:45 um
5:47 speed and articulation were very good
5:49 note to note distinction was very good
5:52 like the difference between say 25 hertz
5:53 and 35 hertz was you know clearly a
5:55 different frequency for example
5:57 the mid bass is something i want to talk
5:58 about usually most subwoofers don't have
6:00 the best mid bass and i try to keep most
6:02 subwoofers below 50 hertz and there's
6:03 nothing wrong with that you know
6:05 subwoofers they're not mid-bass woofers
6:08 they're not really built to produce
6:09 strong tactful mid-bass that's really
6:12 your speaker's job but a lot of us use
6:13 bookshelf speakers that don't have the
6:15 strongest mid-bass so i understand some
6:16 of you guys might want to cross over
6:19 higher than i do i generally try to keep
6:20 it below 50 hertz
6:24 but the arendelle 1961 one s has a very
6:26 clean base region i was able to blend it
6:28 up as high as 60 even 70 hertz and all
6:30 it did is made my speakers sound like
6:31 they were a little bit larger and had
6:32 more mid bass
6:34 usually with other subwoofers when i try
6:35 to crank up that mid bass at some point
6:37 it starts to get a little bit muddy and
6:39 messy that didn't happen here now don't
6:40 get me wrong there are some subwoofers
6:42 that have killer mid bass articulation
6:45 like rel or rhythmic for example now let
6:46 me see if there's any other sound
6:48 impressions i want to talk about
6:50 there was one thing i noticed um with
6:52 the subwoofer in the orientation that
6:54 it's designed to have you know where the
6:56 driver is you know loading the corner of
6:57 the room um
6:58 um
6:59 base was
7:01 you know the lowest octaves it was very
7:03 strong it was very authoritative very
7:04 forceful and had that strong dynamic
7:06 attack i'm talking about for movies that
7:08 was super cool but for music it
7:10 definitely did feel a little bit
7:12 exaggerated at certain frequencies
7:14 certain parts of certain songs i was
7:16 like there's a little too much there and
7:18 a little not enough here and i
7:20 discovered turning the subwoofer so that
7:22 the driver was facing me gave me a more
7:25 natural response for music so if you're
7:26 planning to use something like this in a
7:27 mix system and you like the sound of
7:30 that extra authority and rumble for
7:31 movies when it's in its normal
7:33 orientation but when i listen to music
7:34 every now and then just you know give a
7:37 little turn and it'll give you that more
7:39 natural response or you could just leave
7:41 it in its normal orientation and enjoy
7:43 that kind of like i guess you could say
7:46 slightly exaggerated frequency response
7:49 at you know those lower octaves it's
7:50 you know bass is an interesting thing a
7:52 lot of it does come down to personal
7:54 taste and preference for example i get a
7:56 question like this a lot
7:58 will x y or z subwoofer be enough for my
8:00 room and i usually do my best to answer
8:01 and i usually give some kind of answer
8:03 but i'm always hoping they're not a
8:06 psychopath what do i mean by that so
8:08 let's talk about shane from spare change again
8:09 again
8:11 shane's a good guy i love his content i
8:12 subscribe to his channel and even on his
8:14 patreon but his room is about the same
8:16 size as mine and he has dual 18s that's
8:18 pretty intense for a room this size i
8:20 have another buddy again room similar in
8:23 size to mine dual 18s and dual 15-inch
8:26 subwoofers at the same time that's
8:28 hardcore stuff i have been happy in this
8:30 room with subwoofers as little as eight
8:32 inches so we are all quite different
8:34 with respect to how much bass we want
8:36 it's almost like food if we're eating
8:38 like a bowl of ramen how spicy do you
8:40 want it you know i like my ramen just a
8:42 little bit spicy but i have friends
8:44 they'll try mine and they'll say it's
8:46 totally bland where's the spice where's
8:48 the flavor they're gonna put like a ton
8:49 of sriracha or chili oil in there they
8:52 just like want it to hit so hard
8:54 that's not how i am i like the little
8:56 just baby spice anyhow
8:58 what other sound impressions do we have
9:00 to talk about
9:03 integration very good and this surprised
9:04 me and i'll tell you why the reason
9:07 integration surprised me is because
9:09 when a when a subwoofer has really
9:12 strong dynamic attack i expect it to not
9:14 integrate very well because strong
9:16 dynamic attack generally draws attention
9:18 to itself it usually makes a subwoofer
9:19 localized a little bit and makes the bass
9:20 bass
9:22 you know it's clearly coming from the
9:24 subwoofer but i found that to not be the
9:26 case with this because the presentation
9:28 was very clean overall the bass was you
9:29 know instead of coming from the
9:30 subwoofer it was coming just from the
9:32 front stage overall it wasn't coming
9:34 like from the background like you would
9:35 see in like a rel or rhythmic for
9:37 example but it was coming from the front
9:39 stage the bass never really localized
9:40 for me
9:44 um in any way or or uh didn't integrate
9:46 it just it integrated just fine honestly
9:48 that yeah took me by surprise for the
9:54 yeah that's it for sound impressions
9:55 guys let's jump into some comparisons
9:57 and then we'll wrap it up so comparisons
9:58 let's talk about this compared to what i
10:00 think its most direct competitor is
10:03 going to be the svs sb2000 pro
10:05 the svs sb2000 pro has tons of dynamic
10:07 attack it's very good at that this has
10:09 just a little bit more this has a ton of
10:11 features the svs sb2000 pro has a ton of
10:13 features the svs you can adjust those
10:15 features from the cell phone app that
10:17 does come with that subwoofer
10:19 the fit and finish of both is very good
10:20 i would say that arendelle takes the
10:23 edge a little bit
10:25 let's see what else
10:26 the arendelle is going to have a little
10:28 bit cleaner mid base and a little bit
10:31 cleaner presentation overall
10:33 the svs sb2000 pro is very quick with
10:34 this transients it's going to have
10:37 slightly harder start and stops the
10:39 arendelle 19611s is going to be a little
10:42 bit softer or natural where this starts
10:44 and stops and this isn't a situation of
10:45 one being better this is a situation
10:47 which you prefer
10:48 basically what i'm saying is the svs
10:50 sb2000 project has a slightly tighter
10:53 sound and the arendelle 1961 1s has a
10:55 slightly deeper sound so that pretty
10:56 much wraps up that comparison both are
10:58 fantastic subwoofers
10:59 let's move on and talk about the
11:01 rhythmic f12 i understand sometimes you
11:03 guys don't like me using rhythmic as an
11:04 example because it's not available
11:05 everywhere and if it is in other
11:06 countries sometimes you have to pay
11:09 extra freight shipping and i'm sorry but
11:11 it is what it is in the us we don't ever
11:12 really have to pay extra freight
11:15 shipping but we have a hidden cost
11:17 instead of extra freight shipping our
11:18 retail price is just higher on a lot of
11:21 products so we all pay extra one way or
11:22 another when the product we're buying
11:25 wasn't made in our home country so don't
11:26 feel like you're the only one getting
11:28 robbed here some of you guys get robbed
11:30 pretty hard with import taxes and duties
11:32 i'm sorry that's terrible um but let's
11:34 not get into politics say so
11:37 rhythmic f12 uh and arendelle 1961 both
11:39 are sealed 12 inch drivers
11:42 the rhythmic f12 sc is going to be class
11:44 a b powered 370 watts aarondell is going
11:47 to be class d powered 550 watts
11:48 both are going to have a ton of features
11:50 but the way they let you adjust those
11:52 features are very different arendelle
11:54 1961 1s gives you that nice screen on
11:56 the back with that button and knob
11:57 combination to make your adjustments
11:59 because it's all through dsp
12:01 rhythmic takes a totally analog approach
12:02 you've got a tons of ton of knobs and
12:05 switches to make those adjustments
12:07 i would not say there's a benefit of one
12:09 over the other personally i like knobs
12:10 and switches so i like really like
12:12 messing with them like really tactile
12:14 but again the air intel was very
12:15 intuitive and easy to use and easy to
12:16 set up
12:18 i didn't find any difference in ease of
12:20 setup for either unit uh because both
12:22 had a ton of options and i was able to
12:24 get them both set up very easily
12:25 the difference for these two is really
12:27 going to come down to that dynamics the
12:29 way they present that rhythmic with its
12:30 servo technology they're going to be
12:32 shooting for the accurate and correct
12:34 amount of dynamic attack
12:37 the irondale 1961 1s on the other hand
12:38 is going to be totally the opposite it
12:41 doesn't care what the correct amount of
12:43 dynamic attack is it's going to give you
12:45 a lot of it it's going to be forceful
12:48 and it's just going to hit like a train
12:49 so i would say this is going to depend
12:51 on kind of like what you want do you
12:53 want the amount of bass to be exactly
12:55 accurate and correct per the signal the
12:57 subwoofer is receiving you might prefer
12:59 the sound of the rhythmic
13:01 if you want accuracy but you know what
13:03 you like your dynamics to be big even if
13:05 it's not the way it's necessarily
13:07 supposed to be per the signal you know
13:08 what i mean
13:09 but it hits
13:12 you may like the errondell 1961-1s and
13:13 again this is a situation where one is
13:15 not better than the other the rhythmic
13:17 isn't better for being accurate
13:19 and the 1961-1s isn't better for being
13:21 more dynamic
13:24 it's a choice of which one do you like
13:26 how spicy do you want your food it's
13:28 personal spicy food isn't better than
13:29 non-spicy food right no one would ever
13:31 say that
13:33 but if you like spicy food you will say
13:36 spicy food is better than non-spicy food
13:37 and vice versa if you don't like spicy
13:39 food honestly guys i have a friend who
13:42 considers pepper spicy black pepper is
13:44 spicy to this man he will definitely
13:46 tell you non-spicy food is better than
13:49 spicy food but that is not usually how
13:50 it works in the real world when we're
13:53 speaking generally about products
13:55 the choice of taste
13:57 preference and options and you have to
13:58 find the one that is going to be in line
14:00 with what you're looking for what
14:03 matters to you let me think of some
14:04 other differences uh the rhythmic is
14:06 going to give us a lot nicer of a finish
14:08 it's a nice piano gloss it is a little
14:11 bit more expensive however
14:13 both have very good attention to detail
14:14 both are built very very well the
14:16 rhythmic i would say is
14:18 a little bit heavier its cabinet is
14:19 going to be a little bit more robust and
14:21 things like that but both are fantastic
14:24 subwoofers just on opposite sides of the
14:26 uh dynamic spectrum and with respect to
14:28 attack the rhythmic has better mid bass
14:30 the aaron does no slots in that category
14:31 but rhythmic is one of the best
14:33 subwoofers to buy if you're obsessed
14:35 with that kind of like 5200 hertz mid
14:37 bass both extend plenty low and play
14:39 extend i'm sorry and play plenty loud i
14:40 don't know which one extends lower or
14:42 plays louder i don't do those like
14:44 maximum kinds of tests most of my
14:45 testing is going to be done with music right
14:46 right so
14:47 so
14:50 let's jump up or around and talk about
14:52 this compared to the subwoofer i always
14:55 sit on the rel ht 1205. so the rail hd
14:58 12 is a 1205 is an awesome subwoofer i
14:59 own one it's one of my personal
15:01 subwoofers as is you know the rhythmic i
15:02 mentioned by the way um
15:04 um
15:06 these are quite different
15:08 again with respect to feature set where
15:11 the arendelle 1961-1s gives us a ton of
15:13 fine grain options and controls
15:16 rel on the other hand is like no
15:17 they believe a subwoofer should be as
15:19 easy as possible to set up
15:21 the less the consumer has to fiddle
15:24 around with the better and
15:26 at first you might think if there's less
15:28 to adjust you probably won't get it to
15:30 integrate as well that's not true rel
15:32 has been able to make a subwoofer in the
15:34 ht-1205 with just three things to adjust phase
15:36 phase
15:38 and you want you just zero 180 you just
15:39 pick one gain
15:41 gain
15:42 and crossover frequency and crossover
15:44 frequency they generally recommend nine
15:46 o'clock so it's really easy to set up
15:48 you only get those three options and it
15:49 integrates very well both integrate very
15:51 well honestly thrill takes the edge in
15:53 terms of integration as far as the
15:55 performance overall both are dynam both
15:58 are dynamic the 1961-1s is going to be
15:59 the more dynamic as i said at the
16:01 beginning of this video it is one of the
16:03 most uh aggressive subwoofers i've heard
16:05 with respect to its dynamic attack the
16:07 rel is going to play tighter and
16:10 surprisingly a little bit cleaner
16:13 the 1961 one s is going to have overall
16:16 just a more forceful presentation that
16:18 is going to focus more on deep bass as
16:19 opposed to the rel focusing more on
16:21 tight bass quickness and transient
16:23 response and speed
16:25 both are pretty good again this is a
16:26 scenario where one is not better than
16:28 the other and it's more a choice of
16:30 flavor do you prefer the deep base of
16:33 the 1961-1s or the type base of the rel
16:36 ht1205 do you prefer the narrow front
16:38 baffle of the 1961-1s with its
16:40 side-firing driver or do you prefer the
16:42 more traditional front-firing 12-inch
16:44 driver of the rel ht-1205 you guys dig
16:46 what i'm saying here this
16:48 today is such a good day to be an
16:50 audiophile and
16:53 or be in the market for a subwoofer
16:55 most subwoofers are really good i've
16:57 reviewed a lot of subwoofers now and
16:59 guys they're all really good there's
17:01 only been one subwoofer i really like
17:03 gave it to because it was no good that
17:04 was that uh
17:06 that velodyne
17:09 that was a db12 it was terrible
17:11 total ripoff for the money it was no
17:13 good at a crappy cabinet hardly had any
17:15 power i'll be honest i'm not even so
17:16 sure that thing had a class a b
17:19 amplifier that they claimed it had
17:21 outside of that review i did every other
17:23 subwoofer i've reviewed over the past
17:26 year has been a good subwoofer
17:28 it's an amazing time
17:31 and what you need to look for is not
17:34 which unit is better than which unit
17:36 because they're all so good now don't
17:38 get me wrong if we like if i compare
17:39 this to something like two thousand
17:41 dollars the two thousand dollar item's
17:43 probably going to be better like
17:45 this thing's own big brother the 1723
17:48 that's 1500 bucks is better so once we
17:49 start to like incorporate a big price
17:50 difference of course there is such a
17:52 thing as better
17:54 but when they're around the same price
17:56 generally like they're all really good
17:59 especially in this like around 1 000
18:00 category this one's 900 bucks so it's
18:03 just under but i consider that in the
18:06 around one thousand dollar category
18:09 so try to if you can
18:12 understand what it is about base you like
18:13 like
18:15 do you like strong powerful bass that
18:16 might draw attention to itself
18:18 do you like clean tidy bass that doesn't
18:20 draw attention to itself do you care
18:23 about dynamics or speed and transients
18:25 do you care about mid bass do you care
18:26 about low frequency extension it's
18:28 unlikely you care about all of these
18:30 things let me give you myself as an example
18:32 example
18:33 transient speed as much as i talk about
18:36 it not so important to me and i know
18:37 some of you guys are probably can't
18:38 believe what i'm saying because a lot of
18:40 you guys know i love rel subwoofers
18:42 sometimes you guys call me a rel fanboy
18:44 which is not true
18:45 and you guys might think it's because
18:46 they're so quick
18:48 but no i don't care so much about
18:50 transient response for the longest time
18:52 i used a ported subwoofer in my car only
18:53 recently that i switched to a sealed
18:54 subwoofer and that was in an effort to
18:56 save space i don't mind overhanging if
18:58 i'm being completely honest
19:00 what i care about when it comes to a
19:01 subwoofer are a few things
19:03 i care about it's low frequency extension
19:04 extension
19:06 and i like it being forceful around 25
19:08 hertz even if it's boosted i don't care
19:10 so much about accuracy in that last
19:12 final octave i'd like it to be a little
19:14 bit exaggerated honestly give me a
19:17 little bit of extra spice at 25 hertz if
19:19 you can
19:21 i like a clean mid bass even though i'm
19:23 unlikely to use it most of the time i do
19:28 dynamics are important to me but
19:30 but
19:32 not that much like if a subwoofer is
19:33 like crazy dynamic i'm like oh that's
19:36 cool if it's a little dynamic and like
19:38 not the most dynamic i'm like that's
19:41 cool too i do care about texture however
19:44 texture i care about more than dynamics
19:46 texture i care about more than transient
19:49 response or speed
19:52 texture is when that bass note hits the
19:54 layers that you hear within that sound
19:56 field and it's not something i talk
19:57 about a whole lot in videos because it
20:00 gets kind of like
20:02 too much we started to split hairs at
20:05 some point too much you know
20:08 but i care about texture a lot um
20:09 um
20:10 i'm gonna say
20:12 it's really just those two things that
20:13 are the most important thing to me the
20:15 speed has to be good enough
20:17 the transient response has to be good
20:19 enough the dynamics has to be good
20:22 enough but the low frequency extension
20:24 and authority has to be really good it
20:26 has to be really good and the texture
20:28 has to be really good those are the
20:29 things that like really are at the top
20:32 of my list and i think if you guys try
20:34 to kind of make a list for yourself
20:36 you'll find something similar you'll
20:39 want all of the areas to be pretty good
20:40 but there should only be like one or two
20:43 things that like you really really want
20:45 out of a subwoofer
20:47 sometimes i hear people say like i want
20:48 this because it has the cell phone out
20:50 but like this one i want to but it
20:51 doesn't have the cell phone app that's
20:54 an accessory guys keep in mind these
20:56 cell phone apps are super cool i love to
20:58 see them but once you set up the subwoofer
20:59 subwoofer
21:01 most people aren't going to really use
21:02 it too much
21:04 if you're fiddling around with the cell
21:06 phone app constantly
21:07 outside of switching from like a music
21:10 mode to like a movie mode
21:11 you might i don't know you might might
21:13 be a little ocd you know what i'm saying
21:16 anyway i digress look we're about
21:17 approaching the end of this video um
21:19 i'll wrap it up with this guys we've got
21:21 a good subwoofer here it's got a good a
21:24 blend of characteristics of spl and sq
21:26 and i think it's a sound a lot of people
21:28 are going to like but then again all the
21:29 subwoofers i mentioned are really good
21:32 in one way or another so
21:33 good time to be alive
21:35 aarondell is awesome 60 day in home
21:37 trial 5 year warranty 900 bucks
21:41 delivered to your door paint only finish
21:42 sounds like a pretty good deal if you
21:44 ask me if you have any questions ask
21:45 them about them ask about them in the
21:47 comments below and for those of you that
21:48 want to hear my impressions about how
21:51 this compares to the 17231s model you
21:53 will have to wait for me to review that
21:55 subwoofer in that video i will make the
21:57 comparison i haven't reviewed it yet so
21:59 i can't really tell you the
22:01 comparison i'll give you a little teaser
22:03 a little sneak peek if you will the 17231s
22:10 its attack is more accurate and its
22:13 presentation more
22:15 high end if you will i'll leave you with
22:18 that we'll talk about more uh
22:20 you know differences when we get to that
22:22 review okay
22:23 like i said if you have any questions
22:24 ask about them in the comments below
22:26 guys thank you for tuning in until next
