0:02 11 scientists dead,
0:05 missing, or vanished without a trace.
0:07 What started as isolated tragedies is
0:09 now forming a pattern that is impossible
0:12 to ignore. I went case by case and the
0:14 similarities are chilling. These aren't
0:16 random names. These are high-level
0:18 experts tied to national security,
0:20 defense research, and space programs.
0:22 And here's where it gets even darker.
0:23 Some of them said they were being
0:28 threatened before they died. Like
0:29 I'm scared. >> [laughter]
0:33 >> I'm tired.
0:35 I'm real tired because it's like
0:37 escalating. It's getting more and more
0:39 aggressive. That's not speculation.
0:43 That's fear, real fear, on record. And
0:46 then this. I have some indication that
0:49 he must have planned not to be found. A
0:52 missing general, a chilling 911 call,
0:54 and a growing list of brilliant minds
0:58 gone. Look at this. 11 scientists, every
0:59 one of them connected to sensitive work,
1:01 defense, aerospace, advanced research.
1:04 The timeline stretches back to 2023.
1:07 The locations, mostly clustered. Four in
1:09 New Mexico, four in California, and a
1:11 few random cases on the East Coast. But
1:13 here's the part no one can explain.
1:17 Every single case remains unsolved. This
1:18 doesn't start with headlines. It starts
1:22 quietly. One name, one incident, easy to
1:26 dismiss until it isn't. Michael David
1:28 Hicks, a NASA-linked scientist at the
1:31 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, dead in 2023,
1:34 age 59. Cause of death? Not publicly
1:37 released. Then, just a year later, Frank
1:41 Meeuwsen, same institution, same field,
1:45 dead at 61. Again, no details. At this
1:47 point, no one connects the dots. But
1:50 then 2025 changes the pattern. A
1:53 physicist at the Massachusetts Institute
1:55 of Technology, Nuno Loureiro, is shot
1:57 dead. You probably remember the story.
1:59 He was the MIT professor killed by the
2:01 Brown University mass shooter last
2:04 December. Police say he opened fire in
2:07 an auditorium on the Ivy League campus.
2:09 Officials say he's also responsible for
2:11 gunning down a prominent MIT physics
2:14 professor. He was murdered inside of his
2:16 Boston home two days after the Brown
2:18 shooting. Police say they were former
2:21 classmates in Portugal. And now the big
2:23 question is why? And then there's the
2:26 case that takes us from unsettling to
2:29 outright disturbing. Carl Grillmair, an
2:31 astronomer tied to Caltech. He was shot
2:32 and killed on the front porch of his
2:34 home this past February. But here's what
2:37 makes this different. This is the house.
2:40 Remote, isolated, definitely not
2:42 suburban. He chose that location
2:44 deliberately for the darkness, for his
2:46 personal observatory. Which raises a
2:48 simple question, who goes all the way
2:50 out there and why? Police say the
2:53 suspect, 29-year-old Freddy Snyder,
2:54 lived two miles away and had a history
2:57 of trespassing on Grillmair's property.
2:59 This wasn't random. In fact, months
3:02 before the killing, Grillmair called
3:03 authorities to report someone on his
3:06 land. Deputies responded and they found
3:08 Snyder nearby carrying a loaded
3:11 unregistered rifle. His explanation? He
3:13 was walking to the post office. There's
3:16 just one problem. The post office was in
3:18 the opposite direction of his home.
3:20 Now, the accused killer was supposed to
3:22 face a judge in March. That hearing has
3:25 been delayed to April. So far, no new
3:28 news. Now, it's not just unexplained or
3:30 natural deaths. At the very same time,
3:33 people started disappearing. In New
3:34 Mexico alone, four scientists are now
3:36 missing. Three of them tied to one
3:39 place, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
3:41 And the most recent case may be the most
3:44 baffling of all. Retired General William
3:46 Neil McCaslin, former commander of the
3:48 Air Force Research Laboratory, a senior
3:51 Pentagon official. He vanishes in less
3:55 than an hour. On February 27th, midday,
3:57 he's at home, his wife sees him, a
3:59 repairman sees him, everything is
4:01 normal. His wife leaves for a doctor's
4:04 appointment just after 11:00 and returns
4:07 back home at 12:04 to be exact. Upon her
4:10 arrival, she notices her husband is
4:12 gone. No signs of struggle, no forced
4:15 entry. But guess what? He leaves behind
4:18 his phone, his smartwatch, even his
4:20 prescription glasses. But what's
4:23 missing? His wallet, his hiking boots,
4:26 and a .38 caliber revolver. So, what
4:28 does that tell you? Who walks out on
4:30 foot in the middle of the day without
4:33 their glasses but takes a gun?
4:35 His wife called 911 hours later. Listen
4:37 closely. This is April, how may I help
4:39 you? Hi April, my name is Susan
4:42 Wilkerson. Um my husband is missing. Okay.
4:43 Okay.
4:47 >> Uh and he's it's been about 3 hours and
4:50 I have some indication that he must have
4:53 planned not to be found. He's left his
4:55 phone, he's changed his clothes and I
4:57 don't know what. I think he's on foot.
5:00 All of our cars and bicycles are in the
5:02 garage. Since that call, there hasn't
5:04 been a single trace of him. No activity,
5:07 no sightings, nothing. It's as if he
5:09 vanished into thin air. And that's not
5:11 all. Weeks later, his wife posted this
5:13 on Facebook. Quote, "It is true that
5:15 when Neil was in the Air Force, he had
5:16 access to some highly classified
5:19 programs and information. He retired
5:21 from the AF almost 13 years ago and has
5:23 had only very commonly held clearances
5:25 since. It seems quite unlikely that he
5:27 was taken to extract very dated secrets
5:30 from him. Neil does not have any special
5:32 knowledge about the ET bodies and debris
5:33 from the Roswell crash stored at
5:35 Wright-Patt. Though at this point, with
5:37 absolutely no sign of him, maybe the
5:39 best hypothesis is that aliens beamed
5:41 him up to the mothership. However, no
5:43 sightings of a mothership hovering above
5:45 the Sandia Mountains have been
5:47 reported." Now, on the surface, that
5:49 sounds like dark humor. But it doesn't
5:51 come out of nowhere. Because take a look
5:53 at this. In 2016,
5:57 WikiLeaks emails showed McCaslin
5:59 described in an email to Hillary Clinton
6:02 campaign chair, John Podesta. Who is the
6:06 email from? Blink-182 singer and founder
6:09 of To the Stars, Tom DeLonge. The email
6:12 suggested McCaslin had a role in some of
6:13 the government's most sensitive work
6:15 related to unidentified aerial
6:19 phenomenon or UAPs. He was described by
6:22 Blink-182's Tom DeLonge as a quote,
6:25 "very important man." A very important
6:28 man tied to highly sensitive programs
6:30 and now gone without a trace. But here's
6:32 where the story gets even more
6:34 unsettling. He's not the only one. Two
6:36 other individuals connected to Los
6:38 Alamos have also disappeared. Anthony
6:40 Chavez, who answered to General
6:44 McCaslin, vanishes on May 8th, 2025. 79
6:46 years old. A senior figure tied to a
6:48 site critical for nuclear research known
6:51 as DART. And the details? Eerily
6:54 familiar. He leaves home on foot. His
6:57 keys left behind. His phone also left
6:59 behind. His wallet, cigarettes,
7:02 everything. And no car, no bike, no
7:05 trace. Search teams brought in cadaver
7:08 dogs and still nothing was found.
7:10 Then, just 7 weeks later, another
7:13 disappearance. Melissa Casillas, 53
7:15 years old, a wife, a mother, and a Los
7:17 Alamos employee. Her family says
7:19 Casillas is an administrative assistant
7:22 with Los Alamos National Laboratory and
7:24 had went to work that day. They say she
7:26 forgot her badge, which she needs for
7:28 security clearance, and decided to work
7:30 from home. Her family says Casillas
7:31 later took lunch to her daughter at the
7:34 John Dunn Shops and Towns and left the
7:37 shops just before 1:00 p.m. She got back
7:38 in her car, she left. We have
7:40 surveillance footage that shows what she
7:42 was seen last wearing. Alarms were
7:44 raised when Casillas' daughter returned
7:46 home after work and found all of her
7:48 mother's belongings, but Melissa was not
7:51 there. Her purse, her car, her keys, her
7:54 wallet, and her personal phone, her work
7:55 phone, and her computer were all at
7:57 home. And then the details in the
7:59 Casillas case take a sharp turn. She
8:00 reportedly had two cell phones, one
8:02 personal, one work-related. And
8:04 investigators found both had been
8:06 factory reset prior to her
8:09 disappearance. Wiped completely clean.
8:11 That's not normal and it's not an
8:13 accident. Then comes the surveillance
8:15 trail. Casillas is seen on camera at
8:18 approximately 2:18 p.m. walking
8:21 eastbound along Highway 518. A passing
8:23 driver notices her alone on foot in the
8:26 heat and turns around out of concern.
8:28 But by the time they circle back, she's
8:31 gone. And again, not a trace left
8:33 behind. And then, a few months later,
8:35 another name. Steven Garcia, a
8:37 48-year-old who built nuclear parts for
8:40 the Air Force Research Lab. And he helps
8:42 supply 80% of the non-nuclear components
8:44 for nuclear weapons at all nuclear
8:47 sites. Well, he goes missing. Garcia,
8:49 again, leaves home on foot and leaves
8:52 behind his wallet, keys, and car, but
8:54 takes a handgun. This is the last known
8:56 image of him walking with a water in
8:58 hand. And what stands out is the
9:00 consistency in these cases. People
9:02 leaving behind identification,
9:04 transportation, even basic personal
9:06 effects, while taking almost nothing
9:08 that would help them be tracked. It
9:10 raises a difficult question here. What
9:12 would cause multiple individuals in
9:14 related defense and research circles to
9:18 vanish under such similar circumstances?
9:20 Now, shift back to California. Monica
9:22 Reza, 60 years old, a NASA aerospace
9:24 engineer tied to materials research
9:28 projects overseen in part by McCaslin.
9:30 She's last seen hiking in a national
9:33 forest near Mount Waterman on June 22nd,
9:36 2025. Here's what's weird, though. She
9:38 was hiking with a couple of friends. One
9:39 stopped a few miles in and headed back
9:42 to the car. The other friend was walking
9:44 about 30 feet ahead of her. That person
9:47 turned around and waved at Monica, but
9:49 the next time they turned to check on
9:52 her, she was gone. There was a very
9:53 high-tech search for her immediately
9:56 following and it went on for weeks, and
9:58 yet nothing.
10:00 Jason Thomas, head of the chemical
10:03 biology team, he disappears on December
10:06 12th, 2025. No explanation at the time,
10:08 no immediate resolution. 3 months later,
10:10 his body is recovered from a lake in
10:13 Massachusetts after the ice thaws.
10:15 Another case, another unanswered gap in
10:17 the timeline.
10:19 That brings me to Amy Eschridge. She was
10:21 34 years old and based in Huntsville,
10:23 Alabama. She was involved in research
10:25 discussions around advanced propulsion
10:27 concepts including anti-gravity theory
10:30 and extraterrestrial life. In 2022, she
10:32 was found dead at her home from a
10:34 self-inflicted gunshot wound according
10:36 to official reporting. But before her
10:38 death, she had launched a company called
10:40 the Institute for Exotic Science
10:42 describing it as a way to create a
10:45 public-facing platform to disclose
10:47 anti-gravity technology because she
10:49 said, if she did it privately, quote,
10:51 they would bury her and it would never
10:53 make the news.
10:54 Eschridge started sounding the alarm
10:56 bells back in 2020 when she revealed in
10:58 an interview that she had plans to
11:00 disclose information about UFOs and
11:02 extraterrestrials to the public and was
11:05 receiving threats as a result of this.
11:06 She said, quote, I need to disclose
11:08 soon, man. I need to publish soon
11:10 because it's like escalating. It's
11:12 getting more and more aggressive. My
11:14 ex-boyfriend and I realized that people
11:16 had been breaking into our apartment and
11:17 I'm like, why don't you take out the trash
11:19 trash
11:21 and scope out the parking lot
11:23 and make sure it's okay before I go to work.
11:24 work.
11:26 So he goes out there and he's like, it's
11:28 like a silver Lexus and it has tinted
11:30 windows that are not street legal.
11:34 Within 2 minutes, an Eastern European looking
11:35 looking
11:38 with a black beanie dressed all in black
11:41 in his 50s or 60s walked out of the
11:43 apartment directly across from ours
11:46 holding a license plate.
11:48 And he opened the trunk of the Lexus and
11:50 he took out some tools
11:53 and he changed the license plate.
11:54 Due to things escalating, Eschridge
11:56 contacted retired British intelligence
11:58 officer Frank Milburn to help
12:00 investigate the incidents. In fact, she
12:02 spoke to Milburn just hours before she
12:04 died. I don't believe that she killed
12:06 herself. I I just can't because I spoke
12:08 to her 4 hours before and she told me
12:09 time and time again, I'm not going to
12:12 commit suicide. I am not going to have
12:13 an accident. If
12:14 if there's something suspicious about my
12:16 death, it's because it is. Both
12:18 Eschridge and Milburn documented
12:20 multiple occasions where she believed
12:22 she had been subjected to physical and
12:24 psychological attacks including an
12:26 unknown suspect firing a directed energy
12:29 weapon at her causing burns across her
12:31 body using powerful microwaves. Sounds
12:33 bizarre, I know.
12:35 But look at this. A text message
12:37 exchange, Eschridge writes, quote, looks
12:40 like red gloves. I'm so peed off. The
12:42 response reads, quote, I would be mad,
12:44 too. Someone should be protecting you.
12:47 And Eschridge writes back, quote, burns
12:49 line up perfectly with the edge of the
12:51 table as I was typing. Getting hit
12:53 repeatedly with military-grade sci-fi
12:55 weapons is pretty tiresome after a
12:58 while. Frank Milburn gathered all of his
13:00 and Eschridge's findings and submitted
13:01 them to Congress by independent
13:04 investigators in 2023. Milburn said on a
13:06 radio show, quote, somebody was after
13:08 her work. It was either one of two
13:09 objectives. One, trying to get her to
13:12 desist from doing the work, or two, with
13:14 these attacks, with the harassment and
13:16 the directed energy weapon attacks, to
13:19 actually stop her, to debilitate her, so
13:21 she was unable to do the work.
13:23 So what was she working on that was so
13:25 concerning? Well, here's a taste of some
13:28 of the things she had her hands on. So
13:30 the ultraterrestrials, I'll just tell you.
13:31 you.
13:34 The ultraterrestrials, I think
13:36 have you heard of the P-52s and the P-47s?
13:38 P-47s?
13:45 They're us from the future.
13:48 They're from here. They are you. They
13:50 are me. They're from here, from the future.
13:52 future. P-47
13:54 P-47
13:59 is present plus 47,000 years. P-52
14:00 P-52
14:02 is present
14:05 plus 52,000 years.
14:07 And basically there's a calamity.
14:09 Right? So there's like a apocalypse
14:12 scenario in the near future.
14:14 It wipes out most of like everything, man.
14:16 man.
14:19 And there's the ones that go underground
14:21 and survive, right?
14:23 And then there's the ones that somehow
14:26 stay on the surface and miraculously
14:27 don't die.
14:29 Fair warning, her work takes you down a
14:30 massive rabbit hole. Now, she is
14:33 referencing a project called the Looking
14:34 Glass project which suggests
14:36 hypothetical models predicting
14:39 large-scale future catastrophic events
14:41 as a way of explaining geopolitical
14:43 control systems. The fact that the
14:46 P-45s, that's how moral these people
14:48 are. The fact that the P-45s are are are
14:50 wanting us
14:51 to at their stage in their own development
14:53 development
14:55 have a disaster which which justifies
14:58 their own history.
15:00 Is being used as a means to an end by
15:01 the Illuminati who would like to see
15:04 that the population is culled so that
15:06 they can gain greater control.
15:08 That interview is a lot to take in and
15:09 it goes on for about an hour. Some of it
15:11 sits firmly in the realm of theory and
15:14 interpretation and it's left many people
15:16 with more questions than answers, which
15:17 brings me back to comments from
15:19 Congressman Tim Burchett about what he
15:22 says he has seen and been told regarding
15:26 unidentified phenomena. You have said,
15:29 quote, you would be up all night if the
15:33 things that I've seen are released. What
15:35 are you talking about? I've seen
15:39 pictures and video of things
15:41 that defy any reason that we have and
15:43 everybody says, well, it's our stuff,
15:46 it's the Russians, it's the Chinese. The
15:48 Chinese, ma'am, they would own us. If it
15:49 was the Russians, they wouldn't be
15:51 bogged down in Ukraine. If it was ours,
15:54 we would never risk our military
15:57 fighting man and women in half a
15:59 billion-dollar aircraft out with these
16:01 things and that they're spotting. These
16:04 things can hover for hours on end and
16:06 then they can just shoot straight up.
16:08 They can do angles. Um
16:10 had an admiral sitting right here in my
16:13 office telling me about a a craft they
16:16 saw almost big as a football field on on
16:18 sonar under the Well, they didn't see it
16:20 was on sonar. It was traveling over 200
16:23 miles an hour underwater. There's no We
16:24 don't have anything with that capability
16:26 or that size.
16:27 Pressure to release those files has
16:29 increased and there are now ongoing
16:31 talks surrounding the idea of making
16:33 this information public. Now, as for the
16:35 mystery surrounding the 11 scientists,
16:37 House Oversight Committee Chair James
16:39 Comer sent letters to the FBI, Energy
16:41 Department, NASA, and Department of War
16:43 asking for any information that they
16:45 might have. Well, it does appear that
16:46 there's a
16:49 high possibility that something sinister
16:51 is taking place here. It it's very
16:53 unlikely that this is a coincidence. So
16:55 Congress is very concerned about this.
16:57 Our committee is is making this one of
17:00 our priorities now because we view this
17:02 as a national security threat. NASA's
17:04 pushing back on the speculation and
17:06 released a statement saying, quote, at
17:08 this time, nothing related to NASA
17:10 indicates a national security threat.
17:11 Now, the agency says they're committed
17:13 to transparency and will provide more
17:15 information as they're able.
17:18 So what's not in the dispute is this.
17:19 Several of the individuals at the center
17:22 of these cases had ties, direct or
17:24 indirect, to NASA's Jet Propulsion
17:25 Laboratory and other sensitive
17:28 information. The White House and FBI say
17:29 they're now looking into these cases.
17:31 They're investigating as pressure builds
17:33 for clear answers and greater
17:36 transparency around what, if anything,
17:39 connects the cases.
17:40 We'll continue to follow and see where
17:42 this leads. Hopefully, we get some
17:44 answers. That does it for me today.
17:45 [music] If you missed yesterday's video,
17:46 it's up on your screen now. You can
17:48 check it out. For the rest of you,
17:49 thanks for watching today. Have a great
17:51 rest of your day and I hope you sleep
