0:03 And I think in a way for a country like
0:05 Britain that it that whose whose future
0:08 has got to be as a as a global as a
0:11 nation of global citizens not just
0:13 British citizens then
0:15 then
0:17 I think you know interfaith in this
0:19 context is incredibly important because
0:21 you cannot be a global citizen be
0:23 religiously illiterate.
0:26 >> Big tone there laying out his dream of
0:29 the global citizen. I think we all know
0:32 at this point that our individual
0:35 identity, our unity was sacrificed on
0:37 the altar of Blair's globalist liberal
0:40 dream. But it's interesting to look back
0:44 now and ask, was Blair's dream achieved?
0:46 When we look around the Western world, I
0:49 think we can see European peoples
0:51 starting to realize they're losing
0:53 something very, very important,
0:56 something sacred, and scrambling to save
0:58 what they can. But the hour is late,
1:02 perhaps too late. There are also many
1:03 different people here from all around
1:06 the world. And not to mention, ideology
1:08 is rife amongst the Europeans
1:11 themselves. It's not exactly like we
1:13 have one unified voice. In fact, those
1:15 of us who even try to give us one
1:17 unified voice will be actively seen as
1:21 pure evil by the other half. So in some
1:24 senses I think you can say Blair really
1:26 went for his dream but it hasn't come
1:28 into fruition
1:30 because his dream itself was rooted in a
1:33 misunderstanding of how reality works.
1:35 So what we're left with is a very
1:37 fragmented west. Of course that's not
1:40 all down to Blair, but he was one of the
1:43 leading figures of it. And this leads me
1:45 to something I didn't say in yesterday's
1:47 video about why the Greens are having
1:49 some success. There are many reasons for
1:53 it, but one of the things uh I didn't
1:56 touch on is they are capable of
2:00 fostering a unifying message in modern
2:03 multicultural Britain where the global
2:05 citizen is supposed to reign. As much as
2:08 they say they're against the neoliberal
2:10 mainstream represented by Blair, in many
2:13 ways they feed off it. And while again I
2:16 would agree with uh the Green uh
2:18 disagree with the Green Party, sorry, in
2:19 terms of their worldview and think it
2:22 will lead to a disaster, they can speak
2:25 to differing factions and and give them
2:27 a message of well it's all us versus the
2:29 billionaires. They're the ones that have
2:31 created this racism. Of course, they'll
2:33 be eaten alive by their own Islam
2:35 communism in the end, but they can have
2:38 that message. And this really tells us,
2:40 I think we're at a massive point in
2:43 history that we often overlook. And it's
2:46 worth doing a video of exposition, if
2:48 you like, to just review where we're at
2:51 because it is a very, very big moment in
2:54 history. What comes next will be uh
2:57 potentially century defining. And I
2:58 think there are four big things uh at
3:00 least the way I see it. Feel free to add
3:03 others in the comments. The first one is
3:06 we are now at the passing of the boomers
3:08 stage of history. They're still holding
3:10 on. You know, Paul McCartney is still
3:13 playing a gig somewhere. Bob Dylan, too.
3:14 You know, I'm sure they're still
3:16 traveling around and reliving the 60s
3:19 and the ideology that comes with it. But
3:21 their worldview is fading. We are seeing
3:24 it start to fall away. Um, yeah, the
3:26 embers is still burning and you can
3:28 probably still get elected on a sort of
3:30 boomer liberal/ libertarian ticket if
3:32 you're more right-leaning, but it it is
3:35 falling apart and with it the liberal
3:38 individualist dream. I've spoken about
3:40 this before uh with regards to the
3:42 right-wing quote unquote. you know, the
3:45 um the the boomerite will be very much
3:48 um Thatcherite uh libertarianism,
3:50 individualism, private property, uh
3:54 small state, um markets, you know the
3:57 drill. And the younger right uh are much
4:01 more nationalist in in in flavor. Uh
4:03 they almost see individualism as a
4:05 problem now. And I would say rightly so.
4:08 They've realized that only the Europeans
4:11 seem to embrace this uh post-racial,
4:13 post-ethnth, postcultural mentality
4:15 which is all about money and
4:17 individualism. The other groups have
4:20 maintained their uh identity and who can
4:22 blame them for that. Uh it's only us
4:24 that have have sacrificed them and had
4:27 to sacrifice them um on the altar of of
4:30 Blair's dream really. So, as I say, we
4:33 can see that this is is is coming to an
4:36 end. And if you don't have some form of
4:38 group identity or or tribe in the world,
4:39 you you will just be swallowed by the
4:42 next power structure. And if we're still
4:44 living in the well, you can't blame
4:45 boomers that they will live that way.
4:47 They're old anyway. But for the rest of
4:49 us who are going to live on, you have to
4:52 have a plan now. And this leads me to
4:54 the next point, which is demographics.
4:58 Now, we always speak about 2050, 2060.
5:00 when's the stage we become the
5:03 demographic um minority? We've got to uh
5:06 take action before that time comes.
5:09 But I would probably argue uh we're
5:12 already there because remember what
5:14 matters here isn't the pure numbers.
5:17 What matters here is the critical mass.
5:19 That's the key. And what I mean by
5:22 critical mass is the amount of migrants,
5:26 leftists, liberals, hedinists, just just
5:28 general normies who are just plugged
5:30 into the system. Uh once you have a
5:32 critical mass of those, it's already too
5:34 late. Now, you could say, well, we can
5:36 try and change their minds. And yeah,
5:37 you you can you can, but I don't think
5:39 it's quite as easy as some people like
5:41 to make it out. You know, all we need to
5:43 do is have a a base nationalist party
5:45 and everyone will vote for it.
5:48 I think it will get a lot of energy, but
5:50 mass votes, I'm not quite sure. I think
5:51 these parties tend to succeed when
5:53 things really fall apart. That's when
5:56 radical movements uh tend to come in.
5:58 This is why it's in the interest of the
6:00 powers that be to maintain normal
6:02 functioning as much as they possibly can
6:04 to keep pumping out the slop to keep
6:06 people engaged and plugged into the
6:08 machine. And we have to remember as
6:09 well, you know, we were looking at the
6:13 figures yesterday. Yes, the right quote
6:15 unquote parties still have a majority in
6:17 terms of how people will vote. You know,
6:20 the Tories reform, restore and so on,
6:22 but it's not that much of a majority.
6:24 You know, it's sort of 45% of the
6:25 electorate is looking like they're going
6:28 to vote Libdem Labor green. Uh most of
6:30 them green. Um which goes to show you
6:33 it's unlikely those people or or more
6:34 than 5% of those people are going to
6:37 jump sides. Uh as I've said before,
6:39 political changes aren't usually
6:41 intellectually reasonable. Maybe if
6:42 you're a philosopher who thinks all day
6:44 they are, but for most people they're
6:47 emotional shifts and your psyche is
6:48 structured around the politics you
6:51 embiide via your world view. And again,
6:53 could make a sister video about that u
6:56 but it's a bit heavy. But this is again
6:58 the floor of modernity. We've replaced
7:00 our true metaphysical identity with our
7:03 political opinions and that defines how
7:05 we read reality. This is why I'm always
7:07 harking back to tradition. It gives us
7:10 an understanding of political positions
7:12 within a broader tradition rather than
7:15 being defined simply by your ideology.
7:17 Go. That's where you get ideologues
7:18 from. But many people are ideologues
7:21 these days and just embibe media and
7:23 their echo chamber about how the other
7:26 side are evil and stupid and and they're
7:28 clever, which is fine, you know, to to
7:30 satisfy, you know, you emotionally, but
7:32 it it's not a very good long-term
7:34 solution for a for a society, a
7:36 civilization. certainly not a people to
7:38 thrive, but the system wants it that way
7:41 for reasons we've already explored. So
7:44 again, and although numbers have gone
7:46 down since the Boris wave and oh woohoo,
7:48 you know, base gear slama, giga chad
7:50 meme, they're still coming in. He's not
7:51 going to stop the numbers. You know, we
7:54 need to have minus 250,000 at this
7:56 point. We need to reverse the Boris
7:59 wave. That's not happening. And every
8:00 year it's not happening. There are
8:02 hundreds of thousands coming in, more
8:05 and more um people being born and again
8:07 to to to parties like reform, they're
8:10 they're British citizens too, even if
8:11 they just came over on a banana boat and
8:15 got um you know uh citizenship somehow.
8:17 And then when you we have to factor in
8:20 the the final dimension to all of this
8:22 which is as things are splitting at home
8:24 there's also a massive split going on
8:26 between uh the MAGA right and the
8:30 European/western right at the moment and
8:32 this is framing everything in a much
8:35 more civilizational context. Uh things
8:38 are fragmenting. I I'll get into exactly
8:39 what I think's going on there cuz it's
8:41 more than we're being fed. You know the
8:42 Americans have got the line of oh these
8:44 European pansies they want us to do
8:46 everything. you're on your own now, you
8:49 pathetic cogs. And the Europeans uh line
8:53 is more well, you know, you're crazy
8:54 wars and so on. We don't want any part
8:56 of them. There's a lot more going on
8:59 than that. There's an epoacle shift, but
9:01 we have to understand how we got there
9:03 first before uh we can really riff on
9:06 that. Anyway, the first point, as I say,
9:09 is uh the liberal individualism. And
9:11 this is the absolute key. And you can
9:13 see Rubelo, I believe Rubelo is fighting
9:16 his natural instincts. Fair play to him.
9:18 He's he's the boomer that's come good,
9:20 you know, that seems to really be trying
9:23 to recognize what's going on and at
9:25 least listen, you know, which is is is
9:27 credit to him. And what I mean by that
9:30 is, you know, people who were grounded
9:33 in that 80s staturism are so tied to
9:35 money, freedom, markets, materialism, individualism
9:37 individualism
9:38 that that's their worldview. They
9:40 believe if we have that we'll have the
9:41 freedom I had, the freedom of
9:44 aspirationalism, the freedom to grow,
9:46 the freedom uh to be a strong country in
9:48 the world.
9:49 But they don't tend to look at the
9:51 effects of that worldview. I'm not
9:53 doubting that that that politics served
9:54 them well in their lifetime. You know,
9:56 they could buy their council house. They
9:58 earned a lot more money. The the price
10:00 of their house absolutely boomed over
10:03 the next 20, 30 years. I'm sure they did
10:05 have, you know, freedom of speech and
10:06 the government was out of their way. I'm
10:09 sure that was all true, but we're at a
10:11 time now where that that hand has been
10:12 played and you can't just keep playing
10:14 the same hand again because the
10:16 conditions have fundamentally changed
10:19 and also we often ignore uh what that
10:21 led to. And I've grown up with a lot of
10:23 this. You know, I'm a millennial. I grew
10:26 up in the '90s, the NS. And when I look
10:29 back, it was crazy. You know, it's not
10:31 all I'm not blaming all on that rights.
10:33 part partly the the liberal world as
10:35 well but there was a sense of mass
10:40 hedonism an obsession with with money
10:43 always being the the main consideration
10:45 of individualism you know I've said
10:47 before I grew up in a city um Leicester
10:49 which is highly multicultural and always
10:51 thinking oh like the Jamaican lads the
10:53 Indian lads have an identity I don't and
10:55 I I couldn't vocalize it back then but I
10:58 definitely felt it and a lot of the
11:00 ethos that I grew up with was you know
11:02 what will you do with your with your
11:04 life? What how will you earn money? That
11:06 was the only real consideration. And
11:07 there's a lot of rebellion that came
11:09 with that which is the shadow side I
11:12 think of this hedonistic individualistic mentality
11:14 mentality
11:16 which is people just falling into the
11:19 pleasure trap. And when you
11:21 promote the merchant to the king of your
11:23 society, all they care about is their
11:26 income. And this is why we have just so
11:29 many bloodthirsty corporations and well
11:31 everything around these days that just
11:32 wants to bleed you dry. Whether it's
11:35 gambling companies just pumping sports
11:38 full of adverts, whether it's the the
11:40 free availability of drugs and if you've
11:42 ever worked in London, people often in
11:44 those busy jobs they they rely on those
11:47 drugs to maintain uh the late nights and
11:49 so on. And then they go out and they
11:50 blast all the money in the bars. And you
11:52 think, well, all of this is in the favor
11:53 of the market really, cuz it's just
11:55 money, money, money. Things are turning,
11:56 things are moving, but it's unsustainable.
11:58 unsustainable.
12:01 I think another thing that is clear is
12:03 that that market mentality,
12:06 free markets, if you like, aligned with
12:08 the free open society, that's Blairism
12:11 ultimately, and led again to the the
12:14 promotion of the global individual. And
12:15 while you're supposed to be a global
12:16 citizen, in many senses, you're a
12:20 citizen of nowhere, which again led to
12:23 the development of the destruction of
12:25 the family. And I saw this in London. I
12:27 think we've all seen it. Uh men and
12:29 women, they're living lives, especially
12:31 the women want to be the girl boss, the
12:33 men want to get laid. And they just live
12:35 lives of of personal pleasure
12:37 increasingly. Have families later and
12:38 later, and the birth rates collapse. And
12:40 how do you replace that? Well, the
12:42 merchant says we can bring in people
12:44 from the third world. Uh they will be
12:46 our new working class. We'll we'll
12:48 replace our own working class who've
12:50 been destroyed. We've seen what's
12:52 happened to them. And then you get uh
12:55 mass migration. And we often think
12:58 foolishly that mass migration is
13:01 something that we can um we can turn off
13:03 like a tap we can turn off but maintain
13:06 the political system we have. We have to
13:08 realize that mass immigration is a
13:12 feature of the globalist liberal
13:14 libertarian political system. It is part
13:17 of neoliberalism. That's why it never
13:19 goes away in every single country
13:21 whether people vote for it or not. It's
13:23 not a political option. If the merchant
13:25 wants it, the merchant will get it. And
13:28 GDP is king. Uh and that is harsh
13:30 reality. So if we want rid of that, you
13:33 need new politics in my view.
13:37 And then we see uh people stating, you
13:39 know, this is the next stage of it. I
13:42 think we if we can just get rid of the migrants,
13:43 migrants,
13:45 we will be able to restore Britain,
13:48 quote unquote, or uh whatever other
13:49 nation that that thinks along these
13:52 lines. But again, I I think there is a
13:55 big problem here in terms of the
13:57 Blairite project has affected us in a
14:00 way we don't understand. Um, you know,
14:01 beware when you look into the abyss that
14:03 the abyss looks back at you. What I mean
14:05 is when we play these these clips of of
14:09 of Britain looking lovely in the 1950s
14:11 is clean. It's orderly. The people are
14:14 dressed well. Yeah. It looks like heaven
14:16 to us. And of course, you know, we
14:17 forget times were hard back then as
14:21 well. But the point I'm making is that
14:23 we forget you can't just throw people
14:25 out and expect that to return.
14:27 You could argue arguably say it's a
14:31 sense of uh racial puritanism if you
14:33 will. All we need is is the unified
14:37 people and it will it will blossom. I
14:39 would say that's only half the battle.
14:41 You also need your underlying
14:43 civilizational structures, your
14:46 traditions, your way of life in order to
14:48 create that society. So it's not just
14:51 people, it's people plus a a vital
14:53 tradition which gives you spiritual
14:56 life. And that's the knee thing, the
14:58 next key thing and I would say that's
15:00 probably more important than the
15:02 immigration because the one follows on
15:04 from the other. We have been turn we
15:06 were turned into sorry homoeconomic
15:09 first. We became obsessed with ourselves
15:12 first. We we took our eye off the tribe,
15:14 you know, and and not just us as
15:17 individuals within a tribe, but as as
15:19 part of an interbeing within the tribe.
15:21 And the tribe was part of its interbeing
15:23 with uh the civilizational structure and
15:25 that with the transcendent that would be
15:27 the priestly class that that act as the
15:29 um the figures who interact on that
15:32 level. My point being that we we've
15:34 deconstructed the whole hierarchy
15:37 metaphysically, socially and spiritually
15:39 uh of what we were. So simply just
15:41 getting rid of people is a start but
15:43 it's not going to lead to the vitality
15:46 that that we need. Anyway, back to the
15:48 key point is when we look at this over
15:50 the span of time taking the boomer who
15:52 was born say just at the end of the
15:55 second world war they benefited from all
15:57 of this. So they had the safe
16:00 homogeneous unified society with what
16:01 was then probably the embers of a
16:03 tradition. And yeah, you know, we can
16:05 point a finger at their parents and say
16:07 they were a bit stale and uh, you know,
16:09 stiff upper lip and all that, but they
16:11 did provide something real. They did
16:13 pass on what was at least what was left
16:15 of a civilization. They were probably
16:18 broken by the wars, but still there was
16:19 something that they passed on to the
16:23 boomers who then went off like a rocket
16:25 ship into the global market, into the
16:28 promise of money and markets and so on.
16:30 And that really ended with Blair's
16:32 global citizen. So you had the
16:35 homogeneous society into the wonder, the
16:37 awe, the creative destruction of
16:40 Thatcherism and then meeting with with
16:42 Blair's global citizen at the end
16:44 citizen at the end. And with all this,
16:47 of course, you uh also find they had
16:50 massive massive financial growth that
16:51 generations after them are just never
16:53 going to have. If you voted thatism
16:55 again, that would just make the merchant
16:57 more rich. And again, that's why the the
16:59 Green Party playing on that line. and I
17:01 would say correctly so on that front
17:03 their broader politics won't work but
17:05 they do have a message there to say to
17:07 young people that I don't think the
17:09 boomers can reach them with and that's
17:11 why I think many of the millennials and
17:13 the boomers often uh sorry millennials
17:16 and the zoomers tut at the boomer advice
17:17 you know get on your bike pull your
17:19 socks up go out there and compete with
17:21 the immigrants you know who have come
17:23 from some hellish part of the world and
17:26 are living nine people in one apartment
17:28 and will ride deliver and deal drugs on
17:30 the side all today, you know, go and
17:32 work your minimum wage job in Asda and
17:34 compete with them. You will be forgotten
17:36 and you will ruin your life. That's the
17:39 problem. So, we're in a bad way and and
17:42 the Green Party do offer young folks an
17:43 answer to that. Again, I don't think
17:46 it's going to work, but it is
17:48 at least they have a narrative to to
17:52 answer it. Now, the only person who
17:53 seemingly broke through all of this on
17:56 the right uh a few years ago was Jordan
17:59 Peterson. like him or loathe him and
18:01 many people have gone off him now for
18:03 various reasons and if you you know
18:05 listen to his stuff it is quite aged now
18:06 I was saying this in a chat with Nick
18:08 Dixon recently if you go back and listen
18:10 you're like oh yeah that's aged
18:13 but the point is he did break through to
18:16 these youngsters who were basically they
18:18 they just given up on life really they
18:19 were either living lives of hedonism or
18:21 thought there's no hope in life why
18:23 bother and he did pierce through that
18:26 veil and connect with millions and I
18:29 think what's so important about this is
18:32 Peterson maybe accidentally given what
18:35 we learned about his politics um and you
18:36 could say from the transcender
18:39 perspective maybe he was a conduit a
18:42 tool through which the divine gave a
18:45 message to lost western men that is was
18:49 something like you have a soul you are
18:51 someone you are a people you have a
18:53 tradition you have a heritage you know
18:55 it's your cultural heritage that's being
18:58 thrown away here And that did inspire
19:00 millions upon millions of men. Now, as I
19:02 say, it went a bit sour with Peterson
19:05 himself. He he got unwell and and seemed
19:08 increasingly unstable. Uh I hope he's
19:09 doing all right now, by the way. I think
19:12 he's in another bad way at the moment.
19:14 But he he he lost a lot of his audience
19:16 when he pushed down the kind of Ben Shapiro
19:17 Shapiro
19:21 Zorite type thing because again, it was
19:23 pretty much boomer messaging and he lost
19:25 the credibility. if we thought you
19:27 understood us, we thought you understood
19:29 what's going on in the world and now
19:30 we're back to sort of classic
19:32 libertarian center right market talk.
19:34 This isn't going to help us. Uh if
19:36 anything, this is just going to put us
19:40 further further in trouble. Um and this
19:42 leads to much of the talk that's become
19:44 more and more prevalent. Uh Peterson
19:47 famously said to Netanyahu to Netanyahu
19:49 give them hell about the gardens and well
19:50 well
19:54 uh Netanyahu did that and it wasn't
19:55 pretty. It wasn't pretty and I think
19:58 Peterson lost a lot of credibility and
20:02 was then a highly uh politically charged
20:03 figure for the sort of center right
20:06 containment if you will even promoting a
20:08 a new dimension of what's often called Holocaustianity.
20:10 Holocaustianity.
20:11 Uh Christianity is replaced by Second
20:13 World War narratives. the Holocaust
20:16 becomes Christ on the cross and your uh
20:18 whole of your moral system stems from
20:19 that. I think that was replete in
20:21 Peterson and certainly his political worldview.
20:23 worldview.
20:26 But we're seeing this split now play out
20:28 on the national and global stage. And as
20:31 I say, the Greens actually have a
20:34 unifying message, a unifying narrative
20:38 for the post-liberal world. um where
20:39 they can say to the different groups,
20:40 "Oh, you you've you've all been
20:43 oppressed and uh the whites are so
20:45 terrible." I think this is the way the
20:47 system's going to go anyway. But they
20:48 are riffing on that line which will
20:51 unify many different people by having
20:52 the shared enemy of the evil western
20:54 white male. And then you'll get the
20:56 leftist corbanistas, you know, the
20:58 people who, you know, I think many of
21:00 them are actually quite sweet. I think
21:01 they genuinely believe what they're
21:03 saying. There are some very sick people
21:05 in there too. But I think a lot of them
21:06 are just naive and they think everyone
21:09 genuinely will hold hands at the pride
21:12 marches in Kumbaya. Unfortunately, they
21:14 will realize it's not going to be like
21:16 that in the end. But I think they they
21:18 genuinely are true believers, many of them.
21:20 them.
21:22 And the only other thing you have then
21:25 is what is speaking to the boomers and
21:27 some folks who perhaps aren't that
21:29 politically engaged who think the
21:31 libertarian stuff can save the day.
21:33 That's Nigel Farage, the embers of of
21:36 the postw World War II narrative. I
21:39 think that might hold for one more uh
21:41 election, but I don't think it will work
21:42 again after 2030 simply because the
21:45 boomers will pass on all the more and if
21:47 and when Farage gets in, people will
21:48 say, "Oh, this is just more of the
21:51 same." And it's not changing anything
21:52 because it's not meant to change
21:54 anything. And we have to realize, you
21:57 know, the 20th century is gone, the 80s
21:59 are gone, liberal individualism has is
22:02 gone. So when we understand this on on
22:04 the national level, we can branch it out
22:06 into the the global level or at least
22:07 the western level where we have a
22:10 massive split between well Europe and
22:12 the west. I think it includes Canada and
22:15 Australia and New Zealand.
22:17 Uh having this big split with the US and
22:20 Trump has obviously gone into Iran. Many
22:24 people believe uh his hand was pushed uh
22:26 by the Israelis. It seems to be a war in
22:28 their favor. It doesn't seem to have
22:29 anything to do with us. No one really
22:31 buys this idea that Iran was going to
22:34 kill us all. Um people have been playing
22:37 clips of Netanyahu in the mid '90s
22:38 saying, "Oh, Iran's going to get a
22:41 nuclear weapon tomorrow." Uh 30 years
22:44 plus, you know, he's been saying that.
22:45 So, people just don't buy it. Not to
22:48 mention after the uh well scenes in in
22:51 in Palestine, some of them are just
22:54 absolutely brutal. And you still get a
22:56 lot of push back from the MAGATypes. Oh,
22:58 you know, you're a third worldist and uh
23:00 you know, you're just some dumb person
23:02 believing the left about Palestine. But
23:04 I think many people, you know, when
23:05 you're seeing children blown to
23:07 smitherines so Schlommo can build a new
23:09 condo in Goland Heights, you think,
23:11 "Yeah, this just isn't it?" you know,
23:13 this is this is wrong and it's
23:16 undeniable that this is wrong. And you
23:17 don't have to be some massive
23:19 Palestinian guy. You don't have to be a
23:20 leftist to notice that. I think it's
23:23 just a simple uh moral choice that one
23:25 makes when when viewing the harsh
23:26 reality of what's going on on the ground there.
23:28 there.
23:30 So, with that in mind, people are
23:31 thinking, what on earth are we doing in
23:33 Iran? How long before boots in the
23:35 ground? This is going to screw up
23:38 everything in the world with regards to
23:41 energy, economy, and the rest of it. And
23:43 there is this split. Now, clearly
23:44 there's a split between the liberal
23:47 world and and Trump, which is a a
23:49 different dimension. That might signify
23:51 Trump has has sort of gone alone with
23:52 the Israelis. There's a new power
23:55 structure in town alone there. Or it
23:56 could just mean that Trump has been
23:58 played. Who knows? Uh but at the same
24:00 time, you could say there's a split
24:01 between the liberal machine and Trump.
24:03 But I think mo the most important split
24:06 for the future is the western right/
24:09 Euro right and MAGA. That's the big one.
24:12 Um because this really speaks to the
24:14 future and and I think when you look at
24:16 the rhetoric coming from MAGA, they're
24:18 not understanding where the Europeans
24:21 are at and and other parts of the West,
24:23 the Australian right and so on. It's not
24:25 that they hate America. Many of them
24:27 love America or love Americans and they
24:30 view them as the same people. It's they
24:33 see the global American empire as the
24:35 problem which has become aligned with
24:38 Israel. And when the Americans say to
24:40 them, you know, screw you Europeans,
24:41 you're all pathetic. You know, you're
24:44 cucks. You're effing losers. We don't
24:45 need you anymore. You should have stood
24:47 with us.
24:49 Many of the European right are
24:51 responding and saying, "Well, actually,
24:53 fine. You know, if this is it and we
24:54 have to split, this might be a good
24:57 thing for us because while you can make
24:59 out that you're our great protector, we
25:01 have to look at the state of Europe."
25:03 You know this meme that everyone does of
25:06 what's say Javier Bardm in um no country
25:08 for old men if if this was the rule if
25:10 like if the rule after this of what use
25:12 was the rule and people are looking at
25:14 Europe under what has been the American
25:18 Empire and can see that this ideology of
25:20 mass individualism
25:23 mass immigration ruthless identity
25:25 anybody could be morphed into your
25:28 identity mass materialism the propaganda
25:31 from Hollywood I think recently I saw or
25:34 they're doing uh the the pope as gay is
25:36 the latest one which gives you an idea
25:39 of the flavor of things that we get out
25:41 of Hollywood again and again and again.
25:43 Might be Netflix that one actually but
25:45 you it's the same thing isn't it? Uh but
25:47 this is the general point. People look
25:48 at this and say, "Well, hang on a
25:51 minute. You know, you make out you save
25:52 us with the Marshall Plan, but will you
25:55 not just having a ploy to make the US
25:57 dollar the reserve currency for Europe
26:01 which gave you imperial economic control
26:04 over us?" Um, so and it's again it's not
26:07 the Americans we're talking about here.
26:08 It's the it's international finance
26:11 capital which was at the heart of of New
26:12 York and the New York financial system
26:14 which again London was integrated into
26:18 that. So the argument is encounter look
26:20 we like you but the system we're all
26:24 under does not serve any of us and it's
26:25 interesting because it seems to me that
26:28 MAGA is holding on to the liberal dream
26:31 you know the old west will come good uh
26:34 the Hollywood vision of of the sort of
26:37 guy in his fighter jet saving the day.
26:38 Well, many of us aren't seeing the world
26:40 like that anymore because the world is
26:42 changing and we're coming to the end of
26:45 the liberal dream. And it seems that
26:48 MAGA is still well what's left of MAGA
26:50 because to be fair there are many people
26:52 who've moved away to the America first
26:54 position which is much more aligned with
26:55 the European and broader western
26:58 position. There's obvious alignment that
26:59 can be made there and thank god there is
27:01 because you know we can't afford
27:03 infighting and like I say given there's
27:05 infighting I think there's a worm tongue
27:06 in the mix. But that's a video for
27:10 another time. But the point here is that
27:12 that there is a subsection of of the
27:14 American right that's move you know
27:17 Tucker Carlson um Fuentes people around
27:20 those those circles who are mo who have
27:23 moved totally away from MAGA and their
27:25 analysis is basically the same as the
27:27 Europeans. But the point here is that
27:29 that the MAGA has got all the power and
27:31 they are going to go down swinging and
27:34 go down fighting and it will it looks
27:37 like it's going to be messy. But when we
27:40 bring all of this together, what I think
27:42 is actually happening here is we're at
27:44 the end of an age. the solutions that
27:47 can be offered won't work. But the right
27:49 can't really offer a solution to the
27:51 globalist liberal worldview and the
27:54 globalist liberal state because the
27:59 populations now are so um well
28:02 heterogeneous. You have people from all
28:04 over the world that you can't have a
28:05 unifying message and the system planned
28:07 that on purpose that keeps the right
28:09 out. And at the moment it seems like
28:11 MAGA are going against that right on a
28:13 global scale.
28:15 What we have to point to or I believe
28:18 where things are going will have to be
28:23 some sort of panational movement if this
28:25 is to be rectified because it can't be
28:27 rectified on the national level. I think
28:29 in Britain were already passed that
28:30 state. They definitely already passed it
28:33 in America. Uh and many other European
28:35 nations I think are already passed it.
28:39 The only way now I think will be
28:41 something which is post-liberal and that
28:43 isn't that far away. Looking at the way
28:45 things are moving, we can see that
28:48 things are just falling apart. So the
28:50 question for us then as as European or
28:53 European origin peoples is where do we
28:55 move next? And that's where we come into
28:58 the broader traditionalism. Dugan talks
29:00 about this uh he's very anti-European
29:03 but he does offer a solution and you can
29:05 see Putin was actually repeating this
29:07 the other day that they're looking for
29:09 this multipolar world where you have
29:12 spheres of influence the China, Russia,
29:15 uh Persia, um what's left of the Western
29:19 world and so on. But in reality that's
29:21 just a ploy. I I don't think they even
29:23 mean that themselves. I mean that is not
29:25 the way human beings work. And it's
29:27 ironic because Dugan will speak about
29:29 hierarchy in a traditionalist context,
29:30 but then say, "Oh, but you know, on the
29:32 global scale, we'll all just be equal
29:34 and friends. That's not how the world
29:36 works." And and that's that's just
29:38 completely incoherent with your your
29:41 other philosophy. It's obvious the
29:42 Chinese are going to be the new big dogs
29:45 in town. That's clear. Uh and it's
29:47 obvious throughout human history that
29:49 you always have empires. There's never
29:51 been a time without empires. And to
29:52 imagine there won't be or we'll all have
29:54 our own empires and we'll get on
29:57 swimmingly is just wishful thinking. I
29:59 can sympathize with it. It's a nice
30:00 vision. I would love it. You know, we
30:02 have Europe and and we all try and be
30:04 respectful to one another. But I don't
30:06 think it's possible. There will always
30:08 be difficulties between differing powers
30:10 in the world. That's not to say we have
30:12 to be at war. I think you you can
30:15 formulate uh agreements and so on where
30:17 where you try and work together uh to
30:19 the maximum where possible while
30:21 maintaining the integrity of your own
30:23 region. But the point I'm getting at is
30:25 it's why I'm always talking to
30:28 tradition, panuropeanism,
30:30 or even panwesternism. Cuz when I say
30:32 panuropeanism, you know, I do mean the
30:34 Aussies, the Canadians. I'd love the
30:36 Americans to get involved, but but they
30:38 they're very deep into MAGA or at least
30:41 most of them are. So that is what it is.
30:44 But you do think we are on the verge of
30:46 coming to something very new. And what
30:48 does that look like? I don't know. I
30:50 don't know. I can't predict every bit of
30:54 it. But I do think while it looks
30:55 dangerous and potentially chaotic in the
30:59 future, it is a time for a reawakening
31:02 of economic models, of metaphysical
31:04 thinking, of spiritual thinking, of
31:06 social thinking, of the arts. I think we
31:09 need a massive recreation in the arts.
31:10 the arts are basically dead at this
31:12 point. It's just left this repeating
31:15 mockery of Christ over and over or
31:17 whatever else, you know, about their BPD
31:19 disorder. You know, it's just cliche
31:22 nonsense and has been for decades. So,
31:24 we're on the verge of a massive
31:26 awakening. The only question is, have we
31:30 been too beaten up by modernity, too
31:33 debased? You know, has our spirit been
31:37 so beaten down, so much McDonald's and
31:41 and uh and Netflix slob and Pn and
31:43 sportsport that we just have lost who
31:46 who and what we are. I don't believe we
31:48 have. I believe we're in a very bad way.
31:49 But I do believe we can spiritually
31:52 realign. I I believe that that's how
31:55 cycles work, how people work. Um and I
31:57 think over the next few decades, this is
31:59 what we're really moving towards. The
32:01 American Empire will fall. the liberal
32:03 empire will fall and western nations
32:06 will eventually start to just corrode
32:07 due to the hypocrisy of the liberal
32:09 system itself and the overarching power
32:11 structure will try to rule but it
32:15 depends upon our future unity that
32:16 doesn't have to be forced because it's
32:18 natural we just have to realize our
32:21 natural unity you know in an ethno
32:23 religious context once we can do that I
32:25 think we're cooking as always these are
32:27 my views very big video today but I
32:29 wanted to lay it out there as as I say a
32:30 big video of exposition
32:32 Do let me know what you think in the
32:33 comments. There is a sister channel on
32:35 personal spiritual transformation. Lots
32:37 of links down below. Do subscribe if
