This content outlines "20 Rules for Friends" as a guide for online discourse within a broadly defined "right-wing" or "dissident" movement, aiming to foster healthy community and trust amidst the challenges of modern society and online manipulation.
Mind Map
Zum Vergrößern klicken
Klicke, um die vollständige interaktive Mind Map zu öffnen
20 rules for friends a guide to online
discourse it's a common observation that
the right has organizational problems in
fact working in this space for some time
I've noticed two arrayed in opposition
to each other like Cilla and kreb this
first we had the problem with fraud
being the anti-establishmentarian force
in the 21st century the right is a
popular Target for opportunists for
people who want to make a name for
themselves as Guardians of the status
quo against the dangerous forces of
radicalization being an active subverter
of the right-wing community Through
misrepresentation and vilification can
be a lucrative career choice but in a
more mundane sense there's also the
garden variety grifter the people who
just want to ride the outrage cycle
without moving forward those who push
every distraction and drama to juice out
maximum clicks and we're ever so willing
to punch to the right the second it can
increase their brand profile everyone
knows this is a problem and that the
right needs to do better dig deeper and
impose some common sense gatekeeping but
it's just at the point of application of
this common sense gatekeeping that the
other foot drops we fall into the
Caribbean pit of Purity spiraling anyone
who has been in an online right-wing
space will know this problem All Too
Well since there is no common ideology
that unifies the right no institutional
Force no emerging power driving
spontaneous self-organization the right
is forced to Define itself broadly in
the negative as oppositional towards the
mainstream of course we know this is
insufficient we all know we need a
deeper belief and a more specific moral
and religious Vision however any attempt
to enforce such a standard in a distant
space generally will cut an individual
off from 99 of other people similarly
active in opposing mainstream power at
the extremes the pure believer living in
principle in most ordinary circumstances
will remain a Singleton a point of
opposition in despair against the
greater world the real beneficiary of
these circumstances is the establishment
and the army of grifter is making money
offselling outrage atomized people are
easy to control and subvert generally
they buy more outrage porn they fuel
pointless social media battles and they
lash out in spectacularly in effective
ways which of course fuels the
radicalism of the other side but is
there an alternative can we build some
kind of healthy community of distance
can we de-atomize people to come
together with an eye towards opposing
the corrosive forces of modernity and
building a social order focused on
Humanity's spiritual and physical health
to put the issue a different way one
might say that any anti-progressive
force in the modern world faces two obstacles
obstacles
the first build quality community and
Trust the second to avoids coming to
cancellation and the general entropy of
the progressive mainstream each of these
concerns tends to pull in opposite
directions which is exploited by our
enemies to frustrate our efforts towards
growth navigating these dual objectives
presents a riddle for any distant group
to find the fine line between moral
enforcement and political viability
probably everyone has their own answer
to this riddle but this is my attempt 20
rules for allies or as we say online friends
friends
first a disclaimer these rules are
largely discourse based and concern
relationships that are purely dialectic
in a sense these rules characterize what
some people call loose alignment with
the broad dissident movement therefore
these rules are much looser than the set
of best practices that should be taken
to in real life relationships where the
goal is to build long-term trust in real communities
communities
these roles also do not address the
ultimate Vision that should guide the
Improvement of long-lasting human
communities going forward largely any
organic Community would have to possess
a specific religious and cultural ethos
so that no generalized rule could ever
be formed
but with that disclaimer on to the list
rule one a friend believes in humanity
and a higher power
we have to start here there is no such
thing as value neutral politics
of course politics is fundamentally
about Coalition building friend enemy
and we want to keep the standards of
Community General but I don't think we
can get more General than the humanities
two essential political priorities one
preserving Humanities survival and
post-maternity and two sustaining
Humanity's relationship with God without
these two political priorities there can
be no cooperation perhaps we could make
these standards more General by
replacing god with truth goodness and
Beauty but the point would remain more
or less the same the right is the party
of human survival and human thriving
this requires dedication both to
humanity itself and to some higher moral
order therefore in this task we may have
a common cause with some deists
agnostics and atheists but we have no
common cause with nihilists we can't
trust them
rule 2 friends recognize liberal
modernity's threat to human thriving and
desire a new direction to ensure
Humanity's survival
putting a finer point on the matter what
is the subject of the rights political
activism this can be summarized
negatively as an opposition to the
current Global Order of
government-managed technocracy this
system in its present form sacrifices
long-term human thriving for short-term
solvency and power pushing out older
life-giving traditions and displacing
people in order to replace them with the
false promises of endless growth in
consumer-driven Lifestyles although very
few people at this stage don't see that
the modern world is in a state of Crisis
still what characterizes the real right
those on the right side of the red pill
is the understanding that these problems
go back to the core of late secular
modernity's presuppositions if not the
enlightenment itself there is no going
back to the 1990s there is no return to
Fresh Prince or even the 1950s whatever
the problem is it's now buried deep
across multiple generations and any
reversal will require a radical change
and break with the status quo
rule 3 friends understand that
boundaries are a core mechanism to
Foster Independence and health in the
face of modern society overwhelmingly
most people concerned with human
well-being are aware of modernity's
corrosive effect and understand
independence from the system is a
necessary component of human survival to
accomplish Independence dissident groups
seek boundaries and separation from the
whole either morally geographically or
politically as such regardless of the
differences between the various groups
sitting under the distant umbrella we
are all unified in our common value of
independent Association for the sake of
our own conscience in Humanity's broader survival
survival
in this way also various different
dissident friend groups share a common
enemy in the global managerial class
which for reasons thoroughly described
by Bertrand de juvenile is always
interested in Humanity's deconstruction
in homogenization to further push the
boundaries of managerial power it is
this Central struggle against
homogenization and centralization that
characterizes virtually all near-term
goals of dissident politics
rule for friends make promises and keep
them friends are capable of receiving
loyalty and giving it
so far my list has been negative are
there any positive qualities of friends
let's start with the most basic
right-wing of value making and keeping
promises if the left wing is antinomian
entropic or focused on the politics of
dissolving bonds the right by contrast
must be focused on the creation and
sustenance of bonds starting with trust
and the keeping of promises there's no
way we can make it through modernity
without being true to each other and we
can't be true to each other without
being true to our word
make promises keep them and always be
loyal in many ways I see this aspect as
both the right wings and and means or at
least where its ends and means meet what
people understand now is that there is
no slacktivism from the right there is
no way that politics can be an
entertainment product and still be
serious about the future maximizing
pleasure parasocial fake relationships
and illusory Comfort are the left's game
and they will always win that contest
for the right to win we need something
more we need real trust and real
relationships which means real kept promises
promises
rule five friends make their moral
commitments explicit no functional
nihilism no view from nowhere if the
base of a distant position is trust or
promise keeping what is the
superstructure that binds it together
what is the fundamental dialectic tool
that links such a diverse and disparate
group of people together allowing them
to communicate
in short this is formalism we say what
we mean we mean what we say we express
what we believe in our own moral
boundaries in concise and clearer
language and we don't use functionalism
and pure critique to score cheap wins
against rival parties immediately it
should be obvious to see the Practical
utility of formal commitments and
beliefs you can't have boundaries or
borders without clear lines you can't
have an actual conversation without
clearer language you can't have
understanding without clearer meaning
this is why basic simple beliefs are
often the most important the principles
that you can communicate and the moral
lines around which you constrain your
behavior and Allegiance All In All We
should strive to be clear with our
beliefs mystery Cults are not good but
generally explicitly stated principles
should be a practical prerequisite for
people working together in a diverse
Coalition men need to express their
commitments explicitly first so they can
be respected but also so that the
position of pure critique cannot be used
maliciously to deconstruct a genuine
pleas while never defending a positive
solution this was the problem with the
new atheist movement in virtually all
modern movements on the left the view
from nowhere always sounds smart tweets
any other position in a debate yet it
does little more than drive back biting
drama and create a race to the bottom
towards moral cynicism
roll six friends make an effort to
understand other friends core loyalties
there's nothing that I respect More Than
A True Believer and I understand the
need to enslate yourself from other
ideas that might be alien heretical or
would otherwise feed the fuel of Doubt
inside your own mind and soul
however we are building a broad
Coalition that needs to work together
and being a leader means not being
insulated from ideas that might be
foreign or hostile we need to know
ourselves and know our enemies but know
our allies know less because this is key
for establishing boundaries order and
peace pretty simple concept but
sometimes hard to execute just remember
to keep asking questions always assume
that conflict with other allies is due
to a misunderstanding and try to
intellectualize disagreements to
minimize their impact the last thing we
want is an Ever escalating holy war in
our own ranks will we stand divided
against the more existential threats of modernity
modernity
rule seven friends respect other friends
boundaries even if those boundaries
exclude them a related note but one that
is qualitatively different we need to
respect each other's boundaries is this
too obvious after the previous two
points about why we make boundaries in
the first place
perhaps but here I want to address the
more emotional elephant in the room the
issue of discrimination and exclusion
I know that we are all post-leftists we
all know that any real human Community
must include a dimension of exclusion
but when the Discrimination Cuts against
you in the moment you might forget this
eternal truth and relapse into shitlab's
Burgery in the immortal words a
Marcellus Wallace that's Pride [ __ ]
with you we need to be adults about this
of course everyone is Justified in being
concerned that others might be
conspiring against their own interest
but not every space is for you not every
context is suited for your presence
adults understand the necessity to
respect certain boundaries of religion
and ethnicity but also the necessity of
certain boundaries of age and lifestyle
for instance I can admit to myself here
that at my age I will never be cool I
can offer wisdom for what it is but my
temperament is totally unsuited for the
more Posh and urban circles knowing
these types of limitations and being at
peace with them is the first step
towards not being a spurg
rule eight friends always attempt to
de-escalate drama and dissolve
disagreements so now that we have
established our task is to build order
in life let's talk about the enemy of
order chaos
chaos is an expansive spiritual concept
but the most common way it enters into
human communities is through politics or
what we oftentimes call politics in more
personal situations drama
drama is the cause of most of the
problems on social media but also the
driver of all the clout which if we are
honest is a major reason why any of us
do this stuff to begin with
this leads to the phenomenon of the
internet of beefs there really is
nothing better for your own personal
profile than to start random conflicts
and drama online but there is really
nothing worse for the community or
building anything lasting for the future
anyone who's been doing this for any
amount of time will recognize the issue
it is amazing how thoroughly Petty
personal disputes destroy communities
even in the last year so many bonds
brought together through massive efforts
and expensive organization were torn
apart by the drama on Twitter it's
tragic when you think about it but
that's how human psychology works the
internet is driven by effeminate
fighting but real things only come from
masculine concordance in real life for
this reason it is imperative for all
community members content creators in
particular to de-escalate drama whenever
possible try to intellectualize
disagreements unravel and dissolve
disputes that don't lead anywhere and
focus always on productivity and expansion
expansion
rule nine friends refrain from insulting
core loyalties of other friends but
given that everyone knows drama is bad
and leads to bad things why does it
erupt so frequently one major reason is
again not understanding or respecting
verbal boundaries we should remember
here the notion of fighting words
expressions and statements that when
made are rightfully perceived as a
hostile attack on the object and require
an escalation of the conflict verbal or
physical there are certain fine lines
that people should have been taught in
school the lines that surround a man's
core loyalties these obviously include
deities or other direct focal points of
religion words describing God people's
children wives mothers and families
generally and of course direct attacks
on men's Integrity or women's virtue
back in the day insulting these things
slanted you right into a fistfight or
duel on the internet we can't enforce
these boundaries but let's respect the
lessons that in real life interaction
should have taught us
rule 10 friends maintain care around
secondary loyalties okay so maybe the
core loyalties are clear no-go zones but
isn't there a large gray area for banter
and locker room talk for memes for
intellectual discussion people can be a
little more forgiving or rented entity
is in relationships that aren't directly
sacred or personal
still we need to be careful I do think a
certain amount of mockery is allowable
in the right context when it comes to
certain racial religious and National
identities these are what I call
secondary loyalties loyalties that while
still critical can be held more lightly
because in most contexts when not
directly threatened by politics or War
they don't need to be directly defended
and therefore can be joked about among
friends as Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino
demonstrated some light ethnic bigotry
can be Charming in fact and most racists
don't care about what race you are so
long as you are racist too in the right
context of course
but due diligence is necessary the
proper relationship and demeanor need to
be established be careful of testing
these boundaries out in public spaces
unless it's very obviously a joke
loyalties even secondary ones can start
real fights and also steer clear of
these areas all together if some
Spectrum Disorder prevents you from
picking up on subtle context cues
rule 11 friends never punch right gnome
World announcements
this is a rule people know but that
needs quite a bit more explanation to
execute properly the last tactic is
divide and conquer it is a slow ratchet
that relies on conservatives providing
outrage to their left and gatekeeping to
their right each of these services in
turn expands The Horizon for the
Progressive Movement while guarding its
flank under these circumstances distance
main problem is a mainstream right that
can't do anything effective other than
counter signal against its more
principled members and facilitate a
dialectic where they are always the
default losers and we experience the
sharp end of this problem every time the
Boomer Normie Khan's pile on some
ill-conceived cancellation campaign
based on their enemy's own Progressive sensibilities
sensibilities
solution well don't punch right simple as
as
but it's actually not that simple the
right still needs dialectic moral
boundaries and intelligent discussion
embracing the grug-brained version of
don't punch right is a straight path
towards Purity spiraling and Total
Community brain drain it turns out that
we don't actually want bigotry
sociopathy or callousness just because
it's based and on the right but given
that any moral enforcement internally
causes a wedge that can be exploited by
our enemies to dissolve the Coalition
what can we do really this is an
extended conversation but it begins with
understanding how the left-wing
cancellation Cycle Works the leftist
cancellation cycle operates by
moralizing smearing and collectivizing a
moral panic casting all political
differences as moral failings moralizing
then vague language what I sometimes
call magic words are used to equivocate
and magnify the Panic smearing and
finally guilt by association is used to
trigger massed announcements essentially
not punching Right comes down to
arresting this process of cancellation
at all stages while preserving the other
elements of ordinary human moral
policing and enforcement we can start
with the first stage of the cancellation
process and address the issue of cynical
moralization or what some also call
leftists concerned trolling this is a
problem we know there are divisions
between those on the right important
religious divisions that represent
morals we take seriously
however this seriousness has to be held
in line with the political reality of
leftist subversion the first step is to
be aware of the moral direction of the
left and the fads that it uses cynically
for its own ends of course Nadia isn't
wrong just because the progressive
Cathedral is promoting it a broken clock
is right two times a day but you don't
want to allow your enemies momentary
lapse of clarity to become a tool in
your community's destruction therefore
we have to find a way of resolving moral
conflicts internally my preferred way of
addressing this issue relies on a
three-stage process that I like to call this
this
de-escalate intellectualize and separate
first de-escalate make sure that you
remove motion and explicit attack on the
honor of the Allied individuals and communities
communities
second intellectualize the problem by
Framing the disagreement as a contention
over factual matters or some ethical
contention frame the task properly State
the disagreement in the way your
opponent agrees with and develop a
commonly understood list of what each
side wants and the lines that each side
can't cross finally separate develop a
space for each moral system to operate
and rules that can prevent the
disagreement from escalating further to
the extent that there is a disagreement
over boundaries seek Arbitrage from a
third party or higher authority with
this framework political division can
still be allowed Purity spiraling
minimized without opening up too many
cracks for Progressive subversion
rule 12 friends avoid counter signaling
jumping on Cathedral bandwagons or
cancellation campaigns
here we must address halting the next
stage of the progressive cancellation
process the issue of smearing language
again anyone who spent a long time in
the distance space is well aware of how
mainstream conservatives play into this process
process
they become co-owners of less
terminology therefore they become the
unwitting enforcers of the less owned
moral system as much as they complain
about cancer culture their actions are
actually driving it
in short the mainstream right is
addicted to counter signaling their own
activist class how do we stop this
stupid counter signaling how do we stop
the ratchet without falling into mere
contrarianism here I think the issue is
actually pretty easy leftist linguistic
smearing relies in a certain kind of
tactical equivocation that I have called
in the past magical words these magical
words are words with deep emotional and
political consequences for those labeled
with them but with no specific meaning
that can be consistently defined as such
these words are just transport for the
will of progressive power their enemies
are always punished their allies are
always spared with no ethical
consistency or coherency required how to
respond to these magical words
this is a hard nut to crack every now
and again distance can reclaim one of
these magic words and use them
effectively against the cathedral itself
but this is the exception and not the
rule for the most part magical words
like the One Ring of Sauron are owned by
the power that created them we need to
avoid their use remember while we Forum
language language also forms us we think
we can control it but more often than
not we can't so unless you're really
confident in what you're doing it is
best to keep the black tongue of Mordor
out of your mouth as an aside I can hear
less an example from my own online
presence among right Wingers I have from
the beginning been rather outspoken in
my feelings that race needs to be
de-emphasized as far as possible but
still I never use the word racism to
describe my disagreement with others who
want to emphasize the more ethnic
dimensions of the crisis not only is the
word rendered meaningless by
equivocation it is dangerous dialectic
poison and a weapon that will eventually
be used against me if I give it power
Rule 13 friends make themselves strong
enough to hold the line or make room for
those who can and here finally is the
last line of defense against the
progressive cancellation cycle which is
no less than the last line of defense
against any spiritual or physical attack
fortitude we need to hold the line
bravery is essential because so much of
the left's cancel culture power is based
on fear the cascading nature of
cancellations were implied guilt by
association triggerist announcement
after denouncement people are afraid
afraid of losing their careers their
reputations their relationships with
family and friends so they Panic they
cave they give in
but at some point this has to stop
people need to stand up and speak up
take risks expose themselves to
criticism and ignore the enemies threats
when they ask for another head to be
delivered unto them look we all need to
manage our own exposure and privacy
individually we need to decide just how
much we can give to this larger effort
when there are other things in our lives
other people who rely on us
but that being said there is a
responsibility attendant when we step
forward to represent our resistance and
defend the community make yourself a
point of strength don't throw others
under the bus to be the good one and
don't betray those who put their trust
in you because it's easier or better for
your public profile
don't let down the man standing next to
you by retreating then reframe the issue
as self-care this is a collective effort
and we have to take responsibility to
stand with each other in times of crisis
are these requirements too stringent to
be met at the stage of your life that's
fine maybe it's time to sit out around
take a more subdued role in the project
there is plenty of work to be done
behind the scenes and plenty of other
people waiting to take your place on the
front lines
rule 14 friends always stay building
this is something that I've often said
over the years always be building
but I think it's become clear postcovid
that there is just no Victory to be run
through clout and politics winning has
to produce something it can't just be
winning for the sake of feeling like
you're winning so you can flex and feel
good about yourself
we have to build the future we want this
means that all action taken inside the
community has to leave something
substantive behind you more resources
for other friends to use better wisdom
broader networks best practices and
institutions that can facilitate the
creation of new things political or
otherwise a lot of people push back on
Curtis yarvin's later work but one of
his recent observations needs to be
etched in stone a victory is anything
that makes future victories easier or
more likely Whenever you set your mind
or will to accomplish something begin
with the end in mind ask what does this
produce how does this make a better
world substantively in the present or
make victories easier to produce in the
future with this in mind we can stay
focused on the real task ahead of us
creating order in life so we can pass it
down to our children and future Generations
Generations
rule 15 friends never docks or harass
non-institutional targets alright so
this is mostly just following the terms
of service for most social media sites
still I think we need to understand the
broader boundaries when it comes to
cultural Warfare we don't want to attack
non-combatants we don't want to use
valuable resources to spread the scope
of War as we try to achieve order
spreading chaos and terror is simply
counterproductive for this reason
friends do not dogs harass or viciously
attack private persons as a Christian I
obviously believe that war has certain
ethical boundaries that need to be respected
respected
certain things are off limits to attack
but setting aside even this broader
moral perspective Prosecuting cultural
Total War is simply bad politics from a
strictly Machiavellian perspective as
men of the right we are agents of order
and order has to be both our end and our means
means
we need to represent in war the mode of
rulership that we would want to live
under in peace that's how people begin
to trust your promises that's how people
begin to follow your banner and believe
in a better world
and as I want to remind people this is a
war of belief
rule 16 friends always pursue self-improvement
self-improvement
there is that constant refrain become
worthy then rule it's become so often
repeated that the words have become
cliche in trite even the recommendations
probably aren't very original here
Pursuit Excellence physical intellectual
familial and spiritual the right wing
jimbro culture is a win in and of itself
still in spite of what's gone before I
feel like I need to say something about
the Quest for improvement generally this
is something that a lot of older
Millennials will recognize but wasn't
the Quest for self-improvement easier
when we were younger it's not just the
material conditions or the physical
reality of getting older for my
generation the gradual decline in
optimism was the deepest cut during my
youth America and the West had a bright
future ahead of them everything was on
the app when I improved myself I was
improving my future improving the world
moving the boundaries and the prospects
of humanity ever upwards but now in the
middle of obvious and metastasizing
decline you can't improve faster than
things are getting worse no matter how
much effort you put into things you will
never see macrocosmic progress It's the
Red Queen principle you have to run fast
just to stand still and no matter how
much you improve you won't overcome the
downward slide of everything around you
in this context I think there is a
crisis of motivation among Millennials
I'm not the only one who's noticed this
but after a point My Generation just
sort of gave up the natural pull at this
stage is always towards regression and
to the extent that any of us don't want
to be part of this problem we need to
fight this Instinct of decline in every
context in which you strive in every
location where you live there needs to
be a constant movement towards
betterment towards Improvement and
towards order the rest of the world
might be going to pot but that does not
change our own moral imperative we need
to be the tiny bubble of civilization
inside a world of barbarism we need to
be the beacon of Sanity inside clown
world the point of stability in a sea of
chaos again this is what necessarily
differentiates us from our enemies
sometimes people ask me the various ways
a person can recognize good from Evil an
ordered spiritual presence from a
demonic one traditionally this has had a
very common answer the sinful or chaotic
discordant in two-faced the holy are
constant and stable in time pursue that constancy
constancy
rule 17.
friends always expand the Coalition and
find new friends
perhaps this is an extension of the
previous rule or simply a restatement of
the core purpose of finding friends to
begin with but we are building a
coalition no one is yet naive enough to
still believe in individualism in 2023
right winter is coming times are dark
and we need to draw together enemies are
expensive friends are invaluable and we
need alliances everywhere to function in
a globalized world sometimes I think
there is some resistance to this more
unifying Direction by some very online
types there's a type of person who likes
disrupting things and creating drama
because they want to be a big fish in a
small pond in this regard growth can be
threatening to Ego and clout but
hopefully after everything we have seen
we have come past this more juvenile way
of thinking we need to grow or die so
it's time to get to work
rule 18 friends give and receive
constructive criticism
speaking of egos another necessary
component of survival will be humility
the ability to take criticism who can't
improve unless we sustain disagreement
obviously but we also can't improve
unless we receive direct personal
criticism no matter how painful that
might be
this is obviously easier said than done
picking as a content creator who is
essentially poured an enormous amount of
his life into this movement there's
nothing I hate more than having an
anonymous Twitter troll tell me I
haven't worked hard enough and I don't
think any productive conversations have
ever been started by a moral posturing
really Prudence is needed if you want to
communicate and need to improve or
helpful suggestion reach out in private
even better if this can be communicated
in person in all likelihood you'll need
to build a relationship before anything
real can be accomplished but I suppose
also there is a reciprocal side of
things content creators in particular
need to keep their egos in check we need
to remember that we aren't bigger men
just because we have bigger voices on
social media we are just teachers
servants and servants need to listen and obey
obey
rule 19 friends forgive mistakes when
asked we've already discussed several
marks of the evil chaotic temperament
lack of constancy and inability to build
let's discuss another the inability to
extend forgiveness people don't talk
about this a lot on the right wing but
the ability to forgive is not only a
sign of goodness but also a sign of
strength its absence is a sign of evil
and a sign of weakness when I myself was
a progressive the complete inability of
powerful leftists to conceptualize true
reconciliation is one of the first truly
evil things I noticed about the movement
really this lack of forgiveness occurred
gradually in progressives as a product
of their own cultural degeneration but
this degeneration must be arrested in
our own case
of course there is the need for justice
I need to hold people accountable the
more often than not these instincts that
will up inside of us are born out of
Pride and vindictiveness and not a
genuine pursuit of righteousness
again the internet has been a large part
of bringing this bad element out in people
people
but also remember to put yourself in
your opponent's shoes
we are all on this mess together we are
all part of the problem we are all the
most begotten Children of the modern
evil if we can come through it all with
all of our own flaws and sins and still
call ourselves good enough to be part of
the solution why can't we extend this
life-giving charity to our own rivals
rule 20
friends know others by their fruits
finally and most succinctly there is no
replacement for genuine quality genuine
virtue and genuine goodness
as Christ himself said we know who was
worthy of following by the goodness they
leave to the world this is an
instruction as much as it is a warning
remember to observe people in their actions
actions
see what they sacrifice for and how they
conduct themselves in their words in
their interactions online and more
importantly in their comportment in the
real world
no institution is better than the people
who make it up no law or Constitution is
stronger than the promises of those who
write it pledge allegiance to it and
fight in its name if this movement is to
succeed and accomplish anything it must
rely on the virtues and loyalties of the
people who make it up and as such we
must seek goodness and virtue and others
and cultivated in ourselves
for a while I believe this temporal
goodness will be enough to sustain us
but as things may grow darker we will
need to reach for higher things
piety Holiness sainthood
it's a daunting proposition
but not a task we need to pursue alone
we have the help of God and God willing
the help
Klicke auf einen beliebigen Text oder Zeitstempel, um direkt zu dieser Stelle im Video zu springen
Teilen:
Die meisten Transkripte sind in unter 5 Sekunden bereit
Mit einem Klick kopieren125+ SprachenInhalt durchsuchenZu Zeitstempeln springen
YouTube-URL einfügen
Gib den Link eines beliebigen YouTube-Videos ein und erhalte das vollständige Transkript
Transkript-Extraktionsformular
Die meisten Transkripte sind in unter 5 Sekunden bereit
Unsere Chrome-Erweiterung installieren
Transkripte abrufen, ohne YouTube zu verlassen. Installiere unsere Chrome-Erweiterung und greife mit einem Klick direkt auf der Wiedergabeseite auf das Transkript jedes Videos zu.
